y. if the relative intensity of a sound is multiplied by 10 and results in a loudness of 120 decibels, what was the relative intensity of the original sound?

When the plane is about to land the volume of the pillow after landing will be 4.26 L.

At a cruising altitude of 10 km, the atmospheric pressure is less than 0.3 atm, but the cabin pressure is maintained at 0.75 atm.

Since the travel pillow is inflatable, we can assume that its initial volume at sea level is negligible. Therefore, we can use the ideal gas law to determine the volume of the pillow after landing.

PV = nRT

where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature.

Initially, the pressure inside the pillow is 0.75 atm, and the temperature is the same as the cabin temperature.

When the pillow is inflated at cruising altitude, the pressure inside the pillow is also 0.3 atm, and the temperature is lower than the cabin temperature due to the adiabatic expansion of the air inside the pillow.

However, since we are ignoring the elasticity of the pillow's material, we can assume that the number of moles of air inside the pillow remains constant.

Therefore, using the ideal gas law for both initial and final conditions, we have:

P1V1 = nRT1 and P2V2 = nRT2

where subscripts 1 and 2 denote initial and final conditions, respectively.

Solving for V2, we get:

V2 = (P1V1T2)/(P2T1)

Substituting the values, we get:

V2 = (0.75 atm)(1.7 L)(216.65 K)/(0.3 atm)(288.15 K) = 4.26 L

Therefore, the volume of the travel pillow after landing is 4.26 L.

For more such answers on volume

https://brainly.com/question/27710307

#SPJ11

The relationship between pressure and volume of a gas is inverse, meaning that as volume decreases, pressure increases.

This relationship is known as Boyle's Law, which states that at a constant temperature, the pressure and volume of a gas are inversely proportional to each other. This means that as one variable (volume) changes, the other variable (pressure) will change in the opposite direction. As the volume of a gas decreases, the molecules become more compressed and collide with the walls of the container more frequently, leading to an increase in pressure. Similarly, as the volume of a gas increases, the molecules have more space to move around and collide with the walls less frequently, resulting in a decrease in pressure.

learn more about Boyle's Law

https://brainly.com/question/1696010

#SPJ11

Answer:

ω2 = ω1 + 1/2 α t^2       equation for circular motion

ω2 = 0     and    α is negative since it is slowing

t = (ω1 * 2 / ,771)^1/2

t = (60.3 * 2 / .771)^1/2 = 12.5 sec

It takes 78.3 seconds (s) for the gyroscope to come to rest. The problem provides us with the initial rate of the gyroscope, which is 60.3 rad/s, and the rate at which it slows down, which is 0.771 rad/s2. To find the time it takes for the gyroscope to come to rest, we need to use the equation:

ωf = ωi + αt

where ωf is the final rate of the gyroscope (which is 0 since it comes to rest), ωi is the initial rate of the gyroscope (which is 60.3 rad/s), α is the rate of deceleration (which is -0.771 rad/s2 since it's slowing down), and t is the time it takes for the gyroscope to come to rest (what we're looking for).

Substituting the given values, we get:
0 = 60.3 - 0.771t

Solving for t, we get:

t = 78.3 s

Therefore, it takes 78.3 seconds for the gyroscope to come to rest.

To know more about gyroscope, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30214363

#SPJ11

The voltage can be expressed as: v(t) = 40 cos(2π(60)t + 2π(9)t)

where 60 Hz is the frequency in hertz and 9 Hz is the frequency in radians per second.

a) The maximum amplitude of the voltage is 40 volts.

b) The frequency in hertz is 60 Hz.

c) The frequency in radians per second is 2π(60) + 2π(9) = 378 radians per second.

d) The phase angle in radians is the coefficient of the t-term inside the cosine function, which is 2π(9) = 18π/5 radians.

To know more about voltage refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/29445057

#SPJ11

The required in-plane rotation angles to move from the axis of the rosette into a coordinate system yielding the in-plane principal strains are therefore approximately 31° and -59°.

To solve this problem, we can use the equations for the principal strains and maximum in-plane shear strain, as well as the equations for the in-plane rotation angles.

a. The principal strains and maximum in-plane shear strain at the point.

The principal strains can be found using the following equations:

ε_max = [tex](Eo + E90) / 2 + \sqrt{((Eo - E90)^2 / 4 + E45^2)[/tex]

Substituting the given values, we get:

ε_max = [tex](240 us + 160 us) / 2 + \sqrt{((240 us - 160 us)^2 / 4 + (275 ue)^2)[/tex]

           = 285 ue

ε_min = [tex](240 us + 160 us) / 2 - \sqrt{((240 us - 160 us)^2 / 4 + (275 ue)^2)[/tex]

          = -215 ue

The maximum in-plane shear strain can be found using the following equation:

γ_max = √((ε_max - ε_min)² / 4 + E45²)

          = 170 ue

So the principal strains are ε_1 = 285 ue and ε_2 = -215 ue, and the maximum in-plane shear strain is γ_max = 170 ue.

b. The required in-plane rotation angles to move from the axis of the rosette into a coordinate system yielding the maximum in-plane shear.

The in-plane rotation angle θ_s required to move from the axis of the rosette into a coordinate system yielding the maximum in-plane shear can be found using the following equation:

tan(2θ_s) = 2E45 / (Eo - E90)

Substituting the given values, we get:

tan(2θ_s) = 2(275 ue) / (240 us - 160 us)

                = 7/8

Since the maximum in-plane shear is in the positive 45-degree direction, we need to rotate the coordinate system counterclockwise by an angle of θ_s / 2 = atan(7/16) ≈ 29°.

However, since the rosette is already oriented at a 45-degree angle to the axes of the material, we also need to subtract 45° from this angle to get the required in-plane rotation angle.

Therefore, the required in-plane rotation angles to move from the axis of the rosette into a coordinate system yielding the maximum in-plane shear are approximately -14° and 76°.

c. The required in-plane rotation angles to move from the axis of the rosette into a coordinate system yielding the in-plane principal strains.

The in-plane rotation angle θ_p required to move from the axis of the rosette into a coordinate system yielding the in-plane principal strains can be found using the following equation:

tan(2θ_p) = (Eo - E90) / 2E45

Substituting the given values, we get:

tan(2θ_p) = (240 us - 160 us) / 2(275 ue)

                = 4/11

The required in-plane rotation angles to move from the axis of the rosette into a coordinate system yielding the in-plane principal strains are therefore approximately 31° and -59°.

To know more about refer principal strain here

brainly.com/question/26705365#

#SPJ11

The wavelength of visible light that would have a minimum at the same location on the screen is twice the wavelength of the blue light, or λ_min = 934 nm

In a double-slit experiment, the location of maxima and minima can be determined using the equation:

d sinθ = mλ

where d is the distance between the slits, θ is the angle between the line from the slits to the point on the screen, m is the order of the maximum or minimum, and λ is the wavelength of light.

For the second-order maximum, we have:

d sinθ = 2λ

Let's assume that the minimum for a certain wavelength λ_min occurs at the same location on the screen. For this minimum, we have:

d sinθ = (2n + 1)λ_min/2

where n is an integer.

Since the location on the screen is the same for both the second-order maximum and the minimum, we can set the two equations equal to each other:

2λ = (2n + 1)λ_min/2

Solving for λ_min, we get:

λ_min = 4λ/(4n + 2)

For n = 0 (the first minimum), we get:

λ_min = 4λ/2 = 2λ

So, the wavelength of visible light that would have a minimum at the same location on the screen is twice the wavelength of the blue light, or λ_min = 934 nm.

To learn more about double-slit, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28108126

#SPJ11

At its peak, a tornado with a diameter of 66.0 m and wind speeds of 400 km/h has an angular velocity of approximately 0.54 revolutions per second.

1. Convert the wind speed from km/h to m/s:
(400 km/h) * (1000 m/km) / (3600 s/h) = 111.11 m/s

2. Calculate the radius of the tornado:
Radius = Diameter / 2
Radius = 66.0 m / 2 = 33.0 m

3. Determine the linear velocity, which is equal to the wind speed:
Linear velocity (v) = 111.11 m/s

4. Calculate the angular velocity (ω) using the formula ω = v / r:
ω = 111.11 m/s / 33.0 m = 3.37 rad/s

5. Convert the angular velocity from radians per second to revolutions per second:
1 revolution = 2π radians
ω = 3.37 rad/s * (1 rev / 2π rad) ≈ 0.54 rev/s

At its peak, a tornado with a diameter of 66.0 m and wind speeds of 400 km/h has an angular velocity of approximately 0.54 revolutions per second.

To know more about angular velocity, refer

https://brainly.com/question/29342095

#SPJ11

The spring was originally compressed by a distance of 0.105 m.

We can solve this problem using conservation of energy. The potential energy stored in the compressed spring is transformed into kinetic energy of the glider as it moves up the slope, and then back into potential energy as the glider moves back down the slope. Neglecting friction, the total energy of the system is conserved.

The potential energy stored in the compressed spring is given by:

U = (1/2) k x²

where k is the spring constant, x is the distance that the spring is compressed from its equilibrium length, and U is the potential energy.

When the spring is released, the potential energy stored in the spring is transformed into kinetic energy of the glider. At the maximum height, all of the kinetic energy has been converted back into potential energy, so we can write:

(1/2) k x² = m g h

where m is the mass of the glider, g is the acceleration due to gravity, h is the maximum height reached by the glider, and x is the distance that the spring was compressed.

Solving for x, we get:

x = sqrt(2 m g h / k)

Substituting the given values, we get:

x = sqrt(2 × 0.0900 kg × 9.81 m/s² × 1.15 m / 648 N/m) = 0.105 m

Know more about compressed here:

https://brainly.com/question/14828391

#SPJ11

The mass of the ball is determined from its density as 2 kg.

The mass of the is calculated from the product of density of the ball and its volume.

Mass = Volume x Density

the volume of the ball = 0.0020 m³

the density of pure water is 1000 kg/m³

Mass = 0.0020 m³ x 1000 kg/m³

Mass = 2 kg

Thus, the mass of the ball is a function of its density and volume.

Learn more about density here: https://brainly.com/question/6838128

#SPJ1

When the smaller piston moves in a hydraulic system, it applies a greater force compared to the larger piston.

This is because the pressure of the fluid is equal throughout the system, so the force exerted on the smaller piston is spread over a smaller area, resulting in a greater amount of pressure.

The force exerted by the fluid in a hydraulic system is directly proportional to the pressure and the area of the piston. According to Pascal's law, the pressure of a confined fluid is transmitted equally in all directions. Therefore, the pressure acting on the smaller piston is the same as the pressure acting on the larger piston.

However, since the area of the smaller piston is smaller than that of the larger piston, the force exerted on the smaller piston is greater. This is because the pressure is spread over a smaller area, resulting in a higher amount of force. In other words, the force applied by the smaller piston is equal to the force applied by the larger piston, but it is concentrated over a smaller area, resulting in a greater pressure and force.

In a hydraulic system, the fluid applies pressure uniformly throughout the system. According to Pascal's Principle, the pressure applied to one part of the fluid is transmitted equally to all parts of the fluid. As a result, the force exerted by the fluid on the pistons is determined by the product of pressure and the piston's area (F = P × A).

Since the smaller piston has a smaller area, it generates less force compared to the larger piston. However, as the fluid moves through the system and the pistons are connected, the work done on both pistons remains the same (W = F ×d). Due to the smaller force exerted on the smaller piston, it needs to move a greater distance to maintain the same amount of work as the larger piston.

To know more about hydraulic system refer to

https://brainly.com/question/30615986

#SPJ11

The discharge of water in the wood flume for a depth of 1 m is 19 liters per second.

To calculate the discharge of water in the wood flume, we can use the Manning's equation, which relates the flow rate, slope, hydraulic radius, and roughness of the channel. The Manning's equation is:

Q = [tex](1.49/n)A(R^2/3)S^0.5[/tex]

where Q is the flow rate, n is the roughness coefficient, A is the cross-sectional area of the channel, R is the hydraulic radius, and S is the slope of the channel.

Assuming a rectangular cross-section for the wood flume, the cross-sectional area A can be calculated as:

A = depth x width

Assuming a width of 1 meter, the cross-sectional area can be calculated as:

A = 1 m x 1 m = 1 [tex]m^2[/tex]

The hydraulic radius R can be calculated as:

R = A/P

where P is the wetted perimeter of the channel. Assuming the wood flume has vertical walls, the wetted perimeter can be calculated as:

P = 2 x depth + width

P = 2 x 1 m + 1 m = 3 m

Therefore, the hydraulic radius can be calculated as:

R = 1 [tex]m^2[/tex] / 3 m = 0.333 m

The roughness coefficient n depends on the type of channel material and can be estimated from tables. For a planed wood flume, the roughness coefficient can be taken as 0.015.

Finally, plugging in the values for A, R, S, and n into the Manning's equation, we can calculate the flow rate Q:

Q = (1.49/0.015)(1 [tex]m^2[/tex])(0.333[tex]m^(2/3)[/tex])(0.0019[tex])^0.5[/tex]

Q = 0.019 [tex]m^3[/tex]/s or 19 L/s

Therefore, the discharge of water in the wood flume for a depth of 1 m is 19 liters per second.

Learn more about hydraulic

https://brainly.com/question/20876092

#SPJ4

It is unlikely to change the conclusion that dark matter is present in the cluster. A low velocity dispersion may indicate that the cluster lacks sufficient mass to be kept together by gravity

The gravitational lensing effect gives evidence for extra matter that cannot be explained by visible matter alone, & is typically used to infer the existence of dark matter

It seems doubtful that the conclusion that dark matter is present in the cluster would be affected if the velocity dispersion is too low.

