One instance is seen in the prayers of slaveholders who used Christianity to excuse their ownership and ill-treatment of enslaved people. These slave owners would go to church and pray, but their actions away from the church belied their alleged faith. They would keep treating slaves as property rather than as persons made in the likeness of God.
The life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth serve as the foundation of the Abrahamic monotheistic religion of Christianity, commonly referred to as Christianism. It is the most significant and widely practiced religion, with almost 2.4 billion adherents, or one-third of the world's population. In 157 countries and territories, Christians—those who follow it—are regarded to be the majority of the population.
Most Christians maintain the belief that Jesus is the Son of God, who's coming as the Messiah was prophesied in the Hebrew Bible (known in Christianity as the Old Testament) and recorded in the New Testament. With regard to Christology, Ecclesiology, Ordination, and the nature of Justification and Redemption, Christianity still has Western and Eastern branches.
Learn more about Christianity here:
brainly.com/question/3749222
#SPJ4
What is precedence and how is it used in the courts?
Responses
It is the title given to the first decision made by the court on a specific subject and is used to help determine all future rulings on that subject.
It is the title given to the first decision made by the court on a specific subject and is used to help determine all future rulings on that subject.
It is the chief Security Officer for the Court and they make all decisions for Court Safety.
It is the chief Security Officer for the Court and they make all decisions for Court Safety.
It is the primary system used to build Laws and it impact all citizens.
It is the primary system used to build Laws and it impact all citizens.
It is the system used to determine the rank and order of the Judges from top to bottom and allows everyone to know who is in charge.
It is the system used to determine the rank and order of the Judges from top to bottom and allows everyone to know who is in charge.
The precedence is the title given to the first decision made by the court on a specific subject and is used to help determine all future rulings on that subject. Thus the correct option is A
The court refers to a judiciary body that helps in resolving disputes and conflicts by making a fair decsion or establishing a settlement between both the parties involved in conflicts.
In the context of the courts, precedence means that lower courts are compelled to follow the legal principles established by higher courts in previous instances. Precedent contributes to uniformity, predictability, and stability in the interpretation and execution of the law.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ1
Which conflict did the United States enter after a surprise attack on the U.S. naval fleet in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii?
O World War II
O Vietnam War
O First Gulf War
O Spanish-American War
Answer:
World War 2
Explanation:
Just World War 2 after a surprise attack on the U.S naval fleet in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.
2 ANALYZING What is meant by, "Resolved, that it is our duty to peril life, liberty, and property, in behalf of the fugitive slave, to as great an extent as we would peril them in behalf of ourselves"?
The statement expresses the moral duty to risk one's own safety to aid fugitive slaves and peril life, emphasizing fundamental rights for all.
The assertion "Settled, that it is our obligation to danger life, freedom, and property, for benefit of the outlaw slave, to as extraordinary a degree as we would risk them for sake of ourselves" communicates areas of strength for an in the ethical constraint to safeguard the privileges of criminal slaves.
It proposes that people have an obligation to gamble with their own security and prosperity to help the individuals who are looking for independence from bondage.
The expression "risk life, freedom, and property" shows the seriousness of the circumstance looked by criminal slaves, who were frequently pursued down and rebuffed for endeavoring to get away from bondage.
By proposing that one ought to risk their own wellbeing to safeguard the opportunity of others, the assertion features the desperation and significance of the main thing in need of attention.
The correlation between taking a chance with one's security for sake of an outlaw slave versus for benefit of oneself underlines that all people have similar inborn freedoms, no matter what their race or status as a slave.
It proposes that opportunity and freedom are not honors to be delighted in by some and denied to other people, yet rather key privileges that should be safeguarded for all.
Generally speaking, this explanation mirrors the moral and moral contemplations that drove numerous people to become abolitionists and work towards the finish of subjugation. It features that giving up of one's own priorities is important to accomplish civil rights and that the freedoms, all things considered, ought to be safeguarded, no matter what the conditions.
To learn more about peril, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29887420
#SPJ4
majority opinion oral arguments petition for a Orville was arrested for protesting on a public sidewalk about the need to stop global warming. His lawyer argued that the arrest was unconstitutional because the First Amendment gives Orville the right to speak freely and petition the government. A jury found Orville guilty and sentenced him to twenty years in prison. The appeals court affirmed (agreed with) the jury's decision. Orville's attorneys filed a appellate Jurisdictio with the Supreme Court, asking them to hear Orville's case under its authority. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, beginning its 6 STOP GLOBAL WARMING process. As attorneys for the Orville's attorneys had to file their first. At the Orville's attorneys argued forcefully that Orville's rights had been violated and the Supreme Court justices asked many questions. After discussing the case in a conference, the Supreme Court decided unanimously that Orville's First Amendment rights had been violated. Later that month, the Supreme Court issued its overturning the lower court decisions and IVICS 2019 iCivics, Inc. setting Orville free! Activity-Side
Orville was detained and given a punishment for demonstrating against global warming on a pavement. His attorneys filed an appeal with the Supreme Court, which unanimously reversed the judgement of the lower court and freed Orville on the grounds of First Amendment rights.
What criteria define a Supreme Court oral argument?The Court hears oral arguments in about 70–80 cases each year.. The Justices can directly question the lawyers defending the parties to the case throughout the arguments, and the lawyers can draw attention to any points they believe to be particularly crucial.
What serves as the basis for oral argument?You have the opportunity to further develop your brief's arguments before the appellate court during the oral argument. You may. Clarify the points you made in your brief, highlight your arguments those you believe are most crucial to the court's consideration, and respond to inquiries from the judges.
To know more about Amendment rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13163035
#SPJ1
what were european explorers searching for when they sailed to the americas?
Answer:
Along with the idea of looking for new trade routes (to India), they also hoped to find new sources of gold, silver, and other valuables.
Additionally, Europeans saw exploration as a way to bring Christianity to
other cultures that lived in other lands.
While some explorers sailed around Africa to Asia, others thought they could find a quicker route by sailing west.
These voyages led to the unexpected discovery of new lands, as sailors bound for Asia came to the Caribbean islands and the continents of North America and South America.
European explorers were searching for new trade routes, resources, and opportunities for wealth and power when they sailed to the Americas.
Beginning in the late 15th century, European explorers, such as Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand Magellan, and Francis Drake, set out to find new trade routes to Asia and the East Indies, hoping to bypass the costly and dangerous land routes that were controlled by Islamic empires. Along the way, they discovered the Americas and encountered new resources such as gold, silver, tobacco, and potatoes.
European nations saw these resources as opportunities for wealth and power, leading to the colonization and exploitation of indigenous populations. The search for new territories and resources ultimately led to the establishment of European colonies in the Americas and the transatlantic slave trade.
Learn more about European explorers: https://brainly.com/question/13335713
#SPJ11
Similar to the confederate statues, the statue of
christopher columbus is also a symbol of past and
present bigotry. for indigenous communities
specifically, it is a reminder of their conquest, which
can be described as apocalyptic. the columbus
statue stands as a monument to the near genocide
of indigenous peoples throughout the americas
and if left standing, it will remain a symbol of their
continued oppression as indigenous peoples
throughout this nation, as well as this continent,
are disenfranchised, segregated, or they live in
inadequate housing, they struggle with access to
health care and are victims of continued
violence. removing the monument, therefore,
serves several purposes. first, it confronts racism,
and at present, it is not enough to be non-racist; we
must be anti-racist. second, removing this symbol
of racism is a step in the right direction towards
repairing the injustices committed against
indigenous populations everywhere. your task is to
make a case for or against the removal of
confederate statues and statues of christopher
columbus.
