Answer:
C) An increase in price leads to a decrease in supply
Instant access to information has helped Country F
Country F has just learned that farmers are starting to
report shortages of wheat this year due to failed
crops. Government leaders have decided that the wheat
produced will not be sold to anyone outside of the
country to ensure that there will be enough to fulfill the
needs of citizens.
Country F is using data from its farmers to
Answer: Country F is using data from it's farmers to make economic decision and instant access allowed them to allocate resources.
Explanation:
Data are information that is gathered for processing. They can be facts or statistics that has be collated for analysis. Most farmers have a good record keeping system of the day to day activities of the farm,production process, sales and purchase. all this information are gathered so as to know more on the daily activities of the farm. These Data can help also in making economic decision. Decisions that will boast the economy and also avoid pitfalls.
Country F was able to use the data from its farmers to make economic decisions.
Benefits of having informational access to citizens Governments can learn about issues sooner. Governments can mitigate issues before they become worse.In conclusion, thanks to the instant access to information that the leadership of Country F has with its citizens, they were able to make economic decisions to help the nation quickly.
Find out more on economic decision making at https://brainly.com/question/2495450.
If Jim chooses job A, he will receive $50,000 a year, full benefits and 2 weeks of paid vacation. If he chooses job B he will receive $60,000 a year, full benefits and no paid vacation. Assuming Jim chooses job B, which statement is correct?
A. Jim’s opportunity cost is only the $50,000 he could have received at the other job.
B. Jim’s opportunity cost is everything he is gaining at job B.
C. Jim’s opportunity cost is everything he gave up at job A.
D. Jim has incurred no opportunity cost because the jobs were completely different
Answer:
a
Explanation:
i know what im talkin bout
Answer:
C is the right answer
Since the probability that a new marriage will end in divorce varies based on whether either of the newly-weds has been divorced before, these two outcomes (the fate of the new marriage and the previous divorce record of the newly-weds) are: Group of answer choices
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not include options, we can say the following.
Since the probability that a new marriage will end in divorce varies based on whether either of the newly-weds has been divorced before, these two outcomes (the fate of the new marriage and the previous divorce record of the newly-weds) are dependent.
The variables are dependent because they influence the faith of the new couple when getting married. If one had the unfortunate experience of the divorce in its previous relationship, it could impact the direction of its new marriage. It cannot be mutually exclusive because this term means that the events cannot happen at the same moment.
It is sometimes argued that nation should not depend too heavily on other countries for supplies of certain key products. This argument is commonly known as the _______________. Group of answer choices
Answer:
National Interest Argument
Explanation:
National Interest Argument for protectionism is a term commonly used in socio-political or economic related matters, in which it is stated or believed that it is unwise or unsafe to import certain key products because if in the event, the nation becomes dependent on those key imported supplies, it could be vulnerable to a cutoff. For example, such as oil, ammunitions or for special materials or technologies that might have national security applications.
Hence, the right answer is NATIONAL INTEREST ARGUMENT.
State four benefits of the youth participation in community anti-substance abuse campaigns
Answer:
hi here goes your answer
Explanation:
1. Morals and characters are developed
2. Youths listen to youths because they can influence each other therefore they serve as advisors and recruiter in prevention programmes.
3. A foundation for a good adult life.
4. A direct reflection of what youths want an need
There are various benefits to invite youth in a campaign. The four benefits of youth participation in a community anti-substance abuse campaigns are:
1. Increased Competency and knowledge
2. Morals and characters are developed.
3. Increased status and better adult life.
4. Youth will be impressed by youth, so its best way to let them influence each other in the campaign.
Youth are the younger generations which will become ultimately an adult in future.
They will form a foundation for future adults. If a youth is involved in anti substance abuse campaigns, they are likely be to able to influence other youth through their skills.
There will be high chances for this campaign to be successful.
Learn more at https://brainly.com/question/17199136
Using ADAPT and the ADA as an example, explain how citizens' actions can lead to policy changes in the United States. This portion of the assignment is worth 5 points.
Answer and Explanation:
The "voice" of civil society actors in governance and development programs, work has been more shifted towards citizen participation. There are so many examples where citizens took action to reform the policy of the government. This gives rise to social justice in society. The social movements helped to move people, especially those who are disabled. It leads the movement, which was based on Normalization.
