Answer:
With a camera
Explanation:
Br uh how else
Why would TSU name their Public Affairs School after Barbara Jordan?
Answer:
under
Explanation:
Barbara Charline Jordan was an American lawyer, educator and politician who was a leader in the Civil Rights Movement. A Democrat, she was the first African American elected to the Texas Senate after Reconstruction and the first Southern African-American woman elected to the United States House of Representatives.
what is the reason to regulate minimum wage?
Answer:
So the prices will not get too high. The higher the minimum wage, the higher the price is for the product the company is selling.
Explanation:
So if Wendy's minumun wage is $7.50 an hour, and a burger is 4.00. If you raise the wage to $15, the burger price will go up
In what situations would a case to be heard in federal court? 
Explanation:
bankruptcy cases would be heard in a federal court
LGBT teens are more likely to be disciplined than straights for the same offense . True False
Answer:
I'm not 100% sure but I think its true
Answer:
true
Explanation:
even if its not fair, im pretty sure this is true
Adam did have a will prepared shortly before he died. The property that is transferred according to adams will is known as the?
What did John Adams mean when he said that the United States was “a nation of laws and not men”? Write two or three sentences for your answer.
Answer:
What he meant was that we are a nation of laws that means we have laws to fallow not men. This was keeping from people Ruling and being powerful.
Explanation:
The cases of New Jersey v. T.L.O and Vernonia School District v. Acton both involved which topic?
Freedom of speech
Freedom of the press
Search and seizure
Cruel and unusual punishment
The topic that the cases of New Jersey v. T.L.O and Vernonia School District v. Acton both involve was C. Search and seizure.
What is a search and seizure investigation?A search and seizure investigation is an examination of a person's home, vehicle, or business for evidence of a crime.
In New Jersey v. T.L.O, the Supreme Court established "the standard of reasonableness for searches of students in a school environment.
In Vernonia School District v. Acton, the court established that random drug testing did not violate the constitutionally guaranteed privacy.
Thus, the topic that the cases of New Jersey v. T.L.O and Vernonia School District v. Acton both involve was C. Search and seizure.
Learn more about the authority of law enforcement officers at https://brainly.com/question/10902423
#SPJ2
Answer: rights of students
sExplanation:
Need assignment in grad point. I need unit 2 Lab questions and answers
UNIT THREE: Forensic Science Lab Questions
HS: Forensic Science I (E)(AL)
Answer:
hmmmm.... okay so I should try this too see if im.right but I'm trying to do law school
Which of the following tests of insanity did the attorneys for Lorena Bobbitt, who sliced
off her husband's penis with a kitchen knife while he was sleeping, successfully employ
in a 1994 Virginia trial?
Answer:
I'm sorry WHAT, I'm randomly scrolling through and I saw this and-
Explanation:
W H A T
Tom attacked Kathy in the parking lot of a bar. He knocked her to the ground and stole her purse, breaking her arm in the process. Kathy works as a data input specialist at a bank and missed eight weeks of work due to her injury. Discuss how her case could be handled under both the criminal and civil law systems, including possible remedies available under each system.
Answer and Explanation:
Under criminal and civil law, Kathy would be entitled to compensation for lost wages and expenses for looking after her broken arm, while Tom should be penalized with incarceration and/or fines.
This would happen because the criminal understands Tom's actions as a crime and calls Tom a criminal who must be punished and held responsible for his actions. Civil law, on the other hand, puts Kathy in the position of a victim who has been harmed by criminal acts. All Kathy's physical and economic injuries must be compensated.
Lab Questions UNIT SEVEN: DNA Evidence
Need answers grad point
HS: Forensic Science I (E)(AL)
Answer:
I never understood this one
What is your opinion or belief as to the Electoral College vote process for the Presidential Elections?
in the Lorri Vallow case what tactic should Mark Means use to "prove" she is innocent
Answer:
that she is a murder and she needs to go to jail for life
Explanation:
You overhear your friend complaining that he's upset there's no way to change the constitution
Go live in L'Manburg.
Nick is writing an article for his school’s website about the increasing interest in school plays. Which of the following elements would help readers visually understand the rise in the number of students who have participated in the school's plays in the last five years?
A.
formatting: headings to separate parts of the article
B.
multimedia: video clip of student actors rehearsing
C.
graphics: graph showing student involvement in the plays
D.
graphics: table listing the plays from the last five years
i give brainlest answer rigth fro brainlest
Answer:
C.) Graphics: graph showing students involvement in the plays.
1. As manager of a foreign subsidiary, I have recently discovered my chief of operations has authorized a very convoluted accounting system, most likely to hide many costs that go into his pocket. Right now, I have no real proof, but rumors are circulating to that effect as well. This chief, however, has close ties to officials in the government who can make or break my company in this country. What do can I do?
What does the state bank of pakistan act 1956 mantain that onlystate bank.Can lawfully issue bearer notes and bills of exchange payable on demand?What doea this tells about nature of paper currency that we use?
For a former convict, the lifetime effects of incarceration can negatively impact _____.
job availability
credit worthiness
lifetime earnings
marriage
THIS IS MULTIPLE CHOICE
I'm pretty sure its job availability and lifetime earnings because it cant be credit worthiness because being in prison doesn't affect that
Using materials covered in class today, answer how the legislative process works.
The materials are the docs below.
Answer:
First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority, the bill moves to the Senate.
Throughout the year, Supreme Court justices review cases that have been appealed to the Court. When a session begins, the justices select a handful of cases to more fully review and decide. For each selected case, lawyers for both parties are allowed to make public arguments in an attempt to sway the justices and address their questions. The justices then deliberate and argue the facts of the case. They produce opinions, which can include majority, dissenting, and concurring opinions. The justices vote on which opinion they support, and the opinion with the most votes becomes the final verdict.
Which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process?
A. The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it.
B. Justices do not vote on particular opinions, but rather on the final ruling.
C. Lawyers are not allowed to attempt to influence the justice's opinions in any way.
D. Only appellate court judges are charged with writing dissenting opinions.
The statement that best summarizes the inaccuracies contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process is that the Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it. Hence, Option A is correct.
What is the Supreme Court?The court, which is the highest court in the United States, is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases and the cases that are over state courts are looked after by the Supreme Court.
Any opinion, whether it is of the majority, dissenting or the final court decision, is expressed after hearing arguments from both the parties. They constitute the ruling of the Supreme Court over the case.
According to the given paragraph The Supreme Court firstly reaches a decision and then hears the parts, which is wrong. It is the duty of the Supreme court to hear any case that is appealed to it.
Therefore, Option A: The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it is correct.
Learn more about Supreme court from here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ2
Assume Plaintiff (P) is a Georgia resident. While driving through Birmingham, Alabama, P is involved in an accident with D, an Alabama resident. P alleges more than $75,000 in personal and property injuries. Does a federal court in Georgia have subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute based on the diversity of citizenship of the parties
Answer:
75,000
Explanation:
i belive this correct
What are two aspects of legal evidence? Evidence that is legally admissible in court Evidence that proves the guilt of a suspect Evidence that proves a crime was committed Evidence that is legally obtained and collected
Direct and circumstantial evidence are the two categories of evidence. The People assert that there is circumstantial proof of the defendant's guilt in this instance.
What are the types of evidence ?Let me describe the distinctions between direct and circumstantial evidence.
Direct evidence is proof of a fact that is based on the firsthand experience or observation of the witness.
Direct evidence may be used to prove a person's guilt of a charged offense if, taken alone, it convinces a jury that the individual is guilty of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
A person may properly deduce the existence or nonexistence of another fact from circumstantial evidence, which is direct evidence of a fact. Circumstantial evidence may be used to establish a person's guilt of an alleged crime,if the evidence raises a fair inference of guilt even though it does not prove guilt explicitly.
Let me give you an illustration of how direct evidence and circumstantial evidence vary.
Learn more about Evidence here
https://brainly.com/question/10214827
#SPJ5
Describe what an officer must demonstrate to justify an emergency search.
Answer:
Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself
Explanation:
Niki donated 4 5/8 pounds of beans to the food drive and Annie donated 3 2/3 pounds of beans to the food drive. Together, how much food did they donate?
Answer: 8⁷/₂₄ pounds of beans.
Explanation:
First convert both fractions to improper fractions.
4 ⁵/₈ = 37/8
3²/₃ = 11/3
Find the lowest common multiple of 3 and 8 which is 24.
Use 24 as the denominator and add the fractions by multiplying the numerator by the result you get from dividing 24 by the denominator:
[tex]= \frac{111 + 88}{24} \\\\= \frac{199}{24} \\\\= 8\frac{7}{24} pounds of beans[/tex]
pwease pick me as brainliset :((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
During the 1950s, psychology and social psychological research played key roles in the new focus on prisoner's health and well-being. This resulted in more freedom for those in prison facilities. At the same time, overcrowding was an ongoing problem. In the 1960s and 1970s, the new freedoms and the overcrowding led to _____.
an increase in the number of clergy hired to work in correctional institutions
prison riots and increased interpersonal violence
an increase in products and services made by the incarcerated
an increase in the use of solitary confinement
Answer: prison riots and increased interpersonal violence
Explanation:
With prisoners having more freedom in prisons, they regularly came into contact with other prisoners. As the prisons became overcrowded, contact with other prisoners increased and so did tensions.
These tensions boiled over into interpersonal violence and conflict which escalated sometimes into full blown riots such as the Attica Prison riot of 1971 and the Ohio State Penitentiary riot in 1968.
For 100 points, what are Wilbur Soot's rules, and, who is LUNA!?
Answer:
sorry i do not know number one.
Brandon Luna
He has handled over 5000 criminal cases as a former Deputy District Attorney and now offers his experience to you as a Criminal Defense Attorney. He started Luna Law to help good people who have made a mistake navigate through the confusing and often scary criminal justice system.
Answer:
Rule #1: N0 B00mers
Rule #2: N0 Z00mers
Rule #3: N0 Weebs (under the penalty 0f death) ((I'm l00king at y0u Phil))
Rule #4: N0 Marvel Stans
Rule #5: Stan L00na
Rule #6: N0 K-P0p
Rule #7: (bbh) N0 My Little P0ny, Friendship Is F--K
Rule #8: N0 Vide0s I've Already Seen Bef0re
Rule #9: Staged Vide0s Are S--T
Rule #10: Ign0re rule number 5
Rule #11: L0ud Are S0METIMES Funny
Rule #12: Respect All Auth0rity, Unless They Challenge Y0ur Rights. If S0, Break A Windshield (That Was a J0ke for Legal Purp0ses)
I don't know #2 :')
2. According to demographer Gates (2011)what percent of adults of 18 and older identify as LGBT ?
7.1 percent, a new record, represents the percentage of U.S. adults who self-identify as homosexual, gay, bisexual, transgender, or as someone who is not heterosexual. This is double the number from 2011 when Gallup first took this measurement.
What's the meaning of the rainbow flag?The LGBT social movements and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) pride are symbolized by the rainbow flag. The colors, which are sometimes referred to as the gay pride flag or LGBT pride flag, represent the diversity of the LGBT population as well as the range of sexual orientations and gender identities.
The proportion of adults who identify as LGBT has been largely stable among traditionalists, baby boomers, and members of Generation X since Gallup started tracking LGBT identification in 2011. The proportion of millennials has also increased slightly, from 5.8% in 2011 (when some members of the generation had not yet reached the age of 18) to 7.8% in 2017 and 10.5 percent now.
Since 2017, when just the youngest members of Generation Z—those born between 1997 and 1999—had reached adulthood, the percentage of that generation who identify as LGBT has nearly doubled. 10.5 percent of the small portion of the generation who were adults at the time identified as LGBT.
Learn more about the LGBT Rainbow flag here:
https://brainly.com/question/9332926
#SPJ2
What are the central assumptions of biological theories of crime? How do such theories differ from other perspectives that attempt to explain the same phenomena?
Answer:
Human behavior is passed on generation to generation. Even though many behaviors are instinctive and are hereditary. Biology and the social environment play a may give a reason in th cause of the crime.
Explanation:
How is a conventional life estate created?
Kenneth is an employee at ups and is required to be able to lift up to 50lbs one day he was playing basketball with his friends and injured his back he has been experiencing severe back pain at work and has not been able to lift anything while at work so ups terminated him Did the UPS act legally explain?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
No, the UPS employer is not acting legally by firing Kenneth. As long as an employer is able to fulfill all of the requirements of the job then they are protected and cannot legally be fired without proper reason for termination. If the employee gets injured on the job they are eligible for filling a workers' compensation claim. If an employer fires an employee for any on the job related injury then they are doing so illegally and can be sued by the employee for doing so.