The correct answer is D.
D. "The illusion of a Greek necessity" .
The assonant "flows in the scrolls of her toga" alludes to written scrolls as well as the fabric of the toga, making the phrase "illusion of a Greek necessity" unclear. The parallel to Greek tragedy is strengthened by the image of "each lifeless infant coiled, a white serpent," which alludes to Medea. The female is perfect. She is deceased. Body displays a smile of satisfaction and the appearance of a Greek requirement. Flows in the scrolls of her toga, leaving her bare. The assonant "flows in the scrolls of her toga" alludes to written scrolls as well as the fabric of the toga, making the phrase "illusion of a Greek necessity" dubious.
To know more about phrase refer :
brainly.com/question/28924495
#SPJ4
Antonym of barrier …..
Answer:
challenge
Explanation:
The antonym of barrier is challenging. Thus, option A is appropriate.
An antonym is a word type whose meaning is the exact opposite of that of another word. A word that has the opposite meaning from another word is called an antonym.
Words with the opposite connotation from another term are known as antonyms. Your work improves when you use the appropriate synonym. Your vocabulary will grow and your language awareness will improve as a result of learning common antonyms.
An antonym is a word type whose meaning is the exact opposite of that of another word.
Thus, option A is correct.
Learn more about the Antonym here:
https://brainly.com/question/11457192
#SPJ6
Which sentence best makes the claim that Zaroff's civility does not disguise his brutality in "The Most Dangerous Game"?
Rainsford falls for Zaroff's hunt in the story "The Most Dangerous Game" because Zaroff's civility disguises his brutality.
O Zaroff's passion for hunting Rainsford in "The Most Dangerous Game" is a surprising twist to the suspenseful story.
In the story "The Most Dangerous Game," Zaroff's polite words and civil behavior cannot disguise his true brutal intentions.
Zaroff's kind welcome and generous attitude toward Rainsford in "The Most Dangerous Game" lead to the audience questioning Zaroff's intentions.
The sentence that best makes the claim that Zaroff's civility does not disguise his brutality in "The Most Dangerous Game" is "In the story "The Most Dangerous Game," Zaroff's polite words and civil behavior cannot disguise his true brutal intentions." The correct option is C.
How to explain the informationThis sentence clearly suggests that although Zaroff appears polite and civil, his true intentions are brutal and violent.
It implies that his seemingly polite and welcoming demeanor is merely a facade that cannot conceal his true nature as a hunter who enjoys killing humans for sport.
Learn more about claim on:
https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Answer: C In the story “The Most Dangerous Game,” Zaroff’s polite words and civil behavior cannot disguise his true brutal intentions.
what year did malaysia airlines flight mh370 disappear with 239 people on board?
While it was on route from Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Malaysia to its intended destination, Beijing Capital International Airport in China, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (MH370/MAS370), a commercial airliner, vanished on March 8, 2014.
Total 239 passengers who were traveling to Beijing on Malaysia Airlines flight 370 on March 8, 2014, vanished after boarding the aircraft in Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia. According to The Guardian, MH370 entered Vietnamese airspace just 40 minutes into the flight and vanished from radar afterward.
Datin Biby Nazli Mohd Hassim, Chen Wei Hiong, Karmooi Chew, Ch'ng Mei Ling, Anne Daisy, Dina Mohamed Ramli, Huajin Guan, Puiheng Hue, Lee Kah Kin, Lee Sew Chu, and Lim Pou Chua were among the Malaysians that boarded Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.
Learn more about malaysia airlines Visit: brainly.com/question/28271806
#SPJ4
Write an essay using any children's story you'd like. In your essay, persuade the main character to make a different choice.
-4 paragraphs
please anybody!!
can y'all make the essay to a way that I doesn't look like a professional essay, just simple.
In the beloved children's story of "The Three Little Pigs," the main character, the third little pig, makes a decision that ultimately saves his life. However, there is a way he could have avoided the dangerous situation altogether.
An essay based on The Three Little PigsWhen the big bad wolf comes to blow down the third little pig's brick house, the pig successfully defends himself and his home. But what if the pig had made a different choice earlier in the story? Rather than building a house out of bricks, he could have built a house out of stronger materials, like steel or concrete.
By choosing to build a stronger house, the third little pig could have avoided the risk of being attacked by the wolf altogether. This would have saved him time, money, and stress in the long run, and would have allowed him to live in peace and safety.
In addition to the practical benefits of building a stronger house, the third little pig could have also set an example for his fellow pigs. By choosing to prioritize safety and security over speed and convenience, he could have encouraged his siblings to do the same, ultimately creating a safer and more resilient community.
In conclusion, while the third little pig's choice to build a brick house ultimately saved his life, he could have avoided the danger altogether by making a different choice earlier in the story. By choosing to build a stronger house out of materials like steel or concrete, the pig could have prioritized safety and set an example for his fellow pigs.
Read more on essays here:https://brainly.com/question/25607827
#SPJ1
if you're familiar w romeo and juliet
Answer:
Rigidly Certain
Hope this helps!
Explanation:
In Act 1, Scene 5, Romeo first kisses Juliet. Afterward, when Romeo learns that Juliet is a Capulet, he is devastated. But in Act 2, Scene 2, it can be seen that even though Romeo knows that Juliet is a Capulet, he will still love her no matter what. Romeo and Juliet also agree to get married in Act 2, Scene 2...
I believe the answer would be d ( hopelessly confused), but I am not completely certain d is correct.
Explanation: Act 1, scene 5:
1. capulet welcomes romeo and his friends to the party.
2. romeo sees juliet and is captivated by her beauty.
3. The two meet and fall in love.
Act 2 scene, scene 2:
1. Juliet appears on her balcony and reveals her love to romeo in a soliquy form.
2. Romeo stands below, listening and reveals his feelings towards Juliet.
After reading these summaries on both scenes, choose the answer that best suits the question.
Hope this helps, and good luck!
4. Why does Vladek say "we came away happy" (Spiegelman 130).
5. Explain what happened to the Gelbers' son. Use a direct quotation from the chapter to support your answer.
Vladek says "we came away happy" in Spiegelman's Maus because he and his wife, Anja, were able to negotiate the release of their son, Richieu, from Nazi custody. Vladek describes the negotiation process as "hard bargaining" and explains that they had to pay a large sum of money to secure Richieu's release.
Explain what happened to Gelber's son.Vladek's statement "we came away happy" in Maus by Art Spiegelman is a poignant reminder of the difficult decisions and sacrifices that families had to make during the Holocaust. Vladek and Anja were able to negotiate the release of their son, Richieu, from Nazi custody, but it came at a great cost. The negotiation process was described as "hard bargaining," and the couple had to pay a large sum of money to secure their son's freedom. This highlights the immense financial strain that the Holocaust placed on families, in addition to the emotional and physical trauma that they endured.
Furthermore, the tragic story of the Gelbers' son illustrates the heartbreaking reality of the separation and loss that many families experienced during the Holocaust. The Gelbers entrusted their son to a Polish family for safekeeping, but they were unable to find him after they were sent to Auschwitz. The pain and anguish of losing a child are palpable in Mr Gelber's words, and it is a testament to the unimaginable horrors that families faced during this period.
Overall, Vladek's statement "we came away happy" is a bittersweet reminder of the resilience and perseverance of families during the Holocaust. Despite the immense challenges and sacrifices that they faced, families like Vladek and Anja's were able to hold onto hope and find moments of joy amidst the darkness. However, it also underscores the devastating toll that the Holocaust had on families and the importance of remembering their stories and honouring their memory.
To learn more about Nazi, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5033467
#SPJ1
Why did Stanton MOST LIKELY base the structure of the passage on the Declaration of Independence?
1.to correct flawed assumptions made in the original document
2.to draw attention to women’s role in the founding of the nation
3.to offer various possible interpretations of the original document
4.to emphasize the similarities between women’s rights activists and colonial patriots
In order to draw parallels between the hardships of the Founding Fathers as well as the women's movement, Stanton produced the Declaration on Sentiments, which was largely based just on Declaration of Independence. (Choice 4)
What document served as the foundation for the Declaration of Sentiments' structure?The Declaration of Sentiments, which demanded that women be granted full citizenship rights and was fashioned after the American Declaration of Independence, used terminology from the antislavery struggle.
The document was signed by 32 men and 68 women. We believe that all men and women were created equal and that these rights, including the right to life, liberty, as well as the pursuit of happiness, are given to them by their Creator.
To know more about Declaration of Sentiments visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17178282
#SPJ1
Discuss how you can identify characters in a Story
Study a character's behaviors to determine their personality quirks. Consider the personality of the lead character. Make and the impact they have on both the character and other characters in the narrative.
What are the characters of a story?A human, an animal, a creature, an item, etc. might all be considered characters in a story. Authors use characters to do activities and deliver dialogue in order to progress the plot of the narrative. One protagonist can appear in a story and it still be deemed complete.
What function do characters serve in a narrative?Your cast of characters forms the nucleus of your story. Your characters shape and propel your story. Readers may inhabit the world that you have envisioned via your characters because of how they relate to and interpret their environment.
To know more about Character visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13141964
#SPJ1
Which detail from the text best demonstrates the effect of totalitarianism on the animals? “progress was made in the dry frosty weather that followed.†“it had been decided to build the walls three feet thick.†“they were always cold, and usually hungry as well.†“for a long time the quarry was full of snowdrifts and nothing could be done.â€
The detail from the text that best demonstrates the effect of totalitarianism on the animals is "they were always cold, and usually hungry as well." Option C is correct.
The quote "they were always cold, and usually hungry as well" is the best detail that demonstrates the effect of totalitarianism on the animals because it shows the animals are suffering from neglect and lack of proper care under the new regime.
Totalitarianism is a political system where the state has complete control over every aspect of citizens' lives, and this includes controlling access to basic necessities such as food and shelter. The animals in the text are subject to this type of control, and as a result, they are always cold and hungry.
The other quotes, such as "progress was made in the dry frosty weather" and "it had been decided to build the walls three feet thick" are more focused on the construction of the animals' new home, which is a result of the new regime. However, the animals' suffering due to the totalitarianism is best exemplified by the detail that they are cold and hungry. Hence Option C is correct.
To learn more about Totalitarianism, here
https://brainly.com/question/14502003
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Which detail from the text best demonstrates the effect of totalitarianism on the animals?
progress was made in the dry frosty weather that followed.it had been decided to build the walls three feet thick.they were always cold, and usually hungry as well.for a long time the quarry was full of snowdrifts and nothing could be done.Being success throughout your school year takes a good deal or planning and perseverance. What resources and skills do you believe every high school student needs to be successful academically? What is one thing you would like to improve yourself this year
While it is undeniably important for students to learn subjects like English, maths, and science, other abilities, such as critical thinking, social interaction, and empathy, will probably receive more popular responses.
What additional life skills should pupils learn at school, in your opinion?The way children interact with one another and reflect on their own behaviour will be much improved by teaching them effective communication skills, empathy, seeing things from other people's viewpoints, and respect.
Why is it crucial for kids to have skills?The development of skills is crucial in education because it helps students become more well-rounded people, improves their social and emotional wellbeing, and prepares them for the demands of the workforce.
To know more about crucial in education visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/12879663
#SPJ1
discriptive essay on summer holidays for class 9?
6
Why is the list of three so effective?
A.
Because it gives three distinct points.
B.
No one knows exactly why.
C.
Because it gives three sides to an argument.
D.
Because human beings naturally think in threes.
Answer:
A
Explanation:It is fine decision to think different ways
How does Jordan’s story about Daisy’s marriage (Pages 76-77) develop Daisy’s characterization?
A. It implies that Daisy married Tom only for his money.
B. It implies that Daisy loved both Gatsby and Tom.
C. It implies that Daisy still regrets marrying Tom.
D. It implies that Daisy never loved Gatsby.
The answer of the question How does Jordan’s story about Daisy’s marriage (Pages 76-77) develop Daisy’s characterization? is option 1.) It implies that Daisy married Tom only for his money
Jordan's story about Daisy's marriage, as told on pages 76-77 of The Great Gatsby, implies that Daisy married Tom only for his money. This development in Daisy's characterization suggests that she values wealth and material possessions more than love or loyalty, and that she may not be entirely trustworthy or sincere in her relationships. This revelation provides insight into Daisy's motivations and suggests that she may have played a role in the tragic events that occur later in the novel. By revealing this aspect of Daisy's character through Jordan's story, F. Scott Fitzgerald deepens the reader's understanding of Daisy and her role in the narrative.
for more information on characterization see:
https://brainly.com/question/660820
#SPJ1
Draft the summary for The Odyssey Part 1, The Odyssey Part 2, The Odyssey Part 3, or Orpheus and Eurydice. Remember to use your own words and to focus only on important information
Explanation:
Summary of The Odyssey Part 1: "The Odyssey Part 1" is an epic poem written by Homer that tells the story of Odysseus, a hero of the Trojan War, and his ten-year journey home to Ithaca. The first part of the epic introduces Odysseus and his family, including his wife Penelope and son Telemachus, as well as the gods and goddesses who play a role in his journey. The epic also details Odysseus' encounters with the Cyclops, Polyphemus, and the sorceress Circe, as well as his struggles to resist the temptations of the Sirens and the allure of the nymph Calypso.
Summary of The Odyssey Part 2: "The Odyssey Part 2" continues the epic journey of Odysseus as he battles the sea god Poseidon and faces numerous challenges on his journey home. The epic includes his encounters with the cannibalistic Laestrygonians, the witch-goddess Circe, and the underworld, where he speaks with the spirit of the prophet Tiresias. Odysseus also faces the wrath of Poseidon, who causes his ship to sink, leaving him stranded on the island of the sea-nymph Calypso for seven years.
Summary of The Odyssey Part 3: "The Odyssey Part 3" follows Odysseus' final journey home to Ithaca and his struggle to reclaim his kingdom and reunite with his wife and son. The epic details his encounter with the Phaeacians, who provide him with a ship and escort him to Ithaca, as well as his challenges in defeating the suitors who have taken over his palace and are vying for his wife's hand in marriage. With the help of his son Telemachus and the goddess Athena, Odysseus is able to defeat the suitors and reclaim his kingdom.
Summary of Orpheus and Eurydice: "Orpheus and Eurydice" is a Greek myth that tells the story of Orpheus, a legendary musician, and his love for Eurydice, a beautiful nymph. When Eurydice dies from a snake bite, Orpheus descends to the underworld to plead with Hades, the god of the underworld, to allow her to return to the land of the living. Moved by Orpheus' music, Hades agrees to let Eurydice go, but on the condition that Orpheus does not look back at her until they have reached the surface. Tragically, Orpheus cannot resist the urge to look back and loses Eurydice forever. The myth is often seen as a cautionary tale about the power of love and the danger of temptation.
romeoo and juliettt!!
can y’all please help me, can y’all give me three examples..FROM THE TEXTTT (quotations marks) on why it’s Romeo and Juliet are at fault for their death !
thankkss love y’all mean it <3
From the text Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, there are many examples for why they are at fault for their own deaths.
Why are Romeo and Juliet at fault for their deaths?"O, I am fortune's fool!" - Romeo, Act 3, Scene 1In this scene, Romeo has just killed Tybalt and is expressing his regret for his actions. He recognizes that his impulsive behavior has led him to this point and that he is a victim of fate. However, this quote also suggests that Romeo himself acknowledges that his own actions have contributed to his misfortune.