Wolfersberger, a Canadian socialist, believed that people with disabilities should have lived a "normal." On July 5-6, 1978, nineteen disabled activists held a public transit bus "hostage" on Broadway and Colfax in Denver, Colorado. Thus, ADAPT become the nation's first grassroots activist organization for disability rights. In 1990, after the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), ADAPT shifted its vision towards a national system of community-based personal assistance services and ended the segregation between people who were disabled.
The acronym ADAPT become "Americans Disabled for Attendant Programs Today."
Can genocide be justified? Use Just War Theory to explain.
Answer:
No it cannot
Explanation:
The Just War Theory explains that there must be a just cause for a war to begin, almost always a genocide is not started from a just cause, therefore it cannot be justified.
"Person complains of physical illnesses six months or longer, usually four systems affected: pain, gastrointestinal, sexual including erectile dysfunction or irregular menses, and neurological with paralysis or weakness." Select the term that matches the above definition
Answer:
The term that matches the definition is somatization disorder.
Explanation:
A person with somatization disorder complains of recurrent and multiple somatic symptoms. Somatic symptoms are related to psychological factors, which means that, when the person is tested, their results come out normal, not indicating any type of illness. Among the symptoms of somatization disorder there are: headache, fatigue, nausea, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain, pain during sexual intercourse, painful or irregular periods for woman, weakness, and paralysis.
Intelligent agents demonstrate _____, which is the ability to select problems or situations that need attention and act on them.
Answer:
Intelligent agents demonstrate reactivity, which is the ability to select problems or situations that need attention and act on them.
Explanation:
Reactivity can be described as the ability of acting in accordance to a stimulus or a set of stimuli. That means the action was not planned in advance, but surfaces according to the need in context. If a problem occurs, a reactive agent gives it the necessary attention and chooses a course of action to deal with it. Of course, the definition of reactivity can vary according to the field we are working with. When we think of intelligent agents, it is common to think of reactivity, adaptability and mobility.
Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of in-depth interviews? Group of answer choices Interviews may last an hour or more. The interviewer uses a predetermined set of questions. The interviewer uses probing follow-up questions. The objective is for the interviewer to engage the respondent in a conversation. Such interviews require interviewer skills that keep the discussion on topic without unduly constraining the respondent.
Answer: Interviews may last an hour or more.
Explanation:
In-depth interviews are used when the subject being interviewed needs to be understood better. For this reason they are asked questions that aim to find out their true thoughts on a matter instead of what they think they should be their right response.
These interviews may use a predetermined set of questions but there will be extensive usage of follow-up questions with the objective being to engage the respondent in a conversation which is not an easy undertaking which is why interviewer skills that keep the discussion on topic without unduly constraining the respondent are required.
So long as the goals of the interview are accomplished, the duration is irrelevant and so the interview can be done in less than an hour. In-depth interviews therefore do not need to last an hour or more.
Micah has learned to say, "yes sir" and "no sir" when speaking to his grandfather but does not use these phrases when speaking to his brother. This behavior illustrates the concept of ________.
Answer:
Hey there!
This behavior illustrates the concept of pragmatics.
Hope this helps :)
Science differs from other disciplines such as history and arts because science relies on
According to information in the passage, the best way to conduct an argument with someone from a culture that views an argument as a dance would be to:
Answer:
The correct option is B: "calmly respond to the person’s points"
Explanation:
The argument is intended to reason out a certain claim and enlighten the parties involved so, going with options A and D would not be recommended since it does not align with achieving this purpose - it could be counterproductive. Option C would not be wise because the other person might be offended and put off if you go against their core belief and deny that an argument is like a dance.
Response facilitation modeling may occur without conscious awareness. Chartrand and Bargh (1999) found evidence for a _________________, whereby people nonconsciously mimic behaviors and mannerisms of people in their social environments.
Answer: Chameleon Effect
Explanation:
Tanya Chartrand and John Bargh in a study in 1999, found evidence of a social phenomenon known as The Chameleon Effect where people non-consciously mimic behaviors and mannerisms of people in their social environments.
They found that as people interacted with their social partners more, they began to passively and unconsciously mimic such behaviors as their posture, facial expressions and even mannerisms in other to fit in more into that environment. For example, a person talking to another person who has their arms folded might find themselves folding their arms as well without even meaning to do so.
In factitious disorder imposed on self, the individual is ______; in factitious disorder imposed on another, the individual is ______.
Since you didn't post any options to fill in the blanks with - and I wasn't able to find them online-, I will give a detailed answer based on information about this mental illness. This information will most likely help you answer this question.
Answer and Explanation:
In factitious disorder imposed on self, the individual is ______
...faking being sick. People with factitious disorder will try to deceive others into believing they have a physical or even psychological illness. They will, for instance, elevate their body temperature or put blood in their urine. There is no clear reason as to why they feel the need to do this, however.
In factitious disorder imposed on another, the individual is ______
... producing symptoms for someone else. When a person with factitious disorder imposes it on someone else, they will spread false information that that person is sick. The "sick" person is always someone under the care of the person who has factitious disorder.
Although Marcia says she is not prejudiced against African-Americans, she votes against interviewing a job applicant with an African name for a flimsy reason. She is exhibiting what some social science researchers call: %09%09 overt discrimination. %09%09 automatic processing. %09%09 hidden racism. %09%09 modern prejudice.
Answer:
Modern prejudice.
Explanation:
Modern prejudice refers to the modern form of racial discrimination through which, without explicit reference to the personal characteristics of the individual (or even in certain cases, without really feeling that these differences constitute a negative component), certain characteristics are stigmatized non-racial of the person, but that are associated with a certain ethnic group. Thus, for example, modern prejudice ranges from discrimination based on the type of name (names of African origin, Latino surnames, etc.), place of residence, stereotypes, etc.
That is, it is discriminated not by the racial component itself, but by the association that is made of certain details of the individual with a certain race.
Hosea’s ministry began at a time of great economic prosperity for Israel, but that rapidly disintegrated into one of national catastrophe by the end of his ministry. True or False
Answer:
The given statement is "True".
Explanation:
Hosea's warning was mainly for the kingdom of Israel, even though he only originally referred to Judah's Southern principality. His predictions started through Jeroboam 2nd whenever Israel's northwest empire will be at its zenith, but instead lasted until the week before Samaria dropped to Assyria again for another forty decades.Austin feels depressed all the time. He feels worthless, and like nothing he ever does is good enough. His mother takes him to a psychologist who suggests that Austin's problem is based on the poor structuring of his internal processes. The psychologist believes that Austin engages in too much ________________ and _________.
Answer:
"Austin feels depressed all the time..."
The psychologist believes that Austin engages in too much ____introspection______ and __attribution____.
Explanation:
Introspection: This is a situation that explains why Austin engages in inward reflection of his actions and behaviors and condemns himself as worthless. Should he spare some thoughts, he would have realized that he was only a mortal, imperfect, and subject to the vagaries of life. He would have realized that he is not at the centre of the world, but God is. He is paying too much attention to what he does and how he behaves, instead of accepting his limitations as a human being, created for love and to love. He should not spend too much time dwelling on his mistakes. He can take a break and enjoy what life offers him. In this way, he would develop gratitude, which is missing in his current psychological reflections.
Attribution is the process that has enabled Austin to assign causes to his actions and behaviors. This is why he is depressed. Because, he is overdoing it, it has allowed fear to rule his life, instead of faith in God, the Father. He might think that some outside forces are driving his life. He should properly resume control and be in the driver's seat. He should articulate what he wants to achieve in life and pursue his purpose, mindful of the fact that there is a higher power (God), who must be glorified and praised at all times. By changing the way he attributes his actions and behaviors to give thanks instead, Austin's depression will become a thing of past, and it will get to full-blown insanity.
As per the question below is the given answers :
"Austin feels depressed all the time..." The psychologist believes that Austin engages in too much introspection and attribution. Introspection:This is a situation where Austin internally reflects his actions and actions and explains why he considers himself worthless.
If he spared some thought, he would have noticed that he was just human, imperfect, and exposed to the whims of his life.
AttributionIt is the process that allowed Austin to attribute the cause to his actions and actions. That's why he's depressed.
He did it too much, so he could rule his life out of fear rather than believing in God the Father.
