y-4=-3(x+2)


y= -3/2x+1


y-1=-3x


3x+y=1

The probability that a whole number between 1 and 12 selected at random is a multiple of two or three is 7/12, or approximately 0.58.
To find the probability that a whole number between 1 and 12 selected at random is a multiple of two or three, we need to first determine the number of possible outcomes that meet this criteria.

The multiples of two between 1 and 12 are 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The multiples of three between 1 and 12 are 3, 6, 9, and 12. However, we need to be careful not to count 6 and 12 twice. Therefore, the total number of possible outcomes that meet the criteria of being a multiple of two or three is 7 (2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10).

Next, we need to determine the total number of possible outcomes when selecting a whole number between 1 and 12 at random. This is simply 12, as there are 12 whole numbers in this range.

Therefore, the probability that a whole number between 1 and 12 selected at random is a multiple of two or three is 7/12, or approximately 0.58.

In summary, the probability of selecting a whole number between 1 and 12 at random that is a multiple of two or three is 7/12.

learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/6649771

#SPJ11

The logarithm base 9 of 0.877 is approximately equal to -0.0607 (rounded to four decimal places).

To use the change of base rule to discover the logarithm of 0.877 with base 9, we are able to rewrite it the use of a more familiar base which includes 10 or e. let's use base 10 for this case:

log base 9 of 0.877 = log base 10 of 0.877 / log base 10 of 9

using the a calculator, we can discover that:

log base 10 of 0.877 ≈ -0.0579919

log base 10 of 9 = 0.9542425

Substituting those values into the equation above, we get:

log base nine of 0.877 ≈ (-0.0579919) / (0.9542425) ≈ -0.060742

Therefore, the logarithm base 9 of 0.877 is approximately equal to -0.0607 Learn more about logarithm:-

https://brainly.com/question/30340014

#SPJ4

If marbles of the same color are indistinguishable, then we can treat each color as one "block" of marbles. Therefore, we have three blocks - one with 3 red marbles, one with 4 yellow marbles, and one with 4 green marbles.

The number of ways to arrange these blocks in a line is simply the number of ways to rearrange the 3 blocks. This is given by 3! which is equal to 6, Within each block, the marbles of the same color are indistinguishable, so we don't need to worry about arranging them.

Therefore, the total number of ways to arrange the marbles in a line is 6, Since marbles of the same color are indistinguishable, we will use the formula for permutations with indistinguishable items. The formula is:

Total permutations = n! / (n1! * n2! * n3! ... nk!) Using the formula, the number of ways to arrange the marbles in a line is:
Total permutations = 11! / (3! * 4! * 4!) = 39,916,800 / (6 * 24 * 24) = 13,860 So, the boy can arrange the marbles in 13,860 different ways if marbles of the same color are indistinguishable.

To know more about indistinguishable:- https://brainly.com/question/29434580

#SPJ11

The length of one side of the square is 24/7 cm.

Let the side length of the square be x.

Since the square has one side on the hypotenuse of triangle ABC and a vertex on each of the two legs, we can form two smaller right triangles within the larger triangle ABC.
Label the vertices of the square touching legs AB and AC as D and E, respectively.

Triangle ADE is similar to triangle ABC by AA similarity (both have a right angle and angle A is common).
Set up a proportion using the side lengths:

AD/AB = DE/AC, or (6-x)/6 = x/8.
Cross-multiply to find 8(6-x) = 6x.
Simplify to 48 - 8x = 6x.
Add 8x to both sides to get 48 = 14x.
Divide by 14 to find x = 48/14, which simplifies to x = 24/7.
For similar question on length.

https://brainly.com/question/16552139

#SPJ11

h'(1) is equal to -2V54.

To find h'(1), we need to differentiate the function h(x) with respect to x and evaluate it at x = 1.

Given:

h(x) = V54f(x)

f(1) = -5

f'(1) = -2

First, let's find the derivative of h(x) using the chain rule:

h'(x) = d/dx [V54f(x)] = V54 * d/dx [f(x)]

Now, we substitute x = 1 into the expression to evaluate h'(1):

h'(1) = V54 * d/dx [f(x)] | x=1

Since we know f(1) = -5 and f'(1) = -2, we can substitute these values:

h'(1) = V54 * d/dx [f(x)] | x=1

      = V54 * f'(1)

      = V54 * (-2)

      = -2V54

Therefore, h'(1) is equal to -2V54.

To know more about differentiate refer here

https://brainly.com/question/13958985#

#SPJ11

The volume of the cylinder is approximately 188.5 cubic units.

The formula for the volume of a cylinder to solve this problem:

Volume = π x r² x h

Given that the height of the cylinder is 15 and the radius is 2. We can use the diameter to calculate the radius as well since the radius is half the diameter. So, the radius is 4 / 2 = 2.

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

Volume = π x 2² x 15

Volume = 60π

Using a calculator and approximating π as 3.14, we get:

Volume ≈ 188.5 cubic units

Therefore, the volume of the cylinder is approximately 188.5 cubic units.

To know more about volume follow

https://brainly.com/question/1370280

#SPJ1

The amplitude of the periodic function represented by the graph is given as follows:

9 units.

The amplitude of a function is represented by the difference between the maximum value of the function and the minimum value of the function.

The maximum and minimum values for the function in this problem are given as follows:

Hence the amplitude of the function is given as follows:

11 - 2 = 9 units.

More can be learned about the amplitude of a function at https://brainly.com/question/23713359

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer is actually 4.

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the distance from the max to the minimum is 8, you divide that by 2 to get the amplitude of 4

a. To calculate the first and second derivatives of f(x) = ln(x^2 + 1), we can use the chain rule and the derivative of the natural logarithm function.

First derivative:

f'(x) = (1 / (x^2 + 1)) * (2x) = 2x / (x^2 + 1)

Second derivative:

f''(x) = [2 / (x^2 + 1)] - (2x * (2x) / (x^2 + 1)^2) = (2 - 4x^2) / (x^2 + 1)^2

b. To determine the intervals where f(x) is increasing or decreasing, we need to analyze the sign of the first derivative.

For f'(x) = 2x / (x^2 + 1), the denominator (x^2 + 1) is always positive, so we only need to consider the sign of the numerator (2x).

When 2x > 0, which is true when x > 0, the first derivative is positive (f'(x) > 0), indicating that f(x) is increasing.

When 2x < 0, which is true when x < 0, the first derivative is negative (f'(x) < 0), indicating that f(x) is decreasing.

Therefore, f(x) is increasing for x > 0 and decreasing for x < 0.

c. To determine the local maxima and minima for f(x), we need to find the critical points by setting the first derivative equal to zero and solving for x.

2x / (x^2 + 1) = 0

This equation is satisfied when 2x = 0, which gives x = 0.

So, the critical point is x = 0.

To determine if it's a local maximum or minimum, we can analyze the sign of the second derivative at x = 0.

f''(0) = (2 - 4(0)^2) / (0^2 + 1)^2 = 2

Since the second derivative is positive at x = 0 (f''(0) > 0), it indicates a local minimum.

Therefore, the local minimum for f(x) is at x = 0.

d. To determine the intervals where f(x) is concave up or concave down, we need to analyze the sign of the second derivative.

When f''(x) > 0, f(x) is concave up.

When f''(x) < 0, f(x) is concave down.

From part c, we know that the local minimum occurs at x = 0.

For x < 0:

f''(x) = (2 - 4x^2) / (x^2 + 1)^2 < 0, indicating concave down.

For x > 0:

f''(x) = (2 - 4x^2) / (x^2 + 1)^2 > 0, indicating concave up.

Therefore, f(x) is concave down for x < 0 and concave up for x > 0.

e. To find the points of inflection, we need to determine where the concavity changes. It occurs when the second derivative changes sign or when f''(x) = 0.

From part d, we know that f''(x) = (2 - 4x^2) / (x^2 + 1)^2.

Setting f''(x) = 0:

2 - 4x^2 = 0

4

To know more about derivatives refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29144258#

#SPJ11

The experimental probability of needing exactly six rolls to get doubles is given as follows:

p = 0.2 = 20%.

A probability is calculated as the division of the desired number of outcomes by the total number of outcomes in the context of a problem/experiment.

The dot plot shows the number of each rolls, hence the total number of students is given as follows:

2 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 5 + 4 + 1 + 2 = 20 students.

4 of these students needed six rolls, hence the probability is given as follows:

p = 4/20

p = 1/5

p = 0.2 = 20%.

The problem is given by the image presented at the end of the answer.

