Find the expected value of the winnings
from a game that has the following payout
probability distribution:
Payout ($) -1 1
3
5
7
Probability 0.70 0.15 0.10 0.04 0.01
Expected Value = [?
Round to the nearest hundredth.
Enter

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

The left side 0.3 is less than the right side 0.8, which means that the given statement is always true.

Using the Poisson distribution formula as in part (i), we can calculate P(X=10 and 150 bikes arrived within an hour) and P(150 bikes arrived within an hour) independently.

(i) The probability that 20 red bikes arrive within an hour can be calculated using the Poisson distribution formula. Let X be the number of red bikes arriving within an hour, which follows a Poisson distribution with a rate of 200 * 0.05 = 10 bikes per hour (since 5% of the bikes are red). Therefore, the probability P(X=20) can be calculated as:

P(X=20) =  (e^{(-λ)} * λ²⁰) / 20!, where λ is the rate, which is 10 in this case.

Plugging in the values, we get:

P(X=20) = (e⁽⁻¹⁰⁾ * 10²⁰) / 20! ≈ 0.117

(ii) The probability that 20 red bikes arrive within the first hour and 500 bikes (of any color) arrive within the first three hours can be calculated as the product of the probabilities of these two events occurring independently.

Using the same approach as in part (i), the probability P(X=20) is 0.117.

Let Y be the number of bikes (of any color) arriving within three hours, which follows a Poisson distribution with a rate of 200 * 3 = 600 bikes. Therefore, the probability P(Y=500) can be calculated as:

P(Y=500) = (e^{(-λ)} * λ⁵⁰⁰⁰) / 500!, where λ is the rate, which is 600 in this case.

Plugging in the values, we get:

P(Y=500) = (e⁽⁻⁶⁰⁰⁰⁾ * 600⁽⁻⁵⁰⁰⁾) / 500! ≈ 0 (approximately zero, as the rate is high).

So, the probability that 20 red bikes arrive within the first hour and 500 bikes (of any color) arrive within the first three hours is approximately zero, as the event of 500 bikes arriving within three hours is highly unlikely.

(iii) Given that 20 red bikes arrived within an hour, the expected total number of bikes that arrived within this hour can be calculated as the sum of the expected number of red bikes and the expected number of bikes of other colors.

The expected number of red bikes is simply the rate of red bikes, which is 10 bikes per hour.

The expected number of bikes of other colors can be calculated by subtracting the expected number of red bikes from the total rate, which is 200 bikes per hour:

Expected number of bikes of other colors = 200 - 10 = 190 bikes per hour.

So, the expected total number of bikes that arrived within this hour is 10 + 190 = 200 bikes.

(iv) Given that 150 bikes arrived within an hour, we can use the concept of conditional probability to calculate the probability that exactly 10 out of them were red. Let X be the number of red bikes arriving within an hour, which follows a Poisson distribution with a rate of 10 bikes per hour (since 5% of the bikes are red). Therefore, the conditional probability P(X=10 | 150 bikes arrived within an hour) can be calculated as:

P(X=10 | 150 bikes arrived within an hour) = P(X=10 and 150 bikes arrived within an hour) / P(150 bikes arrived within an hour)

Using the Poisson distribution formula as in part (i), we can calculate P(X=10 and 150 bikes arrived within an hour) and P(150 bikes arrived within an hour) independently.

For P(X=10 and 150 bikes arrived within an hour), we can use the Poisson distribution formula with a rate of 10 bikes and a time interval of 1 hour:

To know more about Poisson distribution refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17280826

#SPJ11

The statement that consists a relation between cosine angle or trigonometric angle relations, [tex]cos(65°) = \sqrt {(1+cos(130°))/2}[/tex] is true statement. So, option(A) is right one.

We have to verify the relationship

[tex]cos(65°) = \sqrt {(1+cos(130°))/2}[/tex].

Now, using the cosine angles formula, cos( 2A) = cos² A - sin²A --(1)

where A represents the measure of angle. As we know, sin² A = 1 - cos² A (trigonometric identity)

from equation (1), cos( 2A) = cos² A - (1 - cos² A) = cos²A - 1 + cos²A

= 2 cos² A - 1

=> 2 cos² A = 1 + cos(2A)

=> [tex]cos²A = \frac{ 1 + cos(2A)}{2} [/tex]

=> [tex]cos( A) = \sqrt {\frac{ 1 + cos(2A)}{2} }[/tex]

Now, if A = 65° then 2A = 130° then substitute these values into the above formula, [tex]cos (65°) = \sqrt {\frac{ 1 + cos(130°)}{2} }[/tex]

Which is the required relation. Hence, it is true statement.

For more information about cosine angle, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28160425

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The statement cos(65 degrees) = sqrt 1+cos(130 degrees)/2 is

A) true

B) False

12.497 square units is the  area a of the triangle whose sides have the given lengths.

To find the area (a) of a triangle given the lengths of its three sides (a, b, and c)

we can use Heron's formula, which is:

a =√s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)

where s is the semi perimeter of the triangle, which is half the perimeter, and is given by:

s = (a + b + c) / 2

Using the values of a = 7, b = 5, and c = 5, we can calculate the semi perimeter as:

s = (a + b + c) / 2

= (7 + 5 + 5) / 2

= 8.5

Now we can use Heron's formula to find the area:

a =√s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c))

= √8.5(8.5-7)(8.5-5)(8.5-5)) = 12.497

To learn more on Triangles click:

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ4

The fastest possible algorithm to search for the player with the highest score in a listing of 5,000 players could be to use a sorting algorithm like quicksort or mergesort to sort the list in descending order based totally on the players' scores, after which simply return the first player inside the sorted list, which would have the highest score.

The time complexity of quicksort and mergesort algorithms is O(n log n), this means that they can sort a listing of 5,000 players exceptionally fast. once the listing is sorted, finding the player with the highest score is a constant time operation, as it absolutely involves returning the first player in the listing.

Consequently, using a sorting algorithm to sort the listing in descending order and returning the first participant would be the quickest possible set of rules to look for the player with the highest rating in a list of 5,000 players.

Learn more about quicksort:-

https://brainly.com/question/17143249

#SPJ4

The probability of selecting the red marble on the fourth draw is 1/10.

We have,

The probability of selecting the red marble on the first draw is 1/10, as there is only one red marble among ten total marbles in the bag.

If the red marble is not selected on the first draw, it is set aside and not put back into the bag for the subsequent draws.

Thus, on the second draw, there are 9 marbles left in the bag, only one of which is red.

So the probability of selecting the red marble on the second draw is 1/9.

Similarly, if the red marble is not selected on the first and second draws, it is set aside and not put back into the bag for the subsequent draws.

Thus, on the third draw, there are 8 marbles left in the bag, only one of which is red. So the probability of selecting the red marble on the third draw is 1/8.

Finally, if the red marble is not selected on the first three draws, it is set aside and not put back into the bag for the subsequent draws.

Thus, on the fourth draw, there are 7 marbles left in the bag, only one of which is red.

So the probability of selecting the red marble on the fourth draw is 1/7.

Since each draw is independent, we can multiply the probabilities of each individual event to find the probability of selecting the red marble on the fourth draw:

P(selecting red on fourth draw) = P(not red on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd draws) x P(selecting red on 4th draw)

= (9/10) x (8/9) x (7/8) x (1/7)

= 1/10

Therefore,

The probability of selecting the red marble on the fourth draw is 1/10.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/14099682

#SPJ1

To calculate the number of pizza combinations available at the shop, we need to multiply the number of options for each category. 16 toppings x 3 crusts x 2 cheese options = 96 possible pizza combinations. Therefore, there are 96 different pizza options available at the shop.

To calculate the total number of pizza combinations available at the shop, you'll want to use the multiplication principle. This states that you can find the total number of possible combinations by multiplying the number of options for each variable.
In this case, you have:
- 16 different toppings
- 3 types of crust
- 2 different cheese options
To calculate the total number of combinations, simply multiply these values together:
16 toppings * 3 crusts * 2 cheeses = 96 possible pizza combinations
So, there are 96 different pizza combinations available at the shop.

Learn more aboutcombinations here: brainly.com/question/31596715

#SPJ11

Answer:

The measurements of the angles are 30, 60 and 90 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

I assume the question should read "the measures of the ANGLES of the triangle are in the ratio 2:4:6.

If the angles are in the proportion 2:4:6, the measures of the angles have the same scale factor x. And, the sum of the measures of the angles of a triangle is 180

2x+4x+6x=180

12x=180

12x/12=180/12

x=15

The measures of the angles are:

2x=2(15)=30

4x=4(15)=60

6x=6(15)=90

Answer: I'm not sure how to explain math too well, so I'm sorry if this answer isn't helpful enough.

Step-by-step explanation:

1 mile = 63,360 inches

So, you would substitute 3,059,000 miles instead of 1 mile. Then, you would multiply that number by 63,360 inches.

3,059,000 miles = 193,818,240,000 inches.

Answer:

1 solution

Step-by-step explanation:

refer to the image above

If the boxplot for one set of data is much wider than the boxplot for a second set of data, Option d, "none of the above need to be true" is the correct answer.

The width of a boxplot is determined by the range of the data, as well as the spread of the data within the interquartile range (IQR). A wider boxplot indicates a greater range and/or more spread in the data.

However, the mean and median are measures of central tendency that describe where the "middle" of the data is located. The spread of the data does not necessarily provide any information about the mean or median.

Therefore, right answer is option d "none of the above need to be true". As the width of the boxplot alone cannot tell us anything about the means or medians of the two sets of data, nor can it tell us whether one set of data contains outliers.

We need to examine additional measures, such as the mean and median, to make any conclusions about the data.

Learn more about data sets

brainly.com/question/22210584

#SPJ11

The solution to the equation e^7-4x = 6 is: x = (1/4)(7-ln(6)), the solution to the equation ln(3x - 10) = 2 is x = (12/3).

(a) First, we can simplify the equation to e^7 = 6 + 4x. Then, dividing both sides by 4 and taking the natural logarithm, we get ln(e^7/4) = ln(6/4 + x), which simplifies to x = (1/4)(7-ln(6)).

(b) To solve for x, we first exponentiate both sides to eliminate the logarithm, which gives us 3x - 10 = e^2. Solving for x, we get x = (12/3).

(a) The solution to the equation ln(x^2 - 1) = 3 is x = sqrt(e^3 + 1) or x = -sqrt(e^3 + 1).

(b) The solution to the equation e^2x - 3e^x + 2 = 0 is x = ln(2) or x = ln(1/2).

(a) First, we exponentiate both sides to eliminate the logarithm, which gives us x^2 - 1 = e^3. Then, we solve for x, which gives us x = sqrt(e^3 + 1) or x = -sqrt(e^3 + 1).

(b) We can factor the equation as (e^x - 1)(e^x - 2) = 0, which gives us e^x = 1 or e^x = 2. Solving for x, we get x = ln(2) or x = ln(1/2).

(a) The solution to the equation 2^x-5 = 3 is x = 5 + log_2(3).

(b) The solution to the equation ln x + ln(x - 1) = 1 is x = (1 + sqrt(5))/2 or x = (1 - sqrt(5))/2.

(a) First, we can rewrite the equation as 2^x = 8, which gives us x = 5 + log_2(3).

(b) We can combine the logarithms using the logarithmic identity ln(xy) = ln(x) + ln(y), which gives us ln(x(x-1)) = 1. Then, we can exponentiate both sides to eliminate the logarithm, which gives us x(x-1) = e. Solving for x using the quadratic formula, we get x = (1 + sqrt(5))/2 or x = (1 - sqrt(5))/2.

(a) The solution to the equation ln(ln x) = 1 is x = e^e.

(b) The solution to the equation e^ax = Ce^bx, where a ≠ b, is x = C/(e^(b-a)).

(a) First, we exponentiate both sides to eliminate the logarithm, which gives us ln x = e. Then, we exponentiate both sides again, which gives us x = e^e.

(b) Dividing both sides by e^bx, we get e^(ax-bx) = C. Then, we solve for x, which gives us x = C/(e^(b-a)).

(a) The solution to the inequality ln a < 0 is 0 < a < 1.

(b) The solution to the inequality e^x >

To know more about equation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19283860#

#SPJ11

The linear approximation for S(2.75, 2.1) is approximately 7.9 times the area of a circle with radius 2.1.

(a) The surface area of the can can be divided into three parts: the top lid, the bottom lid, and the lateral surface.

The area of each lid is a circle with radius r, so the combined area of the two lids is 2πr^2. The lateral surface area is a rectangle with width 2πr (the circumference of the circle) and height h, so its area is 2πrh. Therefore, the total surface area is:

S(h, r) = 2πr^2 + 2πrh

(b) To calculate S(3,2), we plug in h=3 and r=2:

S(3,2) = 2π(2)^2 + 2π(2)(3) = 4π + 6π = 10π

To calculate Sr(3,2), we take the partial derivative of S with respect to r and evaluate at h=3 and r=2:

Sr(h,r) = 4πr + 2πh

Sr(3,2) = 4π(2) + 2π(3) = 8π + 6π = 14π

To calculate Sh(3,2), we take the partial derivative of S with respect to h and evaluate at h=3 and r=2:

Sh(h,r) = 2πr

Sh(3,2) = 2π(2) = 4π

(c) The linear approximation for S(2.75, 2.1) is:

S(2.75, 2.1) ≈ S(3,2) + Sr(3,2)(2.75-3) + Sh(3,2)(2.1-2)

We already calculated S(3,2), Sr(3,2), and Sh(3,2) in part (b), so we plug in the values:

S(2.75, 2.1) ≈ 10π + 14π(-0.25) + 4π(0.1) = 10π - 3.5π + 0.4π = 7.9π

Therefore, the linear approximation for S(2.75, 2.1) is approximately 7.9 times the area of a circle with radius 2.1.

To learn more about radius, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/13449316

#SPJ11

Answer:

....................21 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

I took it

Dr. Anderson and her team used a systematic method of observation to quantify the number of interruptions made by kindergartners during a 1-hour lesson. To manage the observation period, the team used a cyclical approach of observing for 1 minute, taking a 1-minute break, and then repeating the cycle.

This allowed the team to stay focused during the observation period and prevent fatigue or observer bias. The team likely used a tally sheet or another method of recording data to keep track of the number of interruptions during each 1-minute observation cycle. This helped them to accurately quantify the data and draw conclusions based on their observations.
Dr. Anderson and her team used a systematic observation method to quantify the number of times kindergartners interrupt their teacher during a 1-hour lesson. They employed a cyclical approach where they observed for 1 minute, took 1 minute off, and then repeated this cycle throughout the entire lesson. This method allowed the team to effectively manage the observational period and gather data on the kindergartners' behavior.

To learn more about observation :  brainly.com/question/31715625

#SPJ11

The average rate of change of the function in this table is given as follows:

1.

The average rate of change of a function is given by the change in the output of the function divided by the change in the input of the function.

For this problem, we have that when the input x increases by one, the output y also increases by one, hence the average rate of change of the function in this table is given as follows:

1.

More can be learned about the average rate of change of a function at brainly.com/question/11627203

#SPJ1

Answer: 4/5 i think sorry if i am wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportions of students consuming protein-rich food in 2000 and 2010 is (-0.105, -0.035).

To construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportions of students who were consuming protein-rich food in 2000 and 2010, we can use the formula:

( p1 - p2 ) ± zα/2 * sqrt( p1(1-p1)/n1 + p2(1-p2)/n2 )

where:

p1 and p2 are the sample proportions of students consuming protein-rich food in 2000 and 2010, respectively.

n1 and n2 are the sample sizes of the two years.

zα/2 is the critical value of the standard normal distribution corresponding to a 95% confidence level, which is 1.96.

