Answer:
Spiritualism is "a system of belief or religious practice based on supposed communication with the spirits of the dead, especially through mediums," according to the Oxford Languages.
Another way to word this is,
Spiritualism is a way of thinking or acting that is created on the idea that the dead are able to be reached, especially through mediums.
I hope this helped you !!
Why did citizens support the regime of adolf hitler
Answer:
Citizens supported the regime of Adolf Hitler due to his charismatic leadership, promises of economic stability and employment opportunities, and his nationalist rhetoric that appealed to their sense of pride in Germany. Additionally, the use of propaganda and censorship helped to control the information citizens received, making it difficult for them to question or challenge the regime.
Explanation:
How were Texas women divided in their fight for reform
Answer:
As an independent republic and as a state in the United States, Texas granted women no voting rights. Men and women were partners in hardship and work but not in politics and government. Many people, including many women, thought that the status quo should not be disturbed. Custom and tradition held that government was the prerogative of men and hence outside of women's sphere. In the minds of many Texans, woman suffrage was more than a political issue and deemed a dangerous threat to the social order. In contrast, supporters of woman suffrage pointed out that women were citizens and taxpayers and, as such, should be entitled to a voice in the affairs of government. The formidable task of changing public opinion took decades over multiple generations.
Percentage of total government revenue from oil, 1967-1990 a 2-column table with 7 rows titled percentage of total government revenue from oil, 1967 to 1990. column 1 is labeled year with entries 1967, 1971, 1975, 1979, 1983, 1987, 1990. column 2 is labeled percentage with entries 18.26, 25.99, 80.81, 66.30, 67, 75.80, 97.24. based on the chart, what would most likely happen if the demand for oil decreased after 1990? the government would go bankrupt. government revenue would decline. the government would seek foreign loans. government revenue would double.
Based on the chart provided, it is clear that the government's revenue heavily relied on oil from 1967 to 1990. In fact, in 1990, 97.24% of the government's revenue came from oil.
Therefore, if the demand for oil decreased after 1990, it is most likely that the government's revenue would decline significantly. This would lead to a decrease in government spending on various programs and services, which could have negative impacts on the country's economy and the standard of living of its citizens.
The government may have to seek alternative sources of revenue, such as taxes or foreign loans, in order to maintain its operations and avoid bankruptcy. It is also possible that the government may need to diversify its economy and reduce its dependence on oil as a source of revenue.
To know more about revenue, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/8645356#
#SPJ11
1. Another problem with our first plan of government was?
a. There was not enough qualified people to do the work that a government needed to do.
b. It was unable to convince people to buy made in America instead of made in China goods.
c. Congress was unable to settle disagreements between states
Answer:
c. Congress was unable to settle disagreements between states.
Explanation:
This refers to the weakness of the Articles of Confederation, the first plan of government for the United States, which lacked a strong central government and gave too much power to individual states, leading to disputes and difficulty in resolving them.
How did Alexander the Great maintain his power after conquering new lands ?
Answer:
Alexander built many new cities in the lands he conquered, including Alexandria in Egypt.Alexander claimed the Macedonian throne and killed his rivals before they could challenge his sovereignty. He also quashed rebellions for independence in northern Greece.His campaign of conquests from Greece spanned across Anatolia, Syria, Phoenicia, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Persia, Afghanistan, and India. He extended the boundaries of his Macedonian Empire as far east as the city of Taxila in modern-day Pakistan.Following his conquest of Asia Minor, Alexander broke the power of Achaemenid Persia in a series of decisive battles, including those at Issus and Gaugamela; he subsequently overthrew Darius III and conquered the Achaemenid Empire in its entirety.Thanks to his father, Alexander's army was largely a professional one. In earlier times, Macedonians would stop fighting during the harvest, but Philip and Alexander paid the men enough that they could afford to be soldiers full-time. This meant they were often better trained than their adversaries.
Answer:
Alexander the Great maintained his power after conquering new lands through a variety of methods:
Strategic alliances: Alexander formed strategic alliances with local rulers and elites in the lands he conquered. He allowed these individuals to retain some power and authority in exchange for their support and loyalty.
Cultural assimilation: Alexander encouraged cultural assimilation in the lands he conquered. He adopted local customs and practices and allowed his soldiers to marry and have families with local women. This created a sense of unity and shared identity among the diverse populations under his rule.