Statues of Christopher Columbus and Confederate leaders can represent oppression and bigotry for marginalized communities. Removing them can confront racism and repair injustices, while leaving them standing may perpetuate systemic inequalities. The decision to remove or keep these statues should be based on a thoughtful consideration of their significance and impact.
The case for removal:
1. The Confederate statues and the statue of Christopher Columbus are symbols of past and present bigotry. For Indigenous communities, these monuments are reminders of their conquest, which can be described as apocalyptic.
2. These statues stand as monuments to the near genocide of Indigenous peoples throughout the Americas. If left standing, they will remain symbols of continued oppression, as Indigenous people face disenfranchisement, segregation, inadequate housing, limited access to healthcare, and continued violence.
3. Removing these monuments serves several purposes. First, it confronts racism, and at present, it is not enough to be non-racist; we must be anti-racist. Second, removing these symbols of racism is a step in the right direction towards repairing the injustices committed against Indigenous populations everywhere.
The case against removal:
1. Some argue that the removal of these statues erases history and that they serve as important reminders of the past. By keeping these monuments, society can learn from the mistakes made during those times.
2. Another argument is that the removal of these statues could lead to a slippery slope where other monuments with controversial histories may also be removed or altered.
3. Finally, some people believe that the resources and energy spent on removing these statues could be better directed towards implementing policies and initiatives to improve the lives of marginalized communities today.
In conclusion, there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate. Ultimately, the decision to remove or keep Confederate statues and statues of Christopher Columbus should be carefully considered and should take into account the feelings and opinions of those most affected by these symbols.
To know more about Christopher Columbus refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28187018#
#SPJ11
3. 3. 8 Practice: Comparing the French and American Revolutions
The French and American Revolutions sought to depose monarchs in favour of democracy. The American strategy was effective, but the French strategy was chaotic and ultimately to Napoleon.
Both the French and American Revolutions were attempts to depose monarchs and create democratic democracies. They did, however, use different approaches and achieve different results. The American Revolution was started by a desire for representation and taxation without permission, resulting in a successful independence movement and the foundation of a democratic government.
In contrast, the French Revolution was powered by a complex combination of political, social, and economic causes, resulting in a time of turbulence, bloodshed, and, finally, the emergence of Napoleon Bonaparte. While both revolutions had a significant impact on world history, their paths and outcomes diverged significantly.
Learn more about American Revolutions:
https://brainly.com/question/29648454
#SPJ4
How did civil rights legislation in 1975 and 1990 affect education for children with disabilities?
Individual Education Plans were determined to be discriminatory.
Children with disabilities were given equal access to public education.
Separate schools were created to educate children with disabilities.
Individual assistance was no longer provided for children with disabilities.
Answer:
B) Children with disabilities were given equal access to public education.
Do any of you consistently vote for one party at the national level and another party at the state level? Why or why not? How prevalent do you think this practice is?
Some individuals vote for one party at the national level and another at the state level. This may occur due to differences in policies and priorities between the levels of government.
The practice of voting for different parties at the national and state levels can be attributed to various factors.
Some individuals may align with a particular party's national policies, such as foreign relations, defense, or economic management, but prefer the state-level policies of another party on issues like education, healthcare, or infrastructure. Additionally, local issues and candidates can play a significant role in voters' decisions at the state level.
The prevalence of this practice varies among regions and demographics, and it is difficult to provide an exact percentage.
However, it's worth noting that split-ticket voting, which refers to voting for candidates from different parties on the same ballot, has declined in recent years as political polarization has increased. Nonetheless, some voters still choose to vote for different parties at different levels of government based on their specific priorities and concerns.
To know more about demographics click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13146758#
#SPJ11
Describe the content of the letter that had the greatest emotional effect on you. What was it about this letter that made you react respond the way you did emotionally, physically, pychologically.
The content of a letter that has the greatest emotional effect on someone can vary greatly. It could be a love letter from someone special, a goodbye letter from a loved one who has passed away, a letter of forgiveness or apology, or a letter that brings unexpected news.
