Answer: Land is important to Blacks and Hispanics alike for several reasons:
Cultural significance: Land is often deeply tied to cultural identity and history. For many Black and Hispanic communities, land has been an important part of their cultural heritage, and losing it would mean losing a part of their identity.
Economic stability: Owning land can provide economic stability, as it can be used for agriculture or to build homes and businesses. This can create a source of income for families and help to build wealth over time.
Access to resources: Land can also provide access to natural resources, such as water or minerals, which can be used for economic gain.
Political power: Owning land can also provide political power, as it can give individuals and communities a voice in decisions that affect their land and their lives.
Overall, land ownership is seen as a means of achieving economic, social, and political autonomy for both Blacks and Hispanics. It represents a way to build wealth and power, and to ensure that future generations have the resources they need to succeed.
Explanation:
What are the assumptions about the roles of women in this time period according to the song?
As long as they pay for it, the government can _________ a person's private ___________and use it for the public.
As long as they pay for it, the government can access a person's private property and use it for the public.
which of the following is true of the patrician order? a. only they could be landowners. b. only they could be elected to governmental offices. c. they determined who had the right of citizenship. d. only they could marry other plebeians; plebeians could not marry up. e. they were exempt from taxes.
Answer:
The correct option is b
Explanation:
only they could be elected to governmental offices.
The Patrician order was a social class of wealthy, powerful, and influential families in ancient Rome. Only Patricians could be elected to the highest governmental offices and held a monopoly on political power for much of the Roman Republic era. The Plebeians, on the other hand, were the lower class of common people, who were excluded from political power and had limited rights and privileges. Over time, the Plebeians gained more political power and representation, but the Patricians remained the dominant class in Roman society.
The other options listed are not accurate descriptions of the Patrician order. While the Patricians were typically landowners, this was not exclusive to their class (option a). The Patricians did not determine who had the right of citizenship, as citizenship was generally based on birth or other factors (option c). There were no restrictions on whom the Patricians could marry, and it was not necessary for Plebeians to marry up to become Patricians (option d). Finally, there is no evidence that Patricians were exempt from taxes (option e).
The true statement about the patrician order is that only they could be elected to governmental offices. The correct answer is Option B.
The Patricians were a privileged class of nobility in Ancient Rome. They were originally the aristocratic families of Rome that held office during the Roman Kingdom. Following the fall of the Roman Kingdom, they continued to hold an influential position in Roman politics, as well as the Roman Republic and Roman Empire.
The Patricians had a monopoly on governmental offices, such as serving as magistrates or sitting in the Roman Senate. Only the Patricians could hold these positions, and this system of government became known as the Patrician Republic. Therefore, the option b. only they could be elected to governmental offices is true of the patrician order.
Learn more about patrician order here: https://brainly.com/question/29036624
#SPJ11
what is one reason why this might be a credible source for understanding why african americans migrated to newark? what is one reason why this document might not be credible?
One reason why this might be a credible source for understanding why African Americans migrated to Newark is that the document is from a reliable and authoritative source. One reason why this document might not be credible is that it may be biased or incomplete in its information.
What is a credible source?
A credible source is one that is trusted and can be relied upon to provide accurate and reliable information. Such sources are usually authoritative and knowledgeable in their field, making them reliable sources of information on the topic at hand.
There are several reasons why a source might be considered credible. For example, the author may be an expert in the field or have extensive experience working in the area of interest.
Additionally, the source may be a respected organization or institution that is known for its high-quality research and analysis. Finally, the source may have been peer-reviewed or published in a reputable academic or professional journal.
What makes a source not credible?
There are several reasons why a source might not be considered credible. One of the most common reasons is that it is biased or incomplete in its information.
This can happen when the author has a vested interest in the outcome of the research or is attempting to manipulate the results to support a particular viewpoint.
Other reasons why a source might not be credible include the lack of reliable evidence to support its claims, a lack of transparency or openness about its research methods, and a failure to adhere to basic principles of scientific inquiry.
Ultimately, it is up to the reader to evaluate the credibility of a source and determine whether it is a reliable source of information.
To learn more about credible source, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/16530693
#SPJ11
HELPPPP 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST
Discussion Topic
The democratic republican system of government in the United States is defined by the US Constitution. As one of the longest lasting government documents in the world, Americans take pride in the stability and fairness of their governmental system. What makes the Constitution so remarkable was that it was written in the late 1700s yet still governs the country today. The Founding Fathers had no idea how the world would change when they wrote the original document. Scholars argue that they never intended for their form of government to last as long as it has without significant changes.
But what do you think? If you could do it all over again, what changes would you make to America’s form of government? Is our republican form of government ideal, or do we need a more democratic system of government? Would the US be better off with a little less democracy and a little bit more governmental authority? What about our system of federalism—do states have too much power or too little?
Please answer all questions In 1-2 paragraph(s). Make sure each of your answers addresses the question entirely, using proper language and grammar.
In the past few days I've learned a lot about our government. In this essay I will discuss my thoughts on our government.
To start off, I do think that our government needs some changes in it's running. for example the US government has a problem with privacy. The government is constantly collecting information on us to advertise products. This is not good. enough problem is that there's an ongoing debate between Democratic and Republican. in my opinion, I think both have benefits, and instead of debating, I think everybody should be entitled to their opinion, but they should politely disagree. another issue with our government is control. government is starting to become very controlling of its people. a country should be a place where all people are welcome and can do what they want as long as it's not hurting others or themselves. government makes things a certain way because of power. we can see this in certain States. some states have too much power while others have too little. I personally do not think this is fair. in my opinion, all states have the same text and laws. in conclusion, I think our government does need some changes.
between 1880 and 1930, lynch mobs murdered over 2,300 black men, women, and children whom we know of. what were the justifications given for the lynching of black men?
Answer:
Giving a white lady a wink being too "uppity" and assaulting a white lady
Explanation:
which scenario results from the lack of upwelling during an el niño period?
Answer:
During an El Niño period, there is a weakening or even a reversal of the normal east-to-west trade winds across the tropical Pacific Ocean, which leads to a warming of the surface waters in the eastern Pacific. This warming disrupts the upwelling of cold, nutrient-rich water along the coast of South America, which has significant effects on marine ecosystems and climate patterns.
The lack of upwelling during an El Niño period can have several consequences, including:
1. Reduced productivity of marine ecosystems: The nutrient-rich waters that normally upwell along the coast of South America support a rich food web, including plankton, fish, and marine mammals. When the upwelling is disrupted, there is a reduction in productivity, which can lead to lower fish populations and even mass die-offs of marine life.
2. Changes in weather patterns: The warming of the eastern Pacific during an El Niño period can lead to changes in weather patterns around the world, including droughts, floods, and changes in temperature.
3. Economic impacts: The reduced productivity of marine ecosystems and changes in weather patterns can have significant economic impacts on communities that rely on fishing and agriculture.
In summary, the lack of upwelling during an El Niño period can result in reduced productivity of marine ecosystems, changes in weather patterns, and economic impacts on communities that rely on fishing and agriculture.
This concept in renaissance though as well as art is defined as the principle of being detached from and/or neutral on matters of religion
The concept of religious neutrality during the Renaissance period was based on the idea that a person should not be judged based on their religious beliefs.
This concept was significant in the period of the Renaissance because it allowed for a more tolerant atmosphere and it was a way to free people from the religious persecution that had previously been so common.
This concept of religious neutrality was also important in the art of the Renaissance period as it allowed artists to create works with religious themes without worrying about offending people of different faiths. Religious neutrality was also a way to bridge the gap between different beliefs and it was a way to allow people to express their beliefs freely without fear of retribution.
To know more about Renaissance, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17646820
#SPJ4
what was one way mayor william b. hartsfield helped the development of atlanta?
Answer: Mayor Hartsfield helped establish Atlanta's first airport to advance the goal of the city to become an aviation of the hub of the Southeast.
Explanation:
What is the answer? Mine is wrong.
The purpose of this paragraph is to B. It provides the definition and time period of Reconstruction, which is expanded in greater detail later in the article.
What happened in Reconstruction according to the paragraph ?The purpose of this paragraph is to introduce the main themes and questions surrounding the period of Reconstruction following the Civil War.
It sets the stage for the rest of the article by outlining the major issues that needed to be addressed during this time, including the reintegration of the Confederacy into the Union, the role of Congress and the president in setting policy, and the status of freed blacks in the South. By posing these questions, the paragraph creates a sense of the complexity and uncertainty of the period, and highlights the difficult decisions that had to be made in order to rebuild the United States after the war.
Find out more on Reconstruction at https://brainly.com/question/22701243
#SPJ1
What kind of problems would state governments try to solve
Answer:
State governments have a wide range of responsibilities and try to solve many different kinds of problems. Some common areas where state governments focus their efforts include:
1. Education: State governments are responsible for funding and overseeing public education, including K-12 schools and public universities. They work to ensure that all students have access to quality education, regardless of their background or location.
2. Healthcare: State governments play a key role in regulating and funding healthcare services within their borders. They may operate their own healthcare programs, such as Medicaid, and work to ensure that residents have access to affordable healthcare.
3. Infrastructure: State governments are responsible for building and maintaining infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and public transportation systems. They work to ensure that their infrastructure is safe, efficient, and able to support economic growth.
4. Public safety: State governments are responsible for maintaining law and order within their borders. They oversee law enforcement agencies, regulate firearms, and work to prevent and respond to natural disasters and other emergencies.
5. Economic development: State governments work to create an environment that is conducive to economic growth and job creation. They may offer tax incentives to businesses, invest in infrastructure, and support workforce development programs.
These are just a few examples of the kinds of problems that state governments try to solve. The specific priorities of each state government may vary depending on local needs and priorities.
Answer:
schools, hospitals, conservation and environment, roads, railways and public transport, public works,
Why were southern states opposed to California entering the union as a free state?
Answer:
In the mid-19th century, the admission of California as a free state was a major political issue in the United States. Southern states were opposed to California's admission as a free state for several reasons:
The balance of power in the Senate: The admission of California as a free state would have upset the balance of power in the Senate, where there were an equal number of free and slave states. Southern states feared that if California entered as a free state, it would tip the balance of power in favor of the free states, which could then pass legislation that would threaten slavery.
Economic interests: Southern states were heavily dependent on the labor of enslaved Africans to work their large plantations. They believed that the admission of California as a free state would set a precedent for other new states to also become free, thus reducing the number of slave states and potentially leading to the eventual abolition of slavery.
Sectional tensions: The issue of slavery was becoming increasingly divisive between the North and South, and the admission of California as a free state would have only heightened these tensions. Southern states feared that a strong anti-slavery sentiment in the North would lead to further restrictions on slavery, ultimately threatening their way of life.
Overall, the southern states were opposed to California's admission as a free state because they feared that it would weaken their political power, threaten their economic interests, and lead to the eventual abolition of slavery.
Answer:
Adding California as a free state would mean that there would be more free states than slave states
Explanation:
What were the most important reasons for Union victory and Confederate defeat?
The most important reasons for the Union victory and Confederate defeat during the American Civil War were:
1. Superior resources: The Union had a larger population, which allowed them to field a bigger army, and also had a more developed industrial base to supply their troops with weapons, ammunition, and other necessary materials.
2. Effective strategy:
The Union implemented the Anaconda Plan, which aimed to blockade the Confederate coast, control the Mississippi River, and divide the Confederacy into smaller, more manageable pieces. This strategy helped to weaken the Confederate economy and hinder their war efforts.
3. Strong leadership:
The Union eventually found strong military leaders, such as Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman, who were able to successfully execute their strategies and defeat Confederate forces in key battles.
4. International support:
The Union was able to maintain the support of European powers like Britain and France, preventing them from recognizing and aiding the Confederacy, which limited the Confederacy's access to foreign aid and resources.
5. Internal divisions:
The Confederacy faced internal divisions and lack of unity, which weakened their overall war effort.
Some states were more committed to the cause than others, and there were disagreements about the role of central government in the Confederacy.
These factors combined to give the Union the advantage in the Civil War, ultimately leading to their victory and the Confederate defeat.
For similar question on Union.
https://brainly.com/question/881501
#SPJ11
which of these tactics did martin luther king jr. and the southern christian leadership conference use most effectively in their struggle to win equal rights for african americans?
Through collective action, such as rallies, demonstrations, strikes, and noncooperation, unarmed individuals engage in conflict utilising nonviolent resistance to gain political advantage and gain control over the situation.
The Poor People's Campaign was launched by the SCLC in 1967 as part of an expansion of its agenda to address issues of economic injustice. The organization's first president, Martin Luther King Jr., presided over it from its inception until his murder in 1968. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was founded in 1957 to direct the actions of regional protest organisations all throughout the South with the aim of reclaiming "the soul of America" via peaceful resistance (King, "Beyond Vietnam," 144).
To know more about strikes, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28540158
#SPJ4
how do you think the second red scare and mccarthyism impacted american politics in the 1950s and beyond?
The Second Red Scare and McCarthyism had a significant impact on American politics in the 1950s and beyond. It led to a climate of fear and suspicion that resulted in the persecution and blacklisting of thousands of people who were accused of being communists or communist sympathizers.
One of the most significant impacts of McCarthyism was the erosion of civil liberties and the suppression of political dissent. The fear of being labeled a communist led to self-censorship and the curtailment of freedom of speech and association. This climate of fear also led to the formation of loyalty oaths and investigations into people's political beliefs, which had a chilling effect on the free exchange of ideas.
Moreover, McCarthyism had a lasting impact on American politics by contributing to the rise of the conservative movement in the United States. The anti-communist hysteria created by McCarthyism fueled a growing conservatism that rejected progressive policies and ideas. This led to a shift in the political landscape, as conservative politicians gained more power and influence, and progressive ideas were marginalized.
Finally, the Second Red Scare and McCarthyism also had an impact on American foreign policy, as it led to a more aggressive and interventionist stance towards communist countries. The fear of communist infiltration and the desire to contain communism led to a series of interventions and conflicts, such as the Korean War and the Vietnam War.
In conclusion, the Second Red Scare and McCarthyism had a significant impact on American politics in the 1950s and beyond, leading to the erosion of civil liberties, the rise of conservatism, and a more aggressive foreign policy. It serves as a reminder of the dangers of political extremism, fear, and intolerance, and the need to protect and defend democratic values and principles.
Combine the sentences.
I rode my bike to baseball practice after school. A large dog chased me.
Here is a good description of how to use the provided sentence correctly:
I was being pursued by a big dog as I rode my bike to baseball practice after school.What exactly is a sentence combination?The use of different sentences and their structures to make a piece of writing much more interesting and entertaining for the reader is known as sentence mixing.The right sentence construction makes the author's thoughts and ideas more obvious to the audience and clearer to the reader, as indicated by the context of this inquiry.The only method that allows for an audience-author dialogue is this one. To "smooth out" rough language and make a piece of writing more interesting for the reader, sentence combining is a strategy. Just combining sentences by adding a conjunction, as in the "I went to the park" example.To learn more about sentence combination, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29424277
What have been the effects of the increasing level of negativity in campaigning?
(at least 4 sentences)
Positive advertisements used to counteract negative advertisements lack the power of negative ads, according to University of Georgia researchers.
What effect does negative marketing have?In recent decades, research on negative campaigning has expanded rapidly. This article looks at the research on this campaign strategy. It discusses its definition and measurement, highlighting the disparity between academic research and common perceptions. After that, it examines the reasons parties and candidates "go negative," with a focus on the reasons for negative campaigning in multi-party competition. The composition further talks about the writing on constituent impacts and more extensive cultural results of negative battling and underlines issues connected with information assortment and examination plans. The end sums up the best in class and layouts roads for future examination.
To learn more about advertisements visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29564877
#SPJ1
Read this prompt for an argumentative essay.
In each state, citizens elect state senators who vote on important issues, including education, transportation, and workplace safety. Americans gain the right to vote at age 18. At that time, citizens are strongly encouraged to vote. However, they are not required to vote. Should voting be mandatory at the state level? Write an argumentative essay to address this issue.
The topic of the essay is
-the minimum voting age.
-a compulsory voting law.
-the work of state senators.
-state law versus federal law
Anyone help pls:)
The essay's subject is whether voting should be required at the state level. The minimum voting age, the duties of state senators, or state versus federal law are not mentioned in the prompt.
Which of the following best sums up an argumentative essay's introduction?Which of the following statements best sums up an argumentative essay's introduction. The introduction introduces readers to the subject and lays out the concepts that will be discussed.
What are the key components of an argumentative essay's introduction?In the first paragraph of an argument essay, students should briefly discuss the issue to give background information. The next step is for the author to discuss why the topic is important or why readers should be concerned about the issue.
To know more about federal law visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/20725804
#SPJ1
Who successfully challenged the "white primary" law in Texas that prevented AfricanAmericans from voting in the Texas Democratic primary?A. Emma Tenayuca BrooksB. Dr. Lawrence NixonC. Wilbert Lee O'DanielD. Miriam Amanda Ferguson
A. Emma Tenayuca Brooks successfully challenged the “white primary” law in Texas that prevented African Americans from voting in the Texas Democratic primary.
