What is the purpose of government? Select a quotation from a US leader on the subject of government. Then, write an argumentative essay that explains why you agree or disagree with the leader’s views. In the conclusion to your essay, present your own views on the purpose of government based on the statement you evaluated and discussed.

Answer:

The Chola dynasty was a Tamil thalassocratic empire of southern India, one of the longest-ruling dynasties in the world's history. The earliest datable references to the Chola are in inscriptions from the 3rd century BCE left by Ashoka, of the Maurya Empire (Ashoka Major Rock Edict No.13). As one of the Three Crowned Kings of Tamilakam, along with the Chera and Pandya, the dynasty continued to govern over varying territory until the 13th century CE. Despite these ancient origins, the period when it is appropriate to speak of a "Chola Empire" only begins with the medieval Cholas in the mid-9th century CE.

The Cholas left a lasting legacy. Their patronage of Tamil literature and their zeal in building temples has resulted in some great works of Tamil literature and architecture. Chola kings were avid builders and envisioned the temples in their kingdoms as places of worship but also as centers of economic activity. were also well known for their art, specifically temple sculptures and 'Chola bronzes', exquisite bronze sculptures of Hindu deities built in a lost-wax process they pioneered; that continues (to a certain extent) to this day. They established a centralized form of government and a disciplined bureaucracy. The Chola school of art spread to Southeast Asia and influenced the architecture and art of Southeast Asia.[13][14] The medieval Cholas are best known for the construction of the magnificent Brihadisvara temple at Thanjavur, commissioned by the most famous Chola king, Rajaraja Chola in 1010 CE.

i hope this is right!

Explanation:

I'd say that it's true

Answer: true, The flight or fight response is our body's physiological response to perceived

Answer:

1) Along with the invasion of the Gorkha he wanted to protect it from the Gorkha troops, so he started to unify the small kingdoms into a single country.

2) One year after becoming King, in 1744 CE, he attacked Nuwakot, but was repelled because the Gorkha army was not well equipped

3) lack of geographical knowledge and trained soldiers.

4) After the defeat with Nuwakot Gorkhali got the following lessons. there should be co-ordinations between the commanders of battalians.

Explanation:

Answer:

smart people, unfortunately, the government does not agree with that

Explanation:

Answer:

globalization-

Explanation:

it is the word used to describe the growing independence of the world 'sat economics, culture, and populations, brought about by cross border trade in goods and services, technology,and flows of investment,people, and information

advantage-

1 transfer of technology

2 better services

3 standardization of living

disadvantage-

1 unequal economic growth

2 lack of local business

3 causes job displacement

hope it helps☺

Answer:

47

Explanation:

Answer: Cooperative federalism occurs when the state governments need help in situations like disaster then federal government controls the state's jurisdiction. When disasters strike the first government to respond is the state government, they have the authority to respond to the disaster that happens in their jurisdiction but when the state can't control the situation then the federal government cooperate with the state government and do actions that needed by the that situation in order to solve the problem.

The relationships between FEMA and GOHSEP is that Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provide assistance in the situation of disaster to the Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (GOHSEP) by funding a financial services contractor.

Explanation: plz mark me brainliest!?! plz!

Intellectual property right (IP) gives a person the right to sole ownership or exclusiveness to their own innovation or any innovation they want to protect over a period of time.

Learn more about IP right at https://brainly.com/question/1078532

Answer: Yes, because he wrote about his event

Answer:

Ionic Compound

Explanation:

Baking soda is composed of sodium ions, Na+ and bicarbonate ions HCO−3

Answer:

Baking Soda is an ionic compound

[tex]▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ { \huge \mathfrak{Answer}}▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ [/tex]

The Correct choice is :

The continental crust is the coolest region.

Answer:

Where's The following? I need more context.

Answer:

Oranges, these are the main source for vitamin c

Answer:

oranges

Explanation:

the answer is oranges because they have vitamin c. the most vitamin c

Answer:

Alexander Hamilton Stephens,

Answer:

Which judicial principle does the passage from the the Marbury v Madison Supreme Court ruling illustrates?

The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.

Explanation:

Which judicial principle does the passage from the the Marbury v Madison Supreme Court ruling illustrates?

The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

A US law cannot be enforced if it conflicts with the constitution.

Answer:

Hiiiiiii!!! :)))

Explanation:

How are you?

Answer:

hiiiiii  hru wyd

Explanation:

Since climate is basically an average of the weather over a long period of time, vegetation is important to climate. ... Plants also help keep our climate stable over time by offsetting temperature and moisture fluctuations through transpiration.

Answer:

Explanation:

C

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

C,D

Explanation:

Answer: Rule of law or Separation of powers

Explanation:

Answer:

I guest the answer on my quiz and it was correct and please let me get the brainlyest.

Explanation:

Answer:

It's a ramp

Explanation:

I got it right on my quiz

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

B.) Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

Explanation:

The correct explanation of (A) is:

Igneous rocks are known as primary rocks because they were the first ones to be formed in the rock cycle and do not contain any organic remains. 

Answer:

Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish-American industrialist and philanthropist. Carnegie led the expansion of the American steel industry in the late 19th century and became one of the richest Americans in history. He became a leading philanthropist in the United States and in the British Empire.

Explanation:

Answer:

he was a Scottish-American industrialist who led the expensive of the steel industry also the richest man in America

Answer:

The lifetime term provides job security, and allows appointed judges to do what is right under the law, because they don't have to fear that they will be fired if they make an unpopular decision.

Explanation:

Answer:

a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.

While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.

b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.

 In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.

In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.

Answer: A.) Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings. Its goal is to impose significantly more constitutional limitations on the states than existed prior to the Civil War. Therefore, the Supreme Court ruled in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), that racial redistricting must be subject to strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause and that the bodies responsible for redistricting must be aware of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While the Supreme Court found that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in defining the 1997 borders was based on patently false conclusions in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001).

B.) Easley filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, challenging the ruling in Hunt v. Cromartie. In the case of Hunt v. Cromartie, the court determined that the North Carolina legislature did not consider race when establishing the borders of the twelfth congressional district in 1992. The court ruled that there was no proof that the legislature had violated the equal protection article of the constitution or that it had drawn boundaries based on race rather than politics. In Easley v Cromartie the argument was that establishing the borders for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The United States Supreme Court ruled that the lower court's ruling was incorrect because it genuinely relied on racial issues, which is against the interests of the state. In Shaw v. Reno, the court found that North Carolina's voting strategy attempted to separate voters based on race.

c.) I think that a move that members of this court would disagree with the BLM (Black lives Matter) movement. This case, Easley v Cromartie has severe relations to the equal protection clause. This clause states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause when then debunked when later furthering the case, which is almost exactly what the BLM movement was about. Both cases disagreed with the equality of particular groups of people. 

Explanation: just submitted

Answer:

CHINA

Explanation: