WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE BEST ANSWER!!

Answer:

With Copernicus's circular orbits Planets were not obeying the correct movements.. They did not match the observations.So Kepler found a solution. That the orbits were elliptical.

Johannes Kepler had more accurate information about the movement of the planets than Ptolemy because he relied on the observations.

Observations of his mentor, Tycho Brahe, who had made more accurate and detailed observations of the planets than anyone before him.

Brahe had spent over 20 years meticulously observing the positions of the planets using large, precise instruments and recording his observations in great detail. Kepler used this data to develop his laws of planetary motion, which accurately described the motion of the planets around the sun in a way that Ptolemy's geocentric model could not.

Ptolemy's model, which had been the dominant theory for over a thousand years, was based on the assumption that the earth was the center of the universe and all the planets moved in perfect circles around it.

Kepler's laws, in contrast, showed that the planets moved in elliptical orbits around the sun, and his work laid the foundation for the development of modern astronomy.

Learn more about ptolemy here

https://brainly.com/question/4270848

#SPJ2

The most common maps that people are familiar with are versions of the Mercator Projection Map. Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator created this map in 1569. Originally intended solely for ocean navigation, the map has found its way into the classrooms of many western schools including those in the United States. The Mercator Projection has many flaws and it is a prime example of how map bias can shape one’s world view.

As Gauss’ Theorem Egregium proved, it is mathematically impossible to translate a sphere onto a 2D plane without creating distortions in either the shape, size, distance or direction of points on that sphere. That is why creating maps of the world is so tricky. However, Mercator’s map is particularly flawed, and it is especially problematic when teaching young children basic geography.

The map compromises accurate landmass size in favor of accurate direction, in the hopes of being a better tool for navigation. By the north and south poles, landmasses are stretch beyond proportion while at the equator, countries shrink.

For example, the map shows Greenland as roughly the same size as the entire continent of Africa. However, in actuality, Africa is 14 times larger than Greenland. The European continent seems to be as large as South America when South America should really be twice its size. According to the Mercator map, the equator should run through Florida, not Indonesia, Brazil and the Congo. Additionally, the state of Alaska appears massive on the Mercator Projection, seemingly the size of half of the contiguous United States. However, its landmass is actually smaller than that of Mexico.

The Mercator Projection Map is the type of map that most people are familiar with. In 1569, the Flemish geographer Gerardus Mercator produced this map.

The term map is having been described as they have a scale in It's as we call the longitude and latitude as well as we see there are different types of things are being different things are also in it as we see there are different things are being there in it as we see the oceans are there the roads and in it.

The chart, which was created specifically for ocean navigation, has made its way into many western schools, including those in the United States. The Mercator Projection has a lot of shortcomings and is a good illustration of how one's worldview can be influenced by map bias.

The Mercator Projection has a lot of problems and is a great illustration of how bias towards maps may affect how one sees the world.

Therefore, This map was created by Flemish geographer Gerardus Mercator.

Learn more about the map here:

https://brainly.com/question/1565784

#SPJ2

Answer:

this is your answer hope this helps you