the alexander family and the chen family each used their sprinklers last summer. the water output rate for the alexander family's sprinkler was 30l per hour. the water output rate for the chen family's sprinkler was 40l per hour. the families used their sprinklers for a combined total of 65 hours, resulting in a total water output of 2250l. how long was each sprinkler used?

Step-by-step explanation:

Amy’s field is bounded by a 1.8 km stretch of river to the west and a 1200 m section of road to the east.

The northern boundary is 2300m long. To the south, the field has a 1.1km wall and 0.7km hedge.

Amy is going to put a fence around this field. How long will the fence need to be?

a)7.1 km

b)13.4 km

c)38.6 km

d)Not enough information.

correct answer is d 38.6

To determine the formula for the charge in cents for a telephone call between two cities lasting n minutes, n greater than 3,

if the charge for the first 3 minutes is $1.20 and each additional minute costs 33 cents, we can follow the steps below: We can start by subtracting the charge for the first 3 minutes from the total charge for the n minutes.

Since the charge for the first 3 minutes is $1.20, the charge for the remaining n-3 minutes is:$(n-3) \times 0.33Then, we can add the charge for the first 3 minutes to the charge for the remaining n-3 minutes to get the total charge:$(n-3) \times 0.33 + 1.20$

Therefore, the formula for the charge in cents for a telephone call between two cities lasting n minutes, n greater than 3, if the charge for the first 3 minutes is $1.20 and each additional minute costs 33 cents is given by:Charge = $(n-3) \times 0.33 + 1.20$

This formula gives the total charge for a call that lasts for n minutes, including the charge for the first 3 minutes. It is valid only for values of n greater than 3.A 250-word answer should not be necessary to explain the formula for the charge in cents for a telephone call between two cities lasting n minutes, n greater than 3, if the charge for the first 3 minutes is $1.20 and each additional minute costs 33 cents.

To know more about costs, click here

https://brainly.com/question/17120857

#SPJ11

Answer:

Her total score is 65.

Step-by-step explanation:

Out of 20 questions, Rita get 15 correct answer.

Riya get = 20-15=5 wrong answers.

according to the question,

5 marks awarded for each correct answer and 2 marks deducted for each wrong answer.

so, her total score = (15 * 5 = 75) - (5 * 2 =10)

= 75 - 10 =65

: therefore, her total score is 65.

Answer:

Riya's total score is 65/100

Step-by-step explanation:

You can calculate the total score for a class test by using the following formula:

(Let t = total score)

In our case, if Riya got 15 correct answers out of 20 questions, then she got 5 wrong answers (20 - 15 = 5).

If each question is worth 5 marks for a correct answer and 2 marks for a wrong answer, we can plug in the numbers into the formula:

Solving what is inside of the parenthesis gives us:

Therefore, Riya’s total score is 65 out of a possible 100.

Answer:length 16 cm breath 6 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's assume the breadth of the rectangle is "x" cm.

According to the given information, the length of the rectangle exceeds twice its breadth by 4 cm. So, the length can be expressed as 2x + 4 cm.

The perimeter of a rectangle is given by the formula: Perimeter = 2(length + breadth).

Substituting the values we have, the perimeter of the rectangle is:

44 cm = 2((2x + 4) + x)

Now, we can solve this equation to find the value of x:

44 cm = 2(3x + 4)

44 cm = 6x + 8

6x = 44 - 8

6x = 36

x = 36/6

x = 6

So, the breadth of the rectangle is 6 cm.

To find the length, we substitute the value of x back into the expression for length:

Length = 2x + 4

Length = 2(6) + 4

Length = 12 + 4

Length = 16 cm

Therefore, the length of the rectangle is 16 cm and the breadth is 6 cm.

Using the method of undetermined coefficients, one solution of the given differential equation is y = A cos(8t) + B sin(8t) + C e²t, where A, B, and C are constants.

To find a particular solution using the method of undetermined coefficients, we assume a solution of the form y = A cos(8t) + B sin(8t) + C e²t, where A, B, and C are undetermined coefficients to be determined.

We differentiate y to find y' and substitute the expressions into the given differential equation − 4y' + 67y = 80e²¹ cos(8t) + 32e²¹ sin(8t) + 9e²t. By comparing the coefficients of the trigonometric and exponential terms on both sides of the equation, we can solve for A, B, and C.

After determining the values of A, B, and C, we substitute them back into the assumed solution y = A cos(8t) + B sin(8t) + C e²t. This gives us one particular solution of the differential equation.

It's important to note that the method of undetermined coefficients may not work in all cases, especially when the non-homogeneous term has a similar form to the complementary solution. In such cases, variations of parameters or other techniques may be required.

Learn more about Coefficients,

brainly.com/question/1594145

#SPJ11

The value of y! y÷(−3/4)=3 1/2 is  -21/8.

Let solve the value of y by multiplying both sides of the equation by (-3/4).

y / (-3/4) = 3 1/2

Multiply each sides by (-3/4):

y = (3 1/2) * (-3/4)

Convert the mixed number 3 1/2 into an improper fraction:

3 1/2 = (2 * 3 + 1) / 2 = 7/2

Substitute

y = (7/2) * (-3/4)

Multiply the numerators and denominators:

y = (7 * -3) / (2 * 4)

y = -21/8

Therefore the value of y is -21/8.

Learn more about value of y here:https://brainly.com/question/25916072

#SPJ4

Answer:  SAS

Step-by-step explanation:

The angles in the midle of the triangles are equal because of vertical angle theorem that says when you have 2 intersecting lines the angles are equal.  So they have said a Side, and Angle and a Side are equal so the triangles are congruent due to SAS

Answer:

SAS

Step-by-step explanation:

The angles in the middle of the triangles are equal because of the vertical angle theorem that says when you have 2 intersecting lines the angle are equal. So they have expressed a Side, and Angle and a Side are identical so the triangles are congruent due to SAS

The value of angle T (m<T) would be = 30°. That is option A.

To calculate the value of the missing angle, the following steps should be taken as follows;

The total internal angle of a triangle = 180°

That is ;

180° = 4x-6+6x+11+85

= 10x-6+11+85

= 10x+90

10x = 180-90

X = 90/10

= 9

Therefore, T = 4x-6

= 4(9)-6 = 30°

Learn more about triangle here:

https://brainly.com/question/28470545

#SPJ1

The symbolic form of the compound statement "You're here, but I'm not there" is q ∧ ¬p.

In symbolic logic, we use symbols to represent simple statements and logical connectives to express compound statements. The given compound statement states "You're here, but I'm not there." Let's assign p as the statement "I'm there" and q as the statement "You're here."

To represent the compound statement symbolically, we use the logical connective ∧ (conjunction) to denote "but." The symbol ¬ (negation) represents "not." Therefore, the symbolic form of the compound statement is q ∧ ¬p, which translates to "You're here, but I'm not there."

In this symbolic representation, the ∧ symbolizes the logical conjunction, indicating that both q and ¬p must be true for the compound statement to be true. q represents "You're here," and ¬p represents "I'm not there." So, the symbolic form accurately captures the meaning of the original statement.

Learn more about Symbolic logic

brainly.com/question/30195021

#SPJ11

To find the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) for the parameters μ and λ of the inverse Gaussian distribution in R, you can use the optimization functions available in the stats4 package.

Here are the steps to solve this in RStudio:

Install and load the stats4 package:

install.packages("stats4")

library(stats4)

Define the log-likelihood function for the inverse Gaussian distribution:

log_likelihood <- function(parameters, x) {

 mu <- parameters[1]

 lambda <- parameters[2]

 n <- length(x)  

 sum_term <- sum((x - mu)^2 / (mu^2 * x) - log(2 * pi * x * lambda) - (x - mu)^2 / (2 * mu^2 * lambda^2))

   return(-n * log(lambda) - n * mu / lambda + sum_term)

}

Generate a random sample or use the observed data:

x <- c(x1, x2, ..., xn)  # Replace with the observed data

Define the negative log-likelihood function for optimization:

negative_log_likelihood <- function(parameters) {

 return(-log_likelihood(parameters, x))

Use the mle function to find the MLE:

start_values <- c(1, 1)  # Provide initial values for the parameters

result <- mle(negative_log_likelihood, start = start_values)

mle_estimate <- coef(result)

The MLE for μ is given by mle_estimate[1] and the MLE for λ is given by mle_estimate[2].

Note: Make sure to replace x1, x2, ..., xn with the actual observed data values and provide appropriate initial values for the parameters in start_values.

Learn more about Gaussian here

https://brainly.com/question/30528045

#SPJ11

The possible rational canonical forms for the given matrix A are:-
1.
[ 1 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 0 -1 0 ]
[ 0 0 0 -1 ]
2.
[ -1 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 -1 0 0 ]
[ 0 0 1 0 ]
[ 0 0 0 1 ]

Let A be a 4x4 matrix over R with characteristic polynomial (x^4-1) and minimal polynomial (x^2-1). To find all possible rational canonical forms, we need to consider the elementary divisors of the matrix A.

The characteristic polynomial gives us the information about the eigenvalues of the matrix A. In this case, the eigenvalues are the roots of the characteristic polynomial, which are 1, -1, i, and -i. Since the minimal polynomial divides the characteristic polynomial, the eigenvalues of the matrix A must satisfy the minimal polynomial as well.

The minimal polynomial, (x^2-1), implies that the eigenvalues of A must be either 1 or -1. Therefore, the eigenvalues i and -i are not valid eigenvalues for this matrix.

Now, let's consider the possible rational canonical forms based on the eigenvalues.

Case 1: Eigenvalue 1
In this case, the Jordan canonical form will have a 2x2 Jordan block corresponding to the eigenvalue 1.

Case 2: Eigenvalue -1
Similar to case 1, the Jordan canonical form will have a 2x2 Jordan block corresponding to the eigenvalue -1.

Hence, the possible rational canonical forms for the given matrix A are:

1.
[ 1 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 0 -1 0 ]
[ 0 0 0 -1 ]

2.
[ -1 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 -1 0 0 ]
[ 0 0 1 0 ]
[ 0 0 0 1 ]

These two forms correspond to the two possible ways of organizing the Jordan blocks for the given eigenvalues.

To learn more about "Canonical forms" visit: https://brainly.com/question/30575036

#SPJ11

The value of the expression g(f(x)) in terms of x^2 is -x^2+4. So, the answer is (-x^2+4)

Given functions are,

f(x) = -x^2 - 1 and

g(x) = x + 5.

We need to calculate g(f(x)) in terms of x^2.

So, we can write g(f(x)) = g(-x^2 - 1)

= -x^2 - 1 + 5

= -x^2 + 4

Therefore, the value of the expression g(f(x)) in terms of x^2 is -x^2+4

So, the answer is -x^2+4

Learn more about functions visit:

brainly.com/question/31062578

#SPJ11

Brad and Chanya share some apples in the ratio 3 : 5. Chanya gets 4 more apples than Brad gets. Brad gets 6 apples.

Let's assume that Brad gets \(3x\) apples and Chanya gets \(5x\) apples, where \(x\) is a common multiplier.

According to the given information, Chanya gets 4 more apples than Brad. So, we can write the equation:

\[5x = 3x + 4.\]

To find the number of apples Brad gets, we solve this equation for \(x\):

\[5x - 3x = 4,\]

\[2x = 4,\]

\[x = 2.\]

Now we can calculate the number of apples Brad gets by substituting \(x = 2\) into the expression \(3x\):

Brad gets \(3 \times 2 = 6\) apples.

Learn more about apples here :-

https://brainly.com/question/18371057

#SPJ11

The function has a relative minimum at (2, 2, 0) and a saddle point at (0, 0, 8).

The function f(x, y) = x³ - 6xy + y³ + 8 is given, and we need to determine the relative extrema and saddle points of this function.

To find the relative extrema and saddle points, we need to calculate the partial derivatives of the function with respect to x and y. Let's denote the partial derivative with respect to x as f_x and the partial derivative with respect to y as f_y.

1. Calculate f_x:
To find f_x, we differentiate f(x, y) with respect to x while treating y as a constant.

f_x = d/dx(x³ - 6xy + y³ + 8)
    = 3x² - 6y

2. Calculate f_y:
To find f_y, we differentiate f(x, y) with respect to y while treating x as a constant.

f_y = d/dy(x³ - 6xy + y³ + 8)
    = -6x + 3y²

3. Set f_x and f_y equal to zero to find critical points:
To find the critical points, we need to set both f_x and f_y equal to zero and solve for x and y.

Setting f_x = 3x² - 6y = 0, we get 3x² = 6y, which gives us x² = 2y.

Setting f_y = -6x + 3y² = 0, we get -6x = -3y², which gives us x = (1/2)y².

