This headline recounts a story that can best be described as a(n) __________.
A.
act of affirmative action
B.
act of racial profiling
C.
hate crime
D.
attempt at segregation


Please select the best answer from the choices provided

A
B
C
D

If North Korea formed a different kind of government where a large number of North Korean citizens were able to exert influence over decision-making, this would be a change from a dictatorship democracy to a participatory democracy.

This form of democracy refers to a government system in which the citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives, rather than through only the elected representatives.

Therefore, when the North Korean citizens were able to exert influence over decision-making, this would be a change from a dictatorship democracy to a participatory democracy.

Read more about democracy

brainly.com/question/22468379

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Northern Pacific Railroad

Explanation:

The Northern Pacific Railroad was charter by the government for connecting the Great Lakes with Puget Sound. Migration of people to a new region and beginning their life with opening new lands for ranching, farming, logging (woodcutting) and mining. It also connected Washington and Oregon with the rest of the country that led to an open market in larger extend.

Answer:

by building roads and waystations

Explanation:

Answer:

B.) by building roads and waystations

Explanation:

took the unit test

Answer:

i gtg study for the exams on monday

Explanation:

Teachers are making us lol

The reason why Powhatan attacked the Chesapeake people was due to the fact that The Chesapeake's had been raiding Powhatan's villages.

The war that took place with this two sides in the 1600s was due to the action of the English settlers when they came to the area. They had clime to an area that was not theirs and as the visitor that they were supposed to be, they had instead fought for the ownership of the area with the original owners.

Both of these sides had to resort in the torturing, the kidnapping and the killing of each other in these wars. This brought about the attacking of Jamestown by the Powhattan's. This was because they believed that the English were not there for trade but instead wanted to take over the land.

Hence The reason why Powhatan attacked the Chesapeake people was due to the fact that The Chesapeake's had been raiding Powhatan's villages.

Read more on Powhatan  here: https://brainly.com/question/695119

#SPJ1

Increases in A) The frequency of floods, droughts, and other problems related to nature contributed most directly to the ideas expressed in the excerpt about climate change.

Climate change refers to the long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns due to natural or human activities.

Some of the climate changes witnessed most recently included:

Direct manifestations of climate change have occurred with

Thus, when discussing climate change, increases in A) The frequency of floods, droughts, and other problems related to nature contributed most directly to the ideas expressed.

Learn more about climate change at https://brainly.com/question/1789619

#SPJ1

Answer:

lack of food.........

Answer:

lack of labor

Explanation:

After the war, the South suffered from destroyed buildings, railroads, plantation and the like. However, many of the slaves became free. This meant that there was no lack of labor even after the war. These free slaves started working on lands again through the sharecropping system. This allowed the black people to rent a small area of land from a landlord. When harvesting day comes, the sharecropper would give a portion of his harvest to the landlord. This happened in the early years of the Reconstruction period.

Answer:

Its A got it right on Edg2020

Answer:

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Explanation:

Answer:

While national efforts to reduce global warming emissions in the United States have flagged, one tropical developing nation, Brazil, has made dramatic strides—without receiving much attention for its success. Detailed analyses of publicly available satellite photos show that Brazil has reduced deforestation in the Amazon enough over the past five years to lower heat-trapping emissions more than any other country on Earth. This success demonstrates the enormous potential of reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation as well as conserving and re-growing tropical forests (the international effort known as REDD+).REDD+ was proposed by developing countries in 2005 as an international strategy by which tropical countries would reduce deforestation (which is responsible for about 10 percent of all global warming pollution) and be compensated by wealthy nations for any resulting economic losses. Two of the strongest initial supporters of the concept were Norway, which pledged $2.5 billion for the effort, and Brazil, which announced a national plan to reduce its deforestation rate 80 percent by 2020 (compared with its average rate over the decade 1996–2005) and later made this commitment part of its national law.

Between 2005 and 2010, Brazil nearly met its goal—a full decade ahead of schedule. Data from 2009–2010 showed that Brazil’s area of deforestation, which averaged 19,508 square kilometers (km2) per year during the baseline decade of 1996–2005, had dropped 67 percent, to just 6,451 km2. UCS analysis of this change, using a formula for converting deforested area to CO2 emissions based on the work of the research institute IMAZON, estimated a reduction in Brazil’s global warming pollution of nearly 1 billion tons.

Norway has committed $1 billion to compensate Brazil for its emissions reductions; the first payment of $110 million was made in 2009. And unlike the case with “offset” funding (whereby corporations in industrialized nations pay for emissions reductions in tropical countries and, in exchange, are permitted to emit more heat-trapping gases in their own countries), there will be no corresponding increase in Norway’s emissions as a result of its commitment to Brazil.

Thus, the cooperation of these two countries has already achieved a reduction in global warming pollution comparable to the reductions that both the United States and the European Union have only pledged to achieve by 2020. This means it is no longer necessary to talk about REDD+ as a proposal or a set of future actions—we can now see how REDD+ works, and that it can be remarkably successful.

What is even more impressive is that Brazil has achieved this success while simultaneously increasing agricultural production and significantly reducing hunger and poverty. During the last decade the country has enjoyed a high rate of GDP growth and exported large amounts of beef and soy despite the world recession. Moreover, through social programs such as Fome Zero (Zero Hunger) and Bolsa Familia (Family Allowances), Brazil has lifted more than 10 million of its citizens out of poverty and substantially lowered rates of hunger and malnutrition.

How it was done

Brazil’s dramatic reduction in deforestation is the result of several different efforts. First, at both state and federal levels, the country greatly expanded its network of indigenous reserves and protected areas (including sustainable-use reserves), which now encompass more than half of Brazil’s Amazon forest. Just as important, these reserves have been effectively protected. Indigenous peoples now control 20 percent of the Brazilian Amazon, and their collective land tenure rights have been reinforced by official titles and the support of the state in stopping illegal encroachment by non-indigenous ranchers, farmers, and miners. Strong enforcement of logging laws, including seizures of illegal timber, closing of illegal sawmills, and jailing of the perpetrators (including government officials who had been taking bribes to look the other way), has shown that the government’s commitment to stopping deforestation is real.

Brazil’s citizens played a critical role in pushing their government to go further and in exerting pressure for change on the businesses that are the main agents of deforestation. The Zero Deforestation campaign, for example, which was launched in 2008 by a broad coalition of environmental, indigenous, rubber-tapper, human rights, and other non-governmental organizations (NGOs), played an important role in pushing the federal government to act. In 2006 and 2009, Brazilian NGOs also conducted widely publicized exposés of the role the soybean and beef industries have played in deforesting the Amazon; the resulting publicity led to commitments from those industries not to sell products raised on deforested land.

Explanation:

please mark brainliest

Answer:

Well I believe the neighbors behavior is abnormal.

because why would they scream and run, also leaving their grocery's on the ground because of your dog?

Answer:

i dont know sorry

Explanation:

Answer:

C. traveling to a foreign country

Explanation:

Traveling to a foreign country of the following is an example of responsible citizenship.

Learning about culture, cuisine, new locations, music, and the way people go about their daily lives in various areas of the world when traveling promotes a medium for fostering interpersonal ties. The best on-site training is available there. The internet can only provide so much information on a place.

A responsible citizen upholds all national laws and regulations. They have the right to exercise all essential liberties and obligations, including those to vote, pay taxes, and defend the nation from corruption.

By showing respect for others, abiding by the law, and getting involved in their society, one can be a good citizen. A good citizen supports others as they would want to be helped in order to improve their space as well as the spaces of others.

Therefore, Thus option (D) is correct.

Learn more about travel here:

https://brainly.com/question/18090388

#SPJ2

Imprisoning some people is not a contradiction because it is a commitment that is part of the social contract that governs society. On the other hand, it can be said that the United States has done a good job of complying with the principles because it has very relevant laws for all cases.

In the United States, citizens have various rights including liberty, life, and the pursuit of happiness. However, in some cases some citizens are imprisoned as a result of their "free" actions.

In this case, the State is not incurring in a contradiction because society is governed by a set of laws to guarantee the rights of all citizens. Additionally, these laws force all citizens to follow certain rules in exchange for guaranteeing those rights.

Therefore, if a citizen acts in a wrong way that goes against the law, it is impossible for the State to guarantee him the right to freedom because he violated the duties he had as a citizen.

The United States has played a prominent role in fulfilling the rights and duties of citizens because it guarantees them many rights that allow them to have a very good quality of life and access to many services.

However, it is also a system in which all citizens who commit illegal acts are judged for their breach of the law. From the foregoing, it can be inferred that the United States has done a good job in complying with the principles.

Learn more about United States Constitution in: https://brainly.com/question/150922

#SPJ1

Answer:

Britain used mercantilism as a way to secure its interests in the New World. Raw materials were shipped back to England where they were converted to finished goods. These products were then shipped back to the colonies as exports, which the colonists purchased.

Answer:

oilmen

Explanation:

got it right on quiz

Answer:

A.oilman

Explanation:

Answer:

A. His teeth

Explanation:

Theoretically, before Man knew how to use rocks, sticks or even fire, teeth would've been used to eat, taste and talk.

Answer:B and C. the god tian gave the emperor the divine mandate and the emperor gave ppl harsh treatment of extra taxes more taxes and killing anybody he did not like and having a lot of concubines. like A LOT.

Explanation:

The following were characteristics of the rulers of the Zhou dynasty.

The correct options are B and C.

The Zhou Dynasty gradually fell apart over hundreds of years as feudal rulers in outlying provinces gained more power. Eventually, these states surpassed the king in power, ushering in a period of conflict known as the Warring States Period.

The Dutch of Zhou, a regent to the king, held a lot of power at the start of the Zhou Dynasty's rule, and the king rewarded nobles' and generals' loyalty with large plots of land. The Zhou were able to maintain control over a vast land area by delegating regional control in this manner.

Thus, the ideal selection is options B and C.

Learn more about the Zhou Dynasty here:

https://brainly.com/question/14100368

#SPJ6

Answer:

B. The commander said it was nothing.

Explanation:

The answer is D because a synagogue is we’re Jews worship god

Answer:

Catherine extended the borders of the Russian Empire southward and westward to absorb New Russia (part of Ukraine), Crimea, Northern Caucasus, Right-bank Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, and Courland.

Explanation:

Answer:Domestic system, also called putting-out system, production system widespread in 17th-century western Europe in which merchant-employers “put out” materials to rural producers who usually worked in their homes but sometimes laboured in workshops or in turn put out work to others

Explanation:

Answer: Because the immigrants can be from any country, so they struggled to speak english

Answer:

cirrus clouds

Explanation:

long and wispy white clouds are called cirrus clouds

Answer:

I have the first ten answers C, A, D, D, B, D, C, D, D, A

Explanation:

if u have the rest LMK

I have the first ten answers C, A, D, D, B, D, C, D, D, D

Answer:

Explanation:

*The American Yawp is an evolving, collaborative text. Please click here to improve this chapter.*

I. IntroductionII. The Origins of the American RevolutionIII. The Causes of the American RevolutionIV. IndependenceV. The War for IndependenceVI. The Consequences of the American RevolutionVII. ConclusionVIII. Primary SourcesIX. Reference Material

I. Introduction

In the 1760s, Benjamin Rush, a native of Philadelphia, recounted a visit to Parliament. Upon seeing the king’s throne in the House of Lords, Rush said he “felt as if he walked on sacred ground” with “emotions that I cannot describe.”1 Throughout the eighteenth century, colonists had developed significant emotional ties with both the British monarchy and the British constitution. The British North American colonists had just helped to win a world war and most, like Rush, had never been more proud to be British. And yet, in a little over a decade, those same colonists would declare their independence and break away from the British Empire. Seen from 1763, nothing would have seemed as improbable as the American Revolution.

The Revolution built institutions and codified the language and ideas that still define Americans’ image of themselves. Moreover, revolutionaries justified their new nation with radical new ideals that changed the course of history and sparked a global “age of revolution.” But the Revolution was as paradoxical as it was unpredictable. A revolution fought in the name of liberty allowed slavery to persist. Resistance to centralized authority tied disparate colonies ever closer together under new governments. The revolution created politicians eager to foster republican selflessness and protect the public good but also encouraged individual self-interest and personal gain. The “founding fathers” instigated and fought a revolution to secure independence from Britain, but they did not fight that revolution to create a “democracy.” To successfully rebel against Britain, however, required more than a few dozen “founding fathers.” Common colonists joined the fight, unleashing popular forces that shaped the Revolution itself, often in ways not welcomed by elite leaders. But once unleashed, these popular forces continued to shape the new nation and indeed the rest of American history.

II. The Origins of the American Revolution

The American Revolution had both long-term origins and short-term causes. In this section, we will look broadly at some of the long-term political, intellectual, cultural, and economic developments in the eighteenth century that set the context for the crisis of the 1760s and 1770s.

Between the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the middle of the eighteenth century, Britain had largely failed to define the colonies’ relationship to the empire and institute a coherent program of imperial reform. Two factors contributed to these failures. First, Britain was at war from the War of the Spanish Succession at the start of the century through the Seven Years’ War in 1763. Constant war was politically consuming and economically expensive. Second, competing visions of empire divided British officials. Old Whigs and their Tory supporters envisioned an authoritarian empire, based on conquering territory and extracting resources. They sought to eliminate Britain’s growing national debt by raising taxes and cutting spending on the colonies. The radical (or patriot) Whigs based their imperial vision on trade and manufacturing instead of land and resources. They argued that economic growth, not raising taxes, would solve the national debt. Instead of an authoritarian empire, “patriot Whigs” argued that the colonies should have equal status with the mother country. There were occasional attempts to reform the administration of the colonies, but debate between the two sides prevented coherent reform.2

Taking over port cities like New York and Philadelphia aided the Colonists during the American Revolution because it prevented the Germans from receiving supplies. Hence option (C) is correct.

A rebellion known as the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783) led to the formation of the United States of America by 13 of Great Britain's North American possessions.

The war came after more than a decade of escalating hostility between the British crown and a sizable and influential portion of its colonies in North America, which was brought on by British attempts to exercise more control over colonial affairs after having long adopted a policy of salutary neglect. Early in 1778,

the battle was a civil war within the boundaries of the British Empire; however, by the time France and Spain joined the colonies in their fight against Britain later that year (in 1778)

Learn more about American Revolution, from :

brainly.com/question/27833385

#SPJ2