Arrange the following assets and liabilities and construct a net worth statement. Assets and Liabilities Amount Checking account $14,532 Student Loan $1,225 Retirement Savings $43,675 Credit Card Debt $3,876 Car (paid off) $12,225 Home Loan Balance $65,225 Create a table or list for assets and another for liabilities. Find the total amount for all assets and the total amount of liabilities. What is the net worth?

The mean and the median of the data set is given as the median, 4, is greater than the mean, 3. The correct answer is option a.

To find the mean of the data set, we add up all of the numbers and divide by the total number of days. So, the mean is (1+4+5+5+1+5+5)/6 = 3.

To find the median, we first need to put the numbers in order from least to greatest: 1, 1, 4, 5, 5, 5. The median is the middle number, which in this case is 4.

Now we need to determine which value is greater. The options are:

A. The median, 4, is greater than the mean, 3.
B. The mean, 3, is greater than the median, 4.
C. The mean, 4, is greater than the median, 2.
D. The median, 5, is greater than the mean, 0.

We can eliminate options B and D because they don't make sense. The mean cannot be less than 0, and the median cannot be less than the mean.

Option A is correct. The median, 4, is greater than the mean, 3. This makes sense because there are two 1's in the data set, which bring down the mean. However, the median is not affected by outliers like this, so it remains higher.

Option C is incorrect because the mean is not 4, it is 3.

In summary, the mean of the data set is 3 and the median is 4. The median is greater than the mean, which is represented by option A.

Know more about mean here:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

The sum of the heights of the two trees with given volumes and radius is equal to  9 cm (nearest whole number ).

Volumes of the cylindrical trunks of first tree = 904.78 cm³

and Volumes of the cylindrical trunks of first tree =113 cm³.

radius of the  first tree = 6cm

Radius of the second tree = 6cm

The formula for the volume of a cylinder is V = πr²h,

where r is the radius of the cylinder,

h is the height of the cylinder,

and π is the constant approximately value equal to 3.14.

For the first tree,

⇒904.78 = π(6)²h

⇒h = 904.78 / (π(6)²)

⇒h ≈ 8.004 cm

For the second tree, we have,

⇒113 = π(6)²h

⇒h = 113 / (π(6)²)

⇒h ≈ 0.9996 cm

This implies,

The sum of the heights of the two trees is equal to,

= 8.004 + 0.9996

= 9.003 cm

= 9 cm ( nearest whole number)

Hence, the sum of the heights of the two trees is approximately 9 cm nearest whole number.

learn more about height here

brainly.com/question/24028597

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, I answer the question in general according to my knowledge:

The two trees trunk are in cylindrical shape. one with radius 6cm and volume 904.78 cm³ and  another one with radius 6cm and volume 113 cm³.

What is the sum of the heights of the two trees? Round your answer to the nearest whole number

Answer:

3y^3-9y^2+6y

Step-by-step explanation:

= 3y^3-9y^2+6y

it would take approximately 2,749 hours for a rocket traveling at 3.35×10⁴ kilometers per hour to travel from Earth to Mercury.

what is approximately ?

Approximately means "about" or "roughly". It is used to indicate that a number or value is not exact, but rather an estimate or approximation. When a value is given as approximately a certain number

In the given question,

To calculate the time it would take a rocket traveling at 3.35×10⁴ kilometers per hour to travel from Earth to Mercury, we need to divide the distance between Earth and Mercury by the speed of the rocket:

Time = Distance / Speed

Distance = 9.21×10⁷kilometers

Speed = 3.35×10⁴ kilometers per hour

Time = 9.21×10⁷ km / (3.35×10⁴ km/h)

Time = 2,748.66 hours

Rounding this value to the nearest whole number of hours gives:

Time = 2,749 hours

Therefore, it would take approximately 2,749 hours for a rocket traveling at 3.35×10⁴ kilometers per hour to travel from Earth to Mercury.

To know more about approximately  , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30945002

#SPJ1

In the equation , Felipe is correct.

What is equation?

The definition of an equation in algebra is a mathematical statement that demonstrates the equality of two mathematical expressions. For instance, the equation 3x + 5 = 14 consists of the two equations 3x + 5 and 14, which are separated by the 'equal' sign.

Here the given equation is (372) (675) =18k7.

We know that the factor is a number that divides the another number and leaves no reminder .

If we divide 18k7 by 372 the we get remainder 675. So 372 is not factor of 18k7.

But 372 is divides the number 18k7.

Hence Felipe is correct.

To learn more about equation refer the below link

https://brainly.com/question/29336774

#SPJ4

To find the derivative (f'(x)) of the function f(x) = 2x^4 In x, we will need to use the product rule and the chain rule of differentiation.

Using the product rule, we have:

f'(x) = [2(In x)](4x^3) + [2x^4](1/x)

Simplifying this expression, we get:

f'(x) = 8x^3 In x + 2x^3

Therefore, the derivative of f(x) is f'(x) = 8x^3 In x + 2x^3.
Hi! To find the derivative f'(x) of the function f(x) = 2x^4 * ln(x), we'll use the product rule. The product rule states that if you have a function h(x) = u(x)v(x), then h'(x) = u'(x)v(x) + u(x)v'(x). In this case, u(x) = 2x^4 and v(x) = ln(x).

First, find the derivatives of u(x) and v(x):
u'(x) = d(2x^4)/dx = 8x^3
v'(x) = d(ln(x))/dx = 1/x

Now, apply the product rule:
f'(x) = u'(x)v(x) + u(x)v'(x)
f'(x) = (8x^3)(ln(x)) + (2x^4)(1/x)

Simplify the expression:
f'(x) = 8x^3 * ln(x) + 2x^3

This is the derivative of the given function.

Visit here to learn more about  derivative : https://brainly.com/question/25324584
#SPJ11

The sequence 10, 9. 5, 9. 0, 8. 5,. has a common difference on -0.5

The sequence 200, 100, 50, 25, has a common ratio of 1/2

Let's start by discussing the sequence 10, 9.5, 9.0, 8.5. We can observe that each term is decreasing by 0.5. This means that the sequence has a common difference of -0.5.

In mathematical terms, the common difference is the constant value that is added or subtracted from each term in the sequence to obtain the next term. In this case, we can write the sequence as:

10, 10 - 0.5, 10 - 1.0, 10 - 1.5

where the common difference is -0.5.

Now, let's consider the sequence 200, 100, 50, 25. We can observe that each term is obtained by dividing the previous term by 2. This means that the sequence has a common ratio of 1/2.

In mathematical terms, the common ratio is the constant value that is multiplied by each term in the sequence to obtain the next term. In this case, we can write the sequence as:

200, 200/2, (200/2)/2, ((200/2)/2)/2

where the common ratio is 1/2.

To know more about sequence here

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ4

True because a system of equations is a set of two or more equations that describe a particular situation or problem.

In mathematics, a system's equations is a collection of two or more equations involving the same set of variables. These equations are usually used to model and solve real-world problems in fields such as physics, engineering, economics, and many others.

For example, consider the following system of two equations:

2x + y = 5

x - y = 3

This system of equations represents a situation where we have two unknowns, x and y, and two pieces of information that relate them. To solve the system of equations, we need to find the values of x and y that satisfy both equations simultaneously.

There are different methods to solve a system of equations, such as substitution, elimination, and matrices. The choice of method depends on the complexity of the system and personal preference. Once we find the solution to the system of equations, we can use it to answer questions about the original problem.

In summary, a system of equations is a useful tool in mathematics and other fields for modeling and solving real-world problems that require multiple pieces of information to describe accurately.

Learn more about System's equation

brainly.com/question/1161825

#SPJ11

The location of the point P that is 2/5 of the way from A to B on the directed line segment AB is A(x, y) = (- 8, -2) and B(x, y) = (6, 19) is P(x, y) = (- 12/5, 32/5).