The emotional impact of the letter can depend on the recipient's personal experiences and current emotional state. The way someone responds emotionally, physically, and psychologically to a letter can also vary depending on the content and the individual's coping mechanisms. Some may cry, feel overwhelmed with emotion, or even experience physical symptoms such as shaking or sweating. Others may feel numb, in shock, or go through a range of complex emotions and thoughts. Ultimately, the way someone reacts to a letter is deeply personal and can reveal a lot about their inner world and current state of mind.
Know more about a letter:
https://brainly.com/question/28059759
#SPJ11
Which people believes in the divine right of king in the reformation and state consolation
Protestant rulers believes in the divine right of king in the reformation and state consolation.
During the Protestant Reformation, the concept of the divine right of kings remained relevant in British Christianity. Throughout this period, belief in divine right enabled Protestant rulers to redefine and maintain authority.
The frontispiece of The Great Bible (1540) depicts God whispering to King Henry VIII and the king relaying God's message to the English people. The monarch has become the conduit through which God's authority flows.
Dr. Munro then introduced the pupils to Divine Command Theory, which our A Level religion and philosophy students study. She also introduced the girls to arguments that contradict Divine Command Theory, which is a vital skill to have while studying religion and philosophy.
To know more about divine right to king:
https://brainly.com/question/30341091
#SPJ4
Highlight the word(s) modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
nelson muntz tried to scrub the invisible ink out of the woven
carpet.
Word 'scrub' modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
The term "modified" can apply to any form of modification or change done to something. It can relate to adjustments made to real-world things, procedures, and even concepts. For instance, a modified car is one that has undergone some sort of modification, such receiving new components or getting a new coat of paint.
A modified process is one that has undergone some sort of change or adaptation, such as a new technique of production or a different approach to handling customer service. Last but not least, modified concepts are those that have undergone some kind of transformation or adaptation, like a fresh interpretation of an old notion.
To learn more about modification link is here
brainly.com/question/15051675
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Highlight the word(s) modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
"Nelson Muntz tried to scrub the invisible ink out of the woven carpet."
COMMUNIST
PARADISE
"I CAN'T BELIEVE MY EYES!"
A. Who is the man at the front of the line? (2 points)
B. What is happening below the clouds? (5 points)
C. How do the men in the clouds feel about what is happening on the ground! (3
points)
13. What is the overall message of the political cartoon? (10 points)
t. In your opinion was the fall of the Soviet Union a good thing or bad thing/ Use
what you have learned in class to explain your reasoning,. (10 points)
Cartoon depicts Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and Joseph Stalin, who are resting on a cloud labelled "Communist Paradise," looking down in dismay at Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev, who is leading a funeral procession carrying a coffin labelled "Communism."
What does it imply?Between 1985 and 1990, Gorbachev steered his country's foreign relations in a new conciliatory direction, signing a series of arms control treaties with Presidents Reagan and Bush, withdrawing Soviet troops from Afghanistan, and improving relations with China. In Russia's union republics, he also devolved power from the Communist Party to elected legislatures. These events, along with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the unification of East and West Germany, heralded the end of the Cold War.
To know about Soviet troops visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10580626
#SPJ1
You can find basic information about the Battle of Britain and the Blitz, the Holocaust, and Japanese internment camps at the following resources: The Battle of Britain e The Blitz The Holocaust Japanese American Internment Once you have chosen your topic, you will write to conduct some research and gather information. Your paper should reference at least two sources. Part A Once you have chosen your topic, you should write up an initial research question that will drive your paper. The answer to this question will form your thesis. Learn more about writing strong thesis statements e. In the space provided, write down your research question and your thesis statement.
The Holocaust was a systematic genocide of six million Jews perpetrated by the Nazi regime during World War II, utilizing concentration and extermination camps, mass shootings, and other forms of violence.
Topic: The Holocaust
Research Question: How did the Nazi regime systematically perpetrate the genocide of six million Jews during the Holocaust?
