Which function forms an arithmetic sequence?


a. F(x) = 8(2)^2


b. F(x) = 3x^3 + 1


c. F(x) = 5/x -2


d. F(x) = 2x - 4

As per the given values, the height of the vase is approximately 7.3 cm.

The radius of the vase = 4.3cm

The volume of vase = 1330. 2 cm³

Two parallel circular bases are connected by a curving surface to form the three-dimensional object known as a cylinder. There are two round flat sides, two curved edges, and one curved surface.

Using the formula for the volume of a cylinder -

V = πr²h,

where r is the radius and h is the height.

Substituting the values -

1330.2 = π(4.3)²h

1330.2 = 58.09πh

Dividing both sides by 58.09π

1330.2/58.09π = 58.09πh/58.09π

h = 7.27

= 7.3 ( After rounding)

Read more about height on:

https://brainly.com/question/28122539

#SPJ4

a. The cost for a 100-mile radius for 3 weeks is $585, and there are 98 resumes within this radius, so the average cost per resume would be:

$585 / 98 = $5.96 per resume

b. The cost for a 150-mile radius for 3 weeks is $675, and there are 208 resumes within this radius, so the average cost per resume would be:

$675 / 208 = $3.25 per resume

c. If an employer opts for the 150-mile radius option instead of the 100-mile radius option, they would pay an extra $90 ($675 - $585) to see an additional 110 resumes (208 - 98).

The average cost to the employer for looking at each extra resume would be:

$90 / 110 = $0.82 per resume

d. An advantage of opting for the more expensive plan is that the employer would have access to a larger pool of potential candidates, which could increase the likelihood of finding a qualified applicant.

A disadvantage is that the employer would have to pay more money, which could be a significant expense for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.

To know more about resumes refer here

https://brainly.com/question/862477#

#SPJ11

To build a ramp with a 15-inch rise for rolling gym equipment into your school, following ADA specifications, we should create a ramp with a run of 180 inches to maintain a 1:12 slope.

For building a ramp with a rise of 15 inches for rolling gym equipment into your school, following ADA specifications. Let's use these terms in our step-by-step explanation:

1. ADA specifications: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) specifies that the slope of a ramp should be no more than 1:12, which means that for every 1 inch of rise, there should be 12 inches of run.

2. Ramp rise: In this case, the rise is 15 inches.

3. Calculate ramp run: To find the ramp run, we can use the ADA specification of 1:12. Multiply the rise (15 inches) by 12.

15 inches x 12 = 180 inches

4. Ramp run: Based on the calculation, the run for the ramp should be 180 inches.

5. Ramp length: To ensure a safe and accessible ramp, follow the ADA specifications and use a ramp length of 180 inches to achieve the 15-inch rise.

To know more about ADA specifications refer to

https://brainly.com/question/30286625

#SPJ11

The maximum height of the fireworks using the equation h=-4.6t^2+27.6t+33.6 is 75 meters.

Identifying the coefficients a, b, and c from the given quadratic equation.
a = -4.6, b = 27.6, and c = 33.6

Calculating the t-value of the vertex using the formula t = -b / (2 × a)
t = -27.6 / (2 × (-4.6)) = 27.6 / 9.2 = 3

Now, plugging in the t-value back into the equation to find the maximum height.
h = -4.6(3)^2 + 27.6(3) + 33.6

  = -4.6(9) + 82.8 + 33.6

  = -41.4 + 82.8 + 33.6

  = 75

The maximum height of the fireworks is 75 meters.

To learn more about height: https://brainly.com/question/12446886

#SPJ11

The volume of the solid is given by V = 9r/2 - 3.

To calculate the volume of this solid, we will use a triple integral, which involves integrating a function of three variables over a three-dimensional region. The triple integral is denoted by ∭f(x, y, z) dV, where f(x, y, z) is the function we are integrating, and dV is the volume element.

In our problem, the function f(x, y, z) is equal to 1, which means we are integrating a constant function. Therefore, we can simplify the triple integral to V = ∭dV, where V represents the volume of the solid.

To evaluate the triple integral, we need to determine the limits of integration for each variable. We are given the limits for x, y, and z, so we can set up the triple integral as follows:

V =  ∫₂⁰ ∫₃⁰ r2-2y 1 dz dy dx

We integrate first with respect to z, then y, and finally x.

Integrating with respect to z, we get:

V = ∫₂⁰ ∫₃⁰[r2-2y - 1] dy dx

Simplifying the integral, we get:

V =  ∫₂⁰ [r2y - y2]dy dx

Integrating with respect to y, we get:

V = ∫₂⁰ [(r2/2)y2 - (1/3)y3]dy

Simplifying the integral, we get:

V = [(r/2)(3)2 - (1/3)(3)3] - [(r2/2)(0)2 - (1/3)(0)3]

V = 9r/2 - 3

To know more about volume here

https://brainly.com/question/11168779

#SPJ4

To find the projection of b onto the subspace W spanned by vi and v2, we need to first find the orthogonal projection of b onto W.

We can use the formula for orthogonal projection:

projW b = ((b ⋅ vi)/(vi ⋅ vi))vi + ((b ⋅ v2)/(v2 ⋅ v2))v2

where ⋅ denotes the dot product.

Plugging in the given values:

projW b = ((1*3 + 2*1 - 1*0 - 5*(-1))/(3*3 + 1*1 + 0*0 + (-1)*(-1)))vi + ((1*0 + 2*1 - 1*3 - 5*1)/(0*0 + 1*1 + 3*3 + 1*1))v2

Simplifying:

projW b = (22/11)vi + (-6/11)v2

Therefore, the projection of b onto the subspace W is given by (22/11, -6/11, 0, 0).
To find the projection of vector b onto the subspace W spanned by vectors v1 and v2, we will use the following formula:

proj_W(b) = (b · v1 / v1 · v1) * v1 + (b · v2 / v2 · v2) * v2

First, calculate the dot products:

b · v1 = (1 * 3) + (2 * 1) + (-1 * 0) + (-5 * -1) = 3 + 2 + 0 + 5 = 10
b · v2 = (1 * 0) + (2 * 1) + (-1 * 3) + (-5 * 1) = 0 + 2 - 3 - 5 = -6
v1 · v1 = (3 * 3) + (1 * 1) + (0 * 0) + (-1 * -1) = 9 + 1 + 0 + 1 = 11
v2 · v2 = (0 * 0) + (1 * 1) + (3 * 3) + (1 * 1) = 0 + 1 + 9 + 1 = 11

Now plug the dot products into the formula:

proj_W(b) = (10 / 11) * v1 + (-6 / 11) * v2
proj_W(b) = (10/11) * (3, 1, 0, -1) + (-6/11) * (0, 1, 3, 1)

Perform scalar multiplication:

proj_W(b) = (30/11, 10/11, 0, -10/11) + (0, -6/11, -18/11, -6/11)

Finally, add the two vectors:

proj_W(b) = (30/11, 4/11, -18/11, -16/11)

So the projection of b onto subspace W is:

proj_W(b) = (30/11, 4/11, -18/11, -16/11)

Learn more about orthogonal projection here: brainly.com/question/30834408

#SPJ11

Weak correlation observed in scatter plot, inaccurate r=0.01 value; possible causal relationship - new fertilizer's effect on strawberry yields.

Based on the scatter plot, a correlation coefficient of r=0.01 is not an accurate value for this data. This is because the scatter plot shows an upward trend with moderately spread out points from the line of best fit, indicating a weak positive correlation. A correlation coefficient of 0.01 suggests a near-zero correlation, which is inconsistent with the observed pattern in the scatter plot.

A possible scenario for a causal relationship for strawberries picked on the farm could be the application of a new fertilizer that is known to increase strawberry yields. The farmer could divide the field in half, applying the new fertilizer to one half and the traditional fertilizer to the other half, and then compare the yields of each half. This would allow for a comparison of the effect of the two different fertilizers on strawberry yields and establish a causal relationship between the fertilizer and the yield of strawberries.

Learn more about scatter plot

brainly.com/question/29231735

#SPJ11

the actual perimeter of the living room  in the scale drawing  is 216 inches.

We can precisely portray locations, areas, structures, and details in scale drawings at a scale that is either smaller or more feasible than the original.

