The letter's significance as a source of information on popular attitudes to Bolshevik revolutionary policies lies in the fact that it suggests that some Soviet citizens were unhappy with the situation.
In 1917, Russia underwent a drastic change when the Bolsheviks took power. Lenin and the Bolsheviks promised many things to the people, including the redistribution of land, a representative government, and a socialist economy.
The letter's significance as a source of information on popular attitudes to Bolshevik revolutionary policies lies in the fact that it suggests that some Soviet citizens were unhappy with the situation. It could be argued that the letter is a historical document in that it gives us a glimpse of what life was like for Soviet citizens during this time period.
Additionally, it provides us with insight into the way that people were thinking and feeling about the new Bolshevik government. We can infer from the letter that not everyone was happy with the way things were going and that many people were struggling to adjust to the new way of life.
Overall, the letter is a valuable source of information for historians and students of Soviet history because it provides a unique perspective on the early years of Bolshevik rule.
To know more about Bolshevik revolutionary policies refer here:https://brainly.com/question/8074450#
#SPJ11
An armistice was reached in early December 1917 and a formal cease-fire was declared December 15, but determining the terms of peace between Russia and the Central Powers proved to be far more complicated.
The armistice was a welcome relief for both parties, as the war had been long and brutal.
The terms of the armistice included the removal of all Russian forces from the territories they had occupied and the evacuation of German troops from occupied Russian territories. Both sides agreed to exchange prisoners of war and to start negotiations for a final settlement. However, the negotiations soon stalled.
The Central Powers felt that the terms of the armistice were too generous to the Russians and the Russians felt that their demands for the reparations were not being taken seriously. With the collapse of the Bolshevik government, the negotiations broke down and no peace treaty was reached.
To know more about armistice, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30521468
#SPJ4
THE GREEN, WHITE, AND RED STRIPES IN THE MEXICAN FLAG ARE THE REMINDERS OF THE AZTEC PAST.
IS IT TRUE OR FALSE.
CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE
Answer:
The answer is true
Explanation:
Mexico city used to be the heart of the Aztec empire, when the empire fell and modernization fell into place. There was no room for the old ways of the Aztecs. So the place we know and love.... Mexico, created its flag to represent the Aztec symbol.
Rationalize whether or not there were others alternatives to appeasement during the 1930s that would’ve prevented WWII? SHORT ANSWER PLS
Just a few of the causes include the League of Nations, alliances, conflict and the dread of war, pacifism and isolation, economic appeasement and colonial fortifications, weapons and fortifications, and pacifism.
What caused appeasement to fail in the 1930s?The failure of the policy was mostly attributable to the appeasement strategy's poor judgment; Hitler's objectives of increasing Lebensraum and the limits of Germany went well beyond the legitimate grievances of Versailles.
What role did appeasement have in the start of World War II?Yet, appeasement led to a new problem, which ultimately led to the Second World War. Because to appeasement, Hitler's Germany was able to sign the Nazi-Soviet pact without worrying about a two-front war, which encouraged his risk-taking and expansionist worldview even more.
Learn more about appeasement strategy: https://brainly.com/question/11926493
#SPJ1
could the Hapsburgs or Ottoman Turks could have built a modern, unified nation, from their multinational empires.
i give brainly
Answer:
History has shown that it's possible to do that; look at the United States, for example. What's needed is to band together to build a new country rather than insist on state borders based on ethnic population--then no one is happy. In that way, it would have been probably impossible for either the Hapsburgs or the Ottomans to achieve that kind of state.
Which texas governor promised $30 a month for every person age 65 and older in the state? question 2 options: A. Ross sterling B. James Allred C. Wilbert lee O'Daniel D. Miriam Amanda Ferguson
The texas governor promised $30 a month for every person age 65 and older in the state Wilbert Lee O'Daniel. option (C) is correct.
The aim to pay $30 per month for each age 65 is to ease the destitution and monetary weight on the elderly folks. he is the previous Texas lead representative that guaranteed $30 per month for each age 65 and more seasoned in the state.
The financial plan execution power to deal with the state's allocations while the Council isn't in a meeting. Spending plan execution authority allows the state to redistribute existing assignments for monetary crises that happen between official meetings. Therefore, option (C) is correct.
