a plastic ball fully submerged in water is tied to the bottom of the container using a string as shown. if the volume of the plastic ball is 60 cm3 and its density is 507 kg/m3, find the tension, in newton, in the string? density of water is 1000 kg/m3.

There are two resonance structures for XeO3.

When we draw the Lewis structure for XeO3, we see that there are three oxygen atoms bonded to the central xenon atom. Each oxygen atom has two lone pairs of electrons. The xenon atom has two lone pairs of electrons and one double bond with one of the oxygen atoms.

To determine the number of resonance structures, we need to check if there are any possible arrangements of the electrons that can be made without changing the connectivity of the atoms. In the case of XeO3, we can draw one additional resonance structure by moving the double bond from the xenon atom to one of the oxygen atoms. This results in the xenon atom having three lone pairs of electrons and one single bond with each of the oxygen atoms.

To know more about XeO3:

https://brainly.com/question/15721295

#SPJ11

In an experiment to measure the wavelength of light using a double slit, it is found that the fringes are too close together toeasily count them. To spread out the fringe pattern, one could: B) double the slit separation.

Increasing the slit separation will cause the interference pattern to spread out, making it easier to observe and measure individual fringes. The fringe spacing is inversely proportional to the slit separation, so when the slit separation is doubled, the fringe spacing will also increase, making the fringes more distinguishable.

On the contrary, halving the slit separation (option A) would cause the fringes to become even closer. Options C and D, changing the width of each slit, will affect the intensity and sharpness of the fringes, but not their spacing. Therefore, the most appropriate choice to spread out the fringe pattern and make it easier to measure the wavelength of light is option B) double the slit separation.

Learn more about fringe spacing here:

https://brainly.com/question/17212031

#SPJ11

The kinetic energy of an object is directly proportional to the square of its velocity. Therefore, if the velocity of an object traveling with velocity v is k, then its kinetic energy will be 4k when its velocity becomes 2v.
Hi! When the velocity of an object doubles from v to 2v, its kinetic energy will change accordingly. The formula for kinetic energy (KE) is:
KE = 1/2 * m * v^2

where m is the mass of the object, and v is its velocity.
If the initial kinetic energy is k when the velocity is v, then:
k = 1/2 * m * v^2
When the velocity becomes 2v:

New KE = 1/2 * m * (2v)^2 = 1/2 * m * 4v^2 = 2 * (1/2 * m * v^2) = 2k

So, the new kinetic energy of the object when its velocity becomes 2v is twice its initial kinetic energy, or 2k.

To know more about kinetic energy visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/26405082

#SPJ11

The minimum wave amplitude that will make the ant become momentarily weightless is A = (mgl/2f)^(1/2), where g is the acceleration due to gravity.

To solve for this, we need to find the amplitude of the wave that will cause the tension in the rope at the ant's position to drop to zero. When the tension is zero, the ant will be weightless for an instant.

At the point of zero tension, the rope must be at its maximum displacement, which is equal to half the amplitude of the wave. The force on the rope due to gravity is mg, and the force due to tension is f. Therefore, at the point of zero tension, mg = f/2.

Using the wave equation v = sqrt(f/μ), where v is the wave velocity and μ is the mass per unit length of the rope, we can express the tension in terms of the amplitude of the wave: f = 4μ(gl/π^2)A^2.

Substituting f into the equation for zero tension and solving for A, we get A = (mgl/2f)^(1/2) = (π^2m/8μ)^(1/4) * l^(1/4) * g^(1/4).

Know more about wave amplitude here:

https://brainly.com/question/17003906

#SPJ11

If a disk rolls smoothly across a floor, the velocity of the point at the top of the disk b) equal to the velocity of the center of the disk because the point at the top of the disk is moving with a velocity that is equal to the velocity of the center of the disk.

This is due to the fact that the rolling motion of the disk involves both translational motion (the motion of the center of mass of the disk) and rotational motion (the motion of the disk about its center).

In a smooth rolling motion, these two motions are coupled in such a way that the point at the top of the disk moves with the same velocity as the center of mass of the disk.

This can be understood by considering that the point at the top of the disk is moving with the translational velocity of the center of mass of the disk and with an additional rotational velocity that cancels out the relative motion between the disk and the point at the top of the disk.

Therefore, the velocity of the point at the top of the disk is equal to the velocity of the center of the disk when the disk is rolling smoothly across a floor. Hence, option b is correct.

To learn more about velocity, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ11

Answer:

this answer is true

Explanation:

To find the time when the particle achieves its maximum positive acceleration, we need to look at the slope of the height vs. time curve. This slope represents the velocity of the particle.

At the point where the particle achieves its maximum positive acceleration, it must be at the maximum displacement from its equilibrium position. This occurs at the top of the curve (the peak).

At the peak of the curve, the slope is zero (the particle momentarily stops before changing direction). Therefore, the maximum positive acceleration occurs halfway between the maximum displacement and the equilibrium position.

Looking at the graph, we can see that the maximum displacement occurs at t = 1 second and the equilibrium position occurs at t = 1.5 seconds. Therefore, the time when the particle achieves its maximum positive acceleration is halfway between these two times:  t = (1 + 1.5) / 2 = 1.25 seconds.

So, the answer is that the particle achieves its maximum positive acceleration at t = 1.25 seconds.

To know more about acceleration, refer

https://brainly.com/question/460763

#SPJ11

The movement described in the question is known as toe walking. Toe walking is a gait abnormality where the individual walks on the balls of their feet or the toes, rather than using their heels to touch the ground first. It is a common behavior seen in children, especially in their early stages of walking, but it usually resolves on its own without any treatment.

However, in some cases, toe walking may persist and can cause various complications such as muscle tightness, tendon shortening, and difficulties in balance and coordination.

Toe walking can be a sign of an underlying neurological condition, such as cerebral palsy or autism, or it can be caused by tightness in the calf muscles, a short Achilles tendon, or structural problems in the feet. Treatment options include physical therapy, stretching exercises, orthotics, and in rare cases, surgery. Early intervention is essential to prevent any long-term complications associated with toe walking.

In summary, toe walking is a common movement observed in children, but it can indicate underlying medical conditions that require attention. If you notice persistent toe walking in your child, it is best to seek medical advice to ensure timely intervention and treatment.

you know more about  movement described pls visit-

https://brainly.com/question/31198073

#SPJ11

(D) is correct option. Both of the beams have the same intensity

The correct statement is (D) Both of the beams have the same intensity

Intensity (I) is defined as power (P) per unit area (A) of the beam:

[tex]I = P/A[/tex]

Since both lasers produce 2 mW beams, their powers are equal (P_A = P_B = 2 mW). However, the cross-sectional area of beam B is twice that of beam A (A_B = 2*A_A).

The correct statement is d: Both of the beams have the same intensity. This is because intensity is power per unit area, and since beam B has twice the cross-sectional area of beam A, its intensity is half that of beam A.

Therefore, the intensity of both beams is the same, despite their different beam widths.

Learn more about  Beams

brainly.com/question/4218151

#SPJ11

Answer:

Using more boiling water is LEAST likely to help

Explanation:

Using less room-temp. water in the styro cup (as long as the piece of metal is fully immersed) is helpful because less volume of water would heat up quicker and the ΔT would be greater.

Using more metal is helpful because more heat will transfer to the water and make it easier to measure the temperature increase.

Using more boiling water will not make the metal piece get any higher than the boiling point of water, so this is not helpful, plus it would take longer to boil a greater volume water, thus slowing down the experiment.

A more sensitive thermometer is helpful because it would improve the precision of the measurements.

The total average power output of the Sun is approximately 3.828e26 watts. The intensity of sunlight incident on Mercury is approximately 9087 W/m².

