i need help with this​

It is not entirely clear how Olmec civilization, which flourished in Mesoamerica from 1400 BCE to 400 BCE, justified human sacrifice.

The Olmec civilization emerged around 1400 BCE in the tropical lowlands of what is now Mexico. They are considered to be one of the earliest and most influential civilizations of Mesoamerica, known for their monumental architecture, art, and religious practices. The Olmec are credited with developing the first writing system and calendar in the region, as well as being early practitioners of a ballgame that had significant ritual and political significance. They built impressive stone structures, including colossal heads, and were skilled in the production of jade figurines and other artwork. Despite their impressive achievements, the Olmec civilization declined around 400 BCE for reasons that are still not fully understood, leaving behind a legacy that influenced later Mesoamerican cultures.

To learn more about Olmec civilization, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18089143

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

How do u think the Olmec justified human sacrifice?

LeMay claims there are no innocent civilians, but I disagree. The vast majority of Tokyo residents on March 9–10 were not directly engaged in the production of Aeroplanes or weapons.

They weren't actively participating in the war effort; they were just going about their daily lives, going to work, going to school, etc. In addition, the bombing of Tokyo was a senseless act of violence against civilians that resulted in a great deal of suffering.

Around 100,000 people are thought to have died as a result of the bombing, and many more were hurt or forced to flee their homes. LeMay's claim that there are no innocent people is false and ethically repugnant, and it is impossible to justify targeting civilians in this fashion.

To learn more about Tokyo bombing link is here

brainly.com/question/14893579

#SPJ4

The construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961 was a significant event that increased tensions between Russia and the United States.

The correct statement is that the Berlin Wall had created new restrictions on movement.

The construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961 had far-reaching consequences beyond just the escalation of tensions between the US and Russia. The wall divided families, friends, and entire communities, leaving a profound impact on the people of Berlin and Germany. It also symbolized the oppressive nature of communist regimes and inspired a global movement for greater freedom and human rights. The fall of the wall in 1989 marked a significant moment in history, but its legacy can still be felt today. The Berlin Wall serves as a reminder of the dangers of division and the importance of promoting unity and cooperation, both within nations and between them.

Know more about the Berlin Wall:

https://brainly.com/question/19520457

#SPJ11

A broader historical context relevant to the prompt is the colonization of Africa by European powers and their exploitation of African resources and labor.

European powers, including Britain, colonized various regions of Africa during the 19th and early 20th centuries, often with the goal of exploiting their resources and labor. This led to the subjugation of African peoples, who were treated as inferior and denied basic rights and freedoms. The British government, in particular, implemented policies that favored European settlers and did little to improve the lives of Africans.

This legacy of exploitation and inequality continued through the early 20th century, leading to the frustration expressed by the speaker in the prompt. The outbreak of World War II, with its need for manpower and resources, led to a shift in attitudes towards African participation in the war effort. However, this shift was not accompanied by a corresponding shift in attitudes towards African rights and equality, leading to continued tensions and frustrations among African peoples.

-----------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

"We have been invited to shed our innocent blood in this world war which is now in progress. In the past, it was said indirectly that Africa had nothing to do with the civilized world. But now we find that the poor African has already been plunged into the great war. The masses of our people are ready to put on uniforms, ignorant of what they have to face or why they have to face it. We natives have been loyal since the commencement of this (British) Government, and in all departments of Nyasaland the welfare of the British would have been incomplete without our loyalty. But in time of peace the Government failed to help the underdog. In time of peace everything was for Europeans only. But in time of war it has been found that we are needed to share hardships and shed our blood in equality. The poor Africans who have nothing to win in this present world are invited to die for a cause which is not theirs.

Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt?"------------

To know more about colonization , click here.

https://brainly.com/question/30900919

#SPJ4

The author of this statement is likely referring to the lack of understanding or recognition of the true threat that Nazi Germany posed to the world prior to the outbreak of World War II.

Despite early warning signs such as the Nazi party's rise to power, their aggressive territorial expansion, and the implementation of policies that targeted and oppressed minority groups, many people and governments failed to fully comprehend the extent of the danger posed by the Nazi regime.

There were a number of factors that contributed to the failure to recognize the danger of the Nazis. Many people at the time underestimated the extent of the Nazis' military and technological capabilities, and did not believe that they posed a significant threat to the balance of power in Europe. Additionally, the rise of the Nazis coincided with a period of global economic instability and uncertainty, and some countries may have been more focused on their own domestic issues than on the threat posed by Germany.

To know more about Nazi, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/5033467

#SPJ4

Answer:

Without additional context or a specific list of politicians to choose from, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, historically, politicians who have been associated with supporting individual rights include those who advocate for civil liberties, personal autonomy, and limited government intervention in private affairs. Examples of such politicians in the United States include Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, Ronald Reagan, and Rand Paul. However, views on individual rights and the role of government can vary widely between individuals and political parties, and are often shaped by a variety of cultural, social, and ideological factors.

Of the politicians listed, Thomas Jefferson was most supportive of individual rights. Option A is correct.

Thomas Jefferson was a strong advocate for individual rights and freedoms, as evidenced by his authorship of the Declaration of Independence and his opposition to the Alien and Sedition Acts. He believed in limited government and the protection of civil liberties, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press.

In contrast, Alexander Hamilton was more focused on a strong central government and economic development, while John Adams supported the idea of a government that balanced individual rights with the needs of the community. Aaron Burr's political views were often unpredictable, but he is not generally remembered as a champion of individual rights in the same way that Jefferson is.

Option A holds true.

The complete question:

Which of these politicians was most supportive of individual rights?

Learn more about individual rights: https://brainly.com/question/2535946

#SPJ11

Answer:

A: Only the federal government is powerful enough to completely end slavery.

Explanation:

Based on Abraham Lincoln's historical stance on slavery, he would likely not agree with the statement that only state governments should be able to make decisions about slavery and that the federal government should not interfere. In fact, Lincoln believed that slavery was morally wrong and sought to end it entirely. He believed that the federal government had the power and responsibility to take action against slavery, as evidenced by his Emancipation Proclamation and other measures he took during his presidency. Therefore, his response to this statement would likely be option A: Only the federal government is powerful enough to completely end slavery.

The unemployment rate momentarily decreased under the Reagan administration. Option (A) is appropriate because unemployment has just started.

For more accurate modeling of the impacts of unemployment within the economic system, a few categorizations of unemployment are utilized administration in addition to theories of unemployment. The five primary categories of unemployment are structural, frictional, cyclical, involuntary, and classical.

The focus of structural unemployment is on underlying economic issues and labor market inefficiencies, such as an imbalance between the supply and demand of workers with the requisite skill sets.

Arguments that follow a certain structure focus on the causes and solutions of disruptive technology and globalization.

Learn more about unemployment, from :

brainly.com/question/14227610

#SPJ1

The immediate result of the Emancipation Proclamation was that it declared slaves in the Southern states to be free and helped to shift international opinion in favor of the Union cause. Option B.

The Emancipation Proclamation was a significant moment in American history, and it had several immediate results. One of the most important outcomes of the Emancipation Proclamation was that it declared slaves in the Southern states to be free.

Although the proclamation did not end slavery entirely, it did provide a powerful statement of support for the abolitionist cause.

However, the immediate result of the Emancipation Proclamation was not a total end to slavery. The proclamation did not apply to states that had already seceded from the Union, which meant that slavery was still legal in some parts of the South. It also did not apply to states that were loyal to the Union, where slavery was still legal.

Another immediate result of the Emancipation Proclamation was that it helped to shift international opinion in favor of the Union cause. Before the proclamation, many European countries were sympathetic to the Confederacy, but the Emancipation Proclamation helped to change their minds.

By declaring that the Union was fighting for freedom and against slavery, the Emancipation Proclamation made it more difficult for European nations to support the Confederacy.

While the proclamation did not end slavery entirely, it was a significant step towards that goal, and it helped to change the course of the Civil War. So Option B is correct.

For more question on Proclamation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2776713

#SPJ11

The 54th Massachusetts helped to shape or change public opinion in the US in the following ways.

During the Civil War, the 54th Massachusetts was one of the first all-Black regiments to be formed in the Union Army.

Despite knowing it would be challenging and dangerous, the 54th Massachusetts offered to lead the assault on Fort Wagner in South Carolina. The bodies of the Black soldiers who died during the attack on Fort Wagner were not returned for appropriate burial by the Confederate forces, who instead dumped them in a mass grave.

Learn more about the Massachusetts here:

https://brainly.com/question/7148546

#SPJ1

As an officer in the Athenian army during the Persian invasion at Marathon, you must strategize and mobilize your troops to defend Greece against the enemy forces.

To accomplish this, begin by gathering intelligence about the Persian army, such as their numbers, weaponry, and battle strategies. Next, assemble your Athenian forces and form a battle plan, taking into consideration the terrain, your soldiers' strengths, and potential weaknesses of the Persian forces.

This could include using the element of surprise or taking advantage of the geographical features around Marathon, such as hills and narrow passages. Additionally, form alliances with neighboring city-states, such as Sparta, to strengthen your army and improve your chances of success.

Ensure that your soldiers are well-trained, motivated, and ready for battle. Finally, engage the Persian forces with confidence and a strong tactical plan to defend Greece and secure victory at Marathon.

To know more about Persian invasion click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29035476#

#SPJ11

Answer:

After World War I, senators in the United States objected to foreign policy decisions being made by international organizations rather than US leaders. This led to the rejection of the Treaty of Versailles and the US not joining the League of Nations. The rejection of the Treaty of Versailles and the failure of the US to join the League of Nations had significant consequences, as it weakened the international cooperation and collective security envisioned by the League, and contributed to the rise of isolationist sentiment in the US. This isolationist sentiment was a major factor in shaping US foreign policy in the interwar period, and it ultimately influenced the country's response to the rise of fascist regimes in Europe in the 1930s. The US's decision to pursue a policy of neutrality in the early years of World War II was influenced in part by the desire to avoid being drawn into another costly and deadly war, a sentiment that was rooted in the rejection of internationalism and the League of Nations after World War I.

Based on demand, farmers during the middle 1800s were put in a position to increase the size of their harvests mainly because their market had grown due to the steam locomotive and more affordable distribution (Option A).

The steam locomotive revolutionized transportation, allowing farmers to access broader markets and deliver their products more efficiently. As a result, the demand for agricultural goods increased, pushing farmers to produce more to meet the growing demand.

Furthermore, innovations such as the steel-tipped plow (Option B) made it easier and more efficient to cultivate larger areas, which contributed to the need to increase the size of their harvests. The steel-tipped plow allowed farmers to plow faster and more effectively, reducing the time and effort needed for preparing the land.

Finally, the local market for agricultural goods also experienced growth (Option C), contributing to the pressure on farmers to increase their production. The population growth during this time, as well as the expansion of cities, meant that there was an increased demand for food and other agricultural products.

Consequently, farmers needed to produce more to satisfy both the local and broader markets.

In summary, the combination of a growing market due to the steam locomotive, more affordable distribution, and innovations like the steel-tipped plow, along with the increased local demand for goods, placed farmers in the middle 1800s in a position where they had to increase the size of their harvests to meet the rising demand.

To know more about demand refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29703449#

#SPJ11

Cesar Chavez, the civil rights advocate and labor leader who co-founded the United Farm Workers of America, would most likely have supported migrant farmworkers striking for higher wages.

Chavez fought for better working conditions, fair wages, and the rights of migrant workers, particularly those working in agriculture. He believed in the power of nonviolent protest and used tactics such as strikes, boycotts, and hunger strikes to achieve his goals.

Chavez also supported the civil rights movement and worked with other leaders to promote equality and justice for all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, or background.

Overall, Chavez's advocacy for labor rights and social justice aligns with the goals and actions of migrant farmworkers who strike for higher wages.

To know more about civil rights refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/1142564

#SPJ11

The research question which is much too narrow is option 1. Who invented basketball.

A "Yes" or "No" response is usually the norm for narrow questions. "Are you coming with us next week?" is an example. "Can you envision how (your product or service) can assist you in achieving (the prospect's desired outcome)?

A research question shows in detail about what one wishes to understand by our hard work. Your research paper, dissertation, or thesis must be guided by a strong research question. Multiple research questions or problem statements might be required for a larger research project, like a thesis or dissertation. However, they must all be distinctly related to one another and concentrated on a single research issue.

To learn more about research question here

brainly.com/question/30299267

#SPJ4

Most of Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa did not industrialize and depended on exporting primary products.

Most of Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa did not industrialize in the same way as Western Europe and North America during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Instead, these regions were heavily dependent on the export of primary products such as agricultural goods, minerals, and raw materials, which were often produced on large plantations or extracted through mining.

This export-oriented model of development contributed to the growth of the global economy but also led to the marginalization of these regions, as they were often subject to exploitation by more developed nations. It was not until later in the 20th century that some Latin American and African nations began to develop their own industrial sectors, often with the support of government policies and international aid.

Learn more about export-oriented model at:

brainly.com/question/27951781

#SPJ4

Answer: Firstly, if this is wrong I'm very sorry, this is a kind of weird question, and also im in middle school. So there is a sort of conspiracy that America was involved because there were so many American companies in Vietnam. Do more research to ensure that this is correct first, but the Americans may have also helped France when the colonized Vietnam.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Gunpowder Empires, which included the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires, were able to conquer other empires and expand their territories for a variety of reasons. Here are three key factors that contributed to their success:

1. Military Technology: One of the main reasons that the Gunpowder Empires were able to conquer other empires was their advanced military technology. With the use of gunpowder weapons such as muskets and cannons, they were able to overpower their opponents and gain a significant military advantage. Additionally, the empires invested heavily in their military infrastructure and tactics, which allowed them to conduct large-scale military campaigns and conquer vast territories.

2. Centralized Government: Another factor that contributed to the success of the Gunpowder Empires was their highly centralized government structures. Unlike many of their opponents, they had strong and centralized governments with powerful rulers who were able to effectively manage their vast territories and maintain a strong military presence. This allowed them to quickly respond to threats and maintain control over their conquered territories.

3. Economic Resources: The Gunpowder Empires were also able to conquer other empires because of their abundant economic resources. They had access to rich agricultural lands, which allowed them to support large armies and maintain a strong economy. Additionally, they controlled key trade routes and ports, which allowed them to expand their trade and wealth. This economic strength allowed them to fund their military campaigns and maintain their dominance over conquered territories.

Overall, the Gunpowder Empires were able to conquer other empires and expand their territories due to their advanced military technology, centralized government structures, and abundant economic resources. These factors allowed them to gain a significant military advantage over their opponents and maintain control over vast territories.

Explanation:

In a four-way stop, if two cars arrive at the intersection at the same time, the general rule is that the car on the right has the right of way.

This means that the driver on the right can proceed through the intersection first, while the driver on the left must yield and wait until it is safe to enter the intersection.

If both drivers arrive at the same time and are positioned opposite each other (i.e., facing each other), the driver going straight typically has the right of way over the driver making a left turn. However, if both drivers are turning left, they must yield to any vehicles approaching from the opposite direction before turning.

It's important to always be cautious and aware of other vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists when driving through intersections, even when you have the right of way. Yielding to others when necessary and using turn signals can help prevent accidents and keep everyone on the road safe.

To know more about four-way stop refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/27740891

#SPJ11

Cheating men were referred by black hawk to the people who started the war used to take away land.

The War's instigators or the military personnel were the fraudulent individuals. He had stated, that he was protecting his land and his people against what he called "cheating men," who were the military or the individuals who began the War. People were herded into camps after being evicted from their homes. They were compelled to march to several other regions after their homes were robbed and destroyed.

Black Hawk did not feel bad about rebelling because he was protecting his people and their land from what he termed "cheating men" who had forcibly taken the land they had known for thousands of years and forced them to move to places where they could not cultivate enough food.

Read more about black hawk on:

https://brainly.com/question/8768226

#SPJ4

Answer:

yam harvest

Explanation:

have good day

Answer:

The Fetu Afahye is a festival celebrated by the chiefs and peoples of Cape Coast in the Central region of Ghana. The festival is celebrated on the first Saturday in the month of September every year. The Fetu Afahye is celebrated annually by the Oguaa people of Cape Coast because in the past there was an outbreak of disease among the people that killed many. The people prayed to the gods to help them to get rid of the disease. Thus the festival is celebrated to keep the town clean and to prevent another epidemic befalling the people. your answer is A

Explanation:

PLEASE GIVE ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

The best answer is: The Truman Doctrine encouraged European countries to build a military to fight against communism.

Stalin was opposed to the Truman Doctrine because it was seen as a direct challenge to Soviet expansionism in Europe. The Truman Doctrine was a key component of American foreign policy during the early Cold War years, and it provided economic and military aid to European countries in order to help them resist the spread of communism. This aid was seen by Stalin as an attempt to build a military alliance against the Soviet Union, and as a threat to Soviet security interests in Europe. Therefore, Stalin was opposed to the Truman Doctrine because it encouraged European countries to build up their military capabilities to resist communism, which he saw as a direct challenge to Soviet interests in the region.

The statement that explains how the work of Dorothea Dix benefited U.S. society is: Dorothea Dix's advocacy for the mentally ill and prison reform led to improved conditions, increased awareness, and the establishment of state-run mental institutions in the United States.

Dorothea Dix was a social reformer in the 19th century who dedicated her life to advocating for the rights of the mentally ill and prisoners. Her work greatly benefited U.S. society through the following steps:

1. Investigation and documentation: Dix started by visiting jails and almshouses, where she documented the inhumane living conditions of mentally ill individuals and prisoners. She then presented her findings to the public and lawmakers.

2. Raising awareness: Through her presentations and publications, Dix raised public awareness of the terrible conditions faced by the mentally ill and prisoners, and she promoted the idea that they deserved better treatment and care.

3. Advocating for change: Dix lobbied state legislatures and the U.S. Congress to allocate funding for the establishment of state-run mental institutions. Her efforts led to the creation of more than 30 mental hospitals and other institutions for the mentally ill in various states.

4. Improving conditions: As a result of her advocacy, the living conditions and treatment of mentally ill individuals and prisoners improved significantly. The establishment of mental institutions provided more humane living conditions and proper medical care, reducing the suffering of those affected.

In summary, Dorothea Dix's work benefited U.S. society by improving the lives of mentally ill individuals and prisoners, raising public awareness, and promoting the establishment of state-run mental institutions for better treatment and care.

To know more about Dorothea Dix refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30264816#

#SPJ11

This is correct. According To The Creators Of Barney Wasn't Barney going to be a Blanket then a bear

"Barney & Friends" producers indicated that the character Barney was first introduced as a blanket entity, later transitioning into a bear. Sheryl Leach, the show's creator, intended to fabricate a figure that would pacify children similarly to a cozy coverlet.

Her original design for the protagonist involved an enchanted covering convert into a playful companion for youngsters; however, she restructured the idea and transformed it into a brown-haired, friendly bear named Barney.

Read more on Barney & Friends here: https://brainly.com/question/31160614

#SPJ1

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Public services become racially segregated

Charles Darwin is best known for his theory of evolution, which he first proposed in his book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, published in 1859.

Darwin's theory of evolution explains how species change over time through a process of natural selection. Darwin argued that new species arise when certain individuals in a population have characteristics that make them more likely to survive and reproduce, and that these characteristics are passed on to their offspring, while individuals without the favorable characteristics are less likely to survive and reproduce.

Over time, this process leads to the formation of new species. Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection has been the foundation of modern evolutionary biology and has helped explain the diversity of life on Earth.

To know more about Charles Darwin, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/27812304

#SPJ4

Nat Turner led a rebellion against white enslavers that led to harsher enslavement laws which influenced change in the nineteenth century. Option D is the correct answer.

In U.S. history in August 1831, the only effective, sustained slave rebellion was led by Nat Turner who was an enslaved Black American. he believed that he was called by God to deliver his people from slavery. It was the deadliest slave revolt in U.S. history because the rebels killed between 55 and 65 White people.

His action set off a new wave of oppressive legislation prohibiting the education, movement, and assembly of slaves until the American Civil War. and Turner’s revolt destroyed the white Southern myth that slaves were actually happy with their lives or too obedient to undertake a violent rebellion.

Tom learn more about Nat Turner:

https://brainly.com/question/31163327

#SPJ4