Answer:
The best ways to control organized crime :
1. The center link where such groups are being controlled from should be attacked .
2. Special forces for special crimes should be trained and maintained.
3. Special laws should be passed against such crimes for punishment and also for investigation purposes.
4. Strict actions from forces should be taken at first.
5. General public should be made aware of popular faces so that people can help the authorities also.
Explain the difference between human capital and physical capital.
Answer: Physical capital uses equipments, tools and other objects. Human capital is based on what you know (knowledge) what you can do (talent).
Answer:
Physical capital implies the non-human assets of the company, such as plant and machinery, tools and equipment, office supplies etc. that help in the process of production. Human capital refers to the stock of knowledge, talent, skills, and abilities brought in by the employee, to the organization.
Explanation:
the federal trade commission (ftc) is a government agency that issues rules, orders, and decisions. the georgia state legislature enacts statutes. the harrison county board and the island city council enact ordinances. administrative law includes
Administrative Law includes the rules, orders, and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) if the Georgia State legislature enacts statutes while the Harrison County Board and Island City Council enact ordinances.
Administrative law is the body of laws and legal doctrines governing how government agencies are run and regulated. It is the body of law developed to implement legislation passed by Congress or by a state legislature.
This is also the area of law that controls the establishment and operation of administrative agencies. Thus, when you apply for government benefits, you will deal with the administrative law as well as administrative agencies.
Learn about the administrative law that consists of the collection of rules and decisions made by administrative agencies: https://brainly.com/question/28362785
For everyone's information, since your question is a little unclear, here is how it should have appeared:
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is a government agency that issues rules, orders, and decisions. The Georgia state legislature enacts statutes. the Harrison County Board and the Island city council enact ordinances. Administrative law includes:
a) Ordinances created by Harrison County Board and the Island city council.
b) All law that affects a business's operation.
c) The rules, orders, and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission.
d) Statutes enacted by the Georgia state legislature.
#SPJ4
Alex and Lauren married in January 2021. In 2019, before Alex had even met Lauren, he had a large balance due on his federal return. He was unable to pay the full amount by the due date of the return, and he still has an outstanding debt of $8,000. The couple filed a joint return for 2021, but the IRS offset their refund because of Alex's past-due obligation. Lauren is not obligated to pay Alex's debt, and she would like to receive her portion of their tax refund for the current year. As the couple's tax preparer, what advice would you offer?
As the couple's tax preparer, the advice I would offer Lauren is that she must be ready to bear with Alex and forgo the tax refund, though, she is legally entitled to it, or they should decide to file Married Separate for 2021.
Do couples who file jointly bear the other's debts?Legally, couples are not obligated to bear the debts of their spouses before, during, or after marriage.
However, if they want to enjoy the benefits for those filing jointly, they must be ready to accept some consequences, including being jointly responsible for past-due tax obligations.
Laureen could have filed Married Separate instead of Married Joint, at least for 2021, if she wanted her portion of their tax refund.
Thus, in other words, Laureen cannot eat her cake and have it. The same rule applies to the IRS tax refund.
Learn more about IRS tax refunds at https://brainly.com/question/2135349
#SPJ1
Answer: I would recommend Lauren file Form 8369. She should be able to recover her portion of the refund that was offset.
Explanation:
Filing Married Filing Separate would not be beneficial due to losing specific credits that may have been the only reason the couple was due a refund in the first place. The balance due to the IRS is from an issue Alex had before marrying Lauren, which if they had not married, she would not have a burden to bear.
Which of the following is NOT an example of a civil case?
a. A property dispute between two neighbors.
b. Arguing in court about the individual rights of citizens.
c. Arguing in court over the custody (ownership) of a pet.
d. Kidnapping the family dog after losing custody and fleeing to the country.
Answer:
A I think.
Explanation:
A Property Dispute Lawyer has expertise in the area of disputes surrounding property ownership and use, whereas a Conveyancing Lawyer deals with the purchase and sale of properties. Although the two can overlap, such as if there is a dispute regarding a property settlement, they are still distinct areas of law.
Which of these is a major responsibility of members of Congress?
a
giving help to constituents
b
deciding who will receive federal grants
c
finding jobs for constitutents
d
providing analysis for the CBO
Answer:
the right answer is A answer
True or False: A Class C misdemeanor is an "Arrestable Offense
Answer: True
Explanation:
Which of the following illustrates a similarity between the Senate and the House of Representatives?
They use a committee system to write laws.
They have very strict rules for floor debate.
They have an age requirement for membership of 25 years.
Membership is apportioned based on the population of the state they represent.
Answer:
The House has a reputation of being much more contentious and impulsive when it comes to legislation. By comparison, it is fairly easy to be elected to the House, which means you have won a congressional district vote vs. a Senate seat which is a statewide vote. So Senators, by definition, usually have to be more moderate than Representatives in order to get elected.
The House will often vote for controversial policies such as abortion limits or banning flag burning, knowing full well they can make such votes without it having a chance to pass the Senate. So they can posture and throw red meat to the crowds in their districts without actually having to accomplish anything.
Similarity between the Senate and the House of Representatives include the following:
They use a committee system to write laws.They have very strict rules for floor debate.Membership is apportioned based on the population of the state they represent.What is Senate?This is the highest chamber in bicameral legislature and are involved in making laws.
It has some similarities with the House of Representatives which can be seen above.
Read more about Senate here https://brainly.com/question/1423526
#SPJ2
Which of the following likely would not be a condition of punitive probation?
a. a specific dress code at all times
b. fines
c. confiscation of property
d. sanctions tailored to the individual crime
An action which would likely not be a condition of punitive probation is: c. confiscation of property.
What is probation?In criminal law, probation can be defined as the legal release of a criminal or an offender from detention, which is typically subjected to a period of good behavior and conduct, especially under supervision by a probation officer.
Generally speaking, punitive probation is considered as a more restrictive form of probation because it is primarily focused on the punishment aspect of a criminal sentence such as:
Community service.Specific dress code at all timesFinesSanctions tailored to the individual crime.Read more on punitive probation here: https://brainly.com/question/3521847
#SPJ1
What is reciprocal distribution?
Answer:
In probability and statistics, the reciprocal distribution, also known as the log-uniform distribution, is a continuous probability distribution. It is characterised by its probability density function, within the support of the distribution, being proportional to the reciprocal of the variable. The reciprocal distribution is an example of an inverse distribution, and the reciprocal of a random variable with a reciprocal distribution itself has a reciprocal distribution.
Explanation:
Sorry but I am unable to answer this question due to the honor code and must report you to the admins
Answer:
what ????????????????????
bibi brings a lawsuit against cocteau over an allegedly defective shipment of machine parts. during the trial, bibi’s attorney asks questions of bibi’s witness drummond. this is
A Direct Examination occurs when Bibi’s attorney asks questions of Bibi’s witness Drummond during the trial.
The party who called the witness to the stand will ask them their first questions during the Direct Examination, while the opposing party (in this case, Cocteau) will ask questions during the Cross-Examination to expose any flaws in the claim of the witness.
For additional information, since Voir Dire is a formal examination specifically designed to ascertain a witness' qualifications as a proposed witness and to ascertain a witness' or juror's competency, when a Bibi's attorney questions Bibi's witness, that is not "to speak the truth" or Voir Dire.
Find out what happens when a lawyer attempt to undermine a witness’s credibility during a portion of the trial: https://brainly.com/question/4710125
#SPJ4
Un automovil de 1,200 kg que viaja a 30 m/s aplica los frenos y derrapa antes de detenerse. Si la fuerza de fricción entre el deslizamiento de las llantas y el pavimento es de 6,000 N, ¿Que distancia recorrerá el coche antes de alcanzar el reposo?
Answer:
The correct answer is 90 m
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the calculation of the how much far would the car travel prior reaching rest is as follows:
Here the theorem of living forces is applied
-Fd = 1 ÷ 2 m (V^2 - Vo^2)
where,
V = 0
Now the d is
= 1,200km (30 m/s)^2 ÷ (2. 6000)
= 90 m
hence, the calculation of the how much far would the car travel prior reaching rest is 90 m
Gil found a nearly new engine in his neighbor's garage. He was experienced enough to see that it was in good shape. When he asked the neighbor how much she wanted for it, she said "you can have it if you'll get it out of here by the weekend and clean up the oil and grease around where it was". Gil said, "Okay", even though he knew the engine was worth nearly $1200. Is this a valid contract?
Answer:
Yes it is valid.
Explanation:
In the context, it is given that Gil found an engine that was lying in his neighbor's garage. Gil asked the neighbor for the engine and also offered money. But his neighbor said to have the engine without any cost but on one condition. The condition is that Gil have to take away the engine by the weekend and also he has to clean the garage where there is oil slipping from the engine. Though the engine worth nearly 1200 dollar, but Gil said he will take the engine by the end of the weekend and will clean the garage for the neighbor. Therefore it is valid contract.
There are different kinds of contract. This is a valid contract.
Not that the above contract is a a real contract that can be held up in a court of law so therefore, it a valid contract.
There are different basic elements needed for the agreement to be a legally enforceable that is to be a valid contract. They are:
Mutual assentAdequate considerationLegality etc.Learn more about valid contract from
https://brainly.com/question/8116487
Essential Questions: How do interest groups/lobbyists support the legislative process? Does the role that interest groups play represent what the founder
envisioned for the rights to free speech, assembly & petition or a hi-jacking of the legislative process?
Answer:
assembly & petition
Explanation:
Keralyn creates a Web site for Stuart as discussed in the contract for $1000. When it is completed, Stuart likes it but decided he wanted to make material changes. Keralyn agrees to do and charges an additional $500. Keralyn is correct and is entitled to the additional payment because
Answer:
Because its cost money to do things like make material changes
The owner of a sole proprietorship declares any profits earned by the company on his personal income tax at the end of the year.
True/False
Answer:
True
Explanation: this is Correct!
list four ways by which a contract may be discharged/ terminated
Answer: There are four ways in which a contract can be discharged. They are by performance, agreement, repudiation and frustration.
There are four ways to dissolve or end a contract. These are terminated by performance, breach, agreement, and frustration.
What is a contract?An enforceable legal agreement known as a contract defines, specifies, and governs the parties rights and obligations. Contracts frequently include the promise to transmit goods, services, money, or any combination of those at a later date.
In the event of a contract violation, the harmed party may pursue legal remedies such as damages or rescission. The core principle of contract law, a division of the law of obligations that deals with contracts, is that agreements must be upheld.
The law provides the harmed party with remedies in the event that a promise is broken. These remedies are typically in the form of monetary compensation or, in exceptional circumstances, explicit fulfillment of the broken promise.
Learn more about contracts, from:
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
someone who operates within the law, representing persons before administrative agencies that permit this practice is known as a .
Answer:
Explanation:
Generally, a legal technician is someone acting outside of the law, providing direct services to the public, whereas a lay advocate is operating within the law, representing persons before administrative agencies.
this case would be a case of select answer in california. without the prior guidance, the california courts likely would look to select answer authorities to help them reason through a decision.
This case would be a case of FIRST IMPRESSION in California. Without prior guidance, the California courts likely would look to PERSUASIVE authorities to help them reason through a decision.
A case of first impression in California would occur if the United States Supreme Court had not issued the prior opinion and California courts also had not decided that those clauses contravene a strong public policy.
To make it clear, without prior guidance or direction, the courts would probably turn to eloquent authorities to aid in decision-making process and if the supreme court had not previously rendered its opinion and local courts had not also determined the violation of a substantial public regulation, there would be a prima facie case or case of first impression.
Learn more about the three types of persuasive authority which judges may use in cases of first impression: https://brainly.com/question/8466229
For everyone's information, the questions supposedly had the following format:
Fill in the blanks. What if the United States Supreme Court had not issued the prior opinion and California courts also had not decided that those clauses contravene a strong public policy? This case would be a case of ____ in California. Without the prior guidance, the California courts likely would look to ____ authorities to help them reason through a decision.
#SPJ4
How important the Principle of Equality in our society?
Answer:
Truly equal and fair societies are more likely to be prosperous and harmonious ones. Failure to tackle discrimination and to provide equal opportunities hurts individuals and families, negatively impacts our society, and costs the economy
Answer:
Equality helps t solve discrimination in the society. When there is no discrimination the society can lead towards the path of peace and prosperity
An optionor and optionee make a contract for an option on a commercial piece of property. If the optionee decides to exercise his option, when must he perform?
Answer:
He must exercise his option under the terms of the option contract. Illumination: Options are generally concerned with only two things: time and price. He must exercise his option under the terms of the option contract
Scenario:
A new piece of equipment has arrived and your supervisor is anxious to put it to use. You can usually figure out how to operate
equipment, but you've never used this before. Your supervisor hands you the manual and says, "Ok, get started!" As he walks off, he turns and says, "Oh, and be careful." You understand the urgency, but are nervous about using the new equipment.
Question:
Which of these employee rights might affect what you do? Select the rights you think are most relevant to your solution.
- Right to rules and regulation
- Right to training
- Right to non-retaliation
- Right to data access
- Right to promote safety
- Right to inspections
The following Scenario "Right to training" is the most relevant employee rights.
Rights are basic normative norms regarding what is permitted of individuals or due to people in accordance with some legal system, social custom, or ethical theory. Rights are therefore legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement. In fields like law and ethics, especially in notions of justice and deontology, rights are fundamentally important.
Any civilization must have rights, and attempts to define and reinterpret them frequently recur throughout social conflict history. Rights "determine the form of governments, the substance of laws, and the shape of morality as it is now viewed," according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
To know more about Rights here
https://brainly.com/question/2775117
#SPJ1
liability is a feature of political systems in which a body of law is in place that permits individuals to recover damages done to them by others actos, systems, or organisations.
Liability is a feature of political systems in which a body of law is in place that permits individuals to recover damages done to them by others' acts, systems, or organizations: TRUE
What is liability?Liability is a feature of political systems in which a set of laws exists to allow individuals to recover damages caused by other actors, systems, or organizations. Ethics and liability can be linked in two ways: normatively and empirically. Generally, we can consider a liability rule "ethical" if it places responsibility on a party who we believe should be held accountable in a given situation. Liability is fundamentally about apportioning blame. Product liability involves a manufacturer's or vendor's obligation to compensate for injuries caused by faulty merchandise sold.Therefore, the statement "liability is a feature of political systems in which a body of law is in place that permits individuals to recover damages done to them by others' acts, systems, or organizations" is TRUE.
Know more about liability here:
https://brainly.com/question/8909067
#SPJ4
If someone is discriminated by a law based on gender, the burden is on the state to show that the law is substantially related to an important government purpose. This would require which level of scrutiny?
Courts utilize strict scrutiny as a type of judicial review to assess whether specific legislation is constitutional. When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny.
What part of the Constitution protects against discrimination?The 14th Amendment, which ensures "equal protection of the laws," has been interpreted by a strong majority of the U.S. Supreme Court to include safeguards against sex discrimination. This is first seen in the 1971 landmark decision Reed v.
No state shall enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no state shall rob anybody of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no state shall refuse to any person within its borders the equal protection of the laws.
Learn more about Discrimination By Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/14896067
#SPJ1
Write the letter of the correct answer u
1. Which amendment says the government
must follow due process of law before
punishing a person for committing a
crime?
A. 1st Amendment
B. Sth Amendment
C. 8th Amendment
D. 14th Amendment
THIS IS WORTH 25 POINTS
Which of the following is not true?
a) During a court proceeding, the judge is there to decide questions of law.
b) After trial, on appeal, only issues or questions of law can be appealed.
c) During a trial that is not a bench (or non-jury) trial, it is the jury that decides
questions or issues of fact.
d) During a trial to achieve justice, the judge and the jury can consult and
collaborate to decide either issues of law or of facts.
e) None of the preceding answers, a) thru d), is a correct answer to the question.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D. During a trial to achieve justice, the judge and the jury can consult and collaborate to decide either issues of law or of facts.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Is the presidents power found in Article 2 or the Oath of Office
Answer:
It would be found in Article 2
A sample of dna was incorrectly collected and sealed in a plastic container. What is likely to impact the integrity of the evidence based on this storage method?.
The integrity of the evidence based on this storage method should be frozen as soon as possible to impact.
Evidence
Evidence is what validates beliefs or makes it rational to hold a specific doxastic attitude in epistemology. A perceptual experience of a tree, for example, may serve as evidence to support the idea that there is a tree. Evidence is typically considered in this position as a private mental state. Important issues in this discipline include the nature of these mental states, such as whether they must be propositional and whether deceptive mental states can still qualify as evidence.
In a dry state, DNA is extremely stable. The principal destructors of the DNA molecule are ultraviolet radiation, intense heat, and high humidity. For the appropriate collecting, packaging, and storage of DNA evidence, a few basic guidelines must be followed.
To learn more about Evidence
https://brainly.com/question/25658352
#SPJ4
Consider Antigone's equating "final Justice" with the "immortal unrecorded laws of
God." How might a kind of "Euthyphro question" be applied to that idea, and how
might Socrates react?
Socrates, the Socratic Method is a dialogue between the teacher and the students, which is instigated by the continual questioning and investigation of the teacher. This dialogue is an effort to investigate the underlying beliefs that shape the student's views and opinions. Socrates, the Socratic Method was named after Socrates.
This is further explained below.
Who is Socrates?Generally, The most useful true knowledge, according to Socrates during the trial, consists in realizing that you are ignorant of everything.
Socrates prioritized education throughout his life because he held the view that "the power to distinguish between good and wrong lay in people's motivation today, not in society."
For Socrates, getting to know someone was the most important aspect.
The Socratic method often referred to as the Elenchus method, the elenctic method, or the Socratic debate is a cooperative arguing discussion style focused on questions and responses that draw out ideas and underlying presuppositions.
See here for additional information about Socrates:
https://brainly.com/question/12714002
#SPJ1
Which of the following best describes the role of local police officers as peacekeepers?
Answer:
Somalia
Explanation:
The peacekeeping expeditions are the ones where there's interventions in countries where there is unrest and conflicts. If the situation is that there is danger for the lives of the innocent civilians in a country because of some political, ethnic, religious interest, and people are killed because of it, the peacekeeping expeditions are almost inevitable. Somalia is a country of that type, where the everyday life represents a huge danger for the people, as they can end up injured or dead without any particular reason and not being involved themselves in anything. A peacekeeping expedition is a logical thing to do to secure the people in this African nation and bring things in order gradually.