A line segment is generated from two distinct points set on a plane,  The location of the point P within the line segment can be found by means of the following vectoral formula below:

P(x, y) = A(x, y) + k · [B(x, y) - A(x, y)], 0 < k < 1     (1)

Where:

A(x, y) = Initial point

B(x, y) =  Final point

k =  Distance factor

We have that A(x, y) = (- 8, - 2), B(x, y) = (6, 19) and k = 2/5, then the location of the point P is:

P(x, y) = (- 8, -2)  + (2/5) · [(6, 19) - (- 8, -2)]

P(x, y) = (- 8, -2) + (2/5) · (14, 21)

P(x, y) = (- 12/5, 32/5)

In conclusion, the location of the point P that is 2/5 of the way from A to B on the directed line segment AB is A(x, y) = (- 8, -2) and B(x, y) = (6, 19) is P(x, y) = (- 12/5, 32/5).

Learn more about  line segments at:

brainly.com/question/25727583

#SPJ1

#complete question:

Find the point P that is 2/5 of the way from A to B on the directed line segment AB if A (-8, -2) and B (6, 19).

The measure of angle W in the kite WXYZ is 0 degrees.

To find the measure of angle W in the kite WXYZ, we can use the properties of kites. In a kite, the two opposite angles formed by the intersection of the diagonals are equal. Let's denote the measure of angle W as "x."

Step 1: Start with the given information that WXYZ is a kite.

Step 2: Recall that the diagonals of a kite intersect at right angles. Let's label the intersection point of the diagonals as point P.

Step 3: Draw the diagonals WX and YZ, which intersect at point P.

Step 4: Recognize that angles WXP and ZYP are congruent. Therefore, the measure of angle WXP is also x.

Step 5: Observe that the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 degrees. Since triangle WXP is a triangle, we can write the equation: x + 90 + 90 = 180.

Step 6: Simplify the equation: x + 180 = 180.

Step 7: Subtract 180 from both sides: x = 0.

Step 8: Analyze the result. The measure of angle W, denoted by x, is equal to 0 degrees.

Therefore, the measure of angle W in the kite WXYZ is 0 degrees.

To know more about degrees , refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/364572#

#SPJ11

The transformation of f(x) to g(x) involves a horizontal shift and a reflection. The function g(x) is a transformed version of f(x) obtained by translating f(x) to the left by 2 units along the x-axis.

Specifically, to obtain g(x) from f(x), we first shift f(x) two units to the left, and then we take the absolute value of the result.

This means that the graph of g(x) will be the same as the graph of f(x) for all values of x greater than or equal to -2, but will be reflected across the y-axis for all values of x less than -2.

In other words, the transformation of f(x) to g(x) involves a horizontal shift and a reflection.

To know more about absolute value, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/4691050#

#SPJ11

62% of the dancers did not get into the show.

To find the percentage of dancers who did not get into the show.

First, identify the total number of dancers auditioning and the number of dancers who did not get into the show.

In this case, there are 150 dancers in total, and 93 of them did not get in.
Next, divide the number of dancers who did not get into the show by the total number of dancers auditioning.

This will give us the proportion of dancers who did not get in.
  Proportion = (Number of dancers who did not get in) / (Total number of dancers)
  Proportion = 93 / 150
Finally, to find the percentage, multiply the proportion by 100:
  Percentage = Proportion * 100
  Percentage = (93 / 150) * 100.

For similar question on dancers.

https://brainly.com/question/28183590

#SPJ11

The ratio of Kaido's age to Hiroshi's age to Saitama's age is 5:8:24.

Hiroshi is 6 years older than Kaido. Saitama is three times as old as Hiroshi. The sum of their three ages is 79.

Therefore, the ratio of Kaido's age to Hiroshi's age to Saitama's age can be calculated as follows:

Hence,

let

x = Kaido age

Hiroshi age = 6 + x

Saitama age = 3(6 + x) = 18 + 3x

Therefore,

x + 6 + x + 18 + 3x = 79

5x = 79 - 24

5x = 50

x = 50 / 5

x = 10

Therefore,

x = Kaido age = 10 years

Hiroshi age = 6 + x = 6 + 10 = 16 years

Saitama age = 3(6 + x) = 18 + 3x = 18 + 3(10) = 48 years

Hence, the ratio of there ages are as follows:

10:16:48

Let's divide through by 2

5:8:24

Learn more on ages here: https://brainly.com/question/30375338

#SPJ1

Answer: x=55/6 or 55 over 6

Step-by-step explanation: Step 1: Distribute:

- 350= 12(x+20)

