Concurrent powers are those that the national and state governments both possess and use. What the Constitution refers to as "Reserved Powers" are those that it neither grants nor denies to the National Government or the States.
What are the Concurrent powers?Powers that the federal government and the state governments both exercise are referred to as concurrent powers. This encompasses the authority to levy taxes, construct roads, and establish inferior courts.The federal government and each constituent political unit, such as a state or province, have the same authority under a federal state's concurrent powers. The same region, the same group of individuals, and the same subject matter are all permissible contexts for the simultaneous use of these authorities. Among the most significant is the power to collect taxes (such as income taxes and property taxes), the right to borrow money on credit, the authority to set up courts under the Supreme Court, the right to eminent domain, and the capacity to define crime and impose punishments.To learn more about Concurrent powers, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/564737
which statements accurately describe the implications of a good samaritan law for a registered nurse? select all that apply. a nurse who provided out of scope care is not protected by the good samaritan law such laws are universally worded so as to minimize differences between jurisdiction. a nurse can be held responsible for a person's injuries if he or she does not intervene. a nurse has a legal responsibility to provide emergency services to be protected, nurses must provide care that is within their legal scope of practice.
The Good Samaritan Law provides legal protection for nurses who provide emergency care.
The following statements accurately describe the implications of a Good Samaritan Law for a registered nurse: a nurse who provided out of scope care is not protected by the Good Samaritan Law, a nurse can be held responsible for a person's injuries if he or she does not intervene, and to be protected, nurses must provide care that is within their legal scope of practice.
The Good Samaritan law is legislation that protects individuals who voluntarily provide emergency aid from being sued for medical malpractice. It provides protection from liability for injuries caused by acts of commission or omission during a declared emergency, provided the healthcare provider acts in good faith.The implications of the Good Samaritan Law for a registered nurse are as follows:a nurse who provided out of scope care is not protected by the Good Samaritan Law.
Learn more about The Good Samaritan Law: brainly.com/question/13160856
#SPJ11
the ideologies of capitalism, socialism, and capitalism rose during which period of change?
The Industrial Revolution, which was sparked by the mechanization of the manufacturing process, gave rise to capitalism and socialism, two major rival economic systems.
What is meant by capitalism?An economic system based on private ownership of the means of production and their use for profit is known as capitalism. Capital accumulation, competitive markets, the pricing system, private property, the recognition of property rights, voluntary exchange, and wage labor are key aspects of capitalism. A common conception of capitalism is as an economic system where individual actors own and control property according to their interests and where supply and demand freely determine market prices in a way that can best serve society. The desire to turn a profit is capitalism's fundamental characteristic. Without a question, capitalism plays a significant role in the modern era's creativity, riches, and success.To learn more about capitalism, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/9267779
the main source of law in the united states which was developed over many generations comes from
Answer:
l think is United States Constitution or the Common law system of English law
Explanation:
We are an organization that strongly supports the 2nd Amendment and we prepare responsible American gun owners to avoid danger, save lives, and keep their loved ones safe. Tell us how our mission resonates with you.
The mission of this organization, which fervently supports the Second Amendment by educating "responsible American gun owners to prevent danger, save lives, and keep their loved ones safe," is timely given that society has recently experienced issues due to the misuse of guns rather than their proper use for defense.
What guarantees does the second amendment provide?The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states that no one's right to keep and bear arms shall be infringed because a well-regulated militia is vital to the security of a free State.
Its objective is to protect an individual's right to own a handgun for non-military uses and to use such a weapon for legal purposes such as self-defense within the home.
How does the organization's mission relate to ours?Despite the fact that the United States Constitution enables individuals to acquire and possess firearms, we do not agree that there are organisations that focus on training citizens to use weapons since we consider that this is a measure that may generate danger in society. Additionally, we think that the state should have the legal ability to use guns to protect its citizens. It should also give them with security.
Learn more about second amendment: https://brainly.com/question/29894002
#SPJ1
Why do you think each state has its own constitution or governing document rather than simply following the rules outlined in the US Constitution?
Answer:
Each state has a constitution to: outline the certain duties of each government within a state, grant rights that go beyond the federal constitution, establishes a system in which the state regulates its finances.
The US constitution sets a basic outline of how we should be governed. While individual state constitutions get into more specific details.
Explanation:
Using this table, calculate the marginal cost of each of these quantities of bikes. The first bike: $ The fourth bike: $ The sixth bike: $ The seventh bike: $
One bike: -$
⇒ 30
Two bikes: $
⇒ 3
Three bikes: $
⇒ 40
Four bikes: $
⇒ 70
Five bikes: $
⇒ 90
Six bikes: $
⇒ 90
Seven bikes: $
⇒ 80
To calculate the marginal cost, we need to find the change in total cost for each additional bike produced. We can do this by finding the difference in total cost between the current quantity and the previous quantity.
Using the provided table, we can calculate the marginal cost of each of the given quantities of bikes:
The marginal cost of the first bike is $30, since it is the only bike and has a total cost of $30.
The marginal cost of the fourth bike is $30, since the total cost of producing four bikes is $100 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27), and the total cost of producing three bikes is $70 ($30 + $3 + $40). Therefore, the marginal cost of producing the fourth bike is $100 - $70 = $30.
The marginal cost of the sixth bike is $20, since the total cost of producing six bikes is $250 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27 + $50 + $100), and the total cost of producing five bikes is $160 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27 + $50). Therefore, the marginal cost of producing the sixth bike is $250 - $160 = $90.
The marginal cost of the seventh bike is $10, since the total cost of producing seven bikes is $330 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27 + $50 + $100 + $80), and the total cost of producing six bikes is $250 ($30 + $3 + $40 + $27 + $50 + $100). Therefore, the marginal cost of producing the seventh bike is $330 - $250 = $80.
So the marginal cost for each quantity of bikes are as follows:
The marginal cost of the first bike: $30
The marginal cost of the fourth bike: $30
The marginal cost of the sixth bike: $20
The marginal cost of the seventh bike: $10
To know more about marginal cost:
https://brainly.com/question/30260452
#SPJ4
Which activist was alive to witness the passing of the 19th amendment?
Answer:
Alice Paul and Elizabeth cady Stanton.
Explanation:
What is the maximum number of years that a person can serve as President of the US?
The amendment limits a president's tenure to 10 years. A person who succeeds in the presidency without an election and holds the position for less than two years is eligible to run for two full terms; otherwise, they are only permitted to hold the position for one elected term.
What is meant by amendment?Essentially a correction is what an amendment is. There are numerous types of it, including the process of changing something through either parliamentary or constitutional procedure. The phrase "modification to the U.S. Constitution" is frequently used in the country. A contract or other legal instrument can be amended to add new clauses or change existing ones. An amendment frequently consists of a tack-on or a fix that largely keeps the original intact tact.The first ten Constitutional Amendments are collectively known as the Bill of Rights. It explains how Americans should interact with their government. Freedom of speech, the press, and religion are just a few of the civil rights and liberties that are guaranteed to the individual.To learn more about the amendment, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/687600
In general, Congress is most willing to defer to the President in
The field of foreign policy is generally where Congress is most likely to defer to the President.
What are the President's duties?The President picks the leaders of federal agencies, including the Cabinet, with the goal of putting into effect and upholding the laws passed by Congress. Also a member of the Executive Branch, the Vice President is prepared to take over as President if necessary.The CEO is the top-ranking official, followed by a president as the next-highest official.In each survey, Abraham Lincoln has received the highest score, followed by George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Theodore Roosevelt, who have always placed in the top five. James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, and Franklin Pierce have had the lowest scores throughout all four surveys.To learn more about the President's duties, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29638611
5. CHAPTER 8 (5 points)
Discuss the concept of discretion in the criminal justice system, especially as it pertains to
police officers and judges. How much discretion should these professionals be awarded?
When offered too much, do you think police officers have a tendency to abuse such
discretion? Can judges impose sentences that are more fair if they can use their discretion
instead of relying on sentencing guidelines?
Discretion is a necessary component of the criminal justice system, but it must be balanced with accountability and oversight to prevent abuse and ensure fair outcomes.
What is the concept of discretion in criminal justice system?Discretion in the criminal justice system refers to the power given to law enforcement officers and judges to make decisions based on their own judgment and interpretation of the law in specific situations. Police officers and judges have different forms of discretion, and their exercise of discretion can have a significant impact on the outcome of criminal cases.