In the mid 1930s, Emma Tenayuca, a labor organizer and civil rights activist, organized a strike of over 15,000 workers in San Antonio. Her activism against discrimination and the oppressive living conditions of Mexican Americans, led to her involvement in the battle to desegregate the Texas Democratic primary. She successfully challenged the “white primary” law that had prevented African Americans from voting in the Texas Democratic primary since 1923. In 1939, the US Supreme Court ruled in Smith v Allwright that the “white primary” law was unconstitutional. Thanks to Emma Tenayuca’s activism, African Americans were finally able to participate in the Texas Democratic primary.Thus,the correct answer is Option-A: Emma Tenayuca.
For such more questions on white primary law :
brainly.com/question/14957337
#SPJ11
What is the most famous shipwreck in Lake Huron?
The most popular wreck in Lake Huron wooden yacht barge Ironton, sank after a crash in 1894, killing five group individuals. Bound Vessel and Its Unused Raft Are Found at the Lower part of Lake Huron.
In 1894, a yacht barge called Ironton crashed into an Extraordinary Lakes vessel called Ohio in Lake Huron's scandalous "Wreck Back street." Ohio's disaster area was founded in 2017 by a campaign coordinated by the Public Maritime and Barometrical Organization's (NOAA) Thunder Straight Public Marine Safe-haven.
As per the record of enduring crew member William Wooley, it was excessively dim to detect Ohio until it was past the point of no return, and Ironton hit the liner with its starboard bow, tearing a 12-foot wide opening in Ohio's frame.
Learn more about Lake Huron:
https://brainly.com/question/14539284
#SPJ4
the agricultural methods implemented in the third case study could be directly applied to reduce the threat from all of the following environmental or economic challenges that arose during the twentieth century except
The acquisition of nuclear weapons by states or terrorist groups is referred to as nuclear proliferation.
Agriculture has a positive impact on everyone's quality of life, especially the poorest ones, in an environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable way. A continuous difficulty facing all of the world's countries, regardless of their level of economic growth, is achieving financial stability. Making Sustainable Development Possible. Section II: Shared Problems III. A Sustainable Global Economy IV. Several case studies showed how it is possible to combine economic growth with sustainable development, even in the least developed nations. the capacity of sustainable agriculture for coping with climate change.
To know more about nuclear proliferation, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14991422
#SPJ4
What do you think the purpose of black code was?
To enforce racial segregation and limit the voting power of Black people, the southern United States implemented Jim Crow laws and Black codes at various times. Some states implemented black codes after the Civil War ended in 1865, severely limiting the rights of African people, many of whom had been held as slaves.
What is meant by racial segregation?The systematic division of people into racial or other ethnic groupings in daily life is known as racial segregation. According to the Rome Declaration and Statute of the International Criminal Court from 2002, racial segregation can qualify as an international crime of apartheid and a crime against humanity. Segregation occurs when people are kept apart from one another due to factors like race, gender, sexual orientation, or ethnicity.Racial segregation is one of many different sorts of segregation, which can include self-imposed separation, subtler forms of prejudice, deliberate and systematic persecution, and more.Separation is what is meant by segregation. Due to the frequent unfair treatment of one group of people, it frequently constitutes discrimination.To learn more about racial segregation, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1574751
The supreme court case of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) dealt with which constitutional principle?
Answer:
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own. The case extended the right to counsel, which had been found under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to impose requirements on the federal government, by imposing those requirements upon the states as well.
Explanation:
the presidencies of kennedy and johnson quick check
What happened to end John F. Kennedy's presidency?
He resigned due to a scandal of abuse of power and obstruction of justice
He was impeached for improper behavior.
He was assassinated in Dallas, Texas.
He left office after only four years after being defeated.
Kennedy was killed on November 22, 1963, in Dallas. Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy's vice president, took over as president after his passing.
What was the end of John F. Kennedy's presidency?
While in power, Kennedy put increased federal spending, tax cuts, and domestic economic development as his top priorities. The Bay of Pigs invasion and the Cuban Missile Crisis were two foreign policy disasters that the United States faced during Kennedy's brief administration.
After Kennedy was killed on November 22, 1963, Johnson took office as the 36th President of the United States with the goal of creating "A Great Society" for the citizens of the United States.
The United States space program was dramatically expanded by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, and he set an ambitious aim for the country to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade.
