Answer:
[tex]\large \boxed{\sf \ \text{2 feet, 4 seconds, 258 feet } \ }[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello,
To know the height of the baseball when it is hit we have to compute h(0), as t = 0 is when the baseball is hit into the air.
[tex]h(0)=-16\cdot 0^2+128 \cdot 0+2=2[/tex]
So, the answer is 2 feet.
h(x) is a parabola which can be written as [tex]ax^2+bx+c[/tex], it means that the vertex is the point (-b/2a,h(-b/2a)).
The baseball reached its maximum height after
[tex]\dfrac{-b}{2a}=\dfrac{-128}{-2*16}=\boxed{4 \text{ seconds}}[/tex]
And the maximum height of the baseball is h(4).
[tex]h(0)=-16\cdot 4^2+128 \cdot 4+2=-256+512+2=\boxed{258 \ \text{feet}}[/tex]
Hope this helps.
Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.
Thank you
Efficiency is the ratio of output work to input work, expressed as a percentage. Light bulbs put out less light energy than the amount of electrical energy that is put into the bulb. An illustration of a wide arrow with a light bulb at the tail of it labeled electrical energy 100 J, breaks into a small arrow going forward labeled light 10 J and a larger curling away labeled heat 90 J. The goal of the bulb is to produce light. What is the efficiency of this bulb as it works to put out light? 10% 80% 90% 100%
Answer:
10%
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the given formula with the given data, we have ...
efficiency = output work / input work
= (10 J)/(100 J) = 0.10 = 10%
Answer:
A) 10%
Step-by-step explanation:
10/100=10
Syrus is buying a tent with the dimensions shown below. The volume inside the tent is 4.5 m34.5\text{ m}^34.5 m34, point, 5, start text, space, m, end text, cubed. Syrus isn't sure if the tent will be tall enough for him to stand inside. What is the height of the tent?
Answer:
2 meters
Step-by-step explanation:
The volume is 4.5
⋅1.5⋅h⋅3
=2.25h
=h
The height of the tent is 2 meters.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
2 meters
Step-by-step explanation:
Noah tried to prove that cos(θ)=sin(θ) using the following diagram. His proof is not correct.
Answer:
The first statement is incorrect. They have to be complementary.
Step-by-step explanation:
You can't say the measure of angle B is congruent to theta because it is possible for angles in a right triangle to be different.
You can only say that what he said is true if the angle was 45 degrees, but based on the information provided it is not possible to figure that out.
The other two angles other than the right angle in a right triangle have to add up to 90 degrees, which is the definition of what it means for two angles to be complementary. A is the correct answer.
Answer:
[tex]\boxed{\sf A}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
The first statement is incorrect. The angle B is not equal to theta θ. The two acute angles in the right triangle can be different, if the triangle was an isosceles right triangle then angle B would be equal to theta θ.
The graph of an exponential function has a y-intercept of 4 and contains the point (3,500). Construct the exponential function that describes the graph.
Answer:
The "formula" for an exponential function is f(x) = a * bˣ where a is the initial value / y-intercept. Therefore, a = 4 so f(x) = 4 * bˣ. To solve for b, we can plug in the values x = 3 and f(x) = 500 which becomes:
500 = 4 * b³
125 = b³
b = 5 so the answer is f(x) = 4 · 5ˣ.
Answer:
f(x)=4(5)x
Step-by-step explanation:
An exponential equation in the form y=a(b)x has initial value a and common ratio b. The initial value is the same as the y-intercept, 4, so the equation is in the form y=4(b)x. Substituting the point (3,500) gives 500=4(b)3. Solve for b to find that the common ratio is 5.
In a study of cell phone usage and brain hemispheric dominance, an Internet survey was e-mailed to 6970 subjects randomly selected from an online group involved with ears. There were 1334 surveys returned. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the return rate is less than 20%. Use the P-value method and use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution.
