Answer:
True
Explanation:
To the best of my knowledge the statement is true. The emperor was an absolute ruler and had power over the army, the church, and the government. Specifically, the emperor was commander-in-chief of the army and was the absolute leader of the church and the government.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The assertion is correct to the best of my knowledge. The emperor ruled with unlimited authority, commanding the army, the church, and the government. The emperor was the absolute ruler of the church and government, as well as the commander-in-chief of the army.
That a school or schools shall be established by the Legislature, for the convenient instruction of youth, with such salaries to the masters, paid by the public, as may enable them to instruct at low prices; and all useful learning shall be duly encouraged, and promoted, in one or more universities.
–Constitution of North Carolina, Article 41, December 18, 1776
How well did the legislature comply with this requirement in the constitution?
The legislature failed to support public schools or universities.
The legislature supported schools for young students but failed to support universities.
The legislature supported a university but failed to support schools for young students.
The legislature supported both public schools and universities across the state.
Answer:
by creating private elementary schools
by determining costs based on family income
Explanation:
Answer:
A,A
Explanation:
What would an effective conclusion need to include?
Answer: An effective conclusion should include restating the claim, or question. You should also summaries your writing into one sentence, answering the question.
Example:
In conclusion, the uprising of people in Florida due to the ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill has been a needed challenge in the USA as of right now. The bill should be challenged as of right now due to the rights the LGBT community do not have, such as being turned down a job because of their gender.
*please note that the example above does not represent my political views, I just needed an example claim/question for the example conclusion, thanks!*
Match each event to the civilization in which it occurred.
Answer:
Babylonian civilization --> They took over the sumerian civilization
Assyrian civilization --> Conflict between the king and his brother could be the cause for its downfall
Hittite civilization --> Historians know very little about this civilization
Hope this helped :)
whoever answers will get brainlest! please help;
Write a two paragraph response using evidence that addresses the following prompt: "How has the American Declaration of Independence impacted other countries around the world? How have the PROMISES of equality found in the Declaration of Independence been extended/given to more groups of people in AMERICA over the last few hundred years?"
sources;
https://www.monticello.org/declaration/
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.asp
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7249677.stm#:~:text=We%2C%20the%20democratically%20elected%20leaders,an%20independent%20and%20sovereign%20state.&text=We%20shall%20protect%20and%20promote,political%20and%20decision%2Dmaking%20processes.
please comment real answer. if u dont know it dont answer. thank you
Answer:
Check under Task 3. From the information found there you can make an easy 2 paragraphs
Explanation:
https://www.mrdalesandro.com/the-path-to-democracy.html
The table below lists sources of law.
Sources of Law
Statutes and Acts
Ordinance
?
Which phrase completes the table?
Criminal law
Case law
Military law
Juvenile law
Answer:
statutes and acts
juvenile law
Please help!!! I will give brainly! I really need it.
How was the religion of the Sumerians different from the religion of the Israelites (Hebrews)? Make sure to include key beliefs from both groups. Your answer should be about a paragraph (5 sentences) in length, including a topic sentence, detailed sentences, and a conclusion.
A good answer would include some of the following terms with explanation:
Polytheism, monotheism, Judaism (Jewish), Israelites (Hebrews), Sumerians, Torah
The Hebrews were monotheists who believed in only one god, while the Sumerians and Egyptians believed in many gods (they were polytheists).
English Catholics were unhappy under:
the English king
the English king
Lord Baltimore
Lord Baltimore
Queen Mary
Queen Mary
The English King is your answer
Lord Baltimore admired and created a safe place for catholics and Mary hated Protestants not catholics...therefore your answer is the English king
Hope this helped you- have a good day bro cya)
Which Whig Party leader was elected governor of North Carolina?
Archibald Murphey
Edwin Holt
John Motley Morehead
Conrad Reed
Answer:
my GUESS is John Motley Morehead
Explanation:
John Motley Morehead was an American lawyer and politician who became the 29th Governor of the U.S. state of North Carolina. He became known as "the Father of Modern North Carolina"
The family moved to Rockingham County, North Carolina when John Motley was two years old.
His advocacy of this cause made him a leader in the NORTH CAROLINA WHIG PARTY, which strongly supported internal improvements as one of its fundamental tenets.
Terribly sorry if im wrong ~(>_<。)
Answer:
John Moltley Morehead
Explanation:
i got it right so should you
how do you think Champion felt when the soldiers stopped her?
He did not seem to think much of his first experience “seeing the elephant” at soldiers offering last words home to comfort and reassure their families.
