20 points

Write a paragraph in which you explain how reading this interview gave you insights into why some people seek out scary experiences.t.

As a health minister, I strongly believe that addressing gender in health is not a waste of resources but a crucial step towards achieving overall health and development goals. Gender is a significant determinant of health outcomes, and without addressing gender issues, we cannot achieve health equity and sustainable development.

Investing in a gender desk is essential because it provides a platform for analyzing and addressing gender-specific health challenges. For instance, women often face specific health challenges that men do not face, such as reproductive health issues, pregnancy-related complications, and gender-based violence. A gender desk would enable us to collect and analyze data on these issues and develop policies and interventions that address them.

Additionally, a gender desk would help us to ensure that our health policies and programs are gender-responsive. This means that they consider the specific needs, experiences, and circumstances of both men and women in their design, implementation, and evaluation. Gender-responsive health policies and programs have been shown to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities.

Therefore, I urge parliament to reconsider its decision to cut the budget for the gender desk and instead allocate the necessary resources for this important initiative. Investing in a gender desk is not a waste of resources but a critical step toward achieving our health and development goals.

To learn more about Genders,

https://brainly.com/question/10589574?referrer=searchResults

https://brainly.com/question/21900615?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

1. at himself

2. myself

3. herself

4. themselves

5. myself

6. himself

7. yourself

8. yourself

Explanation:

Hope you understand

Please mark my answer the brainliest

Thank you :)

Answer:

He looked at himself in the mirror.

I’m not angry with you. I’m angry with myself.

Margaret had a nice time in London. She enjoyed herself.

My friends had a nice time in London. They enjoyed themselves.

I picked up a very hot plate and burnt myself.

He never thinks about other people. He only thinks about himself.

I want to know more about you. Tell me about yourself.

Goodbye! Have a nice holiday and look after yourself!

(Please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest you could also follow me so that you could easily reach out to me for any other questions)

Answer:Bakhtin’s discussion of the chronotope is indeed useful in analysing any piece of literature. Every piece of literature has a setting in both place and time. The author could have written in a time and place separate to the time and place of the novel but what Bakhtin is concerned about is the time and place of the novel in his discussion of the chronotope. Every text has a historical background. As time has evolved, literature has also evolved;

Explanation:

Answer:

I once experienced a fire incident that I will never forget. It was a sunny day, and I was at home with my family when we noticed a strange smell in the air. We went outside to investigate and saw smoke coming from our neighbor's house. We immediately called the fire department and ran over to see if anyone needed help.

As we got closer, we saw flames coming out of the windows of our neighbor's house. We could hear the sound of glass shattering and the crackling of the fire as it burned through the walls. It was a terrifying sight, and we knew that we had to do something to help.

The fire department arrived quickly, but it took them some time to put out the fire. In the meantime, my family and I did our best to help our neighbors. We helped them move their belongings out of the house and offered them food and water. It was heart-wrenching to see the look of devastation on their faces as they watched their home go up in flames.

After the fire was finally put out, we learned that the cause of the fire was a faulty electrical wire in the basement. It was a stark reminder of how important it is to maintain the electrical systems in our homes and to be vigilant about potential hazards.

The experience left a deep impression on me. I was struck by the bravery of the firefighters who risked their lives to put out the fire and the kindness of my neighbors who came together to help one another. I also realized how easily a simple accident could lead to a tragedy. It made me appreciate the safety measures we take in our daily lives and the importance of being prepared for emergencies.

In conclusion, the fire incident I experienced was a terrifying and eye-opening experience. It taught me the importance of safety measures, the bravery of our first responders, and the importance of community support in times of crisis. It is a memory that will stay with me for the rest of my life, and I am grateful for the lessons it taught me.

