You are going to spend no more than 5. 5 hours hiking. During the 5. 5 hours, you will take a 30 minute lunch break. You can hike at a rate of 3 miles per hour. What is the greatest number of miles that you can hike?

The equation of the plane tangent to the graph of f(x,y) at (1,0) is z = f(1,0) + 2(x - 1) + y.

a.) To find the equation of the plane tangent to the graph of f(x,y) at (1,0), we first need to find the partial derivatives of f(x,y) with respect to x and y. The partial derivative of f(x,y) with respect to x is 2xe^xy, and the partial derivative of f(x,y) with respect to y is x^3e^xy. Evaluating these at (1,0), we get 2(1)(1) = 2 and (1)^3(1) = 1. So the equation of the plane tangent to the graph of f(x,y) at (1,0) is z = f(1,0) + 2(x - 1) + y.

b.) The linear approximation of f(x,y) for (x,y) near (1,0) can be found using the formula L(x,y) = f(1,0) + fx(1,0)(x - 1) + fy(1,0)y, where fx and fy are the partial derivatives of f with respect to x and y evaluated at (1,0). We already found fx(1,0) to be 2 and fy(1,0) to be 1. Evaluating f(1,0), we get f(1,0) = 1, so the linear approximation of f(x,y) near (1,0) is L(x,y) = 1 + 2(x - 1) + y.

c.) The differential of f at point (1,0) is the linear transformation given by df(1,0)(x,y) = fx(1,0)x + fy(1,0)y. Plugging in fx(1,0) = 2 and fy(1,0) = 1, we get df(1,0)(x,y) = 2x + y.

For more about tangent:

https://brainly.com/question/10053881

#SPJ11

The amount of money that Gina will earn after working 40 hours is given as follows:

C. $250.

A proportional relationship is a type of relationship between two quantities in which they maintain a constant ratio to each other.

The equation that defines the proportional relationship is given as follows:

y = kx.

In which k is the constant of proportionality, representing the increase in the output variable y when the constant variable x is increased by one.

From the table, the constant is given as follows:

k = 93.75/15 = 125/20 = 6.25.

Hence the equation is:

y = 6.25x.

Then the amount earned working 40 hours is given as follows:

y = 6.25 x 40

y = $250.

More can be learned about proportional relationships at https://brainly.com/question/7723640

#SPJ1

We also know that Molly visited a city with two words in its name. This means Molly must have visited Des Moines, and Srey must have visited Pittsburgh. Therefore, the answer is d. Des Moines.

To solve this problem, we can create a table to keep track of the cities each person visited and their characteristics:

Person City Two words Starts with S

Cory  Yes Yes

Srey  

Molly  Yes

Mao   Yes

We know that there are four cities: Santa Clara, Seattle, Des Moines, and Pittsburgh, and each person visited a different city. We also know that only two cities have two words in their names (Santa Clara and Des Moines), and only two cities start with an S (Seattle and Santa Clara).

From the table, we see that Cory visited a city with two words and a name that starts with S. This means he visited Santa Clara or Seattle. Mao also visited a city that starts with S, which means Cory must have visited Santa Clara, and Mao visited Seattle. This leaves Des Moines and Pittsburgh for Srey and Molly.

However, we also know that Molly visited a city with two words in its name. This means Molly must have visited Des Moines, and Srey must have visited Pittsburgh.

Learn more about cities,

https://brainly.com/question/29292921

#SPJ4

To find the number of ways to choose 4 red marbles from the urn, we need to use the combination formula. The number of combinations of r objects chosen from a set of n objects is given by nCr = n!/r!(n-r)!.

In this case, we want to choose 4 red marbles from a total of 19, so n=19 and r=4. Plugging these values into the formula, we get 19C4 = 19!/4!(19-4)! = 3876. Therefore, there are 3876 ways to choose 4 red marbles from the urn containing 19 red marbles and 14 blue marbles when 16 marbles are chosen in total.

To determine the number of ways to choose 4 red marbles from the 19 available, we will use the concept of combinations. Combinations allow us to calculate the number of possible arrangements without considering the order. The formula for combinations is C(n, r) = n! / (r! * (n-r)!), where n represents the total number of items and r is the number of items to choose.

In this case, n = 19 (total red marbles) and r = 4 (red marbles to be chosen). Applying the formula, we have C(19, 4) = 19! / (4! * (19-4)!). After calculating, we get 3876 ways to choose 4 red marbles from the urn.

Visit here to learn more about  combinations :  https://brainly.com/question/29594894
#SPJ11

The values assigned to a population parameter based on the value(s) of a sample statistic are estimations or inferences about the true value of the parameter. These estimations are derived from the sample data and are used to make conclusions about the entire population.

In statistical inference, researchers often collect data from a sample of the population because it is often impractical or impossible to collect data from the entire population. The sample statistics, such as the sample mean or sample proportion, provide information about the characteristics of the sample. However, these statistics are not typically equal to the population parameters they represent.

To estimate the population parameters, researchers use statistical techniques to calculate confidence intervals or conduct hypothesis tests. These techniques allow them to assign a range of plausible values to the population parameter based on the sample statistic. The assigned values take into account the variability of the sample data and the desired level of confidence in the estimation.

For example, if a researcher wants to estimate the average income of a population, they can collect a sample of individuals' incomes and calculate the sample mean. This sample mean is a statistic that provides an estimate of the population mean income. By using statistical techniques, the researcher can assign a range of values, known as a confidence interval, to the population mean based on the sample mean and the variability in the data. The confidence interval provides a level of certainty about the plausible values for the population parameter.

In summary, the values assigned to a population parameter based on a sample statistic are estimations or inferences derived from the sample data. These values are obtained through statistical techniques such as confidence intervals or hypothesis testing, which consider the variability of the sample and provide a range of plausible values for the population parameter. These estimations allow researchers to make conclusions about the population based on the information obtained from the sample.

Learn more about Sample:

brainly.com/question/12823688

#SPJ11

A regression model is a statistical approach to determine the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.

If a regression model involves only one independent variable, it is called a simple regression model. In simple regression, the dependent variable is modeled as a linear function of the independent variable. The model estimates the slope and intercept of the line that best fits the data, and uses them to predict the dependent variable for a given value of the independent variable. Simple regression is useful when there is a clear and strong relationship between the independent and dependent variables, and when there are no confounding variables or interactions with other independent variables.

To know more about regression model,

https://brainly.com/question/14983410

#SPJ11

The value of the car after two years is £8400.

Given that a car has an original value of £14000 after two years its cost has reduced by 40%,

We need to find the cost of the car in current year.

So, 100-40 = 60

Therefore, the value of the car after two years =

60% of 14000 = 0.60 × 14000

= 8400

Hence, the value of the car after two years is £8400.

Learn more about depreciation, click;

https://brainly.com/question/30531944

#SPJ4

2x + 17 grows no faster than 3x as x approaches infinity.

To show that 2x + 17 is O(3x), we need to find two positive constants, C and k, such that:

|2x + 17| <= C|3x| for all x > k

We can start by simplifying the left-hand side:

|2x + 17| = 2x + 17 (since x is always non-negative)

Next, we can simplify the right-hand side:

|3x| = 3x

Now, we need to find C and k that satisfy the inequality:

2x + 17 <= C*3x for all x > k

Dividing both sides by 3x, we get:

(2/3) + (17/3x) <= C for all x > k

Since (2/3) is a constant, we only need to find a value of k such that (17/3x) is less than some other constant. Let's choose k = 1, then:

(17/3x) < 6 for all x > 1

So, we can choose C = 6 and k = 1. Therefore, we have shown that:

|2x + 17| <= 6|3x| for all x > 1

This satisfies the definition of 2x + 17 being O(3x), which means that 2x + 17 grows no faster than 3x as x approaches infinity.

Learn more about big O notation

brainly.com/question/13257594

#SPJ11

Answer:

16 circumference ohh area and circumference is same man\women

IV. For large values of n, θc1 is the better estimator. However, for small values of n, θc2 may have a lower MSE due to its smaller variance, even though it has a larger bias.

In statistics, the mean (also known as the arithmetic mean or average) is a measure of central tendency that represents the sum of a set of numbers divided by the total number of numbers in the set.

(i) The bias of an estimator is defined as the difference between the expected value of the estimator and the true value of the parameter being estimated. For θ = 1/λ, we have E(θc1) = E[(1/n)ΣXi] = (1/n)ΣE(Xi) = (1/n)(1/λ)Σ1 = (1/λ), and E(θc2) = E[(1/(n+1))ΣXi] = (1/(n+1))ΣE(Xi) = (1/(n+1))(1/λ)Σ1 = (n/(n+1))(1/λ).

Therefore, the biases of θc1 and θc2 are:

bias(θc1) = E(θc1) - θ = (1/λ) - (1/λ) = 0

bias(θc2) = E(θc2) - θ = (n/(n+1))(1/λ) - (1/λ) = -1/(n+1)

(ii) The variance of an estimator measures how much the estimator varies across different samples. The variance of θc1 can be calculated as:

Var(θc1) = Var[(1/n)ΣXi] = (1/n²)ΣVar(Xi) = (1/n²)Σ(1/λ²) = (1/n)(1/λ²)

Similarly, the variance of θc2 can be calculated as:

Var(θc2) = Var[(1/(n+1))ΣXi] = (1/(n+1)²)ΣVar(Xi) = (1/(n+1)^2)Σ(1/λ²) = (1/(n+1))(1/λ²)

(iii) The mean squared error (MSE) of an estimator is the sum of its variance and the square of its bias. Thus, the MSE of θc1 is:

MSE(θc1) = Var(θc1) + bias(θc1)² = (1/n)(1/λ²)

The MSE of θc2 is:

MSE(θc2) = Var(θc2) + bias(θc2)^2 = (1/(n+1))(1/λ²) + (-1/(n+1))² = (n/(n+1)²)(1/λ²)

(iv) To compare the two estimators, we can look at their MSEs. Since MSE(θc1) = (1/n)(1/λ²) and MSE(θc2) = (n/(n+1)²)(1/λ²), we can see that as n increases, the MSE of θc1 decreases while the MSE of θc2 increases. Therefore, for large values of n, θc1 is the better estimator. However, for small values of n, θc2 may have a lower MSE due to its smaller variance, even though it has a larger bias.

To learn more about mean from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ4

The false statement among the given options is that "the degrees of freedom for a chi-square test is determined by sample size."

In reality, the degrees of freedom for a chi-square test are determined by the number of categories or groups being compared in the analysis. Specifically, the degrees of freedom are calculated by subtracting 1 from the number of categories. For example, if we are comparing three groups, the degrees of freedom would be 2 (3-1).

As for the other options, a chi-squared distribution with k degrees of freedom is more right-skewed than a chi-square distribution with k+1 degrees of freedom. This is because as the degrees of freedom increase, the distribution becomes more symmetrical.

A chi-square distribution never takes negative values, which is true. This is because it is a squared value, so it can never be negative.

Finally, the area under a chi-square density curve is always equal to 1, which is also true. This is because the total probability of all possible outcomes must equal 1.

Learn more about chi-square test here: https://brainly.com/question/29728594

#SPJ11

The sequence given is en, which stands for the natural exponential function raised to the power of n. This sequence is divergent because as n approaches infinity.

To determine whether the sequence is divergent or convergent, let's analyze the given limit:
lim (n → 0) e^n
Step 1: Identify the type of limit
Since the variable n is approaching 0, this is a limit at a specific point.

Step 2: Substitute the value
Substitute n with 0 in the expression e^n:
e^0

Step 3: Evaluate the expression
The exponential function e^0 is equal to 1, since any non-zero number raised to the power of 0 is 1.
So, lim (n → 0) e^n = 1

This limit exists and is finite, which means the sequence is convergent. The limit of the sequence is 1.

To learn more about exponential function : brainly.com/question/14355665

#SPJ11

Answer:

D. 50%

Step-by-step explanation:

The total amount of hours in the circle graph is equal to 24.

We just need to subtract the number of hours spent on sleeping and eating.

Sleeping = 9 hours

Eating = 3 hours

24 - 9 - 3 = 12 hours.