Is it this becuase i'm learning something like this.
Which pair of Old Testament and New Testament verses is regarding the solid rock? Isaiah 9:6 and Acts 3:15 Isaiah 32:1-2 and Matthew 5:6 2 Samuel 22:2-3 and Matthew 16:18 Psalm 24: 7 and Matthew 27:11, 37
Answer:
Samuel 22:2-3 and Matthew 16:18
Since you got the answer already can I get brainliest, please?
Which statements accurately describe China after World War II ?
Choose all answers that are correct.
The Cultural Revolution under Mao in the 1960s oppressed students and professionals.
Since 1976, China has had a mixture of a market economy and a communist economy.
After Mao's death, Chinese leaders began to open the country more to the west.
Mao’s Great Leap Forward plan to increase industry was a great success.
That a school or schools shall be established by the Legislature, for the convenient instruction of youth, with such salaries to the masters, paid by the public, as may enable them to instruct at low prices; and all useful learning shall be duly encouraged, and promoted, in one or more universities.
–Constitution of North Carolina, Article 41, December 18, 1776
The main idea of this passage is that the state needs to improve
.
According to the text, the money needed to fix this problem should come from
.
Answer:public and taxpayers is awnser
Explanation:
in comments
Answer:
the guy above me is right∞
Explanation:
In 1828 J. Humphrey Bissell, of Charleston, bought part of the McComb Mine and brought with him not only new technology but also “men experienced in South American mining.” At one Charlotte mine that employed almost a thousand workers, thirteen different languages were spoken. Count Vincent de Rivafinoli, an Italian aristocrat and experienced mining engineer, was one of the most cultured and flamboyant foreigners in Charlotte. As head of the Mecklenburg Gold Mining Company, he brought in as many as eighty expert miners from England, Germany, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Switzerland, Italy, and France.
–“The North Carolina Gold Rush,”
Rebecca Lewis
Which statement best summarizes the main idea of this passage?
Mining benefited some parts of the state, but Charlotte was not one of them.
Mining helped Charlotte grow in terms of population, technology, and industry.
Almost all gold mines were small and employed only a handful of workers.
Most gold mines were owned by Americans, and few immigrants took part in mining.
Answer:
B) Mining helped Charlotte grow in terms of population, technology, and industry.
Explanation:
Hope i helped!
Answer: B- Mining helped Charlotte grow in terms of population, technology, and industry.
Explanation:
correct on edge 2022
We live in a world in which all children receive an education. What was the educational system for white and African-American children in Mississippi before 1860 and why was it that way
Answer:
Only white children were educated.
Explanation:
This practice was to preserve white supremacy.
PLS HELP Colonial America was a multicultural society of people from many different ethnic backgrounds, including American Indians, Africans, and Europeans of many nationalities. How did the colonists deal with these differences? How were different groups treated? What kind of ideas do you think help different groups get along? What kind of ideas may hurt them? (I WILL GIVE YOU A THANK AND BRAINIEST DO NOT COPY OTHER PEOPLES WORK!!!!)
Answer: I think the American Indians, Africans, and Europeans were treated badly because of their race. They dealt with these differences by having a war to settle the differences they had between each other. It would've been good if they had gotten along because the Indians had many good ideas, but they didn't get along because they had different ideas and argued.
Explanation:
Answer:
Society and culture in colonial America varied widely among ethnic and social groups, and from colony to colony, but was mostly centered around agriculture as it was the primary venture in most regions. While New England had small family farms, the southern colonies had large plantations that required slave labor. Religion also played a major role in shaping some local cultures; many people who colonized North America were fleeing religious persecution in their home country and implemented strict religious-based rules in the colonies where they settled.
Colonists dealt with African's and American Indians really badly. Africans in colonial America held very little social or political power, their contributions not only supported the Southern colonies but led to their eventual prosperity. However, the Africans' status in the United States slowly deteriorated over the course of the century, as colonies slowly added laws to permit slavery and restrict the rights of Africans. While slavery existed in every colony at one time or another, it was the economic structure of farming in the South that depended on slave labor to prosper. As enslaved people became more and more in demand in the South, the slave trade that spanned from Africa to the colonies became a source of economic wealth as well. Working long hours, living in crude conditions, and suffering abuses from their owners, African captives faced harsh conditions in colonial America. None of the colonies outlawed slavery prior to the Revolutionary War.
