The story “Hans in Luck” by the Brothers Grimm revolves around the main character’s personality. The character Hans easily believes what others tell him. That means Hans is a gullible person.

Which line in this excerpt from the story supports the idea that Hans is gullible?

Seven long years he had worked hard for his master. At last he said, “Master, my time is up; I must go home and see my poor mother once more: so pray pay me my wages and let me go.” And the master said, “You have been a faithful and good servant, Hans, so your pay shall be handsome.” Then he gave him a lump of silver as big as his head.

Hans took out his pocket-handkerchief, put the piece of silver into it, threw it over his shoulder, and jogged off on his road homewards. As he went lazily on, dragging one foot after another, a man came in sight, trotting gaily along on a capital horse.

“Ah!” said Hans aloud, “what a fine thing it is to ride on horseback! There he sits as easy and happy as if he was at home, in the chair by his fireside; he trips against no stones, saves shoe-leather, and gets on he hardly knows how.”

Hans did not speak so softly but the horseman heard it all, and said, “Well, friend, why do you go on foot then?”

“Ah!” said he, “I have this load to carry: to be sure it is silver, but it is so heavy that I can't hold up my head, and you must know it hurts my shoulder sadly.”

“What do you say of making an exchange?” said the horseman. “I will give you my horse, and you shall give me the silver; which will save you a great deal of trouble in carrying such a heavy load about with you.”

“With all my heart,” said Hans: “but as you are so kind to me, I must tell you one thing—you will have a weary task to draw that silver about with you.”

However, the horseman got off, took the silver, helped Hans up, gave him the bridle into one hand and the whip into the other, and said, “When you want to go very fast, smack your lips loudly together, and cry ‘Jip!'”

1) As I sat on what I thought was my deathbed, I believed that leaf was connected to my life force. That once it became dry and fell, I would die along with it.

2) The leaf was special to me because I believed that we were the same. Just waiting for the day we were blown away in an angry storm. We both were just barely hanging on until we died.

Hope this helps! If you need me to change anything just let me know, and I'll be happy to switch up my answer a bit! :D

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

I think its d

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is an infinitive.

Explanation:

Answer:

I jut got them all right so i hope this helps! :))

Explanation:

respects the law of the jungle, even though the law says he must die. - Akela

bends the law of the jungle to get what he wants. - Shere Khan

The law of the jungle helps  protect from those who wish him harm. - Mowgli

By following the law of the jungle, able to save Mowgli. - Bagheera

Answer:

A(respects the law of the jungle, even though the law says he must die)

Explanation:

hope it is correct :)

Answer: A

Explanation:

Answer:

d

Explanation:

The slow pace helps develop Mr. Whymper’s character with descriptive details.  I took the test and got it right

Answer:

I got this answer a long time ago,

Explanation:

I think that the answer for this one is because I know that she doesn´t draw a picture, and I know that she doesn´t have empathy, and I know that she wouldn´t pick the flowers from the garden, so I think the answer is B- she shook her hand. I hope this helps!

Answer:

She shook her hand.

I hope this helps

Answer:

1st

Explanation:

informal and formal tones make a contrast because they are different tones

Answer: Both articles include the Grand Canyon as a very famous US landmark.

Explanation: the sentence compares that both articles include the same topic

Answer:

1. Characters and conflicts are introduced at the beginning of the work.

2. Tension builds through a series of conflicts.

3. The key to suspense is to resolve the conflict near the end of the work.

Explanation:

The characters and conflicts of a literary work must be presented at the beginning of the work as they allow the reader to identify them and establish interest in the personality of each character and in how they will resolve the conflicts in which they are involved. These conflicts are presented progressively in the work and the more conflicts are presented the more the tension increases. The solution to these conflicts must be found near the end of the narrative because it holds the reader in the work and generates suspense.

Answer:

Characters and conflicts are introduced EARLY IN THE PLAY

Tension builds through a series of CONFLICTS

The key to suspense is to resolve the conflict NEAR THE END OF THE PLAY

Explanation:

https://brainly.com/question/16204177

Answer:

D

Explanation:

A proverb is a simple, concrete, traditional saying that expresses a perceived truth based on common sense or experience. Proverbs are often metaphorical and use formulaic language. Collectively, they form a genre of folklore.

Have a great day :)

Answer:The answer is D

Explanation:

A short saying usually of unknown and ancient origin, that expresses effectively some common place truth or useful though.

Answer:

sup

Explanation:

well i walk home

its a nice alone time

when its sunny when its raining i always like the walk home

its quiet

and i can just plug my headphones in and listen to music for that 20min walk

when i listen to my music everythign around me just dissolves away

its just me and my music and my surroundings

i dont rly have too many friends so no i dont go over to anyone's house after school

walking back from my school i have two difrerent routes

one is walking through town whcih is crowded noisy and a shorter route

and the other is taking the nice side paths and just having a quiet place to just be with myself for once

and yeah i typically take the side paths but occassionally ya girl needs coffee so we gotta go through town ahahah

but yeah my walk home from school is very calming and its good exercise too

also i can walk at my own pace cuz everyone says i walk too slow for them but i can just be myself

its pretty awesome

Answer:

A.

But according to my own version of the ELA quiz:

B.

Explanation:

I took an ELA quiz and got it 100% correct! Have a perfect day/night!

Rhythm creates a choppy pace that reflects the uncertainty of life. Hence, option B is correct.

In poetry, rhythm refers to the pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables within a line or stanza. It is a crucial aspect of the poem's overall sound and musicality, and it can greatly affect the reader's experience of the work. Poets can create a wide variety of rhythms and meters, which can affect the tone, mood, and overall impact of the poem.

Rhythm creates a choppy pace that reflects the uncertainty of life, this is how it contributes to the poem's meaning in "the new Colossus".

Learn more about rhythm, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13999950

#SPJ2

Answer:

A

Explanation:

He shows that other explorers don't have the same motivations as him, but he will try and use space exploration for good and not for evil.

Answer:

a b d e    i think

Explanation:

Olá. Essa pergunta esta incompleta. A pergunta completa é:

Estava em casa com muita vontade de sair, porém eu me sentia meio down ,para ver se melhorava um pouco tomei um banho

Explique o significado da expressão em inglês na frase acima.

Answer:

A palavra "down" significa que o narrador da frase estava se sentindo triste.

Explanation:

A palavra "down" em inglês significa "para baixo". Ela pode ser utilizada de forma conotativa para expressar um estado de espirito diminuto, o que significa que uma pessoa esta triste, desmotivada, melancólica e sem vitalidade. Nesse caso, quando o narrador afirma "estava me sentindo meio down" ele quer dizer que estava se sentindo triste.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

can i have brainly plz

Answer:

On Wednesday, Virginia became the 38th state to vote to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment — thus fulfilling the requirement that three-quarters of the states must approve an Amendment in order to add it to the U.S. Constitution. Since the Amendment was proposed a century ago, the U.S. has never been so close to enshrining the equality of all people, regardless of sex, in its bedrock legal document.  

But that doesn’t mean the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) will be added to the Constitution any time soon. There will likely be a long fight in the courts or in the U.S. legislature before that happens, as the legislators who originally passed the Amendment in 1972 set, and then extended, a time limit for ratification by the states. That deadline passed more than three decades ago.    

Decades would pass before the Equal Rights Amendment would gain real momentum. By that point, both men and women had won protections in the workplace, and the women of the second-wave feminist movement — including some who had participated in the fight for civil rights in the 1960s — were pushing for equality in their jobs, universities and homes. The Equal Rights Amendment was written by Alice Paul (1885-1977), the founder of the National Woman’s Party.  

Born to a New Jersey family of Quakers who highly valued education, Paul studied at colleges and universities in the U.S. and the United Kingdom and earned an impressive number of degrees, including a Master’s and doctorate in sociology from the University of Pennsylvania, a law degree from Washington College of Law, and law Master’s and doctoral degrees from American University. But her life’s work really came into focus after she joined demonstrations for the British suffragist movement in the early 1900s. When she returned to the U.S. in 1910, she pushed American suffragists to try the confrontational techniques she’d seen applied in Britain, including civil disobedience.  

Concerned that the National American Woman Suffrage Association was too moderate, in 1913 Paul and Lucy Burns formed the Congressional Union for Woman Suffrage, which was later reconstituted as the National Woman’s Party, and employed more aggressive tactics. The group used parades, petitions, protests and pickets to push for the right to vote. In 1917, Paul was sentenced to seven months in prison for picketing the White House, and was force-fed after going on a prison hunger strike.  

After women successfully won the right to vote in 1920, the National Woman’s Party turned its attention to the next steps. Jessica Neuwirth, a women’s rights lawyer and a founder of the ERA Coalition, a current-day campaign to pass the amendment, tells TIME that suffrage advocates saw their work as remedying the intentional omission of women from the U.S. Constitution.  

Paul’s crusade in the 1920s was unsuccessful, but in the 1950s, Michigan Congresswoman Martha Griffiths took up the torch. A former judge elected to the House in 1954, Griffiths worked to have sex discrimination added to Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and pushed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to double down on its enforcement of the Act. She also introduced the amendment on the House floor every year, but was unsuccessful until 1970, when Griffiths filed a discharge position that forced the legislation out of committee and led to the amendment being passed by the House. Although the Senate failed to pass it that legislative session, Griffiths reintroduced it the following year. It passed the House on Oct. 12, 1971 and the Senate on March 22, 1972. In passing the Equal Rights Amendment, Congress had set a seven-year deadline for ratification.      

“Well, if you fast forward to 2019, without the Equal Rights Amendment having passed, we’re trying to figure out how to deal with bathrooms in a multi-gendered universe. And we’re trying to figure out, should in fact women be drafted if men are drafted?” says Condit. ”And while we were are unsettled as a culture about these new questions, they did not fail to emerge because we didn’t have an Equal Rights Amendment.” \  

Condit notes that many of the states that failed to pass the Equal Rights Amendment had few women in their state legislatures, and historically had poor records of protecting the rights of both women and people of color. Virginia legislators’ decision to approve the Equal Rights Amendment means that the Amendment has fulfilled the requirement for three-fourths of the states to ratify a Constitutional Amendment. However, the ERA still faces another major obstacle: a past Congress had set a deadline for the Amendment’s ratification.            

Going forward, that means that Congress could potentially vote to eliminate the deadline, or it could be challenged in court. Although American women have made significant gains in equality since the 1970s — and certainly since the 1920s — advocates say that an Equal Rights Amendment could still have a profound effect on the law and on American society.    

Explain:

Answer:

Explanation:

The author of “The Cold Equations” most likely wants you to believe that Marilyn was supposed to get thrown overboard. She was threatened to be killed and this excerpt clearly shows the idea , so it will definitely help you:

“You mean it — you really mean it.” She sagged back against the wall, small and limp like a little rag doll,and all the protesting and disbelief gone. “You’re going to do it — you’re going to make me die?” “I’m sorry,” he said again. “You’ll never know how sorry I am. It has to be that way and no human in the universe can change it.”

Answer:

a

Explanation:

if they take pride in their reputation they dont wanna get caught cheating because it will ruin their reputation so it is very unlikely they will cheat

Its A i did the test And got it right

Alone. No one to hold your hand. You try to ask for help, but no one believes you. Did I do this right? Did that sound weird? Please don't make fun of me. Feeling of worry. Feeling that you're not enough. Feeling.. Lost. Your whole life feels wasted. You can't see it but it's there. This invisible monstrosity upon you. Every night you lay in your bed crying, wanting this to be over.  

Another day, same routine. Get up, school, sleep. For what? A picture. Of You and (insert friend name here)  (insert activity) You find your box of old (activity supplies) a smile on your face. You pick the (activity supplies) up and start playing with it how you used to. ( Add more memories and a ending) Please give brainiliest!

Answer:

As the Genocide Convention of 1948 states, “at all periods of history genocide has inflicted great losses on

humanity” (Kaye and Stråth 2000: 24). Nevertheless, the twentieth century was termed the “century of genocide”

because of the high number of cases of genocide during that time period (Bartrop 2002: 522). For the purpose of this

essay, the definition of genocide will be taken from the Genocide Convention, which defines genocide as “intent to

destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. The genocide of the Armenians, the

Holocaust and the genocide in Rwanda are the three genocides of the twentieth century that fit that definition

(Destexhe 1994: 4-5). In this essay, the causes of modern genocide will be investigated using these three genocides

as case studies. There are various reasons why genocide may occur and it is often a combination of circumstances

that leads to genocide. The present essay will investigate the underlying conditions that make genocide possible,

while leaving out catalytic events that may trigger genocide. The essay will firstly draw on the works of Horkheimer

and Adorno in examining the relations between Enlightenment ideas and genocide. The correlations between war

and economic crises will be subject to analysis in the second part of the essay. Finally, the creation of out-groups and

in-groups will be explored. While these are certainly not the only causes of genocide, they may be deemed to be preconditions.