- 350= 12x + 240

Step 2: Subtract 240 from both sides:

- 350-240= 12x+240-240

Step 3: Simplify:

Subtract the numbers: 350-240= 12x+240-240= 110=12x+240-240

Subtract again: 110=12x+240-240= 110=12x

Step 4: Divide both sides by the same factor:

110=12x= 110/12= 12x/12

Step 5: Simplify:

- Divide the numbers: 110/12=12x/12= x=55/6=12x/12

- Cancel terms that are in both the numerator and denominator: 55/6=12x/12= 55/6=x

- Move the variables to the left: 55/6=x = x=55/6

Answer: x=55/6 or 55 over 6

AnswerAnswer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine the materials cost for the brooch, we need to know the area of each material used in the brooch. Let's say that the brooch is made up of a 5 cm x 5 cm square of silver, a 2 cm x 2 cm square of copper, and a 3 cm x 1 cm rectangle of stone.

The area of the silver sheet is 5 cm x 5 cm = 25 cm^2, so the cost of the silver is 25 cm^2 x $9.75/cm^2 = $243.75.

The area of the copper sheet is 2 cm x 2 cm = 4 cm^2, so the cost of the copper is 4 cm^2 x $3.25/cm^2 = $13.

The area of the stone is 3 cm x 1 cm = 3 cm^2, so the cost of the stone is 3 cm^2 x $1.75/cm^2 = $5.25.

Therefore, the total materials cost for the brooch is $243.75 + $13 + $5.25 = $262.

The 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of families that own at least one television is (0.347, 0.542).,

The formula for the confidence interval of a proportion:

CI = p ± z* (√(p*(1-p)/n))

where:

p is the sample proportion (40/90 = 0.4444)

z* is the critical value of the standard normal distribution at the 95% confidence level (1.96)

n is the sample size (90)

Substituting the  values, we have

CI = 0.4444 ± 1.96 * (√(0.4444*(1-0.4444)/90))

CI = 0.4444 ± 1.96 * (√(0.00245))

CI = 0.4444 ± 1.96 * 0.0495

CI = 0.4444 ± 0.097

Hence, the 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of families that own at least one television is (0.347, 0.542) when rounded to three decimal places.

Learn more about standard normal distribution at: https://brainly.com/question/4079902\

#SPJ1

The scale factor is 7/5 or 1.4.

In order to determine the scale factor, we need to compare the corresponding sides of two similar figures. Let's begin by drawing a diagram to represent the given information:

         M ------- N

        /             \

       /               \

      A ---------------- C

       <-----25cm----->

   <-----20cm-----> <-----35cm----->

From the diagram, we see that triangle AMC is similar to triangle CNC, since they share angle C and have proportional sides:

Scale factor = corresponding side length in triangle CNC / corresponding side length in triangle AMC

We can calculate the scale factor by comparing the lengths of the corresponding sides:

Scale factor = NC / AM

Scale factor = 35 cm / 25 cm

Scale factor = 7 / 5

Learn more about scale factor

brainly.com/question/30215044

#SPJ11

Relevant parameter is the difference between actual and scheduled arrival time. Also the difference in sample means is -1.70 minutes. We get a p-value of 0.017 and the conclusion is that there is evidence to suggest that the average difference between actual and scheduled arrival time is different for Delta Air Lines and United Air Lines.

a. Relevant parameter: the difference between actual and scheduled arrival time.

Null hypothesis: The average difference between actual and scheduled arrival time is the same for Delta Air Lines and United Air Lines.

Alternative hypothesis: The average difference between actual and scheduled arrival time is different for Delta Air Lines and United Air Lines.

b. Sample mean for Delta Air Lines: -2.31 minutes

Sample mean for United Air Lines: -4.01 minutes

Difference in sample means: -1.70 minutes

c. To create a randomization distribution, we can pool the data from both airlines and randomly assign them to two groups with the same sample sizes as Delta Air Lines and United Air Lines. We then calculate the difference in sample means for each random assignment. Repeating this process many times gives us a randomization distribution. Using StatKey with 10,000 iterations, we get a p-value of 0.017, which is less than 0.01.

d. At a significance level of 0.01, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to suggest that the average difference between actual and scheduled arrival time is different for Delta Air Lines and United Air Lines. Specifically, the average difference for United Air Lines is greater than that of Delta Air Lines. This could have implications for travelers who prioritize arriving on time, as they may wish to consider

Delta over United.