More can be learned about probability at https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

The possible value of x is any value less than 1100, under the condition that the triangles are not drawn to scale.

The triangle inequality theorem states that the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side. Using this theorem, we can find possible values of x in the triangle with sides 10000, 1000 and 10x.

So we have:

10000 + 1000 > 10x
11000 > 10x
1100 > x

Therefore, x can be any value less than 1100.
The triangle inequality theorem states the relationship regarding the three sides of a triangle. According to this theorem, for any particular triangle, the summation of lengths of two sides is always greater than the third side. In short , this theorem aids to  specify that the shortest distance between two distinct points is always a straight line.

To learn more about triangle inequality theorem
https://brainly.com/question/1163433
#SPJ4

Answer:

There are 4 suits in the pack, being Hearts, Diamonds, Spades and Clubs.

Each suit has 13 cards in it, being Ace, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Jack, Queen and King.

There are 4 Aces in the pack, one for each suit.

P(Ace) = ( 4/52 ) = ( 1/13 ) = 0.0769 = 7.69%

P(Heart) = ( 13/52 ) = ( 1/4 ) = 0.25 = 25.0%

A note of caution. There is a risk that we could double count, that is count an Ace which is also a Heart as 2 cards when it should be one card.

The question asked for the Probability that the drawn card is an Ace or a Heat.

Therefore P( Ace or a Heart ) =

= ( 4/52 )+( 13/52 )-( 1/ 52 ) = ( 16/52 ) or

( 16/52 ) = 0.307692 = 30.77% (rounded,)

PB

a. Probability of selecting the Ace of Spades:
There is only 1 Ace of Spades in a 52-card deck. The probability of selecting the Ace of Spades is the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes (1 Ace of Spades) to the total number of possible outcomes (52 cards in the deck).
Probability = (Number of Favorable Outcomes) / (Total Number of Possible Outcomes)
Probability = 1 / 52

b. Probability of selecting a Jack:
There are 4 Jacks in a 52-card deck (1 in each suit). The probability of selecting a Jack is the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes (4 Jacks) to the total number of possible outcomes (52 cards in the deck).
Probability = (Number of Favorable Outcomes) / (Total Number of Possible Outcomes)
Probability = 4 / 52
Probability = 1 / 13

c. Probability of selecting a Heart:
There are 13 Hearts in a 52-card deck. The probability of selecting a Heart is the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes (13 Hearts) to the total number of possible outcomes (52 cards in the deck).
Probability = (Number of Favorable Outcomes) / (Total Number of Possible Outcomes)
Probability = 13 / 52
Probability = 1 / 4

In summary, the probability of selecting the Ace of Spades is 1/52, the probability of selecting a Jack is 1/13, and the probability of selecting a Heart is 1/4.

To learn more about probability : brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ11

The location of point G on the given number line is 4.

Given that, partitions the directed line segment from F to D into an 8:5 ratio.

A measureable path between two points is referred to as a line segment. Line segments can make up the sides of any polygon because they have a set length.

Since, the line is 13 units and 8:5 is 13 parts each proportion is 1 unit.

Which means 8 parts and 5 parts are on the line.

So, 8+(-4)

= 8-4

= 4

Therefore, the location of point G on the given number line is 4.

Learn more about the line segment here:

https://brainly.com/question/25727583.

#SPJ12

It looks like you want to evaluate the iterated integral of the function 2x(x + 2y) over a given region S. To evaluate the iterated integral, we first integrate with respect to y (dy) and then with respect to x (dx).

Let's first integrate with respect to y:

∫(2x(x + 2y)) dy = 2x(xy + y^2) + C₁

Now, we need to evaluate this expression for the limits of integration for y, which are not given in your question. I'll assume they are y = a and y = b, so we have:

[2x(xb + b^2) - 2x(xa + a^2)]

Next, we'll integrate this expression with respect to x:

∫(2x(xb + b^2) - 2x(xa + a^2)) dx = x^2(xb + b^2) - x^2(xa + a^2) + C₂

Finally, we need to evaluate this expression for the limits of integration for x, which are also not given in your question. Assuming they are x = c and x = d, we have:

[(d^2(dc + b^2) - d^2(da + a^2)) - (c^2(cc + b^2) - c^2(ca + a^2))]

This expression represents the value of the iterated integral for the function 2x(x + 2y) over the region S, given the limits of integration for x and y. Please provide the limits of integration for a more specific answer.