12 hours is half of 24 hours.

So, 50% is the answer. (D)

Please mark as Brainliest!

a. The probability that it will take more than 420 minutes to process all these books  is 0.4452.

b. The probability that at least 25 books will be processed in the first 240 minutes is  0.0002.

Let X be the time it takes to process one book, then X has a normal distribution with mean μ = 10 and standard deviation σ = 3.

(a) The total time it takes to process 40 books is Y = 40X. The mean of Y is E(Y) = E(40X) = 40E(X) = 40(10) = 400 minutes. The variance of Y is Var(Y) = Var(40X) = 40^2 Var(X) = 40^2 (3^2) = 14400. Therefore, the standard deviation of Y is σ(Y) = sqrt(Var(Y)) = 120.

To find the probability that it will take more than 420 minutes to process all these books, we standardize Y as follows:

Z = (Y - E(Y)) / σ(Y) = (420 - 400) / 120 = 1/6

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that P(Z > 1/6) ≈ 0.4452. Therefore, the approximate probability that it will take more than 420 minutes to process all these books is 0.4452.

(b) To find the probability that at least 25 books will be processed in the first 240 minutes, we standardize X as follows:

Z = (240 - μ) / σ = (240 - 10) / 3 = 230/3

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that P(Z > 230/3) ≈ 0.0002. Therefore, the approximate probability that at least 25 books will be processed in the first 240 minutes is 0.0002.

For similar question probability.

brainly.com/question/28444090

#SPJ11

75 employees were absent for six or more days.

To determine how many employees were absent for six or more days, we need to refer to the given frequency distribution of days absent:

- 0 up to 3 days: 2 employees

- 3 up to 6 days: 25 employees

- 6 up to 9 days: 14 employees

- 9 up to 12 days: 19 employees

- 12 up to 15 days: 42 employees

To find the number of employees absent for six or more days, we need to add the number of employees in the last three categories:

14 (6 up to 9 days) + 19 (9 up to 12 days) + 42 (12 up to 15 days) = 75 employees

Therefore, 75 employees were absent for six or more days.

Learn more about frequency here,

https://brainly.com/question/254161

#SPJ11

To find the integrating factor for the given

ODE

, we need to first rearrange the

equation

into the standard form of y' + p(x)y = q(x), where p(x) = 0 and q(x) = Ndx + x - t^3 + e^(-Nt^2).

Dividing both sides of the equation by N, we get:

dx/dt + (1/N)x = (1/N)t^3 - e^(-Nt^2)

Now, we can find the

integrating factor

by taking the exponential of the

antiderivative

of p(x), which is:

e^∫(1/N)dx = e^(x/N)

Therefore, the integrating factor for the given ODE is e^(x/N). Multiplying both sides of the ODE by this integrating factor, we get:

e^(x/N)dx/dt + (1/N)e^(x/N)x = (1/N)e^(x/N)t^3 - e^((x/N)-Nt^2)

Recognizing the left-hand side as the product rule of (e^(x/N)x), we can simplify the equation to:

d/dt(e^(x/N)x) = (1/N)e^(x/N)t^3 - e^((x/N)-Nt^2)

Integrating

both sides with respect to t, we get:

e^(x/N)x = (1/N)e^(x/N)(1/4)t^4 + (1/2N)e^((x/N)-Nt^2) + C

where C is the constant of integration. Solving for x, we get:

x = (1/N)(1/4)t^4 + (1/2N)e^(-Nx^2) + Ce^(-x/N)

where we have used the fact that e^(x/N) is never zero since x > 0. Therefore, we have found the

general solution

for the given ODE.

Learn more about

Differential Equation

here:-brainly.com/question/1164377

#SPJ11

Answer:

The area of the figure is 38.28cm².

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of the shape is the sum of the area of the semicircle, a rectangle, and a right triangle.

Area of a semicircle = r²

x 3.14 x (4/2)²  = 6.28 cm²

Area of the rectangle = length x width

6 x 4 = 24 cm²

Area of the right triangle =  x base x height

x (10 - 6) x 4 = 8cm²

Sum of the areas = 8 + 24 + 6.28 = 38.28cm²

brainliest???

Yes, using the 0.10 level of significance, we can conclude that the assembly time using the new method is faster.

To support this claim, we can conduct a hypothesis test:
1. Set up hypotheses:
Null hypothesis (H0): The mean assembly time using the new method is not faster (μ_new >= 64 minutes).

Alternative hypothesis (H1): The mean assembly time using the new method is faster (μ_new < 64 minutes).

2. Choose the level of significance (alpha): α = 0.10.

4. Determine the critical value: Since it's a one-tailed test, we look up the z-table for 0.10 level of significance. The critical value is -1.28.
5. Compare the test statistic to the critical value: Since -6.23 < -1.28, we reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, we can conclude that the assembly time using the new method is faster at the 0.10 level of significance.

Learn more about assembly here

https://brainly.com/question/30408621

#SPJ11

The researchers performed a chi-square analysis to test their hypothesis and used a significance level of 0.05.

The critical value in a chi-square analysis determines the threshold at which the null hypothesis can be rejected, based on the significance level selected.

In this case, the significance level is 0.05, and you provided a list of potential critical values: 3.84, 5.99, 7.82, and 9.49. To determine the correct critical value, we also need to know the degrees of freedom for this analysis. Degrees of freedom are calculated as (number of categories - 1).

However,  Common critical values for a significance level of 0.05 include 3.84 (for 1 degree of freedom), 5.99 (for 2 degrees of freedom), 7.82 (for 3 degrees of freedom), and 9.49 (for 4 degrees of freedom). If you can determine the number of categories involved in your analysis, you can then use this information to find the closest critical value for the researchers to use in their chi-square analysis.

To learn more about null hypothesis click here

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The total surface area of this box is 42 square ft.

Option B is the correct answer.

We have,

The total surface area of the box is the sum of the areas of its six sides.

The area of the bottom and top are both 3.2 ft x 2.1 ft

= 6.72 sq ft.

The area of the front and back are both 3.2 ft x 2.7 ft

= 8.64 sq ft.

The area of the two sides is both 2.1 ft x 2.7 ft

= 5.67 sq ft.

The total surface area.

= 2(6.72) + 2(8.64) + 2(5.67)

= 13.44 + 17.28 + 11.34

= 42.06 sq ft (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore,

The total surface area of this box is 42 square ft.

Learn more about box surface area here:

https://brainly.com/question/22998786

#SPJ1

The value of l, k, and c are 1, 284.2 and 4.0000 respectively. When f = 10%, V = -0.0032 mV, When f = 50%, V = 0.0092 mV, When f = 90%, V = -0.0193 mV.

(a) The formula given for f(V) is the logistic function, which is of the form f(V) = L / (1 + C*e^(-kV)). Therefore, we can compare this to the given formula to obtain:
L = 1
k = 1421/5 = 284.2
C = 4
Rounding C to four decimal places, we get C = 4.0000.

(b) To find the voltages at which 10%, 50%, and 90% of the channels are open, we can use the logistic function formula and solve for V when f = 0.1, 0.5, and 0.9 respectively.
For f = 0.1:
0.1 = 1 / (1 + 4*e^(-284.2V))
0.9 + 4*e^(-284.2V) = 10
e^(-284.2V) = 1.525
-284.2V = ln(1.525)
V = -0.0032 mV
For f = 0.5:
0.5 = 1 / (1 + 4*e^(-284.2V))
1 + 4*e^(-284.2V) = 2
e^(-284.2V) = 0.25
-284.2V = ln(0.25)
V = 0.0092 mV
For f = 0.9:
0.9 = 1 / (1 + 4*e^(-284.2V))
4*e^(-284.2V) = 9
e^(-284.2V) = 2.25
-284.2V = ln(2.25)
V = -0.0193 mV
Rounding these answers to two decimal places, we get:
When f = 10%, V = -0.0032 mV.
When f = 50%, V = 0.0092 mV.
When f = 90%, V = -0.0193 mV.

Learn more about value here: brainly.com/question/30145972

#SPJ11

The series[tex]Σ 5/n(ln(n))^p[/tex] converges for p > 1.

To determine the values of p for which the series Σ 5/n(ln(n))^p converges, we can use the Cauchy condensation test. The Cauchy condensation test states that if a series a_n is decreasing and positive, then Σ a_n converges if and only if Σ 2^na_2^n converges.

Applying this test to the series Σ 5/n(ln(n))^p, we have:

[tex]a_n = 5/n(ln(n))^p[/tex]

[tex]2^na_2^n = 5/(2^n)(ln(2^n))^p = 5/(2^n)(nln2)^p = (5/2^p)(1/n)(1/(ln2)^p)[/tex]

Since[tex]1/(ln2)^p[/tex] is a constant, we can ignore it and focus on the series 1/n. The series Σ 1/n diverges by the p-series test when p = 1, and converges when p > 1 by the integral test. Therefore, for p > 1, the series Σ 5/n(ln(n))^p converges by the Cauchy condensation test.

Conversely, for p ≤ 1, the seriesdi[tex]Σ 5/n(ln(n))^p[/tex]diverges, since the term 1/n diverges and the term (ln(n))^p does not compensate for its divergence.

In summary, the series[tex]Σ 5/n(ln(n))^p[/tex] converges for p > 1 and diverges for p ≤ 1.

To know more about Cauchy condensation test refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/6331682

#SPJ11

The measure of ML is 8.69

Pythagoras theorem states that ;the sum of the squares on the legs of a right triangle is equal to the square on the hypotenuse.

Therefore, a²+b²= c²

Line JL is a diameter and it passes in through the center of the circle meeting a tangent JK. The angle formed between this lines is 90°. Therefore ∆JKL is a right angled triangle and Pythagoras theorem can be applied.

JL = √ 10.3²+ 14²

JL = √ 302.09

JL = 17.38

ML = JL/2

ML = 17.38/2

ML = 8.69

therefore the measure of ML is 8.69

learn more about Pythagoras theorem from

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ1

The area of the shaded region is 152/3

Area of shaded region = area of the region on the left of the y-axis + area below the x-axis

area of region on left of y-axis = [tex]\int_{-2}^{0}[/tex] (x² -6x) dx

= [x³/3 - 6 × x²/2 [tex]]_{-2}^0[/tex]

= [x³/3 - 3 x² [tex]]_{-2}^0[/tex]

= [0 - 0 - (- 2)³/3 + 3 (- 2)² ]

= - (-8)/3 + 3 (4)

= 8/3 + 12

= 44/3

area below x-axis =  [tex]\int_{0}^{6}[/tex] (x² -6x) dx

= [x³/3 - 6 × x²/2 [tex]]_0^6[/tex]

= [x³/3 - 3 x² [tex]]_0^6[/tex]

= [ (6)³/3 - 3 (6)² - 0 + 0 ]

= (216)/3 - 3 (36)

=  72 - 108

= -36

We know that sign negative sign indicates that the area is under the X-axis

Total area = 44/3 + 36

= (44 + 108)/3

= 152/3

Therefore, the area of the shaded region is 152/3.

Learn more about Area here

https://brainly.com/question/30689896

#SPJ4

Given question is incomplete, the complete question is below

Find the area of the shaded region.

The total area of the shaded regions is

(Type an integer or a simplified fraction.)

The chief advantage of using a confidence interval to test this hypothesis rather than a significance test is (d) A confidence interval gives a set of plausible values for the true proportion.

Although the same hypotheses may be tested using both hypothesis testing and confidence intervals, the primary distinction is how the findings are interpreted. A confidence interval gives a range of possible values for the real population parameter with a particular level of confidence, unlike a hypothesis test, which yields a binary conclusion, either rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis.

A confidence interval would provide us with a range of likely values for the proportion of homes in the major town that have high-speed internet access, with a specific level of confidence, given the stated hypothesis. Compared to a basic hypothesis test, which merely offers a binary conclusion on the null hypothesis, this would offer more details about the population parameter of interest.

Complete Question:

Mr. Mastrogiacomo is testing the hypothesis that the proportion of households in a large town that have high-speed internet service is equal to 0.7 against the alternative that the proportion is different from 0.7. What is the chief advantage of using a confidence interval to test this hypothesis rather than a significance test?

(a) A confidence interval can be one-sided or two-sided but the significance test is always two-sided.

(b) The conditions for using a confidence interval are less restrictive than for a significance test.

(c) A confidence interval has more power than the significance test.

((d) A confidence interval gives a set of plausible values for the true proportion.

Read more about confidence interval on:

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ4

The formula for the nth term of the given sequence is 11 - 2n.

Given sequence is,

9 , 7 , 5...

First term, a = 9

Here, it is clear that the sequence is going in a way that 2 is subtracted from each preceding term.

So this is an arithmetic sequence.

Common difference, d = 7 - 9 = -2

nth term of an arithmetic sequence is,

a + (n - 1)d

nth term = 9 + (n - 1) (-2)

              = 9 - 2(n - 1)

              = 11 - 2n

Hence the nth term of the given sequence is 11 - 2n.

Learn more about Sequence here :

https://brainly.com/question/21691074

#SPJ1

The estimated number of sugar cubes that remain on Max's pyramid is C. 550 cubes.

To estimate the number of sugar cubes remaining on Max's pyramid, we need to subtract the number of cubes that fell off on the way to school and the number of cubes that Max's friends ate from the original 587 sugar cubes.

Subtracting 34 cubes that fell off on the way to school from 587 gives us 553 sugar cubes. Subtracting another 18 cubes that Max's friends ate from 553, we get 535 sugar cubes remaining on Max's pyramid.

Therefore, the closest answer choice to this estimate is C. 550 cubes.

Learn more about estimation here: https://brainly.com/question/14782205

#SPJ11

For  triangle EFD, the value of x is 24 units.

We know that the side-splitting theorem states that, 'if a line is parallel to one side of a triangle and intersects the other two sides, then it divides those sides proportionally.'

For  triangle EFD we can obaserve that GH is parallel to side ED.

By applying the side-splitter theorem to triangle EFD,

⇒ FG/GE = FH/HD

Here, FG = 18 units, GE = 6 units, HD = 8 units

substituting values,

⇒ 18/6 = x/8

⇒ 3 = x/8

⇒ x = 3 × 8

⇒ x = 24 units

Therefore, the value of x is 24 units.

Learn more about the side-splitting theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/15077193

#SPJ1

The probability that a randomly chosen toaster will have a total resistance of 345-355 ohms is approximately 0.7996, or 79.96%.

To find the probability that a randomly selected toaster will have a total resistance of 345 to 355 ohms, we need to know the distribution of total resistance and parameters such as mean and standard deviation.

Expecting that the dispersion of add up to resistance takes after a typical conveyance with cruel μ and standard deviation σ, ready to utilize the standard ordinary dispersion to calculate the likelihood that the entire resistance will be between 345 and 355 ohms.

 First, we need to normalize the 345 and 355 values ​​with the following formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x=desired value, μ = mean, σ = standard deviation, and z =corresponding z-score.

For x = 345 ohms:

z1 = (345 - μ) / σ

For x = 355 ohms:

z2 = (355 - μ) / σ

Next, we need to find the area under the standard normal distribution curve between z-scores z1 and z2. This represents the probability that the total resistance will be between 345 and 355 ohms.

You can find this range using a standard regular table or calculator. For example, using the standard normal table, we can find the region between z1 and z2 like this:

P(345 ≤ x ≤ 355) = P(z1 ≤ z ≤ z2) = Φ(z2) - Φ(z1)

where Φ(z) is the standard cumulative normal distribution function (CDF), the probability that a standard normal random variable is less than or equal to z.

For example, if z1 = -1.5 and z2 = 1.5, then

P(345 ≤ x ≤ 355) = P(z1 ≤ z ≤ z2) = Φ(1.5) - Φ(-1.5) = 0.8664 - 0.0668 ≈ 0.7996

Therefore, the probability that a randomly chosen toaster will have a total resistance of 345-355 ohms is approximately 0.7996, or 79.96% (assuming the distribution of total resistance follows a normal distribution with a known mean and standard deviation).

learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4