Military presence: Alexander maintained a strong military presence in the lands he conquered to maintain order and prevent rebellion. He also appointed trusted generals to govern these territories to firmly establish his authority.
Propaganda: Alexander used propaganda to maintain his image as a powerful and invincible ruler. He cultivated a larger-than-life persona through public displays of strength and bravery. He exaggerated and embellished his military victories in accounts written by his supporters.
Explanation:
Use the drop-down menu to complete the sentences.
During his political campaign, Hitler blamed Jewish people for
.
In 1925, Hitler outlined his anti-Semitic ideology in
.
Anti-Semitism can be described as the hatred toward
.
include supportive evidenceeee.
Which of the following traits matches nancy wakes accomplishments/actions:
(these are just examples btw)
a. skillfully tackles problems or challenges
b. -good or moral (strong beliefs or principles)
-stands up to or defeats figurative monsters (i.e. dictator, sexism, racism, etc.)
c. was/is devoted more to his or her cause than personal relationships
d. willing to sacrifice time and energy to achieve their goal
e. -clever, creative, wise, focused
-was/is a visionary (has far reaching ideas)
f. had/has integrity (stands up for what they believe and acts accordingly)
Based on a historical perspective and the available option, the trait that matches Nancy Wake's accomplishment includes options A, B, C, D, E, and F.
Who is Nancy Wake?Nancy Wake, whose full name is Nancy Grace Augusta Wake. She was famous for being named Madame Fiocca and Nancy Fiocca.
During Nancy Wake's lifetime, she was a nurse and journalist who joined the French Resistance and later the Special Operations Executive (SOE) during World War II, and briefly pursued a post-war career as an intelligence officer in the Air Ministry
.
Nancy Wake was known for many things or accomplishments including the following:skillfully tackles problems or challengesgood or moral (strong beliefs or principles)-stands up to or defeats figurative monsters (i.e. dictators, sexism, racism, etc.)was/is devoted more to his or her cause than personal relationshipswilling to sacrifice time and energy to achieve their goalclever, creative, wise, focused-was/is a visionary (has far-reaching ideas)had/has integrity (stands up for what they believe and acts accordingly)Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Nancy Wake was a great woman who did a lot for the humanities.
Learn more about Great Women of History here: https://brainly.com/question/30126631
#SPJ1
What are two reasons why a president might issue a signing statement?
To explain why the bill is being vetoed instead of signed.
To explain how the law should be interpreted.
To describe parts of the law with which he or she disagrees.
To thank the legislative branch for passing the bill
Two reasons for a president to issue a signing statement are to explain how the law should be interpreted and to describe the parts of the law with which he or she disagrees. Here options B and C are correct.
Two reasons why a president might issue a signing statement are:
To explain how the law should be interpreted: A signing statement is a written statement issued by the president when signing a bill into law. It is used to clarify the president's understanding of the law and how it should be implemented. In some cases, a president may issue a signing statement to provide guidance on the interpretation of specific provisions of the law, to help ensure that it is enforced in a manner consistent with the president's policy objectives.
To describe parts of the law with which he or she disagrees: Another reason why a president might issue a signing statement is to express disagreement with specific provisions of the law. While the president may choose to sign a bill into law, there may be certain provisions that he or she disagrees with.
In such cases, a signing statement can be used to communicate the president's objections and explain why he or she is signing the bill into law despite those objections. By issuing a signing statement, the president can also signal to Congress and the public that he or she intends to interpret and implement the law in a manner consistent with his or her own policy priorities.
To learn more about the president
https://brainly.com/question/23963476
#SPJ4
Complete question:
What are two reasons why a president might issue a signing statement?
A - To explain why the bill is being vetoed instead of signed.
B - To explain how the law should be interpreted.
C - To describe parts of the law with which he or she disagrees.
D - To thank the legislative branch for passing the bill
d) who is known as the father of mordern digital computers? Mention his contribution.
Charles Babbage, (born December 26, 1791, London, England—died October 18, 1871, London), English mathematician and inventor i believe
Wat was the main purpose of the government taking over the factories during ww1
Answer:
i think it was because the government had all the jews making bombs for them
Explanation:
Explain what funding the nonprofit organization has decided to use in the following scenario:
Situation: Hurricane Sandy wiped out thousands of homes along the East Coast, especially in the New Jersey/New York areas in October 2012. The board of directors for a nonprofit human services organization in a central state decided to send a sizable donation to help with relief efforts for those in need
In the given scenario, the nonprofit organization has decided to use a sizable donation to fund their relief efforts for those affected by Hurricane Sandy.
Hurricane Sandy wiped out thousands of homes along the East Coast, especially in the New Jersey/New York areas in October 2012. The board of directors made this decision to support the thousands of homes that were wiped out along the East Coast, particularly in the New Jersey/New York areas, in October 2012. This donation will help the nonprofit organization provide assistance to those in need during the aftermath of this devastating natural disaster.
Learn more about Hurricane Sandy: https://brainly.com/question/29414847
#SPJ11
1. Which provides evidence to refute Johnson's argument in this source?
(A) The information in Michael Harrington's 1962 book about poverty
(B) The number of African Americans registered to vote in the South
(C) The reaction to the Brown v. Board of Education decision
(D) The hope of people in other nations to emigrate to the United States
(D) In this source, evidence to refute Dr. Johnson's argument is provided by people's hopes for emigration to the United States.
What was Dr. Johnson's response to Bishop Berkeley?Dr. Samuel Johnson's "kicking a stone" argument against Bishop Berkeley's theory of immaterialism did not actually address the theory; rather, it asserted a conclusion that was incompatible with the theory and then repeated that conclusion without directly addressing the theory's subject matter. Two metaphysical theses are defended by Berkeley in the Principles and the Three Dialogues: Immaterialism asserts that matter does not exist, while idealism asserts that everything that exists either has a mind or is dependent on one.
To learn more about Dr. Johnson visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14229997
#SPJ1
What did the red smear in the cartoon symbolize? (5 points) nuclear arms race between the u. s and soviets guilty verdict in the julius and ethel rosenberg espionage case development of the hydrogen bomb by the u. s. false accusations that communists infiltrated the u. s government
The red smear in the cartoon symbolizes false complaints that communists penetrated the u.s government.
The option (D) is correct.
The political cartoon named "Red Smear" showed up in 1949 when the socialists were arraigned by government authorities. the red smear represented the phony allegations that the socialists penetrated the US government.
The Cold War political cartoons shows principally centered around several specific dangers. America depicted the Soviet Association as a country that was controlled by a despot tyrant who took steps to spread socialism all through the world. Each side utilized political kid's shows to acquire support in their nation and join their country contrary to the next country.
Learn more about red smear:
https://brainly.com/question/26467906
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
What did the red smear in the cartoon symbolize? (5 points)
(A) nuclear arms race between the u. s and soviets.
(B) guilty verdict in the julius and ethel rosenberg espionage.
(C) case development of the hydrogen bomb by the u. s.
(D) false accusations that communists infiltrated the u. s government.
What is the function of the U.S. State Department? to control the federal government's relations with state governments to direct U.S. foreign policy to maintain the federal court system Oto maintain the separation of powers between the branches of government
Answer:
What is the function of the U.S. State Department?
Explanation:
The function of the U.S. State Department is to direct U.S. foreign policy. This includes promoting and protecting U.S. interests abroad, negotiating treaties and agreements with foreign governments, and representing the U.S. in international organizations such as the United Nations. The State Department is responsible for maintaining diplomatic relations with foreign countries and providing assistance to American citizens traveling or living abroad. The State Department is one of the executive branch agencies, and it is headed by the Secretary of State, who is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The function of maintaining the separation of powers between the branches of government is primarily the responsibility of the legislative and judicial branches.
The function of the U.S. State Department is to direct U.S. foreign policy. Thus, an option first is correct.
What is State Department?The Secretary of State, who is selected by the President and approved by the Senate, is in charge of the State Department, one of the executive branch's departments. The legislative and judicial branches of government are principally in charge of upholding the division of powers among the three parts of government.
This includes advancing and defending American interests overseas, negotiating treaties and other agreements with other governments, and repping America in international bodies like the UN. The State Department is in charge of preserving diplomatic ties with other nations and aiding American citizens who are visiting or residing overseas. Hence, an option first is correct.
Learn more about State Department at;
https://brainly.com/question/726875
#SPJ5
In one paragraph, explain how the results of the Kansas-Nebraska Act were different from earlier compromises over slavery. PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!!
Answer:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The long-standing compromise would have to be repealed. While the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 came about due to the debate over the expansion of slavery into new territories, the Kansas-Nebraska Act focused on the economic future of western states.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Question 3/4
In this letter, Simón Bolívar's goal is to
A. become monarch of the strongest country in South America
B. break off diplomatic relations with Europe
C. form one nation that unifies all of South America
D. convince Mexico to join in his fight against Spain
C. Organise South America into a single nation.
From 1825 on, when violent factionalism erupted across northern South America, Bolivar faced difficult times. To end the political deadlock in the liberated areas, he declared himself absolute ruler in 1828.
What was Simón Bolvar trying to accomplish?Bolivar wanted to unify South America into one state. He found that this plan did not work out. He instead oversaw the establishment of the nations that are today's Colombia, Panama, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Venezuela.
What did Simon Bolivar contribute to his nation?He played a crucial part in securing the independence of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and the rest of South America from the Spanish empire, making him one of the most notable political players in the region's liberation.
To know more about Simón Bolívar's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/21126906
#SPJ1
What does the kelp highway Theory of early migration argue
The Kelp Highway Theory of early migration argues that the coastal areas of the Americas were initially populated by people who followed a 'kelp highway' of edible sea life along the coastlines.
What is migration argue?Migration is the movement of people from one place to another, often in search of better living or working conditions. It can happen either within a country, or between two countries. Migration can be voluntary, meaning people choose to leave their home and move somewhere else, or it can be forced, meaning people are forced to leave their homes due to war, famine, or other difficult circumstances.
This theory suggests that early humans were able to travel down the coastlines of the Americas by following the abundance of sea life, which provided them with a reliable food source. Along the way, they encountered new environments and adapted to them, eventually leading to the colonisation of the Americas.
To learn more about migration argue
https://brainly.com/question/637917
#SPJ1
Which was not a result of u. S. Intervention in latin america during the cold war era?.
The option which was not the result of U.S. Intervention in Latin America during the cold war era is option D. The economy of Brazil collapsed.
The Western Bloc and the Eastern Bloc, as well as the United States and the Soviet Union's respective allies, were at odds throughout the Cold War.
Latin America refers to the regions of America where there are Spanish- or Portuguese-speaking populations. During the conflict era, the United States and Russia were the two countries that opposed U.S. intervention the most. In 1954, Operation PBSUCCESS, one of the first in a long line of American interventions in various regions throughout the conflict, deposed the democratically elected President of the Central American nation.
The question is incomplete, find the complete question here
Which was NOT a result of U.S. intervention in Latin America during the Cold War era?
A. The Military took control of Chile
B. Fighting continued against the Guerillas in El Salvador
C. The war between the contras and Sandinistas in Nicaragua intensified.
D. The economy of Brazil collapsed.
To learn more about Cold War here
brainly.com/question/26831734
#SPJ4
what is the message of the cartoon
The political cartoon published by the Chicago Tribune in 1964 employs satire as a means of critiquing Senator Johnson's stance against the Civil Rights Bill.
Why is this so?By highlighting contradictions and obstacles in the fight for civil rights, the cartoonist seeks to bring attention to the senator's obstruction of progress.
The figure wearing a hat and represented as Senator Johnson, stumbles over a brick labeled "Senator Johnson's Opposition to Civil Rights Bill," signifying his role in hindering civil rights progress.
Upon analyzing the cartoon's contents, it becomes clear that its primary message is a sharp condemnation of individuals obstructing the path towards societal advancements in relation to civil rights.
Learn more about Civil Rights Bill at:
https://brainly.com/question/14270752
#SPJ1
what similarities are there between russia, germany, and italy in their desire for political change (rise of the totalitarian states)
Answer:
These are some similarities
Explanation:
There were multiple similarities between Russia, Germany, and Italy in their desire for political change and the rise of totalitarian states
1. Economic instability: All three countries had suffered economic instability due to the aftermath of World War I which led to hyperinflation, unemployment, and poverty. This created a fertile ground for the rise of extremist political movements.
2. Nationalism: The three countries shared a strong sense of nationalism and yearning for their past glory. Leaders such as Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini capitalized on this sentiment to promote their agendas.
3. Propaganda and censorship: The totalitarian regimes that emerged in these countries effectively used propaganda and censorship to control the flow of information and manipulate public opinion.
4. Single-party rule: All three countries were ruled by a single-party with dictatorial power. Opposition parties were banned, and dissent was brutally suppressed.
5. Military expansionism: The totalitarian regimes in Russia, Germany, and Italy sought to expand their territories and exert their dominance on the world stage through military aggression.
How did president lyndon b. Johnson respond to this event?.
In response to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, President Lyndon B. Johnson issued a proclamation of mourning and instructed the American people to honor the memory of the fallen president.
He declared a national day of mourning and ordered flags to be flown at half-staff and in silence for thirty days. He also called for an investigation into the assassination and for Congress to pass legislation to protect civil rights for all Americans.
He also delivered a powerful speech in which he asked the nation to continue Kennedy's legacy and honor his memory, declaring, "No memorial oration or eulogy could more eloquently honor President Kennedy's memory than the earliest possible passage of the civil rights bill for which he fought so long.
We have suffered a loss that cannot be weighed. For me, it is a deep personal tragedy. I know the world shares the sorrow that Mrs. Kennedy and her family bear. I will do my best. That is all I can do. I ask for your help—and God's.”
To know more about Lyndon B. Johnson, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2608910
#SPJ4
The Question is -
How did president lyndon b. Johnson respond to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy?.
Directions: For each vocabulary term listed, write a definition in your own words.
Humanism
Secular
Patron
Mona Lisa
Perspective
The Prince
Vernacular
Usury
Medici Family
Answer:
Humanism: A philosophy that emphasizes the importance of human values, dignity, and capabilities.
Secular: Not related to religion or spiritual matters.
Patron: A person or group that supports an artist, writer, or other creative individual or endeavor.
Mona Lisa: A famous portrait painting by Leonardo da Vinci of a woman with a mysterious smile.
Perspective: The technique of representing a three-dimensional object or scene on a two-dimensional surface in a way that creates the illusion of depth and space.
The Prince: A political treatise by Niccolo Machiavelli, which provides advice to rulers on how to gain and maintain power.
Vernacular: The language or dialect spoken by ordinary people in a particular country or region.
Usury: The practice of lending money at an excessively high rate of interest.
Medici Family: An Italian banking and political family that rose to prominence in the 15th century and played a significant role in the development of Florence during the Renaissance.
Arrange the events in Myanmar's history in chronological order using the numbers 1-6.
General Aung San negotiates for Burma's independence. He is assassinated six months before independence is granted.
King Bayinnaung succeeds in recapturing all lost land to form the Second Bamar Empire.
Three wars against Great Britain lead to Myanmar becoming a British colony.
Military leader Anawrahta unites most of Myanmar to form the First Bamar Empire.
British and American forces recapture Burma during World War II.
An election places Myanmar under civilian rule. Reforms under President Thein Sein give the people of Myanmar hope
Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, has a rich and complex history that spans several centuries. The events in Myanmar's history can be arranged chronologically as follows:
Military leader Anawrahta unites most of Myanmar to form the First Bamar Empire, establishing a strong central government and spreading Theravada Buddhism throughout the region.King Bayinnaung succeeds in recapturing all lost land to form the Second Bamar Empire, extending its influence into modern-day Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia.Three wars against Great Britain lead to Myanmar becoming a British colony, with the British Empire imposing its rule and exploiting its resources for over a century.General Aung San negotiates for Burma's independence. He is assassinated six months before independence is granted, leading to a period of instability and conflict.British and American forces recapture Burma during World War II, leading to a brief period of Japanese occupation before Myanmar regains its independence in 1948.An election places Myanmar under civilian rule. Reforms under President Thein Sein give the people of Myanmar hope for a brighter future, though the country still faces challenges in areas such as human rights and political freedoms.It is important to understand Myanmar's history in order to contextualize its current challenges and opportunities. The country has faced colonization, military rule, and periods of political unrest, but has also shown resilience and a desire for change.
The recent election and democratic reforms demonstrate a hopeful path forward, but there is still much work to be done to ensure the well-being and rights of all Myanmar's citizens.
To know more about Myanmar refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/8778308
#SPJ11
For auto manufacturers, this situation showed the importance of
A) assembly line production.
B) international marketing.
C) interchangeable parts.
D) quality control systems.
In 1908, three Cadillac automobiles were taken to a London exhibition and completely disassembled. Eighty-nine random parts were removed and then were replaced from a stock of Cadillac dealer parts. They were then reassembled and driven 500 miles without problem.
For auto manufacturers, this situation showed the importance of C. interchangeable parts.
How was this importance shown ?The scenario presented illustrates the success of interchangeable parts, a manufacturing practice that entails creating equivalent and replaceable components for a product.
