The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
No, I don't think so. President Roosevelt was not justified in ordering executive order 9066 which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citizens. It is true that some of his cabinet members -such as the Secretary of Defense- believed that the executive order was necessary and justified. However, that order treated Japanese American people as a prisoner of war, isolated in the interim camps such as Manzanates, California, and that was not a way to treat an American citizen.
For some historians, those camps resemble in concept, the Nazi camps of World War II, taking into consideration the proportions of this comparison.
Besides, there was no real evidence that proved that these Japanese Americans were species or had ties with the Japanese Army.
Answer:
here's my essay I wrote for this question on edge:
Was President Roosevelt justified in ordering Executive Order 9066? No, he was not. All it did was result in the internment of Japanese American citizens, even though that wasn't what was specified in the order. Roosevelt was not justified in making this decision because it led to splitting up families, arresting innocent people, and denying their rights.
The Executive Order 9066 authorized the military to keep out “any or all persons from areas of the United States designated as military areas.” However, the order did not identify any particular group, but Roosevelt used it to remove and imprison Japanese and Japanese-American citizens. It ended up condemning almost 70% of imprisoned Japanese-American Citizens. Even if they were American but had some sort of Japanese descent, they would incarcerate them. All of this was okay because of the Executive Order 9066.
Where did these innocent citizens go when they were removed and imprisoned? They were brought into wartime camps and were suspended of their rights under Fifth Amendment. The order Roosevelt passes, allowed the suspension and so, the Japanese Americans were denied their rights. The Fifth Amendment states that 'no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process.' This is a world-wide known right. Yet, Roosevelt just takes it away because he simply feels he needs to? That's scary knowing that the president could take everybody's rights away in a second if they wanted to. Not is it only scary, but it is not justified.
However, many people believe that Roosevelt was under good reasoning when passing the order. Some people will argue it helped public safety. People who are on that side of this argument tend to believe that he was also justified because of the hatred and fear against the Japanese Americans after the Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor. This theory continued to expand, leading to a common belief that the Japanese-Americans had been of help to the Japanese in planning the attack.
Despite those beliefs, Roosevelt was impartially wrong in his ordering of Executive Order 9066. While it may have been true that many Americans were fearful of the Japanese, this is not a reason of why Roosevelt was justified. This is because they did not only intern Japanese and Japanese-Americans. They also interned thousands of others including Italian and German-Americans. So, even though people were supposedly scared of the Japanese, fear was obviously not the only reason they interned innocent American citizens.
It's understandable how, on impulse, people can believe that Roosevelt was justified in interning millions of Americans. But, if you look deeper into it, that is clearly not the case. Executive Order 9066 was an inhumane and unjustified order that ruined many Americans lives and tore apart thousands of families. So, in conclusion, Roosevelt was not justified in issuing Executive Order 9066.
hope this helps! for plagiarism reasons.. change it up a bit so that u don't get in trouble by ur teacher ahaha good luck!
In which colony did the spread of slavery lead to a population with more Africans than Europeans around 1750? *
South Carolina
Massachusetts
Virginia
Answer:
South Carolina
Explanation:
2. How did the Supreme court decisions Worcester v. Georgia affect the Native Americans
Answer:
Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land. Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent law in the United States regarding Native Americans. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.Worcester's decision was important in terms of the Native American rights because he was there to help the Native Americans not be scared of the Supreme Court. That they can fight and stay where they are. In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice John Marshall, the Court held that the Georgia act, under which Worcester was prosecuted, violated the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States.
Explanation:
When did the rise of big businesses began
answer is option d just before world War two
What was a characteristic of the Shang dynasty? PLEASE HELP
Answer:
A
Explanation:
because it was a government creeated by the chinese, its not C because most of the governments back then were controlling governments, communism wasn’t created back then either.
Answer:
It used farming methods that created a food surplus to feed the people
Explanation:
What is this dog remembering?
Answer:
The war that it's/his owner been through? WW1?
Explanation:
I'm not quite sure but I'm sure it has two pictures, one with people on war, and a dog.
Perspective of Native American for westward expansion
Answer:
Native Americans didn't like it because their land was being taken away. They didn't have many choices. Tribes suffered greatly as the United States government took more and more land. They had to leave the rivers, forests, and mountains and move to a very different topography.
Explanation:
If the Majority Party losses the next election in the House , the person most likely to be the next Speaker of the House is ?
Answer:
The person most likely to be the president of the House is the candidate who received the largest number of electoral votes.
Explanation:
The idea is that the president of the House of Representatives is the candidate who received the absolute majority of the votes, which is usually the candidate who belongs to the marjoritary party in the House. However, if that candidate does not receive an absolute majority of votes, it is most likely that the candidate who received the highest number of electoral votes will be promoted to president of the House.
