Mia Chloe and tony entered their

Answer:

15x-8x-5x=48

3x=48

or X=16

4=4y+2y

or 4= 6y

or 4/6=y

or y=2/3

4-5x= 3x

or 4=5x+3x

or 4=8x

or 4/8=X

or X=2

2x=2x-5+8

or,2x= 2x-13

or 2x+2x=13

or 4x=13

or X= 13/4

or X =3.25

4y=4y+9-9

or 4y=4y+0

or 4y-4y=0

or 0=0

Answer:

yup your answer is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

xhfdgkdhkchkdgjdgkfkyfgkfhg

Answer:

it's correct and i'm 13

if u add the whole numbers first which is 3+6 which equals 9 and then u add 1/7 + 4/7 which will give you 5/7. So the whole answer will be what you said 9 5/7

Answer:

alternate interior angle

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

use the thingy with the holes I guess

Answer: 64 centimeters squared.

Step-by-step explanation: This shape is a parallelogram. And the area of a parallelogram is just the base multiplied by the height. Here, the base is 10 cm and the height is 7 cm. So you might think the the area is just 70 centimeters squared. But here's the catch. There is a rectangular region in this parallelogram that is not shaded. But you can still easily solve this problem. All you need to do is find the area of that rectangular region and you already know the length and the width of this region. And, remember, the area of a rectangle is just the length and the width multiplied. So here, the area of that rectangular region is just 2 cm multiplied by 3 cm. Which will give you 6 centimeters squared. Now, all that's left to do is subtract the area of that rectangular region, 6 centimeters squared, from the total area of the parallelogram, 70 centimeters squared. And that should give you 64 centimeters squared as your final answer. I really hope this makes sense and is helpful.

Answer:

The answer is below

Step-by-step explanation:

a)

Amount Stefan sold the bicycle and helmet to Jin = cost of bicycle + cost of helmet = $115 + $16 = $131

This amount that Jin bought both bicycle and helmet is 110% of what Stefan spent originally to buy the bike and helmet.

Let x = what Stefan spent originally to buy the bike and helmet = original price. Hence:

110% of x = $131

(110 / 100) * x = 131

1.1x = 131

x = $119.09

b)

Hence the profit made from selling the bike = $131 - $119.09 = $11.91

Answer:

57 × 10 will give you 5700, as well as 285 × 20.

Answer:

I think 21

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

24 cups

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the amount of peaches in a fruit salad, you would multiply the cups of salad by 2/5 because 2 cups of peaches are dedicated to the fruit salad for every 3 cups of cherries, having the peaches make up 2 out of every 5 cups or 2/5. So the equation would be 60=0.4x, with x being the cups of peaches.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The number we want is 2/3 of 60. We need to multiply 2/3 by 60 which is 40. 40/60 is the new ratio of peaches to cherries, which is still 2/3. This way, we know we did it correctly.

Answer:

b is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B: 5 games at bowling alley C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A+B+C=180

2x+x+90=180    ( the 90 comes from the right angle in the given triangle)

3x=90

x=30°

:) these are all kinda the same strategy.. notice?

Answer:

C (x-8)(x-5)

Step-by-step explanation:

(5-8) = -3

(5-5) = 0

-3 x 0 = 0

Given:

X=number of hours

Y=number of tents made

Table of value.

To find:

The slope and its interpretation.

Solution:

Consider any two points from the table, i.e., (0,6) and (1,7).

The slope is

[tex]m=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

[tex]m=\dfrac{7-6}{1-0}[/tex]

[tex]m=\dfrac{1}{1}[/tex]

[tex]m=1[/tex]

Therefore, the slope is 1 and it represent that the number of tents made are increasing by 1 units in each hour.

In Step 1, she used the Distributive Property incorrectly. She should have distributed the 3 to the 2. The equation should have been

3x + 6 + 1 = 24.

