Liberals in Latin America faced several challenges in their efforts to promote political and economic reforms during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Some of the main troubles that liberals experienced included the opposition from conservative elites.
What was the impact of liberal reforms?Liberal reforms threatened the power and privileges of conservative elites who had traditionally dominated political and economic life in Latin America. These elites often used their wealth, influence, and control of the military to resist liberal reforms.
Therefore, the struggle between liberals and conservatives in Latin America was a complex and dynamic process that shaped the political and economic development of the region.
Find out more about Latin America History on:
https://brainly.com/question/25913173
#SPJ1
Quote: “what is good in itself glorifies god because it reflects god”
Who does this statement refer to?
The statement, "what is good in itself glorifies God because it reflects God" is a theological concept that emphasizes the belief that goodness is a reflection of God's character and nature.
It is a common belief among many religious traditions that goodness is a divine attribute, and that humans can reflect this goodness in their actions and behaviors. The statement is often attributed to theologians and religious leaders who have sought to explain the relationship between God and human goodness. One prominent figure who emphasized this idea was Saint Augustine, a Christian theologian and philosopher who lived in the fourth and fifth centuries. Augustine believed that all goodness comes from God, and that humans can only achieve true goodness by reflecting God's goodness in their lives. The idea that goodness reflects God is also found in many other religious traditions, such as Judaism, Islam, and Buddhism. In Judaism, for example, the concept of tikkun olam (repairing the world) is based on the belief that humans have a responsibility to reflect God's goodness by doing good works in the world. In Islam, the concept of ihsan (excellence) emphasizes the importance of doing good deeds in a way that reflects God's goodness and mercy.
To know more about religious traditions:
https://brainly.com/question/14731834
#SPJ1
regarding the railroads, what agency took over the duties of the icc after the interstate commerce commission termination act (iccta) of 1995?
The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA) of 1995 abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) and transferred its functions to the Surface Transportation Board of the United States Department of Transportation.
Regarding the railroads, the Surface Transportation Board (STB) took over the duties of the ICC after the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA) of 1995.What is the Surface Transportation Board (STB)?The Surface Transportation Board (STB) is a governing body that regulates transportation in the United States of America. It was formed in 1996 as a result of the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA), which was passed in 1995. The STB was created to manage various forms of transport such as railways, trucking, and waterborne commerce, among others.The Surface Transportation Board (STB) took over the duties of the ICC after the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA) of 1995. The act abolished the ICC and established a board that was intended to provide a more streamlined regulatory framework for surface transportation.In general, the STB is responsible for regulating railroad rates, services, and practices, as well as ensuring that these practices are fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory. Additionally, the STB is in charge of resolving railroad-related disputes and enforcing railroad laws and regulations.
For more such questions on Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act
https://brainly.com/question/1845372
#SPJ11
How was Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union similar to his invasion of France?
• He relied heavily on the speed, size and power of the German military.
• He used air power to subdue the enemy quickly.
• He bombed cities to demoralize the population.
• He invaded nearby countries first to prove German power.
Answer:
How was Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union similar to his invasion of France? He relied heavily on the size and power of German troops. He used air power to subdue the enemy quickly. He bombed cities to demoralize the population.
Explanation:
Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union and his invasion of France had some similarities. One similarity was the heavy reliance on the speed, size, and power of the German military to overwhelm their opponents quickly. Hence option A is correct.
How was Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union similar to his invasion of France ?In both campaigns, Hitler used air power to subdue the enemy and gain a tactical advantage. He also employed the tactic of bombing cities to demoralize the population and undermine the enemy's ability to fight back effectively.
Additionally, Hitler invaded nearby countries first to prove Germany's military prowess before turning his attention to larger targets. In the case of France, he invaded Belgium and the Netherlands before launching an all-out attack on France. Similarly, he invaded Poland before launching his attack on the Soviet Union.
Despite these similarities, there were also significant differences between the two campaigns. The invasion of France was a relatively short and decisive campaign, while the invasion of the Soviet Union was a prolonged and costly conflict that ultimately ended in defeat for Germany.
Additionally, Hitler's goals and objectives in each campaign were different, with France being a stepping stone to achieving his larger ambitions in Europe, while the Soviet Union was a separate and distinct objective.
Learn more about invasion of France here
https://brainly.com/question/1510397
#SPJ5
the first theme group of the second exposition of a concerto features a
rondo recapitulation baryton modulation
The first theme group of the second exposition of a concerto features a rondo.A concerto is a classical music piece that features a solo instrument, accompanied by an orchestra.
A concerto is a multi-movement work with an instrumental soloist, typically in three movements. It is usually composed of three movements: fast, slow, and fast. It is a musical composition for an orchestra and one or more solo instruments.The first theme group of the second exposition of a concerto features a rondo. Rondo is a musical form in which a specific section of music is repeated three or more times, separated by contrasting sections. The structure is generally A-B-A-C-A-D-A or A-B-A-C-A-B-A.
The rondo form is commonly used in the final movements of classical sonatas, string quartets, and symphonies.The exposition is the first section of a sonata, concerto, or symphony. The exposition sets the stage for the rest of the piece, introducing the primary themes and tonal centers. It comprises of two distinct themes and a closing theme, which is referred to as the transition theme.
Learn more about recapitulation baryton modulation here:https://brainly.com/question/29612038
#SPJ11
true or false the mst succesdul democracies are usually based on some form od absolutism
False. Successful democracies are not based on absolutism.
Why is it?
Absolutism refers to a political system where a single individual or group holds absolute power and authority over the state, with no checks and balances to limit their power.
This system is antithetical to democracy, which is based on the principles of representation, accountability, and popular sovereignty. Historically, successful democracies have emerged through a variety of means, including revolutions, social movements, and peaceful transitions of power.
These democracies are characterized by constitutional frameworks that guarantee individual rights and civil liberties, as well as institutions that provide for the separation of powers and the rule of law.
To know more about Democracy related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ9
Who referred to Harriet Beecher Stowe as “the little woman who wrote that book made this Great War”? What “Great War” was referring to?
Answer:
The quote you are referring to comes from a statement made by Abraham Lincoln in 1862 when he met Harriet Beecher Stowe, author of the anti-slavery novel "Uncle Tom's Cabin". However, he did not specifically refer to any "Great War" in the quote. The American Civil War (1861-1865) may have been considered a "great war" during that time period, as it was a significant conflict in American history and caused widespread casualties and devastation.
Where did Socialism get its start?
which is paul's epistle called the magna carta of christian liberty and the declaration of independence?
Paul's epistle which is called the magna carta of Christian liberty and the declaration of independence is the Epistle to the Galatians.
What is Paul's Epistle?Paul's epistle is a letter written by Paul to a community or individuals. Paul's epistles in the New Testament of the Bible have been credited with having contributed to the development of Christian doctrine and theology.In the New Testament, Paul wrote several letters to various communities in various regions.
These letters, commonly known as Paul's epistles, are considered one of the most significant contributions to the development of Christian theology and doctrine.
What is the Epistle to the Galatians?The Epistle to the Galatians is the letter that the Apostle Paul wrote to the early Christian community in Galatia, a region in modern-day Turkey.
This letter is notable because of its emphasis on Christian liberty, grace, and the role of the law in the Christian faith. It is also considered a magna carta of Christian liberty and the declaration of independence since it teaches that Christians are saved through faith in Jesus Christ, rather than adherence to the law.
It emphasizes the importance of the Christian faith and asserts that the law no longer holds power over believers, setting the stage for the development of Christian theology and doctrine.
In conclusion, Paul's epistle, the Epistle to the Galatians, is called the magna carta of Christian liberty and the declaration of independence. It emphasizes Christian liberty, grace, and the role of the law in the Christian faith.
To know more about Epistle to the Galatians, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/22977033#
#SPJ11
What can be learned from the Wocester V. Georgia case? Answer this in the claim, evidence, reasoning style
The Worcester v. Georgia case teaches us the value of defending oppressed groups' sovereignty and the bearing of judicial rulings on larger social and political challenges.
Claim: The Worcester v. Georgia ruling established the rule of law that Native American tribes are sovereign countries with the right to self-government.
Evidence: In the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee Nation, holding that the state of Georgia lacked the right to regulate or meddle in Cherokee affairs. According to the Supreme Court, Native American tribes are "distinct political communities" with sovereignty on par with that of the United States and are solely subject to the jurisdiction of the federal government.
Reasoning: The Worcester v. Georgia case was a landmark judgement that acknowledged Native American tribes' sovereignty and upheld their right to self-governance. As a result of the decision, it was acknowledged that Native American tribes were not subject to state laws and could not be ejected forcibly from their territories by state officials. This ruling had a significant impact on how the US government interacted with Native American tribes, and it served as the basis for later legal developments like the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act, which acknowledged tribes' constitutional and governmental rights. Ultimately, the Worcester v. Georgia decision set a significant legal precedent that supported Native American tribes' rights and interests while also acknowledging their sovereignty.
To know more about Worcester v. Georgia case
brainly.com/question/22728395
#SPJ4
a(n) is an individual who was given land in a spanish territory in exchange for recruiting new settlers.
A colonist is an individual who was given land in Spanish territory in exchange for recruiting new settlers. Colonists were a major part of the Spanish colonial empire in the 16th to 19th centuries.
In the 16th century, the Spanish Crown sought to extend their control over the New World by offering settlers land and rewards in exchange for helping the Crown establish colonies.
In return, the settlers promised to pay taxes to the Crown, follow the laws of the land, and respect the local indigenous people. The settlers were also responsible for recruiting new settlers, as well as providing food, shelter, and other necessary resources to their new colony.
In some cases, colonists were given title to the land they settled on, though this was not always the case. In general, the Spanish Crown had strict control over the settlers and the colonies, and it was the Crown's responsibility to ensure that the colonies remained prosperous.
This often led to a high degree of taxation and a highly regimented lifestyle for the colonists.
Despite this, many Spanish colonies were successful in their own right, and their influence is still felt today. Colonists were a major part of Spanish colonial life and helped to establish a strong foothold for the Spanish in the New World.
To know more about Spanish colonial empire refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/14333222#
#SPJ11
Which two of these items were requirements that the Berlin Conference imposed on European nations claiming colonies in Africa?
Answer: notifying other European nations when taking possession of African territories actively occupying the territory, as shown by a flag and keeping a police force
Explanation: this is all i can find i hope its what your looking for
How did the cotton gin affect the South slaves in their Food, Shelter, Clothing, Family Life, Work Activities, Punishments, and Special Occasions?
The cotton gin increased the workload of the slaves and led to poor living conditions.
How the cotton gin affected the South slavesThe cotton gin, invented by Eli Whitney in 1793, increased the demand for cotton and led to the expansion of slavery in the South.
It made cotton production more efficient, it also increased the workload for slaves who were forced to pick more cotton.
Slave owners invested less in the welfare of their slaves as they were viewed as a disposable workforce.
Slaves faced poor living conditions, inadequate clothing, and limited access to food.
Their family life was disrupted as families were frequently separated. Punishments were severe and included whipping and branding. Special occasions were limited to those approved by slave owners.
Read more about cotton gin at:
https://brainly.com/question/10763472
#SPJ1
The President has to follow the law like everyone else. Even the President can go to jail if found guilty of a serious crime. Which principle of government is this?
A.) Popular sovereignty
B.) Rule of law
C.) Limited government
D.) Majority Rule
Option (b), Like everyone else, the President is required to abide by the law. Even the President might be imprisoned if convicted of a serious crime. The fundamental tenet of government is the rule of law.
What exactly is the "rule of law"?All people and institutions within a country, state, or community, including legislators and authorities, must abide by the same laws, according to the political premise of the rule of law.
A system, technique, institution, practice, or custom known as the "rule of law" protects the equality of all individuals before the law, ensures that power is not used arbitrarily by the government, and often outlaws such conduct.
Who is the author of the concept of the rule of law?Explanation: In his influential work "The Law and the Constitution," which was published in 1885, A.V. Dicey introduced the concept of the Rule of Law.
Learn more about rule of law: https://brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ1
american farmers in the 1920s: group of answer choices managed to remain in business due to time-saving mechanization. understood that prices for produce would remain high, despite the end of world war i. decreased their output of crops, due to declining demand on the american and overseas markets. increasingly migrated out of rural areas. did not take advantage of new technological innovations.
"American farmers in the 1920s are migrated out of rural areas in search of other work opportunities. However, some farmers managed to stay in business due to time-saving mechanization.
American farmers in the 1920s managed to remain in business due to time-saving mechanization. Despite the end of World War I, they understood that prices for produce would remain high.
However, they decreased their output of crops due to declining demand on the American and overseas markets.
Additionally, they increasingly migrated out of rural areas and did not take advantage of new technological innovations. What were some of the difficulties that American farmers faced in the 1920s?In the 1920s, American farmers faced several challenges.
The introduction of new technology made farming easier and more efficient, which led to a drop in crop prices. Crop prices fell due to the decrease in demand from the European countries that were involved in World War I as a result of the war ending.
Moreover, many farmers had taken out loans to buy new machinery and then were unable to repay them. This was due to the decrease in crop prices and the accumulation of interest on their loans, which created a financial burden on farmers.
The new innovations made farming more productive, but farmers did not have the money to invest in them. Thus, they could not take full advantage of the technological advancements that were made. Furthermore, many farmers were in debt, so they had to keep producing crops at lower prices, which made it difficult to remain profitable.
As a result, many farmers migrated out of rural areas in search of other work opportunities. However, some farmers managed to stay in business due to time-saving mechanization.
To know more about work opportunities refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17936259#
#SPJ11
Describe common factors that led to the three twentieth-century global wars.
The three twentieth-century global wars were
World War I (1914-1918), World War II (1939-1945), and the Cold War (1947-1991). What were the common factors that contributed to the war outbreak and escalationNationalism and Imperialism: Many of the major powers involved in the twentieth-century wars were driven by a desire to expand their influence and territory, often through imperialism and colonization. Nationalistic sentiment also played a significant role, as countries sought to assert their dominance and protect their sovereignty.
Militarism: The build-up of military power and the glorification of war were common features of the early twentieth century, with many nations increasing their military spending and developing new weapons technologies. This created an atmosphere of tension and competition, with each country striving to maintain a military advantage over its rivals.
Alliance Systems: The complex network of alliances that developed between European nations before World War I created a situation where a small-scale conflict between two countries could quickly escalate into a larger, global war. The same was true during World War II, as the Axis and Allied powers formed rival alliances that ultimately resulted in a devastating conflict.
Economic Tensions: Economic pressures and competition for resources also played a role in the lead-up to both World War I and World War II. The Great Depression of the 1930s, in particular, created a sense of economic instability and desperation that fueled the rise of extremist political movements in many countries.
Learn more about global wars at:
https://brainly.com/question/1449119
#SPJ1
which view of the power of the federal government is most consistent with the philosophy of alexander hamilton and his supporters.
Alexander Hamilton's view of the power of the federal government is most consistent with the federalist philosophy.
The federalist philosophy is most consistent with Alexander Hamilton's view of the power of the federal government. This is because he believed that the federal government should be the most powerful, even though the states should retain some degree of independence, and that the US government should have a strong executive branch.
What is Hamiltonian Federalism?
Hamiltonian Federalism refers to a political philosophy based on the principles of Alexander Hamilton, one of America's Founding Fathers. He believed that a powerful federal government was required to protect the nation's independence and sovereignty in the face of internal rebellion and foreign threats.
Hamilton argued that the federal government should be responsible for setting national economic policy, creating and enforcing laws, and overseeing national security.
He believed that a strong central government was essential to safeguarding American liberty, even if it necessitated limiting state authority. Consequently, the Federalist philosophy is the view of the power of the federal government that is most consistent with Alexander Hamilton's philosophy and his supporters.
To know more about Federalist philosophy refer here:https://brainly.com/question/13656367#
#SPJ11
how did the introduction of dairy change early humans to evolved?
Answer: The ability of adults to consume fresh milk occurred rapidly in Europe during the transition to agriculturalist lifestyles, as a byproduct of the adaptation to dairying. The molecular analysis of genetic variants in modern people suggests that the adaptation and evolution of this ability occurred rapidly.
Explanation: All humans can digest milk in infancy. But the ability to do so as an adult developed fairly recently, likely in the past 6000 years. . A genetic mutation appeared, somewhere near modern-day Turkey, that jammed the lactase-production gene permanently in the “on” position.
In summary, early humans evolved to consume dairy products as a byproduct of their adaptation to dairying. The ability of adults to consume fresh milk occurred rapidly in Europe during the transition to agriculturalist lifestyles. All humans can digest milk in infancy but the ability to do so as an adult developed fairly recently. A genetic mutation appeared, somewhere near modern-day Turkey, that jammed the lactase-production gene permanently in the “on” position.
Hope this helps, and have a great day!
what did harriet tubman do after slavery was abolished and the war was over?
Answer:
Harriet Tubman settled in New York, and continued to fight for equality and to provide services to the needy. Tubman worked closely with politicians, thought leaders, and intellectuals of her time – Frederick Douglass, William Henry Seward, Susan B.
how did articles 123, 125, and 126 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union complicate the situation for piigs
The articles 123, 125, and 126 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) complicate the situation for the PIIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain) by introducing stricter fiscal policies.
Article 123 prevents Member States from carrying out any quantitative restrictions on the movement of capital between Member States and from third countries.
Article 125 states that the Member States should not carry out any excessive deficit procedure, which limits the amount of public debt allowed for each Member State. Finally, Article 126 allows for increased surveillance and coordination of Member States’ fiscal policies.
To know more about European Union refer to-
brainly.com/question/1683533#
#SPJ11
How did the supreme court decision in worcester v. georgia affect american indians? a. the ruling gave the state authority over relations with american indians b. more american indian tribes decided to grant licenses to missionaries to live on tribal landsc. the state ignored the ruling and distributed cherokee lands to white settlers d. reservation policies were overturned and replaced with land grants to individuals
The right answer is C.
The effect that the decision of the Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia was that the state ignored the ruling and distributed Cherokee lands to white settlers.
In September 1831, Samuel A. Worcester and others, all non-Native Americans, were accused in the supreme court for the county of Gwinnett in the state of Georgia for "residing within the limits of the Cherokee nation without a license" and "without having taken the oath to support and defend the constitution and laws of the state of Georgia." The Georgia legislature passed a law in 1830 called "an act that forbade the exercise of assumed and arbitrarily determined power by all persons, under guise of permission from the Cherokee Indians," that they were accused with breaching. Worcester claimed, among other things, that the statute's violations of the Constitution and international pacts prevented the state from pursuing the case the Cherokee Nation, the United States, and a law passed by Congress called "an act to regulate trade and relations with the Indian tribes."
Worcester was found guilty and given a four-year prison term of "hard labor." The matter was brought before the US Supreme Court on an error writ.
To know more about Samuel A. Worcester, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1056321
#SPJ4
what issues would the elimination of some countries and the creation of new countries cause
The elimination of some countries and creation of new countries could potentially have significant political, economic, and social impacts, depending on the specific circumstances involved.
What is elimination?Elimination refers to the process of removing or getting rid of something, whether it be a physical object or an abstract concept. In mathematics, elimination is a technique used to solve systems of equations by eliminating one variable at a time until a solution is found. In the context of biology, elimination can refer to the removal of waste or toxins from the body through processes like sweating, urination, and defecation. In sports and competitions, elimination refers to the process of eliminating competitors from a tournament or event through a series of rounds or matches. In business, elimination can refer to the process of cutting costs or reducing expenses in order to improve profitability. Overall, elimination involves the act of removing or reducing something to achieve a desired outcome.
To learn more about competitions, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29521271
#SPJ1
Can someone help me given Brainly
Your best fit is…
(Committed. Conservatives)
…. Along with 7% the public
Committed Conservatives
Staunchly conservative and overwhelmingly Republican, Committed Conservatives hold pro-business views traditionally associated with the Republican Party, have favorable attitudes about international trade and favor limited government. Their approach to international relations centers on engaging with U.S. Allie’s and maintaining American military might. Committed Conservatives tend to hold more moderate positions on immigration than Faith and Family Conservatives and Populist Right. They also are slightly more moderate than these groups on some issues related to racial and ethnic equality. While they largely supported Donald Trump in 2020, they are less likely than Faith and Family Conservatives and Populist Right to favor a major role for Trump in their party’s future.
Does this change your opinion about political views why or why not?
Do you Agree or Disagree of Committed Conservatives why or why not?
Compared to the Populist Right and Faith & Flag Conservatives, two other extremely conservative groups with in Republican coalition.
How well-versed are you in conservatism?Dedicated Conservatives typically have more liberal attitudes towards immigration.
They are also slightly more moderate than all of these groups on some issues relating to racial and ethnic equality, although they are still more conservative than the groups with a Democratic lean. Conservatives backed lasting traditional and cultural values. They were the defenders of the aristocracy and nobility. They believed that there ought to be privileges for the king and the nobility. They argued that after the French Revolution, society should go through gradual reform.
To know more about Conservatives visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28318194
#SPJ1
what did the shang king do for nobles in exchange for their military help?
The Shang king provided nobles with land, titles, and the opportunity to participate in the government in exchange for their military support.
During the Shang dynasty in ancient China, the king relied on the support of his nobles to maintain military power and control over the kingdom. In exchange for their military aid, the king provided the nobles with various rewards and privileges. These included the granting of land, titles, and the opportunity to participate in the government as advisors or administrators. The nobles were also allowed to collect taxes and tribute from the people living on their lands. This arrangement allowed the king to maintain a strong central government while delegating power and responsibilities to his loyal supporters. The system of reciprocity between the king and his nobles was a key aspect of the political and social structure of the Shang dynasty.
learn more about Shang king here:
https://brainly.com/question/31047189
#SPJ4
in what ways did the columbian exchange affect the lives of the inhabitants of both the old and the new worlds?
The Columbian Exchange resulted in the exchange of crops, animals, diseases, culture, and ideas between the Old World and the New World.
Significant impacts of the Columbian Exchange.Exchange of crops and livestock: Crops like corn, potatoes, and tomatoes were introduced to the Old World, while crops like wheat, rice, and sugar were introduced to the New World. Spread of diseases: The Old World diseases such as smallpox, influenza, and measles were introduced to the New World, which had a devastating impact on the native populations who had no immunity to these diseases.Cultural exchange: The introduction of horses to the New World revolutionized transportation and warfare for many indigenous groups, while the introduction of gunpowder from the Old World had a significant impact on the way wars were fought in the New World.Environmental changes: The introduction of new crops and livestock had an impact on the ecosystems of both worlds, while the introduction of new plants like tobacco led to changes in the landscape and the way people used the land.Learn more about Columbian Exchange here:
https://brainly.com/question/14088518
#SPJ11
This was NOT a part of the Treaty of Versailles?
A. Alsace Lorraine returned to France
B. Allied forces occupied the Rhineland
C. Brest-Litovsk Treaty bonored D. Germany stripped of overseas colonies
Answer:
c) Brest-Litovsk Treaty honored
Explanation:
the treaty of Versailles was made to punish German for their role in ww1, and the Brest litovisk treaty was made to withdraw Russia from the war
Galatians 3:7-8 says the following: 7Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham. 8And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “In you shall all the nations be blessed.” In 3-5 good sentences, identify the covenant involved in this text and how Paul interprets it differently than previous Jewish tradition.
Paul presents the concept of a spiritual family as an alternative to a physical family in this passage—a family that shares faith rather than a bloodline.
What does it imply that those who have faith are Abraham's sons?Clearly, Abraham had actual, physical children. It was they, through Isaac and Jacob, who turned into the country of Israel, God's picked individuals. However, many people in Israel did not follow God as they ought to. In the Old Testament, Gentiles like Rahab and Ruth were adopted into the Israel family at the same time. According to Romans 11:17–20, many Gentiles are "grafted" into the tree of Israel by faith in Jesus, the Messiah of Israel. “Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham,” Paul writes to Gentiles in Galatians 3:7 (ESV).
To learn more about Messiah visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30720420
#SPJ1
what caused the negative response to impressionism by contemporary audiences in the nineteenth century?
What revolutions are taking place in the world today? What are the major issues ? Who is involved ? What are the actions and outcomes ?
The significant advances in the human condition have resulted from the creation and development of modern science since the seventeenth century.
In the late eighteenth century, the Industrial Revolution got underway. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the Demographic Revolution got underway. The third began in the late 20th century and is known as the Happy Revolution. Economic growth, regime type, and state inefficiency are the three main factors that influence when a revolution begins.
People's desire for political change is fueled by economic growth, while some groups experience economic unhappiness as a result. Democratic governments appear to have a greater impact on political stability than autocratic ones due to their pragmatic and inclusive political philosophies. Besides from regime, other factors include state efficacy or lack thereof modern science's development from its inception has an impact on whether political violence occurs or not. States that are repressive or unresponsive will probably encourage violence. Finally, whereas external causes like price increases and war victories seem to encourage revolution, their primary function is typically that of triggering effects.
To know more about Demographic Revolution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29979659
#SPJ4
How did the Treaty of Versailles lead to World War 2?
- Make an introduction paragraph
- body paragraph
Read checklist below
Answer: Economic distress and seething resentment of the treaty within germany helped fuel the rise of adolf hitler and his nazi party, as well as world war ll
how did the 16th and 17th amendments represent a shift in thinking about economic and political equality?
The 16th and 17th amendments symbolized a change in thinking about economic and political equality since they addressed problems that were critical to the U.S. public.
The 16th Amendment granted Congress the authority to levy an income tax, whereas the 17th Amendment provided for the direct election of U.S. senators by the people.
Both of these measures aimed to address major issues of the day, namely the distribution of wealth and the need for more democratic governance. The 16th Amendment was an answer to the issue of wealth distribution, which had been increasing dramatically in the U.S. at the time.
The tax would have an impact on the country's richest people, who would be required to contribute a more substantial portion of their income to the federal government.
The amendment thus addressed the economic gap in America by redistributing wealth, making a significant difference in the standard of living of millions of people, as well as the quality of life of the country as a whole.
The 17th Amendment, on the other hand, was a reaction to issues of political equality. Before the amendment, state legislatures chose U.S. senators, which gave them an unfair amount of control over their state's representatives.
To learn more about 16th and 17th amendments here:
https://brainly.com/question/29932875#
#SPJ11