What is the rule to find the missing term ? ( IMAGE HAS TABLE )
CHOICES
A. 2/n
B. n + 2
C. 2n
D. n - 2
~ PLEASE HELP ~
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

Answer:

In believe it’s 68 but I might be wrong so if it is sorry

Step-by-step explanation:

vitive is D: −nnn−4.

To answer the question, the expression with the least vitive is D: −nnn−4.

For reference, the expressions in the question are:
4. c3v9c−1c0
6. 9y4j2y−9
8. 2y−9h2(2y0h−4)−6
10. (−3q−1)3q2

Learn more about expression

brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ11

True. All real numbers satisfy the equation -4(6y+4)+19=12(-2y+5)-55.

The statement "If the equation is true for all real numbers enter 'All'" has been used to indicate that the given equation is true for all real numbers.

Given equation: -4(6y + 4) + 19 = 12(-2y + 5) - 55

Using distributive property, simplify both sides of the equation.

-24y - 16 + 19 = -24y + 60 - 55-24y + 3 = -24y + 5

By transposing -24y from the right-hand side of the equation to the left-hand side of the equation, we can simplify it as follows:

3 = 5

Since the above equation is always false for all real numbers, there is no solution. Therefore, we conclude that the given equation has no solution.

Learn more about real numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/19593471#

#SPJ11

[tex]\textit{equation of a circle}\\\\ (x- h)^2+(y- k)^2= r^2 \hspace{5em}\stackrel{center}{(\underset{-3}{h}~~,~~\underset{6}{k})}\qquad \stackrel{radius}{\underset{5}{r}} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ ( ~~ x - (-3) ~~ )^2 ~~ + ~~ ( ~~ y-6 ~~ )^2~~ = ~~5^2\implies (x+3)^2+(y-6)=25[/tex]

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of fraction comes out to be -3 5/8 as a result.

Any combination of equal portions or fractions can be combined to represent a whole. In standard English, the quantity of a certain size is defined as a fraction. 8, 3/4. Wholes also include fractions. The ratio of numerator to ratio is a mathematical symbol for integers. All of these number fractions are simple fractions. There is a fraction inside of the fraction but rather remainder in a difficult fraction.

Here,

=> 9 1/4 = (4 x 9 + 1)/4 = 37/4

=> 12 7/8 = (8 x 12 + 7)/8 = 103/8

4 and 8 have the same shared factor, which is 8.

=> 37/4 - 103/8 = (2 x 37)/(2 x 4) (2 x 4) - 103/8

=> 74/8 - 103/8

=> -29/8

There is no simpler way to describe the outcome.

Since the outcome is already an incorrect fraction, we can change it back to a mixed integer as follows:

-29/8 = -3 5/8

9 1/4 - 12 7/8 Equals -3 5/8 as a result.

To know more about fraction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1

The equation correctly represents the amount of money in her savings account in terms of the monthly growth rate is [tex]y = 2000(1 + 0.0033)^t[/tex]. Option D is the correct answer.

The interest earned on savings that is computed using both the original principle and the interest accrued over time is known as compound interest. It is said that Italy in the 17th century is where the concept of "interest on interest" or compound interest first appeared. It will accelerate the growth of a total more quickly than simple interest, which is solely computed on the principal sum.

Money multiplies more quickly thanks to compounding, and the more compounding periods there are, the higher the compound interest will be.

Given that, the function of the model of the account is:

[tex]y = 2000(1.04)^t[/tex]

The monthly interest rate is:

r = 4% / 12 = 0.00333

The model in terms of monthly interest rate can be written as:

[tex]y = 2000(1 + r)^{12t/12}[/tex]

Substituting the value of r:

[tex]y = 2000(1 + 0.0033)^t[/tex]

Hence, the equation correctly represents the amount of money in her savings account in terms of the monthly growth rate is [tex]y = 2000(1 + 0.0033)^t[/tex].

Learn more about compound interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/29335425

#SPJ1

The scale factor used to produce Figure 2 from Figure 1 is given as follows:

7/3.

A dilation happens when the coordinates of the vertices of an image are multiplied by the scale factor, changing the side lengths of a figure.

The side lengths are given as follows:

Hence the scale factor of the dilation is given as follows:

7/3.

(the scale factor is the division of the side length of the dilated figure by the equivalent side length of the original figure).

The problem asks for the scale factor used from figure 1 to figure 2.

More can be learned about dilation at brainly.com/question/3457976

#SPJ1

Answer:

C 7/3 because i got it right

The exact value of sec(sin-1(3/10)) is 1.049988251.

The exact value of sec(sin-1(3/10)) can be found using the following steps:

Step 1: Enter the value of sin-1(3/10) into a calculator to get the angle measure in radians. This will give you an angle measure of 0.304692654.

Step 2: Take the cosine of this angle measure using a calculator. This will give you a value of 0.952424403.

Step 3: The value of secant is the reciprocal of the value of cosine. So, to find the exact value of sec(sin-1(3/10)), take the reciprocal of 0.952424403. This will give you an exact value of 1.049988251.

Step 4: Simplify any radicals if necessary. In this case, there are no radicals to simplify.

Therefore, the exact value of sec(sin-1(3/10)) is 1.049988251.

Learn more about radicals

brainly.com/question/1369233

#SPJ11

The equation log_x y = 4  can be written as y = x⁴ and the true, correct option is 1.

A base must be raised to a certain exponent or power, or logarithm, in order to produce a specific number. that is, b raised to x = n, in which case one writes x = log base b n. Scientists embraced logarithms immediately because of a number of advantageous characteristics that made complicated, time-consuming computations simpler. In specifically, by searching up each number's logarithm in a special database, adding the logarithms together, and then rechecking the table to discover the number with that computed logarithm, scientists could find the product of two integers m and n.

Given that, log_x y = 4 .

Using the logarithmic rule we have:

log_x y = 4  

y = x⁴

Hence, the equation log_x y = 4  can be written as y = x⁴ and the correct option is 1.

Learn more about logarithm here:

https://brainly.com/question/27389970

#SPJ1

Answer:

$512.17

$286.48

$1,958.40

$1,628.85

$56.37

$324.24

$135.55

Note: These calculations were made assuming simple interest. If the interest is compounded, the final amounts will be slightly different.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

big semicircle circumference=1/2*3.14*64

100.48cm

small semicircle circumference=1/2*3.14*16=25.12cm

total perimeter=125.6cm

Therefore, the formula that expresses the described relationship where A varies inversely as h is A = k/h.

The formula that expresses the described relationship where A varies inversely as h is A = k/h, where k is the constant of proportionality.

In an inverse relationship, one variable increases as the other variable decreases. In this case, as h increases, A decreases, and as h decreases, A increases. The constant of proportionality, k, remains the same throughout the relationship.

To find the value of k, you can use the formula and plug in known values for A and h. For example, if A = 4 and h = 2, you can plug these values into the formula and solve for k:

4 = k/2

k = 8

Once you know the value of k, you can use the formula to find the value of A or h, given the value of the other variable. For example, if you know that h = 3 and k = 8, you can plug these values into the formula and solve for A:

A = 8/3

A = 2.67

Therefore, the formula that expresses the described relationship where A varies inversely as h is A = k/h.

Learn more about relationship

brainly.com/question/23752761

#SPJ11

Answer:

The original cost for 1 pound of coffee is $4.50, and Gabriel wants to buy 4 pounds, so the total cost without the coupon would be:

4 pounds x $4.50/pound = $18

With the coupon, Gabriel can subtract $2 from the final amount, so the total cost with the coupon would be:

$18 - $2 = $16

Therefore, Gabriel would have to pay $16 to buy 4 pounds of coffee with the coupon.

To write an expression for the cost to buy p pounds of coffee, we can use the formula:

cost = price per pound x number of pounds - coupon

If Gabriel buys at least one pound of coffee, then the expression would be:

cost = $4.50p - $2

So the cost to buy p pounds of coffee can be calculated by plugging in the desired value for p into this expression.

The solution to this system of equations is: \[ \begin{array}{l} x=40 \\ y=-111 \\ z=-3.5 \end{array} \]

To solve this system of equations using Cramer's Rule, we will begin by finding the determinant of the coefficient matrix, which is an array of the coefficients of the variables in the equations. We will then find the determinants of the matrices that result from replacing each column of the coefficient matrix with the constant terms of the equations. Finally, we will use these determinants to find the values of x, y, and z.

The coefficient matrix is: \[ \begin{array}{ccc} -3 & -4 & -4 \\ 1 & -3 & -3 \\ -1 & 1 & -2 \end{array} \]

The determinant of the coefficient matrix is: \[ \begin{array}{ccc} -3 & -4 & -4 \\ 1 & -3 & -3 \\ -1 & 1 & -2 \end{array} = (-3)(-3)(-2) - (-4)(-3)(-1) - (-4)(1)(1) - (-4)(-3)(-1) - (-4)(-3)(1) - (-4)(1)(-2) = -6 + 4 + 4 + 4 - 12 + 8 = -2 \]

The matrix that results from replacing the first column of the coefficient matrix with the constant terms is: \[ \begin{array}{ccc} -8 & -4 & -4 \\ -19 & -3 & -3 \\ 3 & 1 & -2 \end{array} \]

The determinant of this matrix is: \[ \begin{array}{ccc} -8 & -4 & -4 \\ -19 & -3 & -3 \\ 3 & 1 & -2 \end{array} = (-8)(-3)(-2) - (-4)(-3)(3) - (-4)(-19)(1) - (-4)(-3)(3) - (-4)(-19)(1) - (-4)(-3)(-2) = 48 - 36 - 76 + 36 - 76 + 24 = -80 \]

The matrix that results from replacing the second column of the coefficient matrix with the constant terms is: \[ \begin{array}{ccc} -3 & -8 & -4 \\ 1 & -19 & -3 \\ -1 & 3 & -2 \end{array} \]

The determinant of this matrix is: \[ \begin{array}{ccc} -3 & -8 & -4 \\ 1 & -19 & -3 \\ -1 & 3 & -2 \end{array} = (-3)(-19)(-2) - (-8)(-3)(-1) - (-4)(1)(3) - (-4)(-19)(-1) - (-4)(-3)(1) - (-4)(1)(-2) = 114 + 24 + 12 + 76 - 12 + 8 = 222 \]

The matrix that results from replacing the third column of the coefficient matrix with the constant terms is: \[ \begin{array}{ccc} -3 & -4 & -8 \\ 1 & -3 & -19 \\ -1 & 1 & 3 \end{array} \]

The determinant of this matrix is: \[ \begin{array}{ccc} -3 & -4 & -8 \\ 1 & -3 & -19 \\ -1 & 1 & 3 \end{array} = (-3)(-3)(3) - (-4)(-19)(-1) - (-8)(1)(1) - (-8)(-3)(-1) - (-8)(-19)(1) - (-8)(1)(3) = 27 + 76 + 8 + 24 - 152 + 24 = 7 \]

Using these determinants, we can find the values of x, y, and z: \[ x = \frac{-80}{-2} = 40 \] \[ y = \frac{222}{-2} = -111 \] \[ z = \frac{7}{-2} = -3.5 \]

Therefore, the solution to this system of equations is: \[ \begin{array}{l} x=40 \\ y=-111 \\ z=-3.5 \end{array} \]

Learn more about Variables

brainly.com/question/17344045

#SPJ11

Therefore, there would be 1024 players remaining in the tournament at the end of 3 rounds.

The function f(x) = 8192(0.05)^x represents exponential decay, where the number of players is decreasing by a factor of 0.05 in each round. However, in this tournament, the number of players is decreasing by a factor of 0.5 (half the players) in each round. Therefore, the correct function should be f(x) = 8192(0.5)^x.

To find the number of players remaining in the tournament at the end of x rounds, simply plug in the value of x into the function and solve.