(a) To calculate the total average power output of the Sun (P), we can use the formula for the intensity (I) of an isotropic source:

I = P / (4 * π * r²)

where I is the intensity, P is the power output, and r is the distance from the source. The intensity at Earth's upper atmosphere is 1310 W/m², and the distance from the Sun to Earth (r) is approximately 1.496e11 meters (1 Astronomical Unit).

We can rearrange the formula to find the power output (P):

P = I * (4 * π * r²)

P = 1310 W/m² * (4 * π * (1.496e11 m)²)
P ≈ 3.828e26 W

The total average power output of the Sun is approximately 3.828e26 watts.

(b) To find the intensity of sunlight incident on Mercury, we can use the same formula with the distance between Mercury and the Sun (5.9e10 m):

I_Mercury = P / (4 * π * r_Mercury²)

I_Mercury = 3.828e26 W / (4 * π * (5.9e10 m)²)
I_Mercury ≈ 9087 W/m²

The intensity of sunlight incident on Mercury is approximately 9087 W/m².

More on power: https://brainly.com/question/30519200

#SPJ11

The power dissipated by the 6 kohm resistor may now be calculated using the power formula: P = I2 * R = (5.33 mA)2 * 6 kohm = 0.18 mW. Therefore, d. 2.67 mW is the right response.

To find the power dissipated by a resistor in a circuit, we need to use the formula P = I^2 * R, where P is power in watts, I is current in amperes, and R is resistance in ohms.

In this circuit, the 6 kohm resistor is in series with a 4 kohm resistor and a 12 kohm resistor, and the current flowing through the circuit is 6 mA. To find the current flowing through the 6 kohm resistor, we need to use Ohm's law, which states that V = I * R, where V is voltage in volts. The voltage across the 4 kohm resistor is 4 mA * 4 kohm = 16 V, and the voltage across the 12 kohm resistor is 4 mA * 12 kohm = 48 V. Therefore, the voltage across the 6 kohm resistor is 48 V - 16 V = 32 V. Using Ohm's law again, we can find the current flowing through the 6 kohm resistor to be I = V / R = 32 V / 6 kohm = 5.33 mA.

Now we can use the power formula to find the power dissipated by the 6 kohm resistor: P = I^2 * R = (5.33 mA)^2 * 6 kohm = 0.18 mW. Therefore, the correct answer is d. 2.67 mW (rounded to two significant figures).

To know more about power click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30150415

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we need to use the principle of buoyancy. The buoyant force acting on the board is equal to the weight of the water displaced by the board.

The weight of the water displaced by the board is given by:

W_water = V_board * rho_water * g

where V_board is the volume of the board above the water, rho_water is the density of water, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

The weight of the board is given by:

W_board = V_board * rho_board * g

where rho_board is the density of the board.

Since the board is floating, the buoyant force is equal to the weight of the board:

W_buoyant = W_board

Therefore, we have:

V_board * rho_board * g = V_board * rho_water * g

Simplifying this equation, we get:

V_board / V_total = rho_board / rho_water

where V_total is the total volume of the board.

Substituting the given values, we get:

V_board / (20.0 cm * 5.00 cm * 3.00 m) = 350 kg/m^3 / 1000 kg/m^3

Solving for V_board, we get:

V_board = 0.0105 m^3

The volume of the board above the water is given by:

V_above = V_board - V_submerged

where V_submerged is the volume of the board submerged in water.

The submerged volume can be calculated from the dimensions of the board and the depth to which it is submerged:

V_submerged = (20.0 cm) * (5.00 cm) * (depth)

We can solve for the depth by using the fact that the buoyant force is equal to the weight of the water displaced by the submerged part of the board:

W_buoyant = V_submerged * rho_water * g

W_buoyant = (20.0 cm) * (5.00 cm) * (depth) * rho_water * g

W_buoyant = (20.0 cm) * (5.00 cm) * (depth) * (1000 kg/m^3) * (9.81 m/s^2)

W_buoyant = 0.981 * depth * N

where N is the newtons.