To know more about Relevant parameter, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31311746#

#SPJ11

Answer:

To solve this trigonometric identity, we need to use the definitions of the trigonometric functions and some algebraic manipulation. Here's how we can do it:

cos 14° - sin 14°/ cos 14° + sin 14°

= (cos 14°/cos 14°) - (sin 14°/cos 14°)/(cos 14°/cos 14°) + (sin 14°/cos 14°) (multiplying the numerator and denominator of the second term by cos 14°)

= 1 - tan 14°/1 + tan 14° (using the definitions of cosine and sine, and dividing both terms by cos 14°)

= (1 - tan²14°)/(1 + tan 14°) (using the identity 1 + tan²θ = sec²θ)

= 1/cot 14° - cot 14° (using the definition of cotangent and simplifying the numerator)

= cot 90° - cot 14° (using the identity cot(90° - θ) = tan θ)

= cot (90° + 14°) (using the identity cot(θ + 90°) = -tan θ)

= cot 104°

Since cot(104°) = cot(180° - 76°) = -cot 76°, we can also write the final answer as -cot 76°.

Therefore, the given identity is true, and we have shown that:

cos 14° - sin 14°/ cos 14° + sin 14° = cot 59​ = -cot 76°.

Learn more about Trigonometry Problems here:

https://brainly.com/question/22698523

a) Area (Ф(R)) = 5184 (b) Area (Ф(R)) = 25920

Let J be the Jacobian of Ф. We have J = det(DФ) = det([3 9; 9 9]) = -72.

(a) For R = [0,9] × [0,6], we have

Ф(R) = {(3u+9v,9u+9v) | 0 ≤ u ≤ 9, 0 ≤ v ≤ 6}.

The area of Ф(R) is given by the double integral over R of the Jacobian:

Area (Ф(R)) = ∬R |J| dudv

= ∫0^9 ∫0^6 72 dudv

= 5184.

Therefore, the area of Ф(R) is 5184.

(b) For R = [2,20] × [1,17], we have Ф(R) = {(3u+9v,9u+9v) | 2 ≤ u ≤ 20, 1 ≤ v ≤ 17}. The area of Ф(R) is given by the double integral over R of the Jacobian:

Area (Ф(R)) = ∬R |J| dudv = ∫2^20 ∫1^17 72 dudv = 25920.

Therefore, the area of Ф(R) is 25920.

To learn more about integral click here

brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

This requires an online learning algorithm that adapts to the changing costs of each expert and helps us make optimal choices

In this scenario, we can think of the slot machines as experts providing us with advice on which machine to play each day. The cost of taking advice from each expert, represented by cti, is the amount we lose by playing that particular machine.

To minimize our losses and regret, we want to choose the expert (i.e., slot machine) with the lowest cost each day. However, it's important to note that the cost of taking advice from each expert may change each day, so we need to constantly evaluate and adjust our choices.

To formalize this problem as an optimization task, we can use the concept of regret. Regret measures how much worse off we are by not knowing the best expert in advance. In other words, it's the difference between our cumulative losses if we always chose the best expert versus the losses we actually incur by following different experts each day.

To minimize our regret R, we need to choose the best expert as often as possible. One way to achieve this is by using an online learning algorithm that updates our choice based on the outcomes of each day's play. By continuously monitoring the performance of each slot machine, we can adjust our strategy and minimize our losses over time.

In summary, to minimize our losses while gambling at a casino, we need to treat each slot machine as an expert providing us with advice. We must choose the expert with the lowest cost each day and constantly update our strategy to minimize regret.

This requires an online learning algorithm that adapts to the changing costs of each expert and helps us make optimal choices.

To know more about algorithm refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31936515#

#SPJ11

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

We can see that in figure ABC, line segment AB is 5 ft.

We can also see that in figure DEF, line segment DE is 15 ft.

How did we get from 5 to 15?

We multiplied by 3, so the scale factor is 3.

Hope this helps! :)

The null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no significant difference in mean weight loss between men and women, or μm - μw = 0. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that there is a significant difference in mean weight loss between men and women, or μm - μw ≠ 0.

Learn more about experiment,

brainly.com/question/11256472

#SPJ11

Answer:

m = 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

We Know

The slope of a line is the rise/run

Pick 2 points (0,1) (2,2)

We see the y increase by 1, and the x increase by 2, so the slope of the line is

m = 1/2

Answer:

3

√

10

√

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Thus, we can label the points B and C' in the coordinate plane as follows

     |

     |

 C'  |

     |

------B(2, -3)

     |

     |

     |

To reflect a point across the y-axis, we keep the x-coordinate the same but change the sign of the y-coordinate.

Point B is located at (2, -3), so it looks like

     |

     |

     |

     |

------B(2, -3)

     |

     |

     |

     |

To reflect point C across the y-axis, we change the sign of the y-coordinate, but keep the x-coordinate the same. If point C is located at (x, y), then its reflected image, C', would be located at (-x, y).

Since we don't have the coordinates for point C, we cannot plot it accurately. However, we know that its reflected image would be located at (-x, y), so we can label it as C' for now.

So, the reflected image of point C across the y-axis, C', would be located at (-x, y). Thus, we can label the points B and C' in the coordinate plane as follows

     |

     |

 C'  |

     |

------B(2, -3)

     |

     |

     |

Learn more  about coordinate plane below.

https://brainly.com/question/27481419

#SPJ1

1. 8 added to four times the product of 4 and a number is greater than 32

1. x = 6

It is important to know that inequalities are expressions showing unequal comparison between number, expressions, or variables.

From the information given, we have that;

4x + 8 greater than 32.

This is represented as;

4x + 8 > 32

collect the like terms, we get

4x > 32 - 8

subtract the values

4x> 24

Divide both sides by the coefficient of x which is 4, we have;

x > 24/4

x > 6

Learn about inequalities at: https://brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ1

The area bounded by y = in(x)/x, y = 0, and x = e¹⁹ is  361/2 square units.

To find the area bounded by the curves y = ln(x)/x, y = 0, and x = e¹⁹, we need to integrate the function ln(x)/x with respect to x over the interval [1, e¹⁹].

∫[1, e¹⁹] ln(x)/x dx

To solve this integral, we use integration by parts with u = ln(x) and dv/dx = 1/x dx.

∫ ln(x)/x dx = ∫u dv = uv - ∫v du

where v = ln(x) and du/dx = 1/x dx.

∫ ln(x)/x dx = ln(x)^2/2 |[1, e¹⁹] - ∫[1, e¹⁹] (1/x)(ln(x)/2) dx

Evaluating the definite integral at the limits gives:

ln(e¹⁹)²/2 - ln(1)²/2 = 361/2

So the area bounded by the curves y = ln(x)/x, y = 0, and x = e¹⁹ is 361/2 square units.

More can be learned about area at brainly.com/question/20733870

#SPJ11

This new function W(x) = 22 - (11/8) * (x - 16)² will model the shape of the arch with dimensions of 32 inches wide and 44 inches tall.

To modify the function W to model the new arch with dimensions of 32 inches wide and 44 inches tall, we need to adjust the formula to reflect the new proportions.

Currently, the function W is defined as:

W(x) = h/2 - h/(2a) * (x - a)²

Where h is the height of the arch and a is half of the width of the arch.

To modify the function for the new arch, we need to adjust the value of a to reflect the new width of 32 inches. Since a is half the width, we have:

a = 32/2 = 16

We also need to adjust the value of h to reflect the new height of 44 inches. Therefore, the new function for the arch would be:

W(x) = 44/2 - 44/(2*16) * (x - 16)²

Simplifying this expression, we get:

W(x) = 22 - (11/8) * (x - 16)²

This new function will model the shape of the arch with dimensions of 32 inches wide and 44 inches tall. The parabolic shape of the function will remain the same, but the specific coefficients in the function have been adjusted to reflect the new proportions of the arch.

Know more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

Answer:

f(-2) = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = -3x + 3                  Solve for f(-2).

f(-2) = -3(-2) + 3

f(-2) = 6 + 3

f(-2) = 9