For example, if we want to find the number of players remaining at the end of 3 rounds, we would plug in x = 3 and solve:

f(3) = 8192(0.5)^3
f(3) = 8192(0.125)
f(3) = 1024

Therefore, there would be 1024 players remaining in the tournament at the end of 3 rounds. Similarly, you can plug in any value of x to find the number of players remaining at the end of x rounds.

To know more about tournaments, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/18756870#

#SPJ11

Answer:

i dont think its possible

Bank B may be a better option because the 10 percent increase is applied to the new balance each year, whereas Bank A only adds a flat 6 dollars each year.

If you put your money into Bank A, you will have to equate it as 60 + 6 = <<60+6=66>>66 dollars after one year.

If you put your money into Bank B, you will have 60 + (60 * 0.10) = 60 + 6 = <<60+(60*0.10)=66>>66 dollars after one year of the investment.

So, after one year, you will have the same amount of money in both Bank A and Bank B.

To know more about investment click on below link:

brainly.com/question/15105766#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The inequality that shows the range from -9 to 9, but only including the range from -4 to 3, can be written as:

-4 ≤ x ≤ 3

This inequality means that x can take on any value between -4 and 3, including -4 and 3 themselves, but it cannot be less than -4 or greater than 3. The inequality does not include the values between -9 and -4, or between 3 and 9.

Step-by-step explanation:

explanation of how to arrive at the inequality -4 ≤ x ≤ 3 to represent the range from -9 to 9, but only including the range from -4 to 3:

Start with the range from -9 to 9:

-9 ≤ x ≤ 9

Identify the portion of the range that we want to include:

-4 ≤ x ≤ 3

Replace the original range with the desired range:

-4 ≤ x ≤ 3 replaces -9 ≤ x ≤ 9

Check that the inequality is inclusive of the desired range but not of any values outside of that range:

-4 is included in the range -4 ≤ x ≤ 3, but is not included in the original range -9 ≤ x ≤ 9. Similarly, 3 is included in the range -4 ≤ x ≤ 3, but is not included in the original range -9 ≤ x ≤ 9. Any values less than -4 or greater than 3 are excluded from the range -4 ≤ x ≤ 3, as desired.

Therefore, the inequality -4 ≤ x ≤ 3 represents the range from -9 to 9, but only including the range from -4 to 3.

The inequality -4 ≤ x ≤ 3 represents the range from -9 to 9, but only including the range from -4 to 3.

The inequality that shows the range from -9 to 9, but only including the range from -4 to 3, can be written as:

-4 ≤ x ≤ 3

This inequality means that x can take on any value between -4 and 3, including -4 and 3 themselves, but it cannot be less than -4 or greater than 3. The inequality does not include the values between -9 and -4, or between 3 and 9.

explanation of how to arrive at the inequality -4 ≤ x ≤ 3 to represent the range from -9 to 9, but only including the range from -4 to 3:

Start with the range from -9 to 9:

-9 ≤ x ≤ 9

Identify the portion of the range that we want to include:

-4 ≤ x ≤ 3

Replace the original range with the desired range:

-4 ≤ x ≤ 3 replaces -9 ≤ x ≤ 9

Check that the inequality is inclusive of the desired range but not of any values outside of that range:

-4 is included in the range -4 ≤ x ≤ 3, but is not included in the original range -9 ≤ x ≤ 9. Similarly, 3 is included in the range -4 ≤ x ≤ 3, but is not included in the original range -9 ≤ x ≤ 9. Any values less than -4 or greater than 3 are excluded from the range -4 ≤ x ≤ 3, as desired.

Therefore, the inequality -4 ≤ x ≤ 3 represents the range from -9 to 9, but only including the range from -4 to 3.

Learn more about inequality

https://brainly.com/question/30228778

#SPJ1

Answer:

187

Step-by-step explanation:

how to do long division, you know how to start im assuming. then you then bring down and Divide, Multiply, Subtract, with the first number then bring the next number down and repeat that.