Learn more about Wilbert lee:
https://brainly.com/question/25723904
#SPJ4
Chapter 23 is Mainly about the Inequality in the U.S. during and after the Vietnam War. Write a 400 to 500 word small essay on the type of inequality that was obvious as well as the victims of the inequalities . Within the same essay , think about inequalities in present time, and compare those to the inequalities back in the time of the Vietnam War Period. Has much changed from the 1960s to the 2020s
PLEASE HELP ME
NEED HELP URGENT
Chapter 23 of American history digs into the inequality that won during and after the Vietnam War in the United States. During the war, the draft framework made a feeling of inequality among the populace. The affluent and strong could stay away from the draft by different means, while poor people and oppressed had no such choices. Moreover, the racial inequality that existed in the nation was additionally exacerbated during the Vietnam War, as African Americans and Latinos were lopsidedly drafted and killed in the war.
Another kind of inequality that was pervasive during the Vietnam War was monetary inequality. The war prompted a critical increase in government spending, which mainly helped the military-industrial complex. This spending didn't stream down to the typical American, who confronted inflation and a stale economy. The troopers who battled in Vietnam, a large number of whom were from working-class families, likewise confronted financial difficulties when they got back. Numerous veterans battled to find work and experienced emotional wellness issues, which further sustained the financial and social inequalities that existed in the country.
In the present time, inequality actually exists in the United States. Income inequality has arrived at record levels, with the top 1% owning a critical piece of the nation's riches. Racial inequality likewise remains a tenacious issue, as proven by the People of color Matter development and the ongoing battle for correspondence in the criminal equity framework. Also, orientation inequality is as yet common, as ladies continue to procure not as much as people for a similar work and face discrimination in the work environment.
However, there have been a few positive changes as far as inequality in the United States since the Vietnam War period. For instance, the Social equality Demonstration of 1964 and the Voting Privileges Demonstration of 1965 assisted with addressing a portion of the racial inequalities that existed at that point. Furthermore, social wellbeing net projects like Government backed retirement, Federal health care, and Medicaid have assisted with reducing destitution and offer help to those out of luck.
All in all, the Vietnam War period in the United States was set apart by different types of inequality, including monetary, racial, and social inequality. While some headway has been made in addressing these issues in the present time, there is still quite far to go. It is crucial for continue working towards creating a more impartial society and ensuring that all individuals approach similar open doors and privileges, no matter what their experience or conditions.
Actividad 4. Lee el siguiente fragmento de la novela Fahrenheit 451, de Ray Bradbury, y analízalo según lo solicitado. Analiza el fragmento del texto de Ray Bradbury. Para ello, haz lo siguiente: •Busca el significado de las palabras que no comprendas. Luego, vuelve a leer el texto. • ¿Qué elementos de la ciencia-ficción reconoces en este fragmento? Puedes tomar ejemplos textuales. • Según lo leído, ¿por qué crees que los bomberos queman casas en lugar de apagar incendios? • ¿Cómo crees que serían las personas si, al igual que en el fragmento, leer estuviera prohibido? • ¿Crees que el texto refleja una realidad posible con personas que ignoran la naturaleza y publicidad masiva? Y si es así, ¿es algo bueno o malo? Reflexiona con tus familiares
The elements of science fiction present in this excerpt are a dystopian society where books are banned, burned, and considered a threat to the government's power.
The reason why firefighters burn houses instead of putting out fires is because in this society, books are considered a threat to the government's power and the people's happiness. They believe that books make people think too much and question authority, which could lead to chaos and unrest. Thus, they seek to eliminate books and prevent people from reading them.
If reading were prohibited, people would be less informed and less critical of the world around them. They would have less access to knowledge, ideas, and different perspectives, which could limit their ability to make informed decisions and think for themselves. They may also be more easily manipulated by those in power.
learn more about dystopian society here:
https://brainly.com/question/21492879
#SPJ4
the complete question is:
Activity 4. Read the following excerpt from the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and analyze it as requested. Analyze the fragment of Ray Bradbury's text. To do so, do the following:
• Look up the meaning of words you don't understand. Then read the text again.
• What elements of science fiction do you recognize in this excerpt? You can give textual examples.
• Based on what you've read, why do you think firefighters burn houses instead of putting out fires?