During the colonial period, Native Americans had a complicated relationship with European settlers. They resisted the efforts of the Europeans to gain more of their land and control through both warfare and diplomacy. But problems arose for the Native Americans, which held them back from their goal, including new diseases, the slave trade, and the ever-growing European population in North America. as European nations scrambled to claim the already occupied land in the “New World,” some leaders formed alliances with Native American nations to fight foreign powers. Some famous alliances were formed during the French and Indian War of 1754–1763. Native Americans were also vulnerable during the colonial era because they had never been exposed to European diseases, like smallpox, so they didn’t have any immunity to the disease, as some Europeans did. The illnesses decimated the Native Americans—by some estimates killing as much as 90 percent of their population. With the population sick and decreasing, it became more and more difficult to mount an opposition to European expansion. Another aspect of the colonial era that made the Native Americans vulnerable was the slave trade. Native Americans allied with the losing side were often indentured or enslaved. Native Americans would only get worse in the 19th century, leading to greater confinement and the extermination of native people. Unfortunately, the colonial era was neither the start nor the end of the long, dark history of the treatment of Native Americans by Europeans.
The majority of colonists were Europeans so in Colonial America Europeans were treated the best as they were much of the population, they also had rule over Africans and Native Americans.
The groups most of the time did not get along because they all had different ideas and because Native Americans Believed their land was stolen from them. But an idea that hurt them was enslaving people of color, this started fights against the people of color and the Europeans. In the end, the Europeans had full control over them
Newsela "All they want is my voice":The real story of "Mother of the blues" Ma Rainey answers 1-4 answers
Which statements best describe the North Carolina gold rush? Check all that apply.
Charlotte developed into a large city as a result of the gold rush.
All the miners who came to North Carolina stayed permanently.
Some mines were major operations with thousands of workers.
Immigrants from different parts of the world came to find gold.
The gold rush helped banking and industry grow in the state.
Cornish miners struggled to settle into life in North Carolina.
Answer:
A,C,D,E
Explanation:
Which principle split the power of the government into three branches?
A)Self-Government
B)Republicanism
C)Limited Government
D)Separation of Powers
Answer:
What is D)Separation of Powers
Explanation:
Separation of powers is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) are kept separate. This is also known as the system of checks and balances, because each branch is given certain powers so as to check and balance the other branches.
Please allow me to know if I helped with a thank you, rating or brainly.
Thank you,
Miss Hawaii
Around 1805, only a few years after Conrad’s discovery, newspapers began reporting on gold-mining activities and people coming into the area to search for gold. William Thornton, of Baltimore, Maryland, designer of the United States Capitol, was one of these seekers. After learning of the gold, he purchased thirty-five thousand acres of land in Montgomery (now Stanly) County and formed the North Carolina Gold Mine Company. By 1806, investors in this company included a former governor of Maryland and the treasurer of the United States.
–“The North Carolina Gold Rush,”
Rebecca Lewis
What does this passage suggest about the discovery of gold in North Carolina?
The gold rush brought many different kinds of people to the state.
The gold rush resulted in many people from North Carolina moving to other states.
The gold rush attracted only unskilled laborers to the state.
The gold rush had little effect on population changes in North Carolina.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
What was one cultural result of Roman rule in Europe?
A. Most of Europe shares a common language.
B. Most of Europe became Christian.
C. People began to migrate to Europe from Africa and South Asia.
D. The Christian church split into separate churches.
Answer: Christianity and a church of a Roman character, the most enduring legacy of the ancient world, became one of the most important features in western European civilization.
Answer: I think the answer is B
Explanation: It was under the Roman Empire that the Christian religion penetrated into Europe. By winning recognition as the religion of the state, it added a new basic factor of equality and unification to the imperial civilization and at the same time reintroduced Middle Eastern and Hellenistic elements into the West.
What was the role of William Lloyd Garrison and how did he affect the political life of Mississippi?
Answer:He created The Liberator, a newspaper that bashed Southerners for owning slaves.
Explanation:
cuz
Fill in the blank
o After formal services in the white church, slaves usually conducted their own religious ceremonies called praise meetings' These praise meetings were usually _________________________ in origin and allowed them to preserve some of the cultural feature of their African heritage.
Answer:
AFRICAN
Explanation:
EXERPT FROM ANTEBELLUM MISSISSIPPI---CHAPTER 5
Religion among the Slaves
Next to the family, religion was the most important feature of slave life in the quarters. A deep faith and hope of deliverance sustained the slaves during their long years of bondage. On most plantations, slaves went to church with the white people. Then, after formal services in the white church, slaves usually conducted their own religious ceremonies called praise meetings. Those activities took place in the quarters and were attended only by the slaves.