Answer:

The answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

If you look at the bottom it is near -6 so if you reflect it it would be at 6 but it was 2 units down at 4

Answer:

its the last one

Step-by-step explanation:

the shape is across the x axis so you don't do 2 or 3 then you do it and it is 2 units different not 1 so it is the last one

The number of hours taken should be 8.5 hours

And, the distance should be 187 km.

d = 18t + 34

d = 22t

Put the d value in the above equation

22t = 18t + 34

22t - 18t = 34

4t = 34

t = 8.5 hours

Now the distance is

= 22(8.5)

= 187 km

Find out more information about the  Distance here :brainly.com/question/21470320?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

d = [tex]\sqrt{(x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2-y_1)^2}[/tex]

d  = distance

(x1, y1) = coordinates of the first point

(x2, y2) = coordinates of the second point

Answer:

[tex]m=\frac{7}{3}[/tex]

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Algebra I

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

Point (0, 7)

Point (-3, 0)

Step 2: Find slope m

Simply plug in the 2 coordinates into the slope formula to find slope m

Answer:

14 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the shorter piece have length x.

Since the ratio is 2:3 and the longer piece is 21 feet long, we can write that as 2:3 = x:21.

Writing it as fractions, we get 2/3 = x/21 —(multiply by 21)—> x = 21*2/3 = 7*2 = 14 feet.

Thus, the shorter piece is 14 feet.

I hope this helps! :)

the shorter piece is 14ft long

Step-by-step explanation:

let the shorter piece be x

longer piece will be x:21

ratio of two pieces= 2:3

2:3=x:21

2/3=X/21

then cross multiply

21×2=3x

42/3=3x/3

X=14

2:3=14:21

hope it helps

The answer is -3/-1/2

Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box.

Answer:

Distributive property of equality

Step-by-step explanation:

The first thing to do in an equation is to distribute.

Answer:

Distributive property of equality

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(26 x $1,334) + ( 19 x $ 749) = $48,915

Step-by-step explanation:

All together she spent $45,915. She spent $34, 684 on treadmills and $14,231 on Stationary bikes.

hope this helps. If it does please mark me the brianliest!

Peace and Love

Answer:

is there more?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

40-26.50=m

Step-by-step explanation:

Cause im doing it right now and i got it right

Hot dog juice is the best. There will not be any hot dog juice left over because I drank it all. Hot dog, Hot dog, Hot diggity dog!

maybe 61km from northeast

Answer/Step-by-step explanation:

Given that ∆GHJ is congruent to ∆XYZ, this:

<G = <X,

<H = <Y = 38°

<J = <Z,

GH = XY = 27 ft

HJ = YZ = 27 ft (two sides of an isosceles ∆ are the same)

GJ = XZ = 18 ft

a. GJ = 18 ft

b. XY = 27 ft

c. ZY = 27 ft

d. m<H = m<Y (corresponding angles)

m<H = 38° (substitution)

e. m<Z = (180 - 38)/2 (base triangles of an isosceles ∆ are equal)

m<Z = 142/2

m<Z = 71°

f. m<J = m<Z (corresponding angles)

m<J = 71° (substitution)

Answer:

After 14 years, the area will be 2342.4 km squared.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the area is decreasing, we can use the decaying exponential function

[tex]y = A(1 - r)^{t}[/tex]

where

Given

Initial Area A = 4000 km squared

Rate r = 3.75% = 3.75/100 = 0.0375

Time period t = 14

To Determine

The Area after 14 years = y = ?

Plug in the values in the formula

[tex]y = A(1 - r)^{t}[/tex]

[tex]y\:=4000\left(1\:-\:0.0375\right)^{14}[/tex]

[tex]y=4000\cdot \:0.9625^{14}[/tex]

[tex]y=2342.4[/tex] km squared

Therefore, after 14 years, the area will be 2342.4 km squared.

Complete Question:

The correlation between years of education and salary in a sample of 20 people from a certain company is .4. Is this correlation statistically significant at the .05 level?

Answer:

We accept [tex]H_o[/tex] hence no significant  evidence

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

sample correlation n= 20

population correlation  = 4

level of significance [tex]\alpha =0.05[/tex]

Generally we are task to understand existing difference between  sample correlation and population correlation

Generally null hypothesis  is given by [tex]H_o : p=0[/tex]

alternative hypothesis [tex]H1_1 : p\neq 0[/tex]

generaly the mathematical representation of test statics

        [tex]t= r\sqrt{\frac{n-2}{1-r^2} }[/tex]

        [tex]t= 0.04\sqrt{\frac{20-2}{1-0.4^2} }[/tex]

        [tex]t= 1.85[/tex]

Generally for table the p value is given by [tex]p= 0.08056[/tex]

p value > the null hypothesis

Therefore

We accept [tex]H_o[/tex] hence no significant  evidence