Answer:
Explanation:
Russia* 3,972,400 3,999,364 km² including Crimea. 17,098,242 km² including North Asia while excluding Crimea.
2 Ukraine 603,628
3 France 551,695 643,801 km² when the overseas departments are included.
4 Spain 498,468 505,992 km² when the Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla are included.
5 Sweden 450,295
6 Norway 385,178 This includes Svalbard and Jan Mayen[1]
7 Germany 357,386
8 Finland 338,145
9 Poland 312,685
10 Italy 301,338
11 United Kingdom* 242,495 260,665 km² when the British Overseas Territories (except British Antarctic Territory) are included.
12 Romania 238,397
13 Belarus 207,600
14 Greece 131,940
15 Bulgaria 110,994
16 Iceland 102,775
17 Hungary 93,030
18 Portugal 91,568
19 Austria 83,858
20 Czech Republic 78,866
21 Serbia 77,453 88,361 km² including Kosovo
22 Ireland 70,273
23 Lithuania 65,300
24 Latvia 64,589
25 Croatia 56,594
26 Bosnia and Herzegovina 51,129
27 Slovakia 49,036
28 Estonia 45,339
29 Denmark 44,493 This includes Faroe Islands; 2,210,579 km² including Greenland
30 Switzerland 41,290
31 Netherlands 41,198 Excluding Caribbean Netherlands, Aruba, Curacao and Sint Maarten.
32 Moldova 33,846
33 Belgium 30,510
34 Albania 28,748
35 North Macedonia 25,713
36 Turkey* 23,507 783,562 km² including Asian part
37 Slovenia 20,273
38 Montenegro 13,812
39 Kosovo 10,908 Partially recognised state
40 Azerbaijan* 6,960 86,600 km² including Asian part
41 Luxembourg 2,586
42 Georgia* 2,428 69,700 km² including Asian part
43 Andorra 468
44 Malta 316
45 Liechtenstein 160
46 San Marino 61
47 Monaco 2.02
48 Vatican City
14. The one of the most prosperous province in India.
1)Satara
2)Pune
3)Bengal
4)Chennai
Answer:
satara
Explanation:
branless me please if i am wrong
Culture affects the way people conduct which of the following activities?
i. Practicing important traditions.
ii. Creating political organizations.
iii Meeting basic needs for survival.
A. i. only
B. i. and ii.
C. i. and iii.
D i., il., and iii.
Which statement was true of both Spanish and Anglo settlements in Texas?
A.
Both were found along the Gulf Coast near Matagorda Bay.
B.
Both built towns on the banks of the Brazos River in East Texas.
C.
Both centered on East Texas although their methods of settlement were different.
D.
Both concentrated most of their efforts around present-day San Antonio.
Answer:
your mom
Explanation:
your mom is big
what is the nationalism
Helpppppp !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer: To stop Senate corruption, progressives wanted the direct election of senators by all state voters. In 1912 Congress passed the direct-election amendment. In 1913 it was ratified, becoming the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution.
Explanation:
Which statement about the Amazon rain forest is false?
0 It is considerably smaller today than it was a century ago because of cutting and burning.
O It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
O More that 500 species of trees grow in a single two-and-a-half-acre plot.
O Scientists believe species there could hold the key to medical breakthroughs.
Answer: It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
Explanation: I hope this helps :) You've got this!
Answer:
O It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
Explanation:
this is correct
What anti-federalist argument does madison counter in this essay?
Answer: " that of the expanse of the United States being too big for Republican Government to work"
hope that helps
How was Mexico's struggle for independence similar to and different from the founding of the United States?
Answer:
Mexico was first populated more than 13000 years ago before the Spanish conquered and colonized the country in the 16th century.
how dose stocks help sauce in flavor
Answer: they form the base for many soups and sauces. This extracts the flavor, aroma, color, body, and nutrients of the ingredients. stock is made from simmering bones with vegetables, minimally adding herbs & salt to let the true flavor of the simmering, also stock can also be boiled to eliminate some of the liquid, which thickens the stock and intensifies the flavor.
What is a personal staff member with office management duties
Answer:
administrative assistant.
