which of the following statements are false? question 20 options: a starburst galaxy undergoes faster production of stars a starburst galaxy will be dimmer than normal elliptical galaxies are more likely to be found near the edges of dense star clusters spiral galaxies are more likely to be near the middle of dense star clusters measuring the amount of helium in the universe allows us to estimate the density of the universe that is contributed by normal matter hydrogen and helium in interstellar and intergalactic space make up about 4 % of the mass required to reach critical density.

a. Since the height of the water in the pipe is 2.5 m and the radius of the pipe is 2 cm, Net force is 12,250,000 N,

b. Work is 1,176,000 J and c. speed = 20,000 m/s

d. The speed of the water flow in the second section of the pipe can be calculated as: 250 m/s.

a) The net force on the bottom of the pool can be calculated as the weight of the water being drained multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity:

Net force = (mass of water being drained) * g

The mass of water being drained can be calculated using the volume of the pool and the density of water:

mass of water = volume of water / density of water

The volume of water can be calculated using the formula for the volume of a rectangular prism:

volume = length * width * height

volume = 50 m * 2.5 m = 125 m

mass of water = 125 m * 1000 kg/m = 125,000 kg

Net force = (125,000 kg) * 9.8 m/s = 12,250,000 N

b) The work done by the pump can be calculated as the product of the force applied by the pump and the distance over which the force is applied:

Work = force * distance

The force applied by the pump can be calculated as the pressure of the water multiplied by the area of the pipes:

force = pressure * area

The pressure of the water can be calculated as the head of water multiplied by the density of water and the acceleration due to gravity:

pressure = head * density * g

The area of the pipes can be calculated as the radius of the pipes squared multiplied by the length of the pipes:

area =  [tex]r^2[/tex] * L

force = (h * 1000 kg/m) * (4 cm)* 9.8 m/s^2 = 23,520 N

distance = 50 m

Work = force * distance = 23,520 N * 50 m = 1,176,000 J

c) The speed of the water flow in the submerged pipes can be calculated as the product of the volume of the water flow and the density of water:

speed = volume * density

The volume of the water flow can be calculated as the product of the cross-sectional area of the pipes and the height of the water in the pipes:

volume = cross-sectional area * height

The cross-sectional area of the pipes can be calculated as the radius of the pipes squared multiplied by the length of the pipes:

cross-sectional area = [tex]r^2[/tex] * L

cross-sectional area = (4 cm) * 50 m = 200 cm

speed = 200 cm * density

Since the density of water is approximately 1000 kg/m^3, the speed of the water flow in the submerged pipes can be calculated as:

speed = 200 cm * 1000 kg/m

= 20,000 kg/s

= 20,000 m/s

= 20,000 m/s = 20,000 m/s

d) The speed of the water flow in the second section of the pipe placed on the ground can be calculated as the product of the cross-sectional area of the pipe and the height of the water in the pipe:

speed = cross-sectional area * height

here cross-sectional area is the cross-sectional area of the pipe and height is the height of the water in the pipe.

The cross-sectional area of the pipe can be calculated as the radius of the pipe squared multiplied by the length of the pipe:

cross-sectional area = [tex]r^2[/tex] * L

here r is the radius of the pipe and L is the length of the pipe.

cross-sectional area = (2 cm) * 50 cm = 100 cm

speed = 100 cm * height

Since the height of the water in the pipe is 2.5 m and the radius of the pipe is 2 cm, the speed of the water flow in the second section of the pipe can be calculated as:

speed = 100 cm * 2.5 m

= 250 m/s = 250 m/s

= 250 m/s  

Learn more about radius Visit: brainly.com/question/29614115

#SPJ4

a. The speed of the block and bullet immediately after impact is √(5/3) * v_0.

b. The kinetic energy of the block and bullet, when they reach point P on the loop, is (7/10) * m * g * r.

c. The minimum initial speed v_min of the bullet, if the block and bullet are to successfully execute a complete circuit of the loop, is √(5/2) * √g * r.

a. Initially, the block is at rest, and the bullet strikes it horizontally with a speed of v_0. As the bullet is embedded in the block, the system of block and bullet has a mass of 3m. The minimum speed required at the topmost point of the loop for the system to remain in contact with the track is √(5/3) * v_0. Therefore, the speed of the block and bullet immediately after impact is √(5/3) * v_0.

b. At the topmost point P of the loop, the block and bullet will have a centripetal acceleration equal to g, which is the acceleration due to gravity. The net force acting on the block and bullet is equal to the centripetal force, which is given by (3m) * g. Therefore, the kinetic energy of the system at point P is (7/10) * m * g * r.

c. To successfully execute a complete circuit of the loop, the speed of the system at the topmost point of the loop should be at least equal to √(5/2) * √g * r. Therefore, the minimum initial speed v_min of the bullet required is √(5/2) * √g * r.

To know more about kinetic energy refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/26472013#

#SPJ11

No, the evidence for dark matter is too strong to think it could be in error.

While there is still much to learn about this mysterious substance, its existence has been supported by multiple independent lines of observational evidence, including the dynamics of galaxies and galaxy clusters, the cosmic microwave background radiation, and gravitational lensing. While it's possible that our current understanding of gravity may need to be refined, it's highly unlikely that all of the evidence for dark matter is the result of errors or biases in our observations. Therefore, while it is possible that there could be something wrong with our current understanding of how gravity should work on large scales, and that dark matter may not exist, the evidence for it is too strong to think it could be in error.

To learn more about dark matter click here https://brainly.com/question/29480686

#SPJ11

The weight of the block on the moon is calculated as 12.47 N.

To find the weight of the block on the moon, we need to first determine its mass. We can do this using the formula F = ma, where F is the force applied, m is the mass of the block, and a is the acceleration.

Given, on the Earth, block accelerates at 2.40 m/s2 when 18.5 N horizontal force is applied. So,

18.5 N = m x 2.40 m/s2

Solving for m, we get:

m = 7.71 kg

Now that we know the mass of the block, we can use the formula for weight:

On the moon, as the acceleration due to gravity is 1.62 m/s2, so

So, weight = 7.71 kg x 1.62 m/s2

Weight = 12.47 N

Therefore, the weight of the block on the moon is 12.47 N.

To know more about weight, refer

https://brainly.com/question/86444

#SPJ11

voltmeter. A voltmeter measures the voltage of the electrical system in the vehicle, which includes the alternator. If the voltage is too high or too low, it can indicate an issue with the alternator. An ammeter measures the flow of electrical current, a tachometer measures engine speed, and pumping the engine throttle

voltmeter. A voltmeter measures the voltage of the electrical system in the vehicle, which includes the alternator. If the voltage is too high or too low, it can indicate an issue with the alternator. An ammeter measures the flow of electrical current, a tachometer measures engine speed, and pumping the engine throttle does not provide information about the alternator status.
The main answer to your question about which instrument indicates the status of a vehicle's alternator is: b. voltmeter.

A voltmeter measures the voltage across the terminals of the alternator, which helps determine its proper functioning. An ammeter measures current, a tachometer measures engine speed, and pumping the engine throttle is an action, not an instrument. Therefore, the voltmeter is the correct choice for assessing the status of the vehicle's alternator.

To know more about tachometer , visit

https://brainly.com/question/20355034

#SPJ11

The answer to part (a) is (E) 7.7.

The answer to part (c) is (A) 3.6.

The answer to part (d) is (A) 1.2.

R = V/I = 120 V/8.0 A = 15 Ω

P = I^2 R = (8.0 A)^2 × 15 Ω = 960 W

E = P × t = 960 W × 8.0 h = 7680 Wh = 7.68 kWh

To find the drift speed:

v = I/(nAq)

n = (ρ/M) × N_A

v = I/(nAq) = (8.0 A)/(5.99 × 10^28/m^3 × 8.04 × 10^-8 m^2 × 1.6 × 10^-19 C) = 3.64 × 10^-5 m/s

To find the change in resistivity:

Δρ = αρΔT

ρ = ρ_20(1 + αΔT)

Δρ = αρΔT = 3.9 × 10^-3/°C × 1.62 × 10^-8 Ω·m × (3 × 20°C) = 1.18 × 10^-10 Ω·m

Therefore, the answer to part (a), (c), (d) is (E)7.7 ,(A)3.6, (A) 1.2.

To know more about drift speed ,change in resistivity refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2285172

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the force between two parallel wires the answer is A. 0.078 N.

We can use the equation: to calculate the strength of the force between two parallel wires.

F = (μ₀ * I₁ * I₂ * L) / (2πd)

F is the force, 0 is the permeability of empty space (4 x 10-7 N/A2), I1 and I2 are the currents flowing through the wires, L is the length of the wires, and d is the separation between them.

By entering the specified values, we obtain:

F = (2 * 0.044 m) / (4 x 10-7 N/A2) * (4.4 A) * (4.4 A) * (4.4 A) * (41 m)

When we condense this expression, we get:

F equals (roughly) 0.078 N.

As a result, the response is A. 0.078 N.

To know more about magnitude click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30881682

#SPJ11

The x coordinate of the object is -16 cm for a lens placed at the origin with its axis pointing along the x-axis producing a real inverted image at x= 24cm that is twice as tall as the object.

We can use the thin lens equation to solve for the distance of the object from the lens. Let's let the focal length of the lens be f. Since the image is real and inverted, the image distance is negative and the magnification is negative, so:

1/f = 1/di - 1/do

m = -di/do

where f is the focal length, di is the image distance, do is the object distance, and m is the magnification.

Since the image is twice as tall as the object, we know that m = -2. We also know that the image is located at x = 24 cm. Therefore, di = -24 cm.

Plugging in these values, we can solve for do:

-2 = -24/do - 1/f

We don't know f, but we do know that the lens is converging since it produces a real image. Therefore, f is positive. Since we're looking for the x-coordinate of the object, we only need to solve for do. Rearranging the equation, we get:

do = -24/(2 + 1/f)

Now we just need to solve for f. Since the image is inverted, the lens must be converging. Therefore, f is positive. We can use the fact that the magnification is negative to solve for f:

m = -di/do = f/(do - f)

-2 = f/(-24/(2+f) - f)

Multiplying both sides by (-24/(2+f) - f), we get:

-2(-24/(2+f) - f) = f

48 + 2f = -f²

Rearranging and factoring, we get:

f² + 2f - 48 = 0

Solving for f, we find that f = 6 cm. Now we can use the equation for doing that we derived earlier:

do = -24/(2 + 1/f) = -24/(2 + 1/6) = -16 cm

Therefore, the x-coordinate of the object is -16 cm.

Learn more about the real image at

https://brainly.com/question/3359672

#SPJ4

The question is -

A lens placed at the origin with its axis pointing along the x-axis produces a real inverted image at x= 24cm that is twice as tall as the object. What is the x coordinate of the object? Keep in mind that a real image and a real object should be on opposite sides of the lens.

the peak current is 919.1 A. Peak current is the max current during one cycle, determined by voltage and inductive reactance.

Part A:
To find the voltage across the inductor at t=0.10s, we need to substitute t=0.10s into the given equation:
vL = (25 V) cos(60t)
vL = (25 V) cos(60 x 0.10)
vL = (25 V) cos(6)
vL = -12.5 V
Therefore, the voltage across the inductor at t=0.10s is -12.5 V.

Part B:
The inductive reactance, XL, is given by the equation:
XL = 2πfL
where f is the frequency and L is the inductance. In this case, the inductance is 72 μH (microhenries) and the frequency is 60 Hz (given by the cosine function).
XL = 2π x 60 x 72 x 10^-6
XL = 0.0272 Ω
Therefore, the inductive reactance is 0.0272 Ω.

Part C:
The peak current, I, can be found using the formula:
I = Vpeak / XL

where Vpeak is the peak voltage, which is equal to the maximum voltage of the cosine function, which is 25 V.
I = 25 V / 0.0272 Ω
I = 919.1 A
Therefore, the peak current is 919.1 A.

To know more about Peak current visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31857951

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the train is 10.6 m/s, and its direction is 30° below the horizontal (to the east).

Given:

Velocity of the train (Vt) = 12.0 m/s eastward

Angle made by raindrops with vertical (θ) = 30.0°

Part A:

Horizontal component of the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the earth is the same as the horizontal component of the velocity of the train, i.e., 12.0 m/s eastward.

Part B:

Let Vr be the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the train, and Vh be its horizontal component. Since the angle made by the raindrops with vertical is 30°, the angle made by the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the train with horizontal is also 30°. Therefore:

sin(30°) = Vh / Vr

0.5 = Vh / Vr

Vh = 0.5 Vr

The horizontal component of the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the train is half of its magnitude, i.e., Vh = 0.5 Vr.

Part C:

Let Vre be the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the earth, and Vv be its vertical component. Since the raindrops are falling vertically with respect to the earth, Vv = -9.8 m/s (assuming downward is positive). Using the angle made by the raindrops with vertical, we can find the magnitude of the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the earth:

sin(30°) = Vv / Vre

0.5 = -9.8 / Vre

Vre = -19.6 m/s

The magnitude of the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the earth is , 19.6 m/s and its direction is 30° below the horizontal (to the east).

Part D:

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can find the magnitude of the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the train:

[tex]Vr^2 = Vh^2 + Vv^2[/tex]

Substituting Vh = 0.5 Vr and Vv = -9.8 m/s, we get:

[tex]Vr^2 = (0.5 Vr)^2 + (-9.8 m/s)^2[/tex]

Solving for Vr, we get:

Vr = 10.6 m/s

The magnitude of the velocity of the raindrop with respect to the train is 10.6 m/s, and its direction is 30° below the horizontal (to the east).

To know more about velocity  refer here

brainly.com/question/17127206#

#SPJ11

The forward voltage at which the diode current is equal to 1.00 mA is approximately 0.62 V.

To calculate the forward voltage at which the diode current is equal to 1.00 mA, we need to use the following equation:

J = J0 * (exp(qV/kT) - 1)

where J is the diode current, J0 is the reverse saturation current, q is the charge of an electron, V is the forward voltage, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin.

We can rewrite the above equation as:

V = (kT/q) * ln(J/J0 + 1)

Given that the diode area is A = 1.0x10⁴ cm², the diode current at Vse = 0 is:

J0 = AR * A * T² * exp(-qose/kT) = 7.6x10⁵ A/cm² * 1.0x10⁴ cm² * (300 K)² * exp(-q0.80 eV/kT) = 3.68x10⁻⁹ A

Substituting J = 1.00 mA = 1.00x10⁻³ A, we can solve for the forward voltage:

V = (kT/q) * ln(J/J0 + 1) = (1.38x10⁻²³ J/K * 300 K / 1.60x10⁻¹⁹ C) * ln(1.00x10^⁻³A / 3.68x10⁻⁹ A + 1) = 0.62 V

To know more about voltage click here

brainly.com/question/2364325

#SPJ11

The jets of matter that we see traveling outward from the galaxy in a double-lobed radio source originate from the central engine, which is a supermassive black hole that is actively accreting matter from an accretion disk.

As matter falls towards the black hole, it becomes heated and energized, and some of it is ejected along the poles of the black hole as powerful jets of plasma. These jets can travel vast distances through the intergalactic medium, creating the characteristic radio lobes that we observe in these sources. So, in short, the jets of matter come directly from the central engine of the radio source itself.

To know more about  central engine visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/9760999

#SPJ11

(a) The angular magnification of a microscope is given by the formula:

M = (-)fo / fe

where fo is the focal length of the objective lens, and fe is the focal length of the eyepiece.

Substituting the given values, we get:

M = (-)(5.00 mm) / (26.0 mm) = -0.192

The negative sign indicates that the image is inverted.

Therefore, the angular magnification of the microscope is 0.192.

(b) The minimum separation that can be resolved by a microscope is given by the formula:

dmin = 1.22 * λ / (2 * NA)

where λ is the wavelength of light, and NA is the numerical aperture of the objective lens.

Since the problem does not provide any information about the wavelength of light, we assume it to be the green light with a wavelength of 550 nm. The numerical aperture of the objective lens is not given, but typically it is between 0.1 and 1 for microscopes. Assuming an NA of 0.25, we get:

dmin = 1.22 * (550 nm) / (2 * 0.25) = 1.35 μm

Therefore, the minimum separation that can be resolved by this microscope is 1.35 micrometers, which is much smaller than the minimum separation that can be resolved by the unaided eye.

To know more about wavelength

brainly.com/question/31143857

#SPJ11

At a speed of 20 km/s, it would take the Sun's planetary nebula approximately 7.14 years to reach Neptune's orbit and about 63,442 years to reach the nearest star, Proxima Centauri.

To answer the question, we first need to determine the distances involved. The average distance from the Sun to Neptune is about 4.5 billion kilometers (30.1 astronomical units). The nearest star to the Sun is Proxima Centauri, which is approximately 4.24 light-years away, or about 40 trillion kilometers.

To reach Neptune's orbit, we can use the formula time = distance/speed:
Time = (4.5 billion km) / (20 km/s) ≈ 225 million seconds
Converting to years: 225 million seconds / (60 s/min * 60 min/h * 24 h/day * 365.25 days/year) ≈ 7.14 years

To reach Proxima Centauri:
Time = (40 trillion km) / (20 km/s) ≈ 2 trillion seconds
Converting to years: 2 trillion seconds / (60 s/min * 60 min/h * 24 h/day * 365.25 days/year) ≈ 63,442 years

So, it would take the Sun's planetary nebula approximately 7.14 years to reach Neptune's orbit and about 63,442 years to reach the nearest star, Proxima Centauri, at a speed of 20 km/s.

More on nebula and Neptune: https://brainly.com/question/29242780

#SPJ11

The Big Bang Theory is a scientific theory that explains the origins of the universe. It states that the universe started with a massive explosion, approximately 13.8 billion years ago.

The explosion sent matter and energy out into space, where it formed into galaxies, stars, and planets. As a result, the universe has been expanding ever since. To answer your question, the most likely pair of diagrams that a scientist would see if the Big Bang Theory is correct is the pair where the distance between the galaxies is increasing.

This is because the theory suggests that the universe is constantly expanding, and this expansion can be observed by measuring the distances between galaxies. The other pairs of diagrams would show either static or decreasing distances between galaxies, which would contradict the Big Bang Theory. Thus, the pair of diagrams that shows an increasing distance between galaxies is the most likely to be observed by a scientist if the Big Bang Theory is correct.

Learn more about Big Bang Theory here:

brainly.com/question/15421576

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the point charge is 2.2 nano coulombs. The magnitude of the point charge is 12 pico coulombs.

A. To find the magnitude of the point charge, we can use the formula for the electric field created by a point charge:

E = k*q/r²

Rearranging the formula, we get:

q = E*r²/k

Substituting the given values, we get:

q = (1.9 N/C) * (0.66 m)² / (9.0 x [tex]10^9[/tex] N m²/C²)

q = 2.2 x [tex]10^{-9[/tex] C

B. Using the same formula as before, we can find the magnitude of the point charge:

q = E*r²/k

Substituting the given values, we get:

q = (1.34 N/C) * (0.909 m)² / (9.0 x [tex]10^9[/tex] N m²/C²)

q = 1.2 x [tex]10^{-8[/tex] C

Magnitude refers to the size or extent of something, usually measured on a numerical scale. It is a term commonly used in science, mathematics, and engineering, but it can also be used in everyday language to describe the importance or impact of something. In mathematics, magnitude is often used to describe the distance between two points or the size of a vector in a certain direction.

In physics, it can refer to the strength or intensity of a force, such as the magnitude of an earthquake or the magnitude of an electric field. In everyday language, magnitude can be used to describe the significance or impact of something, such as the magnitude of a problem or the magnitude of a success. It can also refer to the scale of something, such as the magnitude of a project or the magnitude of a budget.

To learn more about Magnitude visit here:

brainly.com/question/14452091

#SPJ4

The answer is that the loss of energy when it is converted from one form to another is usually in the form of heat.

According to the laws of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be converted from one form to another. However, during the conversion process, some of the energy is lost in the form of heat due to the inefficiencies of the conversion process. For example, when fuel is burned in a car engine, only a portion of the energy is converted into motion, while the rest is lost as heat through the exhaust system. Similarly, when a light bulb is turned on, only a fraction of the electrical energy is converted into visible light, while the rest is lost as heat. This phenomenon is known as energy dissipation or energy loss.

To know more about dissipation  visit:

brainly.com/question/15331125

#SPJ11

The patella, also known as the kneecap, serves an important role in the mechanics of the knee joint. One of its functions is to displace the quadriceps tendon posteriorly, which means towards the back of the leg.

This displacement increases the moment arm of the quadriceps muscle, which is the perpendicular distance from the tendon's line of action to the joint axis. The moment arm is important because it determines the effectiveness of the muscle's force in causing joint movement.

By increasing the moment arm, the patella improves the mechanical advantage of the quadriceps muscle. This means that the muscle can generate more force and exert greater torque around the knee joint for a given amount of effort. As a result, the patella helps to increase the stability and efficiency of the knee joint during activities such as walking, running, and jumping.

However, if the patella is not properly aligned or if there is damage to the quadriceps tendon, this displacement can cause problems such as patellar instability or tendinitis. Therefore, it is important to maintain good knee health through proper exercise, stretching, and medical attention when necessary.

You can learn more about the patella at: brainly.com/question/17777204

#SPJ11

In some cases, a larger force over a shorter time interval may be preferable to a smaller force over a larger time interval.

This is because the total amount of work done is the same regardless of the force or time interval used, but the way the force is applied can affect other factors such as efficiency and safety. For example, if you need to move a heavy object quickly, applying a larger force over a shorter time interval may be more efficient and effective than applying a smaller force over a longer time interval. However, if safety is a concern, it may be better to apply a smaller force over a longer time interval to reduce the risk of injury or damage. Ultimately, the choice of force and time interval depends on the specific situation and the desired outcome.

A larger force applied over a shorter time interval can produce the same impulse as a smaller force applied over a longer time interval. This can be beneficial in certain situations, such as reducing the impact of a collision or accelerating an object more quickly.

To know more about force visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30507236

#SPJ11

The strategy that breaks a whole into constituent parts is called "analytical" communication. In this approach, the speaker or writer dissects the subject matter into smaller components and explains each part in detail.

Analytical communication is commonly used in technical writing, scientific reports, and academic papers. The purpose is to help the audience understand complex ideas by breaking them down into simpler concepts. For example, when discussing the structure of a molecule, the analyst would describe the individual atoms and how they bond together. Similarly, when explaining the stages of a supernova, the speaker would discuss each phase and the events that occur during that stage.
In contrast, classification communication groups information based on similarities and differences. This approach is used to categorize information and identify patterns. For example, a biologist may classify different species based on their characteristics.
In summary, analytical communication is the primary strategy used to break down complex concepts into smaller components, while classification communication groups information based on similarities and differences.

Learn more about communication here:

https://brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ11

The gravitational torque about the right end of the rod is 31.25 N·m.

Since the rod is uniform and horizontal, its center of mass is located at its midpoint. The weight of the rod acts vertically downward at the center of mass, so it does not create any torque about the right end of the rod.

Therefore, we need to consider only the torque created by the weight of the left half of the rod. The weight of the left half of the rod is:

W = (1/2)mg = (1/2)(5.0 kg)(10 m/s^2) = 25 N

The distance from the left end of the rod to the center of mass is:

d = L/4 = 1.25 m

where L is the length of the rod.

Therefore, the torque created by the weight of the left half of the rod about the right end is:

τ = Wd = (25 N)(1.25 m) = 31.25 N·m

The gravitational torque about the right end of the rod is 31.25 N·m.

To learn more about mass, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/19694949

#SPJ11

Storm surge occurs when a large and powerful storm, such as a hurricane or typhoon, moves across a body of water and pushes the water towards the shore. This results in a sudden and dangerous rise in sea level, which can cause devastating flooding and destruction in coastal areas.

The storm surge of super-typhoon Haiyan was so dangerous because it was one of the strongest storms ever recorded, with sustained winds of up to 195 mph. As it made landfall in the Philippines, it pushed a massive wall of water towards the shore, which reached heights of up to 30 feet in some areas. This caused widespread flooding and destruction, and was responsible for many of the more than 6,000 deaths that occurred as a result of the storm. The storm surge also caused significant damage to infrastructure, homes, and businesses, and made rescue and relief efforts more difficult and dangerous. Overall, the storm surge of super-typhoon Haiyan serves as a stark reminder of the devastating power of these types of storms, and the importance of preparedness and emergency planning in coastal communities.

learn more about storm surge

https://brainly.com/question/30486380

#SPJ11

A force known as friction prevents movement between two surfaces that are in touch. A static frictional force acts on an object when it is at rest on a surface and stops it from moving. An external force that is stronger than the static frictional force.

However, the frictional force switches from static to kinetic as soon as the item begins to move. Although it can do so when moving quickly or under a lot of stress, the coefficient of kinetic friction is typically lower than the coefficient of static friction. This implies that the amount of force needed to overcome friction may rise when the object moves faster or is subjected to more force.

To know more about static frictional , here

brainly.com/question/17237604

#SPJ1

Pneumatic tools, such as nail and staple guns, are powered by compressed air. The compressed air is stored in a tank or generated by a compressor, which is then used to power the tool.

When the trigger is pulled, the compressed air is released, causing a piston to move and drive the staple or nail into the material. Pneumatic tools are popular because they are lightweight and efficient, allowing for quick and easy fastening of materials. In the case of staple guns, they use a special type of staple that is designed to be driven into the material with precision and strength, making them ideal for a wide range of applications.
Pneumatic tools, such as nail and staple guns, are powered by compressed air. These devices use air pressure to drive staples or nails into various materials. The compressed air is typically supplied by an air compressor, which generates and stores the required air pressure for the tool to operate efficiently. Pneumatic tools offer increased power and efficiency compared to their manual or electric counterparts, making them a popular choice for many applications.

For more information on Pneumatic visit:

brainly.com/question/20322086

#SPJ11

a. The moment of inertia of the array of point objects about the vertical axis is 6.5 kg·m.

b. The moment of inertia of the array of point objects about the horizontal axis is 2.0 kg·m.

c. The harder it is to accelerate the array about the y-axis, because the moment of inertia about that axis is larger.  

a) To calculate the moment of inertia of the array of point objects about the vertical axis, we can use the following formula:

I = [tex]mr^2[/tex]

We can find the moment of inertia about the vertical axis by integrating the moment of inertia about the horizontal axis about the point of interest, which is halfway between the two masses.

The moment of inertia about the horizontal axis can be calculated as follows:

[tex]I_h = m(r/2)^2\\I_h = m(r/2)^2\\I_h = mr^2 / 4\\I_h = mr^2 / 2\\I_h = (m + M)r^2 / 2\\I_y = (m + M)r^2 / 2\\I_v = mr^2 / 4\\I_v = mr^2 / 4\\I_v = (m + 2M)r^2 / 4\\I_v = (m + 2M)(r^2 / 2)\\\\I_v = (m + 2M)r^2[/tex]

[tex]I_v = (2.0 + 3.5)(2.0)(1.0)^2\\I_v = (2.0 + 3.5)(2.0)(1.0)\\I_v = 6.5[/tex]

Therefore, the moment of inertia of the array of point objects about the vertical axis is 6.5 kg·m.

b) To calculate the moment of inertia of the array of point objects about the horizontal axis, we can use the following formula:

[tex]I = mr^2[/tex]

We can find the moment of inertia about the horizontal axis by integrating the moment of inertia about the vertical axis about the point of interest, which is halfway between the two masses.

The moment of inertia about the horizontal axis can be calculated as follows:

[tex]I_h = m(r/2)^2\\I_h = 2.0(1.0)^2\\I_h = 2.0[/tex]

Therefore, the moment of inertia of the array of point objects about the horizontal axis is 2.0 kg·m.

c) The harder it is to accelerate the array about the y-axis, because the moment of inertia about that axis is larger.  

Learn more about moment of inertia Visit: brainly.com/question/3406242

#SPJ4

The distance between the two long parallel wires is 8.10 x 10^-5 meters.

To find the distance between the two long parallel wires, we can use the equation:

F = (μ₀/4π) * (2I₁I₂/d)

Where F is the force per length, μ₀ is the permeability of free space (4π x 10^-7 Tm/A), I₁ and I₂ are the currents in the two wires, and d is the distance between the wires.

We are given that the two wires each carry a current of 81.0 A and experience a force per length of 0.8 N/m. Plugging in these values and solving for d, we get:

0.8 N/m = (4π x 10^-7 Tm/A) * (2 x 81.0 A x 81.0 A) / d

Simplifying and rearranging, we get:

d = (4π x 10^-7 Tm/A) * (2 x 81.0 A x 81.0 A) / 0.8 N/m

d = 8.10 x 10^-5 m

Therefore, the distance between the two long parallel wires is 8.10 x 10^-5 meters.