Here is a thesis example you may use:

"Thousands of years ago dinosaurs roamed the Earth... Until one day they just disappeared. Or did they? Scientists believe that an asteroid killed off the entire dinosaur population or perhaps mother nature herself took matters into her own hands"

Central to qualitative research are words; to quantitative research are numbers. In this second type of research, you use the data-gathering technique called survey that uses interview and questionnaire, two data-gathering instruments that are made up of questions. Questions on things resulting from your experience are called factual questions; those on your interpretative or critical thinking are called analytical questions. Survey is a data-gathering tool while interview and questionnaire are data-gathering methods. Another quantitative data-gathering technique is the experiment that uses your sensory organs, specifically, your eyes and ears in collecting data. Watching and listening to people and things with your own eyes and ears is a direct kind of observation; with audio tape or video tape, is an indirect type of observation. Experimental research is one quantitative data-collection technique that aims at controlling variables to discover cause-and-effect relationships. This method involves independent and dependent variables. The dependent variable receives treatment or condition and, if it is given the performance rating of 95%, it will appear on a scale of measurement called interval scale.

Qualitative research is a type of research that involves collecting non-numerical data such as text, images, or observations. This type of research seeks to understand complex social phenomena by exploring the experiences, attitudes, and behaviors of people. On the other hand, quantitative research involves collecting numerical data through methods such as surveys, experiments, or statistical analysis. This type of research seeks to test hypotheses or theories, and to generalize findings to larger populations.

Find more useful information on Qualitative research ;

https://brainly.com/question/28580938

#SPJ1

Answer:

Answer:

1. The history of colored people in South Africa is complex and has been shaped by a long history of discrimination and segregation.

2. The term "colored" refers to people of mixed race heritage, including European, African, and Asian ancestry.

3. Colored people were subjected to a range of discriminatory laws and policies under apartheid, including forced removals from their homes and neighborhoods, restrictions on their movement, and unequal access to education and job opportunities.

4. Despite being non-white, colored people were often viewed as "in-between" and were not considered part of the black liberation struggle.

5. Colored people also faced discrimination from the black majority, who viewed them as collaborators with the white minority.

6. The legacy of apartheid continues to impact colored communities in South Africa today, with high levels of poverty, unemployment, and social inequality.

7. Not being able to trace one's heritage can be difficult as it can lead to a sense of disconnection and a loss of cultural identity, particularly for those who have been forcibly removed from their ancestral lands and communities.

Explanation:

Based on details in "The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone," the reason why the British decided to allow the French scholars to keep most of their collections was the agreement between the French and the British.

As explained in the article, the Treaty of Alexandria that ended the French campaign in Egypt included a provision that allowed French scholars to take the antiquities that they had collected during their expedition back to France. This provision was recognized and respected by the British officials who subsequently took control of Egypt after the French withdrew. Therefore, the decision to allow the French scholars to keep most of their collections was not based on protests, pleas, or friendship, nor was it motivated by fear of Napoleon or his army attacking. It was a result of a diplomatic agreement that the British authorities chose to honor.

FOR more information on Treaty of Alexandria see:

https://brainly.com/question/1439978

#SPJ1

As I ran through the crowded city streets, tears flying behind me, I began waving at a van. They took my daughter! I sprinted after them, but a man peered out the window and pointed a gun at me. I immediately jumped behind a light pole. *BOOM!* *CRASH!* A nearby shop's window shattered into a million pieces. I peered out, only to see the van disappear into the distance. Only if I had known what my daughter's cries meant earlier, I could've beaten the kidnapper to the core.

Answer:

Trees

Explanation:

Trees are another example of Land. Land is a natural resource that refers to the surface of the earth, including the soil, water, and natural vegetation. Trees are a part of the natural vegetation that grows on the land and are considered a natural resource because they can be used in various ways, such as for lumber, paper, and fuel.

Answer: broke

i mean that's what makes sense to me

Rachel's car had broken down once before, but this time it required a costly transmission replacement.

The most accurate paraphrase for sentence 1 is this: a. The shortage amounted to a hundred dollars.

The most accurate paraphrase for sentence 2 is: a. The students made loud objections to the new dress code.

The words that are related to stubborn are: dogmatic, rigid, and vociferous.

The words that are related to fitting for an event are; Appropriate and rudimentary.

A paraphrase is a summary of an idea. When summarizing a point, the idea is to rephrase the initial statement in a condensed form. In the above sentences, we are told to paraphrase and the resulting sentences retain the meaning of the original.

Also, in the other set of questions, related words are synonymous. A stubborn person can also be described as rigid and dogmatic.

The test questions:

Some of the questions from book 9 lesson 6 of the book are as follows:

Choose the most accurate paraphrase for the sentences:

1. The deficiency amounted to a hundred dollars.

a. The shortage amounted to a hundred dollars.

b. The excess amounted to a hundred dollars.

2. The students made vociferous objections to the new dress code.

a. The students made loud objections to the new dress code.

b. The students made muted objections to the new dress code.

3. Which word or words are related to stubborn?

a. dogmatic

b. rigid

c. callow

d. vociferous

4. Which word or words are related to fitting for an event?

a. approximate

b. appropriate

c. apropos

d. rudimentary

Learn more about synonyms here:

https://brainly.com/question/76433

#SPJ1

Answer:

great

Explanation:

In this case, it would be "great" because it is describing Jake Robinson. The writer is giving more description to Jackie Robinson which again is "great". I hope that helped!

Answer:

Using a different dialect for the narrator than the characters can serve several literary purposes. One reason is to create a contrast between the narrator and the characters, which can help to highlight the differences in their social or educational backgrounds. In the case of the book you are reading, the narrator's fancier dialect compared to the other characters' southern dialect could suggest that the narrator is from a more privileged or educated background than the characters, and may view the world and events of the story differently because of this.

Another reason for using a different dialect for the narrator is to establish a distinct narrative voice. By using a different dialect or register for the narrator, the author can give the narrative a unique tone or style that sets it apart from the characters' dialogue. This can be especially effective in first-person narratives, where the narrator's voice is crucial in shaping the reader's understanding of the story.

Overall, using a different dialect for the narrator than the rest of the characters can serve as a literary device to add depth to the story and create contrast between characters, as well as to establish a unique narrative voice.

Answer:

To showcase a perspective above the characters and storyline. Meaning, the narrator is above all.

Explanation:

This passage employs the ad populum fallacy, a form of flawed reasoning.

To lerarn more about slavery, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/18687007

Answer:

The appropriate way to complete an in-text citation would be option 3:

"Even notorious journalists are not fans of The Great Gatsby. One journalist states, "I find Gatsby aesthetically overrated, psychologically vacant, and morally complacent" (Schulz, 2013)."

This format includes the author's last name and the year of publication within parentheses after the quote. It is important to give credit to the source of the quote in a clear and consistent way, so the reader can easily find the source in the reference list.

Option D is the correct option. The “out with the old, in with the new” approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care about our country’s oldest buildings.

When I completed the homework and looked up the answers because none of them were correct, I discovered that 4, 5, and 6 were the appropriate answers. you're invited. Tysm! To correct logical errors and increase clarity, sentences need to be added, deleted, or altered. But occasionally, the author or speaker does mean to provide a weak case, usually in an effort to persuade readers' judgments or undermine their opponent. Knowing them and being able to see them is the greatest method to keep from using logical fallacies in your own writing. According to Aristotle, a verbal error occurs when the language employed is unclear or inaccurate, and a material fallacy occurs when an argument uses flawed or misleading data.

To know more about writing refer :

brainly.com/question/9511978

The complete question is :

How could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy

A) Everyone who appreciates our country’s oldest buildings should forget the architectural philosophy “out with the old, in with the new.”

B) Anyone who accepts the “out with the old, in with the new” architectural philosophy is a menace to society.

C) Some people have embraced the “out with the old, in with the new” philosophy, as the number of applications for demolition permits hit a record high this year.

D) The “out with the old, in with the new” approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care about our country’s oldest buildings.

#SPJ1

The houses of the ladies, Miss Smith, the dog of the ladies, the kids' names, and the language of these individuals.

Also, because they divide the information into smaller, simpler components, shorter sentences are better at communicating complicated ideas. The audience is misled by sentences that are overburdened with exceptions and dependent clauses because the core idea is obscured by the verbal jungle.

A simple sentence has a subject, a verb, and possibly an object as well as modifiers. There is just one independent clause in it, though.

To know more about  shorter sentences visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30503181

#SPJ1