Answer:
✓ Someone who took over if Rome was in
imminent danger - A. Dictator of Rome
✓ Elite families - B. Patricians
✓ Legislators - C. Senate of Rome
✓ Common people - D. Plebeians
✓ Chief executives - E. Consuls
Explanation:
The Roman Republic had a complex system of government, with different roles and institutions. Here are the explanations for each of the terms:
A. Dictator of Rome: This was a temporary position that was only filled in times of extreme crisis. The dictator was granted absolute power to deal with the emergency, and their authority superseded all other offices and officials.
B. Patricians: These were the elite families of ancient Rome, who held most of the political power and wealth. They were the only ones allowed to hold certain public offices and had exclusive access to certain religious ceremonies.
C. Senate of Rome: This was a council of elders who advised the magistrates and made important decisions on matters of state. They were selected from the patrician class, but over time, some plebeians were also admitted.
D. Plebeians: These were the common people of Rome, who made up the majority of the population. They had limited political power and were excluded from many public offices, but they could still vote and participate in certain assemblies.
E. Consuls: These were the chief executives of the Roman Republic. There were two consuls, who served for one year and had equal power. They were responsible for leading the army, administering justice, and conducting foreign affairs.
Who conferred with Rasputin to help lighten the Czar's load over political appointments
Rasputin was known to have had great influence over the Russian royal family, including Czar Nicholas II.
What is influence?Influence refers to the ability to affect or shape the attitudes, beliefs, and actions of others. It is the power to persuade, motivate, and inspire people to act in a certain way or adopt a particular viewpoint. Influence can be exerted through various means, such as personal charisma, expertise, social status, or access to resources. It can also be wielded through formal authority or informal networks of relationships. Influence is a key aspect of human interaction and can be positive or negative depending on the intent and impact of the influencing behavior. The ability to influence others is a valuable skill in many domains, including leadership, marketing, sales, politics, and social activism.
To learn more about influence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11259078
#SPJ1
definition of civil soceity
Answer: Civil society is a kind of society which has people who are under law of a given constitution.
Explanation:
explain how the Mayflower Compact the Virginia House of Burgesses and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut were important steps in the growth of representative government in the British colonies…. Has to be at least 4 sentences….
HELP !!!!
Answer:
The Mayflower Compact, signed by the Pilgrims in 1620, was important in the growth of representative government in the British colonies because it was a voluntary agreement among individuals to form a government based on the consent of the governed. It established a framework for self-government and provided a model for future colonial governments.
The Virginia House of Burgesses, established in 1619, was the first representative assembly in the American colonies. It provided a forum for colonists to make laws and manage their own affairs, which was an important step towards self-government.
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, adopted in 1639, were important in the growth of representative government in the British colonies because they established a formal written constitution that outlined the powers of government and the rights of the people. This document served as a model for other colonial governments and was an important step in the development of democratic government in America.
Together, these three documents established the precedent for representative government in the British colonies, which would later serve as a model for the United States government. They also paved the way for the development of individual rights and freedoms, which would be enshrined in the United States Constitution.
Explanation:
who signed the ratification
Answer:
the ratication of what?? like it depends on which one you mean
Explanation:
How did the Second Great Awakening impact the roles of African Americans?
A. They had greater participation in the church.
B. They worked for freedom for enslaved people in the South.
C. They had less responsibilities in their jobs.
D. They had greater responsibilities in the home.
Answer:
The answer it's B they worked for freedom for enslaved people in the south
In the 1920's & early 1930's, Europe was dealing with
Answer:
war debts, deep economic recession and high unemployment.
Answer: Europe in the 1920s In Britain, poor labor relations even led to a short General Strike in 1926.
The table above gives the free-throw statistics for four of the top NBA players in 2020-21. Which player made the greatest percentage of free throws attempted?
Answer:
damian
Explanation:
Is this correct? If not what is it and why?
The issue with the Articles of Confederation is outlined in all option. The official constitution of the Confederacy, the Articles of Confederation, lays out the role of government during that time period.