In the praise meetings, slaves were free to express their innermost feelings through their songs, chants, spirituals, and dances—many of which were African in origin. Slaves were unrestrained at those times. They often acted out their deepest anxieties, frustrations, and anger in tribal dances, accompanied by the rhythmic chanting and clapping of other slaves. These ceremonies were an escape for slaves and enabled them to “let off steam” that might otherwise have been expressed in some form of violence. These religious activities also enabled slaves to preserve some of the cultural features of their African heritage.
why did asian immigrants want to move to Texas
Answer:
To find jobs building railroads.
Explanation:
(I'm assuming you mean the 1800th century time period)
Many Asian immigrants moved to Texas in the 1870s when the first modern transportation routes were being built in Houston and El Paso.
HELPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ONLY IF YOU KNOW THE ANSWER!!! PLEAS I NEED THIS ASAP!!!!!!
By now, you should be able to identify the background and purpose of the Bill of Rights and explain why it is still important today. Without it, Americans would not be free to speak, worship, or do many other things. When the first Congress of the United States wrote these 10 amendments to the Constitution, they set the ground rules for many of the freedoms that American people continue to enjoy. Other amendments to the Constitution have been added over the years. The newest amendments provide more rights to citizens and set up rules that the government must follow.
In a recent poll, less than 10 percent of American adults knew why the Bill of Rights was written! Something must be done to inform people, and you are just the person to do it. You will take on the role of someone who has recently been granted U.S. citizenship. Use your imagination to create your own name and story.
As a new citizen, you are excited about the freedoms and rights that your new government protects. You would like to help other citizens, including immigrants like you, understand what these rights mean.
Hello, I'm { name}. Today I'm here to tell you about why the bill of rights was written. The Main reason of Creation was the amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government were reserved for the states. Bills of right is important because they put limits on the national government's right to control specific civil liberties and rights, many of which were already protected by some of the state constitutions. Liberties protected included freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly (1st Amendment). As citizens we are extremely lucky to have this document to protect and ensure us all of our freedoms and rights. Thomas Jefferson once said, “A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference.” This perfectly outlines the importance of the Bill of Rights and its role in America. As a citizen, the Bill of Rights has a huge affect on me daily. As citizens we are extremely lucky to have this document to protect and ensure us all of our freedoms and rights. Perhaps the most famous section of the Bill of Rights is the First Amendment. This right is so important, because it protects our rights to speech, press, petition, religion, and assembly. Especially as a young adult just starting to explore my political views the freedom of speech is very significant. Freedom of speech gives me the protection and security to say whatever my opinions are, regardless of how the president or the governor or anyone thinks. I am not afraid to speak out against how things are, because thanks to the freedom of speech and the Bill of the Rights I know that I am protected to say my mind. This freedom is extended even farther when we as citizens are granted the right to petition and assemble. These two freedoms are important because if I wanted to, I could organize some event, in order to try to create a change. The Fourth Amendment:This amendment is so crucial in my life, because it protects me from any unlawful search and seizure. This guarantees my privacy I have as a citizen. While I do not have anything to hide, this amendment affects my life, because I know I can live in piece of mind, where I am not worried about anyone going through any of my personal belongings. The piece of mind allows me to live a normal life without a fear of having to hide something just because I do not want a person to find it.The Second Amendment allows the freedom to bear arms. Although I am against personally using a gun, it is good to know that if ever necessary, I could protect myself. Thirdly, the Bill of Rights grants that soldiers may not be quartered without consent. This does not apply to today very well, but it’s an important protection that should still be appreciated. The Fourth Amendment protects from unreasonable search and seizure. I have never been, nor ever hope to be, suspected of a crime, so this is not entirely applicable to me but it affects me in that I am protected from random searches.The Ninth Amendment recognizes the other rights that we possess and grants that the Constitution will not restrict these rights. This gives me the freedom to choose where I go to college, what I do on my Saturday nights, and where I get my groceries.The Bill of Rights, which may not entirely apply to my life at this time, gives freedoms that allow me to live a life that is led by me, not an overbearing government.Overall, the Bill of Rights’ significance is so great, that many citizens do not realize how much it protects.
A number x is no more than 4 units away from 2. Write and solve an absolute-value inequality to show the range of possible values of x.