PLEASE HELP my scary mom wants me to do edge write now an I dont get this question
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional questions.
Online Content: Site 1
Online Content: Site 2
What were the goals of the KKK during Reconstruction?
Answer:
The KKK resurged not only targeting African Americans, but any immigrants who were in America creating more racial tensions. These tensions created a nasty election in 1928, tension from the whites in the South and the growing melting pot of the North.
Explanation:
The KKK, founded by Confederate soldiers, opposed Radical Reconstruction. They targeted Freedmen's Bureau schools as they believed African Americans should not be educated. burned the schools down and attacked and killed white teachers and black students. Targeted carpetbaggers and scalawags. They saw them all as a threat to the power of white Southerners.
World War I has begun. You are the leader of a
European country and must decide what to do. Your
nation is one of several that have agreed to support each other in the event of war. Some of your allies
already have joined the fight. You oppose the thought of war and fear that joining will lead to even
more lives lost. Yet, you believe in being loyal to your allies. You also worry that your rivals want to
conquer all of Europe and if you don't join the war now, your country may end up having to defend
itself.
Should you always support a friend, no matter what he or she does? What might be the long-term
consequences of refusing to help an ally? In your opinion, what are reasons for going to war that might
justify the death and destruction that inevitably result? Essay
What are the basic beliefs Of Hinduism and Buddhism?
Answer:
Buddhism and Hinduism agree on karma, dharma, moksha and reincarnation. They are different in that Buddhism rejects the priests of Hinduism, the formal rituals, and the caste system. Buddha urged people to seek enlightenment through meditation.
Explanation:
well that's it.
One way the government promoted assimilation in the 1800's was to forbid American Indian children
a from speaking their languages
b from adopting a new way of life
c from changing their religions
d from seeking an education
brainlist WILL be given
Answer: A from speaking their languages
Explanation:
Check the flashcard on Quizlet
https://quizlet.com/515186612/utr-ah1-flash-cards/
Answer:
A. From speaking their languages.
Explanation:
I got 100% on the test.
Guys plz help me and answer the question
Plz I will give brainliest
Answer:
1. They said that they make over 8 billion candy hearts within 6 weeks before february they are all sold out.
2. The shell shaped candies and the conversation hearts are similar because they both had little messages with it or on it.
3. The shell shaped candies and the conversation hearts were different because one was shaped like a heart and the other was shaped like a shell. They were also different because the message is on the candy in conversation hearts while the message is on a paper inside of the shell shaped candies.
4 it says in the passage that, " these candies allowed for longer printed messages." So basically they enlarged the candy for more space on the candy for the message.
5 (for this one its mostly your opinion and there is no wrong answer but this is what i would have put.) I think that they update the sweet hearts every year because the public might ask for it and if the public wants it they will change the message to whatever for business reasons.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
1) Every year the company makes 8 billion conversation hearts and all the 8 billion candies are sold within the first 6 weeks of Valentine's day.
2) Both conversation hearts and shell candies came with messages.
3) Shell shaped candy had messages that were rolled up inside of them and were printed on thin paper.
But conversation hearts the message were pressed on the candy's.
4) The larger candies allowed to print larger messages like, " How long shall I have to wait? Pray be considerate".
5) Everything changes over time as per the requirements and wishes of the consumers
What was Joseph Stalin's main goal for the Soviet Union?
A. Colonial independence
B. Rapid industrialization
C. Military reductions
D. Democratic reforms
Joseph Stalin's main goal for the Soviet Union was rapid industrialization. Hence, the correct answer is option B.
Who was Joseph Stalin?Joseph Stalin was a Soviet politician who led the Soviet Union from the mid-1920s until his death in 1953. He served as both the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the Premier of the Soviet Union, and was one of the most prominent and controversial figures of the 20th century.
Joseph Stalin's main goal for the Soviet Union was to rapidly industrialize and modernize the country, making it a major industrial power. He believed that this would strengthen the Soviet Union and help it catch up with the industrialized countries of the West.
Therefore, Joseph Stalin's main goal for the Soviet Union was rapid industrialization. Hence, the correct answer is option B.
Learn more about Joseph Stalin, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28767694
#SPJ5
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
a.
The Confederate Constitution made it illegal to free a slave in the South.
b.
Texas joined the Confederate States of America and seceded from the Union.
c.
Elected officials in Texas were required to take an oath of loyalty to the Confederacy after Texas seceded.
d.
After Lincoln was elected President, new territories that originally wanted to join the Union joined the Confederacy instead.
Answer:
it's D
Explanation:
Answer:
answer is d
(i keep getting deleted)
Describe actions taken by Louis XIV that show this individual was an absolute ruler:
Answer:
An absolute monarchy is one in which the king is God's representative on Earth, giving him absolute power that's free from all restraints. He created a centralized state that gave him complete power over the French government. King Louis XIV was an absolute monarch because he answered only to God.