Know more:
https://brainly.com/question/14759029?referrer=searchResults
The philosophies of John Locke and Robert Nozick can be said to diverge in which of the following respects: a) Nozick defends strict constraints on what the majority can do whereas Locke defends no constraints. b) Locke derives individual rights from the good of society as a whole, whereas Nozick derives rights from individual self-ownership. c) For Locke, the right to life is inalienable, whereas for Nozick, the right may be surrendered by its possessor. d) Nozick defends a pre-political (natural) right to property whereas Locke does not. e) Locke claims that the purpose of government is to secure rights, whereas Nozick claims that its purpose is to secure wealth.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
e) Locke claims that the purpose of government is to secure rights, whereas Nozick claims that its purpose is to secure wealth.
Explanation:
John Locke and Robert Nozick are two different philosophers who hold different views regarding to humans. For John Locke, he argued that all persons are endowed with natural rights to life, liberty, and property and that rulers who fail to protect those rights may be removed by the people, by force if necessary.
On the other-hand, Robert Nozick believed on the “entitlement” theory of justice which states that the distribution of holdings in a society is just if and only if everyone in that society is entitled to what he has. This is known as entitlement theory of justice.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Little Mark plays with a balloon that pops in his face and frightens him. The next time he sees a balloon, he starts to cry. The type of learning illustrated in this example is called
Answer:
Classical Conditioning
Explanation:
The type of learning illustrated in this example is called Classical Conditioning. This term refers to a unique learning procedure in which two stimuli are repeatedly paired together, which eventually leads to a response that was initially triggered by the second stimulus is now triggered by the first stimuli alone. Which in this case every time Mark plays with a balloon (first stimuli) it pops (second stimuli) which makes him cry. Now Mark cries when he sees a balloon (first stimuli).
You used to earn $76,000 a year in your old job! Suppose you return to college and earn an MBA, after which you get an upper-management position with Yum! Brands. If the tax rates are the same as in 2012 and your starting salary is $125,000, how much will you owe in federal social insurance taxes?
i will owe in federal social insurancemtaxes 203012
You work for an agency and are assigned a client that has Prader-Willi syndrome, but you have never even heard of that disorder. What is the best next step
Answer:
Listen to the patent carefully and if needed Search it on the internet
Explanation:
Prader-Willi syndrome is a disorder that arises due to absence of parental expressed imprinting genes at chromosome. Many people are not diagnosed and misdiagnosed of this disease. It is a complex genetic condition that affects many organs of the body of the patient. This is the condition where patient may experience unusually fair skin and very light colored hairs.
"Among some of the reasons why unmitigated skepticism is difficult for a person to consistently hold as a serious philosophical position is because"
Answer:
It is based on dogmatism.
Explanation:
While Skepticism is a term in philosophy, which is considered as a behavior, or a form of doubt in relation to the truth of a particular thing or situation. It stated that absolute certain knowledge is impossible.
On the other hand, Unmitigated skepticism which is a form of skepticism, claims that categorically and dogmatically it knows that no one knows anything. This appears contradictory and apparently self-defeating.
Hence, among some of the reasons why unmitigated skepticism is difficult for a person to consistently hold as a serious philosophical position is because it dogmatically accept a position or knowledge that no one knows anything, which is self-defeating and contradictory.
It is best for an organization to limit its intensive talent management efforts to its high-potential employees to avoid resentment among the employees.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
False is the Answer.
It is best for an organization to limit its intensive talent management efforts to its high-potential employees to avoid resentment among the employees is false.
The correct option is B.
What is the high potential in talent management?We outline high-ability talent as a worker who is assessed as having the ability, organizational commitment, and motivation to upward thrust to, and succeed in, extra senior positions in the business enterprise. Specific companies can have their personal definitions of high-potential skills, but the essence remains equal.
The purpose of talent control is to become aware of, recruit and hold on to people who pressure the success of your corporation. It is pinnacle precedence, a strategic method for ahead-looking people corporations who understand that their agency performance relies upon their staff.
Learn more about talent management here: https://brainly.com/question/26106218
#SPJ2
Consider the following argument:
Unless you are a star student, you won't graduate from Harvard law. But most folks graduating from Harvard law end up working on the East coast. Thus, most people working on the east coast are stars.
The terms of the argument are:_________.
a) Star student; Graduate of Harvard; East coast
b) Star student; Graduate of Harvard; Working on the East coast
c) Star student; Graduate of Harvard Law; People working on the East coast
Answer:
c) Star student; Graduate of Harvard Law; People working on the East coast.
Explanation:
These items are the terms of the argument. An argument is a series of statements or premises that are intended to analyze another statement (the conclusion). This analysis is usually performed with the purpose of establishing the truth of a proposition. Arguments are essential to areas of learning such as logic and philosophy.
Answer this question
Answer:
The Raute are a very small tribe in Nepal who are recognized in an official capacity as such by the Government. Numbering about an estimated 160 as of 2017, they are quite nomadic and often do not stay in an area for more than a maximum of 5 months. The Nepalese government is attempting to resettle them, by force if necessary which in some cases has been successful but quite a number of them are still resisting.
Their society is primarily built on hunting and gathering. They hunt langur and macaque monkeys as well as other types of bush-meat. They also gather forest produce such as tubers, fruits and vegetables. From interviews conducted, it has been gathered that the Rautes do not want to settle down and farm but rather want to continue gathering as a way of life.
what are the impact of economic on political science
Answer:The influence of economics, the most imperialistic of the social science disciplines, is widely thought to have been felt more decisively in political science than in any other discipline. After briefly reviewing some evidence that this alleged influence is not transmitted through the use of specific economics concepts, this paper explores the possibility that the influence instead stems from the importation of formal rational choice modeling techniques from economics into political science. This is carried out using a case study of an important political science literature on voting behavior and the voter turnout
Explanation:
Consider the positive evaluative adjectives: "Sensible, Well-Educated, Informed, Truth-Seeking, Open-Minded, Persuasive, and Confident." The adjectives in that list typically best apply to which of the following?
a. premises
b. reasons
c. claims/conclusions
d. arguments
e. argument makers
Answer:
The evaluative adjectives best apply to:
e. argument makers.
Explanation:
In the list provided, there are a couple of adjectives that could be used for more than one option. However, when we take the whole list into consideration, it best applies to argument makers. The person making the argument can be sensible, well-educated, informed, truth-seeking, open-minded, persuasive, and confident. Those are all qualities that can be used to describe that person. Just as an example, good adjectives for claims/conclusion would be well-documented, strongly supported, well-argued; and good adjectives for premises would be false, improbable, self-contradictory, fanciful, and fabricated. Notice how different they are from the qualities of an argument maker.
Sherdon really wants to buy a new $40,000 boat, but lacks the funds with which to do so. After spending some amount of time thinking about robbing the local bank, Sherdon casually mentions these thoughts to a friend, Pat. A few weeks later Pat and Sherdon get in a dispute regarding a jointly owned property. In a fit of anger, Pat calls law enforcement and informs on Sherdon for thinking about the bank robbery. The police arrest Sherdon. Which of the following is the most likely result assuming Pat is believed by a judge and jury?
A. Sherdon should be released because he has committed no crime.
B. Sherdon should be found guilty of plotting to commit a felony.
C. Sherdon should be found guily of felony of 'guilt mind.
D. Sherdon should be found guilty of commit conspiracy.
Answer:
Correct answer:
B. Sherdon should be found guilty of plotting to commit a felony.
Explanation:
In the law court, there are two major point upon which most court case are judged - The intent and the action. In the case of Sherdon, for the fact that he had the intent to commit the said robbery despite not doing it is a justifiable point to get him arrested. The judge and the jury would definitely find him guilty of plotting to commit felony if they were to believe Pat statement regarding to Sherdon.
Women are often kept out of prestigious, high paying positions for all the reasons EXCEPT:
a) Males actively aim to keep women out of these jobs.
b) They have been socially grouped with other women making comparable amounts of money.
c) They have historically not held those positions.
Answer:
b) They have been socially grouped with other women making comparable amounts of money.
Explanation:
There are many varying forms of gender discrimination in the workplace but commonly it indicates that workers or job applicants are viewed differently or unfairly due to their sex or gender. The discrimination can come up in any way such as demand for sexual favors, prejudiced in the recruiting process, firing on the basis of gender, passed over for promotion, or unequal because of their gender. Some theories claimed that women were intentionally kept out from the top of the ladder so that they cannot challenge the higher social position of their male counterparts.