The following shape is made up of 6 cubes. The volume of the shape is 384 cm³. If the
shape is dipped in paint then taken apart, what is the area of the unpainted surfaces?

The volume of the prism is determined as 63 cm³.

The volume of the triangular prism is calculated by applying the following formula as shown below;

V = ¹/₂bhl

where;

The volume of the prism is calculated as follows;

V = ¹/₂ x 7 cm x 3 cm x 6 cm

V = 63 cm³

,

Thus, the volume of the prism is a function of its base, height and length.

Learn more about volume of prism here: https://brainly.com/question/28795033

#SPJ1

The normal curve may be used to estimate the sampling distribution for alternatives (B) and (C) because they have sample sizes and population characteristics.

When the sample size is sufficient and the success probability (p) is not too near 0 or 1, the normal approximation to the binomial distribution can be employed.

The normal approximation is suitable, according to a widely accepted rule of thumb, when both np and n(1-p) are higher than or equal to 10.

Let's examine the available options:

If (A) n=15 and p=0.6, np=15 * 0.6 = 9, and n(1-p)=15 * 0.4 = 6, both are less than 10, preventing the adoption of the normal approximation.

When n=30 and p=0.3, the normal approximation may be employed since np=30 * 0.3 = 9 and n(1-p)=30 * 0.7 = 21 both are higher than or equal to 10.

When n=30 and p=0.6, the normal approximation may be employed since np=30 * 0.6 = 18 and n(1-p)=30 * 0.4 = 12 are both higher than or equal to 10.

(D) If n=15 and p=0.3, np=15*0.3 =4.5 and n(1-p)=15*0.7 =10.5, respectively; np is less than 10, therefore the typical approximation cannot be applied.

More about the normal distribution link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/12421652

#SPJ1

Answer:

x = 14

Step-by-step explanation:

using the cosine ratio in the right triangle and the exact value

cos30° = [tex]\frac{\sqrt{3} }{2}[/tex] , then

cos30° = [tex]\frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{7\sqrt{3} }{x}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{\sqrt{3} }{2}[/tex] ( cross- multiply )

x × [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] = 14[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] ( divide both sides by [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] )

x = 14

The product rule must be used to find the number of ways to form this committee.

To find the number of ways to form a committee consisting of one representative from each of the 50 states in the United States, where the representative from a state is either the governor or one of the two senators from that state, we  must use the product rule. This is because for each state, there are three choices (governor or one of the two senators), and these choices are made independently for all 50 states.

So, you simply multiply the number of choices for each state together:

3 choices per state × 50 states = 3⁵⁰ possible ways to form the committee.

To learn more about product: https://brainly.com/question/28457639

#SPJ11

The value of y for the solution set to the given system of equations is :

(e) y = -3

To use Cramer's rule, we need to find the determinant of the coefficient matrix and several other determinants obtained by replacing one column of the coefficient matrix with the constant terms. The coefficient matrix is:

{{-2, 3, -1}, {3, -1, 2}, {-2, 2, -1}}

The determinant of this matrix is:

|-2  3 -1|
| 3 -1  2|
|-2  2 -1| = -12

Now we replace the first column with the constants:

{{-2, 3, -1}, {-1, -1, 2}, {-1, 2, -1}}

The determinant of this matrix is:

|-2  3 -1|
|-1 -1  2|
|-1  2 -1| = 9

Next, we replace the second column with the constants:

{{-2, -2, -1}, {3, -1, 2}, {-2, -1, -1}}

The determinant of this matrix is:

|-2 -2 -1|
| 3 -1  2|
|-2 -1 -1| = 12

Finally, we replace the third column with the constants:

{{-2, 3, -2}, {3, -1, -1}, {-2, 2, -1}}

The determinant of this matrix is:

|-2  3 -2|
| 3 -1 -1|
|-2  2 -1| = -18

Now we can use Cramer's rule to find the value of y. The solution is:

y = D2 / D = 9 / (-12) = -3/4

Therefore, the answer is e) y = -3.

To learn more about Crammer's rule visit : https://brainly.com/question/20354529

#SPJ11

To compute the directional Gervative of the function f(x,y) = exy - x - 2y at the point P = (2,-1) in the direction of the vector v = , we first need to find the gradient of f at P.

The gradient of f is given by ∇f(x,y) = . So, at the point P = (2,-1), we have ∇f(2,-1) = .

Next, we need to find the unit vector in the direction of v. To do this, we first need to find the magnitude of v, which is ||v|| = √(e^2 + (-2)^2) = √(e^2 + 4).

Then, we can find the unit vector in the direction of v by dividing v by its magnitude:

u = v/||v|| = .

Finally, we can compute the directional Gervative of f at P in the direction of v as follows:

D_v f(2,-1) = ∇f(2,-1) · u = ( · )

= (e^-1 - 1)(e/√(e^2 + 4)) + (e^2 - 2)(-2/√(e^2 + 4))

= -2e/(√(e^2 + 4)) - 4/(√(e^2 + 4))

= (-2e - 4)/(√(e^2 + 4)).

Therefore, the directional Gervative of f at P in the direction of v is (-2e - 4)/(√(e^2 + 4)).

Learn more about :

gradient : brainly.com/question/13020257

#SPJ11

If you toss a fair coin repeatedly, the probability of getting a head in each individual toss is 1/2. Therefore, the probability of not getting a head in the first toss is 1/2, in the first two tosses is (1/2)^2, and so on. We can define the events An = {"no head in the first n tosses"}. The probability of An is (1/2)^n for any n.

Using the complement rule, we can say that the probability of getting a head in the first n tosses is 1 - (1/2)^n.
Now, we can consider the infinite sequence of events {A1, A2, A3, ...}. By the union bound, the probability of not getting a head in any of the tosses is the probability of An for all n.

This can be expressed as the infinite product of (1/2)^n, which is 0. Therefore, the probability of getting a head eventually is 1.

In simpler terms, even though the probability of getting a head on any individual toss is 1/2, if you keep tossing the coin, the probability of never getting a head decreases exponentially. So, with probability one, you will eventually get a head.

To know more about probability refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

To determine the probability of a student getting exactly 10 questions correct, we need to know the total number of ways in which the student can answer the questions and the number of ways in which the student can get exactly 10 questions correct.

Assuming that each question has only two possible answers (e.g. true/false or multiple choice with two options), and the student guesses randomly, the probability of getting a single question correct is 1/2, and the probability of getting a single question incorrect is also 1/2.

Let X be the number of questions the student answers correctly, and n be the total number of questions.

In this case, n = 20 (the total number of questions), and p = 1/2 (the probability of getting a single question correct).

where (n choose k) is the binomial coefficient, which represents the number of ways to choose k items from a set of n items, and is given by:

(n choose k) = n! / (k! * (n - k)!)

P(X = 10) = (20 choose 10) * (1/2)^10 * (1/2)^(20-10)

= 184,756 * 0.0009765625 * 0.0009765625

= 0.1801

Therefore, the probability of the student getting exactly 10 questions correct is 0.1801, or approximately 18.01%.

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

The series -2/3 - 4/4 + 6/5 + 8/6 - 10/7 + ... is divergent and the series is in the form ∑ [tex]bn = b1 + b2 + b3 + ...,[/tex]  where bn is the nth term of the series.

To distinguish bn, we need to compose the given series within the form:

[tex]bn = b1 + b2 + b3 + ...[/tex]

where bn is the nth term of the series.

Looking at the given arrangement, we see that the numerators of the terms are substituting indeed and odd integrability, beginning with 2 and expanding by 2 for each indeed term and diminishing by 1 for each odd term.

The denominators are basically the integers 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7, ...

So, ready to type in the nth term of the arrangement as:

[tex]bn = (-1)^{2} (n+1) * (2n - 1) / (n + 2)[/tex]

Presently, we are able to test for meeting or uniqueness utilizing the substituting arrangement test.

The rotating arrangement test states that on the off chance that an arrangement fulfills the taking-after conditions:

The terms substitute in sign.

The absolute esteem of each term is diminishing.

The constraint of the absolute esteem of the terms as n approaches boundlessness is zero.

At that point, the series converges.

In our case, the terms interchange in sign, and we are able to appear that the absolute value of each term is diminishing as takes after:

[tex]|bn+1| = (2n + 1) / (n + 3) < (2n - 1) / (n + 2) = |bn|[/tex]

So, the moment condition is fulfilled.

To appear that the third condition is fulfilled, we will take the restrain of the supreme value of bn as n approaches infinity:

lim (n→∞) |bn| = lim (n→∞) (2n - 1) / (n + 2) = 2

Since the constraint isn't zero, the rotating arrangement test does not apply, and we cannot conclude whether the arrangement merges or veers based on that test alone.

Instep, we will utilize the constrain comparison test. Let's compare our arrangement to the arrangement ∑(1/n) by taking the restrain of the proportion of the nth terms:

lim (n→∞) |bn| / (1/n) = lim (n→∞) n(2n - 1) / (n + 2)

Isolating the numerator and denominator by[tex]n^2,[/tex]we get:

lim (n→∞) |bn| / (1/n) = lim (n→∞) (2 - 1/n) / (1 + 2/n)

Since both the numerator and denominator approach constants as n approach infinity, we will take the limit as n approaches infinity directly and get:

lim (n→∞) |bn| / (1/n) = 2

This implies that our arrangement and the arrangement ∑(1/n) carry on additionally in the limit, and since the consonant arrangement ∑(1/n) diverges, able to conclude that our series also diverges by the limit comparison test.

Hence, the series -2/3 - 4/4 + 6/5 + 8/6 - 10/7 + ... diverges.

learn more about the divergence series

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ4

The correct answer is A. 3 mph. If Isaac's walking rate remains constant, so Isaac's walking rate is 3 mph

To find the Isaac's walking rate in miles per hour, we exactly need to divide the distance which he walks by the time it takes for him to walk that similar distance. We are given that the Isaac walks 6/10 of a mile in 1/5 of an hour, so:

Walking rate = distance ÷ time

Walking rate = (6/10) ÷ (1/5)

Walking rate = (6/10) x (5/1)

Walking rate = 3 miles per hour

Therefore, Isaac's walking rate is 3 mph.

Learn more about walking rate

https://brainly.com/question/30371402

#SPJ4

The first elementary row operation that should be performed is D. Replace row 4 with its sum with -3 times row 3. The second crude row operation that should be performed is C. Replace row 3 with its sum with 2 times row 2.

I understand you have provided an accompanying matrix representing a linear system, and you would like to know the first two elementary row operations to perform in solving the system. The matrix you provided appears to be incomplete or not properly formatted. However, I can still guide you on how to approach the problem.

When solving a linear system using an augmented matrix, you would generally perform the following steps:

1. Rearrange the rows, if necessary, so that the pivot (leading entry) in each row is 1 and positioned to the right of the pivot in the row above it.
2. Use row operations to create zeros below the pivots.
3. Use row operations to create zeros above the pivots.
4. Scale each row so that the pivot in each row is 1.

For the first row operation, you can either:
A. Interchange rows to position the pivots correctly, or
B. Scale a row by an integer or a simplified fraction so that the pivot is 1.

For the second row operation, you will most likely replace a row by its sum with a multiple of another row, so that there is a zero below the pivot. Without the correctly formatted matrix, it's difficult to provide a specific answer. However, I hope this general guidance helps you solve the given linear system.

Learn more about pivots here:- brainly.com/question/31261482

#SPJ11

The problem involves finding the area of a shaded region formed by two semicircles drawn on adjacent sides of a square. To solve this problem, we need to find the area of the square and subtract the area of the two semicircles from it.

To find the area of the square, we can simply square the length of its side which is given as 1 unit. So, the area of the square is 1 x 1 = 1 square unit.

Now, to find the area of the shaded region, we need to subtract the area of the two semicircles from the area of the square. The diameter of each semicircle is equal to the length of one of the sides of the square.

Thus, the radius of each semicircle is 1/2 units. Therefore, the area of one semicircle is (π/2) x (1/2)² = π/8 square units. Since there are two semicircles, the total area of the shaded region is (2 x π/8) = π/4 square units. Finally, we can subtract this area from the area of the square to obtain the area of the shaded region which is 1 - π/4 = (4-π)/4 square units.

To learn more about semicircles, click here:

brainly.com/question/29140521

#SPJ1`1

4, 6, and 8 are the three successive even numbers.

Call the smallest even integer "x" for simplicity. The following two even integers in succession would then be "x+2" and "x+4".

We may construct the following as an equation as the issue statement states that the product of the two smaller integers (x and x+2) is 16 greater than the largest integer (x+4):

x*(x+2) = (x+4) + 16

Extending the equation's left side results in:

x² + 2*x = x + 20

20 and x are subtracted from both sides to yield:

x² + x - 20 = 0

The factors of this quadratic equation are:

(x+5)(x-4) = 0

Consequently, x can have a value between -5 and 4. However, since we are aware that x must be an even number, the only viable answer is x = 4.

As a result, the three successive even integers are 4, 6, and 8; we can verify that this satisfies the initial requirement by checking that this:

4*6 = 24, which is 16 more than 8.

Learn about the Sum of Consecutive Odd Numbers:

https://brainly.com/question/29285392

a. For a 95% confidence interval based on n = 15 observations, the degrees of freedom is 14. The t-value is 2.145. b. For a 90% confidence interval from an SRS of 24 observations, the degrees of freedom is 23. Using Table D, the t-value is 1.713. c. For a 95% confidence interval from a sample of size 24, the degrees of freedom is 23. The t-value is 2.069.

To find the t-value for each situation, we need to know the degrees of freedom, which is equal to n-1. Using this information, we can look up the t-value on Table D or use software to find the appropriate value.

a. For a 95% confidence interval based on n = 15 observations, the degrees of freedom is 14. Using Table D, the t-value is 2.145.
b. For a 90% confidence interval from an SRS of 24 observations, the degrees of freedom is 23. Using Table D, the t-value is 1.713.
c. For a 95% confidence interval from a sample of size 24, the degrees of freedom is 23. Using Table D, the t-value is 2.069.

These cases illustrate that as the sample size increases, the t-value decreases, which in turn reduces the size of the margin of error. Additionally, as the confidence level increases, the t-value increases, which increases the size of the margin of error. It is important to note that the size of the margin of error is also affected by the variability of the data, represented by the standard deviation.

To find the t-values for calculating the margin of error for a confidence interval for the mean of the population in the given situations, you can use software or a t-table (Table D) with the appropriate degrees of freedom and confidence level.

a. For a 95% confidence interval based on n = 15 observations, the degrees of freedom are 15-1 = 14. From Table D, the t-value (t*) is approximately 2.145.

b. For a 90% confidence interval from an SRS of 24 observations, the degrees of freedom are 24-1 = 23. From Table D, the t-value (t*) is approximately 1.714.

c. For a 95% confidence interval from a sample of size 24, the degrees of freedom are 24-1 = 23. From Table D, the t-value (t*) is approximately 2.069.

d. These cases illustrate that the size of the margin of error depends on the confidence level and the sample size. As the confidence level increases, the margin of error increases, and as the sample size increases, the margin of error decreases. This is because a higher confidence level requires a larger margin to ensure the true population mean falls within the interval, while a larger sample size provides more accurate estimates, reducing the margin of error.

Learn more about confidence interval at: brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The p-value of the test statistic is 0.0512

We can conduct a hypothesis test for the proportion using a z-test.

The null hypothesis is that the proportion of readers who own a particular make of car is equal to 70%:

H0: p = 0.7

The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion is different from 70%:

Ha: p ≠ 0.7

The test statistic is calculated as:

z = (p' - p) / sqrt(p*(1-p)/n)

where p' is the sample proportion, p is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis, and n is the sample size.

Plugging in the values from the problem, we get:

z = (0.64 - 0.7) / sqrt(0.7*(1-0.7)/200) = -1.96

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the probability of getting a z-score of -1.96 or lower (or 1.96 or higher) is 0.0256. Since this is a two-tailed test, we double the probability to get the p-value:

p-value = 2*0.0256 = 0.0512

Therefore, the p-value of the test statistic is 0.0512, rounded to four decimal places.

Since the p-value is greater than the commonly used significance level of 0.05, we do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of readers who own a particular make of car is different from 70%.

Learn more about z test at https://brainly.com/question/14269947

#SPJ11

The mass of a thin plate with varying density δ(x,y) occupying a region D in the plane xy is given by the double integral over D of δ(x,y) dA, where dA is an element of area in D.The mass of the plate is 21 units.

In this case, the plate covers the triangular region bounded by the x-axis and the lines x=1 and y=2x in the first quadrant, and the density of the plate is δ(x,y) = 6x + 6y + 6. Therefore, the mass of the plate is given by the double integral over the triangular region of (6x + 6y + 6) dA.

To evaluate this integral, we can use iterated integrals. First, we integrate with respect to y, keeping x constant:

∫[0,1] ∫[0,2x] (6x + 6y + 6) dy dx

This simplifies to:

∫[0,1] (18x + 12) dx

Integrating with respect to x, we get:

[tex](9x^2 + 12x) |_0^1 = 21[/tex]

Therefore, the mass of the plate is 21 units.

To know more about integral , refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31529643#

#SPJ11

1. There is no solution.

2. The two positive numbers with product 200 such that the sum of one number and twice the second number is as small as possible are 40 and 5.

3. The length and width of the rectangle should be 25 cm and 50 cm, respectively, so that the area is a maximum.

1. Let the two numbers be x and y, where x > y. We have the equation:

x - y = 250

This can be rearranged to give:

x = y + 250

The product of the two numbers is given by:

P = xy = y(y + 250) = y^2 + 250y

To find the minimum value of P, we take the derivative with respect to y and set it equal to zero:

dP/dy = 2y + 250 = 0

Solving for y, we get:

y = -125

Since we require positive numbers, this is not a valid solution. Therefore, we take the second derivative:

d^2P/dy^2 = 2 > 0

This confirms that we have a minimum. To find the corresponding value of x, we use the equation x = y + 250:

x = -125 + 250 = 125

Therefore, the two numbers are 125 and -125, but since we require positive numbers, there is no solution.

2. Let the two numbers be x and y, where x > y. We are given that:

xy = 200

We want to minimize the expression:

x + 2y

We can solve for one variable in terms of the other:

x = 200/y

Substituting into the expression to be minimized, we get:

x + 2y = 200/y + 2y = 200/y + 4y/2 = 200/y + 2y^2/y

Simplifying, we get:

x + 2y = (200 + 2y^2)/y

To minimize this expression, we take the derivative with respect to y and set it equal to zero:

d/dy (200 + 2y^2)/y = -200/y^2 + 4y/y^2 = 4y/y^2 - 200/y^2 = 0

Solving for y, we get:

y = 5

Substituting back into the equation xy = 200, we get:

x = 40

Therefore, the two positive numbers with product 200 such that the sum of one number and twice the second number is as small as possible are 40 and 5.

3. Let the length and width of the rectangle be x and y, respectively. We are given that the perimeter is 100, so:

2x + 2y = 100

Solving for y, we get:

y = 50 - x

The area of the rectangle is given by:

A = xy = x(50 - x)

To maximize this expression, we take the derivative with respect to x and set it equal to zero:

dA/dx = 50 - 2x = 0

Solving for x, we get:

x = 25

Substituting back into the equation y = 50 - x, we get:

y = 25

Therefore, the length and width of the rectangle should be 25 cm and 50 cm, respectively, so that the area is a maximum.

Learn more about "length":

https://brainly.com/question/24487155

#SPJ11

Since the difference is negative (-8), the sequence is monotonic decreasing.

A monotonic function in mathematics is a function between ordered sets that maintains or flips the given order. Calculus was where this idea initially surfaced, and it was later applied to the more abstract context of order theory.  If the variables Yj can be arranged so that if Yj is missing, then all variables Yk with k>j are likewise missing, then the pattern of missing data is said to be monotone.

This happens, for instance, in drop-out-prone longitudinal research. The pattern is said to as non-monotone or generic if it is not monotonous.

Using the difference test to calculate the nth term of the sequence, we get:

[tex]a_n - a_{n-1} \\= 6 - 8n - (6 - 8(n-1)) \\= -8[/tex]

Since the difference is negative (-8), the sequence is monotone decreasing.

Learn more about monotonic Visit: brainly.com/question/30627393

#SPJ4

The calculated value of the measure of the angle V is 81 degrees

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Because the triangle ERT is congruent to triangle CVB, then we have

E = C

So, we have

7x + 4 = 32

Evaluate the like terms

7x = 28

Divide by 7

x = 4

Also, we have

V = R

This means that

V = 180 - C - B

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

V = 180 - 7x - 4 - 15x - 7

So, we have

V = 180 - 7(4) - 4 - 15(4) - 7

Evaluate

V = 81

Hence, the measure of the angle is 81 degrees

Read more about angles at

https://brainly.com/question/25716982

#SPJ1

Therefore, the correct is: 2 sin(3πft) where f' is the cut-off frequency of the low-pass filter.

The sampling interval is T = 0.5 seconds, since there are two samples per second.

The Nyquist frequency is equal to half of the sampling frequency, or f_Nyquist = 1 / (2T) = 1 Hz. Since the frequency of the original signal is 2rf = 2(2πf) = 4πf, which is greater than the Nyquist frequency, the signal will be aliased.

The aliased signal can be obtained by subtracting the Nyquist frequency from the original frequency, which gives 4πf - 2πf_Nyquist = 4πf - π = 3πf. Therefore, the aliased signal has frequency 3πf.

The sampled signal can be expressed as:

x(nT) = 2 sin(2πfnT)

where n is an integer representing the sample number. The recovered signal can be obtained by applying a low-pass filter to this signal to remove the high-frequency component due to aliasing. The cut-off frequency of the filter should be less than or equal to the Nyquist frequency to ensure that no aliasing occurs.

The recovered signal can be expressed as:

x_recovered(t) = 2 sin(2πf' t)

where f' is the cut-off frequency of the low-pass filter. Since the original signal has frequency 4πf, the recovered signal should have frequency 3πf to avoid aliasing.

To know more about frequency,

https://brainly.com/question/29593379

#SPJ11

Complete question:

The signal is in blue, is sampled regularly, with the red dots indicating the sample values. what is the signal that will be recovered from the sample values?

It is proved that AK = LA when two distinct nonparallel lines k  and l are tangent to C(0,r).

Since k and l are nonparallel, they must intersect at some point P. Let Q be the center of the circle C(0,r). Then, by the tangent-chord angle theorem, we have:

∠AKP = 90°   (since k is tangent to the circle at K)

∠ALP = 90°   (since l is tangent to the circle at L)

Also, by the angle between intersecting lines, we have:

∠KPL = ∠APK + ∠APL

Since k and l are tangent to the circle at K and L, respectively, we have:

∠KQL = ∠PQK = 90°   (tangent-chord angle theorem)

∠LQK = ∠PQL = 90°   (tangent-chord angle theorem)

Therefore, quadrilateral KQLP is a rectangle, and we have:

∠KPL = 180° - ∠KQL - ∠LQK = 180° - 90° - 90° = 0°

This means that points K, P, and L are collinear, so we can write:

KP + PL = KL

Since k and l are tangent to the circle, we have:

KP = PL = r

Therefore, we have:

AK + AL = KL = 2r

It remains to show that AK = AL. Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that AK ≠ AL. Without loss of generality, assume that AK < AL. Then we have:

AK + AL = 2AK + (AL - AK) < 2AL = KL

This contradicts the fact that AK + AL = KL, so our assumption must be false. Therefore, we conclude that AK = AL.

Learn more about "circle ":

https://brainly.com/question/24375372

#SPJ11

The number of sharks found between 76 m depth and 100 m depth is 2.04 shark's population.

The number of sharks found at different depths is calculated as follows;

From the histogram, the population of the fish at depth between 76 m and 100 m can be read off by tracing the depth values towards the frequency axis;

at depth 76 m, the frequency = 1.5

at depth 100 m, the frequency = 0.54

Total number of fish between the depths = 1.5 + 0.54 = 2.04

Thus, this value represents the density of the sharks between 76 m and 100 m.

Learn more about density of population here: https://brainly.com/question/13902749

#SPJ1

The requreid local baseball team sold 99 adult tickets, 66 child tickets, and 22 senior tickets for the game.

Let A, C, and S represent the number of adult, child, and senior tickets sold, respectively.

A + C + S = 187 (the total number of tickets sold)

A:C = 3:2 (the ratio of adult to child tickets)

A:S = 9:2 (the ratio of adult to senior tickets)

We can use the ratios to write:

A = 3x (where x is a common factor)

C = 2x

S = (2/9)A = (2/9)(3x) = (2/3)x

Now we can substitute these expressions into the first equation:

A + C + S = 3x + 2x + (2/3)x = (9/3)x + (6/3)x + (2/3)x = 17x/3 = 187

x = 187(3/17) ≈ 33

Therefore, we can find the number of adults, children, and senior tickets sold by multiplying x by the appropriate ratio factors:

A = 3x ≈ 99

C = 2x ≈ 66

S = (2/3)x ≈ 22

Learn more about ratios here:

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ1

Here's a proof for each of the statements you provided.

a) If g∘f = I_A, then f is an injection.
Proof: Assume x1 and x2 are elements of A such that f(x1) = f(x2). We want to show that x1 = x2. Since g∘f = I_A, we have g(f(x1)) = g(f(x2)). Applying I_A, we get x1 = g(f(x1)) = g(f(x2)) = x2. Thus, f is injective.

b) If f∘g = I_B, then f is a surjection.
Proof: Let y be an element of B. We want to show that there exists an element x in A such that f(x) = y. Since f∘g = I_B, we have f(g(y)) = I_B(y) = y. Thus, there exists an element x = g(y) in A such that f(x) = y. Therefore, f is surjective.

c) If g∘f = I_A and f∘g = I_B, then f and g are bijections and g = f^(-1).
Proof: From parts (a) and (b), we know that f is both injective and surjective, which means f is a bijection. Similarly, g is also a bijection. Now, we need to show that g = f^(-1). By definition, f^(-1)∘f = I_A and f∘f^(-1) = I_B. Since g∘f = I_A and f∘g = I_B, it follows that g = f^(-1).

To learn more about element visit;

https://brainly.com/question/24407115

#SPJ11

Using the intermediate value theorem and Rolle's theorem, we showed that the function [tex]f(x) = ln(x^{2} ) - x + 2[/tex] has exactly one zero on the interval [4,6], which is x = 2.

To show that the function [tex]f(x) = ln(x^{2} ) - x + 2[/tex] has exactly one zero on the interval [4,6], we need to use the intermediate value theorem and Rolle's theorem.

First, we can find that the function is continuous and differentiable for x > 0. Taking the derivative of f(x), we get [tex]f'(x) = (2/x) - 1[/tex]. Setting f'(x) = 0, we get x = 2.

Now, let's evaluate f(4) and f(6). We have [tex]f(4) = ln(16) - 4 + 2 = ln(16) - 2[/tex]and [tex]f(6) = ln(36) - 6 + 2 = ln(36) - 4[/tex]. Using a calculator, we find that f(4) < 0 and f(6) > 0.

By the intermediate value theorem, since f(x) is continuous on [4,6] and takes on values of opposite signs at the endpoints, there exists at least one zero of f(x) on the interval.

Finally, to show that there is only one zero, we use Rolle's theorem. Since f(x) is differentiable on (4,6) and has a zero on this interval, there must exist at least one point c in (4,6) such that f'(c) = 0.

From earlier, we know that f'(x) = (2/x) - 1, so we have [tex]f'(c) = (2/c) - 1 = 0[/tex], which implies c = 2. Therefore, the only zero of f(x) on [4,6] is x = 2.

In summary, using the intermediate value theorem and Rolle's theorem, we showed that the function [tex]f(x) = ln(x^{2} ) - x + 2[/tex] has exactly one zero on the interval [4,6], which is x = 2.

To know more about Rolle's theorem refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31331894#

#SPJ11

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

give me brainliest porfavor

Using the equation

92001 - 1600 x n(t) x 4 + t

A)

There will be about 9041 infected people by the end of the 6th month.

B)

There are no 6400 infected people according to this model.

C)

There will not be more than 8800 infected people.

We have,

(a)

To find the number of people infected by the end of the 6th month, we need to substitute t = 6 into the formula.

= 92001 - 1600 n(6) 4+6

= 92001 - 1600 n(6) 10

= 92001 - 160000

= 9041

(b)

To find the time when there are 6400 infected people, we need to solve the equation:

92001 - 1600 n(t) 4+t = 6400

1600 n(t) 4+t = 85601

n(t) = 85601 / (1600 (4+t))

We need to solve for t when n(t) = 6400:

6400 = 85601 / (1600 (4+t))

4+t = 85601 / (6400 × 1600) ≈ 0.84

t ≈ 0.84 - 4 ≈ -3.16

Since time cannot be negative, we can conclude that there are no 6400 infected people according to this model.

(c)

We need to find if n(t) > 8800 for all t > 0. We can check by evaluating n(t) at t = 0 and at a large value of t.

n(0) = 92001 - 1600 × 0 × 4+0 = 92001

n(100) = 92001 - 1600 × 100 × 4+100 = - 639999

Since n(100) is negative, we can conclude that according to this model, there will not be more than 8800 infected people.

Thus,

A)

There will be about 9041 infected people by the end of the 6th month.

B)

There are no 6400 infected people according to this model.

C)

There will not be more than 8800 infected people.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/17194269

#SPJ1