Answer:
we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the return rate is less than 20%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
Sample size;n = 6970
Success rate;X = 1334/6970 = 0.1914
Now, we want to test the claim that the return rate is less than p = 0.2, hence the null and alternative hypothesis are respectively;
H0: μ < 0.2
Ha: μ ≥ 0.2
The standard deviation formula is;
σ = √(x(1 - x)/n)
σ = √(0.1914(1 - 0.1914)/6970)
σ = 0.004712
Now for the test statistic, formula is;
z = (x - μ)/σ
z = (0.1914 - 0.2)/0.004712
z = -1.825
From the a-distribution table attached, we have a value of 0.03362.
This p-value gotten from the z-table is more than the significance value of 0.01. Thus, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the return rate is less than 20%.
Which correlation coefficient could represent the relationship in the scatterpot. Beach visitors
Answer:
A. 0.89.
Step-by-step explanation:
The value of correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to 1. Any value outside this range cannot possibly be correlation coefficient of a scatter plot representing relationship between two variables.
The scatter plot given shows a positive correlation between average daily temperatures and number of visitors, as the trend shows the two variables are moving in the same direction. As daily temperature increases, visitors also increases.
From the options given, the only plausible correlation that can represent this positive relationship is A. 0.89.
Find the area of the shaded region. The graph to the right depicts IQ scores of adults, and those scores are normally distributed with a
mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
n
f0 and
102
130
are
The area of the shaded region is (Round to four decimal places as needed.)
sions
Kented in
V3 and
andomly
d by in-
on affect
otes
ents
le
Enter your answer in the answer box and then click Check Answer.
section
different
version
Clear All
Check Answer
All parts showing
Answer: 0.4255
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: IQ scores of adults, and those scores are normally distributed
Mean: [tex]\mu=100[/tex]
Standard deviation: [tex]\sigma= 15[/tex]
Let X denotes the IQ of a random adults.
The area between 102 and 130 = [tex]P(102<X<130)=P(\dfrac{102-100}{15}<\dfrac{X-\mu}{\sigma}<\dfrac{130-100}{15})[/tex]
[tex]=P(0.13<Z<2)\ \ \ [Z=\dfrac{X-\mu}{\sigma}]\\\\=P(Z<2)-P(Z<0.13)\\\\=0.9772- 0.5517\ [\text{By z-table}]\\\\=0.4255[/tex]
Hence, area between 102 and 130 = 0.4255
Please help what’s the answer!!!
Answer:
-1
Step-by-step explanation:
Anything raised to 0 is 1
Multiply i 1 by 1
Simplify.
Rewrite i2 as −1
Move −1 to the left of i
Rewrite −1 i as −i
Factor out i2
Rewrite i2 as −1
Rewrite i2 as −1
Rewrite i4 as 1
Multiply −1 by 1
Please help!! Over several years, Stephon gathered data about his age and the time it took him to run two laps on the school track. The scatter plot shows the data he gathered and the line of best fit. The equation of the line of best fit is y = -2.1x + 565.6. Based on the line of best fit, approximately how long will it take Stephon to run two laps on the track when he is 192 months old?
Answer:
Time taken by Stephen = 162 seconds
Step-by-step explanation:
Stephan gathered data which fits in the line of best fit,
y = -2.1x + 565.6
Where x represents the age (in months)
And y represents the time (in seconds) taken by Stephen to run two laps on the track.
Time taken to run 2 laps at the age of 192 months,
By substituting x = 192 months,
y = -2.1(192) + 565.6
= -403.2 + 565.6
= 162.4 seconds
≈ 162 seconds
Therefore, time taken by Stephen to cover 2 laps was 162 seconds when he was 192 months old.
Please helppp!!!!! Geometry
Answer:
[tex]\boxed{Option \ 4}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
∠YVZ = 180 - 52 - 43 - 38 (Angles on a straight line add up to 180 degrees so if we try to find an unknown angle on the straight line, we need too subtract all the other angles from 180 degrees)
=> ∠YUZ = 47 degrees
Step-by-step explanation: In the figure shown, <UVW is a straight angle.
This means it measures 180 degrees.
So to find <YVZ, we add up all the angles and subtract the sum
from 180 to get the answer to this problem.
43 + 52 + 38 gives us a sum of 133.
Now we take 180 - 133 yo get 47.
So m<YVZ is 47 degrees.
