Answer:
C- The court did not recognize the Cherokee tribe as a sovereign nation.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court Case of Cherokee nation v. Georgia of 1831 was a case between the two parties after the Cherokee nation asked for the court to pass a federal injunction against the Georgian government and prevent it from acquiring lands that belong to them (The Cherokees). This case was denied as the court rules that the Cherokees were not an independent nation of its own and the court thus, cannot make any ruling over the issue.
The Cherokee Nation has been the residence of the people for ages. So, when the government of Georgia passed a law that allows people to have power or rights within the lands of the Cherokee people, the Cherokees began to fight back, resulting in the court case. But the Supreme Court denied the case, stating that the court had no jurisdiction over the dependent nation, referring to their relationship as something akin to "a ward and his guardian", thus refusing to pass any law or judgment to stop the Georgian government's intrusion into their lands. It stated that the Cherokees were a dependent people and thus, not free from any sovereignty or authority of the United States and its law.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
Read the following passages from Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlett Letter. Though this work is set in a puritan society, it’s very much a Romantic-era work. In the following passages, you should see elements of both Romanticism and Gothicism. As you read the passages, annotate them for elements of both Romanticism and Gothicism.
PASSAGE 1 The great black forest—stern as it showed itself to those who brought the guilt and troubles of the world into its bosom—became the playmate of the lonely infant, as well as it knew how. Sombre as it was, it put on the kindest of its moods to welcome her. It offered her the partridge-berries, the growth of the preceding autumn, but ripening only in the spring, and now red as drops of blood upon the withered leaves. These Pearl gathered, and was pleased with their wild flavor. The small denizens of the wilderness hardly took pains to move out of her path. A partridge, indeed, with a brood of ten behind her, ran forward threateningly, but soon repented of her fierceness, and clucked to her young ones not to be afraid. A pigeon, alone on a low branch, allowed Pearl to come beneath, and uttered a sound as much of greeting as alarm. A squirrel, from the lofty depths of his domestic tree, chattered either in anger or merriment,—for a squirrel is such a choleric and humorous little personage that it is hard to distinguish between his moods,—so he chattered at the child, and flung down a nut upon her head. It was a last year’s nut, and already gnawed by his sharp tooth. A fox, startled from his sleep by her light footstep on the leaves, looked inquisitively at Pearl, as doubting whether it were better to steal off, or renew his nap on the same spot. A wolf, it is said,—but here the tale has surely lapsed into the improbable,—came up, and smelt of Pearl’s robe, and offered his savage head to be patted by her hand. The truth seems to be, however, that the mother-forest, and these wild things which it nourished, all recognized a kindred wildness in the human child.
PASSAGE 2 The road, after the two wayfarers had crossed from the peninsula to the mainland, was no other than a footpath. It straggled onward into the mystery of the primeval forest. This hemmed it in so narrowly, and stood so black and dense on either side, and disclosed such imperfect glimpses of the sky above, that, to Hester’s mind, it imaged not amiss the moral wilderness in which she had so long been wandering. The day was chill and sombre. Overhead was a gray expanse of cloud, slightly stirred, however, by a breeze; so that a gleam of flickering sunshine might now and then be seen at its solitary play along the path. This flitting cheerfulness was always at the farther extremity of some long vista through the forest. The sportive sunlight—feebly sportive, at best, in the predominant pensiveness of the day and scene—withdrew itself as they came nigh, and left the spots where it had danced the drearier, because they had hoped to find them bright.
PRODUCE In this section, you will answer several analytical questions about the passages. Use specific references and/or quotations from the passages to support your answers. Be complete in your response.
1. Which passage is more Romantic? What specific details lead you to this decision? (Cite them specifically and explain how they demonstrate romantic ideas.)
2. Which passage is more Gothic? What specific details lead you to this decision? (Cite them specifically and explain how they demonstrate gothic ideas.)
3. What theme does passage #1 communicate about nature? Answer with one complete sentence
. 4. What theme does passage #2 communicate about nature? Answer with one complete sentence.
1. Pass 1 is more romantic. In passage 1 we are presented with the forest as a living element, a character with great influence, in addition to being a scenario. This is a strong element of romantic literature, which used to show nature as a living element within history. In addition, we can see another element of romantic literature, escapism, characterized by the flight from the real self and all the problems that surround it.
2. Passage 2 is more Gothic. In this passage we see the forest being portrayed as a dark and mysterious scenario that causes a certain terror and discomfort in its passengers. This is a strong element of Gothic literature that used to show nature as a place that can cause a lot of terror, melancholy and fear.
3. Passage 1 communicates that nature is welcoming, kind and invigorating.
The text shows how nature welcomed the boy in a maternal way, causing strong fun, joy and pleasure, even if he had problems and bad experiences.
4. Passage 2 communicates a chaustrophobic, somber and limiting theme about nature.
The text expresses a sense of imprisonment the moment the characters enter the forest. Passing a dark, mysterious and caustrophobic feeling, as if the forest was not there to do any good.
Even though we can say that Columbus did not discover anything new, why is his voyage across the Atlantic still seen as one of the key events in human history
Answer:
Christopher Columbus: Early Life
Christopher Columbus, the son of a wool merchant, is believed to have been born in Genoa, Italy, in 1451. When he was still a teenager, he got a job on a merchant ship. He remained at sea until 1476, when pirates attacked his ship as it sailed north along the Portuguese coast. The boat sank, but the young Columbus floated to shore on a scrap of wood and made his way to Lisbon, where he eventually studied mathematics, astronomy, cartography and navigation. He also began to hatch the plan that would change the world forever. The First Voyage
At the end of the 15th century, it was nearly impossible to reach Asia from Europe by land. The route was long and arduous, and encounters with hostile armies were difficult to avoid. Portuguese explorers solved this problem by taking to the sea: They sailed south along the West African coast and around the Cape of Good Hope.But Columbus had a different idea: Why not sail west across the Atlantic instead of around the massive African continent? The young navigator’s logic was sound, but his math was faulty. He argued (incorrectly) that the circumference of the Earth was much smaller than his contemporaries believed it was; accordingly, he believed that the journey by boat from Europe to Asia should be not only possible, but comparatively easy via an as-yet undiscovered Northwest Passage.
Ernest Campbell and Thomas Pettigrew (1959) discovered that many ministers who supported desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas did not use their pulpits to air their (unpopular) views for fear of losing contributions and church members. This is a real world example of the power of ________ to exacerbate prejudice and discrimination.
Answer:The answer to the question is normative conformity
Explanation:
Ernest Campbell and Thomas Pettigrew's discovery about many ministers is an example of normative conformity to exacerbate prejudice and discrimination.
What is normative conformity?The type of conformity known as normative conformity is altering one's conduct in order to blend in with the group. When we express our opinions or behave in ways that help us to be accepted or keep us from being isolated or rejected by others, we are exhibiting normative conformity.
As the ministers who supported desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas feared losing church members and financial support, refrained from speaking out in public. This normative conformity served to reinforce prejudice and discrimination.
Therefore, Ernest Campbell and Thomas Pettigrew's discovery is an real world example of normative conformity.
To learn more about normative conformity, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12634608
#SPJ2
HELP!! How did Howard Taft's Dollar Diplomacy differ from Teddy Roosevelt's foreign
policy approach?
A. Taft insisted on the United States' right and responsibility to police
the hemisphere against European encroachment.
B. Taft renounced American intervention in foreign affairs and
withdrew federal support for overseas financial investments.
c. Taft sought to secure American interests through foreign aid
rather than military intervention.
D. Taft relied on missionary work and moral propaganda to secure
American influence in relevant regions.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Roosevelt's "Big Stick" foreign policy relies more on the military that threatens force while Taft's Dollar Diplomacy ensure the financial stability of a region.
Which case allowed for the incorporation of the rights described in the
Second Amendment?
O A. Mapp v. Ohio
O B. McDonald v. Chicago
O c. Gitlow v. New York
O D. Gideon v. Wainwright
Answer:
McDonald v. Chicago
Explanation:
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment extends the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms to the states, at least for traditional, lawful purposes such as self-defense.
Facts
Four Chicago residents, including Otis McDonald, challenged a Chicago ordinance that required the registration of firearms while accepting no registrations that post-dated the implementation of a handgun ban in 1982. The law also required the re-registration of handguns with the payment of an annual fee and prevented any individual from registering a gun again once its registration had lapsed. McDonald, who was 76 years old and a former maintenance engineer, pointed out that his neighborhood in Morgan Park was prone to gang-related violence as a result of drug trafficking. He had been the victim of five burglaries, so he felt that he needed a handgun for the purposes of self-defense. (He owned shotguns for hunting but did not want to use those.)
Building on the Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), McDonald sought to expand the Second Amendment's application to state and local governments through selective incorporation. (Since Heller had unfolded in the District of Columbia, the Bill of Rights was directly applicable to this federally controlled area.) This meant that the right to bear arms must be deemed fundamental because of its deeply rooted presence in national history and traditions or its inherent role in protecting liberty. McDonald also offered the novel argument that the Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause should be allowed to apply the Bill of Rights to state and local governments, overturning the Court's 1873 decision in the Slaughter-House Case. This doctrinal shift would have allowed the Bill of Rights to be applied directly to non-federal governments without the need for incorporation. It could have had an impact on other parts of the Bill of Rights to which incorporation had not yet been applied.
Issues & Holdings
Issue: Whether the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires the application of the Bill of Rights in its entirety to state and local governments.
Holding: No. The holding in the Slaughter-House Case remains in effect, and incorporation is the appropriate way to selectively apply provisions in the Bill of Rights beyond the federal government.
Opinions
Majority
Samuel A. Alito, Jr. (Author)
John G. Roberts, Jr.
Antonin Scalia
Anthony M. Kennedy
Clarence Thomas
Declining to address the Privileges or Immunities Clause component of McDonald's argument, Alito applied the incorporation doctrine to find that state and local governments are subject to the Second Amendment through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He reminded readers that the right to bear arms is not unqualified and that the restrictions recognized in the Heller decision remain intact, such as bans on straw purchases, restrictions on use in school zone and federal buildings, and bans on use by convicted criminals or the mentally ill.
Concurrence
Clarence Thomas (Author)
Thomas would have accepted McDonald's bolder argument and overruled the Slaughter-House Case, finding that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment automatically applied all of the protections in the Bill of Rights to states and cities.
Concurrence
Antonin Scalia (Author)
Dissent
John Paul Stevens (Author)
Arguing against the principle of incorporation, Stevens would have reverted to the narrower 19th-century understanding of this doctrine.
Dissent
Stephen G. Breyer (Author)
These dissenters felt that there was no fundamental right to individual self-defense guaranteed by the Second Amendment. (Breyer had written a similar dissent in Heller.)
Case Commentary
Despite the holding that the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments, this decision emphasizes that provisions of the Bill of Rights should be incorporated only if they are part of the national tradition or fundamental to historical visions of liberty. Whether this language will serve as a practical limit on incorporation is not certain.
As with Heller, the Court did not state the standard of review that was appropriate for Second Amendment cases. Like that earlier decision, it spawned a plethora of cases challenging various gun laws, since the highly case-specific nature of the jurisprudence in this area means that each type of law must be analyzed separately.
States mainly raise revenue by
Answer:
States mainly raise revenue by collecting taxes from citizens, by collecting other states' taxes, and by sharing in taxes that other states have collected.
Explanation:
States primarily generate income by collecting taxes from their residents, collecting taxes from other states, and splitting taxes that other states have already collected.
How do States mainly raise revenue?The annual budget of the government specifies the expenditures that must be made in order to cover them. As was already mentioned, it aims to achieve its goal primarily through tax revenue collection.
The nation achieves a budget surplus if the government raises more money in taxes during a given year than is required to cover its expenses.
Nonetheless, the federal government runs a deficit if tax revenue does not equal annual expenses.
The main source of revenue for the American government is taxation. The U.S. Congress is granted the authority to allocate and collect taxes under Section 8 of the first article of the Constitution. Tax revenue comes from many different places.
Therefore, taxes on income, Social Security and Medicare contributions, as well as corporate revenues are the main sources of funding for the government.
Learn more about government income below;
https://brainly.com/question/11084508
#SPJ5
Full question;
States mainly raise revenue by
collecting taxes from citizens.
collecting taxes from other states.
sharing in taxes collected by other states.
sharing in taxes collected by the US government.
I NEED THE ANSWER ASAPPP!!!
Which of these statements best summarizes the purpose of affirmative action?
• To make the college admissions process equally difficult for all students.
• To achieve racial equality by giving preferential treatment to minorities.
• To end segregation by forcing schools to allow minority applicants.
Answer:
To achieve racial equality by giving preferential treatment to minorities.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Answer Quick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(What idea did George Washington introduce as president of the United States?
OA The US president's first two years should be the most productive.
OB. US presidents should play an important role in maintaining world peace.
OCUS presidents should not belong to any political party.
OD. US presidents should run for election for only two terms.
Answer:
Us president should run for election for only 2 terms.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Help me pls idk how to due
Answer:Show the choices
Explanation:
(LC) Which group was associated with the Black Power movement? (1 point) a. Black Panther Party b. National Urban League c. Black Muslims d. Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee
Answer: The correct answer is A .
Explanation:
Answer:
(A) black panther party
Explanation:
TOOK THE TEST GOT IT
What type of map is this? A. topographical B. historical C. climate D. population density
For which was James Meredith noted?
Answer:
is noted for the leading of 1966 "March against fear" from Memphis to Jackson in protest of physical violence that African Americans faced while excercising their rights to vote.
Explanation:
Answer:
Meredith was the first African American student to enroll in the University of Mississippi.
Explanation:
Gradpoint
Property rights are important to individuals because they provide the needed to secure credit. This allows people to invest in small businesses or pay for education. Property rights also ensure use of resources. That’s because individuals will use their resources carefully and wisely to profit.
Answer: Property rights are important to individuals because they provide the collateral needed to secure credit. This credit allows people to invest in small businesses or pay for education. Property rights also ensure efficient use of resources. That’s because individuals will use their resources carefully and wisely to maximize profit.
Explanation:
People value their property rights because they can use them as security for loans. This credit enables individuals to finance their schooling or small business investments. The effective use of resources is also ensured by property rights. People will use their resources carefully and wisely to maximize profit, which explains this.
What is a Property Right?A property right is the only authority to determine how a resource is used, regardless of whether it is controlled by the government or by private individuals. Through social exclusion and governmental compulsion, society validates the uses that the owner of the property right has selected. In the United States, if the government possesses a resource, Congress or the executive agency it has charged with that authority define the rules that must be adhered to by the agent who decides how to use it.
What are the main objectives of Property rights?The main accomplishment of property rights is to prevent destructive competition for ownership of economic resources. Clear-cut and sufficiently protected property rights support peaceful competition over aggressive conflict.
Private property rights' scope and depth have a significant impact on how people vie for control of scarce resources. Market exchange values gain sway when private property rights become more complete. The status and characteristics of those vying for a resource are less important because the price may be changed to counteract their influence. In other words, discrimination costs more when property rights are more comprehensive.
To learn more about private property refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/23031296
#SPJ2
Read this excerpt from Chapter 2 of The Scarlet Letter using comprehension strategies.
A blessing on the righteous Colony of the Massachusetts, where iniquity is dragged out into the sunshine!
What is the meaning of the word "iniquity"?
wickedness, sin
mistakes, errors
belongings, possessions
solitude, loneliness
4
Answer: The meaning of "iniquity" is wickedness and sin.
Explanation: Immoral or grossly unfair behavior.
Answer:
its d
Explanation:
Why is Giovanni Bellini known as the painter of natural light?
Answer:
Bellini was one of the most influential Venetian artists. He lived and worked in Venice all his life; his career spanned 65 years. He is celebrated for his pioneering portrayal of natural light, seen in such works as 'The Agony in the Garden', for his tender and graceful pictures of the Virgin and for his altarpieces.
Answer:
Bellini’s ability to portray outdoor light was so skillful that the viewer can tell not only the season of the year but also almost the hour of the day.
Explanation:
Please give me context for this: Analyze the international and domestic challenges the United States faced between 1968 and 1974, and evaluate how President Richard Nixon’s administration responded to them.
Answer:
the answer is 1962
Explanation:
Answer: This is the essay I submitted or this prompt.
Explanation:
Which characteristic most differentiated the Soviet Union's communist
government from Germany's Nazi fascist government?
O A. The Soviet Union established an economy based on
collectivization
B. The Soviet Union attempted to control its citizens' thoughts and
beliefs.
C. The Soviet Union subjected ethnic minorities to persecution and
violence.
D. The Soviet Union imprisoned or executed many political
dissidents.
Answer:
A. The Soviet Union established an economy based on
collectivization
After the secession of South Carolina, how many states seceded before
Lincoln was inaugurated as President?
•6
•5
•4
•3
Answer:
After the secession of South Carolina, 6 more states seceded before Lincoln was inaugurated as President.
Explanation:
When Republican Abraham Lincoln won in the 1860 presidential election, many in the south believed that his government would put an end to the legality of slavery in the United States, thus threatening its economic stability and the profitability of its businesses, which were based eminently in slave labor. For this reason, and in view of these fears, on December 24, 1860, South Carolina separated from the rest of the country.
From that time until February 1861, 6 new states separated from the Union: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. These states along with South Carolina were the ones that formally founded the Confederate States of America on February 4, 1861.
What was the result of the battle at Shiloh?
Explanation:
The cost of the victory was high. Grant’s and Buell’s forces totaled about 62,000, of which 1,754 were killed, 8,408 were wounded, and 2,885 were captured or missing for a total of 13,047 casualties. Of 45,000 Confederates engaged, 1,723 were killed, 8,012 wounded, and 959 missing for a total of 10,694 casualties.
In the election of 1864, candidate George McClellan promised to
a.
crush the South swiftly.
b.
stop the fighting and negotiate.
c.
nullify the Emancipation Proclamation.
d.
punish the South at war’s end.
Answer: B. Stop the fighting and negotiate
QUESTION: Explain the difference between a frameshift mutation and a base substitution mutation.Thanks!
Answer:
The changes in the single base or nucleotide in the nucleotide sequence and thus changing its complementary base also it is called point mutations, while when there are insertions or deletions of more than one base pair in the nucleotide sequence it is known as frameshift mutations.
The Civil War was the _____ conflict the United States has ever fought.
most controversial
deadliest
longest
costliest
Answer:
why Hot try deadliest, because a lot Americans fight each other, and this war have the most death rate too
Answer:
Deadliest
Explanation:
The Civil War maintains the highest American casualty total of any conflict. In its first 100 years of existence, over 683,000 Americans lost their lives, with the Civil War accounting for 623,026 of that total (91.2%).
All of the following contributed to the downfall of the Ming dynasty EXCEPT
a. weak rulers.
poor crop yields.
b. peasaht unrest.
d. European political ideas.
Answer:
a European political ideas
identify and write any four items that would not be found at home if the wheele had not been invinted
How does the periodic table indicate the number of valence electrons an
element has?
A. By the group number of the B columns
B. By the group number of the A columns
C. By the row number
D. By the period number
Answer:
B. By the group number of the A columns
Explanation:
Valence electrons which is a term that describes the number of electrons in the highest occupied energy level for an element helps to categories the elements into groups.
Hence, based on Chemical Abstracts Service, CAS grouping, it is shown or concluded that the periodic table indicate the number of valence electrons an element has by the group number of the A columns
Research the immigration of the Polish, the Irish, and the Chinese to the United States. Complete the chart with information about when the majority of this group immigrated, where they settled, what challenges they encountered, and what contributions they made to American society. Polish Irish Chinese Year of major immigration Location of settlement Challenges they faced Contributions made to American society
Answer:
Immigrants faced problem of hatred and social problems in US.
Explanation:
Immigration of the Polish to US started in 18th century and high immigration was recorded in the year 1870. Mostly they are settled in Texas and Chicago. Immigration of the Irish to US started in 1820 and up to 1840, 2.2 millions of Irish people migrated to US. They are settled in Boston and New York. immigration of the Chinese to US started in 1838 and high immigration was recorded in the year 1850. They were settled in California and states west of the Rocky Mountains. Problem faced by Chinese and Polish immigrants were hatred by anti-immigrants riots and pressure. Unsanitary conditions and the social problems such as violence, alcoholism and crime were the problems faced by Irish people. These immigrants bring a big change in the culture of the American people in American society.
What is rhetoric? and what role does it play in Julius Caesar? discuss
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, which along with grammar and logic, is one of the three ancient arts of discourse. Rhetoric aims to study the capacities of writers or speakers needed to inform, persuade, or motivate particular audiences in specific situations.
2. Rhetoric. Perhaps Julius Caesar's most famous and important scene is Act III, Scene 2, in which Brutus defends the decision to kill Caesar, arguing that it is best for Rome. ... Both speeches are examples of rhetoric, as the speakers try to use their words to make the crowd agree with their point of view.
Who was the Japanese ere allied with during World War ll?
Answer:
Italy
Explanation:
In September 1940, Japan signed the Tripartite Pact with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, in which they agreed to assist one another should any of them be attacked by a country not already involved in the war.
After World War II the U.S. economy was hard hit and did not do very well. TRUE OR FALSE
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Yes the economy did drop by 13% lower in 1947 than in 1944.
The Answer is
True on edge 2021
Part C
How was Augusto Pinochet viewed by the people of his or her nation? How do you know what the public opinion was? You
might need to find outside sources to answer this question. List any sources you consulted along with your answer.
Answer:
Augusto Pinochet was a Chilean dictator, who held the de facto presidency of Chile between 1973 and 1990, through the imposition of a military regime that greatly limited the civil liberties of its citizens, carrying out an internal dirty war and a political persecution of leftist political parties. In economic matters, his government carried out liberal measures, seeking to ally himself with the Western Bloc in the framework of the Cold War.
Today, the majority of Chilean society considers that their government was bad, because of the constant human rights abuses committed in the country, where political opponents of their regime were tortured, kidnapped and murdered.
However, parts of the right in Chile still have a positive view of Pinochet. They recognize him for having contributed to economic development. Since the right did not like the development of Chile in the socialist leadership under Allende, the right also recognizes him for having interrupted this development.
Some political analysts believe that the Pinochet regime can be described as fascist, while others believe that Pinochet's liberal economic policies mean that the regime cannot be defined as fascist.