Answer: Flooding, loss of habitat, and erosion.
Explanation:
Major physical impacts of a rise in sea level include erosion of beaches, inundation of deltas as well as increased intensity of storm surges, flooding, and damage to coastal areas such as marshes and wetlands. In many cases, this is where large population centers are located, in addition to fragile wildlife habitats.
Why was the medieval times in historical progression of psychology so interesting?
1. Describe the period and its zeitgeist in detail
2. List a philosopher/ psychologist of the time
3. List a philosopher/ psychologist of the time
4. How did this specific period help move psychology forward
Before this time in European history, there was the Middle Ages, also referred to as the Dark Ages, when there was a prevalent conviction that mental illness was caused by demonic possession, witchcraft, and superstition, and when religion predominated in academia.
1. The Renaissance was built on the insights of thinkers like St. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and Roger Bacon regarding the inner workings of the human mind. Greek philosophers like Symeon Seth, a Jew, who lived in the 11th century, and Niketas Stethatos, who lived between 1000 and 1090 CE, explored the nature of dreams and emotions as well as mental illnesses and the brain. The Byzantine Empire perpetuated Greek wisdom in the East.
2. Philosopher or psychologist of that time is Descartes (1596-1650) and Kant (1724-1804).
3. Philosopher or psychologist of that time is Descartes (1596-1650) and Kant (1724-1804).
4. While early philosophers studied and made inferences about human mind and behavior using techniques like observation and logic, modern psychologists use scientific methodology. The ultimate emergence of psychology as a scientific field was also influenced by physiology.
To know more about psychology in mediaeval time:
https://brainly.com/question/24183318
#SPJ4
How were Judeo-Christian and Greco-Roman views similar?
Answer:
hi!
How were Judeo-Christian and Greco-Roman views similar?
they both offered sacrifices
they both established houses for their gods
women were both viewed in the same way relatively
both contributed to the growth of democracy
hope that helps! :))
WHAT IF? What might have happened if Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka had been decided in favor of the Board of Education of Topeka?
If Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka had been decided in favor of the Board of Education of Topeka, then the racial segregation in public schools would have continued for a longer period of time. The Supreme Court's decision to desegregate schools was a landmark ruling that paved the way for the civil rights movement and the end of segregation in many other areas of society.
Before the ruling, many schools in the United States were segregated by race, with black students attending separate schools that were often underfunded and poorly equipped. This led to unequal educational opportunities and limited the life chances of many black Americans.
If Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka had been decided in favor of the Board of Education of Topeka, then the Supreme Court would not have issued a ruling that declared segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional. This would have perpetuated a system of discrimination that denied many black Americans the right to a quality education and perpetuated racial inequality in the United States.
Know more about racial segregation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29768584
#SPJ11
what is philippine independence mean to you? make a reaction about it
Independence Day (Filipino: Araw ng Kasarinlán; also known as Araw ng Kalayaan, "Day of Freedom") is an annual national holiday in the Philippines observed on June 12, commemorating the declaration of Philippine independence from Spain in 1898.
The Civil War ended on April 9, 1865, and the original goal of the North to preserve the Union was accomplished. The task that lay before Lincoln and Congress was to reintegrate the rebellious Southern states into the Union. For many white southerners "Reconstruction was a vicious and destructive experience - a period when vindictive Northerners inflicted humiliation and revenge on a pro-state South."
Were the Black Codes another form of slavery?
Yes, the Black Codes were another form of slavery. These codes were designed to restrict African American freedoms and force them into a new form of slavery.
Yes, the Black Codes were another form of slavery. After the Civil War, southern states passed these laws which restricted African American freedoms and forced them into a new form of slavery. These codes were a series of laws designed to deny African Americans citizenship and enforce labor contracts in Southern states. The codes required African Americans to sign labor contracts with white landowners and limited their rights to own property, testify against whites in court, serve on juries, and even hold certain jobs. Black Codes were a way for Southern states to maintain their economic power and limit the freedom and autonomy of the newly freed slaves.
In conclusion, the Black Codes were a way to re-enslave African Americans through the legal system and keep them from gaining economic power and social status. The implementation of these codes was an attempt to maintain the social, political, and economic hierarchy of the Old South.
To know more about the Black Codes visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14539301
#SPJ11
in this excerpt, what evidence do you see that the heiam court was very wealthy?
