Answer: The Democratic Republic of Vietnam was established following the August Revolution of 1945. A new legal system was gradually formed alongside the government in order to strengthen the government and social management. The reality of the legal system is secured and brought into play on this basis.
Explanation: Hope that helps
Financial support specialists help with
planning retirement in what way?
A. they inform an individual of what job to apply for
B. they inform an individual of the current sales on
products to buy
C. they inform the individual of investment
opportunities in stocks and bonds
D. they inform the individual of current social security
and medicare trends
(Help pls )
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
A Financial support specialist's job is to help you hopefully not go bankrupt after retirement. This includes helping you know what's the best likely option to invest in and what will benefit you.
can someone help me with this question please
Answer:
Law enforcement
courts
corrections
(i think its the 2nd one)
Texas law also requires children of certain ages, weights and heights to
Answer:
Texas law requires all children younger than 8 years old, unless taller than 4'9”, to be in the appropriate child safety seat system.
Texas law requires all children younger than 8 years old, unless taller than 4'9”, to be in the appropriate child safety seat system.
What is a law?In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts. There are two realms that make up the application of the law. Public law, which includes criminal law, administrative law,
In accordance with Texas law, all children under the age of eight must sit in a child safety seat unless they are taller than 4 feet 9 inches. Older kids who have outgrown a booster seat need to be belted in.
Therefore, By the law, it requires a child safety seat whenever they ride in a vehicle.
Learn more about the law here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ2
Larry is told by Moe that Curly stole his prized business law book from his car. The next day Larry confronts Curly and slaps him repeatedly for stealing his book. Curly had Larry arrested for slapping him. Larry sues Curly for damages in the amount of the book and for maliciously having him arrested. Claiming that he lied, Curly sues Moe for defamation. The lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book involves which of the following?
a. Public law.
b. Private law.
c. Administrative law.
d. Both public and private law.
Answer:
i think its D
Explanation:
Both public and private law as the lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book. Hence, option D is correct.
What is lawsuit?A lawsuit is a civil legal proceeding in which one party files a claim against another the defendant, and the court makes the final decision.
Depending on the remedy sought and the jurisdiction where the plaintiff filed the complaint, a lawsuit filed in court to seek relief from or a remedy for a claimed injury may be tried by a court of law or a court of equity.
A lawsuit typically involves issues like breach of contract, financial difficulties, bodily harm, or property damage. The purpose of a lawsuit is for the plaintiff to demand that the defendant make amends for the wrongdoing or pay damages.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about lawsuit, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15028192
#SPJ2
What does it mean to “establish the principle”?
Answer: establish a principle (=make it accepted)Establish the principle that when your office door is shut you must not be disturbed. lay down a principle (=describe a principle and make it accepted)The report lays down general principles for the teaching of English.
do police officers discriminate against minorities
Courts of general jurisdiction can grant a new trial on review of a case from a court of limited jurisdiction. What is this known as?
1. Implicit bias
2. Writ of certiorari
3. Nolle prosequi
4. Trial de novo process
Answer:
What is 4. Trial de novo process
Explanation:
De novo review occurs when a court decides an issue without deference to a previous court's decision. Trial de novo occurs when a court decides all issues in a case, as if the case was being heard for the first time. For a recent consideration of the use of de novo review, see McLane Co.
Have a happy day <3MissHawaii
What evidence demonstrates that Canada has succeeded in fostering
multicultural acceptance?
Answer:
In Canada there are many examples of multiculturalism. For example, Canada lets in refugees and immigrants and does not care about their race, religion, or culture.
6.
Class B fires use the following as fuel:
a.
wood, paper and cloth.
Ο Ο Ο
b.
magnesium, sodium and zinc.
o close
C.
grease, gas and oily
up
Answer:
option a is the correct option
Homicide makes up % of all crimes known to law enforcement.
Answer:
75%
Explanation:
g
List the qualifications of the president
Answer:
Requirements to Hold Office
According to Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the president must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, be at least 35 years old, and have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.
Explanation:
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
When making ethical decisions on behalf of your employer, should you consider the impact on others outside your employer? If so, who and why?
Please help me
In a situation in which I have to make ethical decisions on behalf of my employer, I should consider the impact of the people who are involved because my ethical behavior would be involved despite being on behalf of my employer.
Ethics is a term to refer to a subdiscipline of philosophy that focuses on the study of human behavior, its relationship with:
The notions of right and wrongThe moral preceptsDutyThe happinessThe common welfareAccording to the above, in a situation in which I must make an ethical decision on behalf of my boss, I must consider the impact that it will have on other people because my ethical actions will influence my decision. For example:
If my boss tells me that I should fire a co-worker because the company has lowered its profits, surely he considers that this is an ethical act for his benefit and his interests.However, I know that my partner depends on the salary he earns in the company and that he and his family would be affected by this decision. Then I could not fire him because he would be doing him a bad thing.Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/2630782
Which courts have jurisdiction over felony offenses, which are serious crimes that may result in a sentence of a year or more in prison?
Appellate courts
Courts of general jurisdiction
State courts of limited jurisdiction
Specialized courts
Annswer:
Explanation:
11. Although he knew he was guilty of the crime, the mobster said he wouldn't answer questions
about it on the stand. Which amendment protected him?
a. 4th amendment
b. 5th amendment
6th amendment
d. 7th amendment
Answer:
5th amendment
Explanation:
The 5th amendment goes as follows "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Answer:
5th
Explanation:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger..."
5th Amedment, U.S Constitution
Bacically the constitution allows you to not answer the police officer if he asks you what happened, it is similar to Meranda Rights
Explain the premise of unstructured socializing with peers and it's link to antisocial behavior and substance use among adolescents?
Answer:
Juvenile delinquency refers to antisocial or illegal behavior by children or adolescents.
Explanation:
The "stand your ground" doctrine originated in which state?
O a. Illinois
O b. Colorado
O c. Texas
O d. Florida
Answer:
Florida
Explanation:
Normally, a citizen has a duty to retreat when confronted with what they perceive to be deadly force.
Explain accident as an exempting circumstance. Give an example.
Answer:
EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCE • Accident presupposes lack of intention to commit wrong done. (refers to purely accidental case)--person performing a lawful act must do so with DUE CARE, WITHOUT FAULT OR NEGLIGENT. V. UNDER THE COMPULSION OF IRRESISTIBLE FORCE • ELEMENTS: 1.
Should women be allowed free tampons and pads due to to such items are a necessity?
Answer:
Yes please.
Explanation:
Mensturation isn't a choice.
7. When an officer has a reasonable basis for the belief that a person should be searched or
arrested, it is called
A a warrant
B an affidavit
C probable cause
D search and seize.
Answer:
C. PROBABLE CAUSE
Explanation:
Probable cause exists when an officer has a reasonable basis for the belief that a person should be searched or arrested.
to answer the question.
Answer:
Where's the question?........
Why are prosecutors and defense attorneys seen as legal adversaries?
The defense and the prosecution are not seen as legal adversaries.
The defense attorney is responsible for arguing against the police’s procedural steps used to charge their client.
The prosecutor and the defense attorney are both responsible for arguing against the judge’s case.
The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the state’s evidence against the accused, and the defense attorney is responsible for arguing against the state’s case.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the state's evidence against the accused, and the defense attorney is responsible for arguing against the state's case
What is the issue facing indigent criminal defendants in Luzerne County?
The public defender’s office is arguing against the Gideon v. Wainright decision.
The protections afforded to the indigent criminal defendants under the Fourth Amendment are being violated by the police.
The county attorney in Luzerne is refusing to plea bargain with the public defender’s office.
The overburdened public defender’s office is turning away clients.
here according to me option B is correct.
hope this answer helps you dear...take care and may u have a great day ahead!
The protections afforded to indigent criminal defendants under the Fourth Amendment are being violated by the police is the issue facing indigent criminal defendants in Luzerne County. Hence, option B is correct.
What is defendants?A person or thing that is the subject of a lawsuit or criminal investigation; if the defendant is found not guilty by the jury, one who is being sued.
A person who is being sued or who has been accused of a crime is a defendant. A defendant may be someone who has been accused of driving under the influence.
In legal proceedings, a defendant is a person or entity who is either the party who is being sued for some type of civil relief in a civil case or the party who is being prosecuted for a crime in a criminal case.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more information about defendants, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14167307
#SPJ2
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain why the red Mustang should be given right-of-way at this
intersection.
Your answer should be → I have to yield to the red mustang because it is on my right.
Why would the city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes within city limits?
The city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes because:
The city council is said to be trying to stop having litigation that is brought by or as a result of visitors and residents visit. This is based on the fact that if or when they injured themselves on the town's rustic sidewalks and trails when they are wearing high-heeled shoes.
What is an ordinance?An ordinance is known to be passed due to any case of an emergency and it is one that needs a two-thirds vote of the whole governing body for passage.
The city did pass the ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes to avoid any form of litigation.
Learn more about California from
https://brainly.com/question/26015261
alguien y vio el * JUEGO DEL CALAMAR * es muy bacana se las recomiendo esta en NEFLITX me la estoy viendo por parte aveses es muy violento , el juego del calamar se trata de :
En la trama, un grupo de 456 personas, desesperadas y ahogadas en deudas, son atraídas para participar en un juego sangriento de supervivencia en el que tienen la oportunidad de ganar cerca de US$39 millones si logran pasar seis desafíos.
veansela se las recomiendo :)
es muy buena
Answer:
Explanation:
Sehhh es muy buenaa, su trama siento que es original.
Which of the following individuals may be required to undergo HIV testing? a) Employees of a small business with limited health insurance resources b) A technician at an HIV testing lab c) A convicted sex offender d) A nurse applying for a job at a hospital
Answer:
The answer is B because they are exposed to HIV all the time.
Explanation:
How much should intent matter in determining the seriousness of a crime? Should an attempted larceny carry a shorter sentence than a completed theft? Should attempted murder carry a shorter sentence than a completed murder? Explain your answer.
The intent of the perpetrator is often considered an important factor in determining the seriousness of a crime and the appropriate sentence. However, the extent to which intent should be taken into account can be a complex and nuanced issue.
What is the seriousness of a crime?In general, the more premeditated and intentional a crime is, the more serious it is considered to be. For example, attempted murder may be considered less serious than completed murder, because the perpetrator did not succeed in taking a life.
However, it's important to note that attempted crimes can still have severe consequences and can cause significant harm to the victim. For example, an attempted murder can still cause serious physical injuries to the victim, and an attempted larceny can still cause fear, anxiety and financial loss for the victim.
Therefore, it's important that the intent of the perpetrator be weighed alongside the actual harm caused to the victim in determining the seriousness of the crime and the appropriate sentence.
Learn more about crime from
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Which source would be the MOST biased when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency, compared to past presidents?
Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members
Other biased sources include the following:
Political party members of the President,Previous schools the current President attended,Family of the current President The political party the President belonged to,The special assistants to the current President, etc.
The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20646239
What color indicates you are in a work area?