QUESTION IN PICTURE

Please explain your answer in steps, thank you.

Answer:

Area of triangle = (1/2)(12²) = (1/2)(144) = 72

Area of circle = π(12²) = 144π

P(point falls in triangle) = 72/(144π)

= 1/(2π)

= about .16

= about 15.92%

       Hence,  The solution is:  

        x   =     1

        y   =  - 2

        z   =     2

Step-by-step explanation:

        3x  +  y  =  1

        x  -  y  +  z  =  5

        3x  +  y  +  z  =  3

        x  +  y  =  -1

        x  +  y  =   -1

        3x  +  y  =  1

        x   =   1

        y  =  -2

        1   -  (-2)  +   z    =   5

        z    =   2

       Hence, The Solution is:   x  =  1,   y  =  -2,    z   =  2

I hope this helps you!

The solution to the equation [tex]3^x + 3^(4-2x) = 1 + 3^(4-x) is x = 2.[/tex]

To solve the equation [tex]3^x + 3^(4-2x) = 1 + 3^(4-x),[/tex] we can simplify the equation and then apply some algebraic techniques to isolate the variable x.

First, let's simplify the equation step by step:

1. Notice that [tex]3^(4-2x)[/tex] can be rewritten as[tex](3^4) / (3^2x)[/tex], using the property of exponentiation.

2. Now the equation becomes 3[tex]^x + (81 / 9^x) = 1 + 3^(4-x).[/tex]

3. We can simplify further by multiplying both sides of the equation by 9^x to eliminate the denominators.

  This gives us [tex]3^x * 9^x + 81 = 9^x + 3^(4-x) * 9^x.[/tex]

4. Simplifying the terms, we have [tex](3*9)^x + 81 = 9^x + (3*9)^(4-x).[/tex]

  Now we have [tex](27)^x + 81 = 9^x + (27)^(4-x).[/tex]

5. Notice that [tex](27)^x and (27)^(4-x)[/tex] have the same base, so we can set the exponents equal to each other.

  This gives us x = 4 - x.

6. Simplifying the equation, we get 2x = 4.

7. Dividing both sides of the equation by 2, we have x = 2.

Therefore, the solution to the equation [tex]3^x + 3^(4-2x) = 1 + 3^(4-x) is x = 2.[/tex]

Using simple language, we simplified the equation step by step and isolated the variable x by setting the exponents equal to each other. The final solution is x = 2.

for more such question on equation  visit

https://brainly.com/question/17145398

#SPJ8

The missing statement 4 of the two column proof of AD ║ BC is:

Statement 4: m∠1 + m∠4 = 180°

The complete two column proof to show that AD || BC is as follows:

Statement 1: AD ║ DC

Reason 1: Given

Statement 2: m∠2 = m∠4

Reason 2: Given

Statement 3: ∠1 and ∠3 are supplements

Reason 3: Same side interior angles theorem

Statement 4: m∠1 + m∠4 = 180°

Reason 4: Def. of Supplementary angles

Statement 5: m∠1 + m∠2 = 180°

Reason 5: Substitution

Statement 6: ∠1 and ∠2 are supplements

Reason 6: Def. of Supplementary angles

Statement 7: AD ║ BC

Reason 7: Converse same side interior angles thm

Read more about Two Column Proof at: https://brainly.com/question/1788884

#SPJ1

Answer:

Option (C), 8 am

Step-by-step explanation:

Newton's Law of Cooling is a mathematical model that describes the cooling process of an object. It states that the rate of change of temperature of an object is proportional to the difference between its temperature and the surrounding temperature.

The equation representing Newton's Law of Cooling is:

[tex]\dfrac{dT}{dt} = -k (T_0 - T_A)[/tex]

Where...

After solving the differential equation we get the following function:

[tex]T(t)=T_A+(T_0-T_A)e^{-kt}[/tex]

[tex]\hrulefill[/tex]

Given:

[tex]T_0=98.6 \ \textdegree F \ \text{(This is the average human body temperature)}\\\\T_f=T(t)=80\ \textdegree F \\\\T_A=40 \ \textdegree F \\\\k=0.1947[/tex]

Find:

[tex]T(??)= \ 80 \ \textdegree F[/tex]

Substituting the values into the formula:

[tex]T(t)=T_A+(T_0-T_A)e^{-kt}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow 80=40+(98.6-40)e^{-0.1947t}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow 80=40+58.6e^{-0.1947t}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow 40=58.6e^{-0.1947t}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow 0.682594=e^{-0.1947t}\\\\\\\Longrightarrow \ln(0.682594)=-0.1947t\\\\\\\Longrightarrow t=\dfrac{\ln(0.682594)}{-0.1947} \\\\\\\therefore \boxed{t \approx 2 \ \text{hours}}[/tex]

Thus, we can conclude the time of death was at 8 am.

Answer:

A+B+C=28

Step-by-step explanation:

let

A-B=2 -----1 EQUATION

B-C=7-------2

A+C=17------3

FROM 1 AND 2

A-C=9---------4

FROM 2 AND 3

A+B=24 -------5

FROM 3 AND 4

2A=26

A=13 SUBSTITUTING A=13 IN 5

WE GET B=11 SUBSTITUTING IT IN 2

WE GET C=4

NOW

A+B+C=13+11+4=28

The total volume of the dill spears is 425 cm³.

To find the total volume of the dill spears, we can subtract the volume of the pickle juice from the volume of the jar.

The jar is in the shape of a cylinder with a base area of 45 cm² and a height of 13 cm. Therefore, the volume of the jar can be calculated using the formula:

Volume of the jar = base area * height

Volume of the jar = 45 cm² * 13 cm

Volume of the jar = 585 cm³

Now, we know that the measuring cup collected 160 cm³ of pickle juice. So, we subtract this volume from the total volume of the jar to find the volume of the dill spears.

Volume of the dill spears = Volume of the jar - Volume of the pickle juice

Volume of the dill spears = 585 cm³ - 160 cm³

Volume of the dill spears = 425 cm³

Therefore, the total volume of the dill spears is 425 cm³.

for such more question on volume

https://brainly.com/question/6204273

#SPJ8

a. An equation to describe the total cost of RV rental:

Cost = (125 * d) + (0.32 * m) + 2500

b. Comparing the two costs will determine which option is cheaper.

c. For the more direct route: m ≤ 3500

For fewer overnight stays: d ≤ 14

These domains ensure that we don't exceed the original values for miles and days.

d. I recommend compromising by lessening the number of days of the rental. By reducing the rental period to 11 days, you can stay within the $5,000 budget while still allowing your little sister to take the two-week trip.

a. To write an equation for the total cost of RV rental, we can use the given information. The cost per day is $125, and there is an additional charge of 32 cents per mile. Let's denote the number of days as d and the number of miles as m. The equation for the total cost of RV rental can be written as:

Cost = (125 * d) + (0.32 * m) + 2500

b. To compare the costs of the two options, we need to calculate the total cost for each. Option 1 has 3500 miles and takes 11 days, while option 2 has 3000 miles and takes 14 days. We can substitute these values into the equation from part a to find the total costs for each option. Comparing the two costs will determine which option is cheaper.

c. To compromise and stay within a budget of $5,000, we can adjust either the number of miles or the number of days. For the more direct route, we can reduce the number of miles, and for fewer overnight stays, we can reduce the number of days. The domains for these compromises would be:

For the more direct route: m ≤ 3500

For fewer overnight stays: d ≤ 14

These domains ensure that we don't exceed the original values for miles and days.

d. To find the number of miles or days to eliminate in order to stay under the $5,000 budget, we can set up equations using the total cost equation from part a. Let's denote the reduced number of miles as m' and the reduced number of days as d'. We need to solve the following equation for each compromise:

(125 * d') + (0.32 * m') + 2500 ≤ 5000

By substituting the appropriate values into the equation and solving for m' or d', we can determine how many miles or days need to be eliminated.