The weight of the board is given by:

W_board = V_board * rho_board * g

W_board = (0.0105 m^3) * (350 kg/m^3) * (9.81 m/s^2)

W_board = 0.340 N

Since the board is partially submerged, the buoyant force is less than the weight of the board:

W_buoyant < W_board

Therefore, we have:

0.981 * depth * N < 0.340 N

Solving for depth, we get:

depth < 0.347 m

The volume of the board above the water is therefore:

V_above = V_board - V_submerged

V_above = (0.0105 m^3) - (20.0 cm) * (5.00 cm) * (0.347 m)

V_above = 0.00524 m^3

The fraction of the volume of the board above the surface of the water is:

V_above / V_total = 0.00524 m^3 / (20.0 cm * 5.00 cm * 3.00 m)

V_above / V_total = 0.0175

Therefore, approximately 1.75% of the volume of the board is above the surface of the water.

Learn more about Density here:- brainly.com/question/1354972

#SPJ11

Answer:

If electrons were made to vibrate at a frequency of a few million billion hertz (also known as terahertz frequency), the waves emitted would belong to the electromagnetic spectrum's terahertz range. These waves have wavelengths ranging from around 1 millimeter to 30 micrometers, making them shorter than radio waves but longer than infrared radiation. Terahertz waves have unique properties that make them useful in various applications such as medical imaging, security scanning, and wireless communications.

Explanation:

Answer:

Step 1: A pulley, if frictionless, can produce only the same amount of work as the work done upon it, therefore it cannot increase the work.

Explanation:

Therefore option(a) is rejected, being incorrect.

Step 2:  A pulley can keep the work of resistance unchanged but cannot change it.

Explanation:

Therefore option(b) is also rejected, being incorrect.

Step 3: A pulley cannot be used to multiply the effort force,

Explanation:

Therefore option(c) is rejected as well, being incorrect.

Step 4:  The function of a pulley is to change the direction of the force.

Explanation:

Therefore option(d) is the correct option for this question.

Explanation:

E = 0.5832 mJ

The answer is not among the options provided.

The energy stored in a capacitor is given by the formula:

E = (1/2) * C * V^2

where E is the energy, C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage across the capacitor.

In this case, we want to find the energy stored in C2, so we need to calculate the voltage across C2. We can do this using the formula for capacitors in series:

1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3

Substituting the given values, we get:

1/C = 1/15 µF + 1/10 µF + 1/20 µF

1/C = 1/6 µF

C = 6 µF

Now we can calculate the total charge stored on the capacitors:

Q = C * V0

Q = 6 µF * 18 V

Q = 108 µC

Since the capacitors are in series, the charge on each capacitor is the same:

Q = C1 * V1 = C2 * V2 = C3 * V3

We can solve for V2:

V2 = Q/C2

V2 = (108 µC) / (10 µF)

V2 = 10.8 V

Finally, we can calculate the energy stored in C2:

E = (1/2) * C2 * V2^2

E = (1/2) * (10 µF) * (10.8 V)^2

E = 0.5832 mJ

Therefore, the answer is not among the options provided.

To learn more about voltage, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/29445057

#SPJ11

The  index of refraction of the unknown substance is approximately 2.22.

The index of refraction of the unknown substance can be found using Snell's law, which relates the angle of incidence, angle of refraction, and indices of refraction of two media:

n₁sinθ₁ = n₂sinθ₂

where n₁ is the index of refraction of the first medium (1.33 in this case), θ₁ is the angle of incidence (13.0°), n₂ is the index of refraction of the unknown substance (what we want to find), and θ₂ is the angle of refraction (78.0°).

Rearranging the equation to solve for n₂, we get:

n₂ = n₁(sinθ₁/sinθ₂)

Plugging in the given values, we get:

n₂ = 1.33(sin13.0°/sin78.0°)

n₂ ≈ 2.22

Therefore, the index of refraction of the unknown substance is approximately 2.22.

Visit to know more about Refraction:-

brainly.com/question/27932095

#SPJ11

The model must contain identical striped patterns on either side of the central slit in order to accurately depict the spreading ocean.

Since the stripes indicate the repeating pattern of a magnetic field, they must be similar on both sides of the strip.

One of the earliest human designs to be envisioned is the striped pattern. It was used in the Middle Ages to designate those who were outcasts and from whom it was best to keep one's distance.

Invisible magnetic "stripes" of normal and reversed polarity, like those depicted in the picture below, were found in the sea floor as a result of these scans. The patterns show how oceanic crust formed and spread over the mid-oceanic ridges.

To know about pattern

https://brainly.com/question/30065043

#SPJ4

(a) Based on Faraday's law of induction, the magnitude of the induced emf in a closed loop is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop. Since the current in the loop is clockwise,

the magnetic field produced by the induced current opposes the external magnetic field (Lenz's law). Therefore, the rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop is decreasing with time. This means that the external magnetic field must be decreasing with time as well, in order to induce the clockwise current. Therefore, the correct answer is "It is decreasing with time."

(b) We can use Faraday's law of induction to relate the rate of change of magnetic flux to the induced emf and the number of turns in the loop:

emf = - N dΦ/dt

where emf is the induced emf, N is the number of turns in the loop, and dΦ/dt is the rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop. Since the loop is circular, we can express the magnetic flux through the loop in terms of the magnetic field and the area:

Φ = B A

where B is the magnetic field and A is the area of the loop. The area of a circle is given by A = π r^2, where r is the radius of the loop. Therefore, we have:

dΦ/dt = d(B A)/dt = A dB/dt

Substituting this into Faraday's law and solving for dB/dt, we get:

dB/dt = - emf / (N A)

We are given the resistance R and current I in the loop, so we can use Ohm's law to relate the induced emf to the current:

emf = I R

Substituting this into the above equation, we get:

dB/dt = - I R / (N A)

Substituting the given values, we get:

dB/dt = - (2.20 × 10^-3 A) × (0.500 Ω) / [(1 turn) × (π × (0.0940 m)^2)]

dB/dt = - 39.6 mT/s

Therefore, the rate at which the magnetic field is decreasing with time is 39.6 mT/s.

(c) The induced electric field can be calculated using the formula:

E = emf / L

where emf is the induced emf, and L is the length of the path over which the emf is measured. In this case, the induced emf is the same as in part (b), and the length of the path can be taken to be the circumference of the loop:

L = 2 π r

Substituting the given values, we get:

E = (2.20 × 10^-3 V) / (2 π × 0.0940 m)

E = 1.19 V/m

Therefore, the magnitude of the induced electric field at a distance from the center of the loop is 1.19 V/m.

Learn more about   current    here:

https://brainly.com/question/13076734

#SPJ11

The suitcase is dragged for 7.03 m before it is riding smoothly on the belt.

First, we need to find the initial velocity of the suitcase in the horizontal direction, which is zero. Then, we can use the work-energy principle to find the work done on the suitcase by the friction force:

where m = 9.50 kg, vi = 0 m/s, vf = 1.80 m/s.

The work done by the friction force is:

where μk = 0.210, g = 9.81 m/s².

Setting these two equations equal to each other and solving for d, we get:

where μs = 0.470.

Plugging in the values, we get:

To learn more about work done, here

https://brainly.com/question/31655489

#SPJ4

The suitcase is dragged for a distance of 8.29 meters before it begins to move smoothly on the conveyor belt.

What is Distance?

Distance is the numerical measurement of the amount of space between two points, typically measured in units such as meters, kilometers, miles, or feet. It is a scalar quantity that only specifies the magnitude of the space between two points and does not consider direction or displacement.

The force of friction acts to oppose the motion of the suitcase, and so the net force on the suitcase is given by:

Fnet = mg - μmg = (1 - μ)mg

Using Newton's second law, Fnet = ma, we can find the acceleration of the suitcase:

a = Fnet/m = (1 - μ)g ≈ 3.23 m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]

The time it takes for the suitcase to reach a velocity of 1.80 m/s can be found using the kinematic equation:

v = u + at

where u is the initial velocity, which is zero.

Solving for t, we get:

t = v/a ≈ 0.56 s

The distance the suitcase is dragged before it reaches a velocity of 1.80 m/s is given by:

s = ut + (1/2)[tex]at^{2}[/tex]

where u is the initial velocity, which is zero.

Substituting the values we have found, we get:

s = (1/2)[tex]at^{2}[/tex] ≈ 8.29 m

To know more about Distance visit;

https://brainly.com/question/26550516

#SPJ4

Answer:A change in the ball's velocity can change its momentum. Momentum is defined as the product of an object's mass and its velocity, so any change in the velocity of the soccer ball will result in a change in its momentum. This change can be caused by various factors, such as a kick or a collision with another object.

The size of the soccer field, air temperature, and the number of players on the field are unlikely to directly affect the momentum of the soccer ball. However, these factors can indirectly affect the game and potentially lead to changes in the ball's velocity or direction of motion, which can in turn affect its momentum. For example, a change in air temperature can affect the air resistance acting on the ball, which can alter its trajectory and speed. Similarly, the number of players on the field can affect the available space and opportunities for the ball to be kicked or redirected.

Explanation:

The intensity of the electromagnetic wave produced by a light source at a given distance is inversely proportional to the square of the electric and magnetic fields, and is not directly affected by the speed of light.

Statement 1 is true. The intensity of the wave is inversely proportional to the square of the fields. This is because the Poynting vector is proportional to the cross-product of the electric and magnetic fields, and the energy flux density is proportional to the square of the fields.

Statement 2 is false. The intensity of the wave is not proportional to the square of the fields, but rather inversely proportional to the square of the fields.

Statement 3 is false. The intensity of the wave is not proportional to the speed of light. While the speed of light is a fundamental constant that affects the propagation of the wave, it does not directly impact the intensity of the wave.

Statement 4 is false. The intensity of the wave is not inversely proportional to the speed of light. Again, while the speed of light affects the propagation of the wave, it does not directly impact the intensity of the wave.

For more such questions on electromagnetic

https://brainly.com/question/24319848

#SPJ11

This is an interesting scenario! When a cube is balanced with one edge in contact with a table top and with its center of gravity directly above the edge, it is said to be in a state of unstable equilibrium. This means that even a slight disturbance could cause the cube to fall over.

To understand this concept, it is important to first understand what center of gravity means. The center of gravity is the point where the weight of an object is evenly distributed in all directions. In a cube, this point is located at the geometric center of the cube.

Now, in the scenario described, the cube is resting on one of its edges. This edge is acting as a pivot point or fulcrum. When the cube is in this position, its center of gravity is located directly above the pivot point. This means that the weight of the cube is evenly distributed on either side of the pivot point.

However, since the cube is in a state of unstable equilibrium, any slight disturbance could cause the weight distribution to shift. For example, if the table were to vibrate or if there were a gust of wind, the weight distribution could shift slightly, causing the cube to fall over.

When a cube is balanced with one edge in contact with a table top and with its center of gravity directly above the edge, it is in a state of unstable equilibrium. This means that even a slight disturbance could cause the cube to fall over.

To know more about center of gravity, refer

https://brainly.com/question/24553858

#SPJ11

At the level of the cloud tops, the rotational speed of a point on Jupiter's equator is approximately 12.57 km/s.

To calculate the rotational speed of a point on Jupiter's equator at the level of the cloud tops, we'll need to use the following terms and information:

1. Jupiter's equatorial radius: 71,492 km
2. Jupiter's rotational period: 9.925 hours

Now, let's follow these steps:

Convert Jupiter's rotational period from hours to seconds.
9.925 hours * 3600 seconds/hour = 35,730 seconds

Calculate the circumference of Jupiter at the equator.
C = 2 * π * radius
C = 2 * π * 71,492 km
C ≈ 449,197 km

Calculate the rotational speed (in km/s) of a point on Jupiter's equator.
Rotational speed = Circumference / Rotational period
Rotational speed = 449,197 km / 35,730 seconds
Rotational speed ≈ 12.57 km/s

So, the rotational speed of a point on Jupiter's equator at the level of the cloud tops is approximately 12.57 km/s.

More on rotational speed: https://brainly.com/question/28692116

#SPJ11

The buoyant force exerted by the water on the sphere can be calculated using Archimedes' principle, which states that the buoyant force is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object. In this case, the fluid is freshwater, which has a density of 1000 kg/m³.

(a) To calculate the buoyant force, we first find the weight of the displaced water:
Weight of displaced water = Density x Volume x Gravitational acceleration
Weight of displaced water = 1000 kg/m³ x 0.300 m³ x 9.81 m/s² = 2943 N
The buoyant force exerted by the water on the sphere is 2943 N.
(b) The tension in the cable is 900 N, which is the net force acting on the sphere. The net force is the difference between the buoyant force and the weight of the sphere. Thus, we can calculate the weight of the sphere:
Weight of sphere = Buoyant force - Tension = 2943 N - 900 N = 2043 N
To find the mass of the sphere, we use the formula:
Mass = Weight / Gravitational acceleration = 2043 N / 9.81 m/s² ≈ 208.3 kg
The mass of the sphere is approximately 208.3 kg.
(c) When the cable breaks and the sphere rises to the surface, it comes to rest, meaning the buoyant force and weight of the sphere are equal. Since the sphere's volume remains constant, the fraction of its volume submerged is equal to the ratio of its weight to the buoyant force:
Fraction submerged = Weight of sphere / Buoyant force = 2043 N / 2943 N ≈ 0.694
When the sphere comes to rest, approximately 69.4% of its volume will be submerged.

learn more about density here

https://brainly.com/question/14870637

#SPJ11

The amperage is 208.3 A. To calculate, we multiply the power by the inverse of power factor (0.8) and divide by the voltage: (20,000 sf * 15 W/sf) / (240 V * 0.8) = 208.3 A.

To calculate the amperage for a building, we first need to determine the power consumption. Assuming 15 watts per square foot, we can multiply the square footage (20,000) by the power per square foot to get a total power consumption of 300,000 watts. Next, we need to consider the power factor, which is the ratio of real power (watts) to apparent power (volt-amperes). Assuming a power factor of 0.8, we can multiply the total power consumption by the inverse of the power factor (1/0.8) to get the apparent power, which is 375,000 volt-amperes. Finally, we can use Ohm's Law (P = IV) to calculate the amperage. Assuming a single phase, 240 volt service, we can divide the apparent power (375,000 VA) by the voltage (240 V) to get the amperage, which is 1,562.5 amps. However, this is the apparent current, so we need to divide by the power factor (0.8) to get the real current, which is 1,953.1 amps. Rounding to the nearest tenth, we get 208.3 .

Learn more about amperage here;

https://brainly.com/question/29085928

#SPJ11

All of these types of filters are used extensively in electronic circuits and communication systems to manipulate the frequency content of signals.

Frequency-selective devices categorized as low-pass, high-pass, bandpass, and band rejection are all types of electronic filters.

Electronic filters are circuits that allow certain frequency components of an electrical signal to pass through while attenuating (reducing) others. They can be classified based on the frequencies that they allow to pass through, as well as their response to signals above and below a certain cutoff frequency.