When a drawing is said to be "to scale," it signifies that each piece is proportionate to the real or hypothetical entity; it may be smaller or larger by a specific amount.

When something is described as being "drawn to scale," we assume that it has been printed or drawn to a conventional scale that is accepted as the norm in the construction sector.

When our awareness of scale improves, we are better able to quickly recognize the spaces, zones, and proposed or existent spatial relationships when looking at a drawing at a given scale.

One metre is equivalent to one metre in the actual world. When an object is depicted at a 1:10 scale, it is 10 times smaller than it would be in real life.

You might also remark that 10 units in real life are equivalent to 1 unit in the illustration.

If the length and breadth of the living room in real life are 9/4 inches each, we can use the given scale of the drawing to find the corresponding dimensions of the living room in the drawing:

1/4 inch = 2 feet

So, 9/4 inches in real life is equal to:

(9/4) inches / (1/4 inch per 2 feet) = 18 feet

This means that each side of the living room in the drawing would be 18/2 = 9 inches long.

To find the actual perimeter of the living room, we need to convert the dimensions back to real-life measurements and add up the lengths of all four sides:

Length in real life = 9/4 inches x 2 x 12 inches/foot = 54 inches

Breadth in real life = 9/4 inches x 2 x 12 inches/foot = 54 inches

Perimeter in real life = 2 x (Length + Breadth)

Perimeter in real life = 2 x (54 inches + 54 inches)

Perimeter in real life = 2 x 108 inches

Perimeter in real life = 216 inches

Therefore, the actual perimeter of the living room is 216 inches.

To know more about scale drawing visit :-

brainly.com/question/17388747

#SPJ1

Answer:

0.16 gallons of paint

the number lies between 0 and 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Chairs and tables used the same amount of paint,

20x + 5x = 4

25x = 4

x = 0.16

So, each piece of furniture will use 0.16 gallons of paint.

Answer: The correlation coefficient (r) and determination coefficient (r²) are both measures of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables in a dataset.

The correlation coefficient (r) is a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, with -1 indicating a perfect negative correlation, 0 indicating no correlation, and 1 indicating a perfect positive correlation. The correlation coefficient only tells us the strength and direction of the relationship; it does not tell us anything about the proportion of variation in one variable that is explained by the variation in the other variable.

The determination coefficient (r²), also known as the coefficient of determination, is a measure of the proportion of variation in one variable that is explained by the variation in the other variable. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating that none of the variation in one variable is explained by the variation in the other variable, and 1 indicating that all of the variation in one variable is explained by the variation in the other variable. The determination coefficient is calculated as the square of the correlation coefficient, so r² always has the same sign as r. A value of r² close to 1 indicates that the relationship between the variables is strong and that a large proportion of the variation in one variable can be explained by the variation in the other variable.

In summary, the correlation coefficient tells us about the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables, while the determination coefficient tells us about the proportion of variation in one variable that is explained by the variation in the other variable.

While correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables, determination coefficient measures how much of the variability in one variable can be explained by the other variable.

The correlation coefficient and determination coefficient are two related statistical measures that help us understand the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables. The correlation coefficient (denoted as r) measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, with -1 indicating a strong negative relationship, 1 indicating a strong positive relationship, and 0 suggesting no relationship.

On the other hand, the determination coefficient (represented as R²) quantifies the proportion of variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating no explanatory power and 1 indicating perfect prediction. R² is simply the square of the correlation coefficient (r²).

In summary, while the correlation coefficient shows the strength and direction of a linear relationship, the determination coefficient indicates the extent to which one variable can predict the other. Both are important in determining the nature of relationships between variables in a data set.

Learn more about determination coefficient here: https://brainly.com/question/17237825

#SPJ11

The average monthly exchange rate between the us dollar and the Australian dollar for 2018

A. The components of a time series of average monthly exchange rates include trend, seasonality, cyclical fluctuations, and random noise. The trend represents the long-term movement of the exchange rate, seasonality represents repeating patterns within a fixed period, cyclical fluctuations are changes due to economic cycles, and random noise consists of unpredictable fluctuations.

B. To smooth out the patterns that include everything the model learned, you can apply an exponential smoothing method with a chosen smoothing coefficient (alpha). A suitable coefficient could be 0.2, representing a balance between giving weight to recent data and considering the historical pattern. The decision on the coefficient depends on the specific characteristics of the data and the desired degree of smoothing.

