Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.
During the middle of the 19th century, an American militia member was found to be a British spy who was sent to the United States by the King England. Since he was found to be a traitor, he became an American political prisoner. What sort of punishment was he MOST LIKELY sentenced to, given the time and place of his crime and sentence?
Rehabilitation
Capital punishment
Incarceration
deterrence
Answer:
dont listen to them the answer is Incarceration
Explanation:Incarceration took test
Which description of government most supports John Locke’s belief on the Social Contract Theory?
governments must control people to secure people’s safety
rulers should have power over the governed as seen fit by god
rights and responsibilities are a main duty of citizenship
states exist to serve their people
Answer: I think its c, "rights and responsibilities are a main duty of citizenship"
Explanation: I might be wrong so make sure this is the right answer
which of the following is a correct statement of federal preemption of state law under the supremacy clause? choose 2 answers.
The correct statements of federal preemption of state law under the Supremacy Clause include:
A state law that requires documentation of citizenship is preempted by the National Voter Registration Act because the act only requires a statement under oath.A state's attempt to regulate television and radio is preempted by federal law because the federal government has regulated the entire field.The Supremacy Clause is a provision in Article VI of the Constitution that states that the treaties and constitution laws of the United States are the supreme law of the land.
Under the Supremacy Clause, it should be noted that both state and local laws that conflict with federal laws are rendered invalid. The preemption in the Supremacy Clause is that federal law over state law.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25261982
What did Marshall mean by the phrase "It is emphatically
the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say
what the law is"?
Answer:
Marshall meant that the Judicial Department was responsible for interpreting the laws, or overruling unconstitutional laws.
Explanation:
It's the purpose of the judicial branch which is what the quote says and what the question asks.
how have the three branches of goverment applied the constitution
Answer:
The Constitution created the 3 branches of government: The Legislative Branch to make the laws. ... The Executive Branch to enforce the laws. The Judicial Branch to interpret the laws.
the first amendment does not protect commercial speech as extensively as noncommercial speech. true or false?
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
I think I am not too sure
and if you get it wrong don't blame me
Can someone help me with my assignment pls it’s legal issues HELP
Answer:
Yessss
Explanation:
Show me the picture
How does the prosecution fulfill its purpose in a case?
Explanation:
The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against an individual accused of breaking the law. Typically, the prosecutor represents the state or the government in the case brought against the accused person.
A monarchy can be considered a _________ government or it can be limited by a constitution and be part of a democracy.
Totalitarian
Democratic
Oligarchic
Anarchic
Answer:
Anarchic
Explanation:
a government with a king/queen that makes all the decisions
IF someone is treating you do you have the right to sue him or her
Answer:
how is the person treating u
what law enables citizens to obtain information from the government about a subject of interest when a written request is made?
What is one reason to keep detailed patient records?
A. To help protect against malpractice cases and damages
B. To have proof that the patient consents to treatment
C. To justify a breach of duty when it is called for
D. To share them publicly if the patient becomes problematic
One of the reasons that it is important to keep the patients record is due to the fact that it would help To have proof that the patient consents to treatment.
What is meant by patients record?This is the term that is used to describe the existing records that the people in the clinic that would have to present in order to get administered to in the hospital.
The patients record is known to have the history of the patient in terms of their health and it also states the treatments that they have been taking over a period of time.
The medical records are very important because in it is a consent form that shows that the patient has consented to the treatment that they are to receive. Also it would contain all of the information that they are to know about the course of treatment that they are to follow.
Hence we would say that the reason that the patients records are kept is so that they are shown to consent to treatment.
Read more on patients record here: https://brainly.com/question/1561727
#SPJ1
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I just took the test
The defendant, Mr. Young, age 17, was convicted in a US District Court of treason and given a sentence of life without parole. He appealed his conviction to a US Court of Appeal on the grounds that a sentence of life without parole for a juvenile is unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment. The court of appeals affirmed his conviction of him. What court could he appeal to next and why?
Answer:
U.S Supreme Court
Explanation:
major scandals at enron, worldcom, and tyco led to the passage of which law in 2002?
Answer:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,response to financial scandals in the early 2000s involving publicly traded companies
Explanation:
3 branches of government poem.
Answer:
the 3 branches of government are legislative, executive, and judicial.
Explanation:
why do party activists tend to devote their time to politics?
Answer:
Likely, the causes their party fights for are important to them personally, and they are passionate about the subject.
what protections are guaranteed by the fifth amendment?
Answer:
The Fifth Amendment creates a number of rights relevant to both criminal and civil legal proceedings. In criminal cases, the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury, forbids “double jeopardy,” and protects against self-incrimination
To become a legal U.S citizen, the United States has
A) five distinct paths
B) two paths
C) 50 paths, one per state
D) only one path
Answer:
B. Two paths.
Explanation:
generally, how many supreme court justices have to agree to review a case from the us courts of appeals?
Answer:
Four out of Nine need to agree
which amendment outlawed the manufacture, sale, transportation, import, or export of alcoholic beverages?
Answer:
the 18th Amendment
Explanation:
one of the legal definitions of intoxication in texas
Answer:
Texas Penal Code §49.01(2) – “'Intoxicated' means: (A) not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance into the body;
Explanation:
from the web because i could not exsplain it better but here you go
What are two broad categories of tort remedies?
O A. Damages and writs
O B. Temporary and permanent injunctions
O C. Damages and compensation
O D. Damages and injunctions
Answer:
the answer is C maybe..
i not sure
the exclusionary rule developed out of which supreme court case?
Answer:
Mapp v. Ohio
Explanation:
Hope this was helpful
how often is the number of congressional districts determined
Answer:
the number is determined every ten years.
First Aid Basics - Assessment II
Which of the following is NOT a cause of burns?
O Thermal
Chemical
Mechanical
O Poison
Answer:
It's C: mechanical
What is the difference between malpractice and general negligence?
A. Malpractice holds people to a standard of professional care rather
than the reasonable person test.
B. Malpractice has legal consequences, while general negligence
does not
C. General negligence is between two people, while malpractice is
between multiple people.
D. General negligence holds people to a standard of professional
care rather than the reasonable person test.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Explain 2 ways that gravity can be limited
PLZZZ HELLPPP 1. The cases of cybercrime that we know about have been described as just "the tip of the iceberg." Using details from the lesson, do you consider this description accurate? Why or why not?
Describing known cybercrimes as "the tip of the iceberg" is completely accurate.
Cybercrimes include any type of crime that occurs through a computer or through a computer network. The most common cybercrimes include:
Cyberextortion.Internet fraud.Identity theft.Malware.Phishing scams.In the last years, cybercrimes have increased as the internet is used all around the world. Similarly, the reports of cybercrime have increased.
Despite this, it is believed the number of cases reported only represent a small percentage of all real cases. This means reports are just "the tip of the iceberg" as the real problem is hidden. In the same way, most serious cases might not be known.
Note: This question is incomplete because the information from the lesson is not included; however, I answered it based on general knowledge.
anna nicole smith
Who should hold jurisdiction in the case?
Should Anna get the money?
Answer:
her son , yes because she is intialed to the money
Explanation:
During a bank robbery, one of the robbers shoots and kills one of the bank clerks. Not
being involved in the actual murder or robbery, would the get-away driver get charged
with murder? If so, what kind?
Answer:
Yes. (Sort of)
Explanation:
In Illinois at least. Probably Depends on the state. But here is a exerpt from a IL Law website: "Because Under this rule, people can be—and often are—convicted of first-degree murder in scenarios where a death is unintentional or is caused by another person, all in the commission of a different type of crime. That type of crime is defined as a “forcible felony.”