What happened in the 1960's in Quebec?

United States raided the borders of Canada.
Radicals demanded more recognition of their heritage.
Voters rejected a separation referendum.
The Quebec Act was passed by the British.

Random answers and links will be reported!

Answer:

They are all correct

Explanation:

Answer:

When died he was 56 Years old

Answer:

B xx

Explanation:

Answer:

SO basically yeah ik its so easy cmon u got thsi

Explanation:

Answer:

ta you

Explanation:

An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, an article, a pamphlet, and a short story. Essays have traditionally been sub-classified as formal and informal.An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, an article, a pamphlet, and a short story. Essays have traditionally been sub-classified as formal and informal.An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, an article, a pamphlet, and a short story. Essays have traditionally been sub-classified as formal and informal.An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, an article, a pamphlet, and a short story. Essays have traditionally been sub-classified as formal and informal.An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, an article, a pamphlet, and a short story. Essays have traditionally been sub-classified as formal and informal.An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, an article, a pamphlet, and a short story. Essays have traditionally been sub-classified as formal and informal.

Answer:

Con 1

Parents may control what their own children read, but don't have a right to restrict what books are available to other people.

Parents who don’t like specific books can have their kids “opt out” of an assignment without infringing on the rights of others. The National Coalition against Censorship explained that “Even books or materials that many find ‘objectionable’ may have educational value, and the decision about what to use in the classroom should be based on professional judgments and standards, not individual preferences.” [6] In the 1982 Supreme Court ruling on Board of Education v. Pico, Justice Brennan wrote that taking books off of library shelves could violate students’ First Amendment rights, adding that “Local school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books.” [21]

Con 2

Many frequently challenged books help people get a better idea of the world and their place in it.

Robie H. Harris, author of frequently challenged children’s books including It’s Perfectly Normal: Changing Bodies, Growing up, Sex, and Sexual Health, stated, “I think these books look at the topics, the concerns, the worry, the fascination that kids have today… It’s the world in which they’re living.” [8] Many books that have long been considered to be required reading to become educated about literature and American history are frequently challenged, such as: The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, The Color Purple by Alice Walker, Beloved by Toni Morrison, and Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston. [9] 46 of the Radcliffe Publishing Group’s “Top 100 Novels of the 20th Century” are frequently challenged; banning them would deprive students of essential cultural and historical knowledge, as well as differing points of view. [9]

Con 3

Books are a portal to different life experiences and reading encourages empathy and social-emotional development.

One study found that reading J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series, which is frequently challenged for religious concerns about witchcraft, “improved attitudes” about immigrants, homosexuals, and refugees. [11] Another study found that reading narrative fiction helped readers understand their peers and raised social abilities. [12][13] A study in Basic and Applied Social Psychology found that people who read a story about a Muslim woman were less likely to make broad judgments based on race. [14] Neil Gaiman, author of the frequently challenged novel Neverwhere, among other books, stated that fiction “build[s] empathy… You get to feel things, visit places and worlds you would never otherwise know. You learn that everyone else out there is a me, as well. You’re being someone else, and when you return to your own world, you’re going to be slightly changed. Empathy is a tool for building people into groups, for allowing us to function as more than self-obsessed individuals.” [15]

Explanation:

Answer:

provide three things that are bad about those books i am guesing, i mean your not ginving me much to work with here

Explanation:

Answer:

Two within a hour

Explanation:

I think the answer is one.

I'm not sure though

Answer:

A whole paragraph tho good luck with that that's hard might need a uhh expert or something i can i just don't feel like writing a whole Paragraph

Explanation:

Do you think that fighting between all of the different groups of people would have ever stopped? yes, it would of eventually had to stop because of what they wanted such as something like props, weapons , and more.

Do you think your family would have survived for much longer? Yes, but we would need more food and props to survive. We will also have to be in a secured area. last but not least we would have to be smart and make the right decisions.

Answer:

B.Disease

Explanation:

Because people weren't immune to these new diseases which was a cause of big death rate during that era.

Answer:

It's B disease

Explanation:

Answer:

Overview

Mercantilism, an economic theory that rejected free trade and promoted government regulation of the economy for the purpose of enhancing state power, defined the economic policy of European colonizing countries.