"This is thy sheath; there rest, and let me die." - Juliet, Act 5, Scene 3In this final scene, Juliet awakens from her false death and discovers that Romeo has killed himself. Rather than accepting responsibility for her own actions, Juliet chooses to blame the feud between the Capulets and Montagues for her fate. However, by choosing to take a potion that would make her appear dead, Juliet knowingly puts herself in a dangerous situation and contributes to the tragic outcome.
"And here I stand, both to impeach and purge, myself condemned and myself excused." - Friar Laurence, Act 5, Scene 3In this scene, Friar Laurence acknowledges his role in the tragedy, admitting that he both contributed to and tried to prevent the events that led to Romeo and Juliet's deaths. While he recognizes that fate also played a role, Friar Laurence acknowledges that Romeo and Juliet made their own choices and that they bear some responsibility for their fate.
To know more about Romeo and Juliet, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10468114
#SPJ1
raisin in the sun
how does the characters anticipate that this check will change their lives?
One οf the first times a drama included an entire cast οf African-American characters was in "A Raisin in the Sun." The characters are strοng, real, and authentic fοr the first time. The key tο cοmprehending the drama's theme is tο have a sοlid understanding οf each character and hοw they fit intο the family.
"A Raisin in the Sun" by Lοrraine Hansberry (1959), which is set in 1950s America that is emerging frοm the Great Depressiοn and at a time οf racial tensiοn and sοcial upheaval, examines the sοcial dynamics οf the era. Langstοn Hughes, an African-American pοet assοciated with the Harlem Renaissance, prοvided the inspiratiοn fοr the play's title.
Many prοblems are tackled in this drama, including racism, marriage, pοverty, and educatiοn, as well as family relatiοnships, abοrtiοn, and sοcial mοbility. With prοminent African-American characters whο were presented seriοusly and as three-dimensiοnal humans, "A Raisin in the Sun" was a grοundbreaking bοοk fοr its day. Thrοughοut, we witness hοw each member οf the family suffers frοm their individual shοrtcοmings and dreams.
To learn more about 'A Raisin in the Sun', visit:
brainly.com/question/30627662
#SPJ9
Lori designs a computer simulation with 25 trials and uses the data from the simulation to create a graph. The graph shows the relative frequency of the number of spins in her simulation to land on each color once. Using the graph, what is the probability that a player lands on each color once in less than 7 spins?
The probability that a player lands on each color once in less than 7 spins can be determined by looking at the graph.
According to the graph, for spins with six or fewer, the proportion of spins in the simulation that land on each color once is almost 90%. Therefore, there is a 90% chance that a player will hit each color once in fewer than seven spins. Each number's chance of coming up on the die is one sixth. The results in these two trials are equally likely to take place. Let's examine an experiment where the results are not equally likely to occur. Third experiment There are 6 red, 5 green, 8 blue, and 3 yellow marbles in a glass jar.
To know more about According refer :
brainly.com/question/13954216
#SPJ1
In The Crucible, how is John Proctors character trait strong? (possible proof from a quote)
One way in which John Proctor's character trait is strong in "The Crucible" is his determination to speak the truth and stand up against injustice, even at the risk of his own life.
Who is John Proctors?
John Proctor is the protagonist of the play "The Crucible" by Arthur Miller. He is a farmer in Salem, Massachusetts, during the 17th century and is married to Elizabeth Proctor. He is initially reluctant to get involved in the witchcraft hysteria that is sweeping through the town but ultimately becomes a key figure in exposing the falsehoods and manipulations of the accusers. John Proctor is known for his integrity, honesty, and strong sense of morality.
This is evident in his refusal to falsely confess to witchcraft and his decision to rip up the signed confession, saying "Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life!" (Act IV, Scene 4). Despite the pressure and temptation to save his life by lying, Proctor chooses to uphold his integrity and values. This demonstrates his strong moral character and his courage in the face of adversity.
Learn more about John Proctors from given link
https://brainly.com/question/18222550
#SPJ1
Which speech made a stronger use of the appeal to reason? Write two paragraphs that compare and contrast both speeches in terms of their appeals to reason. Provide specific examples from the text to support your point. Use proper spelling and grammar
Answer:
The speech that made a stronger use of the appeal to emotion was Antony's speech, whereas Brutus's speech appealed more to logic, as explained below.
Antony's and Brutus's speeches
Antony and Brutus are characters in Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar," and they both address the crowd after Caesar is killed. However, their speeches are quite different.
Brutus's speech appeals to logic. His aim to show his audience that Caesar was not a good leader and that they are better off without him. On the other hand, Antony's speech appeals to emotion as he cries and shows the audience what a good man Caesar was.
Antony's speech ends up being more effective precisely because it appeals to emotions. The crowd is moved to tears and ends up feeling outraged by the fact that Caesar was killed.
Explanation:
Learn more about appeal to emotion here:
brainly.com/question/24193390
no one is going to help her into passive
Answer:The passive voice of the given sentence would be:
She is not going to be helped by anyone.
Explanation:
you will often have multiple ways to communicate a message to another person. your choice of a communication channel should consider the amount of detail and context the message requires. the richness of a communication channel is determined, in part, by the ability to handle multiple cues simultaneously. this means that a telephone call will be less rich than , because:
In communication, the richness of a communication channel is determined, in part, by the ability to handle multiple cues simultaneously. A telephone call will be less rich than email because email allows for a greater degree of detail and context in a message
.Communication is the transmission of information from one person to another through a communication channel. Communication is critical to the success of any business. To ensure that messages are effectively conveyed, businesses must choose the most effective communication channels to use.
A telephone call is less rich than an email because it is less effective at handling multiple cues simultaneously. A telephone call is more effective at handling verbal cues than nonverbal cues, while email is more effective at handling nonverbal cues than verbal cues.
know more about nonverbal cues here
https://brainly.com/question/10948713#
#SPJ11
What was nicks final message to the readers in the great gatsby
No matter how much wealth or achievement we may amass, Nick's assessment in the final sentence is a reflection on how we'll constantly want to "have it all" in vain.
Towards the conclusion, Nick learns what?In contrast, here's what we believe is happening: Nick understands that striving for a goal in the future just traps us in the present. Like Gatsby, who once believed he would succeed, all of our dreams are founded on fantasies of our former selves.
Nick left Gatsby with what final words?"The whole bunch isn't worth you," someone once said. The final time Nick sees Gatsby in person is in Chapter 8, where he says these words to him.
To know more about Nick's assessment visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/2190360
#SPJ1
use the sentence to answer the question. the men in the restaurant chatted about their dogs. which word has a similar connotation and denotation to the word chatted as it is used in the sentence?
The men in the restaurant chatted about their dogs. The word "talked" has a similar connotation and denotation to the word "chatted" as it is used in the sentence.
Both the words have similar meanings, however, there may be some differences in the tone or purpose of the conversation depending on the context in which they are used. Both 'chatted' and 'talked' are verbs that describe the act of conversing between two or more people.
They both indicate an informal and light-hearted discussion, but chatted tends to be used to describe more casual conversations that are less serious or meaningful. On the other hand, talked is used for more serious or meaningful conversations.
know more about connotation here
https://brainly.com/question/16701112#
#SPJ11
50 points asap!
select the correct answer
What is ethos?
1. an appeal to credibility?
2. an appeal to occasion?
3. an appeal to emotion?
4. an appeal to reason?
Answer: ethos is a rhetorical or written technique that appeals to an audience or reader's ethics
Example: If my years as a Marine taught me anything, it's that caution is the best policy in this sort of situation.
What type of poem is if by Rudyard Kipling?
What type of poem is 'If—'? Kipling wrote 'If—' in the form of paternal advice to a child. Here, the child is none other than the poet's son, John. It is a type of didactic poem that teaches readers how to be an ideal human being.
why does the narrator refer to himself as an "orge?" what comparison can you draw between how horna views the narrator and the old objects and how the narrator as a boy viewed similar people and objects?