This is due to the fact that the measurement of the gravitational lensing effect & that causes light from background objects to bend as it travels through the cluster, is typically used to infer the presence of dark matter in galaxy clusters

The mass of the cluster may be calculated using the observed lensing, & it is frequently discovered that this mass is significantly more than the mass calculated using the velocity dispersion of the individual cluster members

To know more about velocity-

brainly.com/question/30559316

#SPJ4

The magnitude of the magnetic field at the origin is 10 microteslas, assuming a distance of 0.1 meters and 1 ampere current.

The extent of the attractive field at the beginning of a square framed by two wires conveying equivalent size flows can be determined utilizing the Biot-Savart regulation.

As per this regulation, the attractive field delivered by a current-conveying wire at a point in space is relative to the current and the length of the wire and conversely corresponding to the distance between the wire and the point.

To ascertain the greatness of the attractive field at the beginning, we want to find the commitments to the attractive field from each wire and add them together. Since the wires are at the edges of the square, the separation from the beginning to each wire is something similar, and the commitments are equivalent in greatness.

In the event that the ongoing in each wire has a greatness of I, and the separation from the beginning to each wire is r, then the extent of the attractive field at the beginning is:

B = (μ0/4π) × (2I/r)

where μ0 is the porousness of free space, equivalent to 4π × [tex]10^_-7[/tex]T·m/A.

Subsequently, the extent of the attractive field at the beginning is straightforwardly relative to the current and contrarily corresponding to the distance between the wires and the beginning.

Expecting that the wires are put a good ways off of 0.1 meters from the beginning and convey a current of 1 ampere, the size of the attractive field at the beginning can be determined as:

B = (μ0/4π) × (2 × 1 A/0.1 m) = [tex]10^_-5[/tex]T = 10 µT

In this way, the size of the attractive field at the beginning is 10 microteslas.

To learn more about magnetic field, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/29164938

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Calculate the magnitude of the magnetic field at a distance 22.2 cm from a wire carrying a current of 0.857 A Give your answer in units of microtesla. Enter answer here 7.72e-7.

In order to focus an object that is infinitely far away, the lens in a present-day digital camera should be positioned at the focal length of the lens.

This is because the incoming light rays are parallel with the principal axis of the system, and when they pass through the lens, they converge to a point at the focal length. Therefore, positioning the lens at the focal length will allow the image of the distant object to be formed sharply on the CCD chip or film.


In order to focus on an object that is infinitely far away, where the incoming light rays are parallel with the principal axis of the system, the lens should be placed at a distance equal to its focal length from the film or CCD chip. This is because, when the light rays are parallel to the principal axis, they will converge at the focal point of the lens, which is located at the focal length distance from the lens. Therefore, placing the lens at its focal length from the film or CCD chip ensures a clear and focused image.

To know more about lens, refer

https://brainly.com/question/28039799

#SPJ11

According to the theory of special relativity, the measured speed of light is always constant and independent of the motion of the observer.

This is one of the fundamental principles of modern physics and has been extensively tested and confirmed through various experiments. Therefore, in this scenario, the speed of light from the sun would not be affected by the motion of the space shuttle and would always be measured as 300,000 km/s.

                                  Therefore, regardless of the speed of the space shuttle or its direction of travel, the speed of light from the sun would be measured as 300,000 km/s by an observer in the shuttle.
                                      When you're in the space shuttle orbiting Earth at a speed of 7 km/s and traveling straight toward the sun, the speed of light from the sun that you will measure is still 300,000 km/s.

This is because the speed of light in a vacuum is constant, and it doesn't change based on your relative motion. This principle is a fundamental postulate of the theory of relativity, formulated by Albert Einstein. So, even though you're moving toward the sun, the speed of light remains the same at 300,000 km/s.

Learn more about speed of light

brainly.com/question/394103

#SPJ11

The dipole moment, which is a measure of molecular polarity, plays a significant role in determining boiling point due to dipole-dipole interactions. Molecules with higher dipole moments experience stronger dipole-dipole interactions, leading to increased intermolecular forces.

As a result, more energy is required to separate these molecules, causing a higher boiling point.

The dipole moment, or the separation of charges within a molecule, is related to boiling point through dipole-dipole interactions. When molecules have a higher dipole moment, there is a stronger attraction between the positive and negative ends of neighboring molecules.

This attraction requires more energy to overcome, resulting in a higher boiling point. In contrast, molecules with a lower dipole moment have weaker dipole-dipole interactions, requiring less energy to break apart and resulting in a lower boiling point. Therefore, the strength of dipole-dipole interactions, influenced by the dipole moment, is directly related to the boiling point of a substance.

To know more about dipole moment click here:

https://brainly.com/question/16260427

#SPJ11

The water speed in each pipe is approximately 0.023 m/s.

We can use the continuity equation to determine the water speed in each pipe:

A₁v₁ = A₂v₂

where A₁ and A₂ are the cross-sectional areas of the two pipes, and v1 and v₂ are the water speeds in each pipe.

Assuming that the pipes are circular, the cross-sectional area of each pipe can be calculated using the formula for the area of a circle:

A = π[tex]r^2[/tex]

where r is the radius of the pipe. Since the diameter of each pipe is 3.3 m, the radius is 1.65 m.

Therefore, the cross-sectional area of each pipe is:

A = π[tex]r^2[/tex] = π(1.65 m[tex])^2[/tex] = 8.56 [tex]m^2[/tex]

Now, let's assume that the total water flow rate is Q = 800 L/s. This means that each pipe carries half of the total flow rate, or Q/2 = 400 L/s.

To convert the flow rate from liters per second to cubic meters per second, we divide by 1000:

Q = 0.8 [tex]m^3[/tex]/s

Using the continuity equation, we can solve for the water speed in each pipe:

A₁v₁ = A₂v₂

8.56 [tex]m^2[/tex] × v = 8.56 [tex]m^2[/tex] × v₂

v₁ = v₂

Q/2A₁  = Q/2A₂

v₁ = v₂ = Q/2A₁= Q/2A₂

v₁ = v2 = (0.8 [tex]m^3/s[/tex]) / (2 × 8.56[tex]m^2)[/tex]

v₁ = v2 = 0.023 m/s

Therefore, the water speed in each pipe is approximately 0.023 m/s.

Learn more about cross-sectional areas

https://brainly.com/question/20532494

#SPJ4

Answer:

1/2 m v^2 = G M m / R         speed of object at surface of earth

v^2 = 2 G M / R        escape speed needed

V = 3 v     if original speed = 3 * escape speed

v^2 / 9 = 2 G M / R

v^2 = 18 G M / R    where v is initial speed

v^2 = G M / R  * (18 - 2) = 16 G M / R     very far from earth

v = (16 G M / R)^1/2

v = (16 * 6.67E-11 * 5.98E24 / 6.37E6)^1/2

v = 31650 m/s = 19.7 mi/sec

When a particle is projected from the surface of Earth with a speed equal to 3 times the escape speed, its final speed when very far from Earth will be 2 times the escape speed.

The escape speed is the minimum speed required for an object to overcome Earth's gravitational pull and move indefinitely away from it.

When a particle is projected with a speed 3 times the escape speed, it has more than enough energy to escape Earth's gravity.

As the particle moves away from Earth, it loses some of its kinetic energy due to Earth's gravitational force. Eventually, when the particle is very far from Earth, it will have lost an amount of kinetic energy equal to the escape speed.

Summary: When a particle is projected with a speed 3 times the escape speed and reaches a point very far from Earth, its speed will be 2 times the escape speed.

Learn more about speed click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13943409

#SPJ11

When loading a trailer, more than half the weight should be placed in the back half of the trailer. The given statement is false.

When loading a trailer, more than half of the weight should actually be placed in the front half of the trailer, not the back half. This helps to maintain stability and control while towing the trailer.

Ideally, 60% of the weight should be placed towards the front half, with the remaining 40% distributed towards the back half.
In order to ensure proper weight distribution and trailer stability, it is essential to place more than half of the load weight in the front half of the trailer, rather than the back half.

For more information on weight distribution kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/31606887

#SPJ11

Answer:

lateral view

Explanation:

In the anteroposterior (AP) view, the x-ray beam passes from one side of the body to the opposite side.

In this view, the x-ray source is positioned in front of the patient, and the beam travels through the body from anterior (front) to posterior (back), capturing the desired images. In this view, the x-ray beam is directed from one side of the body to the opposite side, passing through the body in a horizontal plane. This view allows for an image to be produced of the body which is perpendicular to the beam, allowing for a clear image of the body in a cross-section. This is beneficial for capturing images of the internal organs and structures, such as the skeleton, which are not visible from the surface.

To learn more about x-ray click here https://brainly.com/question/23281551

#SPJ11

If the spring constant for a spring-mass system undergoing simple harmonic motion is doubled, and the total energy remains unchanged, the maximum amplitude of the oscillation will decrease.



When the spring constant is doubled, the frequency of the system increases, as given by the formula:

f = (1/2π) * √(k/m)

where f is the frequency, k is the spring constant, and m is the mass.

Since the total energy of the system remains unchanged, the amplitude must decrease to compensate for the increase in frequency. This can be understood by considering the conservation of energy principle:

E = (1/2) * k * A^2

where E is the total energy, k is the spring constant, and A is the amplitude.

If the spring constant doubles, and the energy remains the same, the amplitude must decrease by a factor of 1/sqrt(2), or approximately 0.707.

Therefore, the maximum amplitude of the oscillation will decrease if the spring constant is doubled and the total energy remains unchanged, assuming that the system is underdamped.

learn more about spring constant

https://brainly.com/question/23885190

#SPJ11

The minimum position of the particle is at a point where its potential energy is a minimum (greater than -7 J), and the maximum position of the particle is at a point where its potential energy is a maximum (-7 J).

We need to use the conservation of mechanical energy, which states that the total mechanical energy of a particle remains constant throughout its motion. The total mechanical energy (E) of a particle is the sum of its kinetic energy (K) and potential energy (U):

[tex]E = K + U[/tex]

Since the problem states that the total mechanical energy of the particle is -7 J, we can write:

[tex]-7 J = K + U[/tex]

The minimum and maximum positions of the particle correspond to the points where its kinetic energy is zero (since the particle briefly stops at these points) and its potential energy is at a maximum or minimum.

At the maximum position, the potential energy is at a maximum, and the kinetic energy is zero. Therefore, we have:

[tex]U_max = -7 J and K_max = 0[/tex]

At the minimum position, the potential energy is at a minimum (which is greater than -7 J), and the kinetic energy is again zero. Therefore, we have:

[tex]U_min > -7 J and K_min = 0[/tex]

We cannot determine the exact value of [tex]U_min[/tex] from the given information, but we know that it must be greater than -7 J.

So, the minimum position of the particle is the point where its potential energy is at a minimum, and its kinetic energy is zero. The maximum position of the particle is the point where its potential energy is at a maximum, and its kinetic energy is zero.

Therefore, we can say that the minimum position of the particle is at a point where its potential energy is a minimum (greater than -7 J), and the maximum position of the particle is at a point where its potential energy is a maximum (-7 J).

Learn more about conservation of mechanical energy

brainly.com/question/11264649

#SPJ11

The current flows through a 10 Ω resistor which is connected to 3V battery is = 0.3 A

you can use Ohm's Law,( I = V/R) which states that the current (I) is equal to the voltage (V) divided by the resistance (R).

1: Identify the known values
Resistance (R) = 10 Ω
Voltage (V) = 3 V

2: Use Ohm's Law to calculate the current (I)
I = V / R

3: Plug in the known values
I = 3 V / 10 Ω

Step 4: Solve for the current (I)
I = 0.3 A

The current that flows through a 10 Ω resistor when it is connected to a battery of 3 V is 0.3 A (Amperes).

To learn more about  current visit:   https://brainly.com/question/1100341

#SPJ11

The ratio of average velocity u to centerline velocity uc is 0.7216 or approximately 0.72.

The average velocity can be calculated using the formula:

[tex]u = (1/A)∫(0 to R) 2πrv dr ∫(0 to 1) (R-r)/R (R-r)/R^6 du[/tex]

where A is the cross-sectional area of the pipe.

Solving the inner integral first:

[tex]∫(0 to 1) (R-r)/R (R-r)/R^6 du = (1/R^5) ∫(0 to 1) (R-r)^2 du\\= (1/R^5) [(R-r)^3/3] from 0 to 1\\= (2/3R^5)(R-r)^3[/tex]

Now, substituting this in the formula for u and solving the outer integral:

[tex]u = (1/A)∫(0 to R) 2πrv dr ∫(0 to 1) (R-r)/R (R-r)/R^6 du\\= (1/A)∫(0 to R) 2πrv (2/3R^5)(R-r)^3 dr\\= (4/3AR^4) ∫(0 to R) (R-r)^3 v dr[/tex]

We can use the power law velocity distribution to express v in terms of uc:

[tex]v = uc (r/R)^(1/7)[/tex]

Therefore, substituting for v in the above equation:

[tex]u = (4/3AR^4) ∫(0 to R) (R-r)^3 uc (r/R)^(1/7) dr[/tex]

Integrating this expression is not straightforward, so we can use a numerical method to evaluate it. Using the trapezoidal rule with 100 intervals, we obtain:

u = 0.7216 uc

The ratio of average velocity u to centerline velocity uc is 0.7216 or approximately 0.72.

To know more about average velocity refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/862972

#SPJ11

Answer: The man does not move at all before colliding with the woman, since they were already 12.0 m apart and on frictionless ice.

Explanation:

To solve this problem, we need to use the law of conservation of momentum, which states that the total momentum of an isolated system remains constant.We can assume that the man and woman are initially at rest, so their total momentum is zero. When they collide, their total momentum will still be zero, but it will have been transferred between them.

Let's use the subscripts "m" and "w" to represent the man and woman, respectively. The momentum of each person can be calculated using the formula:

p = m*v

where p is the momentum, m is the mass, and v is the velocity.

Initially, both the man and woman have zero momentum, so:

p_m,i = 0

p_w,i = 0

After the collision, the total momentum is still zero, so:

p_m,f + p_w,f = 0

where p_m,f and p_w,f are the final momenta of the man and woman, respectively.

We can use the conservation of momentum equation to solve for the final velocity of the man:

p_m,f = -p_w,f

m_mv_m,f = -m_wv_w,f

v_m,f = -m_w/m_m * v_w,f

where v_m,f and v_w,f are the final velocities of the man and woman, respectively.

To find the distance the man has moved, we need to know how long it takes for him to collide with the woman. We can use the formula:

d = v_avg * t

where d is the distance, v_avg is the average velocity, and t is the time.

The average velocity can be calculated as:

v_avg = (v_m,f + v_w,f)/2

Substituting the expressions we derived earlier, we get:

v_avg = (-m_w/m_m * v_w,f + v_w,f)/2

v_avg = (-m_w/m_m + 1)/2 * v_w,f

Now we can solve for the time it takes for the man to collide with the woman:

t = d/v_avg

Substituting the given values, we get:

t = 12.0 m / [(-82 kg/51 kg + 1)/2 * 0 m/s]

t = -6.75 s

The negative sign means that our assumption that the man and woman were initially at rest was incorrect. In reality, they must have been moving towards each other before the collision. However, we can ignore the sign and take the absolute value of the time, which gives us:

t = 6.75 s

Finally, we can use the formula for distance to find how far the man has moved:

d = v_avg * t

Substituting the values we calculated, we get:

d = [(-82 kg/51 kg + 1)/2 * 0 m/s + 0 m/s]/2 * 6.75 s

d = 0 m

Therefore, the man does not move at all before colliding with the woman, since they were already 12.0 m apart and on frictionless ice.

To know more about collision problems, refer to this link-https://brainly.com/question/31775890

#SPJ11

A light crosswind can have a significant effect on the wingtip vortices generated by a large airplane during takeoff.

The vortices, which are essentially swirling masses of air, are created by the difference in pressure between the upper and lower surfaces of the wings. In a crosswind situation, the wind can cause the vortices to drift away from the centerline of the runway, potentially affecting other aircraft that are taking off or landing on nearby runways. Pilots are trained to be aware of this phenomenon and adjust their takeoff and landing procedures accordingly to avoid encountering or being affected by the wingtip vortices of other aircraft.
The effect of a light crosswind on the wingtip vortices generated by a large airplane that has just taken off can be summarized as follows:

1. A light crosswind will cause the wingtip vortices to be pushed in the direction of the crosswind.
2. This may lead to an increased distance between the vortices, reducing the chance of a smaller aircraft encountering them.
3. However, it could also cause the vortices to drift towards nearby taxiways or runways, potentially affecting other aircraft on the ground or during takeoff.
In summary, a light crosswind can affect the position and distribution of wingtip vortices generated by a large airplane that has just taken off, potentially influencing the safety of other aircraft in the vicinity.

Visit here to learn more about wingtip vortices:

brainly.com/question/31432978

#SPJ11

Based on the given information, we know that there is an unknown planet with two moons in circular orbits. The table provides hypothetical data about the moons, which we can use to make calculations. To start, we need to look at the table and see what information is given. We have the masses of both moons (m1 and m2), as well as their distances from the planet (r1 and r2). We also have the gravitational constant, which is g = 6.67 × 10^-11 nm^2/kg^2.

Using this information, we can calculate the gravitational force between each moon and the planet using the formula F = G(m1m2)/r^2, where G is the gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the masses of the moons, and r is the distance between the moon and the planet. Let's start by calculating the gravitational force between the first moon and the planet. We have m1 = 8.0 x 10^22 kg and r1 = 4.0 x 10^5 nm. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:
F1 = (6.67 x 10^-11)(8.0 x 10^22)(5.0 x 10^5)^2
F1 = 1.34 x 10^32 N
Now, let's calculate the gravitational force between the second moon and the planet. We have m2 = 5.0 x 10^22 kg and r2 = 3.0 x 10^5 nm. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:
F2 = (6.67 x 10^-11)(8.0 x 10^22)(4.0 x 10^5)^2
F2 = 4.45 x 10^31 N

Next, we can use the gravitational forces to calculate the orbital velocities of the moons. We can do this using the formula v = (GM/r)^0.5, where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the planet, and r is the distance between the moon and the planet. To calculate the orbital velocity of the first moon, we need to know the mass of the planet. Unfortunately, this information is not given in the table, so we can't make this calculation. However, we can still calculate the orbital velocity of the second moon. Let's assume that the mass of the planet is 5.0x 10^24 kg (which is roughly the mass of Earth). Plugging in the values for F2, G, and r2, we get:
v2 = (GM/r2)^0.5
v2 = ((6.67 x 10^-11)(5.0 x 10^24)/(3.0 x 10^5))^0.5
v2 = 1.98 x 10^3 m/s
So the orbital velocity of the second moon is approximately 1.98 x 10^3 m/s.
Overall, without knowing the mass of the planet, we cannot fully determine the orbital velocities of both moons. However, we were able to calculate the gravitational forces between the planet and each moon using the given data in the table.

To know more about circular orbits visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29679142

#SPJ11

The velocity of a rotating object and the centripetal force exerted on it are directly proportional. This means that as the velocity of a rotating object increases, the centripetal force required to keep it moving in a circular path also increases.

Centripetal force is a type of force that causes an object to move in a circular path or a curved trajectory. It acts inwards towards the center of the circle and is always perpendicular to the object's velocity. This force is responsible for keeping an object moving in a circle and preventing it from moving in a straight line.

The magnitude of the centripetal force depends on the mass of the object, its velocity, and the radius of the circle. The greater the mass and velocity of the object, or the smaller the radius of the circle, the greater the centripetal force required to keep the object moving in a circular path. Some examples of centripetal force include the force that keeps a planet in orbit around the sun, the force that keeps a car moving around a banked curve, and the force that keeps a rollercoaster moving in a loop.

To learn more about Centripetal force visit here:

brainly.com/question/11324711

#SPJ4

No, Fromia monilis cells cannot make their own food.

As they are not photosynthetic organisms and do not possess the necessary chloroplasts or pigments for photosynthesis. Fromia monilis is a species of starfish that feeds on algae, small organisms, and detritus present in its environment. The starfish uses its tube feet to capture and manipulate food items towards its mouth located on the underside of its central disc. Like most animals, Fromia monilis relies on external sources of food and cannot produce its own through photosynthesis or other means.

To know more about food, here

brainly.com/question/16327379

#SPJ1

Approximately 16.3 grams of gold will be produced when 17.0 amperes of current are passed through a gold solution for 49.0 minutes.

We need to use Faraday's law of electrolysis, which states that the amount of substance produced at an electrode is directly proportional to the amount of electric charge that passes through the electrode.

The formula we will use is:

mass = (Q × M) / (n × F)

where:

- Q is the electric charge passed through the solution, measured in coulombs (C)

- M is the molar mass of the substance, measured in grams per mole (g/mol)

- n is the number of electrons transferred in the reaction (this is called the "stoichiometric coefficient")

- F is the Faraday constant, which is equal to 96,485 C/mol.

First, we need to determine the electric charge passed through the solution. We can use the formula:

Q = I × t

where:

- I is the current, measured in amperes (A)

- t is the time, measured in seconds (s)

Converting the given values into SI units, we get:

I = 17.0 A

t = 49.0 min × 60 s/min = 2940 s

So:

Q = I × t = 17.0 A × 2940 s = 49980 C

Next, we need to determine the molar mass of gold. The atomic weight of gold is 196.97 g/mol, so:

M = 196.97 g/mol

Finally, we need to determine the stoichiometric coefficient and the number of electrons transferred in the reaction. Without additional information, we will assume that the reaction is:

Au3+ + 3e- → Au

This means that the stoichiometric coefficient is 3, and three electrons are transferred for each gold atom produced.

Substituting the values into the formula, we get:

mass = (Q × M) / (n × F)

     = (49980 C × 196.97 g/mol) / (3 × 96,485 C/mol)

     = 16.3 g

Approximately 16.3 grams of gold will be produced when 17.0 amperes of current are passed through a gold solution for 49.0 minutes.

Learn more about Current passed from gold

brainly.com/question/19525085

#SPJ11