historical daily rainfall data for a city indicates the following: what is the probability that it will rain on both friday and saturday?

(-2, 3) are the coordinates of point D of parallelogram.

A(-7,1), B(-3, -6), C(2, -4)

Let the 4th point D = (x , y)

In a parallelogram, diagonals bisect each other.

midpoint of BD = midpoint of AC

If two points are (x₁ , y₁) and (x₂,y₂)

then midpoint = {(x₁+x₂)/2 , (y₁+y₂)/2}

midpoint of AC = {(-7 + 2)/2 , (1-4)/2}

= {-5/2 , -3/2}

midpoint of BD = {(-3 + x)/2 , (-6 + y)/2}

Now,

midpoint of BD = midpoint of AC

{-5/2 , -3/2} =  {(-3 + x)/2 , (-6 + y)/2}

Comparing both sides

(-3 + x)/2 = -5/2

-3+x=-5

x=-2

taking y -coordinate

(-6+ y)/2 = -3/2

-6 + y = -3

y = 3

Point D (x , y) = (-2, 3)

Hence,  (-2, 3) are the coordinates of point D of parallelogram.

To learn more on Parallelogram click:

https://brainly.com/question/26955263

#SPJ1

Based on the given percentiles, we can determine that the value of X represents the resting heart rate at the 25th percentile. To estimate the value of X, we can use the z-score formula for a normal distribution. The z-score corresponding to the 25th percentile is approximately -0.674.

The formula for the z-score is: (X - mean) / standard deviation. We have the mean (70 bpm) and the z-score (-0.674), but we need to estimate the standard deviation. To do this, we can use the 50th and 75th percentiles. The z-score for the 50th percentile is 0, so the mean equals the 50th percentile value (70 bpm). The z-score for the 75th percentile is 0.674, so we can set up the equation:

(80 - 70) / standard deviation = 0.674

10 / standard deviation = 0.674

Standard deviation ≈ 10 / 0.674 ≈ 14.8 bpm

Now we can solve for X:

-0.674 = (X - 70) / 14.8

-0.674 * 14.8 ≈ X - 70

-9.9 ≈ X - 70

X ≈ 60.1

Rounding to the nearest whole number, the value of X is approximately 60 bpm.

To learn more about standard deviation visit;

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

If Vanessa can change a tire in 20 minutes, she can change 3 tires in an hour. To change 8 tires per day, she would need to work for 2 hours and 40 minutes

To answer your question, we need to know the total amount of money Eric is willing to spend on Vanessa's work per day. Let's assume that Eric has a budget of $78 (8 hours x $9.75 per hour) for Vanessa's work per day.

If we know how long it takes Vanessa to change a tire, we can calculate how many tires she can change in an hour and then determine how many hours she should work per day.

For example, if Vanessa can change a tire in 20 minutes, she can change 3 tires in an hour. To change 8 tires per day, she would need to work for 2 hours and 40 minutes (8 tires / 3 tires per hour = 2.67 hours or 160 minutes).

Therefore, Eric should have Vanessa work for 2 hours and 40 minutes per day to change 8 tires, given that he is paying her $9.75 per hour. However, this calculation may vary depending on Vanessa's efficiency and the specific needs of Eric's business.

To determine the number of hours per day Vanessa should work changing tires, you need to consider a few factors, such as the number of tires that need to be changed daily, Vanessa's efficiency in changing tires, and the desired daily wage for Vanessa.

Step 1: Determine the number of tires that need to be changed daily.

Step 2: Determine how many tires Vanessa can change per hour.

Step 3: Divide the total number of tires that need to be changed daily by the number of tires Vanessa can change per hour. This will give you the number of hours Vanessa needs to work each day.

Example: If there are 20 tires that need to be changed daily and Vanessa can change 4 tires per hour, then she should work for 5 hours per day (20 tires ÷ 4 tires/hour = 5 hours).

Please note that this example assumes a constant workload and efficiency level. The actual hours needed may vary depending on other factors such as breaks, efficiency changes, and workload fluctuations.