Answer:

187

Step-by-step explanation:

I personally just do multiplication whenever I can, but that's just me. Like for example I know 100 x 3 = 300 and 200 x 3 = 600. SO it has to be between 100 and 200.

150 x 3 = 450. So know it narrows it down to between 150 and 200.

175 x 3 = 525

180 x 3 = 540

185 x 3 = 555

190 x 3 =570

So now it's between 185 and 190.

Now I just need to do the following.

186 x 3 = 558

187 x 3 = 561

And there we have the answer.

Based on the information, we can infer that the second plan is the best for the bicycle company because it will cost less and will earn more.

To identify the best alternative for the bicycle company, we must take into account the information on the cost of design and construction of the bicycles and the cost of labor and production.

In accordance with the above, we can infer that in alternative one the design and construction of the bicycle would be more expensive than alternative two. However, the production of each bicycle would be less.

Therefore, the best alternative would be option two because it requires less initial research and the product will cost more, so it would have a higher retail value, so the investment could be recovered much faster. .

Learn more about financial analysis in: https://brainly.com/question/14234253

#SPJ1

The surface area of the rectangular prism is 174 cm^2

Rectangular Prism is a three-dimensional shape, having six faces, where all the faces (top, bottom, and lateral faces) of the prism are rectangle such that all the pairs of the opposite faces are congruent.

To determine the surface area of Rectangular prism

SA = 2(LH + LW + WH)

Where W = Width = 2 cm

L = Length = 5 cm

H = Height = 11 cm

SA = 2[(5*11) + (5*2) + (11*2)]

SA = 2(55 + 10 + 22)

SA = 2(87)

SA = 2 * 87

SA = 174

Therefore, the surface area of rectangular prism is 174 cm^2

Read more about Rectangular Prism

https://brainly.com/question/30526760

#SPJ1

The original bill of the man can be calculated using the formula for discount, which is:

Discount = Original Price × Discount Rate

Given that the discount is Php 160 and the discount rate is 2%, we can rearrange the formula to solve for the original price:

Original Price = Discount ÷ Discount Rate

Original Price = Php 160 ÷ 2%

Original Price = Php 160 ÷ 0.02

Original Price = Php 8,000

Therefore, the original bill of the man was Php 8,000 before the 2% discount was applied.

To know more about discount click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3541148

#SPJ11

Answer: 8

Step-by-step explanation: (9-7)^3= 8

Answer: ? = 8

Step-by-step explanation: 2 x 2 x 2 = 8

If the number when rounded to 2 decimal places  is equal to 9.68, then the upper bound is 9.685 and lower bound is 9.675 .

In order to find the upper bound of the number y, we need to add 0.005,

and to find the lower bound of the number y, we need to subtract 0.005 ,

We know that, the number y, when rounded to 2 decimal places is equal to 9.68 ;

So, the Upper Bound is = 9.68 + 0.005 = 9.685, and

The Lower Bound is = 9.68 - 0.005 = 9.675.

Therefore, the lower bound of y is 9.675 and upper bound of y is 9.685.

Learn more about Bounds here

https://brainly.com/question/20488308

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Decreasing.

This is because the as you increase the X value and solve for Y, the Y value decreases.

For example:

[tex]x=1 \\y=2(\frac{1}{3} )^1\\y=\frac{2}{3} =0.667\\\\x=2\\y=2(\frac{1}{3} )^1\\y=\frac{2}{9}=0.222\\\\x=3\\y=2(\frac{1}{3} )^3\\y=\frac{2}{27}=0.074[/tex]

The numeric value of the composite function at x = 4 is given as follows:

|f(4) - 1|.

The composite function of f(x) and g(x) is given by the following rule:

(f ∘ g)(x) = f(g(x)).

It means that the output of the inside function serves as the input for the outside function.

If g is the outer function, as is the case for this problem, we have that:

(g • f)(x) = g(f(x)).

At x = 4, the numeric value of the composite function is given as follows:

g(f(4)) = |f(4) - 1|.

The problem is incomplete, hence the composite function is given in general terms.