Christopher Columbus introduced horses, sugar plants, and disease to the New World, while facilitating the introduction of New World commodities like sugar, tobacco, chocolate, and potatoes to the Old World.

The process by which commodities, people, and diseases crossed the Atlantic is known as the Columbian Exchange.

Commerce in the New World

As Europeans expanded their market reach into the colonial sphere, they devised a new economic policy to ensure the colonies’ profitability. The philosophy of mercantilism shaped European perceptions of wealth from the 1500s to the late 1700s. Mercantilism held that only a limited amount of wealth, as measured in gold and silver bullion, existed in the world. In order to gain power, nations had to amass wealth by mining these precious raw materials from their colonial possessions. Mercantilists did not believe in free trade, arguing instead that the nation should control trade to create wealth and to enhance state power. In this view, colonies existed to strengthen the colonizing nation.

Colonial mercantilism, a set of protectionist policies designed to benefit the colonizing nation, relied on several factors:

Colonies rich in raw materials

Cheap labor

Colonial loyalty to the home government

Control of the shipping trade

Under this system, the colonies sent their raw materials—harvested by enslaved people or native workers—to Europe. European industry then produced and sent finished materials—like textiles, tools, manufactured goods, and clothing—back to the colonies. Colonists were forbidden from trading with other countries.

Commodification quickly affected production in the New World. American silver, tobacco, and other items—which were used by native peoples for ritual purposes—became European commodities with monetary value. Before the arrival of the Spanish, for example, the Inca people of the Andes consumed chicha, a corn beer, for ritual purposes only. When the Spanish discovered chicha, they bought and traded for it, detracting from its spiritual significance for market gain. This process disrupted native economies and spurred early commercial capitalism.

Explanation:

Hope it helps please BRAINLIEST

Answer:

False

Explanation:

bshsshsjiwssiisksksnxb sjjsjsjss

The answer to the completed table are

are f(0) = 20, f(1) = 20/3, f(2) = 20/9, f(3) = 20/27

The function can be written as

[tex]f(t) = 20*(\frac{1}{3})^t[/tex]

We have to fill in the value of t at all points in the table into the formula that have been written above.

f(t) = 0

[tex]f(t) = 20*(\frac{1}{3})^0\\\\= 20[/tex]

[tex]f(t) = 20*(\frac{1}{3})^1\\\\\frac{20}{3}[/tex]

f(t) = 2

[tex]f(t) = 20*(\frac{1}{3})^2 \\\\= \frac{20}{9}[/tex]

for f(t) = 3

[tex]f(t) = 20*(\frac{1}{3})^3\\\\= \frac{20}{27}[/tex]

The completed table is contained in the attachment uploaded.

Read more on graph functions here: https://brainly.com/question/24696306

Answer:

"I am not a friend of a very vigorous government," Jefferson once declared, referring to Hamilton's main goal of more efficient organization. Jefferson feared tyranny and thought in terms of freedom, whereas Hamilton feared chaos and thought in terms of order.

Explanation:

These are some of the differences that they had.. (I am just saying that im kinda a expert in Hamilton... I know every single one of the songs and some of his history) Good Luck! Have a wonderful day! :)

Answer:

B. $602.44

Explanation:

Answer:

The Answer is a Protestant

Explanation:

Answer:

Calhoun thought that states had the authority to determine whether or not a legislation was constitutional.

Webster thought that the national good should take precedence over the interests of individual states.

Explanation:

The federal government's exclusive powers enable the country to function as a whole. However, the states retain a great deal of power. States are responsible for all elections, including presidential elections, and must ratify constitutional revisions.

In 1811, he was elected to the United States House of Representatives, where he served nearly four terms until quitting to become Secretary of War under President James Monroe from 1817 to 1825. Calhoun was well-known in both posts for his strong advocacy for federally sponsored internal reforms.

His response to South Carolina Senator Robert Hayne is regarded as one of the best speeches ever delivered in Congress, in which Webster defended the federal government, declaring that "Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable."

For more information about Webster’s and Calhoun’s refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1022519

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Answer:

No for both

Explanation:

Answer:

so the reader can know where hes from to get a picture regarding some of the story. this also helps with any conflict and any confusion

Explanation:

:)

Answer:

Hi dude

Explanation:

:)