Explanation:
Office Manager Job Description: Top Duties and Qualifications
An Office Manager,or Business Manager,is responsible for overseeing the daily operations of an office and its various departments. Their duties include communicating with department heads, relaying important information or policy changes from upper management and implementing incentives to enhance employee productivity.
Office Manager duties and responsibilities
Office Managers may be the first point of contact for internal and external parties for your office, which may impact some customer service and communication elements of their job duties. Duties and responsibilities will vary depending on an organization’s size, but might include:
Overseeing the work of all office employees to ensure they work productively and meet deadlines and company standards Counseling any employees struggling in their roles Answering telephone calls and emails from customers and clients and directing them to relevant staff Creating an office budget and ensuring all employees follow it Monitoring office supplies and ordering new stationery, furniture, appliances and electronics as required Interviewing and training new office employees and organizing their employment paperwork Organizing maintenance companies to keep the office clean and safe and ensure its appliances are in good working order Reporting office progress to senior management and working with them to improve office operations and proceduresHow does Anne feel when she thinks of her friend Lies?
A hope
B hatred
C guilt
Explain the benefits and costs of a free trade agreement
Answer:
Benefits:
- Increases access to higher-quality and lower priced goods
- Higher growth rate
- Improves efficiency and innovation
- Drives competitiveness
- Promotes fairness
Cons:
- increasing job outsourcing
- poor working conditions
- degradation of natural resources
Explanation:
Which statements about how Federalists and Anti-Federalists felt about the Constitution are true?
Choose all answers that are correct.
A.The Anti-Federalists demanded that the Constitution include a bill of rights to guarantee personal freedoms.
B.The Federalists at first argued that a bill of rights was not needed in the Constitution.
C.The Anti-Federalists created a second draft of the Constitution, this time adding a bill of rights, and ratified their version.
D.The Federalists finally relented and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution, which cleared the way for its ratification.
Answer:
The Federalists finally relented and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution, which cleared the way for its ratification.
The Anti-Federalists demanded that the Constitution include a bill of rights to guarantee personal freedoms.
HELP ME OUT PLEASE!!
Why did the framers feel it was necessary at times to amend the Constitution?
A) amending the Constitution can reflect changing times, beliefs, and social conditions.
B) amending the Constitution would allow for tyranny.
C) amending the Constitution shows other countries how strong the U.S. government is.
D) amending the Constitution allows for a smooth transition of power between political parties.
Answer:
C would be your answer
Explanation:
the men who wrote the Constitution, wanted the amendment process to be difficult. They believed that a long and complicated amendment process would help create stability in the United States. Because it is so difficult to amend the Constitution, amendments are usually permanent.
1) What was the Yazoo Land Act?
2) Why did the Act become a Scandal?
3) Why were the legislators in the picture burning the law after it had already been repealed?
4) What did that message send to the public?
Answer:
You know sometimes reading the lesson really helps you progress in school and makes it alot easier on you so you dont have to be here
Explanation:
What was the reasoning of the United States government for placing thousands of Japanese Americans into internment camps?
A.
Japanese Americans were quarantined to prevent a small pox outbreak.
B.
The U.S government wanted to train Japanese Americans to fight in the war.
C.
The U.S. government wanted to offer protection to Japanese Americans.
D.
Many Americans were concerned about the loyalty of Japanese Americans.
Answer:
D. Many Americanas were concerned about the loyalty of Japanese Americans
Explanation:
so this was during WWII where we were fighting Japan. so the government decided to enact racist policy putting them into camps.
1. Explain why the North was in a better position to feed their troops even though
the South's major industry was agriculture.
who is asteria and what does it mean
give info about that
help asap
Answer:
Asteria earned a $27,000 salary as an employee in 2020. How much should her employer have withheld from her paycheck for FICA taxes
The US government encourage American industry in the late
nineteenth century by creating protective tariffs."
True or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
15 PTS How did the United States entry into World War I change the culture and international political policies of the country?
Answer:
World War I was the "war to end all wars." It had major consequences on Americans both at home and abroad.
Explanation:
08.02 lesson summary and assessment
World history
Answer:
Where is the question???????
Native Americans in the Pampas and the
Andes grew all types of food in their early
history.
True
False
Which actions by the US government is protected by the fifth amendment
Answer:
the right to a grand jury, forbids “double jeopardy
Which Renaissance artist created a bronze statue of David?
Please help!!
Your answer is → sculptor Donatello
Answer: sculptor Donatello
Explanation:
David is the title of two statues of the biblical hero David by the Italian early Renaissance sculptor Donatello. They consist of an early work in marble of a clothed figure (1408–09), and a far more famous bronze figure
What are 2 similarities between Hispanic culture and American culture ?
Explanation:
Both countries believe in the value of education, both teach the same subjects, many of the clothes we wear are the same as well as similar food and a value of religion plus much of American and Mexican culture blend together in certain places in the US which also makes the transition to American culture easier.Answer:
the two countries believe in the value of education
and teach the same subjects in school and college
and the clothes fashion are kinda same
and food is similler .
Based on this map, why were Spain and Portugal initially more successful at Atlantic exploration than many other European states?
1. They dominated Mediterranean trade routes and wanted to extend this power into the Atlantic.
2.They were two of the westernmost European states, both located very close to Africa.
3.They were both Catholic kingdoms funded by the pope.
Answer:
I think 1
Explanation:
Im not 100% sure thought
What do you know already about the United States Constitution?
Answer:
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. This founding document, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government.Explanation:
Limiting expression of personal opinions or beliefs is a proper function on government
True False ?
Answer:
So, no, the government can't limit it. False, I think? (I am kinda confused on your question, so, I gave the best answer I could)
Explanation:
The First Amendment guarantees our right to free expression and free association, which means that the government does not have the right to forbid us from saying what we like and writing what we like; we can form clubs and organizations, and take part in demonstrations and rallies.
What does it mean for something to be ironic
Answer: when what actually happens turns out to be completely different from what would be expected
Explanation:
What are the challenges we face today to uphold the rule of law? What about in the future?
Answer:
Anyone who holds that what matters most in politics is having the right people in power and not how power should be constrained will be unconvinced of the value of the rule of law. Neither will anyone who believes that institutions of public power are merely instruments of the ruling class that need to be dismantled rather than merely constrained. For the majority of modern democratic societies, however, the rule of law’s requirement that both rulers and the ruled be accountable to the law is of unquestionable value. To be sure, in the modern world, it is the liberal tradition that values the rule of law most highly. Liberals who are concerned with ways of protecting (and realizing) liberty in some form and averting threats to it view the rule of law as an overarching source of security. Nonetheless, there is substantial disagreement even among liberals over what exactly counts as a faithful application of the term and, even when that is pinned down, how it is to be accomplished.
In itself, the notion of the rule of law is not a faithful description of any state of affairs but a complex ideal that is even more complex to realize. Thus, there is reason to be skeptical about whether societies necessarily benefit from all that might be invoked under the term. The independence of the judiciary, for instance, is clearly a problem if the independence is misused to foster the sectoral privileges of judicial personnel or to allow unchallenged interpretations of the law. Heavy emphasis on the formal aspects of the rule of law—for example, on procedural justice—may distract from the content and consequences of those laws. Critics of a strictly formal conception of the rule of law argue that too much attention to legal process generates significant vices of its own in the form of exaggerated legalism and neglect of the political or real-world dimensions of legal conflicts. Excessive veneration of the law and legal procedures may be too costly if it inhibits independent social assessments of the merits of a given policy proposal or if the official mandate of “blindness” gives legitimacy to actions performed “according to the law” even when most people would oppose such acts. Some writers have charged, moreover, that the increasing domain of judges and lawyers—indeed, their encroachment into areas previously left to politicians and the electorate—entails the loss of much that is politically and democratically valuable.
In short, too much emphasis on procedures for preventing arbitrariness can lead to subverting the doing of justice according to what might otherwise find support in the rule of law, and the legal strictures then become themselves a form of arbitrariness that is no more legitimate. On the other hand, those who defend the negative value of the rule of law object to more substantive understandings of the ideal on the grounds that morally ambitious aspirations about the rule of law threaten to purge the concept of its specificity and usefulness. They argue that to open the concept to a whole host of extralegal considerations about substantive justice and wider societal goals is to conflate ideas about “the rule of law” with notions about “the rule of good law,” such that any distinction between the two is reduced to nothing. As a consequence, no discussion of the rule of law can be complete without some philosophical reflection on law, including on its purpose and meaning.