Learn more about John F. Kennedy:
https://brainly.com/question/1577421
#SPJ1
What was the centerpiece of Johnsons Great Society?
Answer:
The centerpiece of the War on Poverty was the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, which created an Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) to oversee a variety of community-based antipoverty programs
Booker T. Washington served the Black community by:
A. becoming a politician who worked to close the gap in white
inequality.
B. becoming a source of controversy regarding his comments about
inequality.
C. becoming the most influential Black leader in the United States.
D. becoming an influential teacher who helped design schools.
The ideal choice is option C, who is quickly rising to prominence as a Black leader in the US.
Booker T. Washington: who is he?American educator, writer, orator, and advisor to several presidents of the United States, Booker Taliaferro Washington (April 5, 1856 – November 14, 1925) was born in the United States. Washington dominated the African-American community, sometimes known as the Black elite, between 1890 and 1915. The last black American statesman to be born into slavery, Washington became the prominent advocate for former slaves and their descendants. Disenfranchisement and the Jim Crow laws, which were passed in the Southern states after Reconstruction in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, led to their newfound oppression in the South.
to know about Booker T Washington visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13721792
#SPJ1
What policy did the US government use to increase the size of the military after the United States entered World War I and why did some Americans object?
The US government implemented conscription as a policy to increase the size of the military after entering World War I. However, some Americans objected to the policy of conscription. One of the reasons for this was that they felt it violated their individual freedom.
The conscription, also known as the Selective Service Act, was signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson in 1917. It required all men between the ages of 21 and 30 to register for the draft, and later the age range was extended to include all men between the ages of 18 and 45. The aim of conscription was to recruit a larger number of soldiers and improve the quality of the military. It was also an attempt to ensure that all social classes were represented in the military. The US government believed that conscription would ensure a fair distribution of the burden of the war.
Some people believed that they should have the right to decide whether or not they wanted to fight in the war. Others argued that the policy was unfair because it forced the poor and working-class men to fight while the rich and influential people could buy their way out of the draft. Moreover, some ethnic groups were exempted from the draft, which made the policy discriminatory. For example, African Americans and Native Americans were not drafted in large numbers.
Another factor that contributed to the objections was the anti-war sentiment among some Americans. They believed that the US should stay out of the war and focus on domestic issues. They saw the policy of conscription as a means to force them to fight in a war that they did not support. In summary, while the policy of conscription increased the size of the military during World War I, it was met with resistance from some Americans who objected to its implementation.
To know more about Conscription:
https://brainly.com/question/28271967
#SPJ11
what was the reasons for conflict between the united states army and the texas indians in texas after the civil war?
The edict was justified on the grounds that numerous indigenous tribes, including the Cherokee, were farming and establishing peaceful settlements.
The various wars were caused by a variety of factors, the most prevalent of which was the desire of settlers and governments for the lands of Indian tribes. Other tribes, such as the Comanche and Kiowa, continued to live in that portion of the Indian Territories that was the Comancheria while raiding white settlements in Texas. In order to wage war against one another's colonial outposts, the European powers and their colonies also recruited allied Indian tribes. During the time, millions of native Americans had settled in North America in hundreds of distinct tribes.
To know more about indigenous tribes, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29527356
#SPJ4
what revolutionary war battle, a british victory over an american garrison, occurred about 30 miles from montreal, canada?
The Battle of Quebec is the revolutionary war battle, a British victory over an American garrison, which occurred about 30 miles from Montreal, Canada.
Early in the American Revolutionary War, on December 31, 1775, American Continental Army forces engaged British defenses of Quebec City in the Battle of Quebec. The Americans suffered significant losses in combat, which marked their first significant setback in the conflict.
British triumph finally ended the war. The majority of American forces were compelled to retreat before reaching the city limits due to Quebec's formidable defences. The American forces that made it into the city found themselves unorganized as a blizzard impaired their visibility. These conditions made it necessary for the Patriots to flee.
The American campaign in Canada was put to a stop by the disasters in Quebec. The Patriots failed to convince French Canadians to support their cause, and they also lost a lot of men while trying. These attempts to invade Canada resulted in some of the best American officers and militiamen being hurt, killed, and captured, along with severe losses for the American army.
To learn more about Battle of Quebec, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/22137911
#SPJ4
What were the Advantage and disadvantages of maintaining alliances in ww1