What three issues did the Articles of Confederation have?Regardless of its population, only one vote was given to each state in Congress. The political power of small state residents was proportional to that of large state residents. There was no way for the national government to put its legislative decisions into action or enforce them.
Some of the flaws are as follows:
The Congress could not act without the approval of nine of the thirteen states, so neither the state government nor the national government could tax the people.
The states had to agree to the Articles Amendment unanimously.
The Congress lacked the authority to regulate trade, particularly international trade.
As a result, the choices A, B, C, and D are correct.
To learn more about Confederation visit :
https://brainly.com/question/11649223
#SPJ1
What role did Dwight D. Eisenhower play with respect to World War II? What were their successes during the war?
Answer:
Dwight D. Eisenhower was the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe during World War II. He played a crucial role in planning and overseeing the D-Day invasion of Normandy, which was a turning point in the war. His leadership and strategic planning abilities also contributed to the liberation of Paris and the victory in the Battle of the Bulge.
The United States NATO allies did not know about the agreement to remove missiles in Turkey. Why do you think President Kennedy wanted to keep that a secret from them?
Kennedy and his advisors planned to dismantle the American missile systems in Turkey, but afterwards, to sidestep the NATO member Turkey's protests, in order to alleviate the increasing tension.
The secret American removal of missiles from Turkey and Italy raises a question: why?Kennedy was determined to make trades outdated American nuclear missiles stationed in Turkey during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis as a way to get Soviet nuclear weapons out of Cuba and avert a serious military conflict with Moscow, according to a full text of cabinet room conversations secretly recorded at the time.
Only tacitly, Kennedy approved of the removal of US missiles from Turkey.In another pact, which was kept a secret for more than 25 years, the US also consented to the removal of its nuclear weapons from Turkey. After removing its missiles from Cuba, the Soviet Union continued to advance its military capabilities; the arms race persisted for a considerable amount of time after the missile crisis was resolved.
Learn more about 1962 Cuban missile crisis: https://brainly.com/question/3197645
#SPJ1
Question 13 of 20
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce
them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their
duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new
Guards for their future security. Such has been the
patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the
necessity which constrains them to alter their former
Systems of Government.
Why was the above passage included in the Declaration of Independence?
-
A. To identify the improvements made on the Articles of
Confederation
B. To explain that forming an independent nation was a last resort
for the colonists
C. To elaborate on the colonists' preference for democracy
D. To argue that other British subjects should also declare
themselves independent
The king's ongoing violations of the colonists' rights are described as "a protracted train of abuses and usurpations" in this statement. The extract asserts that the populace has the authority to alter the existing government and establish a new one.
What is Despotism and future security?
To lodge troops in the colonies, stop commerce with foreign countries, impose taxes without the approval of colonial governments, take away the right to a jury trial, and have colonists stand trial in England are just a few of the laws that have been passed.
The Declaration uses the term in an extremely intriguing way since, most of the time, it is those in positions of authority who are usurped, by opponents who, for example, seek to sit on their throne. In the Declaration, the King is shown as usurping authority and rights that rightfully belong to the people. A preamble, a list of complaints, a formal proclamation of independence, and signatures are all included in the Declaration of Independence's final draft.
Learn more about Despotism:
https://brainly.com/question/12266419
#SPJ1
What commonplace demand from the world's independence movements did the United States repeatedly reject?
a. that independence movements reject communism
b. that decolonized nations have democratically elected governments
c. that colonial resources and industries be returned to decolonized nations
d. that independence movements use military force to overthrow their colonizers
How does a command economy differ from a mixed market economy?
In a command economy, all decisions on what products and services should be produced, how they should be produced, and how they should be distributed are made by the government or a central planning authority. In a command economy, the means of production are owned and controlled by the government, and enterprises and private consumers have little to no influence over economic decisions.
A mixed market economy, on the other hand, is a type of economy in which the public and private sectors both participate in economic decision-making. In a mixed market economy, the private sector owns and controls the majority of the means of production and makes most economic choices based on supply and demand. The government regulates the economy and provides public goods and services like infrastructure, healthcare, and education.
