Read the quotation from a university professor in Saudi Arabia.



We are part of the global world now. Whether we like it or not, and regardless of our political and religious systems, there are changes seeping through our lives.



–Amira Kashgary,


Quoted in "New Saudi Arabia University Will Have a Western Feel,"


by Jeffrey Fleishman



Which of these might be the most logical action for Saudi Arabians who agree with the professor?



learning to speak English


buying a telephone


studying their nation’s history


traveling to a neighboring country

There were several reasons why some Mexican citizens might not have been pleased with Enrique Peña Nieto's election as president of Mexico in 2012. Here are a few possible reasons:

His party's history: Peña Nieto belonged to the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which had a long history of corruption, authoritarianism, and human rights abuses during its 71 years in power before losing the presidency in 2000. Some citizens may have been wary of returning to a party with such a tainted past.

Controversies during his campaign: Peña Nieto's campaign was marred by several controversies, including allegations of vote-buying, media manipulation, and corruption. Some citizens may have felt that he was not a legitimate or trustworthy leader.

His record as governor: Before running for president, Peña Nieto was governor of the state of Mexico from 2005 to 2011. His tenure was criticized for high levels of violence, human rights abuses, and corruption. Some citizens may have felt that he was not capable of addressing these issues at a national level.

To know more about  president here

https://brainly.com/question/924435

#SPJ4

Answer:

Andrew Jackson, the seventh President of the United States, was known for his controversial policies and actions that harmed certain groups of Americans during his time in office. Here are some of the groups of Americans who were harmed by Jackson's policies and actions:

1. Native Americans: Perhaps the group that was most harmed by Jackson during his time in office were Native Americans. Jackson was a strong proponent of Indian removal, and he signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, which forced many Native American tribes to leave their ancestral lands and move to reservations in the West. This policy resulted in the forced displacement and suffering of tens of thousands of Native Americans, and it is now widely regarded as a dark chapter in American history.

2. African Americans: Although Jackson was not an advocate for slavery, he was a slave owner himself, and his policies did little to address the injustices faced by African Americans during this time. Jackson did not support the abolitionist movement, and he signed the Indian Removal Act into law despite concerns that it would lead to the expansion of slavery into new territories.

3. Women: Jackson's policies and actions did little to advance the cause of women's rights during this time. He did not support women's suffrage or other reforms that would have given women greater political or social power.

Additionally, there were several groups of Americans who were potentially harmed by Jackson's policies and actions during this time. These groups included:

1. Small farmers and workers: Jackson's economic policies favored wealthy landowners and industrialists, which could have potentially harmed small farmers and workers who did not have the same level of political or economic power.

2. Immigrants: Although Jackson did not have a specific policy on immigration, his rhetoric and actions could have potentially contributed to a climate of xenophobia and discrimination against immigrants.

3. Non-Christians: Jackson was a devout Christian, and his policies and actions could have potentially marginalized non-Christian groups, particularly those who practiced non-Western religions.

Overall, while Jackson's policies and actions had a significant impact on Native Americans and other marginalized groups, there were also several other groups of Americans who were potentially harmed by his policies and actions during this time.

Explanation:

There were several reasons why many African Americans failed to heed Robert Kennedy's plea for moderation after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated.

To know more about African Americans refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/24318057

#SPJ11

Capitalism and socialism are two economic systems that have different approaches to resource allocation, ownership, and control.

One of the key differences between capitalism and socialism is the ownership of the means of production. In capitalism, individuals and corporations own the means of production, and they are free to operate in the market without interference from the state.

socialism advocates for the collective ownership and control of resources. The state is responsible for ensuring that resources are distributed equally among all members of society, and individuals have equal access to education, healthcare, & other public services.

One piece of evidence for socialism is the success of countries like Sweden and Denmark, which have developed strong welfare states with high levels of social & economic equality.

communism has also been associated with authoritarianism & the suppression of individual freedoms, as seen in the Soviet Union & North Korea.

Capitalism, on the other hand, has been criticized for creating economic inequality & promoting a culture of greed and materialism. In contrast, socialism has been criticized for stifling innovation and entrepreneurship and creating a culture of dependency on the state.

To know more about Capitalism-

brainly.com/question/28218484

#SPJ1

The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was concerned with communist influence in Hollywood because they believed that members of the Communist Party were infiltrating the film industry in order to spread the party's political message.

HUAC wanted to interrogate the Hollywood Ten, a group of film professionals who refused to answer questions about their possible involvement with the Communist Party. I do not agree with the refusal of the Hollywood Ten to answer HUAC's questions because it is important to ensure that the US is not being infiltrated by a foreign ideology.

However, I do understand why they refused to answer since they did not want to risk being accused of being communists and potentially losing their jobs. Furthermore, I believe that HUAC should have done more research before trying to publicly interrogate the Hollywood Ten.

To know more about Communist Party, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/9681311

#SPJ4

Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political philosopher, historian, and writer.

He was born in Paris, France, on July 29, 1805, and died on April 16, 1859. Tocqueville is best known for his works on democracy and the political system in the United States.

In 1831, Tocqueville and his friend Gustave de Beaumont traveled to the United States to study the American prison system, but they also used their time to observe American society and politics. Their observations led Tocqueville to write his most famous work, "Democracy in America," which was published in two volumes in 1835 and 1840. In this work, Tocqueville analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of American democracy and predicted that democracy would become the dominant form of government in the world.

Tocqueville was also a supporter of liberal democracy, individualism, and the rule of law. He believed that democracy needed to be balanced by individual rights and the protection of minorities. Tocqueville's ideas and writings had a significant influence on political philosophy and the development of democratic institutions around the world.

In conclusion, Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political philosopher, historian, and writer who is best known for his work on democracy in America. He was a supporter of liberal democracy, individualism, and the rule of law, and his ideas and writings had a significant impact on political philosophy and the development of democratic institutions worldwide.

To learn more about Alexis de Tocqueville, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1495723

#SPJ11

German laws during the 1930s had a devastating impact on the Jewish population. Beginning in 1933 with the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, Jewish people were systematically excluded from many professions and stripped of their citizenship rights.

The Nuremberg Laws of 1935 further restricted their civil liberties, prohibiting Jews from marrying non-Jewish Germans, attending schools and universities, and owning businesses. These laws led to widespread persecution, violence, and eventually, the genocide of six million Jews during the Holocaust.

The impact of German laws on the Jewish population was catastrophic, leaving a lasting legacy of trauma and loss.

To know more about citizenship rights, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/14160229#

#SPJ11

The causes of fear and uncertainty before WW2 include economic instability, political polarization, expansionist policies, the failure of the League of Nations, the belief in the inevitability of war, and memories of WW1.

The causes and effects of fear and uncertainty before WW2. Here are six causes and their corresponding effects:

1. Cause: Economic instability during the Great Depression.
Effect: The high unemployment rates and financial hardships led to social unrest and desperation, making it easier for extremist political movements to gain support.

2. Cause: Political polarization and the rise of totalitarian regimes.
Effect: The establishment of dictatorships in countries like Germany, Italy, and Japan increased international tensions and contributed to an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty.

3. Cause: Expansionist policies pursued by Germany, Italy, and Japan.
Effect: These aggressive territorial ambitions led to increased military spending and the violation of international treaties, further fueling global tensions.

4. Cause: Failure of the League of Nations to prevent conflicts.
Effect: The ineffectiveness of the League in addressing aggressions from Germany, Italy, and Japan weakened global trust in diplomatic solutions, leading to a greater sense of fear and uncertainty.

5. Cause: Widespread belief in the inevitability of war.
Effect: The pervasive notion that another world war was unavoidable contributed to a self-fulfilling prophecy, as countries prepared for conflict and became increasingly distrustful of one another.

6. Cause: Collective memories of the horrors of World War 1.
Effect: The fear of a repeat of the devastating consequences of the First World War drove nations to desperately search for ways to avoid or prepare for another global conflict, often exacerbating the tensions that led to WW2.

In summary, the causes of fear and uncertainty before WW2 include economic instability, political polarization, expansionist policies, the failure of the League of Nations, the belief in the inevitability of war, and memories of WW1.

These factors contributed to a global atmosphere of tension, mistrust, and apprehension that eventually led to the outbreak of the Second World War.

To know more about WW2 refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/7013432#

#SPJ11

Answer:

"The purpose of government is to enable the people of a nation to live in safety and happiness. Government exists for the interests of the governed, not for the governors." - Thomas Jefferson

Essay:

I wholeheartedly agree with Thomas Jefferson's statement that the purpose of government is to enable the people of a nation to live in safety and happiness. In my view, the primary role of government should be to serve and protect its citizens, ensuring their well-being and fostering an environment that allows for personal and collective growth.

First and foremost, the government must ensure the safety and security of its citizens. This includes maintaining law and order, protecting individual rights and freedoms, and safeguarding the nation against external threats. Without a stable and secure environment, people cannot fully enjoy their lives, pursue their ambitions, or contribute to society. Therefore, it is essential for the government to prioritize the safety of its citizens.

Moreover, the government should work towards creating conditions that promote happiness and well-being among its people. This involves providing essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. By investing in these areas, the government can improve the overall quality of life and create equal opportunities for all citizens. It is the duty of the government to ensure that basic needs are met and that every individual has a fair chance to succeed and thrive.

Furthermore, government should serve the interests of the governed rather than those in power. This means that policies and decisions should be made with the welfare of the people in mind, rather than catering to the whims and desires of a select few. A government that truly serves its citizens listens to their concerns, addresses their needs, and acts in their best interests. Transparency, accountability, and active citizen participation are crucial in ensuring that the government remains responsive and responsible.

However, it is important to note that the extent of government involvement and the specific policies implemented may vary depending on the cultural, social, and economic context of a nation. Different countries may have different interpretations of how best to achieve safety, happiness, and citizen empowerment. Nevertheless, the overarching goal remains the same: to create a government that is by the people, for the people.

In conclusion, I agree with Thomas Jefferson's perspective on the purpose of government. A government's primary responsibility should be to enable the safety and happiness of its people. By prioritizing the well-being of citizens, ensuring their security, and serving their interests, governments can create an environment where individuals can live fulfilling lives and contribute to the betterment of society as a whole.

to show only the good things about that country

The large number of undocumented or "not specified" immigrants entering the United States from 1841-1860 can be attributed to several factors like lack of strict immigration laws, economic and political factors in Europe, improved transportation options, and the high demand for labor in the growing American economy.

Firstly, during this time period, there were no strict immigration laws or a centralized system to track and document immigrants, leading to many people entering the country without official records.

Secondly, there was a significant influx of European immigrants, especially from Ireland and Germany, due to economic hardships and political turmoil in their home countries. Many of these immigrants arrived in the United States seeking better opportunities and did not have the necessary documentation or means to enter through official channels.

Additionally, the expansion of transportation options, such as steamships and railroads, facilitated easier access to the United States, enabling more immigrants to enter the country without being properly documented.

Finally, the United States experienced rapid economic growth during this period, creating a high demand for labor in industries such as agriculture, mining, and manufacturing. This demand encouraged more immigrants to enter the country in search of work, often without proper documentation.

To know more about immigrants refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31115986#

#SPJ11

America has been characterized as "isolationist" and "neutral" during the 1920s & 1930s. To assess the extent to which this is accurate, we should look at specific policies and events from that time period.

Firstly, the term "isolationist" refers to the United States' decision to distance itself from international affairs, particularly in Europe. This is evident in the 1920s when the U.S. rejected the League of Nations and refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I.

Additionally, the country pursued protectionist economic policies, such as the Fordney-McCumber Tariff of 1922 and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930, which aimed to protect domestic industries by raising import tariffs.

As for the term "neutral," this is primarily associated with the U.S. policy during the 1930s, especially in response to the rise of fascist and militarist regimes in Europe and Asia.

The Neutrality Acts of 1935, 1936, and 1937 were passed to prevent American involvement in foreign conflicts by prohibiting the sale of arms, loans, and other assistance to belligerent nations. This neutrality stance was maintained until the U.S. entry into World War II in 1941.

In conclusion, the characterization of America as "isolationist" and "neutral" during the 1920s & 1930s is accurate to some extent. The U.S. chose to avoid entanglements in international affairs and maintain neutrality during conflicts, though this stance shifted as the global situation became more dire.

To know more about isolationism refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30123541#

#SPJ11

Urban riots are a characteristic of the urban centers in the Indus River valley. Therefore, option (A) is correct.

The Indus River valley is frequently referred to as Harappan after its type site Harappa, which was the first to be discovered early in the 20th century in what is now Punjab, Pakistan, but was then the Punjab province of British India.

The conclusion of work that started following the establishment of the Archaeological Survey Urban riots  of India in the British Raj in 1861 was the discovery of Harappa and, shortly after, Mohenjo daro.

In the same region, there were Early Harappan and Late Harappan cultures.

Learn more about Indus River valley, from :

brainly.com/question/18748104

#SPJ1

Jonah's argument makes sense because typically, jobs that involve manual labor and working outside tend to pay higher wages than jobs in the food service industry.

Collecting trash for the city is a physically demanding job, and as such, it is likely to pay more than working at an ice cream shop. Additionally, working for the city may offer benefits such as paid time off and healthcare, which are not typically offered to employees in the food service industry.

Therefore, Jonah's decision to apply for a job collecting trash with the city is a reasonable one if he is looking to maximize his earnings over the summer.

To know more about manual labor visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27989981

#SPJ11

Answer:

Faith

Explanation:

One of the changes in the nature of rural consumption in the late 19th century was the increased availability and affordability of manufactured goods due to the consolidation of manufacturing in large cities and the expansion of the railroad system.

As transportation improved, rural Americans were able to access a wider variety of goods that were previously only available in urban areas.

This led to a shift in the types of goods that rural Americans consumed, with a greater emphasis on consumer products such as clothing, household appliances, and packaged foods. Additionally, the expansion of advertising and mail-order catalogs made it easier for rural Americans to learn about and purchase these new goods.

This change in the nature of consumption had significant social and economic implications, as it contributed to the development of a national consumer culture and facilitated the growth of new industries.

To know more about railroad system visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20129387

#SPJ11

The correct sequence of events is B, C, A. St. Patrick was kidnapped by raiders, which caused him to change his name.

After he changed his name, he established churches in Ireland. This sequence of events shows how St. Patrick's life experiences led him to become an influential figure in Christianity in Ireland.

He was able to use his experiences to spread the message of Christianity, leading to the establishment of churches in Ireland. It is also important to note that St. Patrick's life was not easy, and his courage in the face of adversity is an example for us all.

To know more about Christianity , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3749222

#SPJ4

Early in the Civil War, the North's strong navy helped it to establish a blockade. However, the South was winning land battles because it had better military leadership.

The North's strong navy enabled them to enforce the Anaconda Plan, which aimed to blockade Southern ports and cut off supplies. This blockade severely limited the South's ability to trade and obtain essential resources.

However, despite this advantage, the South had superior military leadership, with skilled commanders such as Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.

These experienced leaders were adept at executing successful military strategies, which contributed to the South's initial success in many land battles during the early stages of the Civil War.

To know more about Civil War click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/11874600#

#SPJ11

Answer: The goal of Nazi propaganda was to demonize Jews and to create a climate of hostility and indifference toward their plight. On Kristallnacht—the Night of Broken

Explanation:

sad days

When offspring plants were allowed to self-pollinate, the offspring displayed a mix of dominant and recessive traits.

In a classic experiment by Gregor Mendel, he cross-pollinated pea plants with different traits (e.g., tall vs short) and found that the first generation (F1) offspring showed only the dominant trait (e.g., tall).

However, when these F1 offspring were allowed to self-pollinate, the second generation (F2) offspring displayed a mix of both dominant (tall) and recessive (short) traits.

Mendel observed a 3:1 ratio of dominant to recessive traits in the F2 generation, which led to the foundation of modern genetics and the principles of inheritance, including dominant and recessive alleles, and how they are passed on to offspring.

To know more about recessive traits click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/17447924#

#SPJ11

The U.S. military deployed troops to Lebanon during Ronald Reagan's presidency to secure peace between Israel and Palestinian militants. The deployment was part of a multinational peacekeeping force that was established to help end the civil war in Lebanon and to oversee the withdrawal of Palestinian fighters from the country. The goal of the U.S. military was to help restore stability to the region and to prevent further violence between Israeli and Palestinian forces. While the mission was initially successful, it was later derailed by a series of bombings that targeted the multinational force, leading to the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the country.

Answer:

When Gandhi speaks of the "cultural conquest" of India, he is referring to the idea that India was facing a cultural invasion by Western powers, particularly the British. Gandhi believed that the British were not only imposing their political and economic system on India, but also their cultural values, such as materialism and individualism.

Explanation:

In essence, Gandhi was calling for a cultural revolution in India, one that would involve rejecting the Western values and practices that had been imposed on the country, and embracing a more authentic, traditional way of life that was rooted in Indian culture and spirituality. He believed that this cultural renewal was essential for India to achieve true independence and self-determination.

Answer: When Gandhi speaks of the "cultural conquest" of India, he is referring to the idea that India was facing a cultural invasion by Western powers, particularly the British. Gandhi believed that the British were not only imposing their political and economic system on India, but also their cultural values, such as materialism and individualism

Explanation: i got this from wikapeda

The three statements that describe Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are:

They were responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings.

They claimed to want revenge for attacks on Muslims.

They killed a police officer while stealing his car.

Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were two brothers who were responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings on April 15, 2013. The bombings killed three people and injured hundreds more. The Tsarnaev brothers, who were originally from Chechnya, claimed that they were motivated by a desire to avenge the deaths of Muslims who had been killed by US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. This statement highlights their belief in violent extremism and retaliation against the United States.

During their attempt to flee, the Tsarnaev brothers killed an MIT police officer, Sean Collier, and later engaged in a shootout with police in Watertown, Massachusetts. Tamerlan was killed during the shootout, while Dzhokhar was eventually captured and put on trial.

While the Tsarnaev brothers claimed to be acting on behalf of a larger terrorist organization, there is no evidence to suggest that they were part of any such organization. Instead, they are believed to have acted independently in planning and executing the Boston Marathon bombings.

The Tsarnaev brothers' actions highlight the dangers of violent extremism and the potential for individuals to carry out attacks without the support of a larger organization. The Boston Marathon bombings were a tragic reminder of the need for increased vigilance and security measures to prevent future attacks.

The Tsarnaev brothers' case also highlighted the importance of effective law enforcement and intelligence gathering in identifying and stopping individuals who may be planning violent attacks.

To learn more about Tamerlan refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/472242

#SPJ11

Answer: Bantu speakers entered southern Uganda probably by the end of the first millennium A.D.  

Explanation: for PLATO

The Dixiecrats were members of the Southern Democratic Party who walked out of the 1948 convention to form the "States' Rights Democratic Party".

The correct option is D.

The Dixiecrats were a reaction to the Civil Rights Movement, which was gaining momentum in the South. The party was led by Strom Thurmond, a former South Carolina governor, who was opposed to integration and wanted to maintain segregation in the South. The Dixiecrats platform was based on states' rights, which meant allowing states to decide how civil rights and other issues were handled without federal intervention.

They also wanted to protect the South’s economy and way of life from the effects of federal civil rights legislation. They also wanted to preserve the traditional roles of men and women in the South. The Dixiecrats were unsuccessful in their attempts to gain the White House, but their efforts did help to galvanize the segregationist movement in the South.

The correct option is D.

To know more about Dixiecrats , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29437418

#SPJ4

It requires you to research more about each contribution and ideas of such historical figures, to imagine what an afternoon tea with Martin Luther, Columbus, Halilei, King Louis IX, Empress Catherine the Great and Leonardo da Vinci could be like.

Each of these personalities contributed ideas and inventions that revolutionized human history, such as Martin Luther who developed Protestantism and Leonardo da Vinci who revolutionized the world with his works of art and scientific developments.

Therefore, for such an activity, you can research in books, documents and articles about each of the individuals, their ideas, personality and innovations that contributed to the development and transformation of society.

Find out more about Martin Luther at:

https://brainly.com/question/885736

#SPJ1

A lawsuit against a school that refused admission to an African-American student mirrors the important U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

Option C is correct

In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public schools based on race was unconstitutional, overturning the "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). The case was brought by African-American parents in Kansas who sued the local school board for refusing to admit their children to white schools.

Similarly, a lawsuit against a school that refused admission to an African-American student challenges racial segregation in education, which was the core issue in Brown v. Board of Education. The case demonstrates the importance of equal access to education regardless of race, and the role of the courts in protecting the constitutional rights of individuals.

Option C is correct

To know more about  supreme court    here

https://brainly.com/question/341135

#SPJ4

Based on the information, we can infer that the diagram is completed with the option about Thomas Paine's pamphlet to reclaim their natural rights (option A).

To identify the sentence that completes the diagram, we must take into account that this diagram has sentences about the independence of the United States in a chronological order. According to the above, the first statement is a cause of the second statement, and the second statement is a cause of the third statement.

From the above, we can infer that the most accurate statement for this context would be:

These three declarations are related chronologically to the independence of the United States as facts related in cause and effect.

Note: This question is incomplete. Here is the complete information:

A. An early draft of Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence

circulates widely through colonial newspapers.

B. A popular pamphlet written by Thomas Paine calls for Americans

to reclaim their natural rights.

C. Several American lawyers bring a well-publicized lawsuit against

Britain for denying their inalienable rights.

D. Colonists propose that King George III sign a social contract

limiting his influence in the colonies.

Learn more about Thomas Paine in: https://brainly.com/question/5953344

#SPJ1

Woodrow Wilson criticized the Declaration of Independence and Constitution for being outdated, while opponents argued that they were timeless and adaptable.

In his 1913 piece "What is Progress?", Woodrow Wilson criticized the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as political guides. He argued that they were outdated and unable to address the problems of modern society. He contended that these documents were designed to serve the interests of white, male property owners and did not take into account the changing social and economic realities of the 20th century.

Wilson argued that society had become more complex and that new methods of organization and cooperation were necessary to address the problems of the day. He suggested that a new vision of progress was needed, one that focused on cooperation, rather than competition, and that emphasized the role of the state in promoting the general welfare.

However, some scholars and historians have criticized Wilson's view. They argue that the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are timeless and continue to provide a solid foundation for American political thought and practice. They contend that the principles of individual rights and limited government have served as a check on government power and have provided a framework for democratic governance.

Furthermore, some have argued that Wilson's view fails to recognize the importance of the American political tradition, which has evolved over time to reflect changing social and economic conditions. They argue that American democracy is not static, but rather, is a dynamic system that is capable of adapting to new challenges and opportunities.

In conclusion, while Wilson's criticism of the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution may have been valid in some respects, many scholars and historians have challenged his view and argue that these documents continue to serve as important political guides in American society.

To learn more about Woodrow Wilson refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29888956

#SPJ11