To learn more about integration visit;

brainly.com/question/30900582

#SPJ11

All outcomes are equally likely and focuses on the mathematical principles rather than relying on observed data or personal judgment and experience.

The classical definition of probability is a fundamental concept in probability theory that defines the likelihood of an event occurring.

This definition is based on theoretical arguments, and it states that the probability of an event occurring is the ratio of the number of ways the event can occur to the total number of possible outcomes.
The classical definition of probability assumes that the process that generates the outcomes is known and that all outcomes are equally likely.

It also assumes that the events are mutually exclusive, meaning that only one event can occur at a time.
In essence,

The classical definition of probability is based on observed data and theoretical arguments.

This definition is often used in situations where the outcomes are equally likely, and there is no prior knowledge about the likelihood of each outcome.
One of the key features of the classical definition of probability is that it can only be used in situations where the events are mutually exclusive and the outcomes are equally likely.

This means that this definition is not suitable for situations where the outcomes are not equally likely, and there is no prior knowledge about the likelihood of each outcome.
In summary,

The classical definition of probability is based on theoretical arguments and observed data.

It can only be used in situations where the events are mutually exclusive and the outcomes are equally likely.

It is an essential concept in probability theory and has many applications in various fields, including statistics, finance, and science.

For more questions related to mathematical principles:

https://brainly.com/question/3994259

#SPJ11

We have a total of 1 + 4 + 6 + 4 + 1 = 16 possible ways to distribute the particles among the available states. Since each of these ways corresponds to a unique state, the degeneracy of the system is 16.

In statistical mechanics, the degeneracy of a state is the number of different ways that state can be realized.

For a system of n distinguishable particles with two available states each, there are 2^n possible states. For n = 4, this gives us 2^4 = 16 possible states. However, we need to take into account the fact that multiple states can have the same energy.

To list all the possible states for n = 4, we can use binary notation where "0" represents the first available state and "1" represents the second available state. We can list all the possible binary strings of length 4:

0000

0001

0010

0011

0100

0101

0110

0111

1000

1001

1010

1011

1100

1101

1110

1111

Now we need to identify which of these states have the same energy. For a system of n distinguishable particles with two available states each, there are (n+r-1) choose r ways to distribute r particles among the available states.

Here, r represents the number of particles in the second available state. For our system with n=4 particles, we can distribute 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 particles among the available states.

For 0 particles in the second state: there is only 1 way to do this (all particles in the first state). This corresponds to the state 0000.

For 1 particle in the second state: there are 4 ways to do this (1 particle in the second state, 3 particles in the first state; 2 particles in the second state, 2 particles in the first state; 3 particles in the second state, 1 particle in the first state). This corresponds to the states 0001, 0010, 0100, and 1000.

For 2 particles in the second state: there are 6 ways to do this (2 particles in the second state, 2 particles in the first state; 1 particle in the second state, 3 particles in the first state; 3 particles in the second state, 1 particle in the first state; 4 particles in the second state, 0 particles in the first state). This corresponds to the states 0011, 0101, 0110, 1001, 1010, and 1100.

For 3 particles in the second state: there are 4 ways to do this (1 particle in the first state, 3 particles in the second state; 2 particles in the first state, 2 particles in the second state; 3 particles in the first state, 1 particle in the second state; 4 particles in the first state, 0 particles in the second state). This corresponds to the states 0111, 1011, 1101, and 1110.

For 4 particles in the second state: there is only 1 way to do this (all particles in the second state). This corresponds to the state 1111.

Therefore, we have a total of 1 + 4 + 6 + 4 + 1 = 16 possible ways to distribute the particles among the available states. Since each of these ways corresponds to a unique state, the degeneracy of the system is 16.

To learn more about degeneracy, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/15873781

#SPJ11

The area of the concave hexagon AOBCPD is 36 square units.

The concave hexagon AOBCPD is formed by two externally tangent circles with centers O and P and radii 2 and 4, respectively. Points A and B are on the circle with center O, and points C and D are on the circle with center P. Lines AD and BC are common external tangents to the circles.

To find the area of the hexagon, we can divide it into two trapezoids: AOCP and BOCD. In each trapezoid, the shorter base is a radius of the smaller circle (2 units) and the longer base is a radius of the larger circle (4 units). Since AD and BC are tangent to the circles, they are perpendicular to the radii at the points of tangency, forming right angles. This means the height of each trapezoid is the same, and it is the distance between the centers O and P (6 units).