Raphael Lemkin coined the term “genocide” in the 1940s with the Holocaust in mind, which for him signified the

return of an enlightened people to barbarism (Freeman 1995: 210). Similarly, Foster (1980: 2) sees the Holocaust as

an aberration of an enlightened and developed nation. However, there are other scholars who argue that genocide is

not an exception of Enlightenment but in fact a result of it. Horkheimer and Adorno (1973: 3-4) argue that the ideals of

Enlightenment, which are human emancipation and rationality, alienate humans from nature and result in men

wanting to control nature and, in turn, other people as well. Bauman (1989: 91), continuing this idea over a decade

later, proposes that since the Enlightenment, the extermination of a people serves to establish a perfect society. The

Enlightenment brought with it the belief in an evolutionary development towards a better society through state

engineering (Bauman 1989: 70; Kaye and Stråth 2000: 11). “Gardening” and “modern medicine” were used as

metaphors for human tasks that would improve a society (Bauman 1989: 70). In the enlightened world, a state can

become a “wonderful utopia” (Hamburg 2008: 44) through “designing, cultivating and weed-poisoning” (Bauman1989: 13). It is a modern idea that everything can be measured and classified, even a “race” and its character

(Bauman 1989: 68). This classification of races, coupled with the modern idea of a constantly improvable society,

leads to Social-Darwinist ideas of the survival of the fittest (Kaye and Stråth 2000: 15).

Armenians (Balakian 2008: 160), Jews (Bauman 1989: 76) and Tutsi (Mullen 2006: 172) were seen as worthless

groups standing between a population and the realisation of such a perfect society. Therefore, in the mind of the

“rational and enlightened” thinker, they were legitimate targets for extermination (Kaye and Stråth 2000: 15). This

“purifying” of the state through genocide is reflected in the language of the genocidaires (Stone 2004: 50).

Armenians were termed “tubercular microbes” and a local politician asked rhetorically “isn’t it the duty of a doctor to

destroy these microbes?” (Balakian 2008: 160). Hitler spoke of the “Jewish virus” and that “by eliminating the pest,

[he would] do humanity a service” (Bauman 1989: 71). Not only medical terms were used to justify the killings.

Gardening metaphors can also be found. In Rwanda, the chopping up of Tutsi men was called “bush clearing” and

slaughtering women and children was labelled as “pulling out the roots of the bad weeds” (Prunier 1997: 142). These

three examples support Bauman’s theory that the Enlightenment brought about the idea of being able to socially

engineer a perfect state. Genocide was consequently justified by the idea of “purifying” the state through tasks that a doctor or a gardener would employ in order to improve an unhealthy body or a garden.

Explanation: Your welcome by the way

Answer:

Genocide is the act in which one kills everybody who stands in their path. They may believe that said people are out to get them, so they must get rid of them first so that they can survive. They may do this due to mental health issues, regret, vengeance, or even just to do it. Genocide does not always have an explanation, but it is very important to find who is committing said act in time before more die. These criminals may be a serial killer looking for something to fill some kind of void in their lives where someone left them with. They may even just be seeking thrill! Some people kill just for the rush in their adrenalin! While one may think this is absurd, it seems to be pretty common. look at H.H. Holmes (Henry Howard Holmes). He built a mansion, known as the murder mansion, in which had several traps. A few of these traps were doors that led to brick walls, stair cases that led no where, and even gas-filled hotel rooms. He was convicted as a serial killer and was sentenced to death, surprisingly for only one murder. He died on May 7th, 1896.

I hope this helps! I learned about him in criminal justice II, so I really hope it's okay enough for a good grade! have a nice day!!

Answer:

re reading repeating

Explanation:

option 3 belived

because in sentence say the meaning

Answer: a

Explanation:

Answer: its a

Pilgrims ate turkey on the first Thanksgiving.

Explanation: i got it right