select the true statement about the restatement of the law of contracts. a.) it supersedes the uniform commercial code (ucc) when deciding contract cases relating to the sale of goods. b.) it codified a series of statutes that judges must now follow when deciding contract cases. c.) it clarified and simplified the case law that had developed around contract disputes by the early twentieth century. d.) it was drafted in 1932 and has not been revised since.

Answer: B. The relationship between the federal government and state

governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution

Explanation: The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and it grants specific powers to the federal government while reserving other powers to the states.  This division of powers is known as federalism.

The Constitution provides a list of powers that are specifically delegated to the federal government.  These powers include the ability to regulate commerce, declare war, establish a currency, and maintain a postal system, among others.  On the other hand, the Constitution also reserves certain powers to the states, known as reserved powers.  These powers are not specifically granted to the federal government and are left to the states to exercise.  Examples of reserved powers include the power to regulate intrastate commerce, establish and maintain schools, and regulate marriage and divorce laws.

This division of powers helps to maintain a balance between the federal government and the states.  It allows the federal government to address issues that affect the entire nation, while also granting states the ability to govern themselves in areas that are more local in nature.  This system of shared powers helps to prevent an imbalance of power and promotes cooperation and collaboration between the federal government and state governments.

Learn more about the federal government here: https://brainly.com/question/14858877.

The most appropriate title for the chart above is "Summary of Federalist and Anti-Federalist beliefs."

The chart describes the beliefs of two opposing groups in the United States during the late 18th century, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, on issues such as the size of the national government, the need for a Bill of Rights, and the strength of the central government.

The chart clearly presents the differences between these two groups and their beliefs, which were critical in shaping the U.S. Constitution and the early years of the new nation.

The type of government that passes rule from parent to oldest child is a monarchy.

Monarchies are hereditary forms of government in which power is passed down through a family dynasty. In a monarchy, the oldest son is usually the one who inherits the throne when the previous monarch dies or abdicates.

This type of government is very different from a democracy, in which power is vested in the people, or a dictatorship, in which power is held by a single individual who has usually seized control by force.

Read more about monarchy here;

https://brainly.com/question/3710014

#SPJ1

The basic classes of weapons include firearms, melee weapons, and explosives. Firearms use projectiles propelled by gunpowder.

Guns are weapons that shoot projectiles like bullets or pellets at a target at high speeds using an explosive charge.There are numerous different sorts of weapons, each with unique benefits and drawbacks, such as pistols, rifles, shotguns, and machine guns.Swords, knives, axes, clubs, and other close-quarters combat weapons are examples of melee weapons.A melee weapon's potency is influenced by its properties, such as weight, balance, and durability, as well as the skill of the user.Explosives are weapons that produce a tremendous blast through chemical reactions that can be used to damage objects or kill targets.High explosives, which detonate with supersonic shock waves, and low explosives, which detonate with less powerful shock waves.Guns are weapons that shoot projectiles like bullets or pellets at a target at high speeds using an explosive charge.

learn more about weapons here:

https://brainly.com/question/10275462

#SPJ1

Because Peg is not compensated for the activities she is performing on her brother's behalf, she owes him only the duties of loyalty, information, and the duty to account.

An agent is a person who performs activities on behalf of another person. There are many different types of agents, such as real estate agents, stockbrokers, and attorneys. An agent's responsibilities to his or her principal are defined as follows:

Duty of loyalty: The agent must act solely in the interests of the principal and avoid conflicts of interest.Duty of obedience: The agent must follow the principal's instructions and obey any legal restrictions.

Duty of care: The agent must act with the same level of care and diligence that a reasonable person would use in similar circumstances.

Duty to inform: The agent must keep the principal informed of all material facts and changes in circumstances.

Duty to account: The agent must keep accurate records of all transactions and provide an accounting of all funds entrusted to him or her for the principal's benefit. Therefore, as Peg is not compensated for the activities she is performing on her brother's behalf, she owes him only the duties of loyalty, information, and the duty to account.

For more such questions on duties of loyalty, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30572246

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

The law that applies to this situation varies depending on the country or state you are in.