• How do you think people would be if, like in the excerpt, reading was prohibited?
• Do you think the text reflects a possible reality with people who ignore nature and massive advertising? And if so, is it something good or bad? Reflect with your family.
which term best reflects the cultural, social, intellectual, and artistic accomplishments of african americans in the 1920s to mid-1930s?
If the Great Migration gave him geographical benefits, it was Harlem, where he was inspired to create art during the 1920s and 1930s Harlem Renaissance, a period of intellectual and cultural explosion.
What is meant by Great Migration?One of the biggest human migrations in American history was the Great Migration. Throughout the period between the 1910s and the 1970s, almost six million Black Americans relocated from the American South to the northern, midwestern, and western states. It was mostly brought on by the deplorable economic circumstances that African Americans experienced, as well as the pervasive racial discrimination and segregation that existed in the Southern states where Jim Crow laws were implemented.The migration's objective accomplished, it came to an end in the 1970s when enough changes had occurred in the South for African-Americans to no longer feel under pressure to relocate and be free to reside wherever they pleased.To learn more about Great Migration, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/21201
How are sole proprietorships different than corporations?
O They have an easier time raising money to start their business.
O They don't have to pay taxes on profits.
O They are supported by stockholders.
O Their owners make all business decisions.
Their owners make all business decisions.
Why it is?
Sole proprietorships and corporations are two different types of business structures. The key difference between them is in their ownership structure and liability. A sole proprietorship is a business owned and operated by one person who is responsible for all aspects of the business. The owner has complete control over decision-making, but also has unlimited liability for any debts or legal issues the business may face.
In contrast, corporations are owned by shareholders who have limited liability and do not have direct control over the day-to-day operations of the business. Corporations can raise money more easily by issuing stocks, and they have the ability to attract investors, which can help them grow more quickly.
To know more about corporation related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30029715
#SPJ1
how does each piece of evidence help to explain why african americans migrated to newark at the beginning of the 20th century?
The beginning of the 20th century saw a dramatic increase in African American migration to Newark. This was due to a number of factors, including the rise of industrialization, increased job opportunities, and the promise of a better life.
The Great Migration of African Americans from the South was a major contributor to this population shift. In addition, the expansion of the City Beautiful movement and the development of planned suburban communities in Newark drew African Americans seeking better housing and educational opportunities.
Furthermore, the Harlem Renaissance and its emphasis on African American pride and culture helped to create an environment in Newark that was welcoming to African Americans. All of these factors, combined with the economic opportunities of the city and its proximity to other major cities, created a powerful draw that attracted African Americans to Newark at the turn of the century.
Know more about dramatic increase here
https://brainly.com/question/13047605#
#SPJ11
Write a short paragraph that discusses how the culture of Rome and how it reflected life and values in the Roman Empire.
Pls hurry! :)
Answer:
The culture of Rome was a reflection of the life and values of the Roman Empire. The Romans were known for their military prowess, administrative skills, and engineering innovations. Roman culture was influenced by the Greeks and Etruscans and encompassed art, architecture, literature, and religion. Roman art and architecture were characterized by grandeur, monumentality, and symmetry. Roman literature, particularly poetry, and drama celebrated the virtues of courage, honor, and loyalty. Roman religion, which incorporated elements of pagan and Christian beliefs, emphasized the importance of ritual and sacrifice. Overall, Roman culture represented a powerful and enduring legacy that has influenced Western civilization for centuries.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
which of the following is a consequence of the revolution in saint-domingue? group of answer choices napoleon, having restored slavery in france, waged a successful war that restored french control and slavery on saint-domingue. after defeating the french in saint-domingue, the revolutionaries offered their assistance to those who wished to rebel in brazil. president thomas jefferson refused to recognize the new nation, worried that its success might inspire similar revolts in the united states. it discouraged the revolutionaries in latin america.
One of the major consequences of the revolution in Saint-Domingue (modern-day Haiti) was that Napoleon, who had restored slavery in France, waged a successful war to restore French control and slavery in Saint-Domingue.
After defeating the French in Saint-Domingue, the revolutionaries offered their assistance to those who wished to rebel in Brazil. Unfortunately, President Thomas Jefferson refused to recognize the new nation, worried that its success might inspire similar revolts in the United States.