Learn more about workload at: brainly.com/question/28880047

#SPJ11

Answer: Dome Fuji, in Antarctica, is the coldest place in the world with a record low of –92 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a box and whisker plot, the third quartile represents C. the middle data point of the upper half of the data set.

The third quartile represents the median of the data points to the right of the median of the box and whisker plot.

The third quartile is also described as the upper quartile, showing the value under which 75% of data points are found when arranged in increasing order.

Thus, the correct option for the third quartile is C.

Learn more about the third quartile at https://brainly.com/question/28169373.

#SPJ1

It will be impossible to know if the photographer has enough space left on her memory card without knowing the capacity of the card and the size of the planned photos for session D.

Main answer:

It is impossible to determine if the photographer has enough space left on her memory card without knowing the capacity of the card and the size of the planned photos for session D.

We must know capacity of the card and the size of the planned photos for session D. If combined size of the planned photos for session B and C is less than remaining space on the card after accounting for the 3.4 megabytes needed for session D, then, the photographer would have enough space.

But if combined size of the planned photos for session B and C is greater than the remaining space on the card after accounting for the 3.4 megabytes needed for session D, then, the photographer would not have enough space.

Read more about memory card

brainly.com/question/31393928

#SPJ1

The sum of the series [tex]\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{3}{7^{k} }[/tex]  is 7/2. Therefore, the correct answer is option C. The sum of a geometric series can be found only if the ratio is between -1 and 1.

To find the sum of the series [tex]\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{3}{7^{k} }[/tex], we can use the formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series, which is [tex]\frac{a}{1-r}[/tex], where a is the first term and r is the common ratio.

In this case, the first term is [tex]\frac{3}{7^0}=3[/tex] and the common ratio is [tex]\frac{1}{7}[/tex]. Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

[tex]\frac{3}{1-\frac{1}{7}}=\frac{3}{\frac{6}{7}}=\frac{7}{2}[/tex]

Therefore, the sum of the series is c. 7/2. Alternatively, we can also find the sum of the series by adding up the terms:

[tex]\frac{3}{1}+\frac{3}{7}+\frac{3}{49}+\frac{3}{343}+...\approx 4.5[/tex]

This method involves adding up an infinite number of terms, so it may not always be practical or accurate. Using the formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series is a more efficient and reliable method. Therefore, the correct answer is option C.

To know more about geometric series refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31472659#

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

Find the sum of the series:

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{3}{7^{k} }[/tex]

a. 7/3

b. 21/2

c. 7/2

d. 21/4

e. 7

Each irrational number with the number line:

a) First number line = 2.1829391321..

b) Second number line = 2.364125..

c) Third number line = 2.18112..

d) Fourth number line = 2.1823912..

a) Here, we can obseve that between 2.182 and 2.183 a number line is divided into 10 equal segments.

So, each unit length represents (2.183 - 2.182) / 10 = 0.0001 unit

The required irrational number (represented by red dot) lie between 2.1829 and 2.183.

So, the  irrational number would be 2.1829391321..

b) Here, we can obseve that between 2 and 3 a number line is divided into 10 equal segments.

So, each unit length represents (3 - 2) / 10 = 0.1 unit

The required irrational number (represented by red dot) lie between 2.3 and 2.4

So, the irrational number would be 2.364125..

c) Here, we can obseve that between 2.11 and 2.21 a number line is divided into 10 equal segments.

So, each unit length represents (2.21 - 2.11) / 10 = 0.01 unit

The required irrational number (represented by red dot) lie between 2.18 and 2.19

So, the irrational number would be 2.18112..

d) Here, we can obseve that between 2.18 and 2.19 a number line is divided into 10 equal segments.

So, each unit length represents (2.19 - 2.18) / 10 = 0.001 unit

The required irrational number (represented by red dot) lie between 2.182 and 2.183

So, the irrational number would be 2.1823912..

Learn more about an  irrational number here:

https://brainly.com/question/17450097

#SPJ1

Answer:

To prove that ABCD is a parallelogram, we need to show that opposite sides are parallel. We can do this by calculating the slopes of each side and showing that they are equal.

The slope of a line passing through two points (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) is given by:

slope = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

Using this formula, we can calculate the slopes of AB, BC, CD, and DA as follows:

Slope of AB:

slope_AB = (3 - 0) / (1 - 0) = 3

Slope of BC:

slope_BC = (4 - 3) / (0 - 1) = -1

Slope of CD:

slope_CD = (1 - 4) / (-1 - 0) = 3

Slope of DA:

slope_DA = (0 - 1) / (0 - (-1)) = 1

We can see that the slopes of AB and CD are equal, and the slopes of BC and DA are equal. Therefore, opposite sides of ABCD have equal slopes, which means they are parallel.

Hence, ABCD is a parallelogram.

Step-by-step explanation:

You would be paying $3000 per year for the health insurance plan.

If the premium for the health insurance plan is $125 per paycheck, and you get paid every two weeks, then the cost of the insurance per month is:

2 paychecks x $125 per paycheck = $250 per month

To find the cost per year, we need to multiply the monthly cost by 12:

$250 per month x 12 months = $3,000 per year

hence, you would be paying $3000 per year for the health insurance plan.

Learn more about cost https://brainly.com/question/29509552

#SPJ1

To compute dy/dx using the chain rule, we first need to find du/dx using the power rule.

du/dx = d/dx(x-x^3) = 1 - 3x^2

Next, we can use the chain rule to find dy/dx:

dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx

dy/du = 1/7 - 7/u^2

So,

dy/dx = (1/7 - 7/u^2) * (1 - 3x^2)

Substituting u = x - x^3, we get:

dy/dx = (1/7 - 7/(x-x^3)^2) * (1 - 3x^2)

Thus, the answer in terms of x only is:

dy/dx = (1/7 - 7/(x-x^3)^2) * (1 - 3x^2)

Let's compute dy/dx using the chain rule. Given the function y = u/7 + 7/u, where u = x - x^3, we will first differentiate y with respect to u, then differentiate u with respect to x, and finally multiply the two results together using the chain rule.

Here are the steps:

1. Differentiate y with respect to u:
dy/du = (1/7) - (7/u^2)

2. Differentiate u with respect to x:
du/dx = 1 - 3x^2

3. Apply the chain rule:
dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx

Now substitute the expressions we found in steps 1 and 2 into the chain rule formula:

dy/dx = [(1/7) - (7/u^2)] * (1 - 3x^2)

Since we need the answer in terms of x only, substitute the expression for u (x - x^3) back into the equation:

dy/dx = [(1/7) - (7/(x - x^3)^2)] * (1 - 3x^2)

This is the final expression for dy/dx using the chain rule in terms of x only.

Learn more about differentiating here:- brainly.com/question/31495179

#SPJ11

The ratio that is equivalent to 4:6 is 40:60

A ratio is a mathematical expression of comparing two similar or different quantities by division.

For examples if the ratio of cow to sheep In a farm is 3: 4, this means that for 3 cows in the farm there will be 4 sheeps

Equivalent ratios are the ratios that are the same when we compare them. Examples of equivalent ratios are 4:5 and 8 :10.

The equivalent of 4:6 can also be 2:3 but in the options we don't have that, another equivalent can be obtained by multiplying 10 to both sides

=4×10: 6× 10

= 40:60

therefore the equivalent of the ratio 4:6 is 40:60

learn more about equivalent ratio from

https://brainly.com/question/2328454

#SPJ1

Rounding to two decimal places, we get ∂z/∂s = 42.00 as answer.

Using Chain Rule, we have:

∂z/∂s = (∂z/∂x) * (∂x/∂s) + (∂z/∂y) * (∂y/∂s)

∂z/∂x = -y*cos(x), and ∂z/∂y = sin(x)

∂x/∂s = ne*cos(s), and ∂y/∂s = 42

Substituting these values, we get:

∂z/∂s = (-ycos(x)) * (necos(s)) + (sin(x)) * (42)

At s=0, x = ne*sin(s) = 0 and y = 152, so:

∂z/∂s = (-152cos(0)) * (necos(0)) + (sin(0)) * (42) = 42

To know more about Chain Rule refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30117847

#SPJ11

An expression that represent the inverse of the matrix below include the following: D. [tex]\frac{1}{5} \left[\begin{array}{ccc}2&-3\\1&1\end{array}\right][/tex]

In Mathematics, an inverse function simply refers to a type of function that is obtained by reversing the mathematical operation in a given function (f(x)).

In this exercise, you are required to determine the inverse of the matrix below. This ultimately implies that, we would determine the determinant of the matrix as follows;

Determinant of A = detA = (1 × 2) - (-1)(3)

Determinant of A = detA = 2 - (-3)

Determinant of A = detA = 2 + 3

Determinant of A = detA = 5 ≠ 0

Since the determinant of A is not equal to zero (detA ≠ 0), we can logically deduce that, the inverse of A (A⁻¹) exist;

Adj(A) = [tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}2&-3\\1&1\end{array}\right][/tex]

A⁻¹ = [tex]\frac{1}{detA}[/tex][Adj(A)]

A⁻¹ =     [tex]\frac{1}{5} \left[\begin{array}{ccc}2&-3\\1&1\end{array}\right][/tex]

Read more on inverse and matrix here: https://brainly.com/question/16575478

#SPJ1

The variance in the dependent variable can be explained by the variance in the independent variable 66.67%.

To find the variance in the dependent variable that can be explained by the variance in the independent variable, we need to first calculate the coefficient of determination (R-squared).

The R-squared value is a statistical measure that determines the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable that can be explained by the independent variable.
R-squared is calculated as the ratio of the explained variation (SSR) to the total variation (SST).

Therefore, we can calculate the R-squared as follows:
R-squared = SSR/SST = 24/36 = 0.67
This means that 67% of the variation in the dependent variable can be explained by the variation in the independent variable.
To find the variance in the dependent variable that can be explained by the variance in the independent variable, we need to multiply the R-squared value by the total variance in the dependent variable (SST).

Therefore, we can calculate the variance explained by the independent variable as follows:
Variance explained = R-squared * SST = 0.67 * 36 = 24.12
Therefore,

The variance in the dependent variable that can be explained by the variance in the independent variable is 24.12.

This means that the independent variable can explain 24.12 units of variation in the dependent variable, while the remaining 11.88 units of variation are due to other factors not accounted for by the independent variable.

For similar question on independent variable:

https://brainly.com/question/17034410

#SPJ11

The function of the vector field is f ( x , y , z ) = ( 1/2 )x² + (1/2)y² + (1/2)z²

Given data ,

Let the function be F = ∇f,

where F is the given vector field F(x, y, z) = xi + yj + zk, we need to find the components of the gradient of f, denoted as ∇f

Now , The gradient of f is given by ∇f = (∂f/∂x)i + (∂f/∂y)j + (∂f/∂z)k

Comparing the components of ∇f with the given components of F, we get the following equations

∂f/∂x = x

∂f/∂y = y

∂f/∂z = z

We can integrate each of these equations with respect to the respective variable to obtain f(x, y, z)

∫∂f/∂x dx = ∫x dx

f(x, y, z) = (1/2)x² + g(y, z)

∫∂f/∂y dy = ∫y dy

f(x, y, z) = ( 1/2 )x² + (1/2)y² + h(x, z)

∫∂f/∂z dz = ∫z dz

f(x, y, z) = ( 1/2 )x² + (1/2)y² + (1/2)z² + C

Now , the value of C is given by x = 0 , y = 0 and z = 0

So , C = 0

Hence , the function f(x, y, z) = ( 1/2 )x² + (1/2)y² + (1/2)z² is the desired function such that F = ∇f, and f(0, 0, 0) = 0

To learn more about vectors click :

https://brainly.com/question/11044032

#SPJ1

we can expect to receive approximately 3 phone calls during the 1.5-hour movie, on average.

The probability of your phone ringing during a 1.5-hour movie can be calculated using the Poisson distribution formula:

P(X = k) = (e^-λ * λ^k) / k!

Where X is the number of phone calls, λ is the average rate of calls per unit time (in this case, 2 calls per hour), and k is the number of calls during the 1.5-hour period.

So, for k = 0 (no calls), the probability is: P(X = 0) = (e^-2 * 2^0) / 0! = e^-2 ≈ 0.1353

Therefore, the probability that your phone rings at least once during the movie is: P(X ≥ 1) = 1 - P(X = 0) = 1 - e^-2 ≈ 0.8647

To calculate the expected number of calls during the movie, we use the formula: E(X) = λ * t

Where t is the duration of the period (1.5 hours in this case). So, the expected number of calls during the movie is: E(X) = 2 * 1.5 = 3

Therefore, we can expect to receive approximately 3 phone calls during the 1.5-hour movie, on average.

To know more about probability click here

brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

The solution to the boundary value problem is

y(x) = -(2 - 2e^3)e^3/(1 - e^3) + (2 - 2e^3)/(1 - e^3) * e^(3x).

The characteristic equation is r^2 - 3r = 0, which has roots r = 0 and r = 3. Thus, the general solution to the differential equation is y(x) = c1 + c2e^(3x).

Using the initial condition y(0) = 2 - 2e^3, we have y(0) = c1 + c2 = 2 - 2e^3.

Using the boundary condition y(1) = 0, we have y(1) = c1 + c2e^3 = 0.

We can solve for c1 and c2 by solving the system of equations:

c1 + c2 = 2 - 2e^3

c1 + c2e^3 = 0

Subtracting the second equation from the first, we get c2(1 - e^3) = 2 - 2e^3, which gives us c2 = (2 - 2e^3)/(1 - e^3).

Substituting c2 into the second equation, we get c1 = -c2e^3 = -(2 - 2e^3)e^3/(1 - e^3).

Thus, the solution to the boundary value problem is y(x) = -(2 - 2e^3)e^3/(1 - e^3) + (2 - 2e^3)/(1 - e^3) * e^(3x).

To know more about boundary value problems refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30332114

#SPJ11

The number of miles that Freya traveled in total is 320 miles.

Given that:

Bournemouth to Gloucester: v = 50 mph and t = 2.5 h

Gloucester to Anglesey: v = 65 mph and t = 3 h

We know that the speed formula

Speed = Distance/Time

The number of miles that Freya traveled in total is calculated as,

Distance = 50 x 2.5 + 65 x 3

Distance = 125 + 195

Distance = 320 miles

More about the speed link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/7359669

#SPJ1

Answer:

31.7925 [tex]in^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

V = 1/3[tex]\pi r^{2}[/tex]h

v = 1/3 (3.14)([tex]2.25^{2}[/tex])(6)    The radius is 1/2 of the diameter

v = 1/3 (3.14)(5.0625)(6)

v = [tex]\frac{95.3775}{3}[/tex]

v = 31.7925

Helping in the name of Jesus.

To predict a linear regression score, you first need to train a linear regression model using a set of training data.

Once the model is trained, you can use it to make predictions on new data points. The predicted score will be based on the linear relationship between the input variables and the target variable,

A higher regression score indicates a better fit, while a lower score indicates a poorer fit.

To predict a linear regression score, follow these steps:

1. Gather your data: Collect the data p

points (x, y) for the variable you want to predict (y) based on the input variable (x).

2. Calculate the means: Find the mean of the x values (x) and the mean of the y values (y).

3. Calculate the slope (b1): Use the formula b1 = Σ[(xi - x)(yi - y)]  Σ(xi - x)^2, where xi and yi are the individual data points, and x and y are the means of x and y, respectively.

4. Calculate the intercept (b0): Use the formula b0 = y - b1 * x, where y is the mean of the y values and x is the mean of the x values.

5. Form the linear equation: The linear equation will be in the form y = b0 + b1 * x, where y is the predicted value, x is the input variable, and b0 and b1 are the intercept and slope, respectively.

6. Predict the linear regression score: Use the linear equation to predict the value of y for any given value of x by plugging in the x value into the equation. The resulting y value is your predicted linear regression score.

To know more about linear regression scores:- https://brainly.com/question/30670065

#SPJ11

If the mean cost of new books is the same as the median cost of new books, then the distribution of book costs is symmetrically distributed.

This means that the data is evenly distributed around the mean and median, and there are an equal number of values on both sides of the central point. In a symmetric distribution, the mean and median are the same, and the data is evenly spread out around them.

A negatively skewed distribution would have a longer tail on the left side, indicating that the majority of the values are higher. A positively skewed distribution would have a longer tail on the right side, indicating that the majority of the values are lower.

A symmetric distribution, on the other hand, has no long tail on either side, and the majority of the values cluster around the central point. Therefore, the distribution of book costs is symmetrically distributed.

To know more about value click here

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

a. The probability that X is greater than 500 is approximately 0.368.

b. The conditional probability that X is greater than 1000 is approximately 0.368.

a. To compute Pr[X > 500), we use the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the exponential distribution, which is:

F(x) = 1 - e^(-x/B)

Plugging in B = 500 and x = 500, we get:

Pr[X > 500) = 1 - F(500) = 1 - (1 - e^(-500/500)) = e^(-1) ≈ 0.368

Therefore, the probability that X is greater than 500 is approximately 0.368.

b. To compute Pr[X > 1000 | X > 500), we use the definition of conditional probability:

Pr[X > 1000 | X > 500) = Pr[(X > 1000) ∩ (X > 500)] / Pr[X > 500)

Since X is a continuous random variable, we can rewrite the probability of the intersection using the minimum of X:

Pr[(X > 1000) ∩ (X > 500)] = Pr[X > max(1000, 500)] = Pr[X > 1000]

Plugging in B = 500 into the CDF, we have:

Pr[X > 1000] = 1 - F(1000) = 1 - (1 - e^(-1000/500)) = e^(-2) ≈ 0.135

We already know from part a that Pr[X > 500) = e^(-1) ≈ 0.368.

Putting it all together, we have:

Pr[X > 1000 | X > 500) = Pr[X > 1000] / Pr[X > 500) = (e^(-2)) / (e^(-1)) = e^(-1) ≈ 0.368

This result shows that the conditional probability that X is greater than 1000, given that it is already greater than 500, is the same as the probability that X is greater than 500 on its own. In other words, knowledge of the fact that X is already greater than 500 does not change our prediction about whether it will be greater than 1000 or not.

To know more about conditional probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30144287

#SPJ11

If this double integral exists, then the function f is considered to be integrable over the rectangle D'.

Your question involving function, integrability, and rectangle. Given that f is a 2-variable real-valued function defined on a rectangle D,

we have f: [4, 6] x [c, d] → R, with D = [a, b] x [c, d]. Additionally, we know that D' is a subset of D, so D' = [a', b'] x [c, d] with a' ≥ a and b' ≤ b.

To determine the integrability of f on the given rectangle D', we need to check whether the double integral of f over D' exists. In other words, we need to evaluate:

∬[a',b']x[c,d] f(x, y) dy dx

If this double integral exists, then the function f is considered to be integrable over the rectangle D'.

To know more about variable click here

brainly.com/question/2466865

#SPJ11

                                     "Complete question "

Integrability (Show Working) 8 points Suppose that f is a 2-variable real-valued function defined on a rectangle D, that is, f : [4,6] x [c, d] + R, with D = [a, b] x [c, d]. Also suppose that D' is another rectangle that is a subset of D, so that D' = [a'. V] x [c, d] with a <a'<V <b and c < d <d' <d.

Prove that if f is Riemann-Darboux integrable on D, then f is Riemann-Darboux integrable D [Hint: one approach is to use both the 'if and the only if parts of the test for integrability given in Analysis Lecture 4.] Question 4. Upper Sums and Riemann Sums (Show Working) 8 points Suppose that f : [a,b] x [c, d R be a bounded function, and that P is a partition of [a,b] x [c, d].

Prove that the upper sum Uf, P) off over P is the supremum of the set of all Riemann sums of f over P. [Note: of course, a mirror image result is that L(S,P) is the infimum of the set of all Riemann sums of f over P, but you're only asked to write out the proof of the upper sum result for this question.]

A differential equation is an equation that relates an unknown function to its derivatives, or differentials, with respect to one or more independent variables. Therefore, N(t) = 666.67 - 566.67 * exp(-0.15*t + 0.7102)

The differential equation model for the population size N at time t is:

dN/dt = (birth rate - death rate + immigration rate) * N

where birth rate = per capita birth rate * N, death rate = per capita death rate * N, and immigration rate = constant immigration rate = 100.

Substituting the given values, we get:

dN/dt = (0.15N - 0.3N + 100) * N

dN/dt = (-0.15*N + 100) * N

dN / (-0.15*N + 100) = dt

-6.6667 ln(-0.15*N + 100) = t + C

where C is the constant of integration.

N(t) = (100/0.15) - (100/0.15) * exp(-0.15t - 6.6667C)

where (100/0.15) = 666.67.

To determine the value of the constant C, we need an initial condition. Let's assume that the initial population size N(0) = 1000. Substituting this in the above equation, we get:

1000 = 666.67 - (666.67 * exp(-6.6667*C))

Solving for C, we get: C = -0.1057

Substituting this value of C in the equation for N(t), we get:

N(t) = 666.67 - 566.67 * exp(-0.15*t + 0.7102)

Therefore, the model for the population size N at time t, reflecting the given assumptions, is:

N(t) = 666.67 - 566.67 * exp(-0.15*t + 0.7102)

To learn more about “differential equations” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/1164377

#SPJ11

The value of the fractions is 10.

We know,

A fraction is described as the part of a whole.

The different types of fractions are;

Here, we have,

Given the fractions;

3 1/4 + 2 1/8 +2 7/8+1 3/4

convert to improper fractions, we have;

13/4 + 17/8 + 23/8 + 7/4

Find the LCM

26 + 17 + 23 + 14 /8

Find the values

80/8

divide the values

10

Learn about fractions at:

brainly.com/question/11562149

#SPJ1

complete  question:

What is the answer 3 1/4 + 2 1/8 +2 7/8+1 3/4+1 3/4 +? Show the work

Cross multiplying

20 × 5 = t × t

100 = 2t

Dividing 2 on the opposite side

100/2 = t

t = 50

The white cylindrical silo has a diameter of 30 feet, which means the radius is 15 feet. The height of the silo is 80 feet. The area of the red stripe on the cylindrical silo is approximately 565.5 square feet.

A red stripe with a horizontal width of 3 feet is painted on the silo, making two complete revolutions around it. This means the total length of the red stripe is 2 times the circumference of the base of the silo plus 2 times the circumference of the top of the silo. The circumference of the base of the silo is 2 times pi times the radius, which is 2 x 3.14 x 15 = 94.2 feet.
The circumference of the top of the silo is also 94.2 feet
So the total length of the red stripe is 2 x 94.2 + 2 x 94.2 = 376.8 feet.  The horizontal width of the red stripe is 3 feet, so the area of the red stripe is 376.8 x 3 = 1130.4 square feet.
To find the total surface area of the silo, we need to find the area of the two circular ends and the area of the curved surface. The area of each circular end is pi times the radius squared, which is 3.14 x 15 x 15 = 706.5 square feet.
The area of the curved surface is the product of the height, the circumference, and 2 (since there are two sides), which is 80 x 94.2 x 2 = 15,088 square feet.
So the total surface area of the silo is 2 x 706.5 + 15,088 = 15,501 square feet.
Therefore, the area of the red stripe as a percentage of the total surface area of the silo is (1130.4/15,501) x 100% = 7.29%.

A white cylindrical silo has a diameter of 30

feet and a height of 80

feet. A red stripe with a horizontal width of 3

feet is painted on the silo, as shown, making two complete revolutions around it. What is the area of the stripe in square feet?

learn more about circumference here: brainly.com/question/28757341

#SPJ11

The total number of milliliters of perfume is 1,600 mL. Then the correct option is D.

Two cases of perfume are delivered to a retailer. There are ten bottles in each case. There are 80 millimeters of perfume in each bottle.

Algebra is the study of abstract symbols, while logic is the manipulation of all those ideas.

The total number of milliliters of perfume is calculated as,

⇒ 2 x 10 x 80

⇒ 1,600 mL

Thus, the correct option is D.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ1