Answer:
intermediate appellate courts
What does it mean if a crime is a conspiracy?
It violates federal civil rights statutes.
The reason behind the crime is hatred for a group.
The jury must be sequestered to hear the case.
More than one person is involved.
Eric is a Missouri resident and a sentenced offender. He was sentenced to three years of probation with the following conditions:
1. He must not violate any law of any state or any local ordinance.
2. He must report to Probation Officer Greg James monthly at a predetermined time.
3. He must not use any illegal substance or alcohol and must also submit to random testing.
4. He must obtain permission from Probation Officer James before traveling out of Missouri.
In his second year of probation, Eric was captured by store detectives stealing a satellite radio system from an electronics store in Orlando, Florida. The Orlando Police Department responded to the scene and investigated. After interviewing the store detectives, they issued Eric a misdemeanor appearance citation for shoplifting. The appearance citation contained a mandatory court date for the following month.
Approximately three months later, Probation Officer James received a letter from the local district court in Orlando, Florida. The letter informed James that probationer Eric was in Orlando in January, received a misdemeanor violation for shoplifting, and has since failed to report for the scheduled court date; a warrant has now been issued by the Orlando District Court. James reviewed probationer Eric’s file and found no record of any request to leave the state for any type of travel. Eric’s home address is listed as Springfield, Missouri.
Probation Officer James prepared all of the paperwork required to initiate probation revocation proceedings against Eric. James also sent Eric written notice that the terms of his probation had been breached and that his probation had been placed in jeopardy. The notice informed Eric that a hearing had been set for the probation revocation. During the hearing, Eric will have an opportunity to present evidence on his own behalf.
On the date of the hearing, Eric and James arrived at the courthouse to present their arguments before the presiding judge. During the hearing, Probation Officer James presented evidence supporting the alleged breach of the conditions of probation. He presented sworn statements from Orlando store detectives regarding the shoplifting incident and sworn statements from the Orlando police officer who issued Eric the misdemeanor appearance citation. Eric responded to the allegations by testifying that the Orlando misdemeanor case was a case of mistaken identity and that he was at home in Missouri during that time. James rebutted Eric’s testimony by restating that his witnesses (through their sworn statements) could attest to the fact that Eric was in fact arrested in Orlando for shoplifting the satellite radio system on the date in question. At the close of all testimony, the judge sent the courtroom into a fifteen-minute recess so that he could review all of the testimony and reread the sworn statements from the absent witnesses.
Approximately fifteen minutes later, the judge returned to the bench and announced his decision that Eric had violated the conditions of his probation agreement and should now be sent back to prison to serve out the remainder of the original sentence. The judge added that Eric will face the shoplifting charges upon release from prison. The court then served Eric with a written order stating all of the reasons for the probation revocation.
Can Probation Eric be prosecuted for shoplifting after release from prison, or would that constitute double jeopardy?
Answer:
Yes, he can be prosecuted.
Explanation:
It would not be considered Double jeopardy, since what he was being prosecuted for was something completely different. It was for shoplifting. Also, he violated the conditions for his probation, he violated the law of the state when he shoplifted.
what allows you to bend ur knees?
Explanation:
Cartilage is a layer of smooth tissue. It covers the ends of the thighbone and shinbone. It also lines the back side of the kneecap. Healthy cartilage absorbs stress and allows the knee to bend easily.Answer:
Cartilage allows me to bend my knees.
The first hate crime legislation was the Civil Rights Act of 1968.
False
True
Differential Treatment
<
In your opinion, what can be done to limit or eliminate differential
treatment when it comes to the courts?
Which act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly?
A. Securities Act
B. Sherman Antitrust Act
C. Nelson Act
D. Monopoly Reversal Act
Answer:
The (B) Sherman Antitrust Act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly.
This act made this illegal and you could be arrested. The main purpose of this act was to conserve competition is business.I hope this helped at all.
Answer:
B. Sherman Antitrust Act
Explanation:
Correct on Edmentum
State governments are required to
create two separate legislative houses.
collect sales taxes from citizens.
allow citizens to choose representatives.
O collect federal taxes from citizens.
Answer:
The answer for edge is;
C. allow citizens to choose representatives
Explanation:
edge answers ;p
The state governments are required to allow citizens to choose representatives. Thus, the third option is correct.
What is a state government?In a federal form of government, a state government is the entity in charge of a subdivision of a nation that shares political sway with the federal or national government. A state government may be subject to direct federal control or enjoy some degree of political autonomy. A constitution might outline this relationship.
The executive, legislative, and judicial branches of state governments are all fashioned after the federal government. All States must uphold a "republican form" of government, while the three-branch system is not essential, according to the U.S. Constitution.
Therefore, citizens are allowed to choose representatives by the state governments.
To learn more on state government, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/22946246
#SPJ7
Activity 6
Directions: Write TRUE if the statement is correct and FALSE if not. _______1. Blood distributes oxygen and nutrients throughout the body and assists in the removal of metabolic wastes.
_______2. The is the control center of the body.
_______3. Both the and the lungs support each other to allow distribution of nutrients and oxygen to all parts and the removal of metabolic wastes.
_______4. If the brain stops, all processes of all body parts will continue working.
_______5. The principal function of the lungs is to transport oxygen from the atmosphere into the bloodstream and to release carbon dioxide from the bloodstream into the atmosphere.
True 1. Blood distributes oxygen and nutrients throughout the body and assists in the removal of metabolic wastes.
False 2. The is the control center of the body.
False 3. Both the and the lungs support each other to allow distribution of nutrients and oxygen to all parts and the removal of metabolic wastes.
False 4. If the brain stops, all processes of all body parts will continue working.
True 5. The principal function of the lungs is to transport oxygen from the atmosphere into the bloodstream and to release carbon dioxide from the bloodstream into the atmosphere.
1.What is meant by executory consideration?A. Consideration provided by an executor.B.The exchange of consideration.Where consideration has already been completedD. Where there is a promise to do something in the future
Answer:
D, Where there is a promise to do something in the future
I hope this helped at all.
Which of the following is an example of an independent federal agency?
select all that apply.
FDIC
Amtrak
FEC
FCC
CIA
Fannie Mae
EPA
Answer:
FCCExplanation:
I hope it's helpful for you
Help me plss can someone answer these, Thank You!
Answer:
Answers Below.
Explanation:
1. True
2. False
3. True
4. True
5. True
6. False
7. True
8. True
9. True
10. True
Most of these are true lol XD
Question 3 (1 point)
Both Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier and Tinker v Des Moines dealt with freedom of
expression
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
orange zest or star frost? PLEASE HELP I NEED IT
Answer:
Starfrost
Explanation:
<3
Answer:
Orange Zest
Explanation:
<3 ( ' o ')
why Miranda is considered one of the most important cases in the history of our legal system
Answer:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Explanation:
Pleasantville police officers Fred and Barney were dispatched to investigate a robbery alarm call at the Hop-In liquor store. Central dispatch advised the responding units that they had attempted to call the store by phone, but there had been no answer. Upon arrival at the Hop-In, responding officers found the front door standing wide open and a male store clerk lying on the floor inside, deceased from an apparent gunshot wound to the chest. The cash register was empty and the store had been ransacked.
Officers quickly reviewed the store’s security videotape for evidence. The video depicted two male suspects, one wearing a red hooded sweatshirt and the other wearing a green T-shirt and blue baseball cap. Officers broadcast the suspects’ descriptions to other Pleasantville officers, and within an hour, two suspects were under arrest for the robbery and murder of the store clerk. The suspects were identified as Larry and Moe. Larry and Moe were booked into the Pleasantville jail and placed in separate cells pending follow-up by Pleasantville detectives.
The following morning Detective Smith interviewed the suspects separately about the robbery and murder. Detective Smith advised each of the suspects of his rights under Miranda. Both Larry and Moe refused to make any statement (invoking their Fifth Amendment protections) and demanded that they be placed back in their respective cells. Detective Smith called for jail guards to take the suspects back to their cells. As the guards were doing so, they noticed graffiti on the jail cell walls. In Moe’s cell, the wall read, “Sorry God for what I have done, no one was meant to die.” In Larry’s cell, the wall read, “I am innocent of murder, I may be guilty of robbery, but I didn’t kill anyone, it was Moe!”
Larry and Moe are charged criminally for the robbery and murder of the store clerk. During the trial the prosecutor attempts to enter the writings on the jail cell walls as evidence against both defendants. The prosecutor calls the jail guards as witnesses to testify that the graffiti writings were not on the wall prior to Larry and Moe being placed in their individual cells. The attorneys for Larry and Moe object to the writings being admitted as evidence. They base their objection on the fact that each defendant had clearly invoked his Fifth Amendment rights.
The judge advises the courtroom that she will need a few minutes to review the defendants’ objection and orders the court into a thirty-minute recess. Now it is your turn to be the judge. While reviewing defense counsels’ objection, you must decide the following:
1.Should the writings be allowed into the trial as evidence?
2.Can Moe's writing be used against him? Why or why not?
3.Can Larry's writing be used against him? Why or why not?
4.Can Larry’s writings be used against Moe? Why or why not?
Answer:
1-2-3-4 NO / Who's to say an officer didnt write that inside the cell to have a quick and speedy trial where they are both found guilty but one with a lesser term ? Even if prior to Moe and Larry being kept in SEPERATE cells , this would make it seem more evident that they are blaming Moe for the murder. Larry could have accepted a plea deal to get a shorter sentencing then Moe and only face Burgulary charges indefinite to the counts of murder Larry could face.
Explanation:
EVEN if this is true and Larry commited the henious crime , it cannot be used against him in terms of evidence since when he first got arrested and it was informed to him of his rights under Miranda Law he still pleas the fifth here in the excerpt "Both Larry and Moe refused to make any statement (invoking their Fifth Amendment protections)" this is prior to getting arrested and prior to being interrogated , This does'nt mean either of them are guilty yet BUT makes them look suspicious/guilty infront of the jury. This is because they didn't want to be interrogated or questioned.
THE RIGHT REASONING WOULD BE NO UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES!!!what are seven reasons police officers are allowed to exercise discretion in the day to do work?
Answer:
the law should be flexible in some ways in order to ensure that the spirit of the law is satisfied
whether to draw his weapon. whether to make an arrest. whether to issue a traffic ticket or other violation
Explanation:
The death rate due to collisions increased in all driving areas at night
Answer:
50% of traffic deaths happen at night
50% of road fatalities occur at night, and the death rate from collisions increased across all driving zones.
What is death?
The whole-brain standard states that human death is the permanent end of all brain functions, including those of the brain stem.
50% of road fatalities occur at night, despite the fact that we only drive 25% of the time then. Driving at night is always riskier, regardless of whether the route is well-known or not.
Hence, the significance of the death is aforementioned.
Learn more about the death, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26067728
#SPJ2
How many bones are in the human body?
Answer:
206 bones
I hope it's helpful for you ✌️Answer:
How many bones are in the human body?
→ Around 206 to 213 bones.What are 10 issues discussed in Article 1 of the Constitution?
Is anyone able to list 10 plz help me. Thank you
Which theory proposes that the best way to deter crime is with punishment that is strict, sure, and swift to outweigh any benefits of law violation?
General theory of crime
Choice theory
Social control theory
Critical criminology
Answer:
Deterrence theory states that if punishment is certain, severe, and swift, then people will refrain from committing criminal acts. Deterrence theory is at the core of the criminal justice system, and the basis for most of strict punishments and long prisons sentences.
Should questions of social policy be left to Parliament rather than being decided by the court?
Answer:
No,
Explanation:
They must be repeatedly be checked in Court because if they don't the government / parliament can misuse the power.
2: When passing another vehicle, you are allowed to exceed the speed limit by?
a) O 10 mph.
b) O 5 mph.
c) O 3 mph.
d) O 0 mph.
Answer: 10 mph
Explanation:
The passing of another vehicle, are allowed to exceed the speed limit by 10 mph. Thus, the option (a) is the correct.
What is vehicle?
Transport of persons and products from one location to another is referred to as using a “vehicle.” When traveling somewhere else, the automobile is useful. The car satisfies the necessities and necessities of the bare minimum. Different kinds of vehicles exist, including cars, buses, boats, spaceships, trucks, and airplanes.
The legal maximum speed for cars has been set by the government. The car was moving at a 45 km/h excess. People who use vehicles must adhere to the government's tight speed restriction requirement. The government is authorized to travel 10 to 15 mph faster than the posted limit.
Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on vehicle, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13390217
#SPJ2
How do mandatory minimum sentencing laws increase the power of prosecutors?
Answer:
Because if the mandatory minimum sentence is 25 years, they can work from there and just go higher.
Explanation:
Under what circumstances should a compensatory model be used when should a multiple hurdles model be used
Fires that occur as result of human action or inaction but without malicious intent are classified as:
Select one:
A. unintentional.
B. natural.
C. accidental.
D. negligent.
Answer:
C. accidental.............
Charles wants to invest his money in something that earns money steadily
with little risk. Which should he invest in?
O A. Government bonds
O B. Stocks
O C. Mutual funds
D. Hedge funds
Answer:
Government bonds............
Answer:
O A. Government bonds
Explanation:
Differences between Universal Citizenship and Global Citizenship
Answer:
The universal citizenship is provided to the citizens of a nation in all the country in which he is being present at the time of need universally. The global citizenship is provided to every citizen by any nation in which he is being present at the time of need globally on the basis of being a human.
Answer by : https://brainly.in/question/7556579
Explanation:
Which statement is true about early involvement of women in policing?
O A. Although police departments started employing police women in
the early twentieth century, it was not until the 1960s that women
began to hold higher-ranked administrative positions in policing.
O B. Early policewomen primarily worked with women and children,
rather than providing the same types of police services as male
officers.
O C. Prior to the appointment of the first policewoman in the early
twentieth century, police departments did not employ women,
other than occasionally to work as cleaners or secretaries.
D. The movement to involve women in policing was a fairly isolated
phenomenon, as women generally only worked in low-status non-
professional fields.
Answer:
the answer is b
Explanation:
Which law gives an organization more instruction and insight into the type of information security plans/policies required
Information security policy (ISP) is the law that gives organizations and companies insight into the type of plans and policies required for information security. They go over data leakage, data breaches, snooping, and control to information.
I hope this helps! :)
What is the process of redistricting?
[tex]\huge\text{Hey there!}[/tex]
[tex]\huge\boxed{\star \downarrow \mathsf{YOUR\ RUN\ DOWN\downarrow}\star}[/tex]
[tex]\bullet\ \large\textsf{When you hear or see the word \underline{} think of the word(s) \boxed{\bf distribute} or}\\\large\textsf{\boxed{\bf divide}. Now that we have that synopsis of what redistricting could}\\\large\textsf{possibly mean, we can now answer your given question.}[/tex]
[tex]\huge\boxed{\mathsf{\star \downarrow ANSWER\downarrow}\star}[/tex]
[tex]\bullet \ \large\textsf{Basically, \underline{\underline{process of redistricting}} means: \boxed{\bf the \ illustration}}\\\large\textsf{\boxed{\bf or \drawing \ of \ a(n) \ electoral \ district \ map.}}\huge\checkmark[/tex]
[tex]\huge\boxed{\star \downarrow\mathsf{RANDOM\ FACTOID}\downarrow\star }[/tex]
[tex]\bullet \ \large\textsf{Electoral district map shows the administration (distribution) of a}\\\large\textsf{region (constituency) over a particular country}[/tex]
[tex]\huge\text{Good luck on your assignment \& enjoy your day!}[/tex]
~[tex]\large\boxed{\frak{Amphitrite1040:)}}[/tex]
Answer with Explanation:
Redistricting is the process of redrawing district boundaries when a state has more representatives than districts. Redistricting occurs every ten years, with the national census. Gerrymandering. manipulate the boundaries of (an electoral constituency) so as to favor one party or class.