Solving the system of equations x² = 2y and x = (1/2)y², we find two critical points: (0, 0) and (2, 2).

4. Classify the critical points:
To determine the nature of the critical points, we can use the second partial derivatives test. This involves calculating the second partial derivatives f_xx, f_yy, and f_xy.

f_xx = d²/dx²(3x² - 6y) = 6
f_yy = d²/dy²(-6x + 3y²) = 6y
f_xy = d²/dxdy(3x² - 6y) = 0

At the critical point (0, 0):
f_xx = 6, f_yy = 0, and f_xy = 0.
Since f_xx > 0 and f_xx * f_yy - f_xy² = 0 * 0 - 0² = 0, the second partial derivatives test is inconclusive.

At the critical point (2, 2):
f_xx = 6, f_yy = 12, and f_xy = 0.
Since f_xx > 0 and f_xx * f_yy - f_xy² = 6 * 12 - 0² = 72 > 0, the second partial derivatives test confirms that (2, 2) is a relative minimum.

Therefore, the relative minimum is (2, 2, 0).

To determine if there are any saddle points, we need to examine the behavior of the function around the critical points.

At (0, 0), we have f(0, 0) = 8. This means that (0, 0, 8) is a relative minimum.

At (2, 2), we have f(2, 2) = 0. This means that (2, 2, 0) is a saddle point.

In conclusion, the function f(x, y) = x³ - 6xy + y³ + 8 has a relative minimum at (2, 2, 0) and a saddle point at (0, 0, 8).

To know more about function, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/32357666#

#SPJ11

Yes, the remodelling should be carried out.

The decision to remodel the sporting goods store should be based on the net present value (NPV) of the project. To calculate the NPV, we need to discount the expected cash flows to their present value using the given interest rate of 12.5% compounded monthly.

Step 1: Calculate the present value of the cash inflows.

For the first 4 years, the net profit increase is $8,000 per year. Using the formula for the present value of an annuity, we can calculate the present value of this cash flow:

PV1 = 8000 * (1 - (1 + 0.125/12)^(-12*4)) / (0.125/12) ≈ $27,633.29

For the next 6 years, the net profit increase is $10,000 per year. Similarly, we can calculate the present value of this cash flow:

PV2 = 10000 * (1 - (1 + 0.125/12)^(-12*6)) / (0.125/12) ≈ $46,078.56

Step 2: Calculate the present value of the salvage value.

To calculate the present value of the salvage value after 10 years, we can use the formula for the future value of a lump sum:

PV3 = 40000 / (1 + 0.125/12)^(12*10) ≈ $16,091.02

Step 3: Calculate the NPV.

The NPV is the sum of the present values of the cash inflows minus the cost of remodeling:

NPV = PV1 + PV2 + PV3 - 60000

   ≈ 27633.29 + 46078.56 + 16091.02 - 60000

   ≈ $29,802.87

Therefore, the NPV of the remodeling project is approximately $29,802.87, which is positive. A positive NPV indicates that the project is expected to generate a return higher than the discount rate, and therefore, the remodeling should be carried out.

Learn more about remodelling

brainly.com/question/30763314

#SPJ11

Answer:

A straight line.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]3y = -2x + 12[/tex] on a coordinate plane is a line having slope [tex]\frac{-2}{3}[/tex] and y-intercept  [tex](0,4)[/tex] .

Firstly we try to find the slope-intercept form: [tex]y = mx+c[/tex]

m = slope

c = y-intercept

We have,   [tex]3y = -2x + 12[/tex]

=> [tex]y = \frac{-2x+12}{3}[/tex]

=> [tex]y = \frac{-2}{3} x +\frac{12}{3}[/tex]

=> [tex]y = \frac{-2}{3} x +4[/tex]

Hence, by the slope-intercept form, we have

m = slope = [tex]\frac{-2}{3}[/tex]

c = y-intercept = [tex]4[/tex]

Now we pick two points to define a line: say [tex]x = 0[/tex] and [tex]x=3[/tex]

When  [tex]x = 0[/tex] we have [tex]y=4[/tex]

When  [tex]x = 3[/tex] we have [tex]y=2[/tex]

Hence,  [tex]3y = -2x + 12[/tex] on a coordinate plane is a line having slope [tex]\frac{-2}{3}[/tex] and y-intercept  [tex](0,4)[/tex] .

To learn more about slope-intercept form:

https://brainly.com/question/1884491

To express these results in terms of the standard basis for R⁴, we can write:

T(1) = 1 * (1, 0, 0, 0)

T(t) = 1 * (1, 0, 0, 0) + (-1) * (0, 1, 0, 0) = (1, -1, 0, 0)

T(t²) = 1 * (1, 0, 0, 0) + 3 * (0, 1, 0, 0) + 1 * (0, 0, 1, 0) = (1, 3, 1, 0)

T(t³) = 1 * (1, 0, 0

a. To show that T is a linear transformation, we need to demonstrate that it satisfies the two properties of linearity: additive and scalar multiplication preservation.

Additive property:

Let p, q be two polynomials in P and c be a scalar. We need to show that T(p + q) = T(p) + T(q).

Let p(t) = a + a₁t + a₂t² + αzt³ and q(t) = b + b₁t + b₂t² + βzt³.

T(p + q) = T((a + a₁t + a₂t² + αzt³) + (b + b₁t + b₂t² + βzt³))

= T((a + b) + (a₁ + b₁)t + (a₂ + b₂)t² + (αz + βz)t³)

= (a + b) + (a₁ + b₁)t + (a₂ + b₂)t² + (αz + βz)t³

= (a + a₁t + a₂t² + αzt³) + (b + b₁t + b₂t² + βzt³)

= T(p) + T(q).

Scalar multiplication preservation:

Let p be a polynomial in P and c be a scalar. We need to show that T(c * p) = c * T(p).

Let p(t) = a + a₁t + a₂t² + αzt³.

T(c * p) = T(c(a + a₁t + a₂t² + αzt³))

= T(ca + ca₁t + ca₂t² + cαzt³)

= ca + ca₁t + ca₂t² + cαzt³

= c(a + a₁t + a₂t² + αzt³)

= c * T(p).

Since T satisfies both the additive and scalar multiplication properties, T is a linear transformation.

b. The zero vector in the domain of T corresponds to the zero polynomial, which is p(t) = 0. Graphically, the zero polynomial represents the x-axis (y = 0) in the coordinate plane.

c. Two vectors in the domain of T that are scalar multiples are p₁(t) = t and p₂(t) = 2t. Both p₁(t) and p₂(t) are multiples of the polynomial p₃(t) = t.

d. To find the matrix for T relative to the given bases, we apply T to each basis vector and express the results as linear combinations of the basis vectors in the range.

T(1) = 1

T(t) = t - 1

T(t²) = t² + 3t + 1

T(t³) = t³ - 2t² + t

To express these results in terms of the standard basis for R⁴, we can write:

T(1) = 1 * (1, 0, 0, 0)

T(t) = 1 * (1, 0, 0, 0) + (-1) * (0, 1, 0, 0) = (1, -1, 0, 0)

T(t²) = 1 * (1, 0, 0, 0) + 3 * (0, 1, 0, 0) + 1 * (0, 0, 1, 0) = (1, 3, 1, 0)

T(t³) = 1 * (1, 0, 0

to learn more about polynomial.

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ11

Alright, let's take this step by step.

First, let's understand what an ordinary annuity is. An ordinary annuity is a series of equal payments made at the end of consecutive periods over a fixed length of time. For example, if you save $100 every year for 5 years, that’s an ordinary annuity.

Now, let’s understand the formula to calculate the future value (FV) of an ordinary annuity:

FV = P x ((1 + r)^n - 1) / r

Where:

- FV is the future value of the annuity.

- P is the payment per period (how much you save each time).

- r is the interest rate per period (in decimal form).

- n is the number of periods (how many times you save).

Let’s solve each part:

a) $500 per year for 6 years at 8%.

P = 500, r = 8% = 0.08, n = 6

FV = 500 x ((1 + 0.08)^6 - 1) / 0.08

  ≈ 500 x (1.59385 - 1) / 0.08

  ≈ 500 x (0.59385) / 0.08

  ≈ 500 x 7.4231

  ≈ 3701.55

So, the future value of $500 per year for 6 years at 8% is about $3,701.55.

b) $250 per year for 3 years at 4%.

P = 250, r = 4% = 0.04, n = 3

FV = 250 x ((1 + 0.04)^3 - 1) / 0.04

  ≈ 250 x (1.12486 - 1) / 0.04

  ≈ 250 x (0.12486) / 0.04

  ≈ 250 x 3.1215

  ≈ 780.38

So, the future value of $250 per year for 3 years at 4% is about $780.38.

c) $1,000 per year for 2 years at 0%.

P = 1000, r = 0% = 0.00, n = 2

FV = 1000 x ((1 + 0.00)^2 - 1) / 0.00

  = 1000 x (1 - 1) / 0.00

  = 1000 x 0

  = 0

Wait, something went wrong, because we know that if we save $1000 for 2 years with no interest, we should have $2000. This is a special case, where we just sum the contributions because there's no interest:

FV = 1000 x 2

   = 2000

So, the future value of $1,000 per year for 2 years at 0% is $2,000.

An annuity due is similar to an ordinary annuity, but the payments are made at the beginning of each period instead of the end. To convert the future value of an ordinary annuity to an annuity due, you can use the following formula:

FV of Annuity Due = FV of Ordinary Annuity x (1 + r)

a) Reworked

FV of Annuity Due = 3701.55 x (1 + 0.08)

                 ≈ 3701

.55 x 1.08

                 ≈ 3997.67

b) Reworked

FV of Annuity Due = 780.38 x (1 + 0.04)

                 ≈ 780.38 x 1.04

                 ≈ 810.80

c) Reworked

FV of Annuity Due = 2000 x (1 + 0.00)

                 = 2000 x 1

                 = 2000 (This doesn't change because there's no interest).

And there you have it! The future values for both ordinary annuities and annuities due!

Step 1: By analyzing the wave equation using the explicit finite-difference method with given parameters (h=Δx=0.5, k=Δt=0.2), we can obtain a numerical solution.

Step 2: The explicit finite-difference method is a numerical approach used to approximate the solution of partial differential equations. In this case, we are analyzing the given wave equation, which describes the propagation of waves in a medium.

To apply the explicit finite-difference method, we discretize the equation in both space and time. We divide the spatial domain (0≤x≤2) into discrete points with a spacing of h=0.5, and the time domain (0≤t≤0.4) into discrete intervals with a step size of k=0.2.

Using the second-order central difference approximation for the second derivatives, we can rewrite the wave equation as:

[tex](u(i, j+1) - 2u(i, j) + u(i, j-1))/(k^2) = 7.5 * (u(i+1, j) - 2u(i, j) + u(i-1, j))/(h^2)[/tex]

where i represents the spatial index and j represents the temporal index.

We can rearrange this equation to solve for u(i, j+1):

[tex]u(i, j+1) = (k^2 * (7.5 * (u(i+1, j) - 2u(i, j) + u(i-1, j))/(h^2)) + 2u(i, j) - u(i, j-1)[/tex]

Starting with the initial conditions u(x,0)=2x/4 and ∂u(x,0)/∂t=1, we can calculate the values of u at each point in the spatial and temporal grid using the above equation. Additionally, the boundary conditions u(0,t)=0 and u(2,t)=1 can be incorporated into the solution process.

By iterating through the spatial and temporal grid points, we can obtain a numerical solution for the wave equation using the explicit finite-difference method with the given parameters.

Learn more about wave equation

brainly.com/question/30970710

#SPJ11

A. A is 5×4 and b is 5×1

D. The augmented matrix of the system is 4×5

In a system of linear equations, the matrix A represents the coefficients of the variables, and matrix B represents the constant terms. The dimensions of matrix A are determined by the number of equations and the number of variables, so in this case, A is 5×4 (5 rows and 4 columns). Matrix B is the column vector of the constant terms, so it is 5×1 (5 rows and 1 column).

The augmented matrix of the system combines matrix A and matrix B, so it will have the same number of rows as matrix A and one additional column for matrix B. Therefore, the augmented matrix is 4×5.

Option B is incorrect because it states that A is 4×5, which is not consistent with a system of 4 equations in 5 unknowns.

Option C is incorrect because it states that A is 4×4, which is not consistent with a system of 4 equations in 5 unknowns.

Option E is also incorrect because some of the statements A and D are correct.

Know more about augmented matrixhere:

https://brainly.com/question/30403694

#SPJ11

The new ratio of the siblings' share of sweets is 19:28:25. Thus, option A is correct..

Initially, the siblings shared the 42 chocolate sweets according to the ratio 3:6:5.

To find the total number of parts in the ratio, we add the individual ratios: 3 + 6 + 5 = 14 parts.

To determine the share of each sibling, we divide the total number of sweets (42) into 14 parts:

Trust's share = (3/14) * 42 = 9 sweets

Hardlife's share = (6/14) * 42 = 18 sweets

Innocent's share = (5/14) * 42 = 15 sweets

Now, their father buys an additional 30 chocolate sweets and gives 10 to each sibling. This means that each sibling's share increases by 10.

Trust's new share = 9 + 10 = 19 sweets

Hardlife's new share = 18 + 10 = 28 sweets

Innocent's new share = 15 + 10 = 25 sweets

The new ratio of the siblings' share of sweets is 19:28:25.

However, none of the given answer options match this ratio. Please double-check the provided answer choices or the given information to ensure accuracy.

Learn more about ratio

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ11

Number of ways in which assistantships can be awarded among the applicants is = 3×2×1 = 6 ways. If one particular student must be awarded an assistantship, the number of ways would be 2.  The number of ways in which at least one woman will be awarded an assistantship would be : 14C3 - 9C3 = 455 - 84 = 371 ways.

Given information: Pure graduate students have applied for three available teaching assistantships. We have to find the number of ways in which assistantships can be awarded among the applicants.

(a) No preference is given to any one student

Here, since there is no preference, so the assistantships will be awarded on the basis of merit of the students.

Therefore, number of ways in which assistantships can be awarded among the applicants is = 3×2×1 = 6 ways.

(b) One particular student must be awarded an assistantship

If one particular student must be awarded an assistantship, then we need to multiply the number of ways the remaining two assistantships can be awarded to the remaining students. So, the number of ways is 2! = 2 ways.

(c) The group of applicants includes nine men and five women and it is stipulated that at least one woman must be awarded an assistantship

The total number of ways to distribute three teaching assistantships between 14 graduate students is 14C3.

The number of ways in which no woman is selected for the assistantship is 9C3. [ Since we need to select 3 assistantships from the 9 men]

Therefore, the number of ways in which at least one woman will be awarded an assistantship is:

14C3 - 9C3 = 455 - 84 = 371 ways.

Answer: (a) 6 ways(b) 2 ways(c) 371 ways

Learn more about assistantship at https://brainly.com/question/32096724

#SPJ11

The central angle of the minor sector is given as 72° and then the length of the minor arc AB is 16 cm.

To calculate the length of the minor arc AB, we need to determine the fraction of the circumference represented by the central angle of the sector.

The central angle of the minor sector is given as 72°. To find the fraction of the circumference corresponding to this angle, we divide the angle measure by 360° (the total angle in a circle).

Fraction of circumference = (angle measure / 360°)

Fraction of circumference = (72° / 360°) = 1/5

Now, we can find the length of the minor arc AB by multiplying the fraction of the circumference by the total circumference of the circle.

Length of minor arc AB = (1/5) * 80 cm = 16 cm

Therefore, the length of the minor arc AB is 16 cm.

Know more about central angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/10945528

#SPJ8

If a and b are congruent modulo m, they will also be congruent modulo cm, implying that their difference is divisible by both m and cm.

When two numbers, a and b, are congruent modulo m (denoted as a ≡ b (mod m)), it means that the difference between a and b is divisible by m. In other words, (a - b) is a multiple of m.

To prove that if a ≡ b (mod m), then a ≡ b (mod cm), we need to show that the difference between a and b is also divisible by cm.

Since a ≡ b (mod m), we can express this congruence as (a - b) = km, where k is an integer. Now, we need to prove that (a - b) is also divisible by cm.

To do this, we can rewrite (a - b) as (a - b) = (km)(c). Since k and c are both integers, their product (km)(c) is also an integer. Therefore, (a - b) is divisible by cm, which can be expressed as a ≡ b (mod cm).

In simpler terms, if the difference between a and b is divisible by m, it will also be divisible by cm because m is a factor of cm. This demonstrates that if a ≡ b (mod m), then a ≡ b (mod cm).

Learn more about Congruent

brainly.com/question/30596171

#SPJ11

The minimal possible value of ||Ax - b|| is 0.

To find the minimal possible value of ||Ax - b|| for x ∈ R², we need to minimize the distance between the vector Ax and b.

Given A = 5 and b = 3, the expression ||Ax - b|| represents the Euclidean norm (also known as the 2-norm or the length) of the vector Ax - b.

We can calculate this value as follows:

Ax = [5x₁, 5x₂] (where x = [x₁, x₂])

Ax - b = [5x₁, 5x₂] - [3, 3] = [5x₁ - 3, 5x₂ - 3]

||Ax - b|| = sqrt((5x₁ - 3)² + (5x₂ - 3)²)

To find the minimal possible value of ||Ax - b||, we need to find the values of x₁ and x₂ that minimize the expression inside the square root.

Since we want to minimize the square root expression, we can minimize its square instead:

f(x₁, x₂) = (5x₁ - 3)² + (5x₂ - 3)²

To find the minimum, we can take partial derivatives concerning x₁ and x₂ and set them equal to zero:

∂f/∂x₁ = 10(5x₁ - 3) = 0

∂f/∂x₂ = 10(5x₂ - 3) = 0

Solving these equations gives:

5x₁ - 3 = 0 --> 5x₁ = 3 --> x₁ = 3/5

5x₂ - 3 = 0 --> 5x₂ = 3 --> x₂ = 3/5

Therefore, the values of x₁ and x₂ that minimize the expression ||Ax - b|| are x₁ = 3/5 and x₂ = 3/5.

Substituting these values back into the expression, we get:

||Ax - b|| = sqrt((5(3/5) - 3)² + (5(3/5) - 3)²)

= sqrt((3 - 3)² + (3 - 3)²)

= sqrt(0 + 0)

= 0

Hence, the minimal possible value of ||Ax - b|| is 0.

Learn more about Euclidean norm here

https://brainly.com/question/15018847

#SPJ11

The diameter of the circle is approximately 8.50 yards and the radius is approximately 4.25 yards.

To find the diameter and radius of a circle when given the circumference, we can use the formulas:
Circumference = 2πr
Diameter = 2r
Given that the circumference is C = 26.7 yd, we can substitute this value into the circumference formula:
26.7 = 2πr
To find the radius, we need to isolate it on one side of the equation. Dividing both sides of the equation by 2π, we get:
r = 26.7 / (2π)
Now we can calculate the value of r using a calculator:
r ≈ 4.25 yd (rounded to the nearest hundredth)
To find the diameter, we can multiply the radius by 2:
Diameter = 2 * 4.25 ≈ 8.50 yd (rounded to the nearest hundredth)
Therefore, the diameter of the circle is approximately 8.50 yards and the radius is approximately 4.25 yards.

Learn more about circle here:

https://brainly.com/question/12930236

#SPJ11

The degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator. So, there is no horizontal asymptote. Therefore, the given function has no horizontal asymptote. The oblique asymptote is found by dividing the numerator by the denominator using long division. The graph of the function is graph{x^2(8x^2+26x-7)/(4x-1) [-10, 10, -5, 5]}

Given rational function is:

R(x) = (8x² + 26x - 7) / (4x - 1)To find the vertical, horizontal, and oblique asymptotes, if any, of the rational function, follow these steps:

Step 1: Find the Vertical Asymptote The vertical asymptote is the value of x which makes the denominator zero. Thus, we solve the denominator of the given function as follows:4x - 1 = 0  

⇒ x = 1/4

Therefore, x = 1/4 is the vertical asymptote of the given function.

Step 2: Find the Horizontal Asymptote

The degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator.

So, there is no horizontal asymptote.

Therefore, the given function has no horizontal asymptote.

Step 3: Find the Oblique Asymptote The oblique asymptote is found by dividing the numerator by the denominator using long division.

8x² + 26x - 7/4x - 1

= 2x + 7 + (1 / (4x - 1))

Therefore, y = 2x + 7 is the oblique asymptote of the given function.

Step 4: Graph of the Function The graph of the function is shown below:

graph{x^2(8x^2+26x-7)/(4x-1) [-10, 10, -5, 5]}

The vertical asymptote is the value of x which makes the denominator zero. Thus, we solve the denominator of the given function. The degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator. So, there is no horizontal asymptote. Therefore, the given function has no horizontal asymptote. The oblique asymptote is found by dividing the numerator by the denominator using long division. The graph of the function is shown above.

To know more about numerator visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7067665

#SPJ11