In the United States, most states have a zero-tolerance policy for drivers under the age of 21 who are found to have any measurable amount of alcohol in their system. This is typically referred to as a "zero tolerance law." Under this law, drivers under 21 years old with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .02 or above can face penalties such as license suspension or revocation, fines, and mandatory alcohol education programs.

It's important to note that the specific penalties for violating this law can vary by state, and the legal drinking age is also different in some countries. It's always best to check your local laws to ensure you understand the specific regulations and penalties that apply to your situation.

According to the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, drivers who are under 21 years old with a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of .02 or above may lose their license.

The Zero Tolerance Law was designed to protect underage drivers from the dangers of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. When a driver under the age of 21 is found to have a BAC of .02 or higher, their license will be automatically suspended for a certain amount of time. This law was put in place to discourage underage drivers from drinking and driving, as the consequences for doing so are much more serious than for adults.

Here you can learn more about zero tolerance law https://brainly.com/question/30706389

#SPJ11

The criminal justice system plays a crucial role in counter-terrorism by investigating, prosecuting, and punishing individuals or groups who commit terrorist acts. It also works to prevent future terrorist attacks through intelligence gathering, surveillance, and analysis. Additionally, the criminal justice system provides support and assistance to victims of terrorism and their families. Overall, the criminal justice system plays a vital role in protecting national security and ensuring public safety.

Explanation:

"Fruit of the poisonous tree" is a legal term that refers to evidence that is obtained illegally or unlawfully. This principle holds that evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful or unconstitutional search, seizure, or interrogation is tainted and therefore inadmissible in court. The term is derived from the idea that evidence obtained from an illegal source is like a poisonous tree, where everything that grows from it is tainted and cannot be used.

Locard's Exchange Principle is a forensic principle that states that every contact leaves a trace. This principle was formulated by Dr. Edmond Locard, a French forensic scientist, in the early 20th century. According to the principle, whenever two objects come into contact with each other, there will be a transfer of materials between them. This transfer can include physical, biological, and chemical materials, such as fibers, hairs, DNA, and fingerprints. The principle is used in criminal investigations to link suspects to crime scenes, and to link objects found at the crime scene to suspects. By analyzing the materials exchanged during a contact, forensic scientists can establish a link between a suspect and a crime scene or victim.

"Potholes", "immigration policy" , and "nuclear-weapons agreements" are topics that citizens can use their political voice to contact government officials. Option d is the correct answer.

A political voice is an individual or group's potential to influence political decisions that affect their well-being. Political voice describes a group or individual's ability to voice their opinion in government or other influential settings. It is the capability of speaking or communicating about one's needs, needs, and concerns to people or groups with the authority to address them.

In terms of policy-making and governance, the political voice of the people has a critical role to play. It helps to establish good governance and effective policymaking processes in countries, particularly democracies. Citizens can use their political voice to contact government officials on a variety of topics, including potholes, immigration policy, nuclear-weapons agreements, and others.

In a nutshell, citizens may employ their political voice to communicate with government officials on any issue that affects their well-being or concerns.  As a result, the answer is d. All of the above.

You can learn more about politics at

https://brainly.com/question/30568978

#SPJ11

Answer:

Brainliest Please!

Explanation:

The VBS bank scandal in South Africa was one of the largest financial frauds in the country's history. The scandal involved senior executives at VBS Mutual Bank allegedly looting R1.8 billion ($130 million) from the bank's coffers. Following the scandal, various legislative controls were put in place to prevent similar occurrences in the future. Some of these controls include:

The Financial Sector Regulation Act (FSRA): This act was signed into law in August 2017, and it aims to provide a comprehensive and consistent regulatory framework for the financial sector. The FSRA established the Prudential Authority (PA) and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) as the two regulatory bodies responsible for supervising and regulating financial institutions and market conduct.

The Banks Amendment Act: This act was signed into law in January 2019 and aims to strengthen the governance and oversight of banks in South Africa. The act gives the PA and the FSCA more powers to regulate the banking sector, including the power to conduct investigations, impose fines and sanctions, and intervene in the affairs of banks.

The Public Investment Corporation Amendment Act: This act was signed into law in February 2019 and aims to improve governance at the Public Investment Corporation (PIC), which manages the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) and other public funds. The act introduces various measures to enhance transparency and accountability at the PIC, including the appointment of independent directors and the separation of the roles of the CEO and the Chairperson.

The Financial Intelligence Centre Amendment Act: This act was signed into law in April 2017 and aims to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The act introduces various measures to strengthen the financial intelligence capabilities of the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC), including the requirement for accountable institutions to identify and verify the identity of their clients.

Overall, these legislative controls aim to promote transparency, accountability, and good governance in the financial sector, and to prevent the recurrence of financial scandals like the VBS bank scandal.

Answer:

The VBS bank scandal was a case of financial corruption that involved the looting of over R2 billion from the VBS Mutual Bank in South Africa by its executives and other high-ranking officials. In response to the scandal, the South African government and regulatory bodies implemented several legislative controls to prevent similar abuses in the future.Some of the legislative controls that were put in place against the abuse of the VBS bank scandal include:The Financial Sector Regulation Act (2017): This act provides a legal framework for the regulation of financial institutions in South Africa, including banks, insurance companies, and other financial services providers. It aims to promote financial stability, protect consumers, and reduce the risk of financial misconduct.The Banks Amendment Act (2018): This act amends the Banks Act of 1990 and introduces new provisions to enhance the powers of the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) to regulate and supervise banks. The act gives SARB greater powers to intervene in failing banks, protect depositors, and take action against banks that engage in risky or fraudulent activities.The Public Investment Corporation Amendment Act (2018): This act amends the Public Investment Corporation Act of 2004 and aims to strengthen the governance and oversight of the Public Investment Corporation (PIC), which is responsible for managing public funds and investing in state-owned enterprises. The act introduces new requirements for the appointment of board members and mandates greater transparency and accountability in the PIC's operations.The Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Amendment Act (2018): This act amends the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act of 2004 and introduces new provisions to combat corruption and financial misconduct. The act increases the penalties for corruption and introduces new offenses, including the offense of "trading in influence."Overall, these legislative controls aim to prevent financial corruption and promote transparency, accountability, and good governance in the South African financial sector.

The type of violence that happens most commonly in the prison system is physical violence. Another common form of violence that occurs here is se-xual assault.

Every prisoner must be treated with the decency and respect that come with their inherent value as persons. No national nor social origin, race, color, s-ex, language, religion, political opinions, other ideologies, property, birth, nor any other status may be used as grounds for discrimination.

By deterring both current and future criminals, incapacitating offenders and preventing them from committing the same crime again, or by rehabilitating prisoners into law-abiding citizens, imprisonment can be used as a tool to reduce the frequency of criminal activity.

Exposure to violence can increase the risk of mental illness, sui-cidality, chronic illnesses like heart disease, diabetes, and cancer, infectious diseases like HIV, and social problems like crime and further violence. It can also increase the chance of smoking, drinking, and using drugs.

Learn more about physical violence: https://brainly.com/question/29970467

#SPJ1

As per the given problem, Fran is injured in Ed’s mighty amusement park located in the state of Utopia. The state of Utopia has a state statute requiring amusement park owners to maintain their equipment under specific conditions; setting out clearly the standard of conduct, when and where it is expected, and to whom it is expected. Ed, who owns and operates Ed's mighty amusement park, located in the state of Utopia, fails to adhere to the requirements of the Utopia statute. In an effort to prove Ed breached his duty of care, Fran's best theory would be negligence.

Negligence is the legal concept used in tort law to describe a scenario in which one party is responsible for harming another person through careless or reckless behavior. Negligence is a legal concept that is used in tort law. Negligence refers to a situation in which one party is liable for harming another person as a result of careless or reckless behavior.  

A duty of care is an obligation to take reasonable measures to avoid injuring others. Ed breached his duty of care by failing to adhere to the requirements of the Utopia statute. Therefore, Fran could sue Ed under a theory of negligence.

Know more about legal concept here:

https://brainly.com/question/28755242

#SPJ11

Explanation:

If an appellate court rules that a trial court did not correctly apply the law in a case, the appellate court may either reverse or remand the case back to the trial court.

If the appellate court reverses the trial court's decision, it means that the trial court's decision is completely overturned, and a new decision is issued in its place. This could result in the case being dismissed, a new trial being ordered, or a new judgment being entered in favor of one of the parties.