Let's use the formula for the area of a trapezoid: (1/2)(sum of parallel sides)(height). For trapezoid AOCP: (1/2)(2+4)(6) = 18 square units. For trapezoid BOCD: (1/2)(2+4)(6) = 18 square units. The total area of hexagon AOBCPD is the sum of the areas of the two trapezoids: 18 + 18 = 36 square units. Therefore, the area of the concave hexagon AOBCPD is 36 square units.

To learn more about external tangents : brainly.com/question/13005496

#SPJ11

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

The point(s) at which f has a local maximum is x = -4.

To find the point(s) at which f has a local maximum, we need to find the critical points of f. This means we need to find the values of x where f'(x) = 0 or f'(x) does not exist.

First, let's set f'(x) = 0 and solve for x:

(3x² + 3x – 36) (1+ g(x)) = 0

We can see that the first factor will be 0 when:

3x² + 3x – 36 = 0

This quadratic equation can be factored as:

(3x – 9)(x + 4) = 0

So we have two solutions: x = 3/ and x = -4.

Now we need to check if f'(x) exists at these points. We know that f'(x) is a product of two factors, and since the first factor is zero at x = 3/ and x = -4, we need to check if the second factor (1+ g(x)) is also zero at those points. If it is, then f'(x) does not exist at those points.

Unfortunately, we don't have any information about g(x), so we can't determine if it is zero at x = 3/ and x = -4. However, we can still use the first derivative test to determine if f has a local maximum at those points.

The first derivative test says that if f'(x) changes sign from positive to negative at x = a, then f has a local maximum at x = a. Similarly, if f'(x) changes sign from negative to positive at x = a, then f has a local minimum at x = a.

Let's evaluate f'(x) for some values of x near x = 3/:

f'(2) = (3(2)² + 3(2) – 36) (1+ g(2)) = -9(1+ g(2))
f'(3) = (3(3)² + 3(3) – 36) (1+ g(3)) = 0
f'(4) = (3(4)² + 3(4) – 36) (1+ g(4)) = 9(1+ g(4))

Since f'(x) changes sign from negative to positive as x increases through x = 3/, we know that f has a local minimum at x = 3/. Similarly, since f'(x) changes sign from positive to negative as x decreases through x = -4, we know that f has a local maximum at x = -4.

Therefore, the point(s) at which f has a local maximum is x = -4.

To learn more about Local Maximum

https://brainly.com/question/11894628

#SPJ11

The partial derivatives of f with respect to r, s, and t are: ∂f/∂r = y + 0.06tx + 0.02t, ∂f/∂s = y + 0.02s and ∂f/∂t = y + 0.06rx - 0.14x + 0.02r.

To compute the partial derivatives of f(x,y,z) with respect to r, s, and t, we will use the chain rule.

∂f/∂r = ∂f/∂x * ∂x/∂r + ∂f/∂y * ∂y/∂r + ∂f/∂z * ∂z/∂r

∂f/∂s = ∂f/∂x * ∂x/∂s + ∂f/∂y * ∂y/∂s + ∂f/∂z * ∂z/∂s

∂f/∂t = ∂f/∂x * ∂x/∂t + ∂f/∂y * ∂y/∂t + ∂f/∂z * ∂z/∂t

First, we calculate the partial derivatives of the component functions with respect to r, s, and t:

∂x/∂r = 1, ∂x/∂s = 1, ∂x/∂t = -7

∂y/∂r = 3t, ∂y/∂s = 0, ∂y/∂t = 3r

∂z/∂r = t, ∂z/∂s = s, ∂z/∂t = 0

Then, we compute the partial derivatives of f with respect to x, y, and z:

∂f/∂x = y, ∂f/∂y = x, ∂f/∂z = 2%

Finally, we substitute all the partial derivatives into the chain rule formula to obtain:

∂f/∂r = y + 3tx(2%) + 2%(t)

∂f/∂s = y + 2%(s)

∂f/∂t = y + 3rx(2%) - 7x(2%) + 2%(r)

Therefore, the partial derivatives of f with respect to r, s, and t are:

∂f/∂r = y + 0.06tx + 0.02t

∂f/∂s = y + 0.02s

∂f/∂t = y + 0.06rx - 0.14x + 0.02r

where 2% is written as 0.02 for simplicity.