The role of the government in determining economic decisions is one significant distinction between a command economy and a mixed market economy. In contrast to a mixed market economy, where the government only controls the economy and provides public goods and services, a command economy gives the government exclusive power over economic decisions. In addition, while in a command economy, people and businesses have little to no authority over economic decisions, the private sector has more influence in a mixed market economy.
Learn more about command economy and mixed market economy:
https://brainly.com/question/30197727
Describe the role of both men and women in the twenties.
Answer:
In the twenties, men were typically the breadwinners and held positions of power in the workplace and government. Women, on the other hand, were expected to focus on domestic duties and were limited in their career opportunities. However, some women began to challenge these gender roles and advocate for greater equality.
Explanation:
CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE I WOULD APPCIATE IT.
(Q005) How does the Missouri Compromise reflect the strong sense of nationalism Americans felt for their country in the early 1800s?
What details can we learn from John Quincy Adams's diary entry? Use quotes directly from the primary source.
The Missouri Compromise, which was an effort to keep the nation aligned and cohesive, demonstrated the nationalism of Americans. John Quincy's journal entry reveals that this pledge aimed to satisfy official demands without jeopardizing the constitution.
How did the Missouri Compromise affect Americans?
In order to maintain the country's balance between slave and free states, this law simultaneously accepted Maine as a non-slave state and Missouri as a slave state. In the remaining Louisiana Territory, above the 36° 30' latitude line, slavery was likewise prohibited.
The majority of Americans were content with the Missouri Compromise throughout the thirty-four years that it was in effect. They considered it to be as sacrosanct as the Constitution itself and a significant north-south compromise.
The Missouri Compromise prevented a national crisis, but it did little to address the underlying issues, which would reappear with a fury in the years preceding the Civil War.
Learn more about Missouri Compromise:
https://brainly.com/question/18367808
#SPJ1
The result of the attack on fort Wagner, by the 54th Massachusetts regiment showed the that African-Americans
How has the trend in female Congress membership changed over recent years?
A. Female Congress membership have become the majority
B. Female Congress membership has increased
C. Female Congress membership has decreased
D. Female Congress membership has remained the same
Answer:
B
Explanation:
what were the political, social, and economic effects of nixon's policy of detente
Answer:
Nixon's policy of détente had significant political, social, and economic effects both domestically and internationally. Détente was a policy of reducing tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and it had several effects:Political Effects:
Détente helped to ease tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, leading to a series of arms control agreements such as the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT). It also helped to reduce the risk of nuclear war, which was a major concern during the Cold War.Social Effects:
Détente helped to improve the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which led to increased cultural and educational exchanges between the two countries. This helped to improve the understanding and awareness of each other's cultures, leading to greater social and cultural exchange.Economic Effects:
Détente opened up opportunities for economic cooperation between the United States and the Soviet Union. It led to the establishment of trade agreements, which allowed for increased trade between the two countries. This resulted in economic benefits for both countries and helped to stimulate economic growth.
Domestically, Nixon's policy of détente was not without controversy. Some conservatives opposed it, arguing that it was a sign of weakness and appeasement towards the Soviet Union. Others argued that détente was necessary to avoid a catastrophic war with the Soviet Union
.In conclusion, Nixon's policy of détente had significant political, social, and economic effects. While it helped to reduce tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, it was not without controversy domestically, and it remains a subject of debate and analysis to this day.
How old must be a person to be considered a teenager
Answer:
13
Explanation:
NEED HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 5 STARS I HAVE 30 MINUTES.
Answer:
A conservative would most likely say they would lower taxes and reduce government including government debt.
A socialist on the other hand would most likely say they would want an economic arrangement that could serve society all in one.
A democratic would support government spending and higher rates and spending less on common defense.
Explanation:
Who was excluded from voting during the Jacksonian Era? Select two answers. White farmers women Black people White landowners White laborers
Answer:
Black people and Women
Explanation:
Black people couldn't vote during the Jacksonian era because they were enslaved. Women couldn't vote because the 19th amendment hadn't been passed and they were expected to do the house work while men were out doing important duties such as voting.
Please only answer correct.
A B C D or
1 2 3 4
Answer: B 2
Explanation:
The North Carolina Fund by Governor Terry Standford does work that is still carried on today, which is why he was so influential.
Option B is correct.
What was Governor Terry Standford's NC Fund?James Terry Sanford was a North Carolina-born American politician and attorney. Sanford, a supporter of the Democratic Party, ran for president twice in the 1970s, served as North Carolina's 65th governor from 1961 to 1965, and was a U.S. senator from 1986 to 1993. As governor of North Carolina, he implemented various reforms and new initiatives in the state's schools and higher education institutions. He was a strong supporter of public education. Sanford led Duke University as its president from 1970 to 1985.
Sanford entered the University of North Carolina School of Law after the war, received his law degree, and started his legal profession in the late 1940s. He rapidly got interested in politics after this. Before deciding to run for governor in 1960, he ran W. Kerr Scott's 1954 U.S. Senate campaign while serving one term in the North Carolina Senate. He beat segregationist I. Beverly Lake, Sr. in the Democratic primary and went on to win the general election for governor by emphasising increasing access to education and employment opportunities. He also started the North Carolina Fund to fight poverty and pushed for the construction of a significant environmental research facility at the Research Triangle Park.
The North Carolina Fund by Governor Terry Standford does work that is still carried on today, which is why he was so influential.
To know more about Governor Terry Stanford's NC Fund, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30618764
#SPJ1
Why would they be afraid of pure democracy?
Answer:The biggest fear that they had over what is sometimes called a “pure democracy” is that the majority has complete power over everyone else.
Explanation:
Pure democracy, in which every citizen has an equal voice in all decisions, may frighten some people for the following reasons.
The majority has the power to impose tyranny in a democracy. This implies that the majority might decide to oppress or discriminate against a minority group. For those who believe in defending individual rights, this is known as the "tyranny of the majority" and is a concern.
Lack of knowledge: In a pure democracy, it is assumed that every citizen is equally knowledgeable and skilled in all matters. In fact, many people lack the time, enthusiasm, or knowledge necessary to fully comprehend complex issues. This might cause the majority to make ill-informed decisions.
Mob rule: When emotions and passions take precedence over logic and reason, pure democracy can occasionally devolve into mob rule. This might cause people to make decisions out of rage or fear rather than after giving them careful thought.
Overall, while promoting equality and participation is one of pure democracy's benefits, it also has some disadvantages and restrictions. Instead, many contemporary democracies rely on representative democracy, in which voters choose representatives to act on their behalf in order to strike a balance between participation and protection of individual rights.
individuals who were institutionalized for schizophrenia during the first half of the twentieth century probably received all of the following except:
Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, those who were institutionalised for schizophrenia often got subpar care and support, insufficient medicine, and little to no counselling.
Because of the lack of knowledge about mental health throughout the first half of the twentieth century, schizophrenia was frequently misunderstood and ostracised. Schizophrenia patients were frequently kept in brutal, overcrowded circumstances with insufficient access to appropriate care and medicines. Those with schizophrenia who were institutionalised throughout the early part of the 20th century frequently received poor treatment, little to no support, and insufficient medication. Nonetheless, they could have gotten some fundamental aid, such food, shelter, and help with their cleanliness. Improvements in the treatment of people with schizophrenia did not occur until the latter part of the 20th century as a result of advancements in mental health research and practise.
learn more about twentieth century here:
https://brainly.com/question/3513109
#SPJ4
What did individuals who were institutionalized for schizophrenia during the first half of the twentieth century probably receive, except for what?
How did John Quincy Adams negotiate the Adams-Onís Treaty?
Adams offered to give Spain control of Florida.
Adams convinced Spain it couldn't hold on to Florida.
Adams offered to give Great Britain control of Florida.
Adams convinced Great Britain it couldn't hold on to Florida.
Adams proposed handing Florida over to Spain.
Option A is the right choice.
In the course of settling the Florida dispute, when was John Quincy Adams able to secure the cession of Florida?With the signing of the Florida Purchase Treaty in 1819, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams sealed a diplomatic victory after years of negotiations. Florida was officially transferred to the United States at no cost to the country, other than the assumption of approximately $5 million in claims made by Americans against Spain.
The Adams-Ons Treaty was negotiated for the US by whom?In February 1819, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams and Don Luis de Ons, the Spanish Minister to the United States, signed the Adams-Ons Treaty, which was a diplomatic agreement between the United States and Spain.
To know more about Adams-Onís Treaty visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/2556815
#SPJ9
Write an essay explaining your position regarding the following quote:
"World War I was caused by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand."
Do you agree or disagree?
Your essay should:
-Take a clear and firm position
-Cite Evidence
-Discuss opposing viewpoints
-Follow a logical order
250 WORDS please
I agree that the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a significant factor that led to the outbreak of World War I. However, I believe it was not the sole cause of the war. Instead, it was the trigger that ignited long-standing political tensions, militarism, and alliances among the European powers.
The assassination of Franz Ferdinand on June 28, 1914, in Sarajevo, Bosnia, was carried out by a Serbian nationalist, Gavrilo Princip, who sought to end Austro-Hungarian rule in Bosnia. The Austro-Hungarian Empire responded with a list of demands to Serbia, which they refused to comply with, leading to Austria-Hungary declaring war on Serbia on July 28, 1914. This action triggered a chain of alliances among the European powers, leading to the escalation of the conflict into a full-scale war.
While the assassination was the immediate trigger, underlying factors like imperialism, nationalism, militarism, and complex alliances were the root causes of World War I. Imperialism and nationalism led to competition among European powers for colonies and territories, causing tensions to rise. Militarism, the glorification of military power, fueled the arms race, with countries increasing their military might to defend their interests. The system of complex alliances made it difficult to contain any local conflicts, leading to a domino effect where one country's actions could quickly draw others into the war.
Opponents of this viewpoint argue that the assassination was the only cause of the war, and without it, the conflict would not have occurred. However, this argument ignores the long-standing political, economic, and social tensions that existed among the European powers. The assassination was a spark that ignited a powder keg, but the keg was already there, waiting to explode.
In conclusion, while the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a critical event that triggered World War I, it was not the sole cause of the war. A combination of underlying factors such as imperialism, nationalism, militarism, and alliances among the European powers led to the escalation of the conflict. Understanding the root causes of the war is essential in preventing future conflicts and promoting peace.
How has the modern media affected American’s opinions on the President?
A. It has made the president more popular
B. It has brought Americans closer to the president
C. It has made the president less popular
D. It has distanced Americans from the president
Answer:
A. It has made the president more popular
It has increased presidential power by helping Presidents build support for their policies.
Explanation:
The modern media has affected American’s opinions on the President by making him more popular through their propaganda.
Therefore correct answer is A. It has made the president more popular.
What are propaganda and an example?The World War I and World War II posters featuring Rosie the Riveter and Uncle Sam, respectively, are two illustrations of propaganda. In order to motivate Americans to contribute to the war effort, both instances make use of symbols to convey power and a feeling of urgency.
Does contemporary propaganda entail?To convince the audience in favor of or against a specific idea, modern propaganda still employs time-honored strategies like name-calling and band wagoning.
To know more about Propaganda visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29959113
#SPJ1
NEED HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 5 STARS.
The Indian tribe that built a powerful empire in Mexico
The answer is the Aztecs
Why did the SS begin to evacuate concentration
camps?
A The prisoners were needed at other
concentration camps for labor.
B The SS learned that Sovient spies had infiltrated
the concentration camps.
C The SS did not want the Soviets to uncover more
evidence of their war crimes.
D The camps had become extremely crowded,
requiring prisoners to be transferred.
Answer:C is the ananswer.
Explanation: