Humans' flaws and failings was a consistent concern of Shakespeare.
Shakespeare explored the human condition in his plays, often examining how our flaws can lead to our demise. In many of his comedies, he showed how hubris or arrogance can lead to folly, while in his tragedies, he explored how our weaknesses can lead to destruction. He was particularly interested in the idea of tragic flaws, such as ambition or pride, and how these traits can lead to downfall.
He also explored how our emotions, such as love and hate, can cause us to make bad decisions, leading to sorrow and tragedy. Through his plays, he showed how our human flaws can be both destructive and redemptive, and that even in our darkest moments, we can still find hope and redemption. Shakespeare's examination of the human condition is one of his most enduring legacies, and it shows us that no matter how much we struggle and make mistakes, there is still a chance for us to make things right.
To learn more about Shakespeare link is here:
brainly.com/question/8912844
#SPJ4
The complete question is :
In the comedies as well as the tragedies, what was a consistent concern of Shakespeare? multiple choice question.
a) humans' flaws and failings
b) history
c) formal
d) style
e) spirituality
4.05 mc
using what you learned in the lesson, write an effective hook to introduce your topic and get your audience's attention. write in complete sentences and state the hook strategy you chose to use.
An effective hook is a strategy used to capture the audience's attention and motivate them to continue reading or listening to the topic being presented. There are many types of hooks, including a surprising fact, a rhetorical question, a quote, a personal anecdote, or a statistic.
For example, to introduce a topic about the importance of sleep, a hook strategy could be a surprising fact such as "Did you know that humans spend approximately one-third of their lives sleeping?" This hook grabs the audience's attention by providing a surprising fact and stimulates their curiosity to learn more about the topic.
Alternatively, a quote from a famous person could be used as a hook strategy to introduce a topic about perseverance. For instance, "The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall," Nelson Mandela once said. This quote serves as a hook because it encourages the audience to think about what it means to persevere and can motivate them to learn more about the topic.
Overall, the hook strategy chosen should be engaging and relevant to the topic at hand, as it can set the tone for the rest of the presentation or written work.
This hook strategy engages the audience by making them think about the severity of the issue and what actions they can take to address it.
Learn more about Effective hook at
brainly.com/question/30126192
#SPJ4
What is the author’s overall purpose in the text? Banksy and the tradition of destroying art
A
to explore the motivations for Banksy, and other artists, to destroy their art
B
to show how artists have been able to increase the market value of their art
C
to reveal to readers how Banksy was able to destroy his own art after it sold
D
to show how the art world’s interest is always changing and difficult to predict
A) Banksy and the tradition of destroying art is to explore the motivations for Banksy, and other artists, to destroy their art.
The author analyzes Banksy's notorious artwork" Girl with Balloon," which was incompletely destroyed by a shredder erected into its frame after being vended at an transaction. The author also provides exemplifications of other artists who have destroyed their own artwork, similar as Marcel Duchamp, who famously inked a urinal and called it" Fountain."
The author argues that artists have colorful provocations for destroying their art, similar as challenging the traditional conception of art, critiquing the art request, or making a statement about the transitory nature of art. The author also points out how the destruction of art can occasionally increase its value, as it creates a rare and unique piece.
Learn more about art at
https://brainly.com/question/23289473
#SPJ4
In book six of the Odyssey, “Nausicaa protects herself by instructing Odysseus to…?”
She tells him to get directions to the palace, and then enter the palace and walk straight to Nausicaa's mother, Arete
2 examples of sentences using particles that are argumentative.
Examples of particles used in argumentative sentences are: 1. "It is absolutely essential that we take action now."
2. "There is no way around it, we must do something."
Particles are small words that are used to express an idea or opinion. They help to make an argument more convincing, because they can add emphasis to a point.
Using particles in argumentative sentences is a great way to add emphasis and make a point. They can be used to emphasize the importance of an issue or to make a point more clearly. By adding particles to a sentence, it makes it more persuasive and emphatic.
They are also used to signal the strength of certain opinions, to give emphasis to an idea, or to add an element of urgency. Particles can bring an argument to life and make it more convincing. Ultimately, using particles can help to make an argument more effective and powerful.
know more about argumentative sentences here
https://brainly.com/question/12309084#
#SPJ11
Arianna
paints
and
draws
good
but
her
real
talent
is
creative
writing
She
can
make
even
the
most
boring
situations
exciting
through
her
use
of
words
Answer:
The rhetorical device used in this sentence is D. Antithesis.
Explanation:
Antithesis is a rhetorical device that places two contrasting ideas or concepts together in a balanced phrase or sentence to create a contrast or opposition. In this sentence, the contrast is between Arianna's skills in painting and drawing versus her real talent in creative writing. The sentence is structured in a way that highlights the contrast between the two skills, making the point that while Arianna is good at painting and drawing, her true talent lies in creative writing. The contrast between the two skills is emphasized by the use of the word "but" in the middle of the sentence, which signals a shift in focus from one idea to the other.
Tarshis writes, "The Titanic’s crew had been warned that icebergs lurked in the ship’s path. " The word "lurked " *
The word "lurked" in this context means that the icebergs were present in the ship's path, but they were not visible on the surface of the water.
The word "lurked" implies a sense of danger or threat because the icebergs were hidden and could potentially cause harm to the ship.
The use of this word also creates a sense of foreboding and anticipation in the reader, as they know that the crew has been warned about the icebergs, but the ship is still moving towards them.
In this way, the word "lurked" helps to build tension and suspense in the narrative, and prepares the reader for the impending disaster that is about to occur.
To know more about icebergs refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/4965256
#SPJ11
Complete Question
Tarshis writes, "The Titanic’s crew had been warned that icebergs lurked in the ship’s path. " The word "lurked " in this context means what?
Document: "How 400,000 People Landed Apollo 11 on the Moon"
Read these sentences from paragraph 2 to answer the question below.
“But between the micrometeoroids (specks of rock in space), the lack of oxygen, the searing 250-degree heat in the sun, and the bone-chilling minus 250 in the shadows, walking on the moon would clearly be no walk in the park.”
5. How does the author use a metaphor to advance the overall appeal in the passage? (R.3.4)
It appeals to the fear of the scientists, by showing the doubt they had when executing the moon landing.
It appeals to the credibility of the author, by showing the circumstances that were considered when designing the space suit.
It appeals to the emotions of the audience, by showing the suspense felt by those involved in the planning of the moon landing.
It appeals to the logic of the reader, by showing the moon landing as something that should have been considered too dangerous to achieve.
Group of answer choices
The author uses a metaphor to advance the overall appeal in the passage as follows: It appeals to the logic of the reader, by showing the moon landing as something that should have been considered too dangerous to achieve.
The usage of metaphor in the passageIn this passage, the author used metaphor to describe the ugly conditions under which scientists would have to manage if they visited the moon.
First, he talked about the extremely hot temperature of the atmosphere and also talked about the fact that there was barely any oxygen for them to use. So, all of these appeal to the logic of the reader.
Learn more about metaphor here:
https://brainly.com/question/9418370
#SPJ1
In the ""raisin in the sun"" how does the check further divide ruth and walter?
In the play "A Raisin in the Sun," the check further divides Ruth and Walter by intensifying their differences in priorities and dreams.
The check, which is a life insurance payout due to the death of Walter's father, represents a significant sum of money that has the potential to change the lives of the Younger family. Walter wants to use the money to invest in a liquor store, believing that it will provide financial security and help him feel more fulfilled in his role as the family's provider.
Ruth, on the other hand, is more focused on the immediate needs of the family, such as a better living situation and improving their quality of life.
The arrival of the check exacerbates the tensions between Ruth and Walter, as their conflicting desires become more apparent. Walter feels emasculated by his inability to provide for his family in the way he wants to, and he sees the check as his opportunity to take control and make a significant change.
Ruth, meanwhile, is worried about the risks associated with Walter's proposed investment and is more concerned with finding stability for their family. This difference in priorities creates a rift between Ruth and Walter, causing them to argue and ultimately putting a strain on their relationship.
In summary, the check in "A Raisin in the Sun" serves to further divide Ruth and Walter by highlighting their differing goals and priorities, leading to increased tension and conflict in their relationship.
To know more about A Raisin in the Sun, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30390382?#
#SPJ11
Which poetic device does Yeats use in the following excerpt from "He Wishes for the Cloths of Heaven"?
"dim and dark cloths"
A. alliteration
B. onomatopoeia
C. assonance
D. metaphor
Answer:
A. alliteration
the letter D is repetted for which its an alliteration
Based on the reading selection "the leap" what does it take to survive in a crisis
Based on the reading selection "The Leap," surviving in a crisis requires several key factors, including quick thinking, adaptability, determination, and physical ability.
In a crisis situation, it is crucial to assess the circumstances rapidly and make split-second decisions. This quick thinking can be the difference between life and death. Additionally, adaptability allows individuals to change their plans or strategies when faced with unexpected challenges, increasing their chances of survival.
Determination is another vital component, as it drives people to persevere even when the odds seem stacked against them. This mental strength can help individuals overcome obstacles and push forward despite adversity. Lastly, physical ability plays a significant role in survival, as it may be necessary to perform physically demanding tasks, such as climbing, swimming, or running, to escape danger.
In summary, to survive a crisis in "The Leap," one must exhibit quick thinking, adaptability, determination, and physical ability, all of which are essential for overcoming challenges and staying alive in high-pressure situations.
To know more about The Leap, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28453081#
#SPJ11
Question
Why could the Knights of Malta be considered an ethnocentric group
The Knights of Malta could be considered an ethnocentric group because they prioritized their own culture and religion over others.
Ethnocentrism refers to the belief that one's own ethnic group, culture, or nation is superior to others. In the case of the Knights of Malta, they were a Catholic military order founded in the 11th century, initially to provide medical care to Christian pilgrims in the Holy Land.
As the order evolved, it took on a more militaristic role, defending Christian territories and fighting against Muslim forces. This religious focus and their dedication to protecting Christianity can be seen as ethnocentric, as they believed their faith to be superior and were willing to fight for its dominance.
Additionally, the Knights of Malta were predominantly composed of European nobility, which further reinforces their ethnocentric perspective as they viewed themselves as superior to other ethnic and social groups.
In summary, the Knights of Malta can be considered an ethnocentric group due to their strong emphasis on promoting and defending their own religion, culture, and social class, often at the expense of others.
To know more about ethnocentric refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/11786995#
#SPJ11
What would be a good introduction for the text ‘High Incomes Don’t Bring You Happiness’
We often hear phrases like "money can't buy happiness," yet we continue to chase after financial success and material possessions.
What would be a good enough beginning for the matter ‘High Incomes Don’t Bring You Happiness’?Here's a possible introduction for the text 'High Incomes Don’t Bring You Happiness':
In today's society, many people believe that money and success are the keys to happiness. We frequently hear expressions like "money can't buy happiness," yet we continue to pursue financial attainment and material ownerships. However, recent studies have shown that high incomes and material wealth may not be as important to our happiness as we once thought. In fact, research suggests that other factors, such as social connections, personal values, and meaningful experiences, may play a much greater role in our overall well-being. In this article, we will explore the idea that high incomes don't bring you happiness, and examine some of the reasons why.
Learn more about wealth here:
https://brainly.com/question/17011735
#SPJ1
List three adjectives that can be used to describe a pair of shoes. each adjective should connote a different feeling about the shoes. create a metaphor comparing something to shoes using one of your adjectives.
Three adjectives that can be used to describe a pair of shoes are durable, stylish, comfortable.
1. Stylish: The shoes were as stylish as a swan gliding across a lake. The shoes had a sleek, sophisticated look that could make any outfit look fashionable.
2. Comfortable: The shoes were as comfortable as a warm hug. They fit snugly on the feet, making them perfect for a long day of walking or running.
3. Durable: The shoes were as durable as a brick wall. No matter how much wear and tear they received, they always held up and provided protection from the elements.
Metaphor: The shoes were as stylish as a swan gliding across a lake.
To learn more about metaphor link is here
brainly.com/question/13020675
#SPJ4
It refers to a situation in which people convene as one to discuussan issue
The term you are referring to is a "group discussion" or "forum."
A group discussion is a situation where people convene as one to discuss an issue, allowing participants to share ideas, perspectives, and opinions.
In a group discussion, individuals come together to exchange their thoughts on a specific topic, often with the goal of reaching a consensus or generating new ideas. This collaborative approach encourages open communication, active listening, and respect for diverse viewpoints.
Group discussions can occur in various settings, such as educational institutions, workplaces, or community events.
These forums often lead to better decision-making, enhanced problem-solving, and increased understanding among participants. By engaging in a group discussion, individuals can learn from others, challenge their own beliefs, and contribute to the collective wisdom of the group.
To know more about decision-making click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/31422716#
#SPJ11
Which major sound device die the poet use to empathize the river’s purpose in the stanza
The major sound device the poet used to emphasize the river's purpose in the stanza is "alliteration."
Alliteration is the repetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of words in a line or phrase, which creates a rhythmic effect.
Alliteration enhances the flow and musicality of the stanza, helping to convey the movement and purpose of the river. By employing this sound device, the poet draws attention to the river's journey and emphasizes its significance in the poem.
The repetition of sounds mirrors the repetitive nature of the river's motion, connecting the form and content of the stanza. Additionally, alliteration can evoke specific moods or emotions, further highlighting the poet's intended message about the river's purpose.
In summary, the use of alliteration in the stanza effectively emphasizes the river's purpose by creating a rhythmic and emotionally resonant poetic experience for the reader.
To know more about Alliteration click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/9160973#
#SPJ11
fix the one word that is used incorrectly?I was surprised to learn that Tim Oliver, whose given hundreds of presentations
at conferences and university events, is actually terrified of public speaking.
The word "whose" is used incorrectly here. The correct word to use in this context is "who has".
The sentence "I was surprised to learn that Tim Oliver, whose given hundreds of presentations at conferences and university events, is actually terrified of public speaking" contains a grammatical error.
The original sentence uses the pronoun "whose" to describe an action performed by Tim Oliver. This is not a correct use of the word "whose," which is a possessive pronoun used to show ownership or belonging.
A correct way to express the same idea is to use the present perfect tense of the verb "to have," which is "who has." This construction indicates a completed action in the past with a connection to the present.
The revised version of the sentence that is appropriate could be:
"It was surprising to discover that Tim Oliver, who has presented at numerous conferences and university events, is actually terrified of public speaking.
To learn more about tenses or fixing the incorrect word,
https://brainly.com/question/30104360
https://brainly.com/question/17774917
As the head prefect of your school,you are to give a speech at the schools anniversary on the topic"education the key to personal liberation". Write down your speech
Good evening everyone. I am honoured to be here to represent our school and to give the speech on the topic “Education the key to personal liberation”.
Education is the fundamental way to freedom. It provides the skills and knowledge to understand the world and to make informed decisions. Education is a means to overcome the barriers of poverty, gender, race or national origin. It helps to reduce discrimination, increases opportunities for employment and helps to create a sense of self-worth.
Education is not only about knowledge, it is also about understanding. It helps to create an understanding of different cultures, languages, religions, and beliefs. This understanding can help us to be tolerant and accepting of others.
Education helps us to break away from traditional roles, stereotypes and expectations. It gives us the power to make our own choices and to create our own paths in life. It allows us to think critically and make decisions that will benefit us and our communities.
In conclusion, education is the key to personal liberation. It gives us the power to create our own future and to shape our own destiny. Thank you.
know more about Education here
https://brainly.com/question/18023991#
#SPJ11
How do the examples of gaga and goat demonstrate the
conflict in the story?
In the story, there is a conflict between the two main characters, Gaga and Goat. Gaga is a curious and adventurous character who wants to explore the world outside of their farm. Goat, on the other hand, is more cautious and wants to stay close to home. This conflict is demonstrated in the examples of Gaga and Goat's actions throughout the story.
For instance, when Gaga wants to venture out into the forest, Goat tries to persuade her to stay home, warning her of the dangers outside. However, Gaga is determined to explore and ends up getting lost, causing Goat to have to rescue her. This highlights the conflict between their different personalities and desires.
Another example is when Gaga finds a strange object in the forest and wants to investigate it, while Goat is hesitant and worried about the potential dangers. This disagreement leads to tension and further highlights the conflict between the two characters.
Ultimately, the conflict between Gaga and Goat is a key element of the story and drives the plot forward as the two characters learn to understand and appreciate each other's perspectives.
To know more about conflict, click below.
https://brainly.com/question/17085630
#SPJ11
Please answer!! i will give brainliest
write an argumentative essay of at least 750 words in which you argue that other female writers of the time would agree or disagree with fuller's statement: "what woman needs is not as a woman to act or rule, but as a nature to grow, as an intellect to discern, as a soul to live freely, and unimpeded to unfold such powers as were given her when we left our common home."
create a thesis statement that expresses your position, and then provide evidence to make your case. to strengthen your argument, show why the opposing view is weak or wrong (answer counterclaims). use quotations from the writers' works to support your ideas. include details about each writer that support your thesis. you may want to include differences and similarities between fuller and the writers, and explain how these elements may have affected them and their perspectives. your essay should include:
discussion of at least three female writers from the era (which you have studied in this unit)
clear organization of ideas, including use of transitions to demonstrate connections
properly formatted in-text citations and a works cited page, according to mla guidelines
Other female writers of the time, such as Mary Wollstonecraft, Emily Dickinson, and Charlotte Bronte, would agree with Fuller's statement that what women need is to grow as nature, an intellect, and a soul to live freely
Thesis Statement: Other female writers of the time would agree with Fuller's statement that what women need is not to act or rule, but to grow as a nature, an intellect, and a soul to live freely and unimpeded, and to unfold their inherent powers.
In the 19th century, women writers faced significant challenges in expressing their ideas and gaining recognition for their work. Many female writers of the time, such as Mary Wollstonecraft, Emily Dickinson, and Charlotte Bronte, wrote about women's rights and the limitations they faced. In this essay, I argue that these writers would agree with Margaret Fuller's statement that what women need is to grow as a nature, an intellect, and a soul to live freely and unimpeded and to unfold their inherent powers.
Firstly, Mary Wollstonecraft, a British writer, philosopher, and advocate of women's rights, would agree with Fuller's statement. Wollstonecraft's book, "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman," published in 1792, argued for women's equal rights and opportunities. In her book, Wollstonecraft writes, "I do not wish [women] to have power over men but over themselves." This sentiment aligns with Fuller's statement that what women need is not to rule or act, but to grow as individuals. Wollstonecraft also writes, "It is time to effect a revolution in female manners - time to restore to them their lost dignity." This idea is similar to Fuller's belief that women should be able to unfold their inherent powers and live freely without being impeded by societal limitations.
Secondly, Emily Dickinson, an American poet, would also agree with Fuller's statement. Dickinson lived in a time when women were expected to be domestic and subservient to men. Despite these limitations, Dickinson wrote poetry that explored themes of nature, love, and death. In one of her poems, she writes, "The soul selects her own society, Then shuts the door." This line suggests that women have the power to choose their own paths and live freely.
Finally, Charlotte Bronte, an English novelist, would also agree with Fuller's statement. Bronte's novel, "Jane Eyre," published in 1847, challenged societal norms and expectations for women. The protagonist, Jane Eyre, is a strong-willed and independent woman who refuses to conform to societal expectations. In the novel, Jane says, "I am no bird, and no net ensnares me: I am a free human being with an independent will." This statement aligns with Fuller's belief that women should be able to live freely and unimpeded.
Opponents of Fuller's statement may argue that women should have the right to rule and act if they so choose. However, Fuller's statement is not about limiting women's choices but rather about creating a society where women are free to grow and unfold their inherent powers without being impeded by societal limitations.
To learn more about Mary Wollstonecraft
https://brainly.com/question/30456188
#SPJ4
Question 3 explain why this is an effective comparison
An effective comparison because it draws attention to the similarities and differences between two objects or ideas. By highlighting similarities and differences, it allows for a better understanding of the objects or ideas being compared.
For example, if one were to compare two countries, it would be important to note differences in population, geography, culture, and economy. By comparing these various factors, one can gain a better understanding of how the two countries are similar and different.
In addition, this comparison can be used to draw attention to any potential issues or benefits that might exist between the two countries. By drawing attention to these similarities and differences, this comparison can be used to inform decisions and promote understanding.
know more about comparison here
https://brainly.com/question/10817601#
#SPJ11
complete question is :
Explain what is an effective comparison?
Two boards are 8 feet long. which inequality desceibes the possible lenghta of the third board so a triangle may be constructed out of the three boards? a. 2 < x < 14 b. 0 < x < 8 c. 0 < x < 16 d. 4 < x < 10
Two boards are 8 feet long. Inequality 0 < x < 16 describes the possible length of the third board so a triangle may be constructed out of the three boards. So the option c is correct.
According to the Triangle Inequality Theorem, any two triangle sides must add up to more than the third side's length.
So, difference of two sides < x < sum of two sides, will reveal the potential size of a triangle.
Therefore,
8 - 8 < x < 8 + 8
0 < x < 16
0 < x < 16 is a possible measurement for a triangle's third side.
So the option c is correct.
To learn more about Triangle Inequality Theorem link is here
brainly.com/question/1163433
#SPJ4
PLEASE HELP TY
What is the central idea of this poem?
Women must be happy in order to enjoy protection.
When protected, women experience total happiness.
Religious customs, like the Pardah, lead to
happiness.
No one, no matter how protected, can escape the
sorrow in life.
Answer:
the central idea of this poem is freedom and happiness
What quote shows how Pearson contributed to the way foreign countries regard Canada?
The given statement is "What quote shows how Pearson contributed to the way foreign countries regard Canada" We can refer to a quote by Lester B. Pearson himself: Canada is not a melting pot.
Canada is an association of peoples who have, and cherish, great differences but who work together because they can respect themselves and each other.
This quote highlights Pearson's influence on the way foreign countries view Canada. As a former Prime Minister of Canada, Lester B. Pearson contributed to shaping Canada's identity as a diverse and inclusive nation that values multiculturalism and cooperation. His vision of Canada as a country that embraces and respects differences has helped to shape the positive international perception of Canada as a tolerant and welcoming nation.
To know more about Canada: https://brainly.com/question/29526524
#SPJ11
1. We may think that basketball players earn lots of money just by playing in
competitions. But it is hard work, determination and their talent which has put them to
the place where they are. They have an opportunity to earn more money and luck
helps them win. Most of them are not selfish because they know the feeling of not
having the basic needs. They donate money to charity as well
Issue
Report
Basketball players are frequently perceived as wealthy, yet the majority of them work very hard and make many sacrifices in order to reach their present level of success. Their hard work, ability, and a little bit of luck are what allow them to make a living.
But it's not all about the cash. Many of these athletes are from low-income families and have experienced what it's like to lack certain necessities. They frequently give money to charities or provide assistance in their local communities as a result. This demonstrates that they are concerned about other people's welfare in addition to their own success.
Basketball players may be perceived as having a lot of money, but it's crucial to acknowledge the sacrifices they made along the way to succeed. Furthermore, a lot of them are generous with their money and donate it to charitable causes.
To learn more about Basketball players link is here
brainly.com/question/30673993
#SPJ4
Why was the type of man called a rake appealing to women
This rather arbitrary word is frequently used to characterise the hero in historical romances. A rake, according to Webster, is "a dissolute person; a libertine"—in other words, not a very good person.
Rakes frequently have a particular soft spot for ladies of all kinds. They are naturally aware of their sexuality and how to take advantage of it. Although typically applied to men, the "term" rakish can refer to any person who exudes charm, glamour, and a roguish edge with the potential to stir up scandal.
Think of the rake as a stunning, enigmatic, and sometimes deadly lady. A rake. The Rake is a seducer who relentlessly pursues their victim in an effort to pique her interest. Similar to how the siren influences men as a result of her.
Learn more about rake Visit: brainly.com/question/2555822
#SPJ4
Poem, "why i am no painter" frank o'hara
1-the poet is the speaker in this poem. what does his nonchalant and colloquial tone say about him and his approach to "art" and the artistic process?
2-what can you tell about o'hara and goldberg's relationship? are they good friends or just artistic colleagues? how do you know? 3-what is goldberg's artistic process, can you describe it?
4-what is o'hara's artistic poetic process, can you describe it?
5-how are goldberg and o'hara's artistic poetic processes the same?
In his poem "Why I Am No Painter," Frank O'Hara takes a nonchalant and colloquial tone that reflects his attitude towards the artistic process. He is unconcerned with the traditional notions of art and instead emphasizes the importance of creative self-expression.
Additionally, his casual approach to the poem reflects his friendship with the visual artist, Larry Goldberg, as it is a friendly, teasing dialogue between two friends. Goldberg's artistic process is focused on painting, sketching, and creating visual art. He uses traditional methods such as using a brush, canvas, and other physical mediums to create art.
O'Hara's artistic poetic process, on the other hand, is more focused on words and language. He uses metaphors and imagery to express himself and create meaning through his poetry. Despite the differences in their artistic processes, O'Hara and Goldberg share a similar aim in their art: self-expression. Both artists use their art to express their emotions, feelings, and experiences in their own unique ways.
O'Hara uses words and language, while Goldberg uses paint and canvases. Ultimately, both artists share a desire to create meaningful art that is reflective of their own unique perspectives.
know more about visual art here
https://brainly.com/question/30409976#
#SPJ11
How are the narrators feeling about guthrie and stella similar? Use two details fromt he story
The narrators feel admiration and respect for both Guthrie and Stella. They see them as strong, capable individuals who face their challenges head-on.
In the story, the narrators express similar feelings about Guthrie and Stella.
They admire their resilience and strength in overcoming obstacles. For Guthrie, the narrator appreciates his dedication to his work and his ability to persevere through tough times. For Stella, the narrator respects her independence and determination to live life on her own terms.
One detail from the story that supports this is the way the narrators describe Guthrie's hard work and determination, even in the face of adversity. Another detail is how they admire Stella's strong-willed nature and her ability to navigate the challenges of life with grace and confidence.
In conclusion, the narrators' feelings of admiration and respect for Guthrie and Stella are similar because both characters possess qualities of strength, resilience, and determination that the narrators find admirable.
To know more about face of adversity click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/31008403#
#SPJ11
How does paragraph 4 of the text contribute to the overall passage?
A. by proving that caves can be comfortable
B. by connecting the history of cave living to the present day
C. by explaining how the Matmata learned to dig into sandstone
D. by questioning why people would live underground
Determine the meaning of the word alacrity as it is used in the excerpt from The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, using context clues in the text. Write your definition of alacrity here and tell how you found it.
The word alacrity is used in the excerpt from The Adventures of Tom Sawyer when Tom exclaims, “I’ll do it with alacrity!”.
To discover the meaning of the word alacrity, I used the context clues in the text. From this it can be inferred that alacrity means with eagerness and enthusiasm. This can be seen in Tom’s response to his Aunt Polly’s offer of a reward for whitewashing the fence.
He enthusiastically accepted the offer, expressing his eagerness with the word alacrity. This can further be seen in his eagerness to get started with the task. By looking at the context of the word alacrity, I can conclude that it means eagerness and enthusiasm.
know more about Adventures here
https://brainly.com/question/28715373#
#SPJ11
He dress he wore was. …. Appropriate for the party. A. Quite B. Too C. Much D. So
From the words lettered A to D, choose the word or group of words that is best
completes each of the following sentences
"He dress he wore was quite appropriate for the party." is the complete sentence.
The sentence is incomplete and does not make sense as written. It is missing the word "not" before "appropriate" to convey the intended meaning that the dress he wore was not appropriate for the party.
With this correction, the best word to complete the sentence is "too" as it implies that the dress was not suitable for the occasion.
"Quite" would suggest that the dress was very appropriate, "much" would imply that there was an excess of appropriateness, and "so" would require additional context to convey a specific meaning.
It is important to pay attention to the context of a sentence and the intended meaning in order to choose the most appropriate word or group of words to complete it.
To known more about sentence refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/18728726
#SPJ11