A) |x + 2| ≤ 4
−6 ≤ x ≤ 2
B)|x − 2| ≤ 4
−2 ≤ x ≤ 6
C)|x − 4| ≤ 2
2 ≤ x ≤ 6
D)|x + 4| ≤ 2
−6 ≤ x ≤ −2
Answer:
x=8
Explanation:
PLEASE WORK HARD AND FAST AND I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLIST
Compare and contrast Andrew Jackson’s and Henry Clay’s arguments about American Indian removal. Write a paragraph explaining each man’s opinion on this issue. Use evidence from the documents to support your conclusions. Access the documents here.
Write 4-5 sentences
Answer:
[A speedy removal] will relieve the whole State of Mississippi and the western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those States to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power. It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will [slow down] the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and through the influence of good counsels, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community. . . . The consequences of a speedy removal will be important to the United States, to individual States, and to the Indians themselves. . . . It will place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters.
–President Andrew Jackson, 1830
Explanation:
In 1830 Henry Clay, one of the most prominent members of the House of Representatives, spoke out against American Indian removal. In this speech, he quotes from an 1814 statement by the US government that says American Indians have a legal right to their lands and are not subject to US laws. The United States stand charged with the fate of those poor children of the woods, in the face of their common Maker, and in presence of the world. And as certain as the guardian is answerable for the education of his infant [child], and the management of his estate, will they be responsible here and hereafter. . . . “The Indians [living] within the United States are so far independent that they live under their own customs, and not under the laws of the United States; that their rights upon the lands where they inhabit or hunt are secured to them by boundaries defined in [friendly] treaties between the United States and themselves; and that whenever those boundaries [are changed, they will] receive from the United States ample [payment] for . . . the land ceded by them.”
–Henry Clay, 1830 Im sorry i am not much use but can i have brainliest please!!!
Clay had remarked that he believed Native Americans were a lower form of life who could never merge with the American people, but Jackson claimed that removal would "incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier."
Compare and contrast Henry Clay's and Andrew Jackson's positions on the expulsion of American Indians.In a speech to Congress, President Andrew Jackson discusses the expulsion of Native Americans. He shared the viewpoint of the majority of politicians of the day that the rights of independent white farmers should take precedence over those of American Indians.
Jackson also understood that, regardless of the agreements made in treaties, European settlers would continue to settle on American Indian territories as the population of the nation increased, which would probably result in conflict. Jackson believed that moving west was best for American Indians.
Henry Clay, one of the most notable members of the House of Representatives, stood out against the deportation of Indians in 1830.
He uses a statement from the US government from 1814 that claims American Indians have a legal claim to their lands and are not subject to US laws in this address.
Learn more about American Indian removal: https://brainly.com/question/28174031
#SPJ2
Helpppppp!!!!!!!!!!????
Answer:
McKee has a fetish to indians, so the answer is
C. McKee is critical of the treatment of American Indians.
Why might people exercise their First Amendment right to petition the government?
to express dissatisfaction with the president
to find a lawyer to represent them in court
to get the government to help fix a problem
to express satisfaction with the government
Answer:
to get the government to help fix a problem
Explanation:
Because they now have the ability to get the government to change things to their standards. I'm not super sure how to explain this one. I still hope this helped!
Let me know if it did :D
Have a great day :)
How would the governor be chosen according to the Constitutional Convention of 1835?
by voters
by justices
by slaveholders
by the state assembly
Answer:
By the state assembly.
Explanation:
The governor was chosen by the general assembly vice the voters in each county.
Answer:
By the state assembly.
Explanation:
History channel is how i know. Also i learned this in high school.
hey, I've been doing this for like an hour so I need your help please make it simple because I read a bunch of articles and watched videos but still do not understand.
the incorporation doctrine has been used to apply the bill of rights to the states and not just to the federal government. Explain how the Incorporation Doctrine serves to safeguard individual rights. Give examples of freedoms it protects and at least one specific example of when it has been used.
Answer:
The incorporation doctrine is a constitutional doctrine through which the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution (known as the Bill of Rights) are made applicable to the states through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Incorporation applies both substantively and procedurally. Prior to the doctrine's (and the Fourteenth Amendment's) existence, the Bill of Rights applied only to the Federal Government and to federal court cases. States and state courts could choose to adopt similar laws, but were under no obligation to do so.
After the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court favored a process called “selective incorporation.” Under selective incorporation, the Supreme Court would incorporate certain parts of certain amendments, rather than incorporating an entire amendment at once.
Some argue that Privileges or Immunities Clause is a more appropriate textual basis than the due process clause for incorporation of the Bill of Rights but because Slaughter-House Cases dealing with this clause are surrounded by controversy this theory is not supported by the majority of the court.
Does this help?