To know more about partial derivatives refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/31397807

#SPJ11

The best point estimate for the average number of classes per semester for all students at the local college is 4, based on the study that found students completed an average of 4 classes per semester and the sample of 132 students that was taken.

Based on the information provided, the best point estimate for the average number of classes per semester for all students at the local college can be calculated as follows:
1. Identify the sample average: In this case, it is given that students completed an average of 4 classes per semester.
2. Determine the sample size: Here, the sample size is 132 students.
Since the point estimate is essentially the sample average, the best point estimate for the average number of classes per semester for all students at the local college is 4.

Learn more about average here: brainly.com/question/31080273

#SPJ11

The formula for the derivative y=g′(x) is y = 5.

To find the derivative y=g′(x) of the function y=g(x)=−x^2 + 5x + 7 using the limit definition, follow these steps:

1. Recall the limit definition of a derivative:

g′(x) = lim(h -> 0) [(g(x+h) - g(x)) / h]
2. Substitute the function g(x) into the definition:

g′(x) = lim(h -> 0) [(-x^2 + 5x + 7 - (-x^2 + 5(x+h) + 7)) / h]
3. Simplify the expression inside the limit:

g′(x) = lim(h -> 0) [(5h) / h]
4. Cancel out the common factor (h):

g′(x) = lim(h -> 0) [5]
5. As h approaches 0, the expression remains constant at 5.

So, the formula for the derivative y=g′(x) is y = 5.

Learn more about "derivative":

https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ11

The probability that the candy is red or green is given as follows:

P = 0.29.

A probability is calculated as the division of the desired number of outcomes by the total number of outcomes in the context of a problem/experiment.

For this problem, we are given the distribution, hence we must only obtain the desired probabilities, as follows:

Hence the probability that the candy is red or green is given as follows:

p = 0.13 + 0.16 = 0.29.

More can be learned about probability at https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

Using the Limit Comparison Test with a_n = sin 1/n and b_n = 1/n, we can simplify lim_n→∞ a_n/b_n to lim_m→0 sin m/m. This limit is equal to 1, which is a finite value. Therefore, the series sigma_n=1^infinity 6 sin 1/n is convergent.

Step 1:Substituting m = 1/n, the limit becomes lim_m→0 (sin m)/m. From previous work with limits, we know that lim_m→0 (sin m)/m = 1.

Step 2 :Since the limit is finite and positive (specifically, 1), the given series behaves similarly to the harmonic series

Step 3 :Sigma_n=1^infinity 6/n, which is known to be divergent. Therefore, the original series, sigma_n=1^infinity 6 sin(1/n), is also divergent.

To learn more about divergent : brainly.com/question/31383099

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is true. If a finite number of terms are added to a convergent series, then the new series is still convergent.

A convergent series is a series whose sum approaches a finite limit as the number of terms increases. When you add a finite number of terms to a convergent series, the sum of the series is simply increased by the sum of those additional terms. Since the original series converges to a finite limit, adding a finite sum to that limit will result in another finite limit, meaning that the new series will also be convergent.

In summary, adding a finite number of terms to a convergent series does not change its convergence properties and will result in a new convergent series with an updated finite limit.

To learn more about convergent series click here

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The exact area of the surface obtained by rotating the curve about the x-axis is 32π/3 square units.

The curve is 4x = y^2 + 16.

To find the surface area obtained by rotating the curve about the x-axis, we can use the formula:

Surface area = 2π ∫a^b y √(1 + (dy/dx)^2) dx

where a and b are the limits of integration and dy/dx is the derivative of y with respect to x.

4x = y^2 + 16

y^2 = 4x - 16

y = ± √(4x - 16)

dy/dx = 1/2 √(4x - 16)' = 1/4 √(4x - 16)'

Surface area = 2π ∫4^12 √(4x - 16) √(1 + (1/4 √(4x - 16)')^2) dx

= 2π ∫4^12 √(4x - 16) √(1 + (x - 4)/x) dx

= 2π ∫4^12 √(4x - 16) √(x/(x - 4)) dx

= 2π ∫4^12 2√(x(x - 4)) dx

= 4π ∫0^2 u^2/2 du (where u = √(x(x - 4)))

= 4π (u^3/3)|0^2

= 32π/3

Therefore, the exact area of the surface obtained by rotating the curve about the x-axis is 32π/3 square units.