Police officers have a considerable amount of discretion in their daily activities, including deciding whether or not to make an arrest, issue a citation, use force, or conduct a search. However, the level of discretion they are granted depends on the laws and policies of the jurisdiction they serve. Some police departments may have strict guidelines that limit the use of discretion, while others may have more flexible policies that allow officers to use their judgment.
When offered too much discretion, some police officers may abuse their power, leading to unjust outcomes in the criminal justice system. For example, an officer may unfairly target certain groups of individuals or use excessive force, which can result in harm and even loss of life. Therefore, it is essential to balance the need for discretion with accountability and oversight to ensure that officers act lawfully and justly.
Judges also have a significant amount of discretion in criminal cases, particularly when it comes to sentencing. While there are often sentencing guidelines that judges must follow, they can still use their discretion to adjust sentences based on the specific circumstances of the case, such as the defendant's criminal history, the severity of the crime, and the impact on the victim. In some cases, this discretion can lead to more fair and just outcomes than following strict guidelines, as judges can consider the unique circumstances of each case and the individuals involved.
In conclusion, discretion is a vital component of the criminal justice system, allowing law enforcement officers and judges to make informed decisions based on their judgment and interpretation of the law. However, it is essential to balance discretion with accountability and oversight to prevent abuse and ensure that decisions are made in a fair and just manner. Judges should be granted discretion to impose sentences that consider the individual circumstances of the case to ensure that justice is served in each situation.
Learn more on criminal justice system here;
https://brainly.com/question/5111667
#SPJ1
One of the hosts of the video claims that the trickiest weather condition you'll encounter is ___________ .
The trickiest weather condition that an individual may encounter is an adverse weather conditions in which this type of weather produces effects that makes an individual to find it difficult to go out or see, examples of this is when there are conditions such as snow, ice, rain or fog.
The question is asking about the trickiest weather conditions according to a host in a video. This generally refers to unpredictable and severe weather like tornadoes, hurricanes or blizzards.
Explanation:The subject of the question is related to weather conditions, which typically falls under Geography. The tricky part of this question is that it does not provide more specific details about the host's claim but in general, hosts often refer to severe and unpredictable weather conditions like tornadoes, hurricanes or blizzards as the trickiest weather conditions. These conditions can be tricky because of the high level of unpredictability and the rapid changes that can occur.
Learn more about trickiest weather conditions here:https://brainly.com/question/32509576
#SPJ2
___________makes it easier for employees to win discrimination lawsuits
There are several factors that can make it easier for employees to win discrimination lawsuits, but one of the most important is evidence.
Evidence can take many forms, including documentation of discriminatory actions, witness testimony, and statistical data that shows patterns of discrimination. When employees have strong evidence to support their claims of discrimination, they are more likely to be successful in court. Additionally, having a clear and comprehensive anti-discrimination policy in place can also strengthen an employee's case. This policy can serve as evidence that the employer was aware of the discriminatory behavior and failed to take appropriate action to prevent it. Overall, having solid evidence and a strong anti-discrimination policy can significantly increase the likelihood of success in a discrimination lawsuit.
To know more about lawsuits click here:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
Gary owned Gary's Pawn Shop. He contracted with Skip Security, whereby Skip Security agreed to provide an unarmed security officer at the Pawn Shop every night from 6:00 pm -11:00 pm. Last Saturday at 8:00 pm, Aaron was a customer who was robbed and beaten in the Pawn Shop’s parking lot. Aaron sued Skip Security, alleging that Skip Security breached its duty to protect him.
In this scenario, Aaron may have a valid claim against Skip Security for breaching its duty to protect him.
Although Skip Security agreed to provide an unarmed security officer at Gary's Pawn Shop every night from 6:00 pm-11:00 pm, the fact that Aaron was robbed and beaten in the parking lot suggests that the security measures provided were inadequate. The duty to protect customers extends beyond just providing a security officer; it also includes conducting regular security assessments and implementing appropriate security measures to prevent harm to customers. If Aaron can demonstrate that Skip Security failed to fulfill this duty, he may be able to recover damages for his injuries. However, it is important to note that the specific facts of the case and the terms of the contract between Gary's Pawn Shop and Skip Security will determine the ultimate outcome of the lawsuit.
To learn more about Aaron click the link below:
brainly.com/question/13448916
#SPJ1
what was a unique qualification about ronald reagan’s presidential candidacy compared to others who preceded him?
Unique limitation of Ronald Reagan's presidential run was that he was an actor.
Political figure and the 40th President of the United States, Ronald Reagan. He was among the most influential conservatives of the modern era. Ronald stood out from the other presidential nominees because he had previously worked as an actor. This made him unique among those vying for the same position.
According to President Reagan, 60% of Americans who at the time believed that their defense spending was insufficient vowed to rebuild the nation's military power. Reagan also pledged to put an end to "trustworthy government" and to implement supply-side economic policies in order to revive the economy.
More jobs and tax revenue result from policies that promote growth in the production of goods and services. Reagan supported a balanced budget, supply-side economic policies, and higher defense spending. Democratic discontent with Carter, the Iranian hostage situation, and a faltering domestic economy characterized by stagflation all helped his campaign.
Learn more about Ronald Reagan at:
brainly.com/question/2352947
#SPJ4
what is the official retirement age, according to the us government? a) 67. b) 68. c) 69. d) 70.
The official retirement age, according to the US government, is a) 67.
What is the official retiement age ?This refers to the age at which individuals are eligible to receive full Social Security retirement benefits.
While individuals may choose to begin receiving benefits as early as age 62, their monthly benefit amount will be reduced if they choose to do so before reaching full retirement age. Conversely, if individuals choose to delay their retirement beyond full retirement age, their monthly benefit amount may be increased.
Find out more on retirement age at https://brainly.com/question/30331927
#SPJ1
according to article 7 of the nar code of ethics, which of these statements is most accurate when accepting compensation from parties to a transaction?
Article 7 of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Code of Ethics states that real estate agents must disclose to their clients any financial benefits they receive from the transaction.
This includes compensation from both the buyer and the seller, as well as any referral fees or compensation from other parties. The disclosure must be made in a timely and complete manner, and the agent must obtain the client's informed consent before accepting any compensation. This helps to ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest, as clients are able to make fully informed decisions about their transactions with all relevant information disclosed to them by their agent.
To know more about National Association of Realtors click here:
brainly.com/question/31226349
#SPJ4
Who was involved in the Loving vs Virginia?
Two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man was involved in the Loving vs Virginia.
Mildred Jeter, a black woman from Virginia, wed Richard Loving, a white man, in the District of Columbia in 1958. Soon after, the Lovings went back to Virginia. Following that, the couple was accused of breaking the state's anti-miscegenation law, which outlawed inter-racial unions.
In a unanimous 9-0 decision in the Lovings' favor on June 12, 1967, the Supreme Court overturned their criminal convictions and invalidated Virginia's anti-miscegenation law. Chief justice Earl Warren penned the opinion for the court, and all of the justices concurred.
A unanimous Supreme Court overturned state laws that forbade interracial unions, ruling that these anti-miscegenation laws were in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Learn more about Loving vs Virginia at:
brainly.com/question/28957766
#SPJ4
What are the three basic common characteristics of state constitution ?
What is an example of a situation in which the government could use prior restraint against the press?The number of people who died of the flu in the United States in 2018A story criticizing the military effort in IraqPublication of photos that demonstrate where troops are assembling during World War IIAn op-ed criticizing the Speaker of the House's new social justice initiatives2.If a public official wanted to prove libel against the press, he or she would have to show what?That the information had accused them of wrongdoingThat the information was obsceneThat the information was false, damaging, and "made with actual malice"That the information was damaging to reputation
An example of a situation in which the government could use prior restraint against the press is the publication of classified information that would compromise national security or endanger the lives of individuals.
For instance, if a news outlet obtained information about ongoing military operations that, if published, could put soldiers or civilians at risk, the government may seek a court order to prevent the publication of the information. This would be an example of prior restraint, in which the government seeks to prevent the press from publishing information before it is released. If a public official wanted to prove libel against the press, he or she would have to show that the information was false, damaging, and "made with actual malice." This means that the official would have to prove that the information was not true, that it caused harm to their reputation, and that the publisher knew that the information was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Additionally, public officials must show that the information was not protected by the First Amendment's guarantees of freedom of speech and of the press.
To know more about publication click here:
brainly.com/question/31178571
#SPJ4
(T/F) products liability laws that cover individuals who are injured by a product may take the form of state common law or state statutes.
The stated statement is untrue since product liability laws, often known as laws that protect people damaged by-products, can be either state common law or state legislation.
What is meant by legislation?The act or outcome of a legislature, parliament, or other comparable governing body creating, ratifying, or promulgating laws is known as legislation. A piece of legislation may first be referred to as a bill before it is passed into law. While it is still being considered, it may also be referred to generally as "legislation" to set it apart from other activity. Many different things can be accomplished with legislation, including regulating, authorizing, outlawing, providing (funds), sanctioning, granting, declaring, and restricting. An administrative or executive entity acting in accordance with a legislative act may compare it to a non-legislative act. The term "legislation" is a generic one that refers to both laws made by individuals or organizations with the permission of the Parliament as well as laws passed by parliaments.To learn more about legislation, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
which was a direct political change that resulted from the industrial revolution?
The Reform Bill of 1832 was a significant political turning point brought on by the Industrial Revolution. A movement to increase the representation of the populace in Parliament was launched in November 1830 by the Whig party's leader, an aristocrat named Charles, Lord Grey (1764–1845).
What is meant by industrial revolution?The Industrial Revolution, which took place between roughly 1760 and about 1820–1840, was the adoption of new manufacturing techniques in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States. The world as we knew it underwent a profound transformation with each of these three technological advances: the steam engine, the era of science and mass production, and the rise of digital technology.An agrarian economy gave way to an industrial economy during the Industrial Revolution, where machines as well as humans were used to produce goods. As a result, there was an uptick in output and efficiency, as well as a decrease in prices, an increase in available commodities, higher earnings, and a migration of people from rural to urban regions.To learn more about industrial revolution, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14240244
a tree in connie’s yard fell during the last storm and damaged her neighbor’s car. connie did not have insurance that covered this type of accident and has not paid the neighbor for the damage. the neighbor has decided to sue connie in court. which type of lawsuit would this be?
This would be a civil lawsuit for property damage.
The neighbor is seeking compensation from Connie for the damage to their car that was caused by the fallen tree on Connie's property. The neighbor would need to prove that Connie was negligent in maintaining her property and that this negligence led to the damage to the car. The outcome of the lawsuit will depend on the evidence presented by both parties and the decision of the judge or jury.
Since Connie did not have insurance that covered this type of accident, she may be held personally responsible for the damages caused. The neighbor would need to provide evidence of the damage caused and the cost of repairs in order to successfully pursue this type of lawsuit.
To know more about lawsuit click here:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
India is blessed with a vibrant wildlife and ecosystem, which is often subject to
indiscriminate exploitation by unscrupulous elements of society including business organizations. Briefly explain any 5 (five) legislations that are related to environment protection or conservation
The financial responsibility law can be satisfied with _________________.
answer choices
Medical insurance
Collision insurance
Comprehensive insurance
Liability insurance
Answer:
Liability insurance.
if a man enters surgery to have his left leg amputated and leaves surgery with his right leg amputated, which latin term of law applies?
Answer:
res ipsa loquitur
Explanation:
The latin term that applies in this case is "res ipsa loquitur," which translates to "the thing speaks for itself." This legal principle applies when the facts of a case are so clear and obvious that negligence can be inferred without the need for further evidence. In this case, the fact that the wrong leg was amputated speaks for itself and suggests that there was negligence on the part of the medical staff.
In Latin law, the term that applies if a man enters surgery to have his left leg amputated and leaves surgery with his right leg amputated is "res ipsa loquitur."
Res ipsa loquitur is a legal term used in tort law, meaning "the thing speaks for itself." It is a doctrine that shifts the burden of proof in negligence cases, where the facts and circumstances of the case infer that the negligence caused the injury or harm sustained.The concept of res ipsa loquitur presumes that the defendant, through his or her conduct, had exclusive control over the situation and that the injury that occurred would not have happened without the defendant's negligence. The rule of res ipsa loquitur will apply where the evidence and circumstances of the case establish negligence, which is the cause of injury. In conclusion, the latin term of law that applies if a man enters surgery to have his left leg amputated and leaves surgery with his right leg amputated is "res ipsa loquitur."
To learn more about surgery, visit: https://brainly.com/question/15688506
#SPJ11
Ethics in workplace between Employer and Employee
When making ethical decisions on behalf of your employer, should you consider the impact those decisions may have on others outside your employer? If so, who and why?
Then consider ‘what if’ decisions made by your employer conflicted with your own morals and ethics. What would you do? What should you do? Explain why and provide real life examples if you have ever experienced this type of conflict.
Absolutely, an ethical choice made by the employer should take into account how it will affect all parties involved, including the community, suppliers, and customers.
What choices do stakeholders make in an ethical manner?Stakeholder-based ethical decision-making offers a framework for assessing the available options or alternatives. Prior to making a decision, this strategy also calls for a knowledge of the potential effects on all of the stakeholders.
What effect does work ethics have on both employers and employees?A company that implements a workplace ethics programme aligns employee behaviour. This encourages transparency, collaboration, and trust as a result. Also, workers perform better at their professions when they are aware of the expectations of their superiors.
To know more about ethical visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ1
This sign means:
+
Another road crosses yours
Side road ahead on the right
Another lane is merging with yours
This sign is warning you of an upcoming intersection or side road ahead on the right. It may also indicate that another lane is merging with yours.
What is intersection?Intersection is the point at which two or more paths, lines, roads, or other objects cross each other. It is the point at which the two objects meet. Intersections are often highly regulated, with rules and regulations governing who has the right-of-way, how fast or slow traffic must move and even instructions on how to safely turn onto the intersecting road. Intersections are often used in transportation networks and in urban and suburban planning. They are also used in mathematics and other fields to illustrate relationships between objects or concepts. Intersections are important in ensuring safe travel and a well-coordinated flow of traffic.
To learn more about intersection
https://brainly.com/question/30454062
#SPJ1
First, for an action against Rough & Tough, she would have to show that the company had no right to transfer her pawned property without her written consent. Illinois Pawnbrokers Act, 205 Ill. Comp. Stat. 510/10 (2017). If pledged property was transferred without written consent of the property owner, the pawnbroker can be held responsible for loss or theft of pawned property because the property was in his safekeeping and was transferred illegally. Jacobs v. Grossman, 141 N.E. 714, 716 (Ill. App. Ct. 1923).
is it a issue, rule, Application or conclusion?
Further justification for the applicability of the legal principle is provided by the citation to Jacobs v. Grossman. As a result, the passage includes both a legal principle and how it is applied.
How can you tell if a rule of law is being applied?The first section outlines the law, which states that in order to file a lawsuit against Rough & Tough, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the business lacked the legal authority to transfer her pawned item without her express written agreement. The next phrases provide an application of that legal principle, stating that the pawnbroker can be held accountable for any later loss or theft of the property if it was truly transferred without the owner's express consent.
To learn more about legal issues visit:
brainly.com/question/13603534
#SPJ1
equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
This clause guarantees equal protection under the law for all citizens, regardless of race, gender, religion, or other factors. It also prohibits states from denying certain fundamental rights and privileges to certain classes of people. This is an important component of the American civil rights system.
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is a crucial part of the US Constitution that protects people's rights to equal protection under the law regardless of their background. This clause was added to the Constitution in 1868 and has been used in several landmark Supreme Court cases to strike down discriminatory laws and policies.
Section 1- All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
To know more about Equal Protection Clause, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30190596#
#SPJ11
What are subcommittees responsible for?
Subcommittees are smaller groups of members of a legislative body, such as a committee in the United States Congress. Subcommittees are responsible for reviewing and conducting hearings on specific issues related to the larger committee's jurisdiction.
They are also responsible for developing legislation and making recommendations to the larger committee for consideration. Subcommittees provide a more focused and specialized approach to legislative work, allowing for more in-depth analysis and discussion of particular issues. Subcommittees often include members with expertise or interest in the specific issue being considered, and their work helps to inform the larger legislative process by providing detailed information and recommendations to the full committee.
To know more about Subcommittees click here:
brainly.com/question/9528412
#SPJ4