Use Newton's method to approximate the indicated root of the equation correct to six decimal places. The negative root of ex = 4 − x2
Answer:
x = -1.964636
Step-by-step explanation:
Given equation;
eˣ = 4 - x²
This can be re-written as;
eˣ - 4 + x² = 0
Let
f(x) = eˣ - 4 + x² -----------(i)
To use Newton's method, we need to get the first derivative of the above equation as follows;
f¹(x) = eˣ - 0 + 2x
f¹(x) = eˣ + 2x -----------(ii)
The graph of f(x) has been attached to this response.
As shown in the graph, the curve intersects the x-axis twice - around x = -2 and x = 1. These are the approximate roots of the equation.
Since the question requires that we use the negative root, then we start using the Newton's law with a guess of x₀ = -2 at n=0
From Newton's method,
[tex]x_{n+1} = x_n + \frac{f(x_{n})}{f^1(x_{n})}[/tex]
=> When n=0, the equation becomes;
[tex]x_{1} = x_0 - \frac{f(x_{0})}{f^1(x_{0})}[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} = -2 - \frac{f(-2)}{f^1(-2)}[/tex]
Where f(-2) and f¹(-2) are found by plugging x = -2 into equations (i) and (ii) as follows;
f(-2) = e⁻² - 4 + (-2)²
f(-2) = e⁻² = 0.13533528323
And;
f¹(2) = e⁻² + 2(-2)
f¹(2) = e⁻² - 4 = -3.8646647167
Therefore
[tex]x_{1} = -2 - \frac{0.13533528323}{-3.8646647167}[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} = -2 - \frac{0.13533528323}{-3.8646647167}[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} = -2 - -0.03501863503[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} = -2 + 0.03501863503[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} = -1.9649813649[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} = -1.96498136[/tex] [to 8 decimal places]
=> When n=1, the equation becomes;
[tex]x_{2} = x_1 - \frac{f(x_{1})}{f^1(x_{1})}[/tex]
[tex]x_{2} = -1.96498136 - \frac{f(-1.9649813)}{f^1(-1.9649813)}[/tex]
Following the same procedure as above we have
[tex]x_{2} = -1.96463563[/tex]
=> When n=2, the equation becomes;
[tex]x_{3} = x_2 - \frac{f(x_{2})}{f^1(x_{2})}[/tex]
[tex]x_{3} = -1.96463563- \frac{f( -1.96463563)}{f^1( -1.96463563)}[/tex]
Following the same procedure as above we have
[tex]x_{3} = -1.96463560[/tex]
From the values of [tex]x_2[/tex] and [tex]x_3[/tex], it can be seen that there is no change in the first 6 decimal places, therefore, it is safe to say that the value of the negative root of the equation is approximately -1.964636 to 6 decimal places.
Newton's method of approximation is one of the several ways of estimating values.
The approximated value of [tex]\mathbf{e^x = 4 - x^2}[/tex] to 6 decimal places is [tex]\mathbf{ -1.964636}[/tex]
The equation is given as:
[tex]\mathbf{e^x = 4 - x^2}[/tex]
Equate to 0
[tex]\mathbf{4 - x^2 = 0}[/tex]
So, we have:
[tex]\mathbf{x^2 = 4}[/tex]
Take square roots of both sides
[tex]\mathbf{ x= \pm 2}[/tex]
So, the negative root is:
[tex]\mathbf{x = -2}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{e^x = 4 - x^2}[/tex] becomes [tex]\mathbf{f(x) = e^x - 4 + x^2 }[/tex]
Differentiate
[tex]\mathbf{f'(x) = e^x +2x }[/tex]
Using Newton's method of approximation, we have:
[tex]\mathbf{x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}}[/tex]
When x = -2, we have:
[tex]\mathbf{f'(-2) = e^{(-2)} +2(-2) = -3.86466471676}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{f(-2) = e^{-2} - 4 + (-2)^2 = 0.13533528323}[/tex]
So, we have:
[tex]\mathbf{x_{1} = -2 - \frac{0.13533528323}{-3.86466471676}}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{x_{1} = -2 + \frac{0.13533528323}{3.86466471676}}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{x_{1} = -1.96498136}[/tex]
Repeat the above process for repeated x values.
We have:
[tex]\mathbf{x_{2} = -1.96463563}[/tex]
[tex]\mathbf{x_{3} = -1.96463560}[/tex]
Up till the 6th decimal places,
[tex]\mathbf{x_2 = x_3}[/tex]
Hence, the approximated value of [tex]\mathbf{e^x = 4 - x^2}[/tex] to 6 decimal places is [tex]\mathbf{ -1.964636}[/tex]
Read more about Newton approximation at:
https://brainly.com/question/14279052
Write the following Arithmetic Sequence using a Recursive Formula: a = -7 + 3(n - 1)
A : A1 = -7, an = an-1 + 3
B : A1= -7, a, = an+1 + 3
C : A1 = 3, an = an+1 - 7
D : A1 = 3, an = an-1 - 7
NEED ANSWER ASAP
Answer:
A : A1 = -7, an = an-1 + 3
Step-by-step explanation:
a1=-7, a2=-7+(1)3=-4
a3=-7+(2)3=-1
What is the average rate of change of f(x)=-2/x^2 when the interval is 1 to 2
Answer:
1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
average rate of change = (f(x2) - f(x1))/(x2 - x1)
f(x) = -2/x^2
f(x2) = f(2) = -2/(-2)^2 = -2/4 = -0.5
f(x1) = f(1) = -2/1^2 = -2
average rate of change = (-0.5 - (-2))/(2 - 1)
average rate of change = (-0.5 + 2)/1
average rate of change = 1.5
Please help! I got 14 but it says it's incorrect! Find the maximum number of real zeros of the polynomial. f(x)=2x^(6)-3x^(3)+1-2x^(5)
Answer:
There are two or zero positive solutions and zero negative roots (zeros).
Step-by-step explanation:
Use Descartes' Rule of Signs to determine the number of real zeros of [tex]f(x)=2x^6-3x^3+1-2x^5[/tex]
[tex]f(x)=2x^6-2x^5-3x^3+1\\[/tex]
The ratio of boys to girls in Jamal's class is 3:2. If four more girls join the class, there will be the same number of boys and girls. What is the number of boys in the class?
Answer:
4 boys
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent boys and y represent girls
Hence, x : y = 3 : 2
x/y = 3/2
2x = 3y ------ (1)
x/y + 4 = 3/3
3x = 3(y + 4)
3x = 3y + 12 --------- (2)
From (1): x = 3y/2
Substitute x into (2) we have:
9y/2 = 3y + 12
9y = 6y + 24
9y - 6y = 24
3y = 24
∴ y = 8
From (2) : 3x = 24 - 12 = 12
∴ x = 4
Hence there Four boys
Draw a picture of the standard normal curve and shade the area that corresponds to the requested probabilities. Then use the standard normal table to find the following probabilities. Enter the probabilities as decimals. Enter the final answer only. 1.P(z>1.38)= 2.P(1.233 −2.43)= 7.P(z>−2.43)=
Answer:
a)P [ z > 1,38 ] = 0,08379
b) P [ 1,233 < z < 2,43 ] = 0,1012
c) P [ z > -2,43 ] = 0,99245
Step-by-step explanation:
a) P [ z > 1,38 ] = 1 - P [ z < 1,38 ]
From z-table P [ z < 1,38 ] = 0,91621
P [ z > 1,38 ] = 1 - 0,91621
P [ z > 1,38 ] = 0,08379
b) P [ 1,233 - 2,43 ] must be P [ 1,233 < z < 2,43 ]
P [ 1,233 < z < 2,43 ] = P [ z < 2,43 ] - P [ z > 1,233 ]
P [ z < 2,43 ] = 0,99245
P [ z > 1,233 ] = 0,89125 ( approximated value without interpolation)
Then
P [ 1,233 < z < 2,43 ] = 0,99245 - 0,89125
P [ 1,233 < z < 2,43 ] = 0,1012
c) P [ z > -2,43 ]
Fom z-table
P [ z > -2,43 ] = 1 - P [ z < -2,43 ]
P [ z > -2,43 ] = 1 - 0,00755
P [ z > -2,43 ] = 0,99245
what other numbers can you square that result in 9 ?