Thesis Statement: The Holocaust was a meticulously planned and executed genocide of six million Jews, orchestrated by the Nazi regime in Germany during World War II. The regime implemented a system of concentration and extermination camps, as well as mass shootings and other forms of violence, to systematically eliminate European Jewry.
The Nazi ideology of racial purity and anti-Semitism provided the justification for this heinous crime against humanity. Understanding the methods used by the Nazi regime to perpetrate the Holocaust is crucial in order to prevent similar atrocities from occurring in the future. In this paper, I will explore the mechanisms of the Holocaust and its devastating impact on the Jewish people.
To learn more about Holocaust
https://brainly.com/question/14407250
#SPJ4
11. What is this drawing of a camp meeting most likely illustrating? (1 point
A. The lack of reform movements in the United States
B. The large influence revivals had on Americans
C. The rise in the formation of women's trade unions
D. The increase in support of American men for women's suffrage
The drawing of a camp meeting is most likely illustrating the large influence that revivals had on Americans during the 19th century.
Hence, the correct option is B.
Camp meetings were a popular form of religious gathering that involved preaching, singing, and other religious activities intended to revive people's commitment to their faith. These events often drew large crowds and had a significant impact on American society, particularly in the areas of religion and spirituality.
However, the drawing is not related to the rise in the formation of women's trade unions or the increase in support of American men for women's suffrage, as these were social and political movements that emerged at a later time period and had different historical contexts.
To know more about camp here
https://brainly.com/question/30137758
#SPJ1
To what extent are fascists and socialists advocating goals for their respective ideologies?
Fascists and socialists advocate for different goals and have distinct ideological approaches.
Fascism is a far-right ideology that emphasizes authoritarianism, nationalism, and the suppression of individual rights in favor of the collective. The primary goal of fascism is to create a unified national identity and establish a strong, centralized government led by a powerful dictator. Fascists prioritize order, hierarchy, and military strength, often glorifying violence and warfare.
On the other hand, socialism is a left-wing ideology that aims to promote economic and social equality through the redistribution of wealth and resources. Socialists advocate for a more democratic and participatory government, with the goal of eliminating class distinctions and creating a more equitable society. Socialists prioritize social welfare, education, and healthcare, often emphasizing the importance of workers' rights and collective ownership of the means of production.
While both fascism and socialism advocate for specific goals, the nature of those goals and the means of achieving them are fundamentally different. Fascism seeks to establish a dominant, centralized government with a narrow focus on national interests, while socialism seeks to promote equality and democratization of government and economic systems. Overall, the goals of fascism and socialism are largely incompatible, and their ideological differences are reflected in their respective policies and approaches to governance.
To learn more about Fascists refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12896881
#SPJ11
Which statement describes a reason why some US leaders disagree with the policy of containment.
what is the meaning of the phrase "separation of church and state"? What part of the constitution guarantees this separation?
The meaning of the phrase "separation of church and state" is that there would be no governmental establishment or preference of a religion which is a free exercise clause .
What is separation of church and state?The separation of religion and government mandated can be described as the act of separation of church and state" .
It should be noted that this stressed that as regards the establishment clause as well as free exercise clause of the U.S. Constitution the forbids governmental establishment should notcome out to support or carry out a particular religion, which implies that there would be freedom from governmental intrusion with religion.
Learn more about separation of church and state at:
https://brainly.com/question/9639261
#SPJ1
Writing activity 8: read this statement again: "we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."in a word document, identify why this statement is truer today than it was when the framers first wrote it. give at least 3 examples to back your explanation.
The statement "all men are created equal" is truer today than when the framers first wrote it due to increased civil rights, legal equality, and social acceptance of diverse populations.
1. Civil rights: The framers of the Constitution wrote the statement in a time when slavery was still prevalent and women didn't have equal rights. Since then, significant progress has been made, such as the abolition of slavery, the Civil Rights Act, and the Women's Suffrage movement, which expanded rights and protections to marginalized groups.
2. Legal equality: Today, the principle of equality under the law is more robust, with laws and policies prohibiting discrimination based on race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation. This has led to a more equitable legal system where everyone has a right to fair treatment.
3. Social acceptance: Society has evolved to become more accepting of diverse populations. This progress is exemplified by the increasing representation of minorities in media, business, and politics, as well as the growing acceptance of LGBTQ+ rights, which contributes to a more equal society.
To know more about Civil rights click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/21057720#
#SPJ11
Please help me figure out these answers? :)
6. Both wars were related to communism, and the Cold War was a war fought between the U.S.A. and the U.S.S.R. about the idealogy of communism.
7. The Uprising of 1953 in East Germany was related to the Cold War as it was workers in East Berlin rising in protest against government demands to increase productivity. Within days, nearly a million East Germans joined the protests and began rioting across hundreds of East German cities and towns. The East Berlin forces were violently suppressed by the Soviet Union, showing that the U.S.S.R. played with the world throughout the Cold War.
8. a) President Lyndon B. Johnson attempted to pursue conciliatory policies with the Soviet Union, but the main focus of his time in office was the Vietnam War. He was also committed to the traditional policy of containment, seeking to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia and elsewhere.
b) President John F. Kennedy was warned of the Soviet's growing arsenal of intercontinental ballistic missiles and pledged to revitalize American nuclear forces. And like his two predecessors, Kennedy adopted the policy of containment, which purported to stop the spread of Communism.
Why did Rev. Jesse Jackson call Emmet Till’s murder the big bang of the Civil Rights Movement
Rev. Jesse Jackson called Emmet Till's murder the big bang of the Civil Rights Movement because it was a pivotal moment that brought widespread attention and outrage to the brutal reality of racism and violence in the South.
Till's murder and the subsequent acquittal of his white murderers highlighted the injustices of the Jim Crow era and galvanized civil rights activists and organizations to push for change. It also drew national attention to the efforts of the NAACP and other groups working to combat racial discrimination and segregation.
Till's death served as a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement, inspiring a generation of activists to fight for racial justice and equality.
To know more about Civil Rights Movement , refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/31897973#
#SPJ11
With relevant examples discuss the import
ance of memory for academic excellence
Memory plays a crucial role in achieving academic excellence. It enables us to recall previously learned information and build upon it. For example, in mathematics, students need to remember the formulas and concepts they have learned to solve complex problems.
Similarly, in science, students need to remember the various theories and experiments they have studied to understand the subject better. In language studies, memory helps us recall grammar rules and vocabulary. Moreover, memory aids in exam preparation and retention of information learned.
Therefore, memory is a vital component of academic success, and developing memory techniques and strategies can enhance learning and academic performance.
To know more about memory,refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14789503#
#SPJ11
Tresillo means three notes are spaced evenly across 2 beats. This is a characteristic of
Tres/illo means three notes are spaced evenly across 2 beats. This is a characteristic of rhythmic pattern.
What is the musical significance of Tre/sillo?The tresillo is a rhythmic pattern that consists of three evenly spaced notes played over two beats which is commonly found in -Cuban and Latin American music. It is an essential element of genres including sal/sa, and regg/aet/on.
It is a component of clave rhythm which serves as the foundation for many Latin American musical styles. The pattern's distinctive syncopation gives it a lively and upbeat feel making it a popular choice for dance music.
Full question "Tresillo means three notes are spaced evenly across 2 beats. This is a characteristic of ______"
Read more about Tresillo
brainly.com/question/24456504
#SPJ1
What was the House of Wisdom?
What was the House of Wisdom?