Using the given data, we have:

p1 = 0.75, n1 = 700

p2 = 0.82, n2 = 850

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

(0.75 - 0.82) ± 1.96 * sqrt( 0.75(1-0.75)/700 + 0.82(1-0.82)/850 )

Simplifying, we get:

-0.07 ± 0.035

Rounded to three decimal places, the lower bound is -0.105 and the upper bound is -0.035.

For similar question on population proportions :

https://brainly.com/question/15087042

#SPJ11

We need to further decompose the second relation into two relations - one with {c->e} and another with {d->a}. This results in three relations that are in 3NF: (ab, c, d), (c, d, e), and (d, a).

To find the closures for the given functional dependencies, we start with the individual attributes and add all possible attributes that are functionally dependent on them. For example, the closure of {a} would be {a, d} since we have the dependency d -> a. Similarly, the closure of {ab} would be {ab, c, d, e}. We can continue this process for all the attributes and their combinations to get the closures.

For normalization, we need to first check if the relation is in 1NF. Since there are no repeating groups or composite attributes, it is already in 1NF. Next, we check for partial dependencies to see if it is in 2NF. Here, we can see that the attribute c determines the attributes d and e, but c is not a candidate key. Therefore, we need to decompose the relation into two relations - one with the dependencies {ab->c, c->d} and another with {c->e, d->a}.

Finally, we check for transitive dependencies to see if it is in 3NF. Here, we can see that the attribute d determines the attribute a in the second relation.

For more about decompose:

https://brainly.com/question/28896356

#SPJ11

Two different possible values for height h and radius r for the cones that can hold 9 pi cubic inches of popcorn are h=3.08 inches, r=3.08 inch and h=2.55 inches, r= 5.11 inches.

The formula for the volume of a cone is V = (1/3)πr²h, where r is the radius and h is the height of the cone.

If we assume the height and radius are equal, then

(1/3)πr²h = 9

(1/3)πr³ = 9

πr³ = 27

r³ = 27/π

r ≈ 3.08

h ≈ 3.08

Other way, we can assume the height is twice the radius, then

(1/3)πr²h = 9

(1/3)πr²(2r) = 9

(2/3)πr³ = 9

πr³ = 27/2

r³ = (27/2)/π

r ≈ 2.55

h ≈ 5.11

Therefore, two different possible values for height and radius are: (3.08, 3.08) and (2.55, 5.11).

To know more about volume of a cone:

https://brainly.com/question/1984638

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex] log_{2}(32) = log_{2}( {2}^{5} ) = 5[/tex]

[tex] log_{5}(5) = 1[/tex]

[tex] log_{3}(1) = 0[/tex]

The answer is 0.

Answer:

If we let "x" be the number of skits in Colby's video, then we can set up the following equation based on the information given:

5 minutes (for the introduction) + 8 minutes per skit (for "x" number of skits) = 181 minutes

Simplifying this equation, we get:

5 + 8x = 181

Subtracting 5 from both sides, we have:

8x = 176

Dividing both sides by 8, we get:

x = 22

Therefore, there are 22 skits in Colby's video. Answer: 22.

a) The volume of the region E bounded by the paraboloid is 56π

b)  The centroid of E is (0,0, 32/3)

What is paraboloid?

In geometry, a paraboloid is described as a quadric surface which has exactly one axis of symmetry and no center of symmetry. The term "paraboloid" is derived from the term parabola which is a part of conic section.

a) Given that,

the region E bounded by the paraboloids z = x² + y² and z = 28 − 6x² − 6y²

Here we will use the  polar coordinates.

At first in the xy plane we locate the bounds on (r, ∅)

The x and y coordinate in the solid region must lie in the disk which is of radius 2.

So, 0≤r≤2 and 0≤∅≤2π

Let, x= r cos∅ and y= r sin∅

where sin²∅ + cos²∅ = 1

Therefore the above paraboloid becomes

z= r²

and z= 28- 6r²

To find the surface now we subtract r² (lower surface) from that of

28- 6r²(upper surface)

we get, 28- 7r²

and integrate the expression over r and ∅ with the limits 0≤r≤2 and 0≤∅≤2π,

∫∫(28-7r²)r dr d∅ -----(1)

= ∫∫ (28r- 7r³) dr d∅

now integrating for r at first we get,

[tex]14r^{2} - 7\frac{r^{4} }{4}[/tex]

Putting the limit for r we get,

56-28

= 28

Now from (1) we get,

∫ 28 d∅

integrating we get,

28∅

Putting the limit for ∅ we get,

56π

Hence, the volume of the region bounded by the paraboloid is 56π.

b) Here both curve is symmetric about x-axis and y - axis.

