The previous Activities have provided you with an economic and

ethical basis for evaluating kidney-transplant policies. Now it is time for you

to be the policy maker. Read the following information and then decide which

policy you support. Be ready to justify your decision. Which policy saves the

most lives? Which conforms most closely to the ethical framework you find most

acceptable?

OPTION 1: THE CURRENT SYSTEM

A national law makes it illegal to sell human organs. Anyone who sells a kidney

faces jail, fines or both. People may donate kidneys, however, and doctors dis-

tribute donated kidneys on the basis of need. Some of the factors they consider

in allocating kidneys are the patient’s age and medical condition, how long the

patient has been on a waiting list and whether the donor is in the local area.

Under this system, there is a shortage of kidneys, and many people are on a

waiting list for years. During this time they receive costly dialysis treatment,

and many people die.

OPTION 2: AN OPEN MARKET

Create an open market in kidneys. People may sell their kidneys on the mar-

ket for the highest price they can get. They may sell and deliver a kidney while

they are still alive, or they may sell for delivery after they die. Brokerage firms

match buyers and sellers. People could even sell kidneys on eBay. Recipients

would pay for the kidney the same way they pay for other medical care: with

their own funds or through insurance, government programs and charity.
OPTION 3: A REGULATED MARKET

Create a market in which anyone may sell a kidney, but only authorized insti-

tutions such as hospitals may legally buy. This option reduces the possibility

of acquiring kidneys through involuntary means such as theft or murder. The

institutions would allocate the kidneys on a basis similar to the way kidneys

are allocated today using age, medical need or time spent on a waiting list.

Recipients would pay for the kidneys with private funds, insurance,

government assistance and charity.

OPTION 4: A COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH

This approach uses nonmarket mechanisms to increase the supply in

several ways.

A marketing campaign would increase people’s awareness of the issue and alter

their preferences for organ donation through moral persuasion. The slogan for a

national television campaign might be “Friends don’t let friends waste the gift

of life.” This is not an appeal to altruism but to people’s sense of moral obliga-

tion and duty.

A more authoritarian policy would legally mandate that when people die, all

their organs will be donated unless they indicate otherwise. People who don’t

want to donate must take the extra step to note this in advance on their driv-

er’s license. Today people must agree in advance for their organs to be donated.
2 -3 paragraphs ​

7.1 percent, a new record, represents the percentage of U.S. adults who self-identify as homosexual, gay, bisexual, transgender, or as someone who is not heterosexual. This is double the number from 2011 when Gallup first took this measurement.

The LGBT social movements and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) pride are symbolized by the rainbow flag. The colors, which are sometimes referred to as the gay pride flag or LGBT pride flag, represent the diversity of the LGBT population as well as the range of sexual orientations and gender identities.

The proportion of adults who identify as LGBT has been largely stable among traditionalists, baby boomers, and members of Generation X since Gallup started tracking LGBT identification in 2011. The proportion of millennials has also increased slightly, from 5.8% in 2011 (when some members of the generation had not yet reached the age of 18) to 7.8% in 2017 and 10.5 percent now.

Since 2017, when just the youngest members of Generation Z—those born between 1997 and 1999—had reached adulthood, the percentage of that generation who identify as LGBT has nearly doubled. 10.5 percent of the small portion of the generation who were adults at the time identified as LGBT.

Learn more about the LGBT Rainbow flag here:

https://brainly.com/question/9332926

#SPJ2

Answer:

hmmmm.... okay so I should try this too see if im.right but I'm trying to do law school

Answer:

Human behavior is passed on generation to generation. Even though many behaviors are instinctive and are hereditary. Biology and the social environment play a may give a reason in th cause of the crime.

Explanation:

Answer:

No

Explanation:

No, the UPS employer is not acting legally by firing Kenneth. As long as an employer is able to fulfill all of the requirements of the job then they are protected and cannot legally be fired without proper reason for termination. If the employee gets injured on the job they are eligible for filling a workers' compensation claim. If an employer fires an employee for any on the job related injury then they are doing so illegally and can be sued by the employee for doing so.

Answer:

First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority, the bill moves to the Senate.

Answer:

sorry i do not know number one.

Brandon Luna

He has handled over 5000 criminal cases as a former Deputy District Attorney and now offers his experience to you as a Criminal Defense Attorney. He started Luna Law to help good people who have made a mistake navigate through the confusing and often scary criminal justice system.

Answer:

Rule #1: N0 B00mers

Rule #2: N0 Z00mers

Rule #3: N0 Weebs (under the penalty 0f death) ((I'm l00king at y0u Phil))

Rule #4: N0 Marvel Stans

Rule #5: Stan L00na

Rule #6: N0 K-P0p

Rule #7: (bbh) N0 My Little P0ny, Friendship Is F--K

Rule #8: N0 Vide0s I've Already Seen Bef0re

Rule #9: Staged Vide0s Are S--T

Rule #10: Ign0re rule number 5

Rule #11: L0ud Are S0METIMES Funny

Rule #12: Respect All Auth0rity, Unless They Challenge Y0ur Rights. If S0, Break A Windshield (That Was a J0ke for Legal Purp0ses)

I don't know #2 :')

Answer:

I'm sorry WHAT, I'm randomly scrolling through and I saw this and-

Explanation:

W H A T

Answer:

I never understood this one

Answer:

Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself

Explanation:

Answer: prison riots and increased interpersonal violence

Explanation:

With prisoners having more freedom in prisons, they regularly came into contact with other prisoners. As the prisons became overcrowded, contact with other prisoners increased and so did tensions.

These tensions boiled over into interpersonal violence and conflict which escalated sometimes into full blown riots such as the Attica Prison riot of 1971 and the Ohio State Penitentiary riot in 1968.

I'm pretty sure its job availability and lifetime earnings because it cant be credit worthiness because being in prison doesn't affect that

Direct and circumstantial evidence are the two categories of evidence. The People assert that there is circumstantial proof of the defendant's guilt in this instance.

Let me describe the distinctions between direct and circumstantial evidence.

Direct evidence is proof of a fact that is based on the firsthand experience or observation of the witness.

Direct evidence may be used to prove a person's guilt of a charged offense if, taken alone, it convinces a jury that the individual is guilty of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

A person may properly deduce the existence or nonexistence of another fact from circumstantial evidence, which is direct evidence of a fact. Circumstantial evidence may be used to establish a person's guilt of an alleged crime,if the evidence raises a fair inference of guilt even though it does not prove guilt explicitly.

Let me give you an illustration of how direct evidence and circumstantial evidence vary.

Learn  more about  Evidence here

https://brainly.com/question/10214827

#SPJ5

Go live in L'Manburg.

Answer:

So the prices will not get too high. The higher the minimum wage, the higher the price is for the product the company is selling.

Explanation:

So if Wendy's minumun wage is $7.50 an hour, and a burger is 4.00. If you raise the wage to $15, the burger price will go up

Answer:

75,000

Explanation:

i belive this correct

Answer: 8⁷/₂₄ pounds of beans.

Explanation:

First convert both fractions to improper fractions.

4 ⁵/₈ = 37/8

3²/₃ = 11/3

Find the lowest common multiple of 3 and 8 which is 24.

Use 24 as the denominator and add the fractions by multiplying the numerator by the result you get from dividing 24 by the denominator:

[tex]= \frac{111 + 88}{24} \\\\= \frac{199}{24} \\\\= 8\frac{7}{24} pounds of beans[/tex]

pwease pick me as brainliset :((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

Answer:

under

Explanation:

Barbara Charline Jordan was an American lawyer, educator and politician who was a leader in the Civil Rights Movement. A Democrat, she was the first African American elected to the Texas Senate after Reconstruction and the first Southern African-American woman elected to the United States House of Representatives.

Answer:

What he meant was that we are a nation of laws that means we have laws to fallow not men. This was keeping from people Ruling and being powerful.

Explanation:

Explanation:

bankruptcy cases would be heard in a federal court

Answer:

that she is a murder and she needs to go to jail for life

Explanation: