PLS HELP! 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST!

Answer:Emperors attempted to solve these problems through internal reforms.

Explanation: For example, the emperor Diocletian split control of the Roman Empire into two halves, a western and an eastern portion. Diocletian believed the territories throughout the empire would be easier to control and support if they were overseen by two administrations.

Answer:

They couldn't gain full political control

Explanation:

with all of the competing royalty making up the empire they would have to make complicated alliances to stay in control

Answer:W.E.B. Du Bois was the first African American to receive a Ph.D. from Harvard University (1895).

The first case study of an African American community was conducted by W.E.B. Du Bois, published as The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study (1899).

W.E.B. Du Bois co-founded the NAACP in 1909.

Explanation:

np

William Edward Burghardt Du Bois was born in Great Barrington, Massachusetts on February 23, 1868, three years after the end of the American Civil War and the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment. He died on the eve of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, on August 27, 1963 in Accra, Ghana. Who was W. E. B.

PEEL for agreeing that Elizabeth I was a great Queen:

Point: Elizabeth I was a great Queen because she provided stability and prosperity to England during her reign.

Evidence: Elizabeth I's reign saw a flourishing of the arts and literature, as well as an expansion of trade and commerce. She also successfully navigated religious tensions and prevented foreign invasion, such as the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588.

Explanation: Elizabeth I's policies and leadership provided stability and growth to England, which led to an increase in wealth and prestige both domestically and internationally. Her strong leadership and diplomatic skills allowed her to maintain peace and prevent conflicts with other countries.

Link: Therefore, it can be argued that Elizabeth I was a great Queen due to her successful reign and contributions to England's prosperity and stability.

PEEL for disagreeing that Elizabeth I was a great Queen:

Point: Elizabeth I was not a great Queen because of her treatment of Catholics and her failure to produce an heir.

Evidence: Elizabeth I implemented harsh measures against Catholics, such as the execution of Mary Queen of Scots, which led to religious persecution and division. Additionally, her refusal to marry and produce an heir caused a succession crisis that led to instability and uncertainty after her death.

Explanation: Elizabeth I's policies towards Catholics and her lack of an heir ultimately had negative consequences for England. Her persecution of Catholics led to resentment and division, and her failure to produce an heir created instability and uncertainty about the future of the monarchy.

Link: Therefore, it can be argued that Elizabeth I was not a great Queen due to her policies and decisions that had negative consequences for England's stability and unity.

I don't have personal opinions. However, I can provide you with two contrasting opinions on whether Elizabeth I was a great Queen.

Opinion 1: Elizabeth I was a great Queen.

- Point: Elizabeth I was a remarkable monarch who achieved political stability and cultural prosperity during her reign.

- Evidence: Under Elizabeth's rule, England experienced a period of relative peace known as the Elizabethan Era. This era saw significant advancements in literature, art, and exploration, with renowned figures like William Shakespeare flourishing under her patronage.

- Explanation: Elizabeth's astute political decisions, such as the defeat of the Spanish Armada and the establishment of the Church of England, contributed to England's rise as a global power. Her leadership and charisma inspired loyalty and admiration from her subjects.

- Link: Overall, Elizabeth I's reign is often celebrated as a golden age for England, marked by stability, artistic achievements, and national pride.

Opinion 2: Elizabeth I was not a great Queen.

- Point: Despite her achievements, Elizabeth I's reign also had its shortcomings and controversies.

- Evidence: Elizabeth's religious policies, particularly her persecution of Catholics, led to division and unrest within her kingdom. Additionally, her refusal to name a successor created uncertainty and ultimately resulted in the turmoil of the Stuart succession.

- Explanation: Elizabeth's emphasis on maintaining her own power and avoiding foreign entanglements limited England's influence abroad and hindered the country's economic growth. Furthermore, her marriage refusal and subsequent lack of an heir created a power vacuum that ultimately led to political instability.

- Link: While Elizabeth I's reign had significant accomplishments, it is important to consider the challenges and controversies that occurred during her time as Queen.

It is important to note that the assessment of whether Elizabeth I was a great Queen can vary depending on the criteria and perspective used.

What made the Byzantine Empire rich and successful for so long, and why did it finally crumble? Constantinople sat in the middle of a trade route,sea and land. Its wealth came from trade and its strong military. Constantinople remained secure and prosperous while cities in western Roman empire crumbles. Thats your answer.

To constantinople sat in the middle of a trade route, sea and land. Its wealth came from trade and its strong military. Constantinople remained secure and prosperous while cities in Western Roman empire crumbles.

Answer:The cotton gin did, in fact, make seed removal less laborious, but it had little effect on the need for slave labor to cultivate and harvest cotton. In actuality, the reverse happened. Slave owners found that cultivating cotton was so profitable that it significantly increased their need for both land and slave labor.please mark me brainliest<3

Eli Whitney's cotton gin impacted not only the south, but also the north by increasing the need for slave labor and having northerners become angered that the awful system of slavery was becoming more mainstream in the union.

Answer: The Renaissance was a period of great intellectual and cultural revival in Europe that spanned from the 14th to the 17th century. Many ideas that emerged during this time contributed to the Reformation of the Catholic Church, which was a religious movement in the 16th century that sought to reform some of the practices and doctrines of the Catholic Church.

One of the key ideas of the Renaissance that influenced the Reformation was humanism, which emphasized the importance of the individual and the study of classical literature, philosophy, and art. This led to a renewed interest in studying the Bible and other religious texts, and many scholars began to question some of the teachings and practices of the Catholic Church.

Another important idea of the Renaissance that contributed to the Reformation was the concept of individualism, which emphasized the importance of personal freedom and choice. This led many people to question the authority of the Catholic Church, which had long held a monopoly on religious authority in Europe.

One example of how these ideas influenced the complaints by people such as Martin Luther was the sale of indulgences. Indulgences were certificates sold by the Catholic Church that supposedly granted forgiveness of sins, and they were often marketed as a way to reduce the time a person would spend in purgatory after death. Luther, who was a German priest and theologian, became increasingly critical of this practice and other abuses of power by the Catholic Church.

Luther's criticisms were rooted in the Renaissance ideas of individualism and humanism. He argued that salvation could not be bought or sold, and that it was the responsibility of each individual to seek forgiveness and salvation through personal faith and devotion. He also believed that the Bible should be accessible to everyone and translated into the vernacular language of each country, rather than being reserved for the clergy and scholars who could read Latin.

Overall, the Renaissance ideas of individualism and humanism contributed to the Reformation of the Catholic Church by challenging the traditional authority and practices of the Church and emphasizing the importance of personal faith and individual freedom.

Explanation:

The Renaissance was a period of intellectual and artistic revival in Europe that occurred between the 14th and 17th centuries. Many of the ideas and values that emerged during the Renaissance had a significant impact on the Reformation of the Catholic Church. Some of the key ideas that contributed to the Reformation include:

Humanism: Humanism emphasized the value of human reason, individualism, and critical thinking. This led to a questioning of traditional authority and a greater emphasis on personal interpretation of religious texts. Martin Luther, for example, was heavily influenced by humanist ideas and believed that individuals should be free to interpret the Bible for themselves.
Individualism: The Renaissance placed a greater emphasis on the importance of the individual, leading to a greater focus on individual rights and freedoms. This influenced the Protestant belief in the priesthood of all believers, which held that every individual has direct access to God without the need for intermediaries such as priests or the Church hierarchy.
Printing Press: The invention of the printing press during the Renaissance allowed for the widespread dissemination of information and ideas, making it easier for Protestant ideas to spread and gain support. Martin Luther used the printing press to distribute his 95 Theses, which were critical of the Church's sale of indulgences.
Secularism: The Renaissance saw a shift away from a purely religious worldview towards a more secular one, with a greater emphasis on science, reason, and the natural world. This undermined the Church's monopoly on knowledge and contributed to the questioning of traditional religious beliefs and practices.
These Renaissance ideas influenced the complaints by people such as Martin Luther by challenging the authority of the Catholic Church and its teachings. Luther's critique of the Church's sale of indulgences, for example, was based on his belief that individuals could not simply buy their way out of sin and that forgiveness could only come from God. Luther also believed that the Church had become corrupt and that its hierarchy had lost sight of the true teachings of the Bible.

Overall, the Renaissance's emphasis on reason, individualism, and critical thinking laid the groundwork for the Protestant Reformation and contributed to the questioning of traditional authority that led to the splintering of the Catholic Church into various Protestant denominations.

answer:

B

Explanation:

Just read, it’s really simple it happened to me when I was on 6th grade but all you have to do is read

The Acadians posed three types of threats to British Security which were Military Threats, Economic Threats, and Cultural Threats.

Military Threat

The British believed that the Acadians posed a military threat due to their close proximity to the French settlements in Nova Scotia, as well as their unwillingness to swear loyalty to the British Crown.

This fear was exacerbated by the ongoing war between Britain and France, which had been ongoing for nearly a century. As a result, the British felt that the Acadians could potentially provide military aid to their French allies, and therefore posed a threat to British security.

Economic Threat

The British also felt that the Acadians posed an economic threat to their colonies in Nova Scotia. The British had been attempting to establish a strong economy in the area, based on fishing and agriculture, and were concerned that the Acadians would undermine this effort.

The British also feared that the Acadians would be able to monopolize the trade in the area, thus depriving the British of the economic benefits that they had hoped to gain by settling the region.

Cultural Threat

Finally, the British were concerned that the Acadian culture would undermine the British culture in Nova Scotia. The British were staunchly Protestant, while the Acadians were Catholic, and the British feared that the Acadians would be resistant to assimilation into British culture.

The British also feared that the Acadians would be able to spread their culture throughout the region, thus undermining the British presence and potentially leading to the creation of a separate French-speaking enclave within the British colonies.

To know more about Acadians:

https://brainly.com/question/31345253

The Acadians posed three types of threats to British Security which were Military Threats, Economic Threats, and Cultural Threats.

Another Supreme Court case which expanded federal Government powers was Gibbons v. Ogden

Gibbons was the other one that’s not muculloch vs Maryland

Part One:

As a citizen, my responsibility is to ensure that every vote is cast fairly and without coercion. In this scenario, I witnessed a van of mentally disabled people being paid to vote for a particular candidate. This is a clear violation of their rights as voters and is an act of voter fraud. I feel uneasy witnessing this, and I believe that it is my responsibility to report this behavior to the authorities. It is important to ensure that every vote is cast freely and without coercion, and that everyone's voice is heard equally. By reporting this, I am upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the integrity of the election is maintained.

Part Two:

The case of voter fraud involves the payment of a van full of mentally disabled people to vote for a specific candidate in the previous election. The defendant is accused of orchestrating the scheme and bribing vulnerable voters to cast their ballots in favor of the candidate they support. The case is brought to trial as a criminal case, as voter fraud is a serious offense that undermines the democratic process.

On one side, the prosecution argues that the defendant committed voter fraud by coercing mentally disabled people to vote for a specific candidate. They argue that this behavior undermines the integrity of the election and is a direct violation of the voting rights of those who were coerced. The prosecution presents evidence of witnesses who saw the defendant paying voters to cast their ballots.

On the other hand, the defense argues that the defendant did not coerce the voters and that they cast their ballots freely. They argue that there is no evidence to suggest that the defendant bribed voters, and that the accusations are based on hearsay. The defense presents witnesses who testify that the voters cast their ballots of their own free will.

Part Three:

As a member of the jury, I find myself in a room with my fellow jurors trying to determine the verdict of the case. The defendant is a middle-aged man who appears nervous and anxious throughout the proceedings. His lawyers argue that there is no concrete evidence to prove that the defendant committed voter fraud and that the accusations are based on hearsay.

