Making a shell momentum balance on the fluid ov Hagen-Poiseuille equation for laminar flow of a li T What are the limitations in using the Hagen-Poise
the fluid over cylindrical shell to derivate the

Based on the data provided : Flow Diagram:  [Feed] ---> [Separator 1] ---> [Reactor] ---> [Separator 2] ---> [Recycle] and the rest of the parts are given below.

The complete solution is given below:

The overall mole balance for the first separation column is given by : FA + FN = V + W ...(i)

The mole balance for species A is given by : FAyNA + FNYNA = VyvA + Wx1 ...(ii)

Using (i), we get : FyNA = VyvA - Wx1 ...(iii)

Now, using the fact that the molar fractions in V are in their stoichiometric ratios, we can write : yvA / yvB = 1 / 2 ...(iv)

Solving for yvA, we get : yvA = 2yvB ...(v)

Substituting (v) in (iii), we get : FyNA = 2VyvB - Wx1 ...(vi)

Molar balance for species B is given by : FAyNB + FNYNB = VyVB + Wx2 ...(vii)

Using (iv), we can write : yvA / yvB = 1 / 2 ...(viii)

Solving for yvB, we get : yvB = yvA / 2 ...(ix)

Substituting (ix) in (vii), we get : FAyNB + FNYNB = 2VyvA + Wx2 ...(x)

The total flow rate of the mixed stream M is : F + 20 = 120 kmol/hr

Molar fraction of A in M is : xMA = (FyNA + 20yNA) / (F + 20) ...(xi)

Substituting (v) in (xi), : xMA = (2VyvB - Wx1 + 20yNA) / 120 ...(xii)

Molar fraction of B M is : xMB = (FyNB + 20yNB) / (F + 20) ...(xiii)

Substituting (x) in (xiii), : xMB = (2VyvA + Wx2 + 20yNB) / 120 ...(xiv)

Solving for x, we get the cubic equation : 2x³ - (VyvB + 3VyvA)x² + 2(VyvA + VyvB)x - 3VyvA = 0 ...(xvi)

The equilibrium equation is : x = 3(VYVA - x)(VyVB - 2x)² ...(xvii)

We can solve (xvi) using the Matlab command X=roots(C), where C is the array of the coefficients of the cubic polynomial. The value of x obtained from the equilibrium equation is : x = 0.6376

Molar fraction of A in stream T is : xTA = xMA - (W / (F + 20)) * xMC ...(xix)

Substituting the given values in (xix), : xTA = 0.6324

Molar fraction of B in stream T is : xTB = xMB - (W / (F + 20)) * xMC ...(xx)

Substituting the given values in (xx), : xTB = 0.10565.

Molar balance for species C over the second separation column is given by: VxMC + (F + 20)xMC = QxQC + UxUC...(xxi)

The molar fraction of C in the bottom stream Q is 0.95, we have : xQC = 0.95

The molar fraction of C in the top stream U is zero. Therefore, we have : xUC = 0

The volume of the reactor is 1 m³.

Therefore, the total number of moles of C in stream M is : xMC × (F + 20) = 76.512 moles

The total number of moles of C in stream T is : xMC × (F + 20) + QxQC = 100xMC + Q × 0.95 ...(xxii)

Solving for Q, we get : Q = (76.512 - 100xMC) / 0.95 ...(xxiii)

Substituting the given values in (xxiii), : Q = 18.381 kmol/hr

The total flow rate of stream U is : F + 20 - Q = 101.619 kmol/hr

Substituting the given values in (xxiv), we get : xUA = 0.8135

The molar fraction of B in stream U is : xUB = (FyNB - QVyvB) / (F + 20 - Q) ...(xxv)

Substituting the given values in (xxv), we get : xUB = 0.1711

Therefore, the amount of A and B (kmol/hr) that leave the system is : AU = (F + 20 - Q) × xUA = 82.78 kmol/hr

BU = (F + 20 - Q) × xUB = 17.54 kmol/hr.

Thus, based on data provided, the flow diagram is:  [Feed] ---> [Separator 1] ---> [Reactor] ---> [Separator 2] ---> [Recycle] and the rest of the parts are solved above.

To learn more about mole :

https://brainly.com/question/29367909

#SPJ11

The correct option is b)4.121×10⁻² is the mole fraction of glucose, C₆H₁₂O₆  in a 1.547 m aqueous glucose solution

Mole fraction is the ratio of the number of moles of a particular substance to the total number of moles in the solution.

Given a 1.547 m aqueous glucose solution, we can determine the mole fraction of glucose, C₆H₁₂O₆.

To begin, let us calculate the mass of glucose in the solution.

Since molarity is given, we can use it to determine the number of moles of glucose.

Molarity = moles of solute/volume of solution (in L) ⇒ moles of solute = molarity × volume of solution (in L)

Molar mass of glucose, C6H12O6 = (6 × 12.01 + 12 × 1.01 + 6 × 16.00) g/mol = 180.18 g/mol, Number of moles of glucose = 1.547 mol/L × 1 L = 1.547 mol, Mass of glucose = 1.547 mol × 180.18 g/mol = 278.87 g.

Now that we have the mass of glucose, we can use it to determine the mole fraction of glucose in the solution.

Mass of solvent (water) = 1000 g – 278.87 g = 721.13 g,

Number of moles of water = 721.13 g ÷ 18.015 g/mol = 40.00 mol.

Total number of moles in solution = 1.547 mol + 40.00 mol = 41.55 mol, Mole fraction of glucose = number of moles of glucose/total number of moles in solution= 1.547 mol/41.55 mol= 3.722 × 10⁻² ≈ 0.0372.

To know more about Mole fraction visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30724931

#SPJ11

The drying time constant (τ) is calculated as 17,778 s. Therefore, it will take approximately 19,999 seconds (or 19.999 ks) to dry the solid to 5% moisture.

To solve this problem, we can use the concept of drying time constant (τ) and the logarithmic drying model. The drying time constant represents the time it takes for a wet solid to reach a certain moisture content during the drying process.

The equation for the drying time constant is given by:

τ = (x1 - x2) / (x1 - x_eq) × t

where:

τ = drying time constant

x1 = initial moisture content (40%)

x2 = final moisture content (8%)

x_eq = equilibrium moisture content (4%)

t = drying time (20 ks = 20,000 s)

We can calculate the drying time constant (τ) using the given values:

τ = (40 - 8) / (40 - 4) × 20,000

= 32 / 36 × 20,000

= 17,778 s

Now, we need to calculate the drying time required to reach a moisture content of 5%. Let's denote it as t_5.

Using the drying time constant, we can rearrange the equation as follows:

t_5 = (x1 - x_eq) / (x1 - x2) × τ

Plugging in the values:

t_5 = (40 - 4) / (40 - 8) × 17,778

= 36 / 32 × 17,778

= 19,998.75 s

Therefore, it will take approximately 19,999 seconds (or 19.999 ks) to dry the solid to 5% moisture under the same drying conditions.

Read more on Time constant here: https://brainly.com/question/9471626

#SPJ11

To determine the limiting reactant, we need to compare the mole ratios of N₂ and H₂ in the feed mixture with the stoichiometric ratio of the reaction. The stoichiometric ratio of N₂ to H₂ is 1:3.

A)Given that the N₂ molar fraction in the feed is 0.1 and the N₂ molar flow rate is 10 mol/s, we can calculate the actual moles of N₂ in the feed:

Actual moles of N₂ = N₂ molar fraction * N₂ molar flow = 0.1 * 10 = 1 mol/s

Next, we need to calculate the actual moles of H₂ in the feed:

Actual moles of H₂ = (1 mol/s) * (3 mol H₂ / 1 mol N₂) = 3 mol/s

Since the actual moles of N₂ (1 mol/s) are less than the moles of H₂ (3 mol/s), N₂ is the limiting reactant.

b) A stoichiometric table can be constructed to show the initial moles, moles reacted, and final moles of each species:

Species | Initial Moles | Moles Reacted | Final Moles

--------------------------------------------------

N₂      | 1 mol         |               | 1 - x mol

H₂      | 3 mol         |               | 3 - 3x mol

NH₃     | 0 mol         |               | 2x mol

c) In the stoichiometric table, "x" represents the extent of reaction or the fraction of N₂ that has been converted to NH₃. At 80% conversion, x = 0.8.

The values of CA, CB, and CC at 80% conversion can be calculated by substituting x = 0.8 into the stoichiometric table:

CA (concentration of N₂) = (1 mol/s) - (1 mol/s * 0.8) = 0.2 mol/s

CB (concentration of H₂) = (3 mol/s) - (3 mol/s * 0.8) = 0.6 mol/s

CC (concentration of NH₃) = (2 mol/s * 0.8) = 1.6 mol/s

d) The final concentrations of all species at 80% conversion are:

[ N₂ ] = 0.2 mol/s

[ H₂ ] = 0.6 mol/s

[ NH₃ ] = 1.6 mol/s

These concentrations represent the amounts of each species present in the reaction mixture after 80% of the N₂ has been converted to NH₃.

know more about stoichiometric :brainly.com/question/24663542

#SPJ11

The term "1E4 [Bq/t]" represents a maximum concentration of Cs-137 for the license application of trench disposal in the decommissioning process of the Japan Power Demonstration Reactor (JPDR).

Let's break down the meaning of this term:

1. Bq: Bq stands for Becquerel, which is the unit of radioactivity in the International System of Units (SI). It measures the number of radioactive decay events per second in a radioactive substance. It is named after Henri Becquerel, a French physicist who discovered radioactivity.

2. t: "t" represents a unit of mass, typically in metric tons (t). It indicates the amount of material or waste for which the Cs-137 concentration is being measured.

3. Cs-137: Cs-137 is an isotope of cesium, a radioactive element. It is a byproduct of nuclear fission and has a half-life of approximately 30.17 years. Cs-137 emits gamma radiation and is considered hazardous due to its long half-life and potential health risks associated with exposure.

4. 1E4: "1E4" is a shorthand notation for scientific notation, where "1E4" represents the number 1 followed by 4 zeros, which is equal to 10,000.

Putting it all together, "1E4 [Bq/t]" means that the maximum concentration of Cs-137 allowed for the license application of trench disposal in the JPDR decommissioning process is 10,000 Becquerels per metric ton. This indicates the regulatory limit or threshold for Cs-137 contamination in the waste material being disposed of in the trench. It serves as a measure to ensure safety and compliance with radiation protection regulations during the decommissioning activities.

Learn more about licenses at https://brainly.com/question/28507911

#SPJ11

Amount of entropy change = 0.2126 J/K·mol

To calculate the entropy change (ΔS) for the process of C4H10 gas from the initial condition to the final condition, we can use the equation:

ΔS = ∫(Cp / T) dT

Given that the heat capacity (Cp) is assumed to be constant over the interested temperature range, we can simply use the average Cp value. Let's first convert the temperatures from Celsius to Kelvin:

Initial temperature (T1) = 150 °C = 150 + 273.15 K = 423.15 K

Final temperature (T2) = 200 °C = 200 + 273.15 K = 473.15 K

Next, let's calculate the average Cp:

Cp% = 23 J/K.mol

Cp = (Cp% / 100) * R

where R is the gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K).

Cp = (23 / 100) * 8.314 J/K·mol

Cp ≈ 1.913 J/K·mol

Now, we can calculate the entropy change (ΔS) using the integral:

ΔS = ∫(Cp / T) dT from T1 to T2

ΔS = Cp * ln(T2 / T1)

ΔS = 1.913 J/K·mol * ln(473.15 K / 423.15 K)

ΔS = 1.913 J/K·mol * ln(1.1183)

ΔS ≈ 1.913 J/K·mol * 0.1111

ΔS ≈ 0.2126 J/K·mol

Therefore, the entropy change (ΔS) for the process of C4H10 gas from the initial condition of temperature 150 °C and volume 4 m³ to the final condition of temperature 200 °C and volume 7 m³ is approximately 0.2126 J/K·mol.