Based on the given information, I recommend compromising by lessening the number of days of the rental. By reducing the rental period to 11 days, you can stay within the $5,000 budget while still allowing your little sister to take the two-week trip. This compromise ensures that you don't have to sacrifice too much scenic beauty or make drastic changes to the route.

For more such questions on total cost, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/5168855

#SPJ8

Step-by-step explanation:

a linear relationship or function is described in general as

y = f(x) = ax + b

Because the variable term has the variable x only with the exponent 1, this makes this a straight line - hence the name "linear".

here f(x) is P(x) :

P(x) = ax + b

now we are using both given points (ordered pairs) to calculate a and b :

20 = a×170 + b

2820 = a×220 + b

to eliminate first one variable we subtract equation 1 from equation 2 :

2800 = a×50

a = 2800/50 = 280/5 = 56

now, we use that in any of the 2 original equations to get b :

20 = 56×170 + b

b = 20 - 56×170 = 20 - 9520 = -9500

so,

P(x) = 56x - 9500

The surface area of the triangular pyramid is approximately 331.93 square yards.

To find the surface area of the triangular pyramid, we need to calculate the areas of its individual components and then sum them up.

The triangular pyramid has a base shaped like an equilateral triangle. The legs of the equilateral triangle are all 11 yards long, and the height of the equilateral triangle is 9.5 yards. The formula to calculate the area of an equilateral triangle is:

Area = (√3/4) * [tex]side^2[/tex]

Plugging in the values, we get:

Area of the base equilateral triangle = (√3/4) * 11^2 ≈ 52.43 square yards

The triangular pyramid also has three triangular faces. Each face is an isosceles triangle, with two sides measuring 11 yards (same as the sides of the base equilateral triangle) and a slant height of 17 yards. We can use the formula for the area of an isosceles triangle:

Area = (1/2) * base * height

Since the base of the isosceles triangle is 11 yards and the height is 17 yards, the area of each triangular face is:

Area of each triangular face = (1/2) * 11 * 17 = 93.5 square yards

Now, we can calculate the total surface area of the triangular pyramid by summing up the areas of the base and the three triangular faces:

Surface area = Area of the base equilateral triangle + 3 * Area of each triangular face

Surface area = 52.43 + 3 * 93.5

Surface area ≈ 331.93 square yards

For more such questions on triangular pyramid visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30517561

#SPJ8

The correct option that would be sufficient to prove the right triangles ∆WXZ and ∆WYX is (A) WZ/WX = XW/YW

The perpendicular height of the right triangle divides the triangle in two triangles with the same proportions as the original triangle.

Considering the smaller right triangle ∆WXZ and the bigger triangle ∆WYX;

the side WZ of ∆WXZ will correspond to the side WX of ∆WYX and similarly, side XW of ∆WXZ will correspond to the side of ∆WYX

so we can we the proportion as;

WZ/WX = XW/YW

Therefore, the proportion WZ/WX = XW/YW would be sufficient to prove the right triangles ∆WXZ and ∆WYX

Read more about right triangle here:https://brainly.com/question/2920412

#SPJ1

The answer is A. SAS.

If a parallelogram is given and we want to prove that ALMN is congruent to ANOL, we can use the SAS (Side-Angle-Side) postulate.

The SAS postulate states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.

In the case of the parallelogram, we know that AL is congruent to NO (opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent) and LM is congruent to OL (opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent). Additionally, angle LAM is congruent to angle LAO (opposite angles of a parallelogram are congruent).

By using the SAS postulate, we have two sides and the included angle that are congruent in both triangles. Therefore, we can conclude that triangle ALMN is congruent to triangle ANOL.

So, the answer is A. SAS.

for similar questions on parallelogram.

https://brainly.com/question/970600

#SPJ8

Answer:

6 is the sin

Step-by-step explanation:

The step length 'a' for the line search method at point x(k) = (1, -1) with the descent direction PL = (1, 0) is 0.5.

To compute the step length 'a' using the line search method, we can follow these steps:

1: Calculate the gradient at point x(k).

  - Given x(k) = (1, -1)

  - Compute the gradient ∇f(x₁,x₂) at x(k):

    ∇f(x₁,x₂) = (∂f/∂x₁, ∂f/∂x₂)

    ∂f/∂x₁ = 3x₁ + 1

    ∂f/∂x₂ = 2x₂ - 1

    Substituting x(k) = (1, -1):

    ∂f/∂x₁ = 3(1) + 1 = 4

    ∂f/∂x₂ = 2(-1) - 1 = -3

  - Gradient at x(k): ∇f(x(k)) = (4, -3)

2: Compute the dot product between the gradient and the descent direction.

  - Given PL = (1, 0)

  - Dot product: ∇f(x(k)) ⋅ PL = (4)(1) + (-3)(0) = 4

3: Compute the norm of the descent direction.

  - Norm of PL: ||PL|| = √(1² + 0²) = √1 = 1

4: Calculate the step length 'a'.

  - Step length formula: a = -∇f(x(k)) ⋅ PL / ||PL||²

    a = -4 / (1²) = -4 / 1 = -4

5: Take the absolute value of 'a' to ensure a positive step length.

  - Absolute value: |a| = |-4| = 4

6: Finalize the step length.

  - The step length 'a' is the positive value of |-4|, which is 4.

Therefore, the step length 'a' for the line search method at point x(k) = (1, -1) with the descent direction PL = (1, 0) is 4.

For more such questions on length, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/28322552

#SPJ8

The function is continuous in the domain x ≥ 3/4

Here we have a root function:

f(x) = ⁴√(4x - 3)

This is an even degree root function, so we have problems when the argument is negative.

Then the allowed values (where the function is defined, and thus, continuous) are:

4x - 3 ≥ 0

4x ≥ 3

x ≥ 3/4

There the function is continuous.

Learn more about continuous functions at:

https://brainly.com/question/18102431

#SPJ1

Withdrawal: If Henry decides to withdraw money from his bank account, the opposite quantity would be the amount he withdraws.

Transfer: If Henry transfers money from his account to another account, the opposite quantity would be the amount of the transfer.

Debit/Credit: If there are debit or credit transactions on Henry's account, the opposite quantity would depend on whether it is a debit (negative) or credit (positive) entry.

To determine the opposite quantity that makes Henry's balance, we need to know the specific transaction or action that affects the balance. Without further information, it is not possible to provide an exact answer.

However, I can explain a few scenarios based on common banking transactions that could result in an opposite quantity affecting Henry's balance:

1. Withdrawal: If Henry decides to withdraw money from his bank account, the opposite quantity would be the amount he withdraws. For example, if Henry withdraws $50 from his account, the opposite quantity would be -$50.

2. Transfer: If Henry transfers money from his account to another account, the opposite quantity would be the amount of the transfer. For instance, if Henry transfers $100 to another account, the opposite quantity would be -$100.

3. Debit/Credit: If there are debit or credit transactions on Henry's account, the opposite quantity would depend on whether it is a debit (negative) or credit (positive) entry.

It's important to note that these scenarios are examples, and the opposite quantity would vary depending on the specific transaction or action affecting Henry's balance. To accurately determine the opposite quantity, we would need more information about the specific transaction or action taken by Henry that impacts his account balance.

for more such question on money visit

https://brainly.com/question/24373500

#SPJ8

The sentence that best describes the paragraph is: "The pirates didn't believe Caesar would kill them because he was their prisoner." So, the correct option is c) Pirates didn’t believe Caesar will kill them because he was their prisoner.

The paragraph recounts the events of Caesar's kidnapping by pirates while crossing the Aegean Sea. Despite being held captive, Caesar maintained an attitude of superiority. The pirates demanded a ransom of 20 talents of silver, but Caesar insisted they ask for 50. This indicates that Caesar saw himself as more valuable than the initial ransom amount suggested by the pirates.

After the ransom was paid, Caesar did not forget the pirates' actions. He raised a fleet, pursued the pirates, and captured them. The sentence implies that the pirates didn't believe Caesar would actually kill them because he was their prisoner and they likely saw his promises as mere jest.

However, Caesar, true to his word, had the pirates crucified on his own authority.

This sequence of events highlights Caesar's determination, strategic thinking, and his ability to command respect even in dire circumstances. Despite being initially taken prisoner, he managed to turn the tables on the pirates, assert his authority, and exact his revenge. So, the correct option is c) Pirates didn’t believe Caesar will kill them because he was their prisoner.

For more such questions on prisoner

https://brainly.com/question/13802253

#SPJ8

Answer:

56) f(x) = c(x - 1)²/(x - 3)

f(0) = c/-3 = 4

c = -12

f(x) = -12(x - 1)²/(x - 3)

The x-intercepts of the function y = (x-5)(x+3) are 5 and -3.

To find the x-intercepts of the function y = (x-5)(x+3), we need to set y equal to zero and solve for x.

The x-intercepts are the values of x where the graph of the function intersects or crosses the x-axis.

Set y = 0:

0 = (x-5)(x+3)

Apply the zero-product property:

The product of two factors is equal to zero if and only if at least one of the factors is equal to zero.

Therefore, we can set each factor equal to zero and solve for x.

Setting x-5 = 0:

x - 5 = 0

x = 5

Setting x+3 = 0:

x + 3 = 0

x = -3.

The x-intercepts of the function y = (x-5)(x+3) are x = 5 and x = -3.

These are the values of x where the graph of the function crosses the x-axis.

For similar question on function.

https://brainly.com/question/27915724  

#SPJ8

The pairs of angles that are vertical angles in the figure are R and T.

In the figure provided, vertical angles are formed by the intersection of two lines. Vertical angles are always congruent (equal in measure) to each other.

Looking at the given options:

R and T are vertical angles because they are formed by the intersection of lines.

P and D are not vertical angles. They are adjacent angles formed by the intersection of lines, but they are not directly opposite each other.

Therefore, the pairs of angles that are vertical angles in the figure are:

R and T

for such more question on vertical angles

https://brainly.com/question/1821791

#SPJ8

Answer:

53)

[tex]f(x) = \frac{7(x - 4)(x + 6)}{(x + 4)(x + 5)} [/tex]

The equation of the ellipse with foci (7, 17) and (7, -13), and a major axis of length 34 is[tex](x^2/289) + (y^2/225) = 1.[/tex]

To determine the equation of an ellipse given its foci and the length of its major axis, we need to use the standard form equation for an ellipse. The standard form equation for an ellipse centered at the origin is:

[tex](x^2/a^2) + (y^2/b^2) = 1[/tex]

where 'a' represents the semi-major axis and 'b' represents the semi-minor axis.

In this case, we know that the distance between the foci is equal to 2a, which means a = 34/2 = 17. The foci of the ellipse are given as (7, 17) and (7, -13). The foci lie on the major axis of the ellipse, and since their y-coordinates differ by 30 (17 - (-13) = 30), the length of the major axis is equal to 2b, which means b = 30/2 = 15.

Now we have the values of a and b, so we can substitute them into the standard form equation:

[tex](x^2/17^2) + (y^2/15^2) = 1[/tex]

Simplifying further, we have:

[tex](x^2/289) + (y^2/225) = 1[/tex]

Therefore, the equation of the ellipse with foci (7, 17) and (7, -13), and a major axis of length 34 is:

[tex](x^2/289) + (y^2/225) = 1.[/tex]

This equation represents an ellipse centered at the point (0, 0) with a semi-major axis of length 17 and a semi-minor axis of length 15.

For more question on ellipse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9702250

#SPJ8

Answer:

The equation of the ellipse with foci (7, 17) and (7, -13), and a major axis of length 34 is

To determine the equation of an ellipse given its foci and the length of its major axis, we need to use the standard form equation for an ellipse. The standard form equation for an ellipse centered at the origin is:

where 'a' represents the semi-major axis and 'b' represents the semi-minor axis.

In this case, we know that the distance between the foci is equal to 2a, which means a = 34/2 = 17. The foci of the ellipse are given as (7, 17) and (7, -13). The foci lie on the major axis of the ellipse, and since their y-coordinates differ by 30 (17 - (-13) = 30), the length of the major axis is equal to 2b, which means b = 30/2 = 15.

Now we have the values of a and b, so we can substitute them into the standard form equation:

Simplifying further, we have:

Therefore, the equation of the ellipse with foci (7, 17) and (7, -13), and a major axis of length 34 is:

This equation represents an ellipse centered at the point (0, 0) with a semi-major axis of length 17 and a semi-minor axis of length 15.

The proof to show that FA = RN should be completed with the following step and reasons;

Step                                                        Reason_______

FR = AN                                                   Given

RA = RA                                   Reflexive property of Equality

FR + RA = AN + RA                 Addition Property of Equality

FR + RA = FA                         Segment Addition Postulate

AN + RA = RN                        Segment Addition Postulate

FA = RN                                 Transitive Property of Equality

In Geometry, the Segment Addition Postulate states that when there are two end points on a line segment (F) and (N), a third point (A) would lie on the line segment (RN), if and only if the magnitude of the distances between the end points satisfy the requirements of these equations;

FR + RA = FA.

AN + RA = RN.

This ultimately implies that, the Segment Addition Postulate is only applicable on a line segment that contains three collinear points.

By applying the Segment Addition Postulate to the given end points, we can logically deduce that line segment FA is equal to line segment RN based on the steps and reasons stated in the two-column proof shown above.

Read more on Segment Addition Postulate here: brainly.com/question/17335225

#SPJ1

We can conclude that there are no ordered triples of positive integers (x, y, z) that satisfy the given equation and the condition x < y.

We are given that the product of three positive integers (x, y, z) is equal to four times their sum:

xyz = 4(x + y + z)

Rearranging the equation, we get:

xyz - 4x - 4y - 4z = 0

We can factor out a common factor of 4 from the terms on the right-hand side:

4(xy - x - y - z) = 0

Now, we have two cases to consider:

Case 1: xy - x - y - z = 0

In this case, we can rewrite the equation as:

x(y - 1) - (y + z) = 0

From this equation, we observe that (y + z) must be divisible by (y - 1). Since x < y, the minimum value of (y - 1) is 1, which means (y + z) should also be 1. However, since we are looking for positive integers, this case does not yield any solutions.

Case 2: xy - x - y - z = 4

In this case, we can rewrite the equation as:

x(y - 1) - (y + z) = 4

Similarly, we observe that (y + z) must be divisible by (y - 1), and now (y - 1) can take on a minimum value of 2. We can analyze different possibilities based on this:

If (y - 1) = 2, then (y + z) = 2. Since we are dealing with positive integers, the only possibility is y = 3 and z = -1, which does not satisfy the condition.

If (y - 1) = 3, then (y + z) = 3. The only possibility is y = 4 and z = -1, which also does not satisfy the condition.

If (y - 1) = 4, then (y + z) = 4. The only possibility is y = 5 and z = -1, which does not satisfy the condition.

For more suhc questions on triples visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16036846

#SPJ8

Work Shown:

cos(angle) = adjacent/hypotenuse

cos(S) = TS/SR

cos(S) = 63/65

cos(S) = 0.969231

cos(S) = 0.97

Each decimal value is approximate. See the diagram below.

Answer:

x<3

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] - 2(5 - 4x) < 6x - 4 \\ - 10 + 8x < 6x - 4 \\ 8x - 6x < - 4 + 10 \\ 2x < 6 \\ x < 3[/tex]

Answer:

{(-7, -8), (-3, 9), (7, 4), (-1, 4)} represents a function.