This lack of recognition and support by the US discouraged the revolutionaries in Latin America.
The revolution in Saint-Domingue was one of the most successful slave rebellions in history, and it had a lasting impact on the politics of Latin America.
The success of the revolution caused France to lose control of Haiti, and it showed other countries that similar rebellions could succeed.
The revolutionaries in Saint-Domingue also offered their support and assistance to those who wished to rebel in Brazil, but President Thomas Jefferson was unwilling to recognize the new nation and discouraged other Latin American revolutions.
Furthermore, the success of the revolution in Saint-Domingue emboldened those in the United States who were fighting for the abolition of slavery.
They saw the revolution as an example of how slaves could gain their freedom. The example of Saint-Domingue also showed how a slave revolt could be successful, and this made the US more determined to put an end to slavery.
In conclusion, the revolution in Saint-Domingue had a lasting impact on Latin American politics, and it encouraged other revolutions in the region. It also served as an example of how slaves could gain their freedom, and it emboldened abolitionists in the United States.
However, President Thomas Jefferson refused to recognize the new nation and discouraged other Latin American revolutions.
To know more about Saint-Domingue here
https://brainly.com/question/26935931
#SPJ11
what was a common argument of those who supported us imperialism in the early 1900s?
Americans' were justified their imperialistic actions by stating that it was required by emerging business. Additionally, they stated that imperialistic actions were justified by their assertion that they were to blame.
Both Europeans and Americans believed that it was their duty as more civilized and Christianized races to elevate and civilize indigenous peoples. This was referred to as the White Man's Burden and was founded on social Darwinist principles. American corporations started to seek abroad as a way to sustain that expanding industry as production expanded. Newspapers and American businesspeople started urging the government to take steps that would promote imperialism and growth. The United States' imperial mission was driven by a desire for new markets for its industrial goods as well as a conviction in the racial and cultural superiority of Americans. They wished to enhance their standing among other European nations.
They desired to elevate their standing and political clout. Every nation competed against its adversaries. Simply to keep your adversary from gaining it, you took territory!
To know more about White Man's Burden, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30236689
#SPJ4
4. The free people of ___________________ were still subject to legal discrimination, no matter how wealthy they became.
The free people of color were still subject to legal discrimination, no matter how wealthy they became.
What is Discrimination?Discrimination can be said to be the unfair or prejudicial treatment of individuals and groups based on characteristics such as race, gender, age, sexual orientation, religion, politics, etc.
Legal discrimination occurs when the discriminatory behavior does not violate any laws. For example, it may be legal to discriminate against a job applicant who lacks certain qualifications for the job.
It is important to note that while discrimination may be legal in some cases, it is not necessarily ethical or fair and should therefore be discouraged.
Learn more about discrimination at brainly.com/question/1084594.
#SPJ1
When was child labor banned in the US?
Child labor was gradually restricted and ultimately banned in the United States through a series of laws and regulations over several decades.
The first significant federal law addressing child labor was the Keating-Owen Child Labor Act of 1916, which was declared unconstitutional in 1918.
However, in 1938, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was passed, which established a federal minimum wage, overtime pay requirements, and also restricted child labor. The FLSA set the minimum age for employment at 16 years old, and it also prohibited the employment of children under the age of 18 in hazardous occupations, such as mining, manufacturing, and operating heavy machinery.
To know more about child labor here
https://brainly.com/question/26978389
#SPJ4
in 1839, the time of the amistad incident until well into the civil war, most people in the u.s. either supported slavery or were willing to tolerate its existence. can you explain this?
The institution of slavery had been deeply entrenched in American society since the colonial era, and it played a crucial role in the economy of the southern states. The cotton industry, for example, was heavily reliant on slave labor, and many white Americans benefited from the profits generated by this industry. Additionally, many people believed in the concept of white supremacy, which held that people of European descent were superior to other races and therefore justified the enslavement of African peoples.
Furthermore, the issue of slavery was complicated by economic and political factors. Many politicians were reluctant to take a strong stance against slavery for fear of alienating southern voters or upsetting the delicate balance of power between northern and southern states. Some northerners who opposed slavery were also hesitant to take action because they feared it could lead to social and economic upheaval.
It was not until the Civil War that a significant number of people in the U.S. began to actively oppose slavery and fight for its abolition. Even then, it took a long and bloody conflict, as well as the tireless efforts of abolitionists and other activists, to ultimately bring an end to this brutal institution.
Which option is an example of a renewable resource?
A. Heat and energy made from burning coal
B. Fuel created by pulling petroleum from the ground
OC. Power from a hydroelectric dam on a river
D. Nuclear power formed by pulling energy from atoms
Answer:
Answer:Fuel created by pulling petroleum from the ground
THE COLD WAR HEATS UP
2. How did Korea become a divided nation after World War II?
Answer:
After World War II, Korea was divided into two zones of occupation - the Soviet Union occupied the northern part of Korea, while the United States occupied the southern part. In 1948, the two zones became separate countries: the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) in the north, and the Republic of Korea (South Korea) in the south. The division was supposed to be temporary, with the goal of reunification, but this never happened due to political and ideological differences between the two sides. In 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea, starting the Korean War, which further solidified the division of the country along the 38th parallel.
Indigenous peoples of California and the Northwest Coast both lived in:
A. settlements near rivers and streams.
B. sturdy houses made of clay and stone.
C. riverboats that floated.
D. portable housing for easy traveling.
Answer: A. settlements near rivers and streams.
Explanation: The indigenous peoples of both regions recognized the importance of proximity to water sources for their survival. Rivers and streams provided them with a reliable supply of water for drinking, cooking, and bathing. They also served as a vital resource for fishing, which was an important source of food for these communities.
Moreover, water from rivers and streams was essential for agriculture. Indigenous peoples in these regions practiced various forms of agriculture, such as cultivating crops like maize, beans, and squash. Access to water allowed them to irrigate their fields and ensure successful harvests.
Finally, living near rivers and streams also facilitated transportation and trade. Waterways served as natural highways, allowing the indigenous peoples to travel between different settlements and engage in trade with neighboring communities. This exchange of goods and ideas played a crucial role in the cultural and economic development of these societies.
Learn more about indigenous peoples here: https://brainly.com/question/28276026.
in 1975 the u.s., canada, the soviet union and most european countries met to sign an international agreement, recognizing post world war ii borders and promising respect for human rights is known as the _____
The Helsinki Accords, also known as the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe, was an international agreement signed in 1975 by the United States, Canada, the Soviet Union, and most European countries.
The agreement recognized the post-World War II borders in Europe and stressed the importance of respecting human rights and basic freedoms. It was the first international agreement to recognize the human rights of citizens in the countries involved. The agreement also set up the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE) to monitor its implementation.
The Helsinki Accords helped to reduce tension in Europe and played an important role in the eventual collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Know more about Helsinki Accords here
https://brainly.com/question/28741211#
#SPJ11
Which country did germany attack by using its blitzkrieg tactics for 57 nights in a row?
Answer:
The country Germany attacked using the blitzkrieg for 57 consecutive nights in a row during WW2 would be Britian.
Explanation:
malala yousafzai was born in what year and in what country?
Malala Yousafzai was born on July 12, 1997, in Mingora, Pakistan. She is a Pakistani activist for female education and the youngest Nobel Prize laureate.
She is known for her activism for education and women's rights, especially in the Swat Valley in northwest Pakistan, where the Taliban had banned girls from attending school. Yousafzai first gained international attention in 2009 when she wrote a blog for BBC Urdu about her life under Taliban rule, which highlighted the challenges faced by girls who wanted to receive an education.
In October 2012, Malala was shot in the head by Taliban gunmen in an assassination attempt, but she survived and continued to be an advocate for girls' education. Her bravery and determination to stand up for what she believed in has made her a global symbol of courage and hope.
To know more about Malala Yousafzai, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30585742
#SPJ4
Describe the steps Hitler took to carry out his 'Final Solution'.
The leaders of Nazi Germany used the phrase "Final Solution of the Jewish Question" to describe their plan. It made reference to the systematic killing of Jews throughout Europe.
Some of the steps Hitler took to carry out his 'Final Solution' were-
During the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, extensive death operations targeting whole Jewish villages were launched by SS and police troops functioning as mobile killing squads.The SS and police started using mobile petrol trucks by the autumn of 1941. The exhaust pipes of these panelled vehicles have been modified to inject deadly carbon monoxide gas into closed compartments, killing everyone within. They were created to support ongoing shooting operations.Jews living in the Generalgouvernement were occasionally executed at the Majdanek camp.The SS slaughtered tens of thousands of Jews in its gas chambers, mostly weak forced workers. At least 167,000 Jews and around 4,300 Roma (Gypsies) were gassed to death by the SS and police.To know more about Hitler visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12778492
#SPJ1
the incidence of tay sachs, an autosomal recessive genetic disorder, is approximately 1 in 3,500 in a certain population of ashkenazi jews. assuming hardy-weinberg equilibrium, what is the frequency of carriers for the tay sachs allele in this population?
The incidence of Tay Sachs, which is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder, is approximately 1 in 3,500 in a certain population of Ashkenazi Jews. Based on the assumption of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of Tay Sachs carriers in this population is 3.3%.
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is defined as a concept that shows how the allele and genotype frequencies in a population change over time. According to the principle, if no genetic drift, mutation, migration, natural selection, or mating biases are present, then the genotype and allele frequencies of a population will remain the same throughout generations.
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium formula for allele frequencies: p + q = 1,
where p is the frequency of the dominant allele, and q is the frequency of the recessive allele.
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium formula for genotype frequencies: p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1,
where p2 represents the frequency of the homozygous dominant genotype, 2pq is the frequency of the heterozygous genotype, and q2 is the frequency of the homozygous recessive genotype.
The frequency of carriers for the Tay Sachs allele in this population is 1 in 3,500 individuals. This is equivalent to
q2 = 1/3500 = 0.0002857.
To obtain the frequency of the recessive allele, q, we need to take the square root of q2:
q = sqrt(0.0002857) = 0.0169 or approximately 1.7%.
Since p + q = 1, the frequency of the dominant allele, p, can be calculated as:
p = 1 - q = 1 - 0.0169 = 0.9831 or approximately 98.3%.
The frequency of Tay Sachs carriers in this population can be calculated as
2pq:2pq = 2 × 0.9831 × 0.0169 = 0.0331 or approximately 3.3%.
Therefore, the frequency of carriers for the Tay Sachs allele in this Ashkenazi Jewish population is approximately 3.3%.
To know more about Tay Sachs refer here: https://brainly.com/question/20630694#
#SPJ11
12. What was the name of the ship, filled with Jewish refugees, that tried to escape Nazi Germany and the Holocaust by coming to Miami Florida in 1939, only to be refused entry and sent back to certain death?
St. Louis was the name of the ship carrying Jewish refugees who , In 1939, sought to escape Nazi Germany and the Holocaust by sailing to Miami, Florida, but were turned away and hauled back to certain death.
This sale was also popularly known as Voyage of St. Louis.
What it entails to be a refugee?Refugees are people who have fled their home country because they fear being persecuted, because of a conflict, because of widespread violence, or because of other situations that have significantly disrupted public order and need international protection.
Who is a refugee?A person outside of their place of origin who is unable or unwilling to return due to persecution or a legitimate fear of persecution due to their ethnicity, religion, nationality, membership in a certain social group, or political viewpoint is referred to as a refugee.
To know more about Refugees visit:
https://brainly.com/question/410469
#SPJ1
in terms of manpower needed to fight the civil war, the south was disadvantaged by (select all that apply)
The South was disadvantaged by several factors in terms of manpower needed to fight the Civil War. These factors include:
Population: The North had a much larger population than the South, which meant they had a larger pool of potential soldiers to draw from.
Industrialization: The North was much more industrialized than the South, which meant they had more resources and could produce weapons and supplies more quickly.
Transportation: The North had a better transportation system than the South, which made it easier for them to move troops and supplies.
Emancipation Proclamation: The North's Emancipation Proclamation allowed African Americans to join the Union Army, which gave the North an additional source of manpower.
These factors contributed to the South being at a disadvantage when it came to manpower needed to fight the Civil War. Despite their courage and determination, the South simply didn't have the resources to match the North's military might.
For more questions like Civil War click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ11
URGENTTTTTTTTTTT
Throughout history, many individuals have greatly influenced Georgia. Their accomplishments, ideas, and inventions have transformed the lives of millions of people.
For this assignment, you will choose one person from Georgia who has influenced the state’s history. You should do outside research and write an informative essay in which you identify your subject’s significance and influence.
( HAS TO BE FROM GEORGIA )
Answer:
Explanation:
One person from Georgia who has greatly influenced the state's history is Martin Luther King Jr. Born in Atlanta on January 15, 1929, Martin Luther King Jr. became a prominent leader in the American Civil Rights Movement during the 1950s and 1960s. He is remembered for his advocacy of nonviolent resistance and his commitment to achieving racial equality.
King's influence on Georgia and the United States can be seen in his role in the Civil Rights Movement. He was a key figure in the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955-1956, which was a pivotal moment in the movement. His leadership of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) helped to organize nonviolent protests and demonstrations throughout the South, including the March on Washington in 1963.
In addition to his activism, King's speeches and writings had a profound impact on Georgia and the United States. His famous "I Have a Dream" speech, delivered at the March on Washington, is one of the most iconic speeches in American history. King's eloquent words and powerful messages of justice and equality inspired millions of people around the world.
King's legacy is still felt in Georgia and beyond today. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, and his birthday is celebrated as a national holiday in the United States. His work paved the way for future generations of civil rights activists, and his ideas continue to inspire people to fight for justice and equality.
In conclusion, Martin Luther King Jr. is a significant figure in Georgia's history and has influenced the state in countless ways. His advocacy of nonviolent resistance and his commitment to achieving racial equality continue to inspire people around the world today. King's legacy serves as a reminder of the power of leadership, activism, and hope in the fight for social justice.
what are olympe de gouges recommendations for reforming french morals, as well as for reforming french governance?
For reforming French morals, de Gouges proposed that men and women should be treated equally, with equal access to education and civil rights and she also advocated for the abolition of slavery. In terms of reforming French governance, de Gouges proposed that the French government should be more representative of the people, rather than a monarchy.
Olympe de Gouges was a French feminist and playwright who was active during the French Revolution. She advocated for women's rights, the abolition of slavery, and social and political reform. In her writings, she made a number of recommendations for reforming French morals and governance.
For reforming French morals, de Gouges called for greater equality between men and women, an end to arranged marriages, and the abolition of prostitution. She also advocated for greater access to education for women and for a more just and humane treatment of prisoners. In her 1790 pamphlet "Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen," de Gouges argued that women should have the same rights as men, including the right to participate in politics and hold public office.
In terms of reforming French governance, de Gouges called for a more democratic system of government that was accountable to the people. She believed that the government should be based on the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity and that all citizens should have equal rights and opportunities. She also called for an end to the monarchy and the establishment of a republic, as well as for the abolition of slavery and the death penalty.
Overall, de Gouges believed in a more just and equitable society that recognized the inherent rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their gender, social status, or ethnicity. While many of her recommendations were radical for the time, they helped to pave the way for future reforms in France and beyond.
Learn more about Olympe de Gouges:
https://brainly.com/question/9475214
#SPJ11
How did colonized societies respond to imperialism
Answer:
seconds) Search ResultsFeatured snippet from the webAs European and American imperialism continued around the world, non-western indegenous people of the lands being colonized would either fight the intruders or resign to modernizing their societies to western culture. Those who chose to fight were met with extremely violent military responses.
Explanation:
Answer: Some fought back against imperialism through armed resistance, while others used diplomatic means to try to protect their land and way of life. In some cases, indigenous peoples formed alliances with imperial powers in order to resist other imperial powers.
Consider what you know about economics, particularly the rules of supply and demand. Images A and B show information about the supply of books in Europe. Based on these images, what might be true about the demand for books in Europe at the start of the sixteenth century?
The posters demand popular books were during the sixteenth century in Europe. Everyone is working on their writing and printing projects.
What does the economic principle known as supply and demand entail?According to the law of supply and demand, prices will decrease if there is an excess of supply relative to demand for products or services. Prices will increase if demand outpaces supply. The price at which the supply and demand are in perfect balance is known as the equilibrium price in a free market.
How did the book market develop in Europe?The following strategies were used to satisfy the increased demand for books in Europe: European bookshops started exporting books to several nations. The locations where book fairs were held varied. making handwritten products.
To know more about economics visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/24838751
#SPJ1