Answer: the royal family members were extremely well dressed, which is to be expected, but the guards, grooms, and courtiers were also very finely dressed for the procession. this detail suggests that the heian court was very wealthy.
Answer:
Without the specific excerpt to reference, it is difficult to determine the context of the statement. However, if the statement is accurately reflecting the excerpt, then the evidence that the Heian court was very wealthy is the fact that not only were the royal family members well dressed, but also the guards, grooms, and courtiers who were part of the procession. This level of fine dressing and attention to detail suggests that the Heian court had access to significant amounts of wealth and resources, which were used to support the court and its members in a luxurious lifestyle.
History
1. Who freed the slaves?
2. How did American democracy change in the 1820's?
1. Abraham Lincoln, with the Emancipation Proclamation and the passage of the 13th Amendment, freed the slaves in the United States.
2. American democracy in the 1820s witnessed a shift toward broader suffrage and the expansion of political participation through the removal of property ownership requirements for voting in many states.
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States, played a pivotal role in freeing the slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation, issued in 1862, declared that all slaves in Confederate-held territory were to be set free. Subsequently, the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed in 1865, permanently abolishing slavery throughout the country.
Lincoln's actions were instrumental in bringing about the emancipation of millions of enslaved individuals and marked a significant turning point in American history, leading to the eventual end of slavery in the United States.
In the 1820s, American democracy underwent changes aimed at increasing political inclusivity. Several states eliminated property ownership requirements for voting, allowing a larger segment of the population to participate in elections. This expansion of suffrage aimed to give more citizens a voice in the democratic process, reflecting a growing emphasis on the principles of equality and popular representation.
These changes set the stage for the ongoing evolution of American democracy, as efforts to widen access to political participation continued throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.
Learn more about American democracy: https://brainly.com/question/30489165
#SPJ11
Thinking Like a Historian
In this lesson, you learned about the changes that occurred in and because of France from 1789 to 1815. Three different eras were discussed: The French Revolutionary Era (1789–1799), The Napoleonic Era (1799–1815), and the Bourbon Restoration (after 1815).
Consider this: in many ways, a historian's work is like that of a detective. Historians carefully try to put together the pieces of history by looking at primary and secondary sources. This is similar to the way detectives look at evidence when trying to solve a case. In this assessment, you will have an opportunity to work like a true historian. You will study evidence and develop a logical conclusion based on the sources presented to you.
In this assessment, you will analyze the sources based on the era, and you will also use information you have learned in this lesson to support your responses.
You will be analyzing sources during and after the French Revolutionary Era. You will use the documents to evaluate how the different eras during the late 18th and early 19th centuries shaped the identity and character of the people of France. You will need to answer each analysis question in a short paragraph of complete sentences. Select the template to review the documents. You will first analyze each of them with two separate questions and then you will consider the big picture of the 26 extraordinary years of the French Revolution and Napoleonic Era with a reflection question.
If you would like a fuller treatment of analyzing sources, you can review these three stages of source analysis.
From 1789 to 1815, France underwent significant changes across three distinct eras - the French Revolutionary Era, the Napoleonic Era, and the Bourbon Restoration.
How is this so?While each era had its unique characteristics, they shared common threads.
These included the pursuit of political and social transformation, the emergence of new ideologies such as nationalism and liberalism, the impact of revolutionary wars, the centralization of power under strong leaders, and the tension between revolutionary ideals and the desire for stability.
These interconnected eras shaped the identity and trajectory of France, leaving a lasting legacy on its politics, society, and international relations.
Learn more about French Revolutionary Era at:
https://brainly.com/question/1046744
#SPJ1
One of the main reasons why the French Revolution was successful was because it was able to mobilize a large number of people across the country. The revolution was not just limited to Paris, but spread to many other regions of France as well. The revolutionaries were able to create a powerful sense of national unity, which helped to gather support for their cause. This unity was achieved through a variety of means, including the use of propaganda, the creation of new symbols and rituals, and the establishment of new political institutions.
The French Revolution's success can be attributed to its ability to mobilize a large number of people across the country, creating a powerful sense of national unity through propaganda, symbols, rituals, and political institutions.
The French Revolution, which took place from 1789 to 1799, was a period of radical political and social upheaval in France. One of the key factors contributing to its success was the revolutionaries' ability to mobilize people from various regions of the country. The revolution was not confined to Paris; it spread to different parts of France, involving a significant portion of the population. This widespread mobilization allowed the revolutionaries to garner support and resources from various regions, strengthening their cause.
To achieve this mobilization, the revolutionaries employed several strategies. They utilized propaganda extensively, disseminating ideas and revolutionary principles through newspapers, pamphlets, and public speeches. This helped in shaping public opinion and rallying people around the revolutionary cause. Additionally, the revolutionaries created new symbols and rituals that instilled a sense of national identity and unity among the population. The tricolor flag, the national anthem "La Marseillaise," and revolutionary festivals became powerful tools for fostering a collective spirit and rallying the masses.
Furthermore, the establishment of new political institutions played a crucial role in uniting the nation. The National Assembly, later replaced by the National Convention, provided a platform for representatives from different regions to come together and participate in the decision-making process. This inclusivity helped in forging a sense of shared purpose and common goals among the revolutionaries.
Overall, the success of the French Revolution can be attributed to its ability to mobilize people from across France, creating a strong sense of national unity. Through the use of propaganda, symbols, rituals, and inclusive political institutions, the revolutionaries were able to rally support and sustain the revolutionary fervor that ultimately led to significant political and social transformations in France.
Learn more about French Revolution here:
brainly.com/question/9053584
#SPJ11
Causes of the Cold War in bullet points
Do you think Marx’s proposed solutions to capitalism’s ills, such as the abolition of private property, are effective? Why or why not?
Marx's proposed solutions to capitalism's ills, including the abolition of private property, are a subject of debate. The effectiveness of these solutions depends on various factors and perspectives.
Marx's proposed solutions to capitalism, such as the abolition of private property, are viewed differently by different individuals and scholars. While some argue that these solutions are effective in addressing the inequalities and exploitation inherent in capitalism, others question their feasibility and potential consequences.
Marx believed that private ownership of the means of production led to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, creating a class struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He advocated for the collective ownership and control of resources to create a more equitable society.
Critics of Marx's proposals argue that the abolition of private property may lead to inefficiencies, lack of motivation for innovation, and the erosion of individual freedoms. They argue that private property rights incentivize investment, entrepreneurship, and economic growth.
Furthermore, historical attempts to implement Marx's ideas, such as in Soviet-style socialist systems, have faced challenges and often resulted in authoritarian regimes and economic stagnation. These experiences raise concerns about the practicality and viability of Marx's proposed solutions.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of Marx's proposed solutions depends on the specific context, the extent to which they are implemented, and how they are balanced with other societal values. It is a complex and ongoing debate that requires careful consideration of economic, social, and political factors.
Learn more about Marx's proposed solutions here:
brainly.com/question/13743331
#SPJ11
What did Churchill mean by the "Iron Curtain"?
A: The cultural divide between the United States and Europe
B: The political divide between the Northern and Southern hemispheres
C: The political divide between Western and Eastern Europe
D: The cultural divide between North America and Asia
Answer:The political divide between Western and Eastern Europe
Explanation:
How did the US acquire the Philippines and Hawaii?
Answer:
Hawaii was annexed
The Philippines was acquired during the Treaty of Paris
Explanation:
Hawaii:
The United States annexed Hawaii in 1898. Before that, Hawaii was an independent nation ruled by a monarchy. However, American interests, particularly in sugar production and strategic military positioning, led to increased influence and control over the Hawaiian islands. In 1893, a group of American businessmen and sugar planters, supported by the U.S. military, overthrew the Hawaiian monarchy in what is known as the "Overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii." Following the overthrow, the U.S. government pursued annexation, and in 1898, Hawaii officially became a U.S. territory.
Philippines:
The United States acquired the Philippines as a result of the Spanish-American War, which took place in 1898. At that time, the Philippines was a colony of Spain. During the war, the U.S. Navy under Commodore George Dewey defeated the Spanish fleet in the Battle of Manila Bay, leading to the occupation of Manila. With the defeat of Spain, the Treaty of Paris was signed in December 1898, which ended the war and ceded several Spanish territories to the United States, including the Philippines. However, the transfer of sovereignty from Spain to the United States sparked a Philippine independence movement led by Emilio Aguinaldo. The ensuing Philippine-American War lasted from 1899 to 1902, with the United States eventually suppressing the insurgency and establishing colonial rule over the Philippines. The Philippines remained a U.S. territory until July 4, 1946, when it gained independence and became the Republic of the Philippines.
While Hawaii was annexed by the United States in 1898, the Philippines were acquired by the United States as a result of the Spanish-American War.
The Spanish-American War of 1898 ended with the Philippines being given to the United States. The Treaty of Paris, which was ratified on December 10, 1898, put an end to the conflict and required Spain to hand over control of the Philippines to the United States in exchange for a payment of $20 million.
In 1898, Hawaii was annexed by the United States. A group of plantation owners and merchants from Hawaii staged a coup against Queen Liliuokalani in 1893 and installed a new government. They immediately requested annexation by the US, but President Grover Cleveland denied them.
As a result, the significance of the US acquire the Philippines and Hawaii are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on the Philippines, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30377346
#SPJ6
Europeans who ruled territories directly denied the influence of Indigenous people because
Answer:
Europeans who ruled territories directly often denied the influence of Indigenous people due to a combination of factors. One significant factor was the Eurocentric worldview prevalent among European colonizers. This worldview placed European culture, values, and systems of governance at the pinnacle of human achievement. Consequently, Indigenous cultures were often viewed as primitive, inferior, or backward in comparison. This perspective led to a dismissal or devaluation of Indigenous contributions and a denial of their influence on the territories being colonized. By denying Indigenous influence, Europeans sought to establish their own cultural and political dominance, reinforcing the belief in the superiority of European civilization. This Eurocentric worldview served as a justification for the colonization process, allowing European powers to assert control over the territories while disregarding the rich histories, knowledge systems, and accomplishments of Indigenous peoples.
Explanation:
Europeans, differing in perspectives mainly on land ownership and power hierarchies, denied indigenous influences through direct rule, disrupting indigenous societies and depleting their resources. In the pursuit of wealth and resources, violent responses and oppressive policies against resistances followed, dismantling indigenous cultures globally.
Explanation:Europeans who ruled territories directly denied the influence of Indigenous people primarily due to cultural differences, particularly in relation to land ownership, power hierarchies, and economic motivations. Europeans' concept of private property sharply contrasted with native peoples' understanding of communal land use, leading to the colonizers claiming areas as their own. This notion, combined with Europeans' superiority in weaponry and insatiable drive for wealth and resources, gave Europeans an advantage over indigenous societies.
In direct rule systems, Europe often disrupted existing power structures and removed Indigenous elites who resisted cooperation. This further widened cultural gaps and led to internal conflicts within indigenous communities while exacerbating the suppression of native traditions. More so, colonial projects carried out by the Europeans significantly depleted local environments depriving Indigenous people of their natural resources triggering violent treatments against those that resisted.
Decades of such subjugation and imposition of European belief systems dismantled indigenous cultures globally, subsequently leading to the political, economic, and social marginalization of these groups.
Learn more about Indigenous societies and European colonization here:https://brainly.com/question/28774097
#SPJ11
What is it called when an artist tries to fool the viewer into thinking what they are seeing is real and not merely a representational illusion?
The term used when an artist tries to fool the viewer into thinking what they are seeing is real and not merely a representational illusion is "trompe l'oeil".
The term is from French meaning "deceive the eye."Trompe l'oeil is a visual technique used in painting in which the artist uses photorealistic details to create a realistic image. This can include 3D objects, shadows, and other techniques to make the painting appear as if it is three-dimensional or real. The technique is often used to create optical illusions or to fool the viewer into thinking they are seeing something that is not there in reality.
In summary, "trompe l'oeil" is the term used when an artist tries to fool the viewer into thinking what they are seeing is real and not merely a representational illusion.
To know more about visual technique visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24264452
#SPJ11
What is one factor that influences business decisions in a market economy? Responses The desire of the government to produce certain products The desire of the government to produce certain products A lack of competition between business and selling the same product A lack of competition between business and selling the same product The freedom consumers have to buy what they choose The freedom consumers have to buy what they choose The need for workers to be happy in their jobs
What do you think about "The English Industrial Revolution was
not just one, but a group of three interrelated? revolutions."
I think that the idea that the English Industrial Revolution was not just a single, isolated event, but rather a group of interrelated revolutions is a widely accepted concept among historians. The term "Industrial Revolution" typically refers to the period of rapid industrialization and technological advancements that occurred in England during the late 18th and early 19th centuries, but this process was not a single, homogeneous event. Instead, it was characterized by a series of interrelated revolutions that occurred in different sectors of the economy and society, including the textile industry, transportation, and agriculture.
The first industrial revolution, which began in the mid-18th century, was marked by innovations in the textile industry, including the development of new spinning machines and power looms. The second industrial revolution, which began in the mid-19th century, was characterized by advances in transportation and communication technology, such as the steam engine and the telegraph. The third industrial revolution, which began in the mid-20th century, was marked by the development of new technologies such as computers, the internet, and automation.
Therefore, it can be argued that the English Industrial Revolution was not a single, isolated event, but rather a series of interrelated revolutions that occurred over several centuries.
In 1876, the Sioux defeated General Custer at Little Bighorn. The New York Times ran a story under this headline: THE LITTLE HORN MASSACRE NY Times What does the choice of the word “massacre” imply about this conflict? Check all that you think apply. Most of Custer’s men were killed. The Sioux killed Custer’s men in a dishonorable fashion. The Sioux were the enemy. The newspaper was biased in its coverage.
Answer:
The word "massacre" in the title "THE LITTLE HORN MASSACRE" suggests the following: Custer's soldiers were mostly killed, Custer's troops were brutally murdered by the Sioux., the adversary were the Sioux, the newspaper's coverage was slanted
Explanation:
To summarize the implications of the word "massacre" in the headline
The term suggests a large number of casualties, indicating that most of Custer's men were killed.
It implies that the Sioux killed Custer's men in a dishonorable or unfair fashion.
The word positions the Sioux as the enemy responsible for the killings.
The use of "massacre" in the headline suggests a biased perspective in favor of General Custer and his troops, potentially portraying the Sioux as aggressors.
Learn more about New York Times from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/8645301
In Act lll Romeo and Juliet, why is Romeo considered the protagonist?
Answer:
because he has a conflict to overcome.
Explanation:
please mark me brainloest i need one :(
Explain the significance of
• slavery • slave codes
• middle passage • racism
Slavery refers to the owning of another person who is considered property and not a human being. It was a legal institution in many countries for many years. The significance of slavery is that it brought a lot of economic benefits to the slave owners in different parts of the world.
Slave codes, on the other hand, were laws put in place to control and regulate the behavior of slaves in the colonies. They aimed to keep slaves under strict control to prevent them from revolting. The codes specified the behavior expected of slaves and the punishments that awaited them if they did not behave in a certain way.
In conclusion, slavery, slave codes, the middle passage, and racism are all significant historical events that have shaped the world as we know it today. These events have had a profound impact on society and continue to be relevant today.
To know more about Slavery visit:
https://brainly.com/question/866336
#SPJ11
What is another name for the "doctrine of nullification?"
A Secession doctrine
B States' rights doctrine
C Doctrine of 1824
Answer:
Explanation:
States' rights doctorine
Make Inferences Why is it important that the commander in chief of the armed forces of the United States be a civilian (the president) rather than a military commander?
It is important that the commander in chief of the armed forces of the United States be a civilian (the president) rather than a military commander to maintain the principle of civilian control over the military.
The United States has a long-standing principle of civilian control over the military, which means that the President, as the head of the executive branch of the government, is responsible for the ultimate decision-making authority of the military. This principle is essential for ensuring that the military serves the national interest rather than pursuing its own interests. The idea of civilian control over the military is rooted in the US Constitution, which grants the President the title of commander in chief of the armed forces, while at the same time placing the military under the ultimate control of civilian authority.
This principle serves as a safeguard against military dictatorship and helps to ensure that military power is used only in the service of the public interest. The President's role as commander in chief of the armed forces ensures that the military remains subservient to the elected civilian government. It means that the military does not have the power to dictate foreign or military policy, which is reserved for the civilian leadership. In addition, civilian control over the military helps to ensure that the military remains accountable to the public and that military power is used in the service of the nation's strategic interests.
Know more about military, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32086906
#SPJ11
Find a partner and interview each other about the organizations you researched.
Partner Interviews on Researched Organizations For the purpose of this question, I will be interviewing my partner on the organization that they researched.
My partner researched a non-profit organization called Feeding America.Feeding America is the largest hunger relief organization in the United States. They provide assistance to individuals and families that are struggling with hunger and food insecurity. They operate through a network of food banks, meal programs, and shelters.
Feeding America’s mission is to end hunger in the United States. They believe that everyone in America should have access to nutritious food. Their goal is to make sure that no one goes hungry in America.Feeding America carries out its mission by partnering with various organizations to provide food and resources to communities in need.
To know more about Organizations visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13278945
#SPJ11
Please write 7 paragraphs on the following 2 texts and use the outline I created to help discuss the 2 texts.
WEB DuBois’s "Close Ranks" Article in Crisis (1918)
and
Soviet Union, The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (1938)
Introductory paragraph
Thesis and brief layout
First Body Paragraph (Main Idea)
Main Idea of Du Bois document
Main Idea of Soviet Union document
Second Body Paragraph (Speaker and Audience)
Speaker and Audience for Du Bois document
Speaker and Audience for Soviet Union document
Third Body Paragraph (Reflection of Society)
How the Du Bois document reflects its society
How the Soviet Union document reflects its society
Fourth Body Paragraph (Gender)
What does the Du Bois document reveal about gender
What does the Soviet Union document reveal about gender
Fifth Body Paragraph (Criticisms)
Criticisms of Du Bois document
Criticisms of Soviet Union document
Concluding Paragraph
Summary of major points
Any additional insights
The items under reasoning are WEB Du Bois's "Close Ranks" item written in Crisis in 1918 and the "History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union" document from 1938.
What is the Soviet Union?These texts determine valuable visions into their particular opportunity periods and clear up the dominant friendly, governmental, and theoretical frameworks.
The basic aim concerning this essay search out resolve WEB Du Bois's "Close Ranks" item and the "History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union" document, fixating on differing facets to a degree the main plans, talker and hearing,etc.
By checking these materials, we can gain understandings into the public and governmental climates of moment of truth and accept the fuller classical importance of the texts.
Learn more about Soviet Union, from
https://brainly.com/question/1310325
#SPJ1
a) The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (HKIE) joined the Washington Accord in 1995. What is(are) the difference(s) between Washington Accord and Sydney Accord (HKIE was verified by the Sydney Accord as a full signatory in 2003) regarding Hong Kong situation? b) What is the purpose of the principles of Good Practice for Washington Accord Signatories working internationally? c) According to the development of the Greater Bay Area, give your opinions on any challenges of the role of Hong Kong in legal and economic dimension.
a) The difference between the Washington Accord and the Sydney Accord is that the Washington Accord primarily focuses on the accreditation of undergraduate engineering degree programs, while the Sydney Accord focuses on the accreditation of engineering technology programs.
b) The purpose of the principles of Good Practice for Washington Accord Signatories working internationally is to ensure that accredited engineering programs maintain high standards, promote quality education, and foster international collaboration and cooperation.
c) The role of Hong Kong in the legal and economic dimension of the Greater Bay Area faces challenges such as harmonizing legal systems, ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights, and navigating potential conflicts between Hong Kong's common law system and the mainland China's civil law system.
The Washington Accord is an international agreement among engineering accrediting bodies that recognizes the substantial equivalence of undergraduate engineering degree programs. It facilitates the mobility and recognition of engineering professionals across member countries. On the other hand, the Sydney Accord specifically addresses the accreditation of engineering technology programs, which emphasize the application of engineering principles in practical and technical roles.
The principles of Good Practice provide guidelines and expectations for engineering programs that have been accredited by the Washington Accord. These principles help ensure that accredited programs continue to meet the established quality standards and that graduates are equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to work effectively in an international context.
The development of the Greater Bay Area, which aims to integrate Hong Kong, Macau, and several mainland Chinese cities into an innovation-driven economic hub, requires addressing legal and economic complexities. The challenge lies in reconciling the different legal frameworks and ensuring a smooth transition while preserving Hong Kong's legal autonomy and protecting the rights and interests of businesses and individuals operating in the region.
Learn more about Washington: https://brainly.com/question/26215904
#SPJ11
Q: Ashraf is a poor laborer in a factory. His salary is too low to fulfill his basic needs and daily life requirements. He always remains busy in earning his livings and finds no time to think about his own desires, wishes and aspirations. He never contemplates that how to satisfy his spiritual needs. Keeping in view the abovementioned scenario; answer the following questions with reference to Abraham Maslow's need-hierarchy theory. a) Identify and paraphrase your answer with appropriate reasons at which need Ashraf is fixated? (01 Marks) b) Give examples of your daily life according to Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory, and describe how you satisfy those needs. (03 Marks)
Ashraf is preoccupied with physical requirements. It is said that Ashraf works as a poor factory worker for a low wage, making it difficult for him to meet his basic needs and the necessities of daily life.
As a result, he is unable to even contemplate saving money. He doesn't have time to think about his goals for his life, dreams, or higher needs, like spirituality.
b) Experts are not permitted to respond to such questions because this portion of the question is based on your own life. To assist you in answering this part, a brief explanation of Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs is provided below.
It is a pyramidal representation of the various human needs that a person has throughout their life. The needs are broken down into five distinct stages: physiological, safety, love/belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. It is necessary to meet the lower needs before moving on to the higher ones. Take a look at your own day-to-day activities to see what needs you actually have and how you meet them.
Learn more about Maslow's hierarchy theory:
brainly.com/question/29774245
#SPJ4
What lessons and realities do you picture about the tragic death of the GOMBURZA to what is happening in the Philippines nowadays?
The tragic death of Gomburza still haunts the Philippines, and it serves as a significant lesson for the people. The Philippines experienced an increase in nationalism during this period, leading to a series of anti-Spanish movements.
The execution of GOMBURZA was an essential historical event in the Philippines. Gomburza was a term used to describe three Filipino priests who were executed by the Spanish authorities for their alleged involvement in the 1872 Cavite mutiny.
What lessons and realities do you picture about the tragic death of the GOMBURZA to what is happening in the Philippines nowadays?The tragic death of Gomburza still haunts the Philippines, and it serves as a significant lesson for the people. The Philippines experienced an increase in nationalism during this period, leading to a series of anti-Spanish movements.
The incident demonstrated how Filipinos could be subjected to injustice and repression by colonial powers. As a result, the event served as a catalyst for the Philippine Revolution, which resulted in independence.
The death of Gomburza reminds Filipinos of the value of liberty, justice, and democracy. The Philippine people fought for the freedom of expression and the right to practice their faith without fear of persecution. Even though it was a painful lesson, it aided in the growth of the Philippines' democracy, giving them the right to vote, speak, and have a say in their country's governance.
In conclusion, the tragic death of Gomburza serves as a lesson for the Philippines, reminding them of the importance of justice, freedom, and democracy. The Philippines gained independence and fought for democracy. Despite the challenges, the country continues to grow and progress towards a better future.
Read more about Nationalism at https://brainly.com/question/1018147
#SPJ11
Analyze Why do you think some of the trails run along rivers?
There are several reasons why some of the trails run along rivers. Rivers and streams are essential sources of water for plants and animals alike, making them natural habitats that can attract wildlife.
In addition, because rivers cut through the landscape, they can provide natural corridors through which trails can be routed. This makes it easier to build trails that are relatively level and easy to navigate, especially in areas with steep terrain.
Furthermore, trails that run along rivers are often located in areas that are relatively flat and easily accessible, which can make them ideal for beginners or families with young children. Finally, because rivers often follow the contours of the land, they can provide natural landmarks that can help hikers navigate and stay on the trail. This can be especially important in areas where the terrain is rugged and the trails are not well-marked.
In conclusion, the decision to run trails along rivers is a practical one, as it makes it easier to build trails and navigate through difficult terrain. Additionally, rivers and streams are often located in areas that are rich in natural beauty, which can make them popular destinations for outdoor enthusiasts.
To know more about natural visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30406208
#SPJ11
As a result of the French and Indian War, the resulting treaty enabled Britain to ____
A. forever resolve the conflict over its North American territories. B. annex French lands east of the Mississippi River, French Canada, Spanish Florida, and parts of the Caribbean C. give up the entire Louisiana Territory to the Iroquois Nation. D. gain control of Guam. Cuba, and the Philippines.
As a result of the French and Indian War, the resulting treaty enabled Britain to annex French lands east of the Mississippi River, French Canada, Spanish Florida, and parts of the Caribbean.
The correct option is B. What was the French and Indian War? The French and Indian War was a conflict between the French and the British on American soil. It lasted from 1754 to 1763 and was fought over control of the land, particularly along the Ohio River valley.
The war was part of a larger struggle between the British and French empires for global dominance, but it was the American colonies that saw the most fighting. What were the effects of the French and Indian War? The French and Indian War had profound implications for both the British Empire and the American colonists.
After the war, Britain emerged as the world's greatest colonial power, with a vast new empire in North America and India. The war also played a role in the worsening relations between Britain and its American colonies, which would eventually lead to the American Revolution. A peace treaty, called the Treaty of Paris, was signed in 1763 and ended the war.
To know more about American Revolution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1799447
#SPJ11
How did Native Americans react to colonial growth?
Answer:
Native Americans in Colonial America
Native Americans resisted the efforts of the Europeans to gain more land and control during the colonial period, but they struggled to do so against a sea of problems, including new diseases, the slave trade, and an ever-growing European population.
While Native Americans and English settlers in the New England territories first attempted a mutual relationship based on trade and a shared dedication to spirituality, soon disease and other conflicts led to a deteriorated relationship and, eventually, the First Indian War.
One of America's earliest and most enduring legends is the story of Thanksgiving: that Pilgrims who had migrated to the new Plymouth Colony from England sat down with the local Wampanoag Indians to celebrate the first successful harvest in 1621. It makes for a great story—cultures coming together and sharing the bounty of the land that would eventually become America. However, the reality of interactions between colonists and the local Native American peoples is a far more complex story of trade, cooperation, and intense conflict as the two societies merged into America.
Finding Common Ground
In the 1600s, when the first English settlers began to arrive in New England, there were about 60,000 Native Americans living in what would later become the New England colonies (Plymouth, Massachusetts Bay, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New Haven, and Rhode Island). In the first English colonies in the Northeast (as well as in Virginia), there were initial conflicts and concerns over the threat colonists posed to the Native Americans’ long-established territory. Still, colonists were able to build thriving colonies with the help of locals.
Trade was one of the first bridges between New England colonists and local Native American populations. For the colonists, it was about building the infrastructure and relationships they would need to stay and thrive in the New World. For the Native Americans, it was often about building potential alliances. After only five years, the Plymouth Colony was no longer financially dependent on England due to the roots and local economy it had built alongside the native Massachusetts peoples.
Both sides benefited from the trade and bartering system established by the native peoples and the colonists. The Native Americans provided skins, hides, food, knowledge, and other crucial materials and supplies, while the settlers traded beads and other types of currency (also known as “wampum”) in exchange for these goods.
Ideas were traded alongside physical goods, with wampum sometimes carrying religious significance as well. The first Bible printed in the New World was actually a translation into the language of the Native American people of the Algonquin, suggesting that the dialogues between the colonists and Native Americans were not just political or practical in nature, but also spiritual.
The primary religion of the New England colonies was the strict Puritan Christianity originally brought to the Massachusetts Bay colony by ships like the Mayflower, but as the colonies grew and changed, some of the colonists began to move away from that base. So too did views on the Native Americans who shared their land. A famous example of this is Roger Williams, whose rebellion against the religious powers-that-be led him to create the colony of Rhode Island. Williams held the unorthodox view that the colonists had no right to occupy land without purchasing it from the Native American peoples living there.
Over time, however, relations between the now-established colonies and the local peoples deteriorated. Some of the problems were unintentionally introduced by the colonists, like smallpox and other diseases that the English settlers had unwittingly brought over on their ships. Although the colonists suffered diseases of their own early on, they were largely immune to the microbes they brought over to the New World. The local Native American populations, however, had no such immunity to diseases like smallpox, tuberculosis, measles, cholera, and the bubonic plague.
Some colonial leaders, such as the Puritan minister Increase Mather, believed that the illness and decimation of the New England Native Americans was an act of God to support the colonists’ right to the land: “[A]bout this time [1631] the Indians began to be quarrelsome touching the Bounds of the Land which they had sold to the English, but God ended the Controversy by sending the Smallpox amongst the Indians.” Some colonial governments used the devastation as a way to convert the natives to Christianity, making them into “praying Indians” and moving them to “praying towns,” or reservations.