The prosecution presents witnesses who saw the defendant paying voters to cast their ballots. The defense argues that the witnesses' testimony is unreliable, as they cannot provide concrete evidence to support their claims. The defense presents witnesses who testify that the voters cast their ballots of their own free will.

The key evidence in this case is the testimony of the witnesses who saw the defendant paying voters to cast their ballots. This evidence turns the tide in favor of the prosecution, as it provides concrete proof that the defendant committed voter fraud. The prosecution's evidence is a steady stream of testimony from witnesses who saw the defendant in action, while the defense's evidence is mainly hearsay.

During the adjournment, the jury deliberates on the evidence presented in the trial. There are differing viewpoints among the jurors, with some believing that the evidence presented by the prosecution is convincing, while others are skeptical of the witnesses' testimony. However, as the deliberation continues, the majority of the jurors come to a unanimous decision that the defendant is guilty of committing voter fraud.

In conclusion, the case of voter fraud is a serious offense that undermines the democratic process. As a member of the jury, it is important to evaluate the evidence presented in the trial and make a decision based on the facts of the case. While emotions and perceptions may influence our decision, it is important to remain impartial and make a decision based solely on the evidence presented in court. By upholding the integrity of the democratic process, we ensure that every vote is counted fairly and without coercion.

Answer:Part One: Because there are generally police officers present during local elections, I would most likely report the matter to one of the local police officers. I'd then proceed to tell the cops who was who and who was paid. If I had seen the license plate, I would have snapped a picture of it and shown it to the police officers. Part Two: In one incidence of voter fraud, a van full of mentally challenged persons was paid to vote for a certain candidate in the previous election. The defendant is accused of masterminding the operation and paying susceptible people to vote for the candidate they favour. Voter fraud is a severe act that threatens the democratic process, hence the case is being tried as a criminal case. On the one hand, the prosecution claims that the defendant engaged in voting fraud by coercing mentally ill persons to vote for a certain candidate. They claim that this activity jeopardizes the election's integrity and is a blatant violation of the voting rights of individuals who were pressured. The prosecution offers testimony from witnesses who observed the defendant bribe voters to vote. The defense, on the other hand, claims that the defendant did not compel the voters and that they voted freely. They claim there is no proof that the defendant bribed votes and that the claims are based only on hearsay. The defense calls witnesses who attest that the people voted of their own free choice.Part Three: I am seated in a chamber with the other members of the jury while we deliberate the case's verdict. The defendant, a man who seems to be in his early 20s, is tense, nervous, and perspiring throughout the proceedings. His attorneys contend that the claims are based only on rumor and that there is no hard proof to support the defendant's involvement in voter fraud.The defense calls witnesses who observed the defendant buying votes from voters. The defense contends that because the witnesses are unable to offer conclusive proof to back up their statements, their testimony cannot be trusted. The defense calls witnesses who attest that the voters exercised their right to vote voluntarily.The testimony of the witnesses who witnessed the defendant bribe voters to cast their ballots is the main piece of evidence in this case. This evidence shifts the balance in the prosecution's favor since it offers undeniable proof that the defendant engaged in voting fraud. The defense's evidence consists mostly of hearsay, but the prosecution's evidence is a continual stream of testimony from witnesses who witnessed the defendant in action. The jury deliberates on the evidence heard throughout the trial during the break. The jury's opinions vary, with some considering the prosecution's evidence to be persuasive while others finding the testimony of the witnesses to be unreliable. However, as the jury proceeds to deliberate, the majority of them reach a unanimity that the defendant has engaged in voter fraud.Summing it all up, Voter fraud is a serious act that undercuts the democratic process, to sum up. As a jury member, it is crucial to assess the testimony given during the trial and reach a conclusion based on the circumstances of the case. Even if our judgment may be influenced by our feelings and impressions, it's crucial to maintain objectivity and base your choice exclusively on the information that was given in court. Maintaining the democratic process' integrity allows us to make sure that every vote is cast fairly and without interference.