The narrator maybe refers to himself as an "ogre" due to the fact he feels old, large, and clumsy in comparison to his son's fiancé Morna, who looks to be refined and full of innocence, hope, and possibilities.
Why used to be narrator pleased to fly at night?Answer: The author was very pleased when he determined to fly that night time because he was going domestic to his family to enjoy his holiday. When he started, the entirety appeared to be perfect.
Why used to be the narrator pleased to go to pneumonia?Ans. The narrator did not like the dirty and darkish facets of the city life. He thinking that he would locate some satisfactory points of interest in New Mullion. So, he was once completely satisfied to go there.
After the loss of all his belongings in the fireplace that ravaged his house, Zan, the narrator, began feeling depressed and embarrassed.
Learn more about narrator here;
https://brainly.com/question/860877
#SPJ1
In his Nobel Prize speech, Elie Wiesel states, "action is the only remedy to indifference, the most insidious danger of all" (120).
In your own words, explain what this quote means and describe how it connects to the purpose of the memoir.
Your response should be at least 5-8 sentences. You can copy/paste the sentence above to begin your response.
Answer:
Elie Wiesel's quote, "action is the only remedy to indifference, the most insidious danger of all" taken from his Nobel Prize speech is referring to the lack of action taken by individuals to stand up and spread awareness about the Holocaust and the atrocities that were committed. He claims that the remedy to indifference, which he considers the most insidious danger of all, is taking action and informing ourselves, as well as not keeping silent about the injustices in the world. He encourages the audience to choose the good side- the victim's side- and defend it fervently.
Wiesel's memoir is entirely about this. In his memoir, he recounts his experiences from the Holocaust and how it affected him and his life. He wishes to share that awareness with the audience and his readers so through this quote he is building upon what he already stated in his book.
Please mark brainliest! Hope this helped!
What is Darrow’s argument in the excerpt? How well does Darrow support his argument? Use evidence from the text to support your response. Your response should be one or two complete paragraphs.
excerpt from Clarence Darrow’s closing argument
in Illinois v. Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb, August 22–25, 1924
HELPP
Darrow's case is strongly supported by the fact that no one younger than 21 has ever received a death sentence. No one who had entered a guilty plea and was under the age of 28 or 30 had received a death sentence.
Why was Clarence Darrow famous?17 August 1912: Darrow. The Day Book, Image 32, Chicago, IL. Historical American Newspapers: Chronicling America. Clarence Darrow (1857-1938), though most people know him for winning the Scopes Monkey Trial, first rose to prominence as America's top labour lawyer.
Darrow – how to use in a sentence?Jack Darrow's proposal that you dedicate a page to your writers is one that I wholeheartedly support. The distance between Darrow House and the river was about three miles, but I could see that two tiny creeks meandered up into the meadowland.
To know more about Darrow visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15769390
#SPJ1
why is jonas so adamant that lily is not angry over the playground infraction, just impatient and exasperated? cite evidence from the text to support your answer.
Jonas is so adamant that Lily is not angry over the playground infraction because he knows that she would never get angry over something so minor.
Jonas is aware of Lily's kind personality and knows that she would never be truly angry at him. Jonas cites evidence from the text to support his opinion when he says, "But Lily wasn’t angry, I knew. Lily was never angry. She was impatient and exasperated sometimes, but she never got angry” (Lowry 54). This evidence shows that Jonas understands Lily and knows that her reactions are not rooted in anger, but rather in her own impatience and exasperation.
To learn more about Jonas and lily link is here
brainly.com/question/30747790
#SPJ4
Why is it important to apply for tertiary institutions while you are still at grade 11
It is important to apply for tertiary institutions while you are still in grade 11 because many universities and colleges have early admission programs that allow students to apply and receive a decision before the end of their senior year.
This gives students more time to plan for their future and make informed decisions about which school to attend. Additionally, applying early may increase your chances of getting accepted and receiving scholarships or financial aid. It also allows students to focus on their studies and senior year activities without the added stress of applying to colleges or universities
Learn more about tertiary institutions
https://brainly.com/question/30914264
#SPJ4