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not sure what your answers are, but you can only square 3 and -3 to get 9.
Answer:
3, -3
Step-by-step explanation:
3*3 = 9
-3 * -3 = 9
These are the only two numbers that square to 9
Find the length ofPR
Answer:
PR=8x+4
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
PQ=3x-2
QR=5x+6
Required:
PR=?
Formula:
PR=PQ+QR
Solution:
PR=PQ+QR
PR=3x-2+5x+6
PR=3x+5x+6-2
PR=8x+4
Hope this helps ;)❤❤❤
Answer:
4(2x + 1)
Step-by-step explanation:
4(2x + 1)
A family dines in a popular franchise restaurant. At the end of the meal, they decide to leave their server a monetary tip that is equal to 20% of the total bill amount, $60.50. How much will the family leave their server as a tip?
Answer:
$12.10
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you have to set up a proportion to find what 20% of $60.50, or 60.5, is. On one side of the proportion you have 20/100 to represent the percent, anytime you have a percent it will always go over 100. On the other side you'll have x/60.5 because you are trying to find a value out of 60.5. This gives you the proportion 20/100=x/60.5. In order to solve this you have to cross multiply using the equation 20(60.5)=100x. First, you multiply to get 1210=100x, then divide both sides by 100 to get 12.1=x. In order for this to represent money, we add a zero on the end. This means that 20% of $60.50 is $12.10, so $12.10 is the tip.
Need help with solving for x!
Answer:
x = c × sin(α)
x = 15 x sin(38)
= 9.23492
= 9.2
Step-by-step explanation:
A group of patients select from among 38 numbers, with 18 odd numbers (black) and 18 even
numbers (red), as well as 0 and 00 (which are green). If a doctor pays $7 that the outcome is an odd
number, the probability of losing the $7 is 20/38 and the probability of winning $14 (for a net gain of
only $7, given you already paid $7) is 18/38
If a doctor pays $7 that the outcome is an odd number, how would you figure out what is the doctors
expected value is?
Answer: $2.95
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: Probability of losing the $7 = [tex]\dfrac{20}{38}[/tex]
Probability of winning $14 = [tex]\dfrac{18}{38}[/tex]
Then, the expected value = (- $7) x ( Probability of losing the $7) + $14 x(Probability of winning $14)
= [tex](-\$ 7)\times\dfrac{20}{38}+(\$14)\times\dfrac{18}{38}[/tex]
= [tex]-\dfrac{70}{19}+\dfrac{126}{19}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{56}{19}\times\approx\$2.95[/tex]
∴ If a doctor pays $7 that the outcome is an odd number, the doctor's
expected value is $2.95.
[tex]3x+5y=7\\9x+11y=13[/tex] Solve for the variables.
Answer:
x = -1
y =2
Step-by-step explanation:
3x+ 5y = 7
9x+ 11y = 13
Multiply the first equation by -3 so we can eliminate x
-3 (3x+ 5y = 7)
-9x -15y = -21
Add this to the second equation
-9x -15y = -21
9x+ 11y = 13
-------------------
- 4y = -8
Divide by -4
-4y/-4 = -8/-4
y=2
Now solve for x
3x+5y = 7
3x+5(2) = 7
3x+10 = 7
Subtract 10
3x = 7-10
3x = -3
Divide by 3
3x/3 = -3/3
x = -1
Answer:
-1, 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Although you already have the answer, here's another method of doing it that may or may not help you someday. First, we solve the top equation for x. We get:
[tex]x = \frac{7}{3} - \frac{5}{3}y\\9x + 11y = 13[/tex]
Now that we know what x is, we can plug it into the bottom equation to solve for y.
[tex]9(\frac{7}{3} - \frac{5}{3}y) + 11y = 13[/tex]
Simplify everything out, and you'll see that y = 2. We can now plug it into our equation to solve for x.
x = 7/3 - 5/3 x 2; x = -1
In the periodic compound interest formula Upper A equals Upper P (1 plus StartFraction r Over n EndFraction )Superscript nt , what does the variable n represent?