C. To forecast the monthly exchange rate for 2020, you can apply various techniques, such as moving average, exponential smoothing, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and machine learning-based methods. Each method has its advantages and limitations, and it's important to analyze the performance of each technique on historical data to choose the most appropriate method for forecasting.

D. Comparing the forecasting results of different techniques applied in part (C) requires measuring their accuracy using metrics like mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The technique with the lowest error values would be considered more accurate in predicting the monthly exchange rates. It is crucial to consider the data characteristics and the goals of the forecast when deciding on the most suitable technique.

To know more about monthly exchange refer here

https://brainly.com/question/14288610#

#SPJ11

The amount of interest Amy will pay over the 3 years is $105.

Simple interest is a method of calculating the interest amount on a loan or investment by multiplying the principal amount, the annual interest rate, and the time in years. In Amy's case, she borrowed $1,000 with an annual interest rate of 3.5% and will take 3 years to pay back the loan.

To calculate the interest Amy will pay, use the formula: Interest = Principal x Rate x Time

Interest = $1,000 x 0.035 (3.5% as a decimal) x 3 years

Interest = $1,000 x 0.035 x 3 = $105

Amy will pay $105 in interest over the 3 years.

Learn more about Simple interest here: https://brainly.com/question/25845758

#SPJ11

Points of inflection: (11/6, -10.37).

To determine the intervals of concavity and find the points of inflection, we first need to find the second derivative of the function f(x) = 2x^3 - 11x^2 + 7.

1. First derivative:
f'(x) = 6x^2 - 22x

2. Second derivative:
f''(x) = 12x - 22

Now, we need to find the critical points by setting the second derivative equal to zero:

12x - 22 = 0
x = 11/6

The point of inflection occurs at x = 11/6. Now, let's find the intervals of concavity:

1. f''(x) > 0 (concave up):
12x - 22 > 0
x > 11/6

2. f''(x) < 0 (concave down):
12x - 22 < 0
x < 11/6

Finally, we need to find the y-coordinate for the point of inflection:

f(11/6) = 2(11/6)^3 - 11(11/6)^2 + 7 ≈ -10.37

So, the point of inflection is (11/6, -10.37).

Points of inflection: (11/6, -10.37).
Your answer: The function is concave up on the interval (11/6, ∞) and concave down on the interval (-∞, 11/6). The point of inflection is (11/6, -10.37).

To learn more about inflection, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/11986000

#SPJ11

The ladder makes an angle of approximately 82 degrees with the ground when it is extended to a length of 18 feet and the bottom of the ladder is 4.5 feet from the base of the building.

To determine the angle that the ladder makes with the ground, we can use trigonometry. Let x be the height of the ladder when it is leaned against the building. Then, using the Pythagorean theorem, we have: [tex]x^{2}[/tex] + [tex]4.5^{2}[/tex] = [tex]18^{2}[/tex]

Solving for x, we get: x = sqrt([tex]18^{2}[/tex] - [tex]4.5^{2}[/tex]), x ≈ 17.29

Therefore, the ladder makes an angle θ with the ground such that: sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = x/18, θ = arcsin(x/18)

Substituting x ≈ 17.29, we get: θ ≈ 81.99 degrees

Therefore, the ladder makes an angle of approximately 82 degrees with the ground when it is extended to a length of 18 feet and the bottom of the ladder is 4.5 feet from the base of the building.

To know more about Pythagorean theorem, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14930619#

#SPJ11

The product of 2-4i and 3 is represented on the complex plane as a vector with magnitude 6√5 and angle -63.43 degrees, starting from the origin.

To represent the product of a complex number and a real number on the complex plane:

We multiply the real part and the imaginary part of the complex number by the real number.

The magnitude (or length) of the resulting complex number is multiplied by the absolute value of the real number.

The angle (or argument) of the resulting complex number is the same as the angle of the original complex number.