The demonstration testing whether three Cadillacs could function using 89 varying pieces exchanged with uniform parts showcased how effective this strategy is in auto manufacturing. It was established that it's possible to fully substitute identical units obtained from a dealer without consequence. This exhibition touted the advantages of utilizing interchangeable parts in production processes.
Find out more on auto manufacturers at https://brainly.com/question/10573865
#SPJ1
Which individual would most likely be a member of the lower class in a 19th- century city in the North?
A. A plantation owner
B. An accountant
C. A factory worker
D. A lawyer
Which country was not located in one of the three theaters of world war ii?.
The country that was not located in one of the three theaters of World War II was Switzerland.
During World War II, the three main theaters of the war were the European Theater, the Pacific Theater, and the African/Middle Eastern Theater. Switzerland, however, remained neutral throughout the war and was not involved in any of the fighting that occurred in these theaters.
Despite being surrounded by Axis powers and Allied powers, Switzerland managed to maintain its neutrality by enforcing strict military, economic, and political policies. Switzerland served as a safe haven for refugees and was also a center of espionage and intelligence gathering during the war.
To know more about World War II , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ4
Why is the rule of law an important concept to protect people's rights?
Write a short response identifying two reasons the Mughal and Ottoman Empires were successful
Two reasons the Mughal and Ottoman Empires were successful are provided below:
Why the Mughal and Ottoman Empires were successfulThe excellent administrative structures of the Mughal and Ottoman Empires contributed to their success. Both empires featured a centralized government with a well-organized bureaucracy that effectively controlled the state's affairs.
Another factor that contributed to their success was their tolerance for variety. Both empires were made up of many ethnic and religious groups that were free to practice their own customs and traditions.
Learn more about Mughal and Ottoman Empires at https://brainly.com/question/29376870
#SPJ1
Answer:
Comparing the Mughal and Ottoman Empires
Write a short response identifying two reasons the Mughal and Ottoman Empires were successful.
The excellent administrative structures of the Mughal and Ottoman Empires contributed to their success. Both empires featured a centralized government with a well-organized bureaucracy that effectively controlled the state's affairs.
Sample response: Both the Mughal and the Ottoman Empires were successful because they focused on religious tolerance. They allowed people to choose and practice their own faith. They also were accepting of diverse cultures. The Mughal and Ottoman Empires focused a great deal on trade and expansion and tried to impose fair laws to their citizens.
What did you include in your answer?
Both empires practiced religious tolerance.
Both empires were accepting of diverse cultures.
Both empires tried to expand their territory.
Both empires tried to expand trade.
Both empires tried to impose fair laws to citizens.
Explanation:
Committee hearings can occur in the Texas State House and the Texas State Senate
True
False
Committee hearings can occur in both the Texas State House and the Texas State Senate. True.
These hearings provide an opportunity for legislators to hear from experts and the public on proposed bills and to ask questions and gather information before deciding how to vote on the bill. Committees are an important part of the legislative process, as they allow for in-depth analysis and discussion of specific issues related to the proposed legislation.
After the hearing, the committee may vote to advance the bill, make amendments to it, or vote to kill the bill, depending on the outcome of the hearing and the opinions of the committee members.
Learn more about Texas State House
https://brainly.com/question/4728656
#SPJ4
PLEASE GIVE A FULL ANSWER AND PLEASE HELP ME ASAP PLEASEEEE
1. Describe the political activism of Oscar Romero and its consequences.
- Please help give a full answer please
2. Explain how Mikhail Gorbachev contributed to the collapse of communism in the
Soviet Union.
- Please help give a full answer please
3. Describe the living conditions in communism in the 1980s.
- Please help give a full answer please
El Salvadorian political leader Oscar Romero was killed in 1980. The policies of Mikhail Gorbachev caused the Soviet Union's communism to fall. The standard of living in communism was frequently poor.
A Catholic priest named Oscar Romero became an activist in El Salvador, speaking out against oppression and brutality by the government. It was because he supported social justice and human rights that he was murdered in 1980. To modernise the political and economic system, Mikhail Gorbachev, the last General Secretary of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union, adopted the glasnost and perestroika policies.
This caused greater public criticism and eventually contributed to the fall of communism in 1991. The 1980s saw a variety of living situations under communism, including low living standards and political persecution, even as the state provided services like healthcare and education.
Learn more about Oscar Romero:
https://brainly.com/question/15653166
#SPJ4