Answer:
Passports. Driving while under the influence of alcohol can lead to legal consequences in the form of a DUI, fines, court-ordered treatment, jail time, job loss and more. One of the greatest hazards of drinking is that one’s intention, such as simply having a good time, can get lost once the intoxicating effects take hold.
Explanation:
i think its A
Neal, a twelve-year-old, buys a pair of skis from Outdoor Outfitters (OO), telling the salesperson that he has never been skiing but “really wants to do it.” The salesperson urges Neal to take a lesson in the sport before attempting a run, but Neal ignores the advice. On the first run, Neal loses control, hits a tree, and is injured. Neal files a suit against OO, alleging that it was negligent to have sold the skis to him, when he was clearly too young and inexperienced.
Issue: How might OO defend itself? Define, explain and decide
Answer:
OO could use the defense that they gave advice but it was rather the action of the boy that caused the accident not the other way around.
Explanation:
The Outdoor Outfitters' defend is that a salesperson warned Neal, a 12-year-old child, that he needed to take a lesson before participating in the run, but the child did not listen to the salesman and was hurt in the run.
What is defend?These advantages simply add to the case for learning self-defense. Of course, there are more substantial benefits than merely increased self-esteem. Training teaches you how to defend yourself and others. Communities will battle to defend themselves.
The case and lawsuit are based on the strict liability tort, which the Outdoor Outfitters salesman failed to perform, despite the fact that there was no fault in the product, but the boy was only 12 years old and had never tried or received proper instruction in this sport of skies, and the saleswoman sold him that product and allowed him to participate in a run.
As a result, the Outdoor Outfitters' defend is that a salesperson warned Neal, a 12-year-old child.
Learn more about on defend, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ2
What are the trial courts of the federal system known as?
1.) U.S. Supreme Courts
2.) U.S. courts of appeals
3.) County court
4.) U.S. district courts
Answer:
What is 4.) U.S. district courts
Explanation:
The nation's 94 district or trial courts are called U.S. District Courts. District courts resolve disputes by determining the facts and applying legal principles to decide who is right. Trial courts include the district judge who tries the case and a jury that decides the case.
Have a happy day! <3 Miss Hawaii
Pick a case where police used deadly force and present the facts to the class. You may want to review the Continuum of Force Pyramid in Part I – De-Escalation: What Happens Before the Use of Force. You may also search for a case using the B.S. in Criminal Justice Library Guide.
State whether you feel that deadly force was justified, and be sure to explain why you feel that way!
This is definitely my question I want to be a officer when I grow up, I'm studying many aspects of it.
there's no specific case in mind but there were these too officers that tried to negotiate in a hostage situation in Dallas Texas and the hostage tooker told the officers to put their gun on the floor as he has another officer hostage, they do it and the officer gets shot in his face and shoots the other officers and they were injured, it was deadly force due to it being a dang hostage situation
Who are the Supreme Court justices appointed by?
The president of the United States
The Federal Judiciary Commission
Congress
Each state has the opportunity to nominate a Supreme Court justice.
Explanation:
option A is correct.
The president of United States.
hope this answer helps you dear..take care
what is the difference between burden of proof and standard of proof?
Answer:
burden of proof is referred to party's duty to present the evidence and the argument to prove the allegations against him or her, as for standard of proof it refers to the degree or the level or the proof demanded to prove a specific type of allegation
State and briefly explain the three competences that are expected from ideal citizen?
Ideally, the provision of the constitution has highlighted some competencies which are expected from citizen and includes:
Respecting and defending human rights: The citizen of the country is expected to give respect to other citizen and defends others rights as well.Contribution to a peaceful living: The citizen are expected to ensure his/her way of lifestyle does contribute peacefully to the society.Participation in democratic processes: The citizen are expected to participate in democratic process like voting for its representative.Learn more about this here
brainly.com/question/20564598
I need Help with This
why is ralsei ralsei
Answer:
because she is
Explanation:
i did not understand the question
please help me guys
In your own idea, what is the importance of police checkpoint? explain
What is honey-bunning?
A. The practice of enticing juvenile residents to do the guardsâ bidding in exchange for sweet pastries.
B. The practice of enticing juvenile residents to follow the rules in exchange for sweet pastries.
C. The practice of enticing juvenile residents to share their thoughts in group therapy in exchange for sweet
pastries.
D. A new dance
The answer is A- The practice of enticing juvenile residents to do the guards bidding in exchange for sweet pastries.
This happened in the Miami-Dade Regional Juvenile Detention Center in 2015 and resulted in the death of 17-year-old Elord Revolte.
What are the functions of political system?
Answer:
To maintain integration of society by determining norms.
To adapt and change elements of social, economic, religious systems necessary for achieving collective (political) goals.
Explanation:
Thats basically it please give brainliest
if lgbtq doesnt allow straights how come on their flag there are straight lines?
Answer:
That is a good question...
Explanation:
holy...
Is restorative justice more effective than adversarial justice?
Restorative justice conferencing and victim-offender mediation programs are included. Findings indicate that restorative programs are a significantly more effective method than more traditional criminal justice responses across all four outcomes. ... and 93% of victims reported satisfaction with the outcome.
Sorce of info: Goo_gle
Since the Texas State School story broke, youth on youth assaults have decreased substantially.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
B, false.
It is false that since the Texas State School story broke, youth on youth assaults have decreased substantially.
I hope this helped at all.Answer:
FALSE IS THE ANSWER
I HOPE IT IS HELPFUL
Bernstein writes that what makes it possible for the guards and staff at juvenile correctional facilities to
facilitate abuse is that they see the inmates as:
A. kids
B. adults
C. products
D. none of these could possibly be the right answer
Some guards and staff view the juvenile inmates as adults. Option B.
Examine 6 regulatory and supervisory role the Bank of Ghana plays in ensuring that there is sanity in the financial sector of Ghana.
Answer:
The several banks in Ghana had collapsed. The banks were given license few years ago. The banks were heavily deficient in liquidity and they had instability in financial systems.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Bank of Ghana ensured that there is organization in the financial sector by ensuring creation of standard monetary policies. These policies ensure banks in the country are well guided as it helps prevent liquidation and other financial issues.
The bank also helps to regulate cash flow within and also from foreign exchange .The regulation of cash flow helps to ensure that the currency is strong when compared to other foreign currencies.
There is also the issue of strict compliance to rules and regulations which is usually applicable to all banks in the region. Those who disobey are usually sanctioned with a fine which is good enough.
The Bank of Ghana helps banks in areas of loans and storing excess that they have.
More information can be gotten from https://brainly.com/question/25139982
Why doesn’t everyone who is socialized in a deviant subcultural setting become criminal?
Answer:Deviance is any behavior that violates social norms, and is usually of sufficient severity to warrant disapproval from the majority of society. Deviance can be criminal or non‐criminal. The sociological discipline that deals with crime (behavior that violates laws) is criminology (also known as criminal justice).
Explanation:i no it
Every person socialized in a deviant subcultural setting doesn't become a criminal, because criminal behavior is different from actually being a criminal.
Who is a criminal?A criminal is a person in the eyes of the law who commits an activity, which is crime as may be specified with a sure guilt in his mind is proven to be a criminal.
The behavior of deviance is referred to as a law-breaking behavior. However, all the deviant behaviors cannot be constituted as crimes, even though all the crimes are deviant in their behaviors.
Hence, it can be stated that a deviant subcultural setting of a person's socialization does not constitute in being a criminal due to the aforementioned reasons.
Learn more about criminal here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ2
Question 5 of 10
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution established which of the
following?
O A. Full rights for all citizens, regardless of color
B. Safety for African Americans from any attacks
O C. The end of slavery in the United States
O D. The right of a president to replace any of his advisors
SUBMIT
A vehicle that is taller Can become more unstable when cornering because it has a higher center of
Answer:
gravity
Explanation:
What is the ethical dilemma that is faced by prosecutors?
Being legally responsible for covering up investigatory errors
Determining the appropriate sentence for serious crimes
Balancing the need to convict criminals with the need to protect constitutional rights
Dealing with the public view that they protect criminals
according to me option C is correct.
hope this answer helps you dear take care...and may u a great day ahead.
Rebecca is serving as Defense Counsel to Mr. Smith, who has been indicted for burglary. During an interview, Mr. Smith told Rebecca that he had perjured himself at his grand jury indictment before consulting with her.
Answer:
r Smith because he was being perjured
How does the "Twinkie defense" apply to the "diminished capacity" element of the insanity defense?
Answer:
A testifying psychiatrist pointed out that White's consumption of sugary foods, such as Twinkies, could lead to diminished capacity.
What are the different types of probation condition violations? Select all that apply.
General
Legal
Technical
Specific
Answer: Common probation violations include: Missing appointment with a probation officer. If you are on supervised probation, you will be required to meet with your probation officer on a regular schedule set by him. If you miss an appointment, this is considered a probation violation, and your probation officer could report this to the court.
Explanation:
The presumptive penalty for a violation of the theft statute is determined by calculating the object's
fair market value minus reasonable depreciation.
T/F
Answer:
Correct answer:
Explanation:
I am kinda sure its True
Hope this helps....
Have a nice day!!!!
Happy Halloween in advance, :D
que es la economia colonial y sus caracterizticas?
Answer:
Elements of pilgrim economy Colonial economy was trade situated (for example creation of money crops, mineral. It was shady in nature, that is Africans were profoundly taken advantage of. It went connected at the hip with estrangement of (Africans were distanced from their territory which was utilized by the Europeans).
Hope this helped! :D
What are the functions of political system?
hope it helps
regulatory and supervisory role of bank of ghana
Answer:
The Bank of Ghana have overall supervisory and regulatory authority in all matters relating to banking and non-banking financial business.
The United States courts of appeals are also known as:
United States circuit courts.
United States federal courts.
Appellate courts of the United States.
United States district courts.
The United States courts of appeals or circuit courts are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal judiciary. ... Appeals from the circuit courts are taken to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Answer:
Your answer would be:
A.) United States circuit courts.
The United States courts of appeals (circuit of courts) differ in their purpose from federal district courts in that courts of appeals function as a system to check the performance of federal district court judges.
Explanation:
Have a great rest of your day
#TheWizzer
Programs providing assistance of counsel to indigent defendants can be divided into which major categories? Select all that apply.
- Pretextual prosecution
- Assigned counsel systems
- Public defender systems
- Missouri Plan
- Contract systems
- Court of last resort
Answer:
Assigned counsel systems
Public Defender systems
The dying cancer patient problem 9.1
The concept of assisted self-killing is controversial. It is legal in some states and illegal in others. Hence, the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.
What is assisted self-killing?Assisted self-killing is a medical practice where a terminally ill patient is provided with the means to end their own life, typically through the administration of medication. It is a controversial and heavily debated topic, with proponents arguing for individual autonomy and compassion, and opponents arguing against intentionally ending human life.
Wilfred's request was related to self-killing. From a legal standpoint, the act of assisting in self-killing is a criminal offense in most states. Therefore, Martha could be subject to criminal charges for her actions. If manslaughter charges were filed against Martha, and I were on the jury, my decision would depend on the specific laws and circumstances of the case, such as the laws related to assisted self-killing in the said state. If the pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician, the situation would be different. In some states, assisted self-killing may be legal under certain circumstances, such as if the patient has a terminal illness and is in unbearable pain. In such cases, physicians may prescribe medication to ease the patient's pain, even if it may shorten their life. Some argue that individuals have the right to end their own lives in cases of terminal illness and unbearable pain, while others argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a human life. Legislators may consider factors such as individual autonomy, protection of vulnerable populations, and the potential impact on medical practice when deciding whether or not to legalize assisted self-killing.
Therefore, the concept of assisted self-killing is controversial and the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.
Learn more about assisted self-killing, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4748133
#SPJ2
The complete question is: Problems 9.1 Law and Justice Problem 9.1 The Case of The Dying Cancer Patient - Wilfred, age 75, has been suffering from cancer for 10 years. The pain associated with the cancer is severe and has become worse over time. Wilfred's doctors say there is no treatment to either slow down the cancer's growth or substantially reduce the pain. Wilfred asks Martha, his wife of 50 years, to relieve him of the terrible pain. He asks her to bring him a bottle of pills that will help him end his own life. Martha cannot stand watching Wilfred suffer anymore and gives him the pills. He swallows them all, slowly fades off to sleep, and dies. 1. Was Wilfred's request related to self-killing? Explain your answer. 2. If you were the district attorney in the state where Martha lives, would you file criminal charges against her? Explain. 3. If manslaughter charges were filed and you were on the jury, would you vote to convict Martha? Give your reasons. If Martha were convicted, what sentence should she receive? Why? 4. If the bottle of pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician instead of by his wife, would your answers have been different? Give your reasons. 5. If you were a state legislator, would you be in favor of or against a law allowing assisted self-killing? Explain why or why not?