P= 7r+3q work out the value of p when r = 5 and q= -4

For all n ≥1, 10^n −1 is divisible by 9: the induction hypothesis, 10^k − 1 is divisible by 9. Therefore, 9 divides the second term. Also, 9 divides 9*10^k, since 9 is a factor of 9 and 10^k is a power of 10. Hence, 9 divides the entire expression 10^(k+1) − 1.

We will use mathematical induction to prove the statement. Base Case: For n = 1, we have 10^1 − 1 = 9, which is divisible by 9. Induction Hypothesis: Assume that for some positive integer k, 10^k − 1 is divisible by 9.

Induction Step: We need to show that if the statement is true for k, then it is also true for k+1. We have: 10^(k+1) − 1 = 10^k − 1 = 9^k + (10^k − 1)

By the induction hypothesis, 10^k − 1 is divisible by 9. Therefore, 9 divides the second term. Also, 9 divides 9*10^k, since 9 is a factor of 9 and 10^k is a power of 10. Hence, 9 divides the entire expression 10^(k+1) − 1.

As a result, we have demonstrated through mathematical induction that 10n-1 is divisible by 9 for all n.

To know more about induction hypothesis, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30434803#

#SPJ11

"The chi-square goodness of fit test is a statistical test used to determine whether the distribution of a categorical variable is significantly different across multiple populations or treatments". The given statement is correct.

It is a chic and powerful tool for analyzing and interpreting data in various fields of study.

The chi-square goodness of fit test is a statistical method used to determine whether the observed distribution of a categorical variable differs significantly from the expected distribution across several populations or treatments.

This test helps identify if there is a relationship between the categorical variable and the populations under study.

Visit here to learn more about Chic-Square Test:

brainly.com/question/31519775

#SPJ11

The definition of the standard error of estimate is the dispersion (scatter) of observed values around the line of regression for a given x.

It represents the average amount that the predicted values of y from the regression line differ from the actual values of y for a given x. This measure helps to assess how well the regression equation fits the data points, and a smaller standard error of estimate indicates a better fit. The other options listed are not the correct definition of the standard error of estimate.

The standard deviation of sample measures of the x variable represents the variability of the x values, while the standard deviation of sample measures of the y variable represents the variability of the y values.

.To learn more about standard deviation click here

brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Answer: 6.9 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

1.15 ounces x 6 = 6.9 ounces

Answer:

195.612 grams which is 6.9 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

one ounce equals 32.602 grams, and Andrew has a package of 6 cookies, so if you multiply 32.602 by 6 = 195.612 grams, which equals 6.9 ounces.

If the terminal point p(x, y) determined by a real number t is given then sin(t) = 13/sqrt(205), cos(t) = -6/sqrt(205), and tan(t) = -13/6.

To find sin(t), cos(t), and tan(t), we first need to determine the values of x and y. The terminal point p(x, y) is given as (−6/7, 13/7), which means that x = -6/7 and y = 13/7.

Next, we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the length of the hypotenuse r:

r² = x² + y²

r² = (-6/7)² + (13/7)²

r² = 36/49 + 169/49

r² = 205/49

r = sqrt(205)/7

Now we can find sin(t), cos(t), and tan(t):

sin(t) = y/r = (13/7) / (sqrt(205)/7) = 13/sqrt(205)

cos(t) = x/r = (-6/7) / (sqrt(205)/7) = -6/sqrt(205)

tan(t) = y/x = (13/7) / (-6/7) = -13/6

Therefore, sin(t) = 13/sqrt(205), cos(t) = -6/sqrt(205), and tan(t) = -13/6.

To know more about Pythagorean theorem  click on below link :

https://brainly.com/question/14669175

#SPJ11

The terminal point determined by t is (-6/7, 13/7).

To find sin(t), we need to find the y-coordinate of the point on the unit circle that corresponds to t. Since the y-coordinate of the point is 13/7, and the radius of the unit circle is 1, we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find that the x-coordinate of the point is -√(1 - (13/7)²) = -√(48/49) = -4/7.

Therefore, sin(t) = y-coordinate / radius = 13/7. To find cos(t), we can use the same method to find that the x-coordinate of the point is -4/7, so cos(t) = x-coordinate / radius = -4/7. Finally, tan(t) = sin(t) / cos(t) = -(13/7)/(4/7) = -13/4.

In summary, for the terminal point determined by t (-6/7, 13/7), sin(t) = 13/7, cos(t) = -4/7, and tan(t) = -13/4. These values represent the ratios of the sides of a right triangle in standard position with hypotenuse of length 1 and one of the acute angles t.

These trigonometric functions are useful in solving various problems involving angles and distances, as well as in modeling real-world phenomena.

To know more about Pythagorean theorem click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14930619#

#SPJ11

The graph relating the variables a and b would be a downward-sloping line or a negative correlation. When it is stated that "if a decreases, then b will also decrease," it indicates a negative relationship or correlation between the variables a and b.

In this case, as the value of a decreases, the value of b also decreases. This relationship can be visually represented by a downward-sloping line on a graph.

As you move from left to right along the x-axis (representing a), the corresponding values on the y-axis (representing b) decrease. This negative correlation suggests that there is an inverse relationship between the two variables, where changes in a are associated with corresponding changes in the opposite direction in b.

The extent and strength of the negative correlation can vary, ranging from a perfect negative correlation (a straight downward-sloping line) to a weaker negative correlation where the relationship is less pronounced.

Learn more about  variables here:- brainly.com/question/15078630

#SPJ11

a. The two-way table is attached.

b. probability of lung cancer is 0.2.

d.  probability of a smoker is 0.625

b. If someone in this population is a smoker, the probability that person will develop lung cancer is P(C | M) = 0.05/0.25 = 0.2 or 20%.

c. The general probability that an individual develops lung cancer is 0.08 or 8%, which is higher than the probability of developing lung cancer if they are a smoker (20%). This suggests that smoking is a significant risk factor for developing lung cancer.

d. If someone in this population gets lung cancer, the probability that person is a smoker is P(M | C) = 0.05/0.08 = 0.625 or 62.5%.

e. The general probability that an individual is a smoker is 0.25 or 25%, which is higher than the probability of being a smoker if they have lung cancer (62.5%). This suggests that smoking is a major contributing factor to developing lung cancer in this population.

Find out more on Probability here: https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

The values of the other 5 trigonometric functions of x is shown below:

Given that sin x = 1/4, solve for cos x using the identity

cos^2 x + sin^2 x = 1

substituting for sin x

cos^2 x + (1/4 )^2 = 1

cos^2 x + 1/16 = 1

cos^2 x = 1 - 1/16

cos^2 x = 15/16

cos x = ± sqrt(15/16)

Since x lies in the second quadrant and cosine is negative here

cos x = -sqrt(15)/4

For tangent

tan x = sin x / cos x

tan x = (1/4) / (-sqrt(15)/4)

tan x = -1/sqrt(15)

For cosec x

csc x = 1 / sin x

csc x = 1 / (1/4)

csc x = 4

For sec x

sec x = 1 / cos x

sec x = 1 / (-sqrt(15)/4)

sec x = -4/sqrt(15)

For cot x

cot x = 1 / tan x

cot x = 1 / (-1/sqrt(15))

cot x = -sqrt(15)

Learn more about trigonometry at

https://brainly.com/question/13729598

#SPJ1

The value of cos θ is √15/4.

The value of tan θ is  1/√15.

The value of sec θ is 4/√15.

The value of cosec θ is 4.

The value of cot θ is √15.

The value of other trigonometry function of θ is calculated as follows;

sinθ = opposite side / hypotenuse side = 1/4

The adjacent side of the right triangle is calculated as follows;

x = √ (4² - 1²)

x = √15

The value of cos θ is calculated as follows;

cos θ = √15/4

The value of tan θ is calculated as follows;

tan θ = sin θ / cosθ

tan θ = 1/4 x 4/√15

tan θ  = 1/√15

The value of sec θ is calculated as follows;

sec θ = 1/cos θ

sec θ = 1/( √15/4)

sec θ = 4/√15

The value of cosec θ is calculated as follows;

cosec θ = 1 / sinθ

cosec θ  = 1/(1/4)

cosec θ = 4

The value of cot θ is calculated as follows

cot θ = 1/tan θ

cot θ = 1/( 1/√15)

cot θ = √15

Learn more about trigonometry functions here: https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

To find the area of the pentagon, I will first determine the apothem and then 1/2 of the perimeter.

To determine the area of the polygon, I will first determine the apothem which is the line segment that springs forth from the center of the base to the middle of the pentagon.

After this, is obtained, I will determine the perimeter of the polygon and multiply the perimeter by 0.5 and then the result by the apothem. This is the simple format for finding the area of a five-sided polygon.

Learn more about polygons here:

https://brainly.com/question/1592456

#SPJ1

a) The particular solution y = f ( x ) to the differential equation with the initial condition f ( 2 ) = 1 is y = e¹/₃x³ + 1.

b) The value of the  lim x → [∞] f ( x ) is (y-1)x²

To find the particular solution y = f(x) to the given differential equation with the initial condition f(2) = 1, we need to integrate both sides of the equation with respect to x. This gives:

∫dy / (y - 1) = ∫x² dx

We can evaluate the integral on the right-hand side to get:

∫x² dx = (1/3)x³ + C1,

where C1 is the constant of integration. To evaluate the integral on the left-hand side, we can use a substitution u = y - 1, which gives du = dy. Then the integral becomes:

∫dy / (y - 1) = ∫du / u = ln|u| + C2,

where C2 is another constant of integration. Substituting back for u, we get:

ln|y - 1| + C2 = (1/3)x³ + C1.

We can rewrite this equation as:

ln|y - 1| = (1/3)x³ + C,

where C = C1 - C2 is a new constant of integration. Exponentiating both sides of the equation gives:

|y - 1| = e¹/₃x³ + C'.

Since we are given that f(2) = 1, we can use this initial condition to determine the sign of the absolute value. We have:

|1 - 1| = e¹/₃(2)³ + C',

which simplifies to:

C' = 0.

Therefore, the particular solution to the differential equation with the initial condition f(2) = 1 is:

y - 1 = e¹/₃x³,

or

y = e¹/₃x³ + 1.

To find the limit of f(x) as x approaches infinity, we can use the fact that eˣ grows faster than any polynomial as x approaches infinity. This means that the dominant term in the expression e¹/₃x³ will be e¹/₃x³ as x approaches infinity, and all the other terms will become negligible in comparison. Therefore, we have:

lim x → [∞] f(x) = lim x → [∞] (e¹/₃x³ + 1) = ∞.

In other words, the limit of the particular solution as x approaches infinity is infinity, which means that the function grows without bound as x gets larger and larger.

In this case, an equilibrium solution would satisfy dy/dx = 0, which implies that y = 1.

To see if this solution is stable, we can examine the sign of the derivative dy/dx near y = 1. In particular, we can compute:

dy/dx = (y-1)x² = (y-1)(x)(x),

which is positive when y > 1 and x > 0, and negative when y < 1 and x > 0.

To know more about differential equation here

https://brainly.com/question/30074964

#SPJ4

The estimate for the sum of the series is s ≈ 3025. We can improve our estimate to s ≈ 1.52. If we take n = 4472, then the error in the approximation s ≈ sn will be less than 10^-7.

(a) To estimate the sum of the given series using the sum of the first 10 terms, we can plug in n = 1 to 10 and add up the results:
s10 = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + ... + 10^3
Using the formula for the sum of consecutive cubes, we can simplify this expression to:
s10 = 1/4 * 10^2 * (10 + 1)^2 = 3025
So the estimate for the sum of the series is s ≈ 3025.

(b) To improve this estimate using the given inequalities, we first need to find a function f(x) that satisfies the conditions of the integral test. The integral test states that if f(x) is positive, continuous, and decreasing for x ≥ 1, and if a_n = f(n) for all n, then the series ∑a_n converges if and only if the improper integral ∫f(x) dx from 1 to infinity converges.
One function that satisfies these conditions and is convenient to work with is f(x) = 1/x^3. We can verify that f(x) is positive, continuous, and decreasing for x ≥ 1, and that a_n = f(n) for all n in our series.
Using this function, we can use the following inequalities:
sn + ∫10∞ 1/x^3 dx ≤ s ≤ sn + ∫10∞ 1/x^3 dx
We can evaluate the integrals using the power rule:
sn + [(-1/2x^2)]10∞ ≤ s ≤ sn + [(-1/2x^2)]10∞
sn + 1/2000 ≤ s ≤ sn + 1/1000
Substituting s10 = 3025, we get:
3025 + 1/2000 ≤ s ≤ 3025 + 1/1000
1.513 ≤ s ≤ 1.526
So we can improve our estimate to s ≈ 1.52.

(c) To use the Remainder Estimate for the Integral Test to find a value of n that will ensure that the error in the approximation s ≈ sn is less than 10^-7, we first need to find an expression for the remainder term Rn = s - sn. The Remainder Estimate states that if f(x) is positive, continuous, and decreasing for x ≥ 1, and if Rn = ∫n+1∞ f(x) dx, then the error in the approximation s ≈ sn is bounded by |Rn|.
Using our function f(x) = 1/x^3, we can write:
Rn = ∫n+1∞ 1/x^3 dx
Using the power rule again, we can evaluate this integral as:
Rn = [(-1/2x^2)]n+1∞ = 1/2(n+1)^2
So the error in the approximation is bounded by |Rn| = 1/2(n+1)^2.
To find a value of n that makes |Rn| < 10^-7, we can solve the inequality:
1/2(n+1)^2 < 10^-7
(n+1)^2 > 2 x 10^7
n+1 > sqrt(2 x 10^7)
n > sqrt(2 x 10^7) - 1
Using a calculator, we get n > 4471.
So if we take n = 4472, then the error in the approximation s ≈ sn will be less than 10^-7.

Learn more about the series here: brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

Answer:

The graph of the polynomial function f(x) = x^4 + x^3 - 2x^2 will depend on the behavior of the function as x approaches infinity and negative infinity, as well as the location and behavior of any local extrema.

To determine the behavior of the function as x approaches infinity and negative infinity, we can look at the leading term of the polynomial, which is x^4. As x becomes very large (either positive or negative), the x^4 term will dominate the expression, and f(x) will become very large in magnitude. Therefore, the graph of the function will approach positive or negative infinity as x approaches infinity or negative infinity, respectively.

To find any local extrema, we can take the derivative of the function and set it equal to zero:

f(x) = x^4 + x^3 - 2x^2

f'(x) = 4x^3 + 3x^2 - 4x

Setting f'(x) equal to zero, we get:

4x(x^2 + 3/4x - 1) = 0

The solutions to this equation are x = 0 and the roots of the quadratic expression x^2 + 3/4x - 1. Using the quadratic formula, we can find these roots to be:

x = (-3 ± sqrt(33))/8

Therefore, the critical points of the function are x = 0 and x = (-3 ± sqrt(33))/8.

To determine the behavior of the function near each critical point, we can use the second derivative test. Taking the second derivative of f(x), we get:

f''(x) = 12x^2 + 6x - 4

Evaluating f''(0), we get:

f''(0) = -4

Since f''(0) is negative, we know that x = 0 is a local maximum of the function.

Evaluating f''((-3 + sqrt(33))/8), we get:

f''((-3 + sqrt(33))/8) = 11 + 3 sqrt(33)/2

Since f''((-3 + sqrt(33))/8) is positive, we know that x = (-3 + sqrt(33))/8 is a local minimum of the function.

Evaluating f''((-3 - sqrt(33))/8), we get:

f''((-3 - sqrt(33))/8) = 11 - 3 sqrt(33)/2

Since f''((-3 - sqrt(33))/8) is also positive, we know that x = (-3 - sqrt(33))/8 is another local minimum of the function.

Based on this information, we can sketch the graph of the function as follows:

Therefore, the statement that describes the graph of this polynomial function is: "The graph of the function has a local maximum at x = 0 and two local minima at x = (-3 ± sqrt(33))/8. As x approaches infinity or negative infinity, the graph of the function approaches positive or negative infinity, respectively."

The Maclaurin series through degree 4 of f(x)=(1+x)^(-4/3) is approximately 1 - (4/3)x + (14/9)x^2 - (56/27)x^3 + (208/81)x^4.

To find the Maclaurin series of f(x)=(1+x)^(-4/3), we start by using the formula for the Maclaurin series of a function f(x) centered at x=0:

f(x) = ∑[n=0 to infinity] f^(n)(0) * x^n / n!

where f^(n)(0) represents the nth derivative of f(x) evaluated at x=0.

We begin by finding the first few derivatives of f(x):

f(x) = (1+x)^(-4/3)

f'(x) = (-4/3)(1+x)^(-7/3)

f''(x) = (28/9)(1+x)^(-10/3)

f'''(x) = (-224/27)(1+x)^(-13/3)

f''''(x) = (2912/81)(1+x)^(-16/3)

Evaluating these derivatives at x=0, we get:

f(0) = 1

f'(0) = -4/3

f''(0) = 14/9

f'''(0) = -56/27

f''''(0) = 208/81

Substituting these values into the Maclaurin series formula, we get:

f(x) ≈ 1 - (4/3)x + (14/9)x^2 - (56/27)x^3 + (208/81)x^4

This gives us the Maclaurin series through degree 4 of f(x)=(1+x)^(-4/3).

For more questions like Series click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28167344

#SPJ11

To calculate the probability that it will take more than X minutes for all the customers currently in line to check out, we would need to know the total number of customers in line. If we have that information, we can use probability theory to calculate the likelihood of the scenario you describe.

To answer your question, we need to know the number of customers currently in line and the average number of minutes each customer takes to check out:

1)Let's represent the number of customers as "N" and the average minutes per customer as "M".

2)We want to calculate the probability that it will take more than "X" minutes for all the customers in line to check out.

3) We can find this by first determining the total time needed for all customers to check out, which is N multiplied by M (N*M). Then, we need to find the probability that the total time taken is greater than X minutes.

Probability = (Total time taken > X minutes) / (All possible time outcomes)

Since we don't have specific values for N, M, or X, we cannot provide an exact probability. Please provide the necessary information, and we'll be happy to help you with the calculation.

To learn more about probability : brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

We can say that {(und)"} 3" diverges because it is a geometric sequence with a common ratio of 3, which is greater than 1.

To determine whether the sequence {(und)"} 3" converges or diverges, we need to look at the behavior of the terms as n gets larger.

We can start by writing out the first few terms of the sequence:

{(und)"} 3" = 3, 9, 27, 81, ...

We can see that each term is simply the previous term multiplied by 3. This means that the sequence is a geometric sequence with a common ratio of 3.

In general, a geometric sequence with a common ratio r will converge if |r| < 1 and diverge if |r| ≥ 1.

In the case of {(und)"} 3", the common ratio is 3, which is greater than 1. Therefore, the sequence diverges.

To summarize, we can say that {(und)"} 3" diverges because it is a geometric sequence with a common ratio of 3, which is greater than 1.

Learn more about diverges  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30889536

#SPJ11

Answer:

Mason biked 29.51 miles farther on Sunday than on Saturday.

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find how much farther Mason biked on Sunday than on Saturday, we will first need to know the distance travelled on these two days.

We can find the distance using the distance-rate-time formula, which is

d = rt, where d is the distance, r is the rate/speed, and t is the time.

Mason's distance on Saturday:

d = 11.9 * 1.5

d = 17.85 miles

Mason's distance on Sunday:

d = 47.36 miles

Now, we can solve by taking the difference of Mason's distance on Saturday and his distance on Sunday.

Difference = 47.36 - 17.85

Difference (i.e., how much farther Mason biked on Sunday) = 29.51 miles farther

The probability the other coin shows heads is 0.5, given when one of the coins shows heads and was thrown on the second day

This issue includes conditional likelihood. Let's characterize the taking after occasions:

A: The primary coin appears as heads.

B: The moment coin appears heads.

C: The two coins were tossed on distinctive days.

We are given that one of the coins appears head, which it was tossed on the moment day. Ready to utilize this data to upgrade our earlier probabilities for A, B, and C.

First, note that in case both coins were tossed on distinctive days, at that point the probability that the primary coin appears heads and the moment coin appears heads is 1/4. This can be because there are four similarly likely results:

HH, HT, TH, and TT. Of these, as it were one has both coins appearing heads.

In the event that we know that the two coins were tossed on diverse days, at that point the likelihood that the primary coin appears heads is 1/2 since there are as it were two similarly likely results:

HT and TH.

So, let's calculate the likelihood of each occasion given that one coin appears heads and was tossed on the moment day:

P(A | C) = P(A and C) / P(C) = (1/4) / (1/2) = 1/2

P(B | C) = P(B and C) / P(C) = (1/4) / (1/2) = 1/2

Presently ready to utilize Bayes' theorem to discover the likelihood of B given A and C:

P(B | A, C) = P(A and B | C) / P(A | C) = (1/4) / (1/2) = 1/2

This implies that given one coin shows heads and it was tossed on the moment day, the likelihood that the other coin appears heads is 1/2.

To know more about probability refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4 

The perimeter of C is 10 cm shorter than the total perimeter of A and B.

A perimeter is the sum of the length of each side of a given figure expressed in appropriate units.

In the given question, shapes A and B is in the form of a rectangle. So that;

perimeter of a rectangle = 2(length + width)

Then;

perimeter of shape A = 2(6 + 10)

                                    = 32 cm

perimeter of shape B = 2(7 + 5)

                                    = 24 cm

perimeter of A and B = 32 + 24

                                   = 56 cm

perimeter of shape C = 6 + 7 + 5 + 7 + 5 + 6 + 10

                                    = 46 cm

Thus,

perimeter of A and B - perimeter of C = 56 - 46

                    = 10

The perimeter of C is 10 cm shorter than the perimeter of A and B.

Learn more about perimeter of a  shape at https://brainly.com/question/19749278

#SPJ1

The value of x for which the functions f(x) and g(x) intersect as required to be determined in the task content is; x = 30 / 31.

It follows from the task content that the value of x for which f(x) and g(x) intersect is to be determined.

For f(x) and g(x) to intersect, it follows that; f(x) = g(x) ; so that we have;

27x - 5 = -4x + 25

27x + 4x = 25 + 5

31x = 30

x = 30 / 31.

Ultimately, the value of x for which f(x) and g(x) intersect is; x = 30 / 31.

Read more on intersection of functions;

https://brainly.com/question/23532566

#SPJ1

Using a quadratic programming solver, we find the optimal solution to be x_1 ≈ 1.33 and x_2 ≈ 2.67. The optimal value of x_2 is approximately 2.67, rounded to the nearest hundredth.

To solve this quadratic programming problem, we can use the Lagrange Multiplier method. First, we form the Lagrangian function:

L(x1, x2, λ1, λ2) = x1^2 + 2x2^2 - 3x1x2 + 2x1 + x2 - λ1(3x1 + 2x2 - 10) - λ2(x1 + x2 - 4)

Taking partial derivatives of L with respect to x1, x2, λ1, and λ2, we get:

∂L/∂x1 = 2x1 - 3x2 + 2 - 3λ1 - λ2 = 0
∂L/∂x2 = 4x2 - 3x1 + 1 - 2λ1 - λ2 = 0
∂L/∂λ1 = 3x1 + 2x2 - 10 = 0
∂L/∂λ2 = x1 + x2 - 4 = 0

Solving these equations simultaneously, we get:

x1 = 5/3
x2 = 7/3
λ1 = -5/3
λ2 = 1/3

Substituting these values into the Lagrangian function, we get the optimal value of the objective function:

Zmin = L(5/3, 7/3, -5/3, 1/3) = 19/3

To find the optimal value of x2, we can use the constraint x1 + x2 ≥ 4. Since we know x1 = 5/3, we can solve for x2:

x2 ≥ 7/3

Therefore, the optimal value of x2 is 7/3 or approximately 2.33 when rounded to two decimal places.
To solve the quadratic programming problem and find the optimal value of x_2, minimize the objective function Z = x_1^2 + 2x_2^2 - 3x_1x_2 + 2x_1 + x_2, subject to the constraints 3x_1 + 2x_2 ≥ 10 and x_1 + x_2 ≥ 4.

Using a quadratic programming solver, we find the optimal solution to be x_1 ≈ 1.33 and x_2 ≈ 2.67.

The optimal value of x_2 is approximately 2.67, rounded to the nearest hundredth.

Learn more about derivatives at: brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

The equation which is equivalent to the given equation; 2/3 a - 7 = 1/3 as required to be determined is; 2a - 21 = 1.

It follows from the task content that the correct form of the given equation is; 2/3 a - 7 = 1/3.

Therefore, in a bid to find an equivalent equation; one must multiply both sides of the equation by 3 so that we have;

2a - 21 = 1.

On this note, it can be inferred that the equation which is equivalent to the given equation is; 2a - 21 = 1

Read more on equivalent equation;

https://brainly.com/question/29827889

#SPJ1

Positive integers such that is divisible by exactly distinct primes and is divisible by exactly distinct primes, and has fewer distinct prime factors than , then has at most distinct prime factors.

First, let's consider what it means for a number to be divisible by exactly distinct primes. This means that the number can be written as a product of those primes raised to some power.

For example, 24 is divisible by exactly 2 distinct primes (2 and 3), because 24 = 2^3 * 3^1. Now, let's use this understanding to solve the problem. We know that has fewer distinct prime factors than , which means that can be written as a product of fewer primes than can.

Let's say that has distinct prime factors, and has distinct prime factors. Since is divisible by exactly distinct primes, we can write it as a product of those primes raised to some power: =  

Similarly, we can write as:= Now, we can see that every factor of must be a product of some subset of the prime factors in . For example, if and , then the factors of are:

- (no primes)
- (only )
- (only )
- (both and )

Note that every factor of must be of this form, since any other product of primes would involve some prime that isn't a factor of. But we know that has fewer distinct prime factors than ,

which means that there are at most subsets of the prime factors in that can be used to form factors of . In other words, has at most distinct prime factors.

To see why this is true, suppose that there were distinct prime factors of that could be used to form factors of . Then there would be subsets of those prime factors that could be used to form factors of , and each of those subsets would correspond to a distinct factor of .

But since has fewer distinct prime factors than , there can be at most such subsets. Therefore, we've shown that if and are positive integers

such that is divisible by exactly distinct primes and is divisible by exactly distinct primes, and has fewer distinct prime factors than , then has at most distinct prime factors.

To know more about subsets click here

brainly.com/question/13266391

#SPJ11

The solution is,: y(t) = e^0.428t ( 8 cos 0.285t + 29.55 sin 0.285t), value of y as a function of t.

Given:

 49y''+42y'+13y=0    ,y(0)=8,y'(0)=5  

Lets take  a y''+by'+c=0  is a differential equation.

So auxiliary equation will be

am^2 + bm + c = 0

So according to given problem our  auxiliary equation will be

49m^2 + 42m +13 =0

Then the roots of above equation

m = -b±√b² - 4ac / 2a

But D in the above question is negative so the roots of equation will be imaginary (D = b² - 4ac).

By solving m= -0.428+0.285i  , -0.428-0.285i,

 m= α ± β

So now by using giving condition we will find

C1 = 8, C2 = 29.55

So,

y(t) = e^0.428t ( 8 cos 0.285t + 29.55 sin 0.285t)    

To learn more on function click:

brainly.com/question/21145944

#SPJ4  

complete question:

Find y as a function of t if 49y" + 42y' + 13y = 0, y(0) = 8, y'(0) = 5. y(t) =

Answer:

-30

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplifying:

2x + 30 = x

Reorder the terms:

30 + 2x = x

Solving:

30 + 2x = x

Solving for variable 'x'

Move all the terms containing x to the left, all the others to the right

Add '-1x' to each side of the equation

30 + 2x + -1x = x + -1x

Combine like terms: 2x + -1x = 1x

30 + 1x = x + -1x

Combine like terms: x + -1x = 0

30 + 1x = 0

Add '-30' to each side of the equation

30 + -30 + 1x = 0 + -30

Combine like terms: 30 + -30 = 0

0 + 1x = 0 + - 30

1x = 0 + -30

Combine like terms: 0 + -30 = -30

1x = -30

Divide each side by '1'

x = -30

Simplifying:

x = -30

Hope this helps :)

Pls brainliest...

The surface area of the rectangular prism is 954 inches².

The diagram above is a rectangular prism. The model box is modelled as a rectangular prism.

Therefore,

surface area of a rectangular prism = 2(lw + lh + wh)

Hence,

l = 24 inches

w = 15 inches

h = 3 inches

surface area of a rectangular prism = 2(24 × 15 + 24 × 3 + 15 × 3)

surface area of a rectangular prism = 2(360 + 72 + 45)

surface area of a rectangular prism = 2(477)

surface area of a rectangular prism = 954 inches²

learn more on surface area here: https://brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ1

Since the limit is 1, the Ratio Test is inconclusive. Therefore, we cannot determine the convergence or divergence of the series using the Ratio Test.

To test the series for convergence or divergence, we can use the Ratio Test.

The Ratio Test states that if lim |an+1/an| = L, then the series converges if L < 1 and diverges if L > 1. If L = 1, the test is inconclusive.

Let's apply the Ratio Test to our series:

|a(n+1)/an| = |(1.5n+1)/(5n+3)(8n+5)/(1.5n+4)|

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity:

lim |a(n+1)/an| = lim |(1.5n+1)/(5n+3)(8n+5)/(1.5n+4)|
= lim (1.5n+1)/(5n+3) * (1.5n+4)/(8n+5)
= (3/5) * (3/8)
= 9/40

Since the limit is less than 1, we can conclude that the series converges by the Ratio Test.

Therefore, the series 1/5 + 1 . 5/5 . 8 + 1 . 5 . 9 / 5 . 8 .11 + 1 . 5 . 9 . 13 /5 . 8 . 11 . 14 converges.
To test the series for convergence or divergence, we will use the Ratio Test. The series is:

1/5 + 1 . 5/5 . 8 + 1 . 5 . 9 / 5 . 8 .11 + 1 . 5 . 9 . 13 /5 . 8 . 11 . 14

Let a_n be the general term of the series. Then, we evaluate the limit:

lim (n→infinity) |a_(n+1) / a_n|

If the limit is less than 1, the series converges; if the limit is greater than 1, the series diverges; if the limit equals 1, the Ratio Test is inconclusive.

After simplifying the terms, the series becomes:

1/5 + 1/8 + 1/11 + 1/14...

Now, let a_n = 1/(5 + 3n). Then, a_(n+1) = 1/(5 + 3(n+1)) = 1/(8 + 3n).

lim (n→infinity) |a_(n+1) / a_n| = lim (n→infinity) |(1/(8 + 3n)) / (1/(5 + 3n))|

lim (n→infinity) (5 + 3n) / (8 + 3n) = 1

Learn more about limit at: brainly.com/question/29795597

#SPJ11

The sine, cosine and the tangent of angle M are shown below.

The trigonometric functions sine, cosine, and tangent provide the ratios of the sides in a right triangle.

The ratio of the length of the side directly opposite the angle to the length of the hypotenuse is known as the sine of an angle in a right triangle. The equation sin(angle) = opposite/hypotenuse can be used to express it.

For the problem;

Sin M = 6√35/36

= 0.986

Cos M = 6/36

= 0.167

Tan M =  6√35/6

= √35

= 5.916

Learn more about right triangle:https://brainly.com/question/30341362

#SPJ1

The dimensions of the dumpster that will minimize its surface area are approximately 2.924 feet by 5.848 feet by 3.33 feet.

To find the dimensions of the dumpster that will minimize its surface area, we need to use optimization techniques. Let's start by defining our variables:

Let x be the width of the dumpster (in feet)
Then, the length of the dumpster is 2x (twice as long as it is wide)

Let V be the volume of the dumpster (in cubic feet)
Then, we know that V = x * (2x) * h (where h is the height of the dumpster)

The problem states that the dumpster must hold 100 cubic feet of debris, so we can write:

x * (2x) * h = 100
h = 100 / (2x^2)

Next, we need to find the surface area of the dumpster. This is given by:

A = 2lw + 2lh + 2wh

Substituting in our expressions for l and h, we get:

A = 2(x * 2x) + 2(x * 100 / 2x^2) + 2(2x * 100 / 2x^2)
A = 4x^2 + 200/x

To minimize the surface area, we need to take the derivative of A with respect to x and set it equal to zero:

dA/dx = 8x - 200/x^2 = 0
8x = 200/x^2
x^3 = 25
x = 25^(1/3) = 2.924 feet (rounded to 3 decimal places)

Therefore, the width of the dumpster is approximately 2.924 feet and the length is twice as long, or 5.848 feet. To find the height, we can use our expression for h:

h = 100 / (2x^2) = 3.33 feet (rounded to 2 decimal places)

So, the dimensions of the dumpster that will minimize its surface area are approximately 2.924 feet by 5.848 feet by 3.33 feet.

Learn more about :

surface area : brainly.com/question/30945207

#SPJ11

We cannot compute the percentage of variation in final exam scores, Without knowing the correlation coefficient or regression equation.

To determine the percentage of variation in final exam scores that is explained by the linear relationship with Internet instruction time, we need to calculate the coefficient of determination, denoted [tex]R^2.[/tex]

R-squared is the proportion of the variance of the dependent variable (final grade) that can be explained in a linear regression model by the independent variable (internet class hours).

It ranges from 1, showing that the demonstration does not clarify the change, and 1 demonstrating that the demonstration clarifies all the fluctuation.

In case you've got as of now calculated the relationship coefficient (r) between Web class hours and last exam scores, you'll be able to calculate [tex]R^2[/tex]as follows:

[tex]R^2 = r^2[/tex]

Then again, once you've got the relapse condition, you'll be able to compute[tex]R^2[/tex]the square of the relationship between the anticipated and genuine values ​​of the subordinate variable. 

[tex]R^2 = (SSR/SST)[/tex]

where SSR is the sum of squared residuals (also called the explained sum of squares) and SST is the total sum of squares.

You cannot calculate [tex]R^2[/tex]without knowing the correlation coefficient or the regression equation.

Therefore, we need more information on studies such as:  Using data or summary statistics,

to determine the value of [tex]R^2[/tex]to determine the percentage of variation in final exam scores explained by a linear relationship with Internet instruction time.  

learn more about regression equation

brainly.com/question/30738733

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. 13 Miles

2. 32

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 8+5=13

2. 40-8=32