Answer:
The variable n represents the number of times in a year in which we compound the interest rate
Step-by-step explanation:
The periodic compound interest formula is given as;
A = P( 1 + r/n)^nt
The variable n represents the number of times in a year in which the interest rate is compounded
omplete)
HWS
X 3.3.13-BE
The manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) for a particular car is $25,495, and it is expected to be worth $20,081 in 2 years.
(a) Find a linear depreciation function for this car.
(b) Estimate the value of the car 4 years from now.
(c) At what rate is the car depreciating?
(a) What is the linear depreciation function for this car?
f(x) =
(Simplify your answer. Do not include the $ symbol in your answer.)
Answer:
a) y = 25495 - 2707x
b) y = 25495 - 2707(4) = 14,667
c) $2,707 per year
Step-by-step explanation:
Value now: $25,495
Value in 2 years: $20,081
Loss of value in 2 years: $25,495 - $20,081 = $5,414
Loss of value per year: $5,414/2 = $2,707
a) y = 25495 - 2707x
b) y = 25495 - 2707(4) = 14,667
c) $2,707 per year
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME! To find x
ANSWERS
A-(11)
B-(14)
C-(7)
D-(3)
Answer:
C-(7)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given figure is a trapezoid and 21 - x is the mid segment.
Therefore by mid-segment formula of a trapezoid, we have:
21 - x = 1/2(17 + 11)
21 - x = 1/2 * 28
21 - x = 14
21 - 14 = x
7 = x
x = 7
what is 4 1/3 x 4 1/5=
Answer:
18 1/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey there!
Well to multiply them let's make them improper.
13/3 * 21/5
13*21 = 273
3*5 = 15
273/15
Simplified
18 1/5
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
[tex]\huge\boxed{4\dfrac{1}{3}\times4\dfrac{1}{5}=18\dfrac{1}{5}}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]4\dfrac{1}{3}\times4\dfrac{1}{5}\\\\\bold{STEP\ 1}\\\text{convert the mixed numbers to the improper fractions}\\\\4\dfrac{1}{3}=\dfrac{4\times3+1}{3}=\dfrac{12+1}{3}=\dfrac{13}{3}\\\\4\dfrac{1}{5}=\dfrac{4\times5+1}{5}=\dfrac{20+1}{5}=\dfrac{21}{5}\\\\\bold{STEP\ 2}\\\text{simplify fractions}\\\\4\dfrac{1}{3}\times4\dfrac{1}{5}=\dfrac{13}{3}\times\dfrac{21}{5}=\dfrac{13}{1}\times\dfrac{7}{5}\\\\\bold{STEP\ 3}\\\text{multiply numerators and denominators}\\\\=\dfrac{13\times7}{1\times5}=\dfrac{91}{5}[/tex]
[tex]\bold{STEP 4}\\\text{convert the improper fraction to the mixed number}\\\\=\dfrac{91}{5}=\dfrac{90+1}{5}=\dfrac{90}{5}+\dfrac{1}{5}=18\dfrac{1}{5}[/tex]
Simplify the expression:
4 + 5u + 8 – 4
Answer:
5u+8
Step-by-step explanation:
Both of the 4's will cancel out with each other.
5u+8. it works actuallly by taking common nunbers and cancelling them. in this case. 4. leaving it with just 5u+8 :)
Question 15
1 pts
The cost of three avatars and three bats is $29.85. The cost of
three avatars and two bats is $23.90. How much will you pay
altogether if you purchase one of each.
O $5.95
O $8.92
$9.95
O $10.99
O $11.00
1 pts
Question 16
9
Answer:
$9.95.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's say that you are buying a avatars and b bats.
3a + 3b = 29.85
Divide all terms by 3.
a + b = 9.95
You will pay $9.95 if you buy one of each.
Hope this helps!
Data on the weights (lb) of the contents of cans of diet soda versus the contents of cans of the regular version of the soda is summarized to the right. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Use a 0.01 significance level for both parts.