So, the x- coordinate and y-coordinate of the centroid is zero.

The z coordinate of centroid is given by,

Let c be the centroid of z-axis

c= (1/v)∫∫∫ z dv where v denotes the volume

= (1/2v) ∫∫((28-6r²)² - (r²)²) rdr d∅----- (2)

Multiplying the integration part we get,

=784r-336r³+ 35r⁵

here the limits of r is 0≤r≤2 and 0≤∅≤2π

At first taking integration for r we get,

(392r² - 84r⁴+ (35/6)r⁶)

Putting the limits for r we get,

1568-1344+ (1120/3)

= 1792/3

Now integrating for ∅ we get,

1792∅/3

Taking limit for ∅ we get,

3584π/ 3

Now from equation (2)

(1/(2×56π)×((1792×2π)/3)

= 32/3

Hence, the centroid is (0,0, 32/3)

To know more about paraboloid

https://brainly.com/question/30634603

#SPJ4

The test that could be used to determine whether the proportions of service requests in the town differ from national proportions is option D, chi-square goodness-of-fit test.

The chi-square goodness-of-fit test is used to determine if the observed frequencies of a categorical variable differ from the expected frequencies. In this case, the categorical variable is the service category and the expected frequencies are the national proportions of service requests.

The null hypothesis is that the observed frequencies in the town are not different from the expected frequencies based on national proportions. The alternative hypothesis is that the observed frequencies are different.

To conduct the test, we calculate the expected frequencies based on the national proportions and compare them to the observed frequencies in the town using a chi-square test statistic.

If the calculated chi-square value exceeds the critical value from the chi-square distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the number of categories minus one, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the observed frequencies are significantly different from the national proportions.

For more questions like Null hypothesis click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

As regards whether the conditions for inference are met, the answer is A. No. The random condition is not met.

Certain conditions must be met in order to carry out a legitimate statistical inference. In this case, the Normal/Large Counts criterion is not met. This criterion requires that the difference sampling distribution be substantially normal or that the sample size be large enough to invoke the Central Limit Theorem.

With only 20 participants, the sample size is considered small, making it difficult to determine that the distribution of deviations is normal. As a result, the credibility of any conclusions drawn from this study would be limited.

Find out more on conditions at https://brainly.com/question/30771569

#SPJ1

In order to determine if the process of claims processing in the medical insurance company is in control, we need to use statistical process control (SPC). One commonly used tool for this is the control chart.

A control chart is a graph of the data collected over time, with control limits representing the range of variation that is considered acceptable. To create a control chart for this situation, we need to calculate the proportion of claims mailed late for each sample and plot them over time. We can then calculate the average proportion and the control limits, which are typically set at three standard deviations above and below the average. If the data falls within the control limits and there are no other patterns or trends, then we can conclude that the process is in control. Using the data provided, we can calculate the average proportion of claims mailed late to be 0.1536, and the control limits to be 0.0427 and 0.2644. Plotting the data on a control chart shows that the data points mostly fall within the control limits, with some variation but no major trends or patterns. Therefore, we can conclude that the process of claims processing in the medical insurance company is in control, meaning that the claims department is meeting its policy of processing all claims received within five days.

Learn more about statistical process control here

https://brainly.com/question/30508092

#SPJ11

The volume of the inscribed cylinder in the given prism is 128π/3 cubic units, with a radius of

[tex]4* \sqrt{} (3)[/tex]

units and a height of 8 units.

The volume of the inscribed cylinder in the given prism is 128π/3 cubic units. To find the volume of the inscribed cylinder, we need to first determine the radius and height of the cylinder. Since the cylinder is inscribed in the prism, its height will be equal to the height of the prism, which is 8 units.

To find the radius, we need to consider the cross-section of the prism and the inscribed cylinder. Since the bases of the prism are equilateral triangles of side length 8, the cross-section of the prism is also an equilateral triangle of side length 8.

The inscribed cylinder touches the prism along the three edges of this equilateral triangle. Therefore, the radius of the inscribed cylinder is equal to the height of the equilateral triangle, which can be found using the Pythagorean theorem as:

[tex] \sqrt{} (8^2 - (8/2)^2) [/tex]

=

[tex]4* \sqrt{} (3)[/tex]

Hence, the volume of the inscribed cylinder is given by the formula: Volume =

[tex]π(radius)^2(height)[/tex]

=

[tex]π(4*sqrt(3))^2(8)[/tex]

= 128π/3 cubic units.

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ4

The charge on the capacitor for t > 0 is q(t) = (7/2)e^(-t/4)cos((3/4)t) + (35/6)e^(-t/4)sin((3/4)t) - (40/13)sin(2t) + (40/39)cos(2t).

The charge on the capacitor for t > 0 in an RLC series circuit with a voltage source E(t), a resistor of R ohms, an inductor of L henrys, and a capacitor of C farads, with initial current i(0) and initial charge q(0), is given by the solution to the differential equation q''(t) + (R/L)q'(t) + (1/LC)q(t) = E(t)/L with initial conditions q(0) = q(0) and q'(0) = i(0)/C.

In this case, we have E(t) = 40cos(2t), R = 2 ohms, L = 1/4 henrys, and C = 1/13 farads. We also have initial current i(0) = 0 and initial charge q(0) = 7/2 coulombs.

Using the characteristic equation of the differential equation, we find that the roots are complex conjugates with a real part of -R/2L = -1/4 and an imaginary part of sqrt((1/LC)-(R/2L)^2) = 3/4. Thus, the general solution is of the form q(t) = Ae^(-t/4)cos((3/4)t) + Be^(-t/4)sin((3/4)t).

Using the initial conditions, we can solve for A and B to get q(t) = (7/2)e^(-t/4)cos((3/4)t) + (35/6)e^(-t/4)sin((3/4)t) - (40/13)sin(2t) + (40/39)cos(2t).

Therefore, the charge on the capacitor for t > 0 is q(t) = (7/2)e^(-t/4)cos((3/4)t) + (35/6)e^(-t/4)sin((3/4)t) - (40/13)sin(2t) + (40/39)cos(2t).

To know more about capacitor, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30761204#

#SPJ11

The man does 14,400 ft-lbs of work against gravity while climbing to the top of the helical staircase. A 160-lb man carrying a 20-lb can of paint climbs a helical staircase around a silo with a radius of 20 ft. The silo is 40 ft high, and the man makes two complete revolutions.

To calculate the work done by the man against gravity, we first need to determine the total vertical distance he climbs.

The height gained in one revolution can be found using the Pythagorean theorem. The man moves along the circumference of the circle with radius 20 ft, so the horizontal distance in one revolution is 2 * π * 20 = 40π ft. Thus, the helical path forms a right-angled triangle, with the height gained as one side, 40π ft as the other side, and the helical path's length as the hypotenuse. If the man makes two complete revolutions, the total horizontal distance traveled is 80π ft.

Let h be the height gained in one revolution. Then, h² + (40π)² = (80π)². Solving for h, we find that h = 40 ft. Since there are two revolutions, the total height gained is 80 ft.

The man's total weight (including the paint can) is 160 + 20 = 180 lbs. Work done against gravity is the product of force, distance, and the cosine of the angle between the force and displacement vectors. In this case, the angle is 0° since the force and displacement are in the same direction (vertically). So, the work done is:

Work = (180 lbs) * (80 ft) * cos(0°) = 180 * 80 * 1 = 14,400 ft-lbs.

Therefore, the man does 14,400 ft-lbs of work against gravity while climbing to the top of the helical staircase.

Learn more about vertical distance here: brainly.com/question/28907336

#SPJ11