To know more about parallel click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31744314

#SPJ11

To find the total energy absorbed, you need to multiply the spectral, hemispherical absorptivity of the opaque surface by the spectral distribution of radiation incident on the surface at each wavelength and sum up the results.

Based on the information given, we can determine the following:

a. The total energy absorbed can be calculated by integrating the product of the spectral absorptivity and the spectral distribution over all wavelengths. This gives:

∫(0.8)(7000)dλ + ∫(0.5)(2000)dλ + ∫(0.3)(500)dλ = 4200 >

b. The total incident energy can be calculated by integrating the spectral distribution over all wavelengths. This gives:

∫7000dλ + ∫2000dλ + ∫500dλ = 27000 >

c. The hemispherical absorptivity of the surface is given as 0.156, which means that only 15.6% of the incident energy is absorbed by the surface.

Learn more about energy here:

brainly.com/question/10507976

#SPJ11

The physical changes do not alter the chemical composition of a substance, and therefore, any physical property of the material will remain the same before and after the change.

The term "therefore" suggests that the statement to follow is a conclusion drawn from previous information. Based on this, I will assume that the previous information relates to the nature of matter and physical changes.

In the context of matter, physical changes are those that do not alter the chemical composition of a substance. Examples include changes in state, such as melting or evaporating, or changes in shape or size, such as cutting or crushing.

During physical changes, the composition of the material remains the same, only the arrangement of the particles and their energy levels change. Therefore, any physical property of the substance, such as its density, mass, or volume, will remain the same before and after the change.

For example, if a piece of ice is melted, the resulting liquid will have the same mass and volume as the original ice. The physical change only altered the arrangement of water molecules, not their chemical makeup.

For more such questions on physical

https://brainly.com/question/1978861

#SJP11

The kinetic energy of a baseball with a mass of 146 g and a velocity of <23i, 23j, -14k> m/s is = 91.5 J

we need to use the formula: KE = [tex](1/2)mv^2[/tex], where m is the mass of the baseball and v is its velocity.

1. Convert the mass of the baseball from grams to kilograms: 146 g× (1 kg / 1000 g) = 0.146 kg
2. Find the magnitude of the velocity vector: [tex]\sqrt{(23^2) + (23^2) + (-14^2)[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{(529 + 529 + 196)[/tex] =[tex]\sqrt{ (1254)[/tex] ≈ 35.38 m/s
3. Calculate the kinetic energy using the formula: KE = [tex](1/2)mv^2[/tex]

Now, we can plug in the values:
KE = (1/2) × 0.146 kg × [tex](35.38 m/s)^2[/tex] ≈ 91.5 J

So, the kinetic energy of the baseball is approximately 91.5 J.

To learn more about   kinetic energy visit:   https://brainly.com/question/8101588

#SPJ11

The discovery of pulsars was initially misinterpreted as evidence of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe because their signals were highly regular and unlike any known natural celestial phenomena at the time. The Explanation for this misinterpretation is that astronomers were unfamiliar with pulsars and their properties when they were first discovered.

Here's a step-by-step explanation of the situation:

1. Pulsars were first detected in 1967 by Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Antony Hewish.
2. The signals they observed were very regular and repeating, leading them to believe they might be coming from an artificial source.
3. Due to the lack of knowledge about pulsars and their properties, the initial interpretation of these signals was that they might be evidence of intelligent life communicating from elsewhere in the universe. This hypothesis was even nicknamed "LGM" (Little Green Men) in jest.
4. Further research and observation led astronomers to understand that these signals were actually coming from rapidly rotating neutron stars, which are natural celestial objects.
5. As our understanding of pulsars grew, it became clear that they were not evidence of intelligent life but rather a fascinating new type of celestial object.

In conclusion, the discovery of pulsars was initially misinterpreted as evidence of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe because their highly regular signals were unfamiliar and unlike any known natural phenomena at the time. However, as our understanding of pulsars expanded, this misinterpretation was corrected.

To know more about celestial visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/14165378

#SPJ11