Explanation:
If there were 20,528 voyages made by ships and 12 million slaves, how large was the average human cargo aboard a ship?
Answer:
About 585 slaves aboard each ship.
Explanation:
If you divide the amount of voyages (20,528) by the number of slaves (12,000,000) you will get a decimal that rounds up to 585.
Step one) Divide the number of slaves by the number of voyages
12,000,000 ÷ 20,528 = 584.5Step two) Round your answer to the nearest whole number
584.5 ≈ 585Hope this helps!
What impact has Queen Lili'uokalani had on Hawaii?
Answer:
Queen Lili'uokalani unified the Hawaiian kingdom, she organized schools for Hawaii's youth, and she was the first queen of Hawaii.
Explanation:
^^
Barbed wire entanglement were often 40 yards (36m) from the front trench considering the types of weapon used on the western front, what would be their main defensive function
Answer:
The main function was to create a line of defense for the trenches.
Explanation:
Barbed wire was essential during the "trench war" which is the first world war.
This is because the army dug trenches in the ground so that soldiers could attack the enemy army while they were inside those trenches. Between the trenches of each army, there was a free space called "no man's land" that was used for soldiers to leave their trenches and enter the enemy trenches. To prevent this, barbed wire was used to protect the trenches and provide an obstacle for enemy soldiers.
13. What was the "First Hundred Days"?
A. the waiting period between FDR winning the presidency and taking office
B. roughly the first three months of FDR's presidency
C. the time between FDR taking office and the introduction of the first New Deal programs
D. the length of the bank holiday FDR called for in March 1933
I’ll give brainiest
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Im not a 100 % but i know that he took office on March 4 1933 and he didnt start any of the new deals until after the 100th day which was June 11th 1933.
They still use the term the first 100 days soo i hope this helps and i hope you get the right answer.
Answer:
roughly the first three months of FDR's presidency
Explanation:
took the test
What evidence does King use to support his claim that
protests are effective and appropriate?
O Protests direct the violence at city leaders.
O Protests make city leaders confront the crisis.
O Protests prevent bombings and violence.
O Protests are useless and never result in action.
Answer:
Protests make city leaders confront the crisis
Explanation:
edg
Answer: B.) Protests make city leaders confront the crisis.
Explanation: just did it :)
During the Carolingian Renaissance, what was created out of the educational reforms, which unified Western Europe?
Group of answer choices
math
English
Medieval Latin
history
Answer: Medieval Latin
Explanation:
Answer:
★ The answer is MEDIEVAL LATIN
Explanation:
Hope you have a great day :)
What event signaled the beginning of institutional segregation? *10pts
Answer:
I believe it is A
Explanation: This law started in the 1880's believe
How can we prevent genocides from happening in the future? Explain your answer
Answer:
Recognition of triggering factors, early warning systems, political will and international coordination are positive steps in the active prevention of genocide. Recognition of Triggering Factors Recognizing triggering factors for genocide is crucial. Several events can indicate an increased risk for genocidal acts:
What do you think would have happened if the British government had repealed the Tea Act after realizing how unpopular it would be in the American colonies?
If the British government had repealed the Tea
If the British government had repealed the Tea Act they would have a loss of money due to them buying so much tea tell sell in the colonies and no one to buy it.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 differed from earlier attempts to address minority rights by focusing on —
protecting the voting rights of minorities
ending discrimination in the workplace
desegregating the schools
reforming immigration policies
Answer:
2
Explanation:
Answer:
ending discrimination in the workplace
Explanation:
29. What was Roosevelt's purpose in “packing the courts”?
a. to attempt to racially balance the Supreme Court
b. to minimize opposition to his New Deal legislation
c. to give the Supreme Court more power to make decisions
d. to allow the Supreme Court to equally represent citizens
Answer:
b. to minimize opposition to his new deal legislation
Explanation:
"Roosevelt to add more justices to the U.S. Supreme Court in order to obtain favorable rulings regarding New Deal legislation that the Court had ruled unconstitutional."
Q.17 According to the census
1921, 12 to 13 million peop
perished in India as a result
(a) Famines
(b) Epidemic
(C) First world war
(d) Both (a) and (b)
Please guys help me help me
Answer:
The answer is C. first world war
Explanation:
The city of Gahanna, Ohio wants to build a new pool to be used by the Mayor. The
city finds a good plot of land that is currently owned by the Henderson family and
plans to enact eminent domain to take it to build the pool. The Henderson family has
lived in that home since 1988, are retired, and do not want to move.
What argument might the Henderson family make to the court system?
Only the national government can practice eminent domain
They want free pool passes to the Mayor's new pool
The city is not taking their home for public use
The city must offer them at least triple the fair market value of their home
6. How did Caesar acquire his riches?
Answer:
Marcus Licinius Crassus is considered to be the wealthiest man in Roman history. Extremely adept at making money, he parlayed that success into leading positions in government and the military but was ultimately undone by a series of unwise decisions.
The son of a well-known senator who also served as consul and censor, Crassus began his public life by marrying the wife of his recently dead older brother and allying himself with Sulla, who later ruled Rome as dictator. Crassus led a group of soldiers who won a crucial battle that turned the tide of the civil war.
This alliance proved fruitful for Crassus's ambitions of wealth. As Sulla set about getting rid of his opponents, Crassus followed up by buying their properties at cut-rate prices and then selling them at large profits. He had amassed quite a fortune by this time and had hundreds of slaves at the ready.
Crassus made quite a name for himself by taking advantage of owners whose buildings were burning. Fires were quite common in Rome, yet the city did not have an organized firefighting force. According to several sources, Crassus would rush to a burning building, buy it from the owner, then order his slave-labor firefighters to put out the fire. Crassus would then spruce up the building, using his slave labor, and sell the building at a profit.
He also made quite a bit of money buying and selling slaves and getting the most out of a group of silver mines that his family owned. As a result, he amassed a huge fortune and became powerful and well-known on the strength of his wealth.
Crassus had political and military ambitions and used his wealth to pursue them. He befriended the young, brilliant general Julius Caesar, in part by offering to help finance Caesar's frequent military campaigns. Meanwhile, Crassus was moving up the political ladder. He held the rank of praetor when the Spartacus-led slave revolt broke out, in 73 B.C. After the brilliant slave leader led his men through a series of victories against better-equipped Roman legions, Crassus offered up his own wealth to finance an army to fight Spartacus. Crassus it was who finally defeated Spartacus, ensuring that he was dead and then crucifying 6,000 surviving slaves on the road from Rome to Capua, as a deterrent to future revolt leaders.
Crassus was not the only Roman gaining fame and fortune, however. The aforementioned Caesar was proving his worth in matters military and legal. The greatest general, in terms of field victories, was Pompey, who had secured the ongoing enmity between himself and Crassus by claiming credit for ending the slave revolt by capturing a few thousand slaves in a mop-up operation after Crassus had defeated Spartacus.
Despite this, Crassus and Pompey were named consuls in 70 B.C. Already jealous of each other, they grew even moreso as they shared power. Consulship was only for a year, and the two served in other posts after that. For the next few years, Crassus and Caesar cemented their alliance by doing political and monetary favors for each other.
Crassus and Pompey were still the two most powerful figures in Rome and still did not trust each other. Caesar, sensing an opportunity, convinced them both to take control of the government together, along with him, in what came to be known as the First Triumvirate, in 60 B.C.
As part of the arrangement, Crassus took control of Syria, a wealthy province that, he hoped, would give him even more wealth and an opportunity for more military triumphs. He hoped to lead forces through Syria to attack the Parthians, at the time harassing Rome's eastern flank.
Crassus and Pompey again served as consuls in 55. That same year, the Triumvirate nearly fell apart. Caesar called the other two together at the Lucca Conference, however, and smoothed things over enough for the arrangement to continue.
While Pompey was solidifying his hold on Spain and Caesar was invading Britain and subduing Gaul, Crassus launched his attack on Parthia. It was not at all a success. He was undone by treachery and impetuosity, being the victim of both a double-cross by a supposed neutral party and his own desire to rush into glory rather than fight on terms more favorable to his troops. Thus it was at Carrhae in 53 that a greater Roman infantry force was defeated by an inferior Parthian force of cavalry and archers and Crassus himself was killed in the fighting. Accounts of the details surrounding his death differ. All agree, however, that he did not return to Rome except to be buri
Explanation:
Answer:
Julius Caesar began his rise to power in 60 B.C.E. by forging an alliance with another general, Pompey, and a wealthy patrician, Crassus. ... Upon his return, Caesar made himself dictator and absolute ruler of Rome and its territories. During his rule, he enacted several reforms.
Explanation:
Re write in slope intercept form: 6x+5y=-15
Answer:
6x + 5y = −15 6 x + 5 y = - 15 The slope-intercept form is y = mx+ b y = m x + b, where m m is the slope and b b is the y-intercept. y = mx +b y = m x + b Rewrite in slope-intercept form.
Explanation:
6x + 5y = −15 6 x + 5 y = - 15 The slope-intercept form is y = mx+ b y = m x + b, where m m is the slope and b b is the y-intercept. y = mx +b y = m x + b Rewrite in slope-intercept form.