To learn more about “surface area” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/16519513

#SPJ11

The tip of the shadow is moving at approximately 8.96 ft/sec

To find how fast the tip of the shadow is moving when the 6-foot-tall woman is 30 feet away from the 14-foot-tall pole, we can use similar triangles and the concept of related rates.

Let x be the distance from the woman to the tip of her shadow, and y be the distance from the base of the pole to the tip of the shadow. Since the height of the pole and the height of the woman create similar triangles, we have:

(Height of woman) / (Distance from woman to tip of shadow) = (Height of pole) / (Distance from base of pole to tip of shadow)
6 / x = 14 / y

Now, we need to find the rate at which the tip of the shadow is moving (dy/dt) when the woman is 30 feet away from the pole (y = 30). Differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to time (t):

6(-dx/dt) / x^2 = 14(dy/dt) / y^2

Since the woman is walking away from the pole at 7 ft/sec:

dx/dt = 7

When the woman is 30 feet away from the pole:

y = 30

We can find x using the similar triangles:

6 / x = 14 / 30
x = (6 * 30) / 14
x = 90 / 14

Now, plug in the values of x, y, and dx/dt into the equation and solve for dy/dt:

6(-7) / (90 / 14)^2 = 14(dy/dt) / 30^2

After solving the equation:

dy/dt ≈ 8.96

So, the tip of the shadow is moving at approximately 8.96 ft/sec when the woman is 30 feet away from the base of the pole.

To learn more about Differentiation

https://brainly.com/question/16050770

#SPJ11

This triple integral can be solved using integration techniques.

To evaluate the given triple integral using cylindrical coordinates, we first need to express the given function in terms of cylindrical coordinates.

In cylindrical coordinates, we have x = r cos(theta), y = r sin(theta), and z = z. So, we can rewrite the given function as f(r,theta,z) = e^(r^2 sin^2(theta) cos^2(theta) z^2).

Now, we need to find the limits of integration for r, theta, and z. Since the solid e is bounded by the circular paraboloid z = 1 - 16(r^2 cos^2(theta) + r^2 sin^2(theta)), we can write this as z = 1 - 16r^2 in cylindrical coordinates.

Thus, the limits of integration for z are from 0 to 1 - 16r^2. The limits of integration for r are from 0 to 1/sqrt(16cos^2(theta) + 16sin^2(theta)) = 1/4. The limits of integration for theta are from 0 to 2pi.

Therefore, the triple integral can be written as:

∭e^(r^2 sin^2(theta) cos^2(theta) z^2) r dz dr dtheta

= ∫(from 0 to 2pi) ∫(from 0 to 1/4) ∫(from 0 to 1-16r^2) e^(r^2 sin^2(theta) cos^2(theta) z^2) r dz dr dtheta

In summary, we used cylindrical coordinates to express the given function and found the limits of integration for r, theta, and z. We then evaluated the triple integral using these limits.

For more about integral:

https://brainly.com/question/31433890

#SPJ11

Answer:

14x+32

Step-by-step explanation:

first, collect like terms

that is 4x+10x+45-13

14x+32

If the car had not hit the fence, it would have skidded an extra distance of approximately 275.51 meters.

We have,

The skid distance formula is as follows:

Skid Distance = (v²) / (2 * μ * g)

Where:

v is the initial velocity of the car before braking

μ is the coefficient of friction between the tires and the road surface

g is the acceleration due to gravity

The initial velocity of the car is 30 m/s and the coefficient of friction is 0.8.

Substituting these values into the skid distance formula,

Skid Distance = (30²) / (2 * 0.8 * 9.8) = 275.51 meters

(rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore,

If the car had not hit the fence, it would have skidded an extra distance of approximately 275.51 meters.

Learn mroe about skid distance here:

https://brainly.com/question/29082778

#SPJ12

The complete question:

If the car had not hit the fence, how much farther would it have skidded? Solve the skid distance formula to find the extra distance that the car would have traveled if it had not hit the fence.

The initial velocity of the car is 30 m/s and the coefficient of friction is 0.8.

Round your answer to two decimal places.

Note that unit conversion is built into the skid distance formula, so no unit conversions are needed.