Low-pass filters allow frequencies below a certain cutoff frequency to pass through, while attenuating higher frequencies. High-pass filters, on the other hand, allow frequencies above a certain cutoff frequency to pass through, while attenuating lower frequencies.

Bandpass filters, as the name suggests, allow a certain band of frequencies to pass through, while attenuating frequencies outside of this band. Band rejection filters (also known as notch filters) attenuate a certain band of frequencies, while allowing frequencies outside of this band to pass through.

All of these types of filters are used extensively in electronic circuits and communication systems to manipulate the frequency content of signals.

Learn more about categorization

brainly.com/question/14583272

#SPJ11

Answer: The force between the charges is reduced to half.

Explanation:

We know that

F = product of the charges/square of the distance between them

i.e. F = q1 q2 / r^2

If one charge is doubled and the distance is doubled then force can be written as

F' = 2q1q2/4r^2

F' = 1/2F

Therefore the force is reduced to half.

The measurement represents a stress of approximately 70 MPa on the stainless steel.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for the output voltage of a Wheatstone bridge:

Vout = Vsupply[tex]* (R4/R1) * (R2/(R2+R3)) * (1 + ε*S)[/tex]

where:

Vsupply is the power supply voltage (4.0 V in this case)

R1, R2, R3, and R4 are the resistances in the Wheatstone bridge

ε is the strain (350 μm/m in this case)

S is the gage factor (1.8 in this case)

We know that under zero strain conditions, the gage resistance is 120 ohms, so we can assume that R4 is also 120 ohms. We also know that R2 = R3 = 110 ohms. Therefore, R1 can be calculated as follows:

R1 = R2 || R3 = [tex](R2 * R3) / (R2 + R3) = (110 * 110) / (110 + 110) = 55 ohms[/tex]

Now we can plug in all the values and solve for Vout:

Vout =[tex]4.0 * (120/55) * (110/(110+110)) * (1 + 350e-6 * 1.8) ≈ 1.84 mV[/tex]

The galvanometer current can be calculated using Ohm's law:

I = Vout / Rg = 1.84e-3 / 70 = 26.3 μA

Finally, we can calculate the stress using the formula:

[tex]σ = ε * E[/tex]

where E is the modulus of elasticity for stainless steel. The modulus of elasticity for stainless steel varies depending on the specific alloy, but a typical value is around 200 GPa (200e9 Pa). Therefore:

[tex]σ = 350e-6 * 200e9 ≈ 70 MPa[/tex]

So the measurement represents a stress of approximately 70 MPa on the stainless steel.

Learn more about Wheatstone bridge circuit

brainly.com/question/12904969

#SPJ11

The maximum angle the string will make with the vertical at the highest point obtained is [tex]34.2^o[/tex]. The answer is [tex]34.2^o[/tex].

Given:

The length of the string is [tex]1.1 m[/tex]

The initial velocity of the ball [tex]1.1 m/s[/tex]

Angle with the vertical at the initial position [tex]25 degrees[/tex]

Find the vertical height from the initial position to the highest point:

[tex]h = 1.1 * sin(25)[/tex]

Calculate the potential energy at the highest point:

Potential Energy at the highest point is:

[tex]PE = m * h * g[/tex]

Calculate the initial kinetic energy of the ball:

[tex]KE = 0.5 * m * (v)^2\\KE = 0.5 * m * (1.1)^2[/tex]

Equate the initial kinetic energy to the potential energy at the highest point:

[tex]0.5 * m * (1.1)^2 = m * h * g[/tex]

Solve for the maximum angle at the highest point:

[tex]\theta= sin^{-1}((1.1)^2 / (2 * 1.1 * 9.81))\\ \theta= 34.2^o[/tex]

Therefore, The maximum angle the string will make with the vertical at the highest point is [tex]34.2^o[/tex].

To know more about the potential energy:

https://brainly.com/question/24284560\

#SPJ12