More can be learned about functions at https://brainly.com/question/24808124

#SPJ1

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Fractions have two parts, the numerator and the denominator. The denominator is the bottom number and it tells us what unit of fraction we are working with (ie: it denotes fourths, halves, etc.)

Hope it helps! :D

No, (8, 2) is not a solution to the inequality y ≥ 3x + 4 because when we substitute x = 8 and y = 2 into the inequality, we get a false statement. In other words, the point (8, 2) does not satisfy the inequality y ≥ 3x + 4, which means it is not a valid solution to the inequality.

To determine whether (8, 2) is a solution to the inequality y ≥ 3x + 4, we need to substitute the values of x and y into the inequality and check if the inequality holds true.

y ≥ 3x + 4

Substituting x = 8 and y = 2:

2 ≥ 3(8) + 4

2 ≥ 24 + 4

2 ≥ 28

The inequality is not true since 2 is not greater than or equal to 28.

To learn more about solution follow the link: brainly.com/question/1416865

#SPJ4

¬ Vx(Fx → Gx) v 3xFx ⊢ Fx → Gx [1-5, Modus Ponens]

i. ∃x(Fx & Gx) ⊢ ∃xFx & ∃xGx (5 marks)

Proof:

1. ∃x(Fx & Gx) [Premise]

2. Fx & Gx [∃-Elimination, 1]

3. ∃xFx [∃-Introduction, 2]

4. ∃xGx [∃-Introduction, 2]

5. ∃xFx & ∃xGx [Conjunction Introduction, 3 and 4]

6. ∃x(Fx & Gx) ⊢ ∃xFx & ∃xGx [1-5, Modus Ponens]

ii. ¬ 3x(Px v Qx) ⊢ Vx ¬ Px (5 marks)

Proof:

1. ¬ 3x(Px v Qx) [Premise]

2. ¬ Px v ¬ Qx [DeMorgan’s Law, 1]

3. Vx ¬ Px [∀-Introduction, 2]

4. ¬ 3x(Px v Qx) ⊢ Vx ¬ Px [1-3, Modus Ponens]

iii. ¬ Vx(Fx → Gx) v 3xFx (10 marks; Hint: To derive this theorem use RA.)

Proof:

1. ¬ Vx(Fx → Gx) v 3xFx [Premise]

2. (¬ Vx(Fx → Gx) v 3xFx) → (¬ Vx(Fx → Gx) v Fx) [Implication Introduction]

3. ¬ Vx(Fx → Gx) v Fx [Resolution, 1, 2]

4. (¬ Vx(Fx → Gx) v Fx) → (Fx → Gx) [Implication Introduction]

5. Fx → Gx [Resolution, 3, 4]

6. ¬ Vx(Fx → Gx) v 3xFx ⊢ Fx → Gx [1-5, Modus Ponens]

  Learn more about Derivations

  brainly.com/question/30365299

  #SPJ11

The probability that the proportion of sampled residents who are making an effort to conserve water or electricity is greater than 80% is 0.0107.

To find the probability that the proportion of sampled residents who are making an effort to conserve water or electricity is greater than 80%, use the formula for the standard error of a proportion:

SE = √(p(1-p)/n)

Where p is the proportion of the population that is making an effort to conserve water or electricity, and n is the sample size.

In this case, p = 0.72 and n = 110. Plugging these values into the formula gives:

SE = √(0.72(1-0.72)/110) = 0.0347

Next, we need to find the z-score for the proportion of 0.80. The z-score is given by:

z = (P - p)/SE

Where P is the sample proportion and p is the population proportion. In this case, P = 0.80 and p = 0.72. Plugging these values into the formula gives:

z = (0.80 - 0.72)/0.0347 = 2.30

Finally, we can use the z-score to find the probability that the proportion of sampled residents who are making an effort to conserve water or electricity is greater than 80%. This is given by:

P(z > 2.30) = 1 - P(z < 2.30) = 1 - 0.9893 = 0.0107

Therefore, the probability is 0.0107 or 1.07%.

Learn more about probability here: https://brainly.com/question/24756209.

#SPJ11