For the product of 2−4i and 3:

We multiply the real part (2) and the imaginary part (-4i) of the complex number by the real number (3), to get:

3(2) + 3(-4i) = 6 - 12i

The magnitude of the resulting complex number is:

|6 - 12i| = √(6² + (-12)²) = √180 = 6√5

The angle of the resulting complex number is the same as the angle of the original complex number (2-4i), which can be found using the inverse tangent function:

tanθ = (imaginary part) / (real part) = (-4) / 2 = -2

θ = atan(-2) ≈ -1.107 radians or ≈ -63.43 degrees

Therefore, the product of 2-4i and 3 is represented on the complex plane as a vector with magnitude 6√5 and angle -63.43 degrees, starting from the origin.

To know more about complex number refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20566728

#SPJ11

The given question is related to a regression line, where the equation is given as y = 1425 + 19.87x.

Slope of the equation is 19.87 and the intercept of the equation is 1425.

In part (a), step 2, we can explain that the slope in the least square regression equation is the coefficient of x and represents the average increase or decrease in y per unit of x.

Therefore, the slope value here is b = 19.87, which means that the average consumption of natural gas per day by Joan will decrease by 19.87 cubic feet per degree Fahrenheit over a month.

In part (b), step 1, we can explain that the y-intercept is a constant value in the least square regression equation that represents the average value of y when x is 0. Here, the intercept value is m = 1425, which means that when the temperature is 0 degrees Fahrenheit, the average consumption of natural gas per day is 1425 cubic feet.

This value has significance in this scenario because it indicates that a temperature of 0 degrees Fahrenheit is a possible temperature for which the natural gas consumption has been calculated.

To know more about regression here

https://brainly.com/question/14184702

#SPJ4

The distance Gary traveled to visit his brother is 2.1 x 10^2 times as much as the distance he traveled to visit his sister.

To determine how many times the distance to visit Gary's brother is compared to the distance to visit his sister, we'll follow these steps:

1. Identify the distances traveled:
  - Sister: 2 x 10^3 miles
  - Brother: 4.2 x 10^5 miles

2. Divide the distance to the brother by the distance to the sister:
  (4.2 x 10^5 miles) / (2 x 10^3 miles)

3. Simplify the expression:
  - First, let's divide the coefficients: 4.2 ÷ 2 = 2.1
  - Next, divide the exponents: 10^5 ÷ 10^3 = 10^(5-3) = 10^2

4. Combine the results:
  2.1 x 10^2

So, the distance Gary traveled to visit his brother is 2.1 x 10^2 times as much as the distance he traveled to visit his sister.

Learn more about distance,

https://brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ11

The solution to the  Linear equation is x = 1.5.

The math equation for the given problem is 15 - x = 7x + 3.

To solve this equation, first simplify it by combining like terms on one side of the equation.

15 - x - 7x = 3

Next, combine like terms on the left side of the equation.

15 - 8x = 3

Now, isolate the variable by subtracting 15 from both sides of the equation.

-8x = -12

Finally, solve for x by dividing both sides by -8.

x = 1.5

Therefore, the solution to the equation is x = 1.5.

To summarize, the linear equation 15 - x = 7x + 3, we simplify it by combining like terms. Subtracting x and 7x from both sides gives us 15 - 8x = 3. Next, we isolate the variable by subtracting 15 from both sides, resulting in -8x = -12.

Finally, we solve for x by dividing both sides by -8, giving us x = 1.5. This means that when we substitute x with 1.5 in the original equation, both sides will be equal. The solution x = 1.5 satisfies the equation and represents the value at which the equation is true.

To learn more about Linear equation go to :

https://brainly.com/question/11897796#

#SPJ11

Interpretation:

The regression coefficient b = 16.6 represents the change in the predicted ozone level (in parts per million) for each additional million people in the population.

Specifically, for each additional million people, the predicted ozone level is expected to increase by 16.6 parts per million.

For Rascoville, a city with a population of 3 million people, we can use the estimated regression equation to predict the average ozone level:

ozone⌢ = 8.89 + 16.6 × 3 = 8.89 + 49.8 = 58.69

Therefore, the predicted average ozone level for Rascoville is 58.69 parts per million.

If the ozone level is approximately 142 ppm, we can use the estimated regression equation to estimate the population:

142 = 8.89 + 16.6 × population

Solving for population, we get:

133.11 = 16.6 × population

population ≈ 8.02 million

Therefore, the approximate population of the city is 8 million people (rounded to the nearest million).

To know more about ozone level refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29672449#

#SPJ11

Answer: [tex](w^{\frac{1}{5} } )^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The root of a number, say [tex]\sqrt[n]{x}[/tex] is equal to [tex]x^{\frac{1}{n} }[/tex]. So, [tex]\sqrt[5]{w^{3} } = (w^{3} )^{\frac{1}{5} }[/tex]. Since when dealing with an exponent of a number raised to an exponent you multiply the exponents, due to the associative property it does not matter which order you do the exponents in. So, [tex](w^{3} )^{\frac{1}{5} }= (w^{\frac{1}{5} } )^{3}[/tex], which is answer D.

To calculate the percent error, we need to use the following formula:

percent error = (|measured value - actual value| / actual value) x 100%

1. Determine the difference between the actual value (8 laps) and the estimated value (5 laps).
Actual value = 8 laps
Estimated value = 5 laps
Difference = Actual value - Estimated value = 8 - 5 = 3 laps

2. Divide the difference by the actual value:
Percent error (decimal) = Difference / Actual value = 3 laps / 8 laps = 0.375

3. Convert the decimal to a percentage by multiplying by 100:
Percent error = 0.375 * 100 = 37.5%

4. Round to the nearest percent:
Percent error ≈ 38%

So, Michael's percent error in estimating his laps around the track was approximately 38%.

Learn more about percent error at https://brainly.in/question/2230099

#SPJ11

Answer: 26/100   OR     0.26  (I would put the answer as a fraction)

Step-by-step explanation:

We need both fractions to have the same denominator before we add them. The denominator of 6/100 is 100. The denominator of 2/10 is 10. We need to turn 10 into 100. To do that, we can do 10*10. This gives us 100. However what we do to the bottom must be done to the top therefore we have 20/100 + 6/100

Now the two fractions can be added together. 20/100 + 6/100 = 26/100.

Normally we would simplify this down to 13/50 but if you want it unsimplified 26/100 would be your answer.

When all 967 tickets are purchased, the probability of not winning is 0 (or 0%).

The probability of an event occurring is defined by probability. There are numerous real-life scenarios in which we must forecast the outcome of an occurrence.

To find the probability of not winning the TV with a given number of tickets, we need to calculate the ratio of the number of losing tickets to the total number of tickets. The completed table is as follows:

Number of Tickets | Number of Losing Tickets | Probability of Not Winning

-----------------|-------------------------|----------------------------

      0         |           967           |           1.000        

      1         |           966           |           0.999        

      10        |           957           |           0.990        

      50        |           917           |           0.948        

      100       |           867           |           0.897        

      200       |           767           |           0.793        

      300       |           667           |           0.690        

      400       |           567           |           0.587        

      500       |           467           |           0.483        

      600       |           367           |           0.380        

      700       |           267           |           0.277        

      800       |           167           |           0.173        

      900       |            67           |           0.069        

      967       |             0           |           0.000        

As the number of tickets purchased increases, the probability of not winning the TV decreases. When no tickets are purchased, the probability of not winning is 1 (or 100%). When all 967 tickets are purchased, the probability of not winning is 0 (or 0%).

Learn more about probability on:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

The numerical value of the two-sample t-statistic for this test is 0.414 . So, the correct option is A).

To determine if there is a significant difference in the mean bacterial concentration in air between carpeted and uncarpeted rooms, the two-sample t-test can be used.

First, we need to calculate the sample means and standard deviations for each group. The sample mean for the carpeted rooms is 22.0 with a standard deviation of 184, while the sample mean for the uncarpeted rooms is 16.9 with a standard deviation of 175.

Next, we can calculate the t-statistic using the formula

t = (x1 - x2) / (s1^2/n1 + s2^2/n2)^0.5

where x1 and x2 are the sample means, s1 and s2 are the sample standard deviations, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

Plugging in the values, we get

t = (22.0 - 16.9) / ((184^2/7 + 175^2/7)^0.5) = 0.414

Comparing the calculated t-value with the critical t-value for a two-tailed test with 12 degrees of freedom at a 0.05 significance level, we find that the critical t-value is 2.179. Since the calculated t-value is less than the critical t-value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no significant difference in the mean bacterial concentration in air between carpeted and uncarpeted rooms.

So, the correct answer is A).

To know more about t-statistic:

https://brainly.com/question/15236063

#SPJ4

The length of the diagonal of a wide screen TV with an area of 150 inches and an aspect ratio of 2.39:1 is approximately 11.25 inches.

Aspect ratio refers to the proportional relationship between the width and height of an image or screen. In the case of a wide screen TV, the aspect ratio is 2.39:1, which means that for every 2.39 units of width, there is 1 unit of height.

To find the length of the diagonal of a wide screen TV with an area of 150 inches, we need to use the Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the length of the diagonal is equal to the sum of the squares of the width and height.

First, we need to find the width and height of the TV screen. We can do this by setting up the equation:

2.39x^2 = 150

where x is the width of the screen. Solving for x, we get:

x = √(150/2.39) = 10.87 inches

Now we can find the height by dividing the width by the aspect ratio:

h = 10.87 / 2.39 = 4.55 inches

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can find the length of the diagonal:

d^2 = 10.87^2 + 4.55^2 = 126.68

d = √126.68 = 11.25 inches

Therefore, the length of the diagonal of a wide screen TV with an area of 150 inches and an aspect ratio of 2.39:1 is approximately 11.25 inches.

To know more about aspect ratio, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18492629#

#SPJ11

Answer:

x=81

Step-by-step explanation:

Rewrite log_3 (x)=4 in exponential form using the definition of a logarithm. If x and b are positive real numbers and b≠1, then log_b(x)=y is equivalent to b^y=x.

Rewrite the equation as x=3^4

Raise 3 to the power of 4 

x=81

"The computer refused to obtain the estimates because of perfect multicollinearity caused by including all possible fourth-order terms in the regression model."

Perfect multicollinearity occurs when there is an exact linear relationship between predictor variables in a regression model. In this case, including all possible fourth-order terms in X1 and X2 resulted in perfect multicollinearity.

When there is perfect multicollinearity, it becomes impossible to calculate the regression estimates using the standard formula, as the matrix (X'X)^-1 does not exist. The presence of perfect multicollinearity creates redundancy and ambiguity in the model, making it impossible for the computer routine to obtain valid estimates.

To address this issue, the experimenter decided to ignore the levels of variable X2 and fit a fourth-order model solely in X1. By focusing on one variable and excluding the other, the problem of perfect multicollinearity was resolved, and the regression model could be estimated successfully.

In conclusion, the computer refused to obtain the estimates due to perfect multicollinearity caused by including all possible fourth-order terms in the regression model. Ignoring one variable helped overcome the issue and allowed the experimenter to fit the desired fourth-order model.

To know more about multicollinearity refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30691253

#SPJ11

There are 42 yellow skittles in the box.

Based on the given information, we know that the ratio of green skittles to yellow skittles is 5:7. This means that for every 5 green skittles, there are 7 yellow skittles.

To find out how many yellow skittles are in the box, we need to know how many sets of 5 green skittles there are. We can do this by dividing the total number of skittles in the box (30) by 5 (since there are 5 green skittles for every set).
30 ÷ 5 = 6

This means there are 6 sets of 5 green skittles in the box.

Now we can use the ratio of 5:7 to find out how many yellow skittles there are in each set:
5 green skittles : 7 yellow skittles

Since there are 7 yellow skittles in each set, we can find the total number of yellow skittles by multiplying 7 by the number of sets (6):
7 x 6 = 42

There are 42 yellow skittles in the box.

To know more about "Ratio" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17223098#

#SPJ11

Answer:

13, 2x^2 - 98 = 0 ........ given

2x^2= 98 ........ take to tge left side no.98

x^2 = 98/2 = 49 ..... multiple both side by radical

x = √49 = 7 ........ simplify

17, 4x^2 + 10 = 11

4x^2 + 10 = 11 4x^2 = 11- 10 = 1

4x^2 + 10 = 11 4x^2 = 11- 10 = 1 x^2 = 1/4

4x^2 + 10 = 11 4x^2 = 11- 10 = 1 x^2 = 1/4 x = √1/4 = 1/2