Diet Regular
μ μ1 μ2
n 20 20
x 0.78062lb 0.81645 lb
s 0.00444 lb 0.00745 lb
A. Test the claim that the contents of cans of diet soda have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for the regular soda.
What are the null and alternative and hypotheses?
B. What is the test statistic? (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
C. What is the P-value? (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
State the conclusion for the test.
A. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the cans of diet soda have mean weights that are lower than the mean weight for the regular soda.
B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the cans of diet soda have mean weights that are lower than the mean weight for the regular soda.
C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the cans of diet soda have mean weights that are lower than the mean weight for the regular soda.
D. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the cans of diet soda have mean weights that are lower than the mean weight for the regular soda.
b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).
___lb < u1 - u2 < ___lb (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
Does the confidence interval support the conclusion found with the hypothesis test?
(No/Yes) because the confidence interval contains (zero/only positives values/ only negative values)
Answer:
(A) Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu_1 \geq \mu_2[/tex]
Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu_1<\mu_2[/tex]
(B) The value of t-test statistics is -18.48.
(C) The P-value is Less than 0.005%.
(D) Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the cans of diet soda have mean weights that are lower than the mean weight for the regular soda.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that the Data on the weights (lb) of the contents of cans of diet soda versus the contents of cans of the regular version of the soda is summarized to the right;
Diet Regular
μ μ1 μ2
n 20 20
x 0.78062lb 0.81645 lb
s 0.00444 lb 0.00745 lb
Let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] = mean weight of contents of cans of diet soda.
[tex]\mu_2[/tex] = mean weight of contents of cans of regular soda.
So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu_1 \geq \mu_2[/tex] {means that the contents of cans of diet soda have weights with a mean that is more than or equal to the mean for the regular soda}
Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu_1<\mu_2[/tex] {means that the contents of cans of diet soda have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for the regular soda}
The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviations;
T.S. = [tex]\frac{(\bar X_1 -\bar X_2)-(\mu_1- \mu_2)}{s_p \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }[/tex] ~ [tex]t__n_1_+_n_2_-_2[/tex]
where, [tex]\bar X_1[/tex] = sample mean weight of cans of diet soda = 0.78062 lb
[tex]\bar X_2[/tex] = sample mean weight of cans of regular soda = 0.81645 lb
[tex]s_1[/tex] = sample standard deviation of cans of diet soda = 0.00444 lb
[tex]s_2[/tex] = sample standard deviation of cans of regular soda = 0.00745 lb
[tex]n_1[/tex] = sample of cans of diet soda = 20
[tex]n_2[/tex] = sample of cans of diet soda = 20
Also, [tex]s_p =\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^{2}+ (n_2-1)s_2^{2}}{n_1+n_2-2} }[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(20-1)\times 0.00444^{2}+ (20-1)\times 0.00745^{2}}{20+20-2} }[/tex] = 0.00613
So, the test statistics = [tex]\frac{(0.78062-0.81645)-(0)}{0.00613 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{20}+\frac{1}{20} } }[/tex] ~ [tex]t_3_8[/tex]
= -18.48
The value of t-test statistics is -18.48.
Also, the P-value of the test statistics is given by;
P-value = P( [tex]t_3_8[/tex] < -18.48) = Less than 0.005%
Now, at a 0.01 level of significance, the t table gives a critical value of -2.429 at 38 degrees of freedom for the left-tailed test.
Since the value of our test statistics is less than the critical value of t as -18.48 < -2.429, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region.
Therefore, we conclude that the contents of cans of diet soda have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for the regular soda.
CAN ANYONE HELP ME THANKS FOR BRAINLIEST ANSWER? Find slope ( simplest form) parallel to the line 4x+2y=3
Answer:
Slope = -2
Step-by-step explanation:
You want to get it to the slope intercept form first.
2y = -4x + 3
Divide by 2
y = -2x + 3/2
Parallel means in the new slope intercept form there will still be -2x.
y = -2x + b (enter in points ( 0, 1.5 ) )
1.5 = 0 + b
b = 1.5
y = -2x + 1.5 ( just an example of a line parallel to 4x + 2y = 3 )