If the appellate court remands the case back to the trial court, it means that the case is sent back to the trial court for further proceedings. The trial court will be instructed to correct any errors that were identified by the appellate court, and may be required to conduct a new trial, reconsider its ruling, or take other steps as necessary to address the issues raised on appeal.

In either case, the appellate court's ruling serves as precedent for future cases, and may have a significant impact on how similar cases are decided in the future.

Based on the information presented in Chapter 11 of the PowerPoint, the "Direct Supervision Model" seems best suited to addressing the challenges of running a prison in today's environment.

The Direct Supervision Model involves placing correctional officers in direct contact with inmates in a centralized unit, rather than relying on remote surveillance or physical barriers to maintain control. This model has been shown to reduce violence and disorder in prisons, as well as increase staff and inmate safety.

Moreover, the Direct Supervision Model can help address the issue of increased inmate access to the outside world through cellphones, as correctional officers are in direct contact with inmates and can more effectively monitor their behavior and communications.

In addition, the Direct Supervision Model can also help reduce corrections budgets by minimizing the need for costly physical barriers and remote surveillance systems. Instead, this model focuses on the direct interaction between correctional officers and inmates, which can improve outcomes and reduce costs in the long run.

To know more about communications.

https://brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ4

The given statement "battery is any intentional and unexcused threat of immediate harmful or offensive contact words or acts that create a reasonably believable threat" is FALSE.

Battery is defined as any intentional and unexcused threat of immediate harmful or offensive contact - words or acts that create a reasonably believable threat. It can also be defined as a tort that is committed when an individual intentionally or recklessly causes bodily harm to another person. The battery is an intentional tort, and it can be accompanied by criminal charges as well.

However, the given statement about batteries is not entirely true. The given statement describes an act of assault, not the battery. The battery is when actual physical contact or harm is inflicted on another person. So, the given statement is false because it describes an act of assault, not battery.

You can learn more about offensive contact at: brainly.com/question/30822347

#SPJ11

The U.S. Supreme Court decided that the Enforcement Act of 1870 was unconstitutional, thus turning a blind eye to paramilitary white supremacist violence in the wake of Reconstruction in the case of United States v. Cruikshank.

Learn more about U.S. Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ11

Answer:

video games

Explanation:

between that and carrying a weapon, which i obvious in everyone not just teens

Answer: Playing violent video games

Explanation: I took the test and got it right

Hope this helps

The true statement concerning discrimination on the basis of race or ethnic identity in the United States is that it still exists in various aspects of society, including education, employment, and criminal justice. The correct option is a)

In the education system, racial disparities persist in areas such as access to quality education, standardized test scores, and dropout rates. For example, minority students are more likely to attend underfunded schools, leading to limited access to essential resources and opportunities.

In the employment sector, racial discrimination can be observed through wage gaps, biased hiring practices, and limited opportunities for career advancement. Research has shown that minority applicants often face challenges in securing job interviews due to unconscious biases among employers.

The criminal justice system is also significantly affected by racial and ethnic discrimination. Statistics reveal that minorities, particularly African Americans and Hispanics, are disproportionately represented in the prison population, and they are more likely to receive harsher sentences for similar crimes compared to their white counterparts.

To address these issues, various policies and measures have been implemented, such as affirmative action programs, anti-discrimination laws, and diversity training.

However, there is still much work to be done to ensure equal opportunities and fair treatment for all individuals, regardless of their race or ethnic background.

To learn more about discrimination here:

https://brainly.com/question/1084594#

#SPJ11

Complete Question

which statement concerning discrimination on the basis of race or ethnic identity in the united states is true?

a)  it still exists in various aspects of society, including education, employment, and criminal justice.

b) different groups have had different degrees of succeed in fighting the effects of discrimination.

c) Americans under 18 years are denied many basic rights granted to those who are older.

d) older people are better organized to protect their rights that younger people.

Answer:

Explanation:

Normalizing Violence: When media perpetuates the portrayal of women as helpless and vulnerable victims of violence, it can contribute to the normalization of violence against women. This can create a culture where violence against women is seen as acceptable or even justified, leading to an increase in instances of violence against women.

Victim-Blaming: Media portrayal of women as vulnerable victims can also lead to victim-blaming, which is the practice of holding victims responsible for the crimes committed against them. This can happen when media reinforces harmful stereotypes that blame women for their own victimization, such as suggesting that a woman was "asking for it" by dressing a certain way or being out late at night.

Lack of Empowerment: Media portrayal of women as vulnerable can also contribute to a lack of empowerment for women, which can lead to a higher risk of violence. When women are constantly portrayed as weak and in need of protection, it can limit their ability to advocate for themselves, speak out against violence, and access resources that could help them escape abusive situations. This can make them more vulnerable to violence and less likely to seek help when they need it.

Answer & Explanation:

The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution outlawed slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. It was ratified on December 6, 1865.

No, yvette is not criminally liable. Yvette cannot be held liable for Paul's actions because she had no knowledge of his actions. Under criminal law, a principal (Yvette) is not liable for the unauthorized acts of an agent (Paul). The dishwashers can still pursue a civil suit against Yvette and Paul, but Yvette will not be found criminally liable.

The dishwashers can file a civil suit against Yvette and Paul, but only Paul can be held criminally liable. This is because criminal liability requires that the person acted with intent or knowledge. Yvette had no knowledge of Paul's actions and could not have reasonably foreseen that he would pay workers less than the minimum wage.

If the wage violations are considered strict liability crimes, Yvette may be held liable, even though she was unaware of Paul's actions. Strict liability offenses do not require intent or knowledge. However, wage violations are usually not strict liability crimes, meaning that Yvette cannot be held liable.

In conclusion, Yvette cannot be held criminally liable for Paul's actions because she had no knowledge of them. Therefore yvette is not criminally liable.

Know more about minimum wage here:

https://brainly.com/question/4894733

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

If the federal government receives $3 trillion in tax revenue over the course of one year but spends only $2 trillion, it means the government has a budget surplus for the year. A budget surplus occurs when the government's revenue exceeds its expenses, which can be used to pay down debt, invest in infrastructure or public services, or returned to taxpayers through tax cuts or rebates.

Answer:

I'm sorry, but the question seems to be incomplete or unclear. Could you please provide more context or information so that I can better understand what you are looking for?

One phrase that Hitler used during his 1942 anti-Semitism speech is this: "they will stop laughing altogether, and I will fulfill my prophecy in this field too. ”

Anti-semitism was a movement that was aimed at eliminating the Jews. This movement was spearheaded by Hitler and he made a speech in September 1942 to the Reichstag listeners where he boasted that he would stop the Jews from laughing.

According to him, he made a prophecy that the Jews laughed about and now he was determined to fulfill his prophecy. This movement is a horrible event in history that terminated the lives of many Jews.

Learn more about anti-semitism here:

https://brainly.com/question/4103285

#SPJ1

1. Why did the Supreme Court decide three cases in one opinion?

The Supreme Court decided three cases in one opinion because it saw them as presenting similar legal issues and wanted to ensure consistency across the decisions.

2. What is the main issue the Supreme Court is deciding on in this opinion?

The main issue the Supreme Court is deciding in this opinion is whether certain companies are legally obligated to provide contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

3. Explain in your own words the Supreme Court's reasoning for its holding.

The Supreme Court reasoned that the government cannot impose the contraceptive coverage mandate on closely-held companies because it would impose a substantial burden on the religious beliefs of their owners.

4. Can you explain the difference in the dissenting opinions of Justices Alito and Kavanaugh?

Justice Alito argued that the contraceptive mandate should not be held unconstitutional because it did not impose a substantial burden on the religious beliefs of closely-held companies, while Justice Kavanaugh argued that it was still an unconstitutional violation of religious liberty.

To know more about Supreme Court refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/12848156#

#SPJ11

The tax incentives that Georgia created in 2002 and 2008 were designed to encourage the growth of the film and television industry in the state. The state offered a 20% tax credit for companies that spent at least $500,000 on production and post-production in Georgia, with an additional 10% credit available for including the Georgia logo in the credits of the production.

These incentives have helped to make Georgia a popular location for film and television production, with the state hosting the production of numerous major movies and television series in recent years.

To encourage studios to film in the state, the government created tax breaks. Heritage tourism is an important contributor towards the Georgia economy.

To know more about tax incentives

https://brainly.com/question/11459749

#SPJ4

The federal kidnapping statute requires that the victim be transported across state lines as an element of the offense that must be proven.

This is due to constitutional restrictions which protect individuals from being unlawfully detained within a single state.

In order for the federal kidnapping statute to be applicable, the victim must be transported across state lines. This is the primary element of the offense and must be proven in order to successfully prosecute the kidnapper.

This requirement is a result of constitutional restrictions that protect individuals from being unlawfully detained within a single state. As such, the prosecution must demonstrate that the victim was transported across state lines in order for the federal kidnapping statute to be applicable.

To know more about federal statute click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30356979#

#SPJ11

The laws that permit employers to automatically enroll employees in a defined contribution plan is "The Pension Protection Act" It allows employers to automatically enroll employees in a defined contribution plan. The correct option is C) Pension Protection Act

Define contribution plan: In a defined contribution plan, an employer contributes a specific amount or percentage of an employee's salary to a retirement account. The funds in the account are invested and grow over time. The employee then receives the accumulated funds when they retire.

There are several laws that govern defined contribution plans, but the Pension Protection Act is the one that permits employers to automatically enroll employees. Automatic enrollment means that an employee is automatically enrolled in the plan unless they opt out. This is designed to increase participation in the plan and help employees save more for retirement.

The other laws listed in the question are also relevant to defined contribution plans, but they do not specifically address automatic enrollment. The Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act (COBRA) provides certain rights to employees who lose their health benefits.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) sets standards for pension plans, including defined contribution plans. The Internal Revenue Code provides tax rules for retirement plans, including defined contribution plans.

To learn more about defined contribution plan here:

https://brainly.com/question/30066472#

#SPJ11

A stereotype is a broadly held, simplified, and essentialist conviction about a particular pack. Bunches are much of the time generalized based on sex, direction nature, race and identity, ethnicity, age, financial status, language, etc.

Stereotype danger is characterized as a "socially commenced mental danger that emerges when one is in a circumstance or working on something for which a negative stereotype around one's gathering applies"

Stereotype danger alludes to the gamble of affirming negative generalizations about a person's racial, ethnic, orientation, or social gathering which can make a high mental burden and diminish scholastic concentration and execution. The term was instituted by the specialists Claude Steele and Joshua Aronson.

Rehashed encounters of generalization danger can prompt an endless loop of decreased certainty, lackluster showing, and loss of interest in the significant area of accomplishment. Generalization danger has been contended to show a decrease in the presentation of people who have a place with adversely generalized gatherings.

To learn more about stereotypes here

https://brainly.com/question/13281670

#SPJ4

Answer:

Option e is not a safe practice for drivers

Explanation:

Answer:

Jurisdiction

Explanation:

The term that refers to the authority of a court to hear a case is "jurisdiction."

Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari all afford stability and predictability to the law. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin term meaning “the thing speaks for itself” and it is a rule of evidence used in civil suits. The rule allows for an inference of negligence on the part of the defendant.

Stare decisis is a legal principle in which a court should follow its previous decisions when the same legal issues arise. Certiorari is a type of writ (order) used by a higher court to review the decision of a lower court. Stare decisis affords stability and predictability to the law.

The concept of stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It is the principle of determining points of law according to precedent. The term is applied in the sense that courts should follow the principles they had established earlier in making judgments.

It provides that a court should follow the rules and principles made by it in a previous decision that has similar facts and issues. This will provide stability and predictability to the law. It ensures the continuity of the law and helps in maintaining stability and consistency in its application.

Other options: Res ipsa loquitur: This is a legal doctrine that allows the court to presume negligence without the plaintiff providing direct evidence of negligence. This does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Clemency is the act of mercy or leniency shown by the authorities to a person who has committed a crime.

This is not a legal doctrine and does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Certiorari is a writ or order from a higher court to a lower court or tribunal directing it to send up the record of a particular case for review. It does not afford stability and predictability to the law.

To know more about Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12177870#

#SPJ11