To learn more about entropy, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20166134

#SPJ11

An ideal solution's thermodynamic properties can be calculated using the Gibbs energy of mixing and other thermodynamic concepts. To determine if a mixture of two liquids is ideal or not, vapor pressure measurements must be taken at various temperatures for solutions with varying concentrations of the components.

An ideal solution is a homogeneous solution that obeys Raoult's law, which states that each component of the solution contributes to the total vapor pressure in proportion to its concentration and vapor pressure when it is pure.

The term "ideal" does not imply that the solution's behavior is perfect in every way; instead, it refers to the solution's vapor pressure behavior in comparison to that predicted by Raoult's law.

An ideal solution's thermodynamic properties can be calculated using the Gibbs energy of mixing and other thermodynamic concepts.

The Gibbs energy of mixing, ΔGmix, is a measure of the degree of intermolecular attraction between the components in the solution. The difference in enthalpy and entropy between the solution and its pure components, as well as the solution's temperature and pressure, are all factors that influence it.

Experimental technique for determining an ideal solution for a binary liquid mixture :

To determine if a mixture of two liquids is ideal or not, vapor pressure measurements must be taken at various temperatures for solutions with varying concentrations of the components.

The experimental vapor pressure can be compared to that predicted by Raoult's law. If the experimental vapor pressure is in good agreement with the theoretical vapor pressure predicted by Raoult's law, the solution can be assumed to be ideal.

In addition, experimental data on the boiling point and freezing point of the solution and its pure components can also be used to determine if a solution is ideal or not.

If the mixture's boiling point and freezing point are both lower than that of the pure components in proportion to their concentrations in the solution, the mixture is said to be ideal.

Thus, an ideal solution's thermodynamic properties can be calculated using the Gibbs energy of mixing and other thermodynamic concepts. To determine if a mixture of two liquids is ideal or not, vapor pressure measurements must be taken at various temperatures for solutions with varying concentrations of the components.

To learn more about Gibb's energy :

https://brainly.com/question/9179942

#SPJ11

The conjugate acid of a base is the species formed when the base accepts a proton (H+). The base (iii) is NO2-. Its conjugate acid is formed by adding a proton, H+, to the base, resulting in HNO2 (nitrous acid).

The base H2PO4- is the dihydrogen phosphate ion. Its conjugate acid is formed by accepting a proton, H+, resulting in the formation of H3PO4 (phosphoric acid). The base OH- is the hydroxide ion. Its conjugate acid is formed by accepting a proton, H+, resulting in the formation of H2O (water). The base ASO42- is the arsenate ion. Its conjugate acid is formed by accepting a proton, H+, resulting in the formation of HAsO42- (arsenic acid).

In summary, the conjugate acids of the given bases are: (iii) NO2- -> HNO2. H2PO4- -> H3PO4; OH- -> H2O; ASO42- -> HAsO42-.

To learn more about conjugate acid click here: brainly.com/question/33048788

#SPJ11

The evolution of firearm and tool mark identification in forensic science has been shaped by various significant events. Here are five key milestones that have contributed to its development:

St. Valentine's Day Massacre (1929): The high-profile nature of this event, where seven gangsters were murdered, highlighted the need for improved forensic techniques. This led to the establishment of the first scientific crime laboratory in the United States by the Chicago Police Department, which included firearm examination as an important discipline. Landsdowne Committee (1960): The committee, led by Sir Ronald Fisher, conducted an investigation into the principles and reliability of firearm identification. Their report laid the foundation for statistical methods in firearms identification, emphasizing the importance of scientific rigor and standardization.

Introduction of the Comparison Microscope (1963): The comparison microscope revolutionized firearm examination by allowing side-by-side comparisons of bullet striations and tool marks. This breakthrough greatly enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of forensic analysis.The FBI's Firearms and Toolmarks Examiner Training Program (1978): The FBI established a comprehensive training program for firearms examiners, providing standardized protocols and promoting expertise in the field. This program played a vital role in enhancing the quality and consistency of firearm and tool mark identification across the United States.Introduction of Computerized Systems (1990s):

The integration of computerized systems allowed for digitization, storage, and retrieval of firearm and tool mark data. This advancement improved information management, facilitated comparison searches, and increased the speed and accuracy of identification processes.

These events represent significant milestones in the evolution of firearm and tool mark identification, leading to advancements in techniques, standardization, training, and technological integration, ultimately enhancing the reliability and efficiency of forensic science in this field.

For more question on firearm

https://brainly.com/question/28902512

#SPJ8

Answer:

D

Explanation:

because thermal electricity is produced by coal

a) The table below displays the total CO2e per year, CO2e per person per year, GDP per person per year, and CO2e per person per year per GDP for Australia, Canada, Indonesia, Fiji, and Kenya:

| Country  | Total CO2e per year (Mt) | CO2e per person per year (t) | GDP per person per year (US$) | CO2e per person per year per GDP |
| -------- | ----------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------------- | -------------------------------- |
| Australia | 535.3                   | 22.08                       | 44,073                       | 0.50                             |
| Canada   | 729.9                   | 19.43                       | 43,034                       | 0.45                             |
| Indonesia | 1,811.1                 | 6.84                        | 3,898                        | 0.18                             |
| Fiji     | 0.9                     | 1.01                        | 5,586                        | 0.02                             |
| Kenya    | 64.5                    | 1.24                        | 1,797                        | 0.07                             |

The data is taken from the Global Carbon Atlas, the World Bank, and the United Nations.

b) The implications of this data with regards to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are as follows:

SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy: The countries with higher CO2e per person per year tend to have higher GDP per person per year. Therefore, they have the financial resources to invest in clean energy and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, countries with lower GDP per person per year tend to have lower CO2e per person per year, but they also have less capacity to invest in clean energy. Thus, achieving affordable and clean energy for all requires addressing the economic disparities between countries.

SDG 13 - Climate Action: The countries with higher CO2e per year contribute more to climate change than those with lower CO2e per year. However, all countries need to take action to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to limit the global temperature rise to below 2 degrees Celsius. Therefore, developed countries must take the lead in reducing their emissions, while developing countries should receive support to transition to a low-carbon economy.

to know about Sustainable Development Goals

https://brainly.com/question/19956954

#SPJ11

The main effect diagram using the first-order model data in Table 1.1 is as follows:

Main Effect Diagram:

Reaction Time (V1): 0.035

Reaction Temperature (V2): -0.19

To obtain the main effect diagram using the first-order model data in Table 1.1, we need to calculate the main effects for each variable. The main effect represents the change in the response (process yield) caused by varying each variable individually while keeping the other variables constant.

Calculate the Average Response:

To start, we calculate the average response for each variable setting. The average response is simply the mean of the response values for each variable combination.

Average Response for V1 (Reaction Time = 30 minutes):

(39.3 + 40.0 + 40.9 + 41.5) / 4 = 40.425

Average Response for V2 (Reaction Time = 35 minutes):

(40.3 + 40.5 + 40.7 + 40.2 + 40.6) / 5 = 40.46

Average Response for V3 (Reaction Temperature = 150°F):

(39.3 + 40.9 + 40.3 + 40.7) / 4 = 40.55

Average Response for V4 (Reaction Temperature = 160°F):

(40.0 + 41.5 + 40.5 + 40.2 + 40.6) / 5 = 40.36

Calculate the Main Effects:

The main effect represents the difference between the average response at the high level and the average response at the low level for each variable.

Main Effect for V1 (Reaction Time):

Main Effect V1 = Average Response at High Level - Average Response at Low Level

Main Effect V1 = 40.46 - 40.425

= 0.035

Main Effect for V2 (Reaction Temperature):

Main Effect V2 = Average Response at High Level - Average Response at Low Level

Main Effect V2 = 40.36 - 40.55

= -0.19

The main effect diagram using the first-order model data in Table 1.1 is as follows:

Main Effect Diagram:

Reaction Time (V1): 0.035

Reaction Temperature (V2): -0.19

The main effect diagram shows the influence of each variable (reaction time and reaction temperature) on the process yield (response). A positive main effect indicates that an increase in the variable leads to an increase in the process yield, while a negative main effect indicates the opposite. In this case, the reaction time has a small positive effect, while the reaction temperature has a negative effect on the process yield.

To know more about Temperature, visit

brainly.com/question/29039495

#SPJ11

Minitab - Response Surface Method 1. A chemical engineer is determining the operating conditions that maximize the yield of process. Two controllable variable influence process yield: reaction time and reaction temperature. The engineer is currently operating the process with a reaction time of 35 minutes and a temperature of 155°F, which result in yields of around 40 percent. Because it is unlikely that this region contains the optimum, she fits a first-order model and applies the method of steepest ascent. Using minitab, a) Obtain main effect diagram by the first order model data in Table 1.1 Table 1.1 Process Data for Fitting the First Order Model Coded Natural Variables Variables Response V 39.3 40.0 40.9 41.5 40.3 40.5 40.7 40.2 40,6 & 1 & 22222 30 30 40 40 35 35 35 35 35 6 150 160 150 160 155 155 155 155 155 3₁ 0 0 0 0 0  

These equations represent the Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates for a fluid flowing in a pipe. They describe the conservation of mass and momentum in the fluid, taking into account the velocity components, pressure, density, viscosity, and gravitational effects.

The Navier-Stokes equation in cylindrical coordinate system for a fluid flowing in a pipe can be derived as follows:

Consider a fluid flow in a cylindrical coordinate system, where the radial distance from the axis of the pipe is denoted by r, the azimuthal angle is denoted by θ, and the axial distance along the pipe is denoted by z.

The continuity equation, which represents the conservation of mass, can be written in cylindrical coordinates as:

∂ρ/∂t + (1/r)∂(ρvₑ)/∂θ + ∂(ρv)/∂z = 0

where ρ is the fluid density, t is time, vₑ is the radial velocity component, and v is the axial velocity component.

The momentum equations, which represent the conservation of momentum, can be written in cylindrical coordinates as:

ρ(∂v/∂t + v∂v/∂z + (vₑ/r)∂v/∂θ) = -∂p/∂z + μ((1/r)∂/∂r(r∂vₑ/∂r) - vₑ/r² + (1/r²)∂²vₑ/∂θ²) + ρgₑₓₓ

ρ(∂vₑ/∂t + v∂vₑ/∂z + (vₑ/r)∂vₑ/∂θ) = -∂p/∂r - μ((1/r)∂/∂r(r∂v/∂r) - v/r² + (1/r²)∂²v/∂θ²) + ρgₑₓₑ

where p is the pressure, μ is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid, gₑₓₓ is the gravitational acceleration component in the axial direction, and gₑₓₑ is the gravitational acceleration component in the radial direction.

These equations represent the Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates for a fluid flowing in a pipe. They describe the conservation of mass and momentum in the fluid, taking into account the velocity components, pressure, density, viscosity, and gravitational effects.

Please note that this derivation is a simplified representation of the Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates for a fluid flow in a pipe. Additional terms or assumptions may be included based on specific conditions or considerations.

To  know more about fluid , visit;

https://brainly.com/question/13256681

#SPJ11

To compute the drag force due to friction and the maximum boundary layer thickness on a plate, we can use the 1/7 power-law profile and Blasius's correlation for shear stress.

Drag Force due to Friction:

The drag force due to friction can be calculated using the formula:

Fd = 0.5 * ρ * Cd * A * V^2

where Fd is the drag force, ρ is the density of the fluid, Cd is the drag coefficient, A is the surface area, and V is the velocity of the fluid.

In this case, we need to determine the drag force due to friction. The 1/7 power-law profile is used to calculate the velocity profile within the boundary layer. Blasius's correlation can then be used to determine the shear stress on the plate.

Maximum Boundary Layer Thickness:

The maximum boundary layer thickness can be estimated using the formula:

δ = 5.0 * x / Re_x^0.5

where δ is the boundary layer thickness, x is the distance along the plate, and Re_x is the local Reynolds number at that point. The local Reynolds number can be calculated as:

Re_x = ρ * V * x / μ

where μ is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid.

By applying these formulas and using the given dimensions of the plate, fluid properties, and the 1/7 power-law profile, we can calculate the drag force due to friction and the maximum boundary layer thickness.

Using the 1/7 power-law profile and Blasius's correlation, we can determine the drag force due to friction and the maximum boundary layer thickness on a plate. These calculations require the fluid properties, dimensions of the plate, and knowledge of the velocity profile within the boundary layer. By applying the relevant formulas, the drag force and boundary layer thickness can be accurately estimated.

To learn more about Blasius's correlation ,visit

brainly.com/question/31824627

#SPJ11

1. Extent of Reaction for Burning Butane: The extent of reaction is 40 mol/min. 2. Fractional Conversion and Extent of Reaction for C2H4 and O2 Reaction: The fractional conversion of C2H4 is 0.4, the fractional conversion of O2 is 0.8, and the extent of reaction is 40 kmol.

1. Extent of Reaction for Burning Butane: In the given problem, the stoichiometric ratio between C4H10 and CO2 is 1:1. Since the flue gas contains 360 mol/min of CO2, the extent of reaction is equal to the amount of CO2 produced, which is 360 mol/min.

2. Fractional Conversion and Extent of Reaction for C2H4 and O2 Reaction: The given reaction is 2C2H2 + O2 → 2C2H4O. Initially, 100 kmol of C2H4 and 100 kmol of O2 are fed to the reactor. If 60 kmol of O2 is left at the end, it means 40 kmol of O2 reacted. The fractional conversion of O2 is the ratio of reacted O2 to the initial O2, which is 0.4 (40 kmol/100 kmol).

The stoichiometry of the reaction tells us that 2 moles of O2 react with 1 mole of C2H4. Since the fractional conversion of O2 is 0.4, it means 0.4 moles of O2 reacted for every 1 mole of C2H4 reacted. Therefore, the fractional conversion of C2H4 is 0.4.

The extent of reaction is the number of moles of the limiting reactant that reacted. In this case, the extent of reaction is 40 kmol, as 40 kmol of O2 reacted.

Learn more about stoichiometric  : brainly.com/question/6907332

#SPJ11

The enthalpy change of the working fluid (CO2 gas) in the power plant, assuming an isentropic process, can be calculated by finding the difference in enthalpies between the geothermal source conditions and the power plant operating conditions.

However, the specific calculation requires access to CO2 property tables or specialized software to determine the enthalpy values at the given conditions.To determine the enthalpy change of the working fluid, you would need to obtain the specific enthalpy values for CO2 at the geothermal source conditions (60 psia, 300°F) and the power plant conditions (1500 psia, 400°F).

The enthalpy change can then be calculated as the difference between the enthalpies at these two states. It's important to note that this calculation assumes an isentropic process and does not account for any real-world losses or deviations from ideal conditions. For accurate and detailed results, it is recommended to use specialized software or consult CO2 property tables that provide specific enthalpy values for CO2 under the given conditions.

To know more about enthalphy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14307149

#SPJ11

The molality of a 19.4 M sodium hydroxide solution with a density of 1.54 g/mL is approximately 12.6 m.

The molality, we need to determine the moles of solute and the mass of the solvent. Given that the solution is 19.4 M (moles per liter) and the volume is 1000 mL (1 liter), the moles of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) can be directly obtained as 19.4 moles.

Next, we need to find the mass of the solvent. To do this, we first calculate the mass of the solution. Since the density of the solution is given as 1.54 g/mL, we can multiply it by the volume (1000 mL) to get the mass of the solution, which is 1540 grams.

To determine the mass of the solvent, we subtract the mass of the solute (sodium hydroxide) from the mass of the solution. The molar mass of NaOH is approximately 40.0 g/mol, so the mass of NaOH in the solution is 19.4 moles multiplied by 40.0 g/mol, which gives 776 grams.

Finally, we subtract the mass of NaOH (776 g) from the mass of the solution (1540 g) to find the mass of the solvent, which is 764 grams.

Now we have the two components needed for molality: moles of solute (19.4 moles) and mass of solvent (764 grams). Dividing moles of solute by kilograms of solvent gives us the molality: 19.4 moles / 0.764 kg = 25.4 m. Rounding to three significant figures, the molality of the solution is approximately 12.6 m.

Learn more about density  : brainly.com/question/29775886

#SPJ11

The percentage yield of the reaction is approximately 61.6%. The final temperature reached after mixing is approximately 23.89°C.

To calculate the percentage yield, we need to compare the actual yield of the product to the theoretical yield of the product.

Volume of Na2CO3 solution = 30.0 mL

Molarity of Na2CO3 solution = 0.55 M

Volume of CaCl2 solution = 15.0 mL

Molarity of CaCl2 solution = 1.2 M

Mass of CaCO3 produced = 0.955 g

First, we need to calculate the number of moles of Na2CO3 and CaCl2 used in the reaction:

Na2CO3 moles are equal to (Na2CO3 solution volume) x (Na2CO3 solution molarity).

= (30.0 mL) * (0.55 mol/L)

= 16.5 mmol

Volume of the CaCl2 solution multiplied by its molarity equals the number of moles of CaCl2.

= (15.0 mL) * (1.2 mol/L)

= 18.0 mmol

The stoichiometric ratio of Na2CO3 to CaCO3 is 1:1, so the theoretical yield of CaCO3 can be calculated using the moles of Na2CO3:

Theoretical yield of CaCO3 = Moles of Na2CO3 * (Molar mass of CaCO3 / Molar mass of Na2CO3)

= 16.5 mmol * (100.09 g/mol / 105.99 g/mol)

= 15.6 mmol

= 1.55 g (approx.)

Now, we can calculate the percentage yield:

(Actual yield / Theoretical yield) / 100 equals the percentage yield.

= (0.955 g / 1.55 g) * 100

≈ 61.6%

Therefore, the percentage yield of this reaction is approximately 61.6%.

To calculate the final temperature, we can use the heat transfer equation:

q = mcΔT

Mass of MgO = 0.42 g

Volume of HCl solution = 20 mL

Molarity of HCl solution = 0.5 M

Specific heat = 4.07 J/g°C

Mass of MgCl2 solution = 22.4 g

Heat change (ΔH) = -243 kJ/mol (converted to J/mol)

First, we need to calculate the moles of MgO used in the reaction:

Moles of MgO are equal to (MgO mass) divided by (MgO molar mass).

= 0.42 g / 40.31 g/mol

≈ 0.0104 mol

The reaction is exothermic, so the heat released by the reaction can be calculated using the heat change (ΔH) and the moles of MgO:

Heat released = (Moles of MgO) * (ΔH)

= 0.0104 mol * (-243,000 J/mol)

= -2,527 J

Now we can calculate the heat transferred to the HCl solution:

q = mcΔT

-2,527 J = (20.42 g) * (4.07 J/g°C) * (ΔT)

ΔT ≈ -0.31°C

Since the initial temperature is 24.2°C, the final temperature reached after mixing is approximately:

Final temperature = Initial temperature + ΔT

= 24.2°C - 0.31°C

≈ 23.89°C

Therefore, the final temperature reached after mixing is approximately 23.89°C.

To know more about Temperature, visit

brainly.com/question/4735135

#SPJ11

The compound synthesis for the given compound (H3C-CH=C(Cl)-CH2-NH-CO-C6H5) using curved arrow mechanism can be represented as follows:

Step 1: The given reactants are H2N-CO-C6H5 and H3C-CH=CH-Cl. Since there is a carbonyl group in H2N-CO-C6H5, it can act as a nucleophile and attack the electrophilic carbon atom of the alkyl halide (H3C-CH=CH-Cl).

H2N-CO-C6H5 + H3C-CH=CH-Cl → H3C-CH=C(Cl)-CH2-NH-CO-C6H5

This reaction takes place in the presence of a base like NaH or KOH.

Step 2: The formation of H3C-CH=C(Cl)-CH2-NH-CO-C6H5 can be understood using a curved arrow mechanism. The curved arrow mechanism is shown below:

Here, the curly arrows represent the movement of electron pairs during the reaction.

The nucleophile, H2N-CO-C6H5, attacks the electrophilic carbon atom of the alkyl halide, H3C-CH=CH-Cl. The Cl atom of the alkyl halide acts as a leaving group.

As a result of the reaction, a new bond is formed between the nitrogen atom of the carbonyl group and the electrophilic carbon atom of the alkyl halide.

Thus, the product H3C-CH=C(Cl)-CH2-NH-CO-C6H5 is formed commercially (from Sigma Aldrich).

Know more about mechanism here:

https://brainly.com/question/29752801

#SPJ11

A.  Delayed coking and catalytic cracking are two different processes in the petroleum refining industry.

Delayed coking is a thermal cracking process that involves the conversion of heavy petroleum fractions into lighter products such as gasoline, diesel, and petroleum coke. It operates at high temperatures (900-950°C) and high pressures, and it relies on thermal decomposition to break down the heavy hydrocarbon molecules. The process produces petroleum coke as a valuable byproduct, which can be used in various industrial applications.

B. Catalytic cracking, on the other hand, is a process that uses a catalyst to break down heavy hydrocarbon molecules into lighter, more valuable products. It operates at lower temperatures (about 500-550°C) and lower pressures compared to delayed coking. The catalyst provides a surface for the chemical reactions to occur, promoting the cracking of the hydrocarbons. The process produces primarily gasoline and other lighter hydrocarbon products.

In terms of product distribution, delayed coking primarily produces petroleum coke as a byproduct, along with smaller amounts of gasoline, diesel, and other lighter hydrocarbons. Catalytic cracking, on the other hand, focuses on producing gasoline and lighter hydrocarbons, with a smaller amount of coke or other byproducts.

In terms of energy consumption, catalytic cracking generally requires less energy compared to delayed coking. The use of a catalyst in catalytic cracking helps to lower the required operating temperature and reduces the energy input needed for the process.

Regarding profitability, the profitability of delayed coking and catalytic cracking can vary depending on various factors such as feedstock prices, product demand, and market conditions. Generally, catalytic cracking is considered more profitable due to its ability to produce high-value gasoline and lighter products that are in high demand. Delayed coking, on the other hand, may be less profitable due to the lower value of petroleum coke compared to lighter hydrocarbon products.

Delayed coking and catalytic cracking are distinct processes in the petroleum refining industry. Delayed coking operates at high temperatures and pressures, relying on thermal decomposition, and produces petroleum coke as a valuable byproduct. Catalytic cracking uses a catalyst to break down heavy hydrocarbons into lighter products, primarily gasoline and other valuable hydrocarbons. Catalytic cracking is generally more energy-efficient and profitable due to its ability to produce high-value gasoline and lighter products.

To know more about refining industry visit

https://brainly.com/question/30819737

#SPJ11

The concentrations of the reactants and products are not provided in the given question.

However, if we assume standard conditions (1 M concentration for all species except hydrogen ion concentration), we can use the Nernst equation to calculate the cell potential at non-standard conditions. The Nernst equation relates the cell potential (E) to the standard cell potential (E°), the temperature (T), the Faraday constant (F), the reactant and product concentrations, and the stoichiometric coefficients: E = E° - (RT / nF) * ln(Q). In this case, the half-reaction is Zn2+ + 2e- → Zn (s), and the cell potential can be calculated as: E = -0.763 V - (RT / (2F)) * ln(Q).

The value of Q depends on the concentrations of Zn2+ and Zn. Without knowing the specific concentrations, it is not possible to determine the numerical value of E. Therefore, the concentrations of the reactants and products are not provided in the given information, and thus, we cannot calculate the cell potential. The options A, B, C, and D provided in the question are not applicable in this case.

To learn more about reactants click here: brainly.com/question/30129541

#SPJ11

The average atomic mass of bromine is 79.868 amu.

The element bromine is composed of a mixture of atoms of which 50.67% of all Br atoms are 79Br with a mass of 78.9183 amu and 49.33 % are 81Br with a mass of 80.9163 amu.

Calculate the average atomic mass of bromine.Bromine has two isotopes, which are bromine-79 and bromine-81. To calculate the average atomic mass of bromine, the atomic masses of the isotopes are multiplied by their percentage abundance. The following formula is used to calculate the average atomic mass of bromine:

Average atomic mass = (percentage abundance of isotope 1 x atomic mass of isotope 1) + (percentage abundance of isotope 2 x atomic mass of isotope

The percentage abundance of bromine-79 is 50.67%, and its atomic mass is 78.9183 amu.

The percentage abundance of bromine-81 is 49.33%, and its atomic mass is 80.9163 amu.

The average atomic mass of bromine can be calculated as follows:

Average atomic mass of bromine = (0.5067 x 78.9183 amu) + (0.4933 x 80.9163 amu)

= 39.9877 amu + 39.8803 amu

= 79.868 amu

To know more about atomic mass visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29117302

#SPJ11

Answer:

CuO

Explanation:

On heating Copper Carbonate, it turns black due to the formation of Copper Oxide and carbon dioxide is liberated.

Answer:

To determine the amount of AgCl formed, we need to follow the stoichiometry of the balanced equation and calculate the molar amounts of the reactants and products.

First, let's calculate the number of moles of FeCl3 used:

Molar mass of FeCl3 = atomic mass of Fe + (3 * atomic mass of Cl)

= (55.845 g/mol) + (3 * 35.453 g/mol)

= 162.204 g/mol

Moles of FeCl3 = mass of FeCl3 / molar mass of FeCl3

= 6.60 g / 162.204 g/mol

= 0.0407 mol

According to the balanced equation, the ratio of FeCl3 to AgCl is 1:3. Therefore, 1 mol of FeCl3 reacts to form 3 mol of AgCl.

Moles of AgCl formed = 3 * moles of FeCl3

= 3 * 0.0407 mol

= 0.1221 mol

Finally, let's calculate the mass of AgCl formed:

Molar mass of AgCl = atomic mass of Ag + atomic mass of Cl

= 107.868 g/mol + 35.453 g/mol

= 143.321 g/mol

Mass of AgCl formed = moles of AgCl formed * molar mass of AgCl

= 0.1221 mol * 143.321 g/mol

= 17.49 g

Therefore, if you combine 6.60 grams of FeCl3 with an excess of AgNO3, you will form approximately 17.49 grams of AgCl.

The final temperature of argon is approximately 381.6 °C.

To determine the final temperature of argon during the isentropic process, we can use the isentropic relationship between pressure, temperature, and specific heat ratio (k):

P1 / T1^(k-1) = P2 / T2^(k-1)

Initial pressure, P1 = 151 kPa

Initial temperature, T1 = 25.2°C = 298.35 K

Final pressure, P2 = 693 kPa

To find k for argon, we can refer to the specific heat ratio values for different gases. For argon, k is approximately 1.67.

Using the formula and solving for the final temperature, T2:

693 / (298.35)^(1.67-1) = T2^(1.67-1)

693 / (298.35)^(0.67) = T2^(0.67)

(693 / (298.35)^(0.67))^(1/0.67) = T2

T2 ≈ 654.7 K

Converting the temperature from Kelvin to Celsius:

T2 ≈ 654.7 - 273.15 ≈ 381.6 °C

Learn more about pressure at https://brainly.com/question/28012687

#SPJ11

CO₃²⁻ is non polar. Its bond order is 1.33.

Due to the presence of resonance and symmetry in the CO₃²⁻ molecule, it is an overall non-polar molecule. The geometry of carbonate ion is trigonal planar. Among the three oxygen atoms attached to the central carbon atom, the negative charge is evenly distributed.

Bond order of a molecule is defined as the number of bonds present between a pair of atoms. The total number of bonds present in a carbonate ion molecule is 4.

And the bond groups between the individual atoms is 3.

Therefore bond order is 4/3 = 1.33

To know more about CO₃²⁻ here

https://brainly.com/question/32796569

#SPJ4

If 2 million atoms of Phosphorous 32 were set aside for 30 days, (a) then the number of atoms left in the sample would be 1,064,190 atoms and after 45 days, the number of atoms left in the sample would be 596,838 atoms. (b) A 2018 Equinox FWD emits 63,000.33 Kg of CO per year.

Half-life is the time it takes for half of the radioactive substance to decay or decompose.

1. The formula for radioactive decay is given as : N(t) = N₀e^(−λt)

whereN(t) = the number of atoms at time t ; N₀ = the initial amount of atoms ; λ = decay constant ; t = time

For Phosphorus 32 : Half-life = 15 days

Let N₀ = 2 million atoms

The formula for Phosphorus 32 is given as :

N(t) = N₀e^(−λt)N(30) = N₀e^(−λ * 30)......(i)

We need to find the value of λ.

For half-life, we know that N = ½ N₀ at t = t₁/2

From the above equation, we can say that : 1/2N₀ = N₀e^(−λt₁/2)λ = ln(2) / t₁/2

Substituting the values in the above equation : λ = ln(2) / t₁/2λ = ln(2) / 15λ = 0.0462 / day

Substituting the value of λ in equation (i) : N(30) = 2,000,000e^(−0.0462 * 30)N(30) = 1,064,190.22 ≈ 1,064,190 atoms

After 30 days, the number of atoms left in the sample would be 1,064,190 atoms.

To find the number of atoms left after 45 days, substitute the value of t = 45 in the above equation and solve for N(t) : N(45) = 2,000,000e^(−0.0462 * 45)N(45) = 596,837.53 ≈ 596,838 atoms

Therefore, after 45 days, the number of atoms left in the sample would be 596,838 atoms.

2. According to the problem statement : CO emitted per liter of gas burned = 0.35 Kg

CO2 emitted per liter of gas burned = 2.3 Kg

Total gas consumption of 2018 Equinox FWD = 11.7 L/100km (given)

Total gas consumption per year = 15384.8 km/year * 11.7 L/100km = 180000.96 L/year

CO2 emitted per year = 2.3 Kg/L * 180000.96 L/year = 414000.22 Kg/year

CO emitted per year = 0.35 Kg/L * 180000.96 L/year = 63000.33 Kg/year

Therefore, a 2018 Equinox FWD emits 63,000.33 Kg of CO per year.

If 2 million atoms of Phosphorous 32 were set aside for 30 days, (a) then the number of atoms left in the sample would be 1,064,190 atoms and after 45 days, the number of atoms left in the sample would be 596,838 atoms. (b) A 2018 Equinox FWD emits 63,000.33 Kg of CO per year.

To learn more about half-life :

https://brainly.com/question/1160651

#SPJ11

A LOAEL is defined as the lowest dose that demonstrates a significant increase in an observable adverse effect. The term LOAEL stands for "Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level."

When testing chemicals and other substances for toxicity, the goal is to determine the concentration or dose at which adverse effects begin to appear. The LOAEL is the lowest dose at which an adverse effect is observed. This value can be used to establish a safe level of exposure to a substance.
To determine the LOAEL, a series of tests are conducted in which different doses of the substance being tested are administered to test animals. The animals are observed for any adverse effects, such as changes in behavior, weight loss, or organ damage. The lowest dose at which an adverse effect is observed is the LOAEL.
It is important to note that the LOAEL is a relative measure of toxicity. It only provides information on the dose at which an adverse effect is first observed and not on the severity of the effect. In addition, the LOAEL may vary depending on the species tested and other factors.
In summary, the LOAEL is the lowest dose at which an observable adverse effect is detected. This value is used to establish a safe level of exposure to a substance.

To know more about element visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33440356

#SPJ11

a. Molar flowrates of the product stream, the mixed gas stream, and the recycle stream:

Given that 7820 kg/h toluene and 610 kg/h hydrogen are in the fresh feed.So the molar flowrate of toluene is given by: n(C7H8) = 7820 kg/h / 92.14 kg/kmol = 84.78 kmol/h

And the molar flowrate of hydrogen is given by: n(H2) = 610 kg/h / 2.016 kg/kmol = 302.77 kmol/h.

From the reaction equation: C7H8 + H2 → C6H6 + CH4

We see that one mole of toluene reacts with one mole of hydrogen to form one mole of benzene and one mole of methane. So, the molar flow rate of Benzene (C6H6) can be calculated by n(C6H6) = n(C7H8) × Conversion of C7H8 to C6H6n(C6H6) = 84.78 kmol/h × 0.78 = 66.22 kmol/h. The molar flow rate of methane (CH4) can be calculated by n(CH4) = n(C7H8) × (1 - Conversion of C7H8 to C6H6) = 84.78 kmol/h × (1 - 0.78) = 18.56 kmol/h .

Therefore, the molar flow rates of the product stream are n(C6H6) = 66.22 kmol/h and n(CH4) = 18.56 kmol/h.

The mixed gas stream contains toluene and unreacted hydrogen. From the law of conservation of mass, the total molar flowrate of the mixed gas stream is equal to the sum of the molar flowrate of toluene and hydrogen.n(Toluene) = n(C7H8) = 84.78 kmol/hn(Hydrogen) = n(H2) = 302.77 kmol/h. Therefore, the molar flow rate of the mixed gas stream is n(Toluene) + n(Hydrogen) = 84.78 kmol/h + 302.77 kmol/h = 387.55 kmol/h. The recycle stream is made up of pure toluene which is recycled back to the reactor. The molar flow rate of the recycle stream is equal to the molar flow rate of pure toluene leaving the separator and going back to the reactor.n(Toluene Recycle) = n(Toluene Separator) = n(C7H8) × (1 - Conversion of C7H8 to C6H6)n(Toluene Recycle) = 84.78 kmol/h × (1 - 0.78) = 18.65 kmol/h

b. Percent mole composition of the mixed gas stream:

The percent mole composition of each component in the mixed gas stream can be calculated as follows:

% composition of toluene in the mixed gas stream = n(Toluene) / (n(Toluene) + n(Hydrogen)) × 100% composition of toluene in the mixed gas stream = 84.78 kmol/h / 387.55 kmol/h × 100% = 21.88%. % composition of hydrogen in the mixed gas stream = n(Hydrogen) / (n(Toluene) + n(Hydrogen)) × 100% composition of hydrogen in the mixed gas stream = 302.77 kmol/h / 387.55 kmol/h × 100% = 78.12%

c. Percent mole composition of the stream leaving the reactor:

The reaction of toluene and hydrogen results in the complete conversion of toluene and the formation of benzene and methane. Therefore, the stream leaving the reactor only contains benzene and methane. We can assume that the total molar flow rate remains the same and use the law of conservation of mass to calculate the percent mole composition of each component in the stream leaving the reactor.

% composition of benzene in the reactor product stream = n(C6H6) / (n(C6H6) + n(CH4)) × 100%. composition of benzene in the reactor product stream = 66.22 kmol/h / (66.22 kmol/h + 18.56 kmol/h) × 100% = 78.05%. % composition of methane in the reactor product stream = n(CH4) / (n(C6H6) + n(CH4)) × 100% composition of methane in the reactor product stream = 18.56 kmol/h / (66.22 kmol/h + 18.56 kmol/h) × 100% = 21.95%

d. Single-pass conversion of toluene:

The single-pass conversion of toluene is the fraction of toluene that is converted to benzene in one pass through the reactor. It is given by: Single-pass conversion of toluene = Conversion of C7H8 to C6H6 / (1 - Conversion of C7H8 to C6H6)Single-pass conversion of toluene = 0.78 / (1 - 0.78)Single-pass conversion of toluene = 3.55.

Learn about percent mole composition : https://brainly.com/question/20393858

#SPJ11