Question 13 of 20
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce
them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their
duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new
Guards for their future security. Such has been the
patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the
necessity which constrains them to alter their former
Systems of Government.
Why was the above passage included in the Declaration of Independence?
-
A. To identify the improvements made on the Articles of
Confederation
B. To explain that forming an independent nation was a last resort
for the colonists
C. To elaborate on the colonists' preference for democracy
D. To argue that other British subjects should also declare
themselves independent

Answer:The biggest fear that they had over what is sometimes called a “pure democracy” is that the majority has complete power over everyone else.

Explanation:

Pure democracy, in which every citizen has an equal voice in all decisions, may frighten some people for the following reasons.

The majority has the power to impose tyranny in a democracy. This implies that the majority might decide to oppress or discriminate against a minority group. For those who believe in defending individual rights, this is known as the "tyranny of the majority" and is a concern.

Lack of knowledge: In a pure democracy, it is assumed that every citizen is equally knowledgeable and skilled in all matters. In fact, many people lack the time, enthusiasm, or knowledge necessary to fully comprehend complex issues. This might cause the majority to make ill-informed decisions.

Mob rule: When emotions and passions take precedence over logic and reason, pure democracy can occasionally devolve into mob rule. This might cause people to make decisions out of rage or fear rather than after giving them careful thought.

Overall, while promoting equality and participation is one of pure democracy's benefits, it also has some disadvantages and restrictions. Instead, many contemporary democracies rely on representative democracy, in which voters choose representatives to act on their behalf in order to strike a balance between participation and protection of individual rights.

Answer:

A conservative would most likely say they would lower taxes and reduce government including government debt.

A socialist on the other hand would most likely say they would want an economic arrangement that could serve society all in one.

A democratic would support government spending and higher rates and spending less on common defense.

Explanation:

Answer:C is the ananswer.

Explanation:

Answer:

13

Explanation:

Rasputin was known to have had great influence over the Russian royal family, including Czar Nicholas II.

Influence refers to the ability to affect or shape the attitudes, beliefs, and actions of others. It is the power to persuade, motivate, and inspire people to act in a certain way or adopt a particular viewpoint. Influence can be exerted through various means, such as personal charisma, expertise, social status, or access to resources. It can also be wielded through formal authority or informal networks of relationships. Influence is a key aspect of human interaction and can be positive or negative depending on the intent and impact of the influencing behavior. The ability to influence others is a valuable skill in many domains, including leadership, marketing, sales, politics, and social activism.

To learn more about influence, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11259078

#SPJ1

To complete this exercise, you must comprehend the various viewpoints of Israeli and Palestinian children's testimonies in order to pinpoint historical topics and difficulties to discuss in your historical report.

What is Palestinians and Israel issue?

The creation of the state of Israel in 1948 marked the beginning of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This conflict began as intercommunal violence between Arabs and Jews in Mandatory Palestine in 1920 and culminated in full-scale conflicts during the 1947–1948 civil war.

The State of Israel and the Palestinians are still engaged in combat in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The greater Arab-Israeli conflict includes it. It is a conflict between two parties that have competing claims to the same piece of property. Who gets to own what land and how it is handled is at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Despite the fact that Jews and Arab Muslims have claims to the same territory that extend back many thousand years, the current political struggle only started in the early.

Learn more about Palestinians and Israel:

https://brainly.com/question/9279902

#SPJ1

The Great Wall of China was built over several centuries, beginning in the 5th century B.C. during the Zhou dynasty. It was used to protect the country from invasions by nomads from the northern steppes. The wall known today is mainly the result of reconstructions carried out during the Ming Dynasty in the 14th century. The Great Wall of China has a total length of more than 21,000 km and is considered one of the wonders of the ancient world.

Answer:

The answer it's B they worked for freedom for enslaved people in the south

Answer:

the ratication of what?? like it depends on which one you mean

Explanation:

Adams proposed handing Florida over to Spain.

Option A is the right choice.

With the signing of the Florida Purchase Treaty in 1819, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams sealed a diplomatic victory after years of negotiations. Florida was officially transferred to the United States at no cost to the country, other than the assumption of approximately $5 million in claims made by Americans against Spain.

In February 1819, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams and Don Luis de Ons, the Spanish Minister to the United States, signed the Adams-Ons Treaty, which was a diplomatic agreement between the United States and Spain.

To know more about Adams-Onís Treaty visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/2556815

#SPJ9

Answer:

A. It has made the president more popular

It has increased presidential power by helping Presidents build support for their policies.

Explanation:

The modern media has affected American’s opinions on the President by making him more popular through their propaganda.

Therefore correct answer is A. It has made the president more popular.

The World War I and World War II posters featuring Rosie the Riveter and Uncle Sam, respectively, are two illustrations of propaganda. In order to motivate Americans to contribute to the war effort, both instances make use of symbols to convey power and a feeling of urgency.

To convince the audience in favor of or against a specific idea, modern propaganda still employs time-honored strategies like name-calling and band wagoning.

To know more about Propaganda visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29959113

#SPJ1

Kennedy and his advisors planned to dismantle the American missile systems in Turkey, but afterwards, to sidestep the NATO member Turkey's protests, in order to alleviate the increasing tension.

Kennedy was determined to make trades outdated American nuclear missiles stationed in Turkey during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis as a way to get Soviet nuclear weapons out of Cuba and avert a serious military conflict with Moscow, according to a full text of cabinet room conversations secretly recorded at the time.

In another pact, which was kept a secret for more than 25 years, the US also consented to the removal of its nuclear weapons from Turkey. After removing its missiles from Cuba, the Soviet Union continued to advance its military capabilities; the arms race persisted for a considerable amount of time after the missile crisis was resolved.

Learn more about 1962 Cuban missile crisis: https://brainly.com/question/3197645

#SPJ1

Answer: B 2

Explanation:

The North Carolina Fund by Governor Terry Standford does work that is still carried on today, which is why he was so influential.

Option B is correct.

James Terry Sanford was a North Carolina-born American politician and attorney. Sanford, a supporter of the Democratic Party, ran for president twice in the 1970s, served as North Carolina's 65th governor from 1961 to 1965, and was a U.S. senator from 1986 to 1993. As governor of North Carolina, he implemented various reforms and new initiatives in the state's schools and higher education institutions. He was a strong supporter of public education. Sanford led Duke University as its president from 1970 to 1985.

Sanford entered the University of North Carolina School of Law after the war, received his law degree, and started his legal profession in the late 1940s. He rapidly got interested in politics after this. Before deciding to run for governor in 1960, he ran W. Kerr Scott's 1954 U.S. Senate campaign while serving one term in the North Carolina Senate. He beat segregationist I. Beverly Lake, Sr. in the Democratic primary and went on to win the general election for governor by emphasising increasing access to education and employment opportunities. He also started the North Carolina Fund to fight poverty and pushed for the construction of a significant environmental research facility at the Research Triangle Park.

The North Carolina Fund by Governor Terry Standford does work that is still carried on today, which is why he was so influential.

To know more about Governor Terry Stanford's NC Fund, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30618764

#SPJ1

Answer:

Nixon's policy of détente had significant political, social, and economic effects both domestically and internationally. Détente was a policy of reducing tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and it had several effects:Political Effects:

Détente helped to ease tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, leading to a series of arms control agreements such as the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT). It also helped to reduce the risk of nuclear war, which was a major concern during the Cold War.Social Effects:

Détente helped to improve the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which led to increased cultural and educational exchanges between the two countries. This helped to improve the understanding and awareness of each other's cultures, leading to greater social and cultural exchange.Economic Effects:

Détente opened up opportunities for economic cooperation between the United States and the Soviet Union. It led to the establishment of trade agreements, which allowed for increased trade between the two countries. This resulted in economic benefits for both countries and helped to stimulate economic growth.

Domestically, Nixon's policy of détente was not without controversy. Some conservatives opposed it, arguing that it was a sign of weakness and appeasement towards the Soviet Union. Others argued that détente was necessary to avoid a catastrophic war with the Soviet Union

.In conclusion, Nixon's policy of détente had significant political, social, and economic effects. While it helped to reduce tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, it was not without controversy domestically, and it remains a subject of debate and analysis to this day.

Answer:

Black people and Women

Explanation:

Black people couldn't vote during the Jacksonian era because they were enslaved. Women couldn't vote because the 19th amendment hadn't been passed and they were expected to do the house work while men were out doing important duties such as voting.

Answer:

In the twenties, men were typically the breadwinners and held positions of power in the workplace and government. Women, on the other hand, were expected to focus on domestic duties and were limited in their career opportunities. However, some women began to challenge these gender roles and advocate for greater equality.

Explanation:

I agree that the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a significant factor that led to the outbreak of World War I. However, I believe it was not the sole cause of the war. Instead, it was the trigger that ignited long-standing political tensions, militarism, and alliances among the European powers.

The assassination of Franz Ferdinand on June 28, 1914, in Sarajevo, Bosnia, was carried out by a Serbian nationalist, Gavrilo Princip, who sought to end Austro-Hungarian rule in Bosnia. The Austro-Hungarian Empire responded with a list of demands to Serbia, which they refused to comply with, leading to Austria-Hungary declaring war on Serbia on July 28, 1914. This action triggered a chain of alliances among the European powers, leading to the escalation of the conflict into a full-scale war.

While the assassination was the immediate trigger, underlying factors like imperialism, nationalism, militarism, and complex alliances were the root causes of World War I. Imperialism and nationalism led to competition among European powers for colonies and territories, causing tensions to rise. Militarism, the glorification of military power, fueled the arms race, with countries increasing their military might to defend their interests. The system of complex alliances made it difficult to contain any local conflicts, leading to a domino effect where one country's actions could quickly draw others into the war.

Opponents of this viewpoint argue that the assassination was the only cause of the war, and without it, the conflict would not have occurred. However, this argument ignores the long-standing political, economic, and social tensions that existed among the European powers. The assassination was a spark that ignited a powder keg, but the keg was already there, waiting to explode.

In conclusion, while the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a critical event that triggered World War I, it was not the sole cause of the war. A combination of underlying factors such as imperialism, nationalism, militarism, and alliances among the European powers led to the escalation of the conflict. Understanding the root causes of the war is essential in preventing future conflicts and promoting peace.

The issue with the Articles of Confederation is outlined in all option. The official constitution of the Confederacy, the Articles of Confederation, lays out the role of government during that time period.

Regardless of its population, only one vote was given to each state in Congress. The political power of small state residents was proportional to that of large state residents. There was no way for the national government to put its legislative decisions into action or enforce them.

Some of the flaws are as follows:

The Congress could not act without the approval of nine of the thirteen states, so neither the state government nor the national government could tax the people.

The states had to agree to the Articles Amendment unanimously.

The Congress lacked the authority to regulate trade, particularly international trade.

As a result, the choices A, B, C, and D are correct.

To learn more about Confederation visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11649223

#SPJ1

Answer:

Dwight D. Eisenhower was the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe during World War II. He played a crucial role in planning and overseeing the D-Day invasion of Normandy, which was a turning point in the war. His leadership and strategic planning abilities also contributed to the liberation of Paris and the victory in the Battle of the Bulge.

Answer: Civil society is a kind of society which has people who are under law of a given constitution.

Explanation:

In a command economy, all decisions on what products and services should be produced, how they should be produced, and how they should be distributed are made by the government or a central planning authority. In a command economy, the means of production are owned and controlled by the government, and enterprises and private consumers have little to no influence over economic decisions.

A mixed market economy, on the other hand, is a type of economy in which the public and private sectors both participate in economic decision-making. In a mixed market economy, the private sector owns and controls the majority of the means of production and makes most economic choices based on supply and demand. The government regulates the economy and provides public goods and services like infrastructure, healthcare, and education.

The role of the government in determining economic decisions is one significant distinction between a command economy and a mixed market economy. In contrast to a mixed market economy, where the government only controls the economy and provides public goods and services, a command economy gives the government exclusive power over economic decisions. In addition, while in a command economy, people and businesses have little to no authority over economic decisions, the private sector has more influence in a mixed market economy.

Learn more about command economy and mixed market economy:

https://brainly.com/question/30197727

Answer:

war debts, deep economic recession and high unemployment.

Answer: Europe in the 1920s​​ In Britain, poor labor relations even led to a short General Strike in 1926.

The answer is the Aztecs

One document that outlined need for the US to build up its military powers is the National Security Strategy of the United States.

The military is a organized force of armed individuals or groups trained for warfare and defense of a nation, state or organization. Its main objective is to protect the country's sovereignty, maintain peace and order, and defend against any external or internal threat. The military has various branches, such as the army, navy, air force, and marines, each with their specialized roles and responsibilities. Members of the military undergo rigorous training and discipline to prepare them for combat and other demanding situations. They are also expected to uphold the highest ethical and moral standards in carrying out their duties. The military has played a significant role in shaping the course of history and continues to be an essential part of many nations' security and defense strategies.

To learn more about military, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8324732

#SPJ1

Answer:

damian

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise, which was an effort to keep the nation aligned and cohesive, demonstrated the nationalism of Americans. John Quincy's journal entry reveals that this pledge aimed to satisfy official demands without jeopardizing the constitution.

How did the Missouri Compromise affect Americans?

In order to maintain the country's balance between slave and free states, this law simultaneously accepted Maine as a non-slave state and Missouri as a slave state. In the remaining Louisiana Territory, above the 36° 30' latitude line, slavery was likewise prohibited.

The majority of Americans were content with the Missouri Compromise throughout the thirty-four years that it was in effect. They considered it to be as sacrosanct as the Constitution itself and a significant north-south compromise.

The Missouri Compromise prevented a national crisis, but it did little to address the underlying issues, which would reappear with a fury in the years preceding the Civil War.

Learn more about Missouri Compromise:

https://brainly.com/question/18367808

#SPJ1

Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, those who were institutionalised for schizophrenia often got subpar care and support, insufficient medicine, and little to no counselling.

Because of the lack of knowledge about mental health throughout the first half of the twentieth century, schizophrenia was frequently misunderstood and ostracised. Schizophrenia patients were frequently kept in brutal, overcrowded circumstances with insufficient access to appropriate care and medicines. Those with schizophrenia who were institutionalised throughout the early part of the 20th century frequently received poor treatment, little to no support, and insufficient medication. Nonetheless, they could have gotten some fundamental aid, such food, shelter, and help with their cleanliness. Improvements in the treatment of people with schizophrenia did not occur until the latter part of the 20th century as a result of advancements in mental health research and practise.

learn more about twentieth century here:

https://brainly.com/question/3513109

#SPJ4

What did individuals who were institutionalized for schizophrenia during the first half of the twentieth century probably receive, except for what?