Responses
a hospital where brain surgery was performed
a hospital where brain surgery was performed
a place where Muslim philosophers met to contemplate life
a place where Muslim philosophers met to contemplate life
a research library in Baghdad
a research library in Baghdad
a meeting place for the advisors to the caliphs
The House of Wisdom was C. a research library in Baghdad
What was the House of Wisdom ?In Iraq's Baghdad during the lasting Islamic Golden Age from 9th to 10th century, the House of Wisdom was a centrality that stood out as a beacon of intellectualism.
Created and established by Abbasid Calpih Harun al-Rashid in the 8th Century to help collect, translate, and upkeep both Greek, Persian, and other cultures' knowledge; Housed not only an archive, but also existing as a foundation for research and education where specialists from broad fields like astronomy, mathematics, medicine, logic reasoning, poetry, and more contributed their part in uplifting knowledge combinations toward enlightenment and learning proactively.
Find out more on the House of Wisdom at https://brainly.com/question/3118989
#SPJ1
george fitzhugh argued: group of answer choicesthat slavery was evil and unconstitutional.that colonization societies should solve the slave crisis in the country.that slavery was a necessary evil and should be abolished.that slavery was not a necessary evil but something actually positive and good.
George fitzhugh argued he was a staunch supporter of slavery and cared deeply about the rights of the South. The correct answer is C. that slavery was a necessary evil and should be abolished.
Also, he was a fervent advocate of limited government. He thought that protecting slavery was a good idea because it was a positive institution. George Fitzhugh was a sociologist who specialised in the study of race.
He thought that in order for black people to live decent, civilised lives, they needed the protection of slavery because they were not as mature as white people. From the 1820s until his passing in 1850, John C. Calhoun was the acknowledged intellectual and political leader of the South. He focused much of his impressive intellectual energy on defending slavery.He came up with a two-point strategy. One was a political philosophy that claimed that the federal union required to take specific measures to defend the interests of a minority component, particularly the South. John C. Calhoun was an icon of the Old South and a supporter of states' rights and slavery.
Complete question:
george fitzhugh argued: group of answer
A. choicesthat slavery was evil and unconstitutional.
B. that colonization societies should solve
C. the slave crisis in the country.that slavery was a necessary evil and should be abolished.
D. that slavery was not a necessary evil but something actually positive and good.
To know more about Slavery visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23727411
#SPJ4
write a description of the berlin wall from both perspectives, the west and the soviets.
During the Cold War, the German Democratic Republic constructed the Berlin Wall to stop its citizens from fleeing Soviet-controlled East Berlin and moving to West Berlin, which was governed by the main Western Allies. It created two starkly different areas inside the city of Berlin, both in terms of geography and ideology.
What is the description of the Berlin Wall?
Khrushchev's demands were rejected by Eisenhower, who insisted that their Berlin Agreement remained in effect. The Soviet Union said on November 27 that it had renounced the postwar accords pertaining to the occupation and rule of Germany and West Berlin. Also on Khrushchev's agenda was the liberation of Berlin.
West Berlin was only reachable by land from West Germany due to its location 160 kilometers (100 mi) east and north of the Inner German boundary. It was made up of the 1945-established American, British, and French occupation sectors.
The Berlin Wall's stated goal was to prevent so-called Western "fascists" from entering East Germany and weakening the socialist state, but its main goal was to stop large-scale East-to-West migration.
Learn more about Berlin Wall:
https://brainly.com/question/19520457
#SPJ1
which of the following new deal agencies provided employment specifically for youth during the 1930s? a) works progress administration (wpa) b) public works administration (pwa) c) civilian conservation corps (ccc) d) national recovery administration (nra)
The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was a New Deal agency established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935.
The correct option is A.
It provided employment specifically for youth during the 1930s. The WPA was the largest and most ambitious New Deal agency, employing millions of people, mainly unskilled men, to carry out public works projects including the construction of public buildings and roads, and operated large arts, drama, media, and literacy projects.
The CCC was another New Deal agency that provided employment specifically for youth during the 1930s. It was established in 1933 to provide jobs for young men, ages 17–25, who were unemployed due to the Great Depression. The CCC provided conservation work such as planting trees, controlling floods, and fighting forest fires. The PWA was a New Deal agency established in 1932 to provide large-scale public works projects for the unemployed. It was responsible for the construction of bridges, dams, airports, and other major infrastructure projects. The NRA was a New Deal agency established in 1933 to regulate the labor and industry of the United States and to promote economic recovery and the fair competition of American businesses. It did not provide employment specifically for youth during the 1930s.
To know more about Works Progress Administration, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11134901
#SPJ4
What desegregated the United States Armed Forces?
Answer:
On July 26, 1948, President Harry Truman signed Executive Order 9981, creating the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and Opportunity in the Armed Services. The order mandated the desegregation of the U.S. military.
Explanation:
Which president's response to the iranian crisis was considered a failure, and why?
the response of president
ford
nixon
carter
to the iranian hostage crisis was considered a failure because
five hostages were executed due to his negligence
only a few of the hostages were released while he was in office
he was unable to secure the hostages’ release during his time in office
The president whose response to the Iranian hostage crisis was considered a failure was President Jimmy Carter.
The Iranian hostage crisis began in November 1979 when a group of Iranian militants seized the US embassy in Tehran, taking 52 American hostages. President Carter's administration attempted several diplomatic solutions to secure the hostages' release, including economic sanctions and negotiations, but these efforts were unsuccessful. The failure of the US government to secure the release of the hostages during President Carter's time in office was a significant blow to his presidency.
In addition to the failure to secure the hostages' release, there were several other factors that contributed to the perception of Carter's response as a failure. First, the crisis dragged on for 444 days, which created a sense of frustration and helplessness among the American public. Second, the failed military rescue attempt, known as Operation Eagle Claw, was seen as a humiliating setback for the US military and the Carter administration.
Finally, the hostage crisis was a significant factor in Carter's loss in the 1980 presidential election to Ronald Reagan. Reagan portrayed Carter as a weak and ineffectual leader who was unable to protect American interests abroad. In contrast, Reagan promised a strong and assertive foreign policy that would restore American power and prestige.
In conclusion, President Jimmy Carter's response to the Iranian hostage crisis was considered a failure because he was unable to secure the hostages' release during his time in office. The crisis lasted for over a year, and a failed military rescue attempt contributed to the sense of frustration and helplessness among the American public. The crisis also contributed to Carter's loss in the 1980 presidential election to Ronald Reagan.
To learn more about the Iranian hostage crisis, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12402036
#SPJ11
Select one of these counties (Russia or China) and write a two paragraph essay.
One paragraph will highlight the advantages communism brought to that country and the other paragraph will discuss the disadvantages communism brought to the county.
You must include three examples and supporting details in each paragraph and you must also include a quote from a primary/secondary source
Communism brought both advantages and disadvantages to China. On one hand, it led to significant economic growth, social programs, and improvements in education and healthcare. On the other hand, communism resulted in limited political freedoms, economic inefficiencies and corruption, and negative environmental impacts.
Communism brought several advantages to China.The country experienced significant economic growth under the communist government's policies, with a focus on industrialization and infrastructure. According to a report by the World Bank, "China's GDP grew at an average annual rate of 9.5% from 1979 to 2018, making it the world's fastest-growing major economy." Another advantage of communism in China was the government's ability to implement large-scale social programs, such as the one-child policy. This policy, which was introduced in 1979, aimed to control population growth and improve economic development.
Communism in China also brought several disadvantages. One of the most significant was the government's suppression of political dissent and freedom of speech. According to Human Rights Watch, "the Chinese government continues to censor and punish those who criticize the Communist Party or call for political reforms." China was the government's control over the economy, which led to inefficiencies and corruption. Finally, communism in China has also had negative environmental impacts. According to a report by the World Bank, "China is the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases and is home to some of the most polluted cities in the world."
To know